Tumgik
Text
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I say good riddance. The medical field is safer without her in it.
Just to emphasise how deeply unserious and internet poisoned the “ceasefire for me but none for thee” girlies are, here’s the story of an “activist” who left behind a promising medical career to focus on “organising” and fucked around and found out: she made explicit death threats at a city council meeting and then cried when indicted in a court of law for those threats
People like her forget that speaking to others like you would on social media but offline can, in fact, result in consequences.
123 notes · View notes
Text
They’re scared of us.
When we free Palestine, we free everyone else.
650 notes · View notes
Text
Russia, 1881: We’re gonna kill any Jew that doesn’t flee Russia. We’re restricting Jewish emigration to Europe, but permitting emigration to the Middle East.
Germany, Austria, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Finland, Slovakia, Croatia, France, and others, 1933-1945: We’re gonna kill every Jew in Europe. Flee to the US or Palestine, or die trying.
The US, 1927-1952: Yeah sorry we’re restricting Jewish immigrants to like. 300 people per country. So good luck getting in. We recommend that Jews go to Palestine instead. Btw we are looking to take in Nazi scientists if you know any
Egypt, 1947-1950: We’re rounding up all our Jews and deporting them to Israel
Iraq, 1951-1952: We’re rounding up all our Jews and deporting them to Israel
Algeria, 1962-1965: We’re pressuring and intimidating Jews in the hopes that they’ll all leave the country and go to Israel
Egypt, 1956: We’re rounding up all our Jews and deporting them to Israel (again)
Egypt and Libya, 1967: We’re rounding up, torturing, and killing all our Jews. The ones that survive can flee to Israel
Poland, 1968: The Jews in our country are already loyal to Israel. They will face dire consequences if they don’t leave our country and go to Israel
Ethiopia, 1974-1985: We’re going to marginalize and eventually try to kill all our Jews, and the only way they can escape is by being airlifted out of the country by Israeli helicopters
The US, 2023: Why can’t the Israeli Jews just go back to where they came from? Don’t they all have dual citizenship or whatever?
2K notes · View notes
Note
Wow, this is ridiculous. This bitch really thinks this is activism. And of course the Hamas stans will support her.
Next the pro palestinians need to boycott the zionist...*checks notes*...uh...Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment... for firing Riddhi Patel! She was just standing up for Palestine and demanding a ceasefire in Gaza from her local town officials in Bakersfield, CA. At the threat of murdering them in their house.
https://www.tumblr.com/mirkobloom77/747887128550244352/boycott-zionist-center-on-race-poverty-the?source=share
What a clown show
Fellas is it a Zionist thing to fire your employer when they make public threats to council members
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Let's boycott a non profit org that works for low income communities as well as communities of color because they don't let their employees make explicit threats :^ #activism
81 notes · View notes
Text
A lying liar lied? Colour me surprised.
Tumblr media
Yeah we been knew
Try explaining this away, pal-anoners
258 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
I give up.
222 notes · View notes
Text
"the reason muslims are allowed to have 55 countries is because people in those countries were always muslim."
OH REALLY. so Kosovo, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan were all originally muslim? THEY ARE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES.
Bangladesh, Indonesia, the converted billions in Malaysia, SIngapore, Thailand, etc were originally muslim? THESE ARE ASIAN COUNTRIES.
Somalia, Sudan, Sierra Leone, Mauritania, Mayotte, Libya, Senegal, etc were muslim nations originally, back thousands of years? THESE COUNTRIES ARE IN AFRICA, NOT ARABIA.
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU THINK ISLAM GOT TO THE REST OF THE WORLD??? OSMOSIS?
IT'S CALLED COLONIALISM AND CONQUEST. THESE PEOPLES ARE MUSLIM NOW ARE MUSLIM BECAUSE. OF. CONQUEST.
This is why Turkey, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, PALESTINE, etc have any Arab or muslim populations. CONQUEST. The native peoples in all of these places were not originally muslim or Arab at all.
Pull your head out of your ass and stop pushign revisionist history. JIHADIST ISLAMIST (there is a difference between REAL ISLAM and ISLAMIST islam, just like there is a difference between christianity and the westboro baptist church) supporting Muslims are rewriting their history, their Quran, their religion, to push an abusive Jew hating message. They are painting muslims as victims in a history where they were always perpetrators. THEY are colonizers, just like european christians.
Pushing this worldview, these lies, is about as ignorant as arguing that the world is flat.
It is not "woke." It isn't liberal. It's pushing a fascist ideology that paints an oppressed group, Jews, as oppressors. The nazis did the exact same thing.
PLEASE learn real, actual history, supported by archaeology and primary sources.
Judea and Israel were originally and always Jewish land. It came under muslim rule due to CONQUEST. They took the name the ROMANS, one of the worst oppressors of Jews, gave to the area.
473 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
From Levantine_gay on insta
2K notes · View notes
Text
Gad Saad, Lebanese Evolutionary Behavioral Scientist & Author:
""The mindset in the Middle East is very simple. It is based on the Qur'anic concept of dhimmi status for all religious minorities who are "people of the book." Such people can at best be tolerated but they should NEVER be in a position in power whether within a country or within the Middle East. As such, Israel's existence violates a definitional and fundamental tenet of the mindset in the region. It is that simple. It has nothing to do with land; nothing to do with two states; nothing to do with other geopolitical realities. Islam is supreme. Islam can protect you as long as you know your place. Israel said NO! We have dignity; we have a right for self-autonomy. Ask yourself the following question: How are non-Muslim minorities faring throughout the Middle East? Yes, there are times when minorities are "tolerated" but the overlords reserve the right to exterminate you as they see fit. There is 1,400 years of that recorded history. Learn your history.""
45 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
4K notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
It isn't a mere coincidence, Isr@el had already planned the whole genocide on Palestine
3K notes · View notes
Text
Someone on Reddit made the mistake of saying, "Teach me how this conflict came about" where I could see it.
Let me teach you too.
The common perception is that Jews came out of nowhere, stole Palestinian homes and kicked Palestinians out of them, and then bombed them for 75 years, until they finally rebelled in the form of Hamas invading Israel and massacring 22 towns in one day.
The historical reality is that Jews have lived there continuously for at least 3500 years.
There are areas, like Meggido iirc, with archeological evidence of continuous habitation for 7,000 years, but Jewish culture as we recognize it today didn't develop until probably halfway through that.
Ethnic Jews are the indigenous people of this area.
Indigeneity means a group was originally there, before any colonization happened, and that it has retained a cultural connection to the land. History plus culture.
That's what Jews have: even when the diaspora became larger than the number of Jews in Israel, the yearning to return to that homeland was a daily part of Jewish prayer and ritual.
The Jewish community in Israel was crushed pretty violently by the Roman Empire in 135 CE, but it was still substantial, sometimes even the majority population there, for almost a thousand years.
The 600s CE brought the advent of Islam and the Arab Empire, expanding out from Saudi Arabia into Israel and beyond. It was largely a region where Jews were second-class citizens. But it was still WAY better than the way Christian Europe treated Jews.
From the 700s-900s, the area saw repeated civil wars, plagues, and earthquakes.
Then the Crusades came, with waves of Christians making "pilgrimages to the Holy Land" and trying to conquer it from Muslims and Jews, who they slaughtered and enslaved.
Israel became pretty well depopulated after all that. It was a very rough time to live there. (And for the curious, I'm calling it Israel because that's what it had been for centuries, until the Romans erased the name and the country.)
By the 1800s, the TOTAL population of what's now Israel and Palestine had varied from 150,000 - 275,000 for centuries. It was very rural, very sparsely populated, on top of being mostly desert.
In the 1880s, Jews started buying land and moving back to their indigenous homeland. As tends to happen, immigration brought new projects and opportunities, which led to more immigration - not only from Jews, but from the Arab world as well.
Unfortunately, there was an antisemitic minority spearheaded by Amin al-Husseini. Who was very well-connected, rich, and from a politically powerful family.
Al-Husseini had enthusiastically participated in the Armenian Genocide under the Ottoman Empire. Then the Empire fell in World War One, and the League of Nations had to figure out what to do with its land.
Mostly, if an area was essentially operating as a country (e.g. Turkey), the League of Nations let it be one. In areas that weren't ready for self-rule, it appointed France or Britain to help them get there.
In recognition of the increased Jewish population in their traditional, indigenous homeland, it declared that that homeland would again become Israel.
As in, the region was casually called Palestine because that was the lay term for "the Holy Land." It had not been a country since Israel was stamped out; only a region of a series of different empires. And the Mandate For Palestine said it was establishing "a national home of the Jewish people" there, in recognition of "the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country."
Britain was appointed to help the Arab and Jewish communities there develop systems of self-government, and then to work together to govern the region overall.
At least, that was the plan.
Al-Husseini, who was deeply antisemitic, did not like this plan.
And, extra-unfortunately, the British response to al-Husseini inciting violent anti-Jewish riots was to put him in a leadership role over Arab Palestine.
They thought it would calm him down and perhaps satisfy him.
They were very wrong.
He went on to become a huge Hitler fanboy, and then a Nazi war criminal. He co-created the Muslim Brotherhood - which Hamas is part of - with fellow fascist fanboy Hassan al-Banna.
He got Nazi Party funding for armed Muslim Brotherhood militias to attack Jews and the Brits in the late 30s, convincing Britain to agree to limit Jewish immigration at the time when it was most desperately needed.
He started using the militias again in 1947, when the United Nations voted to divide the mandated land into a Jewish homeland and a Palestinian one.
Al-Husseini wouldn't stand for a two-state solution. He was determined to tolerate no more than the subdued, small Jewish minority of second-class citizens that he remembered from his childhood.
As armed militias increasingly ran riot, the Arab middle and upper classes increasingly left. About 100,000 left the country before May 1948, when Britain was to pull out, leaving Israel and Palestine to declare their independence.
The surrounding nations didn't want war. They largely accepted the two-state solution.
But al-Husseini lobbied HARD. And by mobilizing the Muslim Brotherhood to provide "destabilizing mass demonstrations and a murderous campaign of intimidation," he got the Arab League nations to agree to invade, en masse, as soon as Britain left.
About 600,000 Arabs fled to those countries during the ensuing war.
Jews couldn't seek refuge there; in fact, most of those countries either exiled their Jews directly, confiscating their property first, or else made Jewish life unlivable and exploited them for underpaid or slave labor for years first.
By the time the smoke cleared and a peace treaty was signed, most of the Arab Palestinian community had fled; there was no Arab Palestinian leadership; many of the refugees' homes and businesses had left had been destroyed in the war; and Israel had been flooded with nearly a million refugees from the Arab League countries and the Holocaust - even more people than had fled the war.
That was the Nakba. The one that gets portrayed as "750,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled!" in the hope that you'll assume they were expelled en masse, their beautiful intact homes all stolen.
Egypt had taken what's now the Gaza Strip in that war, and Jordan took what's now the West Bank - expelling or killing all the Jews in it first.
(Ironically, Jordan was originally supposed to be part of Israel. Britain, inexplicably, cut off what would have been 75% of its land to create Jordan.
Tumblr media
Even more inexplicably, nobody ever talks about it. I've never seen anyone complain that Jordan was stolen from Palestinians. Possibly because Jordan is also the only country that gave Palestinian refugees full citizenship, and it's about half Palestinian now.
Israel is nearly 25% Arab Palestinians with full citizenship and equal rights, so it's not all that different -- but the fundamental difference of living in a country where the majority is Jewish, not Muslim, probably runs pretty deep.)
Anyway: that's why Palestine is Gaza and the West Bank, rather than being some contiguous chunk of land. Or being the land set aside by the U.N. in 1947.
Because Arab countries took that land in 1948, and treated them as essentially separate for 20 years.
Israel got them back, along with the Golan Heights and the Sinai Peninsula, in the next war: 1967, when Egypt committed an act of war by taking control of the waterways and barring Israel from them. It gave the Sinai back to Egypt as part of the 1979 peace accords between Egypt and Israel.
Israel tried to give back the Gaza Strip at the same time. Egypt refused.
Palestine finally declared independence in 1988.
But Hamas formed at about the same time. Probably in response, in fact. Hamas is fundamentally opposed to peace negotiations with Israel.
Again: Hamas is part of a group founded by Nazis.
Hamas has its own charter. It explains that Jews are "the enemy," because they control the drug trade, have been behind every major war, control the media, control the United Nations, etc. Basic Nazi rhetoric.
It has gotten adept at masking that rhetoric for the West. But to friendlier audiences, its leaders have consistently said things like, "People of Jerusalem, we want you to cut off the heads of the Jews with knives. With your hand, cut their artery from here. A knife costs five shekels.  Buy a knife, sharpen it, put it there, and just cut off [their heads]. It costs just five shekels."
(Palestinians were outraged by this speech. Palestinians, by and large, absolutely loathe Hamas.
It's just that it's not the same to say that to locals, as it is to say it where major global powers who oppose this crap can hear you.)
Hamas has stated from the beginning that its mission is to violently destroy Israel and take over the land.
It has received $100M in military funding annually, from Iran, for several years. Because Iran has been building a network of fascist, antisemitic groups across the Middle East, in a blatant attempt to control more and more of it: Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Houthis in Yemen.
Iran has been run by a very far-right, deeply antisemitic dictatorship for decades now, which pretty openly wants to take down both Israel and the U.S.
Last year, Iran increased Hamas's funding to $350M.
The "proof of concept" invasion of Israel that Hamas pulled off on October 7th more than justifies a much bigger investment.
Hamas has publicly stated its intention to attack "again and again and again," until Israel has been violently destroyed.
That is how this conflict came about.
A Nazi group seized power in Gaza in 2007 by violently kicking the Palestinian government out, and began running it as a dictatorship, using it to build money and power in preparations for exactly this.
And people find it shockingly easy to believe its own hype about being "the Palestinian resistance."
As well as its propaganda that Israel is not actually targeting Hamas: it's just using a literal Nazi invasion and massacre as an excuse to randomly commit genocide of the fraction of Palestine it physically left 20 years ago.
Despite the fact that Palestinians in Gaza have been protesting HAMAS throughout the war.
Tumblr media
774 notes · View notes
Text
Pseudo 👏 Hindus 👏 stop 👏 having 👏 boners 👏 for 👏 Jihadis 👏 challenge 👏
Ultimate clown behaviour istg.
They did it again.
THIS IS WHAT HINDUS ARE DEALING WITH IN INDIA!!!!
Open your eyes!!
Not one hindu celebration can go peacefully without this community flipping out and attacking our rallies!!!
Hindus have had enough!
We are tired of this shit.
AGAIN NO ONE WILL CONDEMN THIS AND IF HINDUS SPEAK ABOUT THIS WE WILL BE LABELLED AS ISLAMOPHOBIC!
Literally every hindu festival is marked by stone pelting by Islamists in some area of India or another.
And they did this before 22nd jan.
💔
304 notes · View notes
Text
This is Shani Louk, as her family asked people to remember her. Her family asked NOT to spread That Photo. Her family asked people to remember her for the way she lived.
So here's a photo of Shani Louk:
Tumblr media
The man who took the picture of her dead body being kidnapped by terrorists just won a prize for that.
The man who came with those terrorists. Who knew the attack is going to happen. Who took photos and show himself holding weapons.
The man who worked with the people who aimed and killed and raped
That man
Won a photography prize
For taking the photo of
A young murdered woman.
For doing nothing but
Stand aside
And encourage.
Her family didn't even get her Body back.
Shani isn't buried.
I am disgusted. There are no words I can use.
ReneDescartwheel on Reddit wrote:
The content of the photo is a young Israeli woman lying dead and half naked in the back of a pickup truck, bleeding profusely from a hole in her skull, with her murderers using her as a foot rest, en route to be paraded like a hunting trophy in front of cheering mobs of Gazan civilians. And yet, the caption of the award couldn’t have been more dismissive of the October 7th atrocities if Hamas had written it themselves. It paints a picture of a well planned and successful military operation, without a single detail of the brutality of the massacre that is necessary to give context to this photo. The language used is deliberately minimizing. For instance, instead of saying that Hamas took hundreds of hostages, including women and children, they said “…taking dozens of captives”. That’s it. Could be 24, could be 253. Whatever. Somehow, despite the content of the photo, most of the description was dedicated to conveying the details of Israel’s retaliation.
MadUmbrella added:
TIL that initially on 10/7 the image sold by Ali Mahmud to AP of the abduction of Shani Louk’s body was identified by AP as “the body of an Israeli soldier”, so AP took the words of Ali Mahmud, a palestinian terrorist, and called Shani Louk “an Israeli soldier” while she was a civilian tortured and killed at Nova music festival. AP shared the photo on their newsfeed on 10/7 at 7:41 am, just a few minutes after the photo was taken and added the caption provided by Ali Mahmud who knew that his friends were kidnapping, torturing and murdering civilians at the Nova festival. This is complicity in the crimes committed by the palestinians on 10/7. AP’s journalistic ethics are completely gone, that’s why they’re paying palestinian terrorists for the images of their crimes. AP corrected their initial story only on November 2.
571 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
815 notes · View notes
Text
There is no definition of genocide that describes what Palestinians in Gaza are currently suffering, unless you believe Ukraine was committing a genocide of Russians in Donbas or that World War II was a genocide against Germans.
The word you’re looking for is “war”.
As it stands, there is only one motivation, besides emotional manipulation through hyperbole, that explains this misuse of “genocide”: that is, to minimize cynically what Jews have experienced repeatedly in our history. Holocaust inversion is Holocaust minimization. Genocide inversion is genocide minimization. If you have be referring to this conflict as a “genocide”, I can only conclude it is because you finally have the opportunity you’ve always waited for to engage safely in Holocaust denial.
774 notes · View notes
Text
I reiterate: tankies are like "suicide is never the answer :( ........unless it's to support my pet political issue! Then you're a martyr!"
You're some of the worst people alive.
248 notes · View notes