Yo this is all super important.
Like I identify as queer itâs a larger convo if anyone cares,
but also growing up I had to deal with kids playing âsmear the queerâ at break and Iâm sorry if I refuse to believe a cis heterosexual aromantic person felt seriously threatened by that gameÂ
i mean don't feel like you need to take the time to do that i just don't understand what the problems were and/or if it was offensive and i'd like to know so i don't make the same mistake(s) in the future
thatâs alright, i was just gonna get high anyway tbh so i might as well go in if iâm gonna be rude lol.
If you arenât cisgender heteroromantic heterosexual, you belong in the queer community. Iâm sick of seeing this bullshit âyou arenât queer enoughâ sort of community policing.
firstly: âqueerâ is a slur, it is a reclaimed slur that applies to those who perform/express their sexuality/relationships/presentations(/u get what iâm saying) with same- or similar-gender individuals (this is an unnecessarily formal definition, really, but itâll work). definitionally, like really and truly, âqueerâ has been used to target, attack, and marginalize people who experience homophobia (by which i mean gay/bi/pan people). it is tied directly to that homophobia, and its use as a political label is an intentional response to that experience of marginalization. so using it as a synonym for âLGBTQ+ communityâ is not accurate, and itâs a misuse of the slur. as we all should be aware, slurs have roots and effects that go beyond the mere use of the word, and itâs disrespectful to look at the way that word has been used and abused and reclaimed and then say âweâre gonna use this for whatever we wantâ without acknowledging that it requires consent and community to be used in anything other than an oppressive way. so thatâs number one, and itâs important. thatâs the premise. itâs not âcommunity policingâ to say that the word has meaning, and that the meaning is still very real to a lot of people who have visceral reactions to that word and what it describes.
And by âcisgender heteroromantic heterosexualâ I mean ALL THREE of those things.
letâs clear something up right the fuck now. the term âhomosexual,â which is really the base from which all these other labels come from, was not a term that gay people came up with for themselves. idk if yall understand this. it sounds clinical and deviant and unnatural because itâs meant to. it was developed by straight people to label the kind of same-gender sexual conduct that they considered medically and socially abnormal, it has a criminalizing and damning sort of air to it that a lot of gay people feel and have expressed. i can understand and appreciate the desire and utility of this term to describe differences in how people experience attraction, but i would really, really caution people to be mindful of the history and context and development of all these terms, bc those are real and they have power in the world that canât just be excised for the purposes of an empty discursive exercise lol like i can understand the merit of labeling and i wouldnât want to take that away from people but i need you to realize that this tendency to endlessly pathologize and categorize and medicalize our identities as LGBTQ+ people comes from somewhere and we canât ignore that. these terms, used here, are obnoxious, frankly, and only matter in a discursive space. youâll see what i mean more below.
Are you a trans (binary or nonbinary) person who is attracted sexually and romantically to the opposite gender? You belong in the LGBTA+ community.
OBVIOUSLY they belong in the LGBTQ+ community lmao like that goes without saying, but âqueerâ and âLGBTQ+â arenât synonyms because WORDS HAVE MEANINGS and SLURS MATTER oh my fucking god.
also: itâs really weird that the OP would refer to a âbinaryâ trans person like iâm p sure itâs universally recognized that the gender binary is truly bullshit and drawing a distinction between âbinaryâ and ânonbinaryâ trans people does little besides add to that whole false construction of categories and labels that impede and attempt to pigeon-hole experiences, without understanding the actual meaning of the words as they are used/understood in peopleâs lived realities, you know what i mean? idk if OP is cis but i feel like if they are, this line would be a bit of a red flag as well, bc of the âoppositeâ schtick like okâŠ.and what theyâre literally describing is a straight trans person, and tbh itâs really really not anyoneâs business but that person themself to define their identity, least of all to apply a slur to them nonconsensually, so while itâs obviously true that this person theyâre describing is a member of the LGBTQ+ community, the implication that they are âqueerâ is not one that anyone besides that one person in question is actually qualified to make lmao pleaseÂ
Are you a cis person who is heteroromantic asexual? You belong.
Are you a cis person who is heterosexual aromantic? You belong.
âQUEERâ ANDÂ âLGBTQ+â ARE NOT SYNONYMS!! and even if they were, i am very uncomfortable positioning a cis straight aromantic man on the same field of experiences as, say, a bi trans woman, yknow? i think the kind of inclusivity and community the OP is describing here has no real-world roots or iterations, it exists discursively but itâd be laughable to act as though it translates to lived experiences that require real concentrated social justice work, esp if youâre not gonna account for male privilege and cis privilege and etc like i can agree with this, as a concept, in theory, but i think itâs a hard sell and itâs irresponsible to paint a cis aromantic heterosexual person as having to deal with the kind of shit that a trans aromantic heterosexual person, for example, or a man who has all those labels vs a woman who does, yknow? this is such a specific example that makes such a broad sweeping claim and while i think itâs absolutely very very true that we need to recognize the experiences of ace and aro people and acknowledge their marginalization, it is SUPER low on my list to give a shit about a cis hetero aromantic dude while trans women are out here getting killed like please.
Are you a cis bisexual who is currently dating a cis member of the opposite gender? You belong.
stop adding âcisâ to shit like this, it implies that trans people are not really their gender and itâs not necessary (also âopposite genderâ tbh like why say that again lol).
Are you an intersex individual who otherwise is heteroromantic heterosexual? You belong.
i have heard time and time again that intersex people are really not OK with being defined as âqueerâ without consent. this sentence is ugly af and itâs childish, it clearly makes no effort to actually connect with how intersex people live and deal with crap in order to prop up a broad definition of âqueernessâ that they might not identify with at all, but here we are applying a slur to these people without their consent??? stop.
Stop trying to alienate people based on some fucked-up âlevel of queernessâ. There are enough problems in the LGBTA+ community without people being exclusive.
BRUH the problems in the LGBTQ+ community are not about fucking exclusivity n shit, people are out here getting fucking MURDERED, this is sosososososo fucking petty and childish and so far removed from reality that it only makes sense in a discursive context that takes into account none of the lived realities of peopleâs actual lives.Â
57 notes
·
View notes
my dudes
my dames
my folksssssss of every gender
donât use homeopathic stuff, it is literal bullshit
and dont say homeopathic when you mean home or herbal remedies
homeopathy is based on this completely weird and very wrong idea that the more dilute something is, the better it works, and weâre talking parts per billion here
so like legit
dont use homeopathic shit
1K notes
·
View notes
To be fair, there are always gays in the starbucks
Yeah tbh lack of lgbt spaces really hurts. I want to meet other lgbt+ people in a situation that is not inherently sexual, alcoholic or online.
282K notes
·
View notes
Extra Aâs in my name is my least favorite thing somethingsomethingawesome
Why are there 2Â Aâs in Aaron? Why not 6? Whatâs stopping us?
112K notes
·
View notes
Meet Shamir, the âqueer black kidâ whoâs turn pop on its head Â
In the months leading up to his May 19 major-label debut, 20-year-old Shamir became popâs poster child for gender fluidity â and the source of much excitement over a nascent revolution in pop. The New York Times ran a feature titled âPop Music Catches Up to Shamir,â but the singer doesnât consider what heâs doing to be particularly earth-shattering.
âI donât think Iâm really doing anything thatâs too different or forward-thinking,â he says. âI think the whole âchanging pop musicâ thing is just more because itâs really different for people to see a queer black kid doing it.â
Except thatâs exactly whatâs different about Shamir: his lack of bullshit. And it touches more than just his image. It also affects his music.
537 notes
·
View notes