#john c breckenridge | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

patriotsnet · 3 years

Text

Why Did Democrats And Republicans Switch

New Post has been published on https://www.patriotsnet.com/why-did-democrats-and-republicans-switch/

Why Did Democrats And Republicans Switch

What Year Did The Democrats And Republicans Switch Platforms

Why Did the Democratic and Republican Parties Switch Platforms?

4.4/5DemocraticRepublicansRepublicansDemocratsDemocrats

After the end of Reconstruction the Republican Party generally dominated the North while a resurgent Democratic Party dominated the South. By the late 19th century, as the Democratic and Republican parties became more established, party switching became less frequent.

Beside above, when did the South become Republican? Via the Republican Revolution in the 1994 elections, Republicans captured a majority of Southern House seats for the first time. Today, the South is considered a Republican stronghold at the state and federal levels, with Republicans holding majorities in every Southern state after the 2014 elections.

Similarly one may ask, when did Republicans and Democrats switch colors?

Since the 1984 election, CBS has used the opposite scheme: blue for Democrats, red for Republicans. ABC used yellow for Republicans and blue for Democrats in 1976, then red for Republicans and blue for Democrats in 1980 and 1984, and 1988.

What were the views of the Democratic Republican Party?

DemocraticRepublicans were deeply committed to the principles of republicanism, which they feared were threatened by the supposed monarchical tendencies of the Federalists. During the 1790s, the party strongly opposed Federalist programs, including the national bank.

Neither Party Nets An Overall Advantage From The 9% Of Voters Who Have Switched Since 2018

Pew Research Center conducted this study to track how individuals partisan identities have shifted in recent years. For this analysis, we combined responses to eleven different waves of the American Trends Panel conducted between September 2018 and July 2020. Overall, 11,077 registered voters were included in this analysis. Because not all individuals responded to all 11 waves, we used a method called multiple imputation to fill in missing responses. Multiple imputation allows researchers to account for the uncertainty inherent in applying estimation techniques to missing data. See the methodology statement for more details.

Overwhelming majorities of both Republican and Democratic voters have retained their party affiliation over the past two years, a tumultuous period marked by a global pandemic, mass protests against racial injustice and a presidential impeachment.

Since 2018, comparably small shares of registered voters in both parties have changed parties. About one-in-ten voters who affiliated with the Republican Party or leaned Republican in September 2018 now identify as Democrats or lean Democratic. An identical share of voters who two years ago identified as Democrats or leaned Democratic now align with the GOP.

A new study, conducted on Pew Research Centers nationally representative American Trends Panel, is based on interviews with the same set of 11,077 registered voters on five occasions over the past two years, from September 2018 to July 2020.

An Introduction To The Different Types Of Democrats And Republicans: This Is A Story Of Factions Switching And Parties Changing

I cant stress this enough, a major thing that changes in history is the Southern Social Conservative one-party voting bloc .

This is the easy thing to explain given the conservative Souths historically documented support of figures like Calhoun, John Breckenridge and his Socially Conservative Confederates of the Southern Democratic Party, , the other Byrd who ran for President, Thurmond, C. Wallace, Goldwater , and later conservative figures like Reagan, Bush, and Trump .

The problem isnt showing the changes related to this, or showing the progressive southerners like LBJ, the Gores, and Bill Clinton arent of the same exact breed as the socially conservative south, the problem is that the party loyalty of the conservative south is hardly the only thing that changes, nor is it the only thing going on in American history .

Not only that, but here we have to note that the north and south have its own factions, Democrats and Republicans have their own factions, and each region and state has its own factions and that gives us many different types of Democrats and Republicans.

Consider, Lindsey Graham essentially inherited Strom Thurmonds seat, becoming the next generation of solid south South Carolina conservative, now solidly in the Republican party.

Birmingham was all about a Democrat spraying a firehose at a Democrats, while the Democrats sent in the national guard to stop the protestors, while a Democrat told the guard to stand down.

Don’t Miss: How Many Senate Seats Do The Republicans Have

The Fifth Party System And The The New Deal And Conservative Coalitions

Now that we have clearly illustrated the above factions and ideologies, we can move on to the last round of changes which happened from roughly the 1930s, to WWII, to the 1960s, to the 1990s as the FDR supporting Progressive Social Liberal New Deal Coalition faced off against the Socially Conservative anti-New Deal Conservative Coalition .

From the 1930s to the 1990s, from Hoover to Goldwater, to Nixon, to Reagan, to Bush, the Conservative Coalition drew southern solid southDixiecrat conservative Democrats out of the Democratic Party via their southern strategy. By the 1990s, this resulted in the modern American social conservative and sometimes classical liberal Republican party. Likewise, the New Deal coalition, which opposed the conservative coalition, drew progressives into the Democratic Party and out of the Republican party under FDRs New Deal, LBJs Great Society program, and Clintons New Democrats. This resulted in the modern American social liberal, and thus necessarily traditionally classically conservative in terms of authority party during the same time.

Although the tension between these two factions starts in the 1930s with the New Deal, it comes to a boiling point over issues like States Rights, the Second Red Scare, and Brown v. the Board of Education following WWII in the late 40s and 50s.

We have undertaken a new order of things; yet we progress to it under the framework and in the spirit and intent of the American Constitution. FDR

Why Did The Democratic South Become Republican

The south used to vote Democrat. Now it votes Republican. Why the switch? Was it, as some people say, because the GOP decided to appeal to racist whites? Carol Swain, Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University, explains.

Correction: President Eisenhower ordered 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, in September 1957; that is, after the 1956 Presidential election, not as stated in the video, before the election.

Once upon a time, every student of history and that meant pretty much everyone with a high school education knew this: The Democratic Party was the party of slavery and Jim Crow, and the Republican Party was the party of emancipation and racial integration.

Democrats were the Confederacy and Republicans were the Union. Jim Crow Democrats were dominant in the South and socially tolerant Republicans were dominant in the North.

But then, in the 1960s and 70s, everything supposedly flipped: suddenly the Republicans became the racists and the Democrats became the champions of civil rights.

Fabricated by left-leaning academic elites and journalists, the story went like this: Republicans couldn’t win a national election by appealing to the better nature of the country; they could only win by appealing to the worst. Attributed to Richard Nixon, the media’s all-purpose bad guy, this came to be known as “The Southern Strategy.”

Let’s take a brief look at each myth in turn.

Don’t buy it.

Read Also: How Can Republicans Live With Themselves

The Bottom Line On The Party Switch

The parties changed over time as platform planks, party leaders, factions, and voter bases essentially switched between parties.

Third parties aside, the Democratic Party used to be favored in the rural south and had a small government platform , and the Republican party used to be favored in the citied north and had a big government platform .

You can see evidence of it by looking at the electoral map over time . Or, you can see it by comparing which congressional seats were controlled by which parties over time . Or, you can see the big switch specifically by looking at the electoral map of the solid south over time. Or, you can dig through the historic party platforms.

With that in mind, we can sum up the history of the switches that created the modern party system as:

The old southern conservative Democrats, a big faction of voters called the solid south who were in Jeffersons anti-Federalist coalition, have essentially today changed parties and teamed up with the old Republican party of Lincoln .

Meanwhile, Teddys progressive faction essentially switched as well starting after Teddys run as a Bull Moose in 1912.

Generally then, the Democratic party started moving toward progressivism and the Republican party starting shifting more toward the conservative right from Harding forward, and this in turn changed the parties .

Neither Party Is Completely Blameless

The political history of African-Americans is often proved Douglas right. Yet, no one from any background whether a political, religious, or racial background should ever love any political party above principle. Although, history is clear that there have been major differences in how political parties treated black Americans. Neither party is completely blameless in all of its actions, nor have all the leaders in a party always been good or always been bad.

Understanding this truth, Representative Robert Brown Elliot, even though he was a strong Republican leader in his day, wisely advised, I am a slave to principles. I call no political party master. I have ever most sincerely embraced the democratic and representative ideal. Not indeed, as represented or professed by any political party but by its true significance, as transfigured in the Declaration of Independence and in the injunctions of Christianity.

Elliots admonition is wise. A line with political candidates that conform to what he called, The Injunctions of Christianity.

Don’t Miss: Are There More Republicans Or Democrats In The House

Democratic Losses In State Legislative Seats

During Obama’s tenure, Democrats lost members in 82 of the 99 state legislative chambers across the country. These losses were most visible in both chambers of the Arkansas and West Virginia state legislatures as well as the state senate chambers in Alabama and Oklahoma.

The following table illustrates Democrats’ five largest losses in state legislative seats during President Obama’s two terms in office. Rankings were adjusted to account for varying sizes of legislative chambers.

Top five Democratic losses in state legislative seats, 2009-2017 Chamber

When Did Democrats And Republicans Switch Platforms

Why Did the Democratic South Become Republican?

byAugust 31, 2020, 6:26 pm1.2k Views

Did the Democratic and Republican Parties switch platforms? Many people seem to think so. Whats the reality behind that? Did the party ideology switch? Did the party platforms switch? The reality is is that the republicans and democrats did not switch. The history of the is much more complicated.

You May Like: What Republicans Are Running Against President Trump

A Response To The Claim Welfare Is Equatable To Slavery

In the 1850s, inequality in the Northern big government cities, northern immigration in the big cities , and African slavery in the small government south all existed side-by-side. and in ways, so it is today . Northern cities still favor bigger government, and they still have problems of racism and inequality, Rural South still favors small government . This does not make the North of today equatable to the slave economy of the South of yesterday however.

There is this idea that welfare is equatable to slavery in this respect, as in both cases a societal structure is providing basic essentials for a class of people . This argument, often presented in tandem with the claim the parties didnt switch/change is essentially a red herring that misses the nuances we describe on this page .

The southern conservatives who held slaves and fought for the Confederacy essentially switched out of the Democratic party starting in the 1960s, and even continuing to the modern day , in response to LBJs welfare programs . In other words, if the southern conservative had wanted to oppress a class of people with welfare, one would logically assume they wouldnt have switched out of the Democratic party over time in response to welfare programs.

Today it is a Southern Republican who flies to Confederate flag, today it is a Republican who champions small government in America. Yesterday, it was a Southern Democrat.

What Does Democratic Mean

Starting alphabetically, the word means pertaining to or of the nature of democracy or a democracy.

Simply put, the lowercase democratic is a word used to refer to anything that resembles or has to do with a , a form of in which the supreme power rests with the people and is exercised by them directly or by politicians that they elect to them. In practice, this is usually accomplished through a fair, organized system of voting, in which or cast votes in support of political or societal issues .

So, the word democratic is used to describe government systems that are or resemble democracies and the people that run these types of governments. The United States of America is a representative democracy in which the people elect representatives to perform the demands of politics on their behalf. This is why we say that the US is a democratic country or that we have a democratic form of government.

The English word democratic dates all the way back to the late 1500 and early 1600s. It is derived from the Greek word dmokratía . The government system of the ancient Greek of Athens, in which the people held the power , is considered the worlds first democracy. Considering that Athens was a slave-owning society, its form of democracy was much different than the democratic governments of today.

You May Like: Why Do Republicans Hate John Mccain

The Founding Federalists And Anti

To see how the parties have evolved properly from the founders to 2016, we can start by comparing pre-Civil War factions such as the founding Federalists and Anti-Federalists in the First Party System.

Here we can compare figures like the North Eastern Federalists Alexander Hamilton and John Adams to the Virginian Anti-Federalists Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry to get a sense of the two general types of ideologies that color Americas future parties and factions .

Here we can see the roots of progressivism and states rights populism in the Democratic party and the roots of traditional pro-business conservatism in the Federalists. Here we can also note that, despite none of the founders supporting slavery, it is the small government mentality to Democrats that allows for slavery, while the Whig-like conservatism of the Federalists is more geared toward global trade and banking and less tolerant of the nefarious institution.

Although we can put the founders in two big tents and understand American history that way, looking at the nuanced views of the founders allows us to better understand the roots of the different types of liberal and conservative / elite and populist positions that we find in each party system.

Men by their constitutions are naturally divided into two parties.Thomas Jefferson

National debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing.Alexander Hamilton

Republicans Change Their Minds But Did They Switch Platforms

But Republicans didnt immediately favor limited government. Instead, for a couple of decades, both parties are promising an augmented federal government Rauchway wrote in a 2010 blog post for the Chronicles of Higher Education. Republican rhetoric drifted to a small-government platform cemented in the 1930s with its opposition to the New Deal.

But why did Democrats start advocating for big government? According to Rauchway, both parties were trying to win the new Western states. The admission of new western states to the union in the post-Civil War era created a new voting bloc. Both parties competed for them to control Washington D.C.

Read Also: How Many Republicans Are In The United States

The Third Party System: Reconstruction And The Gilded Age

Post-Civil War era politics in the United States can be understood by examining the Third Party System factions of Reconstruction and the Gilded Age.

In the Gilded Age things change in a major way due to both parties embracing cronyism but before we get there we need to understand Reconstruction.

The changes in the Republican party in this era are best explained by looking at the conservative, moderate, and radical Republicans of Reconstruction . Meanwhile factions like carpet baggers and ex-Southern Unionist scallywags are illustrative of different reconstruction Democrats.

Here it is vital to note one of the hardest things to talk about in American history, but Ill say it plain. The South didnt want to lose the war, they wanted to win, they didnt want to stop slavery, they wanted to continue it. They did not respond well to losing the war. Lincoln was immediately executed, Andrew Johnson took over, he was impeached, and the military had to occupy the south while the KKK committed what was frankly genocide against Freedmen.

As noted above, Reconstruction was part rebuilding, part Civil Rights , part enforcing actual law and order and preventing forced slavery under different names and murder , and part Redeemers.

The Redeemers completely changed the Democratic party by unifying the non-racist factions and moving the Democratic party toward business interests .

The Claim: The Democratic Party Started The Civil War To Preserve Slavery And Later The Kkk

As America marks a month of protests against systemic racism and many people draw comparisons between current events and the Civil Rights Movement, an oversimplified trope about the Democratic Partys racist past has been resurrected online.

Friendly reminder that if you support the Democrat Party, you support the party that founded the KKK and start a civil war to keep their slaves,” claims an image of a tweet Instagram user @snowflake.tears shared June 19.

Many Instagram users read between the lines for the tweets implication about the modern Democratic and Republican parties. Some argued this past action discredited current liberal policies, while others said it did not matter.

Historians agree that although factions of the Democratic Party did majorly contribute to the Civil War’s start and the KKK’s founding, it is inaccurate to say the party is responsible for either.

Read Also: How Many Seats Do Republicans Need To Keep The House

A Faction Of The Democratic Party Started The Civil War

Opponents of slavery extending further into America founded the Republican Party. They elected President Abraham Lincoln in 1860, in response to escalating tensions around slavery after the Kansas-Nebraska Bill of 1854threatened the balance of slave states to free states.

Southern states, primarily led by Democrats, initiated secession proceedings and launched the Civil War. But historians say the party is not to blame.

The short answer is that the Democratic Party did not start the Civil War, Hunter said. The war was initiated by Southern slaveholding states seceding from the United States.

Jon Grinspan , the Smithsonians National Museum of American History curator of political and military history, agreed.

A splinter of a splinter of a Democratic Party really contributed to the secession and the coming of the war, he told USA TODAY. It would be wrong to say the Democratic Party started the Civil War. It would be right to say some Democrats really contributed to the start of the Civil War.

Grinspan pointed to the small group of Northern Democrats that fought for the Union as evidence that the Civil War was not Democrats versus Republicans.

Fact check:Joe Biden’s great-grandfather didn’t own slaves, fight for Confederacy

Black Leaders Were Gradually Pushed Out

Democrats vs Republicans: Did the parties switch?

For a generation after Reconstructions end, these Southern state parties had a significant number of black Republicans in leadership positions. In Texas, for example, Norris Wright Cuney a black man was the state party boss between 1884 and 1896.

But over time, white-supremacist Republicans known as the Lily-Whites pushed black leaders like Cuney and their white allies known as the Black-and-Tans out of the party.

Although this fight was mostly over control of federal patronage, the Lily-Whites argued that the only way for the GOP to win elections in the region again was to become a white party and purge its black leaders. This was because black voters were largely disenfranchised and white Southern voters were unwilling to vote for a Negro party.

To find out how and when Lily-Whites took control of each Republican state party organization, we collected data on the race of all Southern delegates to Republican National Conventions between 1868 and 1952. Our data shows a common pattern: Most Southern states saw a major decline in black leadership at some point in the early 20th century.

In some states like North Carolina, Alabama and Virginia the purge of black leaders was quick and lasting. Other states fended off the Lily-Whites for a time. Mississippi, for example, remained under the control of Perry Howard, a black man, until 1960 and consistently sent majority black delegations to the GOP convention.

Also Check: Why Do Republicans Want To Get Rid Of The Epa

This Is Not A New Argument

Princeton University Edwards Professor of American History Tera Hunter told USA TODAY that this trope is a fallback argument used to discredit current Democratic Party policies.

At the core of the effort to discredit the current Democratic Party is the refusal to accept the realignment of the party structure in the mid-20th century, Hunt said.

In September, NPR host Shereen Marisol Maraji called the claim, one of the most well-worn clapbacks in modern American politics.

Comedian Trevor Noah tackled the misleading trope on an episode of “The Daily Show” in March 2016, after two CNN contributors debated the topic.

Every time I go onto Facebook I see these things: Did you know the Democrats are the real racist party and did you know the Republicans freed the slaves? Noah joked. A lot of people like to skip over the fact that when it comes to race relations, historically, Republicans and Democrats switched positions.

A similar meme attributing the claim to U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson has been circulating on social media since November 2016.

Who started the KKK? That was Democrats. Who was the party of slavery? Who was the part of Jim Crow and segregation? Who opposed the Civil Rights Movement? Who opposed voting rights? It was all the Democrats, the meme reads.

Other posts making more specific claims about the Democratic Party starting the Civil War or founding the KKK continue to circulate.

The Roots Of The Parties Racial Switch

Today, Black Americans are the strongest Democratic constituency and White Southerners are the strongest Republican groupbut it used to be the other way around. The usual story places 1960s civil rights policymaking at the center of the switch, but an important prior history in the North and the South made it possible. Keneshia Grant finds that the Great Migration north changed the Democratic Party because Black voters became pivotal in Democratic cities like New York, Chicago, and Detroit, leading politicians to respond, including new Black elected officials. Boris Heersink finds that Southern Republican state parties became battles between racially mixed and lily-white factions, mostly for control of patronage due to national convention influence. The lily-white takeovers enabled early Republican gains in the South. These trends predated national civil rights policymaking and help explain how we reached todays divided regional and racial politics.

Photo Credit: Yoichi Okamoto / Public domain

Recommended Reading: Why Are Republicans Trying To Repeal Obamacare

Understanding The Changes In Pre

To recap before moving on: In the late 1700s the American factions won their independence from Britain and formed a new country by compromising and coming together as Federalists and Anti-Federalists, in the early 1800s they found some unity under Jefferson as Democratic-Republicans, but from Jackson to the Civil War their differences pulled them apart with greater force than their commonalities united them together. The divisive new platforms of the parties create two polarized groups splitting America into Democrats/Confederates of the South and Republicans/the Union of the North by the start of the Civil War in 1861 under the Republican Lincoln who ran on a platform which opposed the expansion of slavery.

To understand how things went south so quickly, one has to understand how classical liberal positions can become socially conservative over time. The classical liberalism of Jefferson did not allow individual freedom for everyone, as it allowed for the freedom to own slaves and the freedom for states to be slave states. Thus, what was once progressive had become socially conservative over time, it was still technically liberal in the classical sense, just certainly not socially progressive but of course, let us not paint any party in any era with a broad brush, as both parties in any era are compromised of factions who agree only to varying extents.

0 notes

lil-als · 1 year

Text

I love when daguerreotypes make lighter eye colors look pale and haunting to the point where the person being photographed looks possessed.

Breckenridge for reference

#daguerreotype #john c breckenridge #eyes

12 notes · View notes

antebellumite · 2 years

Text

so this might be exaggerating things a bit….

#the congressional incubator #martin van buren #andrew jackson #henry clay #james k polk #daniel webster #john j crittenden #benjamin brown french #nicholas biddle #robert haynes #millard fillmore #thomas benton #stephen douglas #franklin pierce #john c breckenridge #henry wise #john c calhoun #william graves #jonathan cilley

21 notes · View notes

statetalks · 3 years

Text

Why Did Democrats And Republicans Switch

What Year Did The Democrats And Republicans Switch Platforms

Why Did the Democratic and Republican Parties Switch Platforms?

4.4/5DemocraticRepublicansRepublicansDemocratsDemocrats

Similarly one may ask, when did Republicans and Democrats switch colors?

What were the views of the Democratic Republican Party?

Neither Party Nets An Overall Advantage From The 9% Of Voters Who Have Switched Since 2018

An Introduction To The Different Types Of Democrats And Republicans: This Is A Story Of Factions Switching And Parties Changing

I cant stress this enough, a major thing that changes in history is the Southern Social Conservative one-party voting bloc .

Consider, Lindsey Graham essentially inherited Strom Thurmonds seat, becoming the next generation of solid south South Carolina conservative, now solidly in the Republican party.

Birmingham was all about a Democrat spraying a firehose at a Democrats, while the Democrats sent in the national guard to stop the protestors, while a Democrat told the guard to stand down.

Don’t Miss: How Many Senate Seats Do The Republicans Have

The Fifth Party System And The The New Deal And Conservative Coalitions

We have undertaken a new order of things; yet we progress to it under the framework and in the spirit and intent of the American Constitution. FDR

Why Did The Democratic South Become Republican

Correction: President Eisenhower ordered 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, in September 1957; that is, after the 1956 Presidential election, not as stated in the video, before the election.

Democrats were the Confederacy and Republicans were the Union. Jim Crow Democrats were dominant in the South and socially tolerant Republicans were dominant in the North.

But then, in the 1960s and 70s, everything supposedly flipped: suddenly the Republicans became the racists and the Democrats became the champions of civil rights.

Let’s take a brief look at each myth in turn.

Don’t buy it.

Read Also: How Can Republicans Live With Themselves

The Bottom Line On The Party Switch

The parties changed over time as platform planks, party leaders, factions, and voter bases essentially switched between parties.

With that in mind, we can sum up the history of the switches that created the modern party system as:

Meanwhile, Teddys progressive faction essentially switched as well starting after Teddys run as a Bull Moose in 1912.

Neither Party Is Completely Blameless

Elliots admonition is wise. A line with political candidates that conform to what he called, The Injunctions of Christianity.

Don’t Miss: Are There More Republicans Or Democrats In The House

Democratic Losses In State Legislative Seats

Top five Democratic losses in state legislative seats, 2009-2017 Chamber

When Did Democrats And Republicans Switch Platforms

Why Did the Democratic South Become Republican?

byAugust 31, 2020, 6:26 pm1.2k Views

You May Like: What Republicans Are Running Against President Trump

A Response To The Claim Welfare Is Equatable To Slavery

Today it is a Southern Republican who flies to Confederate flag, today it is a Republican who champions small government in America. Yesterday, it was a Southern Democrat.

What Does Democratic Mean

Starting alphabetically, the word means pertaining to or of the nature of democracy or a democracy.

You May Like: Why Do Republicans Hate John Mccain

The Founding Federalists And Anti

Men by their constitutions are naturally divided into two parties.Thomas Jefferson

National debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing.Alexander Hamilton

Republicans Change Their Minds But Did They Switch Platforms

Read Also: How Many Republicans Are In The United States

The Third Party System: Reconstruction And The Gilded Age

Post-Civil War era politics in the United States can be understood by examining the Third Party System factions of Reconstruction and the Gilded Age.

In the Gilded Age things change in a major way due to both parties embracing cronyism but before we get there we need to understand Reconstruction.

As noted above, Reconstruction was part rebuilding, part Civil Rights , part enforcing actual law and order and preventing forced slavery under different names and murder , and part Redeemers.

The Redeemers completely changed the Democratic party by unifying the non-racist factions and moving the Democratic party toward business interests .

The Claim: The Democratic Party Started The Civil War To Preserve Slavery And Later The Kkk

Read Also: How Many Seats Do Republicans Need To Keep The House

A Faction Of The Democratic Party Started The Civil War

Southern states, primarily led by Democrats, initiated secession proceedings and launched the Civil War. But historians say the party is not to blame.

The short answer is that the Democratic Party did not start the Civil War, Hunter said. The war was initiated by Southern slaveholding states seceding from the United States.

Jon Grinspan , the Smithsonians National Museum of American History curator of political and military history, agreed.

Grinspan pointed to the small group of Northern Democrats that fought for the Union as evidence that the Civil War was not Democrats versus Republicans.

Fact check:Joe Biden’s great-grandfather didn’t own slaves, fight for Confederacy

Black Leaders Were Gradually Pushed Out

Democrats vs Republicans: Did the parties switch?

But over time, white-supremacist Republicans known as the Lily-Whites pushed black leaders like Cuney and their white allies known as the Black-and-Tans out of the party.

Also Check: Why Do Republicans Want To Get Rid Of The Epa

This Is Not A New Argument

Princeton University Edwards Professor of American History Tera Hunter told USA TODAY that this trope is a fallback argument used to discredit current Democratic Party policies.

At the core of the effort to discredit the current Democratic Party is the refusal to accept the realignment of the party structure in the mid-20th century, Hunt said.

In September, NPR host Shereen Marisol Maraji called the claim, one of the most well-worn clapbacks in modern American politics.

Comedian Trevor Noah tackled the misleading trope on an episode of “The Daily Show” in March 2016, after two CNN contributors debated the topic.

A similar meme attributing the claim to U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson has been circulating on social media since November 2016.

Other posts making more specific claims about the Democratic Party starting the Civil War or founding the KKK continue to circulate.

The Roots Of The Parties Racial Switch

Photo Credit: Yoichi Okamoto / Public domain

Recommended Reading: Why Are Republicans Trying To Repeal Obamacare

Understanding The Changes In Pre

source https://www.patriotsnet.com/why-did-democrats-and-republicans-switch/

0 notes

ricola3186-blog · 6 years

Text

Champ Ferguson 1821-1865

Champ Ferguson was a notorious guerilla fighter during the civil war. Born in Clinton County Kentucky in 1821 he was raised as a farmer and continued to farm for most of his adult life. His first wife and son died under mysterious circumstances. He later married again to a woman named Martha Owens. They had one child Ann Elizabeth.

Before the war Ferguson had a wild reputation. The hills of Tennessee and southern Kentucky still carry many of his supposed deeds both before and after the war. One story goes that he tied up a local constable to a tree and rode around cutting him until he died.

The Civil War broke out in 1861, and like many other families Ferguson's families loyalties were split. Kentucky was a border state and parts of East Tennessee had strong union leanings. My hometown of Albany Ky, part of the same Clinton County was very pro-union. Ferguson's own mother and brothers both supported the Union, but he chose to support the Confederacy

The reason why Ferguson chose to side the way he did is not clear. This is where some stories attempt to fill in the gap. One story goes that while Ferguson gone one day some Union soldiers came to his home and abused his wife and daughter. He then vowed revenge. There is also an account involving the previously mentioned murder of the constable. It goes that he was pardoned if he chose to fight for the south.

Neither story can be proven unfortunately. But as for his actions during the war, there is much more proof. There is the story of how Ferguson murdered William Frogge an old neighbor and friend of his. He suspected Frogge was a unionist, but had no proof. It is said Frogge was sick with the measles, and Ferguson paid him a visit.He shot the man in front of his family.

The one event that marks Ferguson's infamy in my hometown was how confederate forces attacked it in late 1864, burning the courthouse and many other buildings. Near the end of that same year Ferguson and his men fought at the first battle of Saltville near Saltville Virginia. The rebels won the day, but what happened next has historians split.

The event in question was the Saltville massacre. It is said that members of the 5th colored coalition, made up of former slaves, were killed after the battle in cold blood. Ferguson was said to have been out on the field shooting both white and black prisoners. Some historians debate the historicity of the event, and some argue about the number of prisoners killed. John C Breckenridge was appalled by some of the reports he received, and ordered some of the men, including Ferguson to be court marshaled. Ferguson was imprisoned for a time but was let go due to a lack of evidence.

In April 1865 the Civil War came to an end, and though I did not include all of the accounts of Ferguson's deeds here, I used two of the most infamous. For a more detailed picture of this man's life the book "Cumberland Blood: Champ Ferguson's civil war" is a good read.

Ferguson was hanged for war crimes on October 20 1865. Accounts of him escaping to the west cannot be proven, though that was the case with many of his former brothers in arms. He was one of only two men executed for this reason after the war, the other was Henry Wirz commander of the famous Andersonville Prison in Georgia.

Ferguson is buried in White County Tennessee at France cemetery. Stories about this man continue to be told in both Kentucky and Tennessee. Wether he is a hero or villain, I cannot judge.

1 note · View note

bdscuatui · 4 years

Photo

Giao dịch Bất động sản Quận Erie - Tin tức Buffalo Sau đây là các giao dịch bất động sản trên 5.000 đô la như được liệt kê trong hồ sơ của văn phòng thư ký Erie County trong tuần kết thúc vào ngày 31 tháng 1. ALDEN • 105 Birch Creek Run, Severyn Development Inc đến Sharon M. Kupkowski, 343.428 đô la. • 12160 Westwood Road, Barbara A. Raczka đến Scott Pfeil, 160.000 đô la. • 1002 Exchange St., Juanita B. Henry; William Michael Henry đến Matthew Ford Cinotti, 150.000 đô la. • 12160 Westwood Road, Barbara A. Raczka đến Scott Pfeil, 10.000 đô la. AMHERST • 3249 Sheridan Drive, Pontus Rad Port portfolio LLC đến Juri Properties LLC, $ 4,265,000. • 5165 Main St., Main-Sforest LLC đến M & k 1361 Associates LLC, $ 3,000,000. • 16 Avalon Meadows Lane, Avalon Meadows LLC đến Lola J. John- Roberts, 472.900 đô la. • 390 Le Brun Road, Mary Jane Nunz Revocable Living Trust 040418 Tr to Bradley P. Tuyn, 425.000 đô la. • 24 Willow Ridge Drive, Penton Living Trust Tr đến Mohammad Z. Rahimi; Zahid M. Rahimi, 405.000 đô la. • 72 Britannia Drive, Catherine F. Laberta đến Song Liu; Qianqian Zhu, $ 317.000. • Tòa án 43 Deepwood, Jennifer L. Dixon; Mark J. Dixon đến Horace Jackson III, $ 290.000. • 81 Lake Ledge Drive, Karl F. Kluckhohn đến John R. Hamlett Jr.; Patricia E. Hamlett, $ 275,000. • 25 Monroe Drive, Nancy A. Cickyham đến Mi K. Kim; Sidney Delmont Knight, $ 268.000. • 47 Tòa án Doral, Bryce E. Rizzuto đến Stacy Bowman, 255.000 đô la. • 45 Morningside Lane, Stanley B. Morgante đến Kinda R. economopoulos; Panagiotis G. economopoulos, 250.000 đô la. • 3991 Harlem Road, 3991 Harlem Road LLC đến Dickinson Company LLC, 249.000 đô la. • 136 Burroughs Drive, Joanne C. Cole; Scott A. Marshall đến Heather Lee Lapier, 236.380 đô la. • 685 Đường Hopkins, Harold Weigel; Norma Weigel cho Jacob T. Wixom; Kelli Wixom, $ 235,600. • 41 Breezewood Common, Stacy Bowman đến Corey M. Amo; Sumo Liu, $ 224,000. • 312 Maynard, Marilynn Quance cho Melissa Ann Achultz; Micah Douglas Schultz, 210.000 đô la. • 637 Emerson Drive, Buffalo Empire LLC đến James A. Wright, 210.000 đô la. • 78 Lâu đài sân thượng, Julianna Woite; Robert Woite cho Michael Simpson; Patricia Simpson, 190.000 đô la. • 399 West Klein Road, David R. Anthony đến Wahidul Hồi giáo, 190.000 đô la. • 4692 North Bailey Ave., Cheryl L. Heindl đến David S. Sperrazzo, 186.000 đô la. • 287 Đại lộ Rosedale, Aaron Daniel Annas; Jenny Annas đến Jennifer Labelle; Marc J. Labelle, $ 183,855. • 112 Đường Margaret, Gail M. Bergman; James M. Bergman đến Bekir Ogut; Feruza Ogut, 180.000 đô la. • 40 Bernhardt Drive, Maureen Fahey đến Fda Holdings LLC, 180.000 đô la. • 25 Tòa án, Dennis A. Wisniewski; Pamela H. Wisniewski đến Daniel J. Gerena; Jennifer L. Gerena, 161.000 đô la. • 24 Bissell Drive, Brian Nannen đến Eric J. Jankowski, 156.000 đô la. • 353 Burroughs Drive, Alfred A. Trybus tới 4267 Camp Road LLC, 150.000 đô la. • 102 Đơn vị đồng cỏ cũ 10b, Lisa J. Gallo tới Stanley B. Morgante, 150.000 đô la. • 222 Frankhauser, Tara Lyne Peterson cho Lamaison Enterprises Corp, 145.000 đô la. • 3 Newgate Road, HUD đến Peirong Tang, 136.000 đô la. • 106 Alberta Drive, Frank A. Miller; Mary A. Miller; Mary Miller đến Jonathan M. Passman, 135.000 đô la. • 180 South Forest Road, Jeanne C. Marcella đến Dean P. Arthur, 87.500 đô la. • 94 Lynette Lane, Ciminelli Muir Woods LLC đến Ryan Homes of New York, 82.330 đô la. • 230 Ivyhurst Road , Roger A. Ứng dụng; Roger Apps to Hallmark Homes LLC, 70.000 đô la. • 2010 Eggert Road, Marilynn B. Puglisi tới Richard F. Puglisi, 67.000 đô la. • 551 Sweet Home Road, Linda L. Boney tới Queen City Invest LLC, 60.000 đô la. ANGola • 48 North Main St., Kim F. Sidey; Stephen M. Sidey cho Rachel Switala, 113.000 USD. AURORA / ĐÔNG AURORA • 825 Main St., Lisa Matthews đến Jeffrey E. Kostecky; Kelly Kostecky, 382.000 USD. BLASDELL • 10 Marlowe Ave., Deanna Kroll-Haeick; Katya Kroll-Haeick cho Kyle J. Opiel, 135.000 đô la. • 22 Helen Ave., Craig M. Wilcox cho Tyler C. Wilcox, 110.000 đô la. CẦU • 35 đường Lotus Bay, James C. Lamacchia; Sandra A. Lamacchia đến Jacqueline Carol Richter; Rogers David Anthony Jr, $ 280.000. • Đường 352 Nordblum, Linda A. Gatewood; Linda A. Johnson; Linda Ann Johnson đến Daniel Madson; Laura Madson, 143.000 đô la. • 1313 Đường Cain, Rachel J. Switala đến Jonah C. Baldwin, 137.900 đô la. BUFFALO • 1275 Delkn, Ves Partners LLC đến 1275 Delwar LLC, $ 963,074. • 181 Elm St., Castle & cung điện LLC đến Orchard Park Road Storage LLC, $ 550,000. • 485 Michigan, Loran M. Bommer đến HHR Hassan, $ 533.000. ., Santo J. Mesi đến Corey Heinz; Benjamin Mcmahon, $ 475.000. • 38 Swan, 38 Swan St. Buffalo LLC đến 3279 Group LLC, $ 470.000. • 169 Anderson Place, Salway Hasan; Shawqi O. Hasan cho Paul N. Hurley, $ 310.000. • 170 Leslie, Leslie Bay LLC đến 170 Leslie LLC, $ 292.000. • 758 Richmond, Carl F. Linn; Jean E. Linn cho Emily N. Mongeon; James Patrick Spellman, $ 276.000. • 124 Oakwood West Place, Robert Milliner đến Joseph A. Brown, $ 270.000. • 50 Niagara St., Sambar Properties LLC đến Abba Z. Abramovsky; Jonathan I. Edelstein, $ 259.000. • 535 Bird Ave., Kinda Lord to Thomas A. Needell, $ 252.500. • 114 Fifteenth St., Suffoletto Real Real LLC đến Evgenia Sidorova, $ 244.000. • 565 & 563 West Utica St., Samuel Alvarado cho Djb Khu dân cư LLC, 240.000 đô la. • 1986 South Park Ave., Michael Kouimanis đến Dj92 Holdings LLC, 225.000 đô la. • 312 Bird Ave., Suffoletto Real Real LLC đến Patrick M. Weisansal II, 225.000 đô la. • 201 Carmel, Roman Celniker đến Thi Tonga Phạm , 210.000 đô la. • 134 Delavan East, Joshua Collins; Shannon L. Sherman cho Raymond Smith III, 175.000 đô la. • 133 Shenandoah, Jonathan J. Kuwik cho Michael Sullivan, 165.000 đô la. • 2289 Seneca St., Jimmie L. Byrd cho Crystal M. Fulinara; Benjamin R. Wilamowski, $ 159,700. • 163 Columbus, Michael E. Sullivan cho Jonathan Ruggiero, $ 157,000. • 947 Lafayette Ave., Vicky L. Lĩnh vực cho Chris Kausner, $ 150.000. • 1246 West, Eric E. Marciniak; Alex W. Osuch đến E2i Mua LLC, 150.000 đô la. • 335 Parkridge, Lamaks Realty & Management Inc đến Rajdeep Kaur Parmar, 142.000 đô la. • 499 Connecticut, Thành phố Buffalo cho Asha Said; Murjan Shaaban, 133.000 đô la. • 29 Peoria, Benjamin J. Gilbert Jr. Than Ma Than Than Phyu Phyu, 133.000 đô la. • 26 Sunnyside, Ismael Gomez cho Tha Mei; Hsa Paw, 130.000 đô la. • 502 Marilla, Jessica A. Dunkle cho Ilichi Santiago Đại tá; Jason Diaz, 128.000 đô la. • 828 Walden, Verna B. Wojcik đến Zahurul Alam; Farida Yasmin, 114.000 đô la. • 99 Nam Pontiac Sr, Janice A. Michalski đến Dilcia Diaz, 111.000 đô la. • 28 Norma, Calvin Thomas đến William Feliciano Rios; Sonia N. Rodriguez, 111.000 đô la. • 35 Hamlin, Merle S. Washington đến Granderson Fuqua, 110.000 đô la. • 135 Peter St., Ap Slide LLC đến Nhà tốt nhất WNY, 110.000 đô la. • 26 Bolton, Theresa Smith Goldfuss; Glenn Miller cho Joe Ryan Lam, $ 109,183. • 228 Columbus, Queen City Invest LLC đến Kc Erie Niagara Properties LLC, $ 102.000. • 226 Potomac, Hr Marine LLC đến Lawrence Markel Hawkins, $ 102.000. • 349 Potters Road, Mary M. Jordan- Lilis cho Adam Jason, 100.300 đô la. • 51 Hinman, Eloise W. Sordetto; John D. Sordetto Jr. đến Joyce Yu, 100.000 đô la. • 327 Sanders, Cơ quan quản lý cống Buffalo; Thành phố Buffalo đến Mitchell Thomas; Quianna Thomas, 100.000 đô la. • 602 Hopkins, Ellen Zimmerman đến Kelvin Chaparro, 95.000 đô la. • 359 Ogden South, thuộc hạt Erie; Nancy M. Snyder đến Melissa Neal, 90.000 đô la. • 1720 William St., Nabil Naji đến Mahedi Kaiser; Shahid Kaiser, 90.000 đô la. • 959 Sycamore, Authorty trâu cống; Thành phố Buffalo cho Tập đoàn bất động sản Bhuiyan, 83.000 đô la. • 2263 South Park Ave., Tgal Mgt LLC đến M & a Property Solutions LLC, 82.000 đô la. • 292 Downing, City of Buffalo đến Broadnest Property Inc, 81.000 đô la. • 250 Sobieski, Naima Hissu Mozibur Rahman, 72.000 đô la. • 64 Janet, Lauri Ann Butka đến Tasha S. Shepherd, 70.000 đô la. • 28 Thatcher Ave., Mnm Inc cho Asraful Hồi giáo, 68.500 đô la. • 194 Downing, Thomas J. Scime; Tomas J. Scime cho Robert Koerntgen Ira Ben; Công ty ủy thác vốn cổ phần, 65.000 đô la. • 74 Decker, Queen City Invest LLC đến M & t Rainbow Realty Corp, 64.000 đô la. • 114 Zittel, Nicole Marie Mauro cho Robert J. Ellis, 63.000 đô la. • 27 Heward, City of Buffalo đến Shaikh Quader, 60.000 đô la . • 207 Riverside Ave., Gloria James; Gloria J. James đến Buffalo Renaissance Properties LLC, $ 60.000. • 49 Argus, Thành phố Buffalo đến Ga Jami Chowdhury; Rita Chowdhury, 60.000 đô la. • 1268 Kensington, Josephine Mayfield đến Irin Wellness Inc, 60.000 đô la. • 295 Reed, Thành phố Buffalo đến Mohammed Sarwar, 57.000 đô la. • 78 Hempstead, Cơ quan quản lý cống Buffalo; Thành phố Buffalo đến Sirajum Munira, 56.000 đô la. • 399 Goethe, 716 Estates LLC đến Derek Andrews, 55.500 đô la. • 104 Humason, Nazma Akther đến Muharra Akhtar, 55.000 đô la. • 293 Cáp, Christine L. Skierczynski; Eric V. Skierczynski cho Peggy S. Ginter, 55.000 đô la. • 112 Peter, Sandra L. Williams đến 112 Peter St. LLC, 53.500 đô la. • 48 Belmont St., Ajay Ghimire đến Peninsula Wholesale Holdings Corp, 51.500 đô la. Wilson; Willie Wilson đến Buffalo Dreams Inc, 50.000 đô la. • 224 Esser, Abigail Torres; Osvaldo Torres đến Yonisbel Perez-Rodriguez, 50.000 đô la. • 576 East Amherst St., Matthew Reitz Ira Ben; Philip Greiner Ira Ben; Công ty ủy thác vốn chủ sở hữu đối với Noman Hossain, 50.000 đô la. • 115 Kamper, Thành phố trâu đến Lauren Schifferle, 50.000 đô la. • 315 Breckenridge, Cơ quan thoát nước Buffalo; Thành phố Buffalo đến Shukri Bile, 49.000 đô la. • 2445 Bailey, Thành phố trâu đến Mehedi Hasan, 48.000 đô la. • 21 Archer, Judy Berry cho Bd Asset Management Inc, 47.000 đô la. • 43 Bennett Vill, Thành phố Buffalo đến Mehedi Hasan, 47.000 đô la. • 110 Alma, Monoara Begum; Nazmul Hossain cho Romana Hồi giáo, 46.000 đô la. • 132 Bissell, Cơ quan quản lý cống Buffalo; Thành phố Buffalo đến Md Rahman, 45.000 đô la. • 199 Nho, Bạn của Buffalo Inc đến Mohammed R. Rahman, 45.000 đô la. • 344 Massachusetts, Buffalo West Side Properties Inc cho Peter J. Giglia, 45.000 đô la. • 293 Highgate, Daniel W. Barton ; Janet L. Barton; Bradley J. Stamm to Ruthie C. Colston, $ 43,502. • 69 Wade, Trâu cống Authorty; Thành phố trâu đến Medehi Hasan, 43.000 đô la. • 218 Crowley, Thành phố trâu đến Ahaya Adelman, 43.000 đô la. • 76 Bradley, Thành phố trâu đến Lauren Schifferle, 42.000 đô la. • 280 Cáp St., Joan Hahn đến Hypnarowski Bất động sản LLC, 42.000 đô la . • 163 Roebling, City of Buffalo to Sanmar Property Management Inc, 40.000 đô la. • 182 Spinnerer, City of Buffalo đến Noor Chowdhury, 40.000 đô la. • 588 Amherst East, Lsf9 Master Trion Trust Tr; Ngân hàng Hoa Kỳ NA Tr đến Mohammad S. Rahman, 40.000 đô la. • 40 Roslyn, Prymont Properties LLC đến Mir Rina Akther, 40.000 đô la. • 35 Cornwall, Thành phố Buffalo đến Mehedi Hasan, 39.000 đô la. • 11 Dunlop, Thành phố Buffalo đến Hong Sun , 38.000 đô la. • 1648 Bailey, Thành phố trâu đến Mohamud Khalil, 36.000 đô la. • 543 Đông Bắc, Michael A. Seaman; Thành phố Buffalo đến Ahmed Hossain; Md Abdul Man Nam, 36.000 USD. • 69 Keystone, Michael A. Seaman; Thành phố Buffalo đến Abdul Jalil, 35.000 đô la. • 53 Eller Ave., Nur Montakim đến Nilima Azmir; Md A. Habib, 35.000 đô la. • 56 Hoa hồng, Ben Zo77402; Công ty ủy thác vốn cổ phần; Yankee Buffalo Properties LLC Ben đến Diackamann Cavalier; Thara J. Noel, 35.000 đô la. • 57 Harriett, Thành phố Buffalo cho Sanmar bất động sản quản lý Inc, 34.000 đô la. • 167 Esser, Caroline Hochulski; Caroline Zatyko Hochulski; Sylvester T. Hochulski đến Terry J. Rang, 32.500 đô la. • 149 Erb, Ahmad Mishal cho WNY Reality LLC, 32.000 đô la. • 1539 Bailey, Cơ quan quản lý cống Buffalo; Thành phố Buffalo đến Mohamud Khalil, $ 31.000. • 200 Johnson St., Thành phố Buffalo đến Mohammad Hoque, $ 30.000. • 356 Bissell Ave., Mildred Patton đến Altaf Hussain, $ 28.000. • 12 Burlington, Thành phố Buffalo đến Mohammad Ullah, $ 26.000. . • 508 Howard St., Cristina Isabettini đến Fortunes America Properties LLC, 25.000 đô la. • 55 Mandan, Daniel T. Lavana đến Salaam Kasim Saleh, 25.000 đô la. • 187 Chester, Renaissance Hel Trust 2004-2 Tr; Ngân hàng Wells Fargo NA Tr đến First York LLC, $ 24,600. • 147 Người da đen, Thành phố trâu cho Michael Marks, $ 23.000. • 30 Zelmer, Thành phố Buffalo đến Shamsun Nahar, $ 20.000. • 192 Fifteenth St., 377 Rhode Island LLC đến Jjmslg Thuộc tính LLC, $ 18.500. • 116 Goembel, Thành phố Buffalo đến Rahima Khatun; Md J. Rubel, 16.000 đô la. • 20 Clifford, Domenic Migliaccio; Ortiz Zulma I Est đến Al-Tashi Dream Home Inc, 14.901 đô la. • 65 Hawley, Thành phố Buffalo đến Jose Cordero, 14.000 đô la. • 13 Geary, Keybank NA đến Moydom Inc, 8.251 đô la. • 1164 Broadway, Michael A. Seaman; Thành phố Buffalo đến K Razzaque, $ 8.000. • 1600 Fillmore, Cơ quan thoát nước Buffalo; Thành phố Buffalo đến Foyzur Rahman, 8.000 đô la. CHEEKTOWAGA • 3450 Union Road, Buffalo City Digs LLC đến 3450 Union Road LLC, $ 1,845,000. • 193 Whitney Place, Gerald P. Scheib; Sandra Scheib đến Terri A. Hanley; Kevin D. Moynihan, $ 284.000. • 1500 Cleveland Drive, Bruce Zeftel; Nhà hàng Jbecks LLC đến hết đường mòn LLC, $ 275,000. • 64 Blossomwood, Theresa M. Renkas đến Heinrich Family Living Trust 052693, $ 250.000. • 213 Towers Boulevard, Mary E. Vesneske; Ronald M. Vesneske đến Jessica Fox; Christopher Vesneske, 250.000 đô la. • Đường 283 Rowley, John M. Hamann; Kim M. Hamann đến Michael Nelson, 227.000 đô la. • 106 Croydon Drive, Mark C. Brandon; Đánh dấu Brandon; Daniel M. Killelea cho Lsf10 Master Trion Trust Tr; Ngân hàng Hoa Kỳ NA Tr, $ 176,196. • 403 Huxley Drive, Michelle E. Miosi cho Tyler B. Gajewski; Hailey Gajewwski, 169.600 đô la. • 40 đường lái xe, Denise M. Stachewicz; Michael A. Stachewicz đến Judith A. Kassirer; Leonard W. Kassirer, 160.000 đô la. • Ngõ 49 Deborah, Cánh đồng Joette; Stephanie Gallivan; Karin Marie Lorenzo; Linda Lee Neuner; Joseph Trusso Jr.; Mark Sebastian Trusso đến Omayra Torres, $ 157,900. • 787 Đường Borden, Nicholas Mastrocovo đến Jill Cline, $ 150.000. • 72 Bernice Drive, Dawn M. Emerson; Thomas E. Truax; Thomas G. Truax tới Anthony Autrino, 136.900 đô la. • 43 Đại lộ Oehman, Wolcott Development LLC đến Robert F. Barten, 134.900 đô la. • 209 Crisfield Ave., Margie A. Dojka đến Maria D. Reyes; Carlos A. Rodriguez, 122.000 đô la. • 88 Mcnaughton Ave., Stephanie Pokorski; Adam Wilkowski đến Bonnie Corbett; Cortney Corbett, 113.500 đô la. • 244 Bissell Ave., Lucy S. Otminski đến Matthew D. Newman, 110.000 đô la. • 683 South Huth Road, Susan Browne đến Gabrielle B. Drayer, 108.150 đô la. • 2188 William St., James T. Tycz Crimson Enterprises LLC, 97.500 đô la. • 36 Iroquois Ave., Sharon K. Pache tới Shahibur Rahman, 97.000 đô la. • 30 Nina Place, Buffalo Brick & mortar LLC đến Resa L. Logan, 94.900 đô la. • 90 Mildred Drive, Talcion Properties LLC đến Marcus A. Montgomery, 89.900 đô la. • Đường 22 Rowan, Debora L. Tennant; Jack L. Tennant Jr. đến Md Nazir Hossain; Shirin Sultana, 88.000 đô la. • 53 Fath, Pruitt Enterprises LLC đến Kevin Seaman Ira Ben; Công ty ủy thác vốn cổ phần, $ 76.500. • 51 Lydia Lane, Ruth A. Bleistein; Faye E. Granger; Gail L. Scotland đến Gail L. Scotland; Jamie Scotland, 75.000 đô la. • 270 Griffith St., Robert Dixon Jr. đến Raymone Gates, 60.000 đô la. • 36 Wildy Ave., Beatrice J. Amaraingham đến Ghh LLC, 53.000 đô la. • 70 Euclid Ave., HUD cho Isaiah Allen Jr.; Markus Allen, 52.000 đô la. • 62 Harlan St., Daniel Patrick Mitchikowski đến Pruitt Enterprises LLC, 22.000 đô la. CÂU HỎI • 9675 Rocky Point, Scott Innes to Paul Lamparelli, 900.000 đô la. • YAM Rocky Pt, Paul J. Barker; Sharon M. Barker đến Gary Mann; Lisa Mann, $ 845,000. • 10680 Rosewood Lane, Carline Cange; Jean Cange; Franklin Pratcher cho Merrill Lynch Nhà đầu tư thế chấp ủy thác cho vay thế chấp Chứng chỉ tài sản thế chấp sê-ri 2007-Sd1 Tr; Ngân hàng Hoa Kỳ NA Tr, 798.305 đô la. • 8889 Stonebriar Drive, Lsf9 Master Tham gia chính Tr; Ngân hàng Hoa Kỳ NA Tr đến Denisa Piccione; Samuel C. Piccione, $ 570,000. • 5672 Waterford Lane, Joseph A. Campagna đến Bassam Deeb; Jodi S. Deeb, 425.000 đô la. • 4267 Wildwood Drive, Jeffrey E. Kostecky; Kelly A. Obrien đến tháng tư L. Boss; Richard J. Boss Jr., $ 315,000. • 8463 Sheridan Drive, 6831 Seneca St. LLC đến Jkb Sheridan Properties LLC, $ 275,000. • Tòa án 5080 Elmcroft, Donald Wodworth; Donald F. Woodworth cho Lisa M. King, 230.000 đô la. • 4330 Đường Shisler, Ellen L. Mclean đến Bradley R. Hohman, 220.000 đô la. • 9820 Main St., Marjo Properties LLC đến PT Stephen LLC, 160.000 đô la. • 9405 Martin Road, Lsf8 Master Tham gia tin cậy Tr; Ngân hàng Hoa Kỳ ủy thác NA Tr cho Brian Grassia; Lynn Grassia, 120.000 đô la. • 9285 Đường Martin, Charles Kelkenberg đến Christopher J. Koss; Holly Koss, 10.000 đô la. EDEN • 8230 North Main St., 130 National Drive LLC đến Eastern Postal Realty Holdings LLC, $ 450.000. ELMA • 31 Douglas Lane, Mary Pat Gallivan; Mary Patricia Gallivan; Patrick Gallivan; Patrick M. Gallivan đến Cori L. Greenawalt; Richard R. Greenawalt, 825.000 đô la. • 701 Đường Girdle, Hauwaert Matthew Van đến Amy L. Biber; Brett Collson, $ 315,000. • Đường 311 South Blossom, Davis S. Kowalchot; Eileen E. Rizzo cho Raymond G. Weimer, 265.000 đô la. • 640 đường Winspear, Dean G. Miller; Marcia J. Miller; Thomas J. Miller; Marcia J. Scott đến Alexander X. Mayers; Kayla R. Zelasko, 250.000 USD. MỌI NGƯỜI • 1612 Old Manor Drive, Helene F. Spahn; Joseph J. Spahn đến Peter W. Rains, $ 221.500. • 9896 Redwing St., Kimberly A. Hulburd to Bohen Hornberger; Janelle Knaus, 164.300 đô la. • 8600 North Main St., Jason Rafferty; Misti Rafferty cho Aryle Goss, 128.000 đô la. • 0 Đường Bennett, Guy A. Capitano; Linda S. Capitano cho Jane Brueckl; John Brueckl, 40.000 đô la. • 6639 Revere Drive, Donald Braun đến nhà Sweet Homez LLC, 20.000 đô la. ĐẢO GRAND • Ngõ 128 Windham, Jason R. Allison đến Conny S. Gaertner; Lars-Erik Gaertner, 429.000 đô la. • Đường sửa chữa 2805, Bethany J. Conway; Brendan M. Conway Jr. đến David M. Seaman; Tracie Seaman, 410.000 đô la. • 3398 Đường sông Đông, John E. Beires; Ruth Beires cho Paul M. Parwulski, 360.000 đô la. • 109 Park Lane, Richard S. Campagna Sr.; Hương thảo A. Campagna đến Cheryl B. Frieday; Lance D. Frieday, $ 321,650. • Đường cố định 2047, Cheryl B. Frieday; Lance D. Frieday cho Alfred Valeri, $ 274.000. • 62 ngõ Lane, David M. Seaman; Tracie M. Seaman cho Daniel J. Griggs, 240.000 đô la. • 1591 Con đường tình yêu, Genevieve Kiny0on; Erik J. Kinyon đến Chelsea R. Kennedy; Seth Kennedy, 164.800 đô la. • 74 Marilyn Drive, Harry W. Enni; Arthur E. Jackson Jr. đến Lsf8 Master Trion Trust Tr; Ngân hàng Hoa Kỳ NA Tr, $ 131.500. • 1780 Đại lộ Grand Island, 2014 Mazur Family Trust Tr đến 1780 Grand Island Boulevard LLC, $ 11,375. HAMCHA • 3350 Cross Creek Way, Forbes Homes Inc đến Daniel J. Carrig; Taylor M. Randall, $ 470,594. • Công viên Middleham 4134, Nancy Basalyga; Ronald Basalyga; Rhonda Marie Jank đến Jeanne Kyte; John E. Kyte Jr., $ 305,000. • 25 Gỗ tròn, Linda P. Lamparelli; Richard P. Lamparelli cho Gabriel P. Butler; Shannon J. Butler, 271.000 đô la. • 3484 Đường South Creek, Erich W. Cominsky cho Michael T. Thurston; Shannon L. Thurston, 270.000 đô la. • 63 Allie Lane, Ryan ngôi nhà của New York đến Paul Szafranek; Samantha Szafranek, $ 258,740. • Tòa án 28 Jordy, Kaitlin Tomasulo; Victor Tomasulo đến Kathryn M. Manalili; Joseph A. Obergfell, $ 249,900. • 432 Nice Ave., Laney M. Harrison đến Carla M. Schmid, $ 180.000. • 5038 Bradley Lane, Virginia A. Buziak; Patricia A. Mirabelli cho Matthew D. Williams, 170.000 đô la. • 4608 Kennison Parkway, Gabriel P. Butler; Shannon J. Butler đến Molly A. Bartz, 169.000 đô la. • Địa điểm 4331-berkley, Gail Faulk cho Andrew Kiesling, 165.900 đô la. • 3217 Clearview Way, John A. Miller; Mary Ann Miller đến Cassondra Carlson; Trevor Wilson, 164.300 đô la. • 6285 Đường Boston State, Eileen M. Burns; Philip J. Đốt cho Brian J. Beyer, 135.000 đô la. • 4983 Daisy Lane, John Garcia; Robert Garcia đến Adam Sheffield; Wesley Sheffield, $ 126.500. • Đại lộ 4987 Mt Vernon, Michael F. Wiley đến Jamie L. Greene; Leonard C. Latona, $ 124,900. • Đất trống Yale Ave., David A. Hodgson; Charles Cũ; Charles Olds đến Edward Doll; Kimberly Hogan, $ 6.000. LACKAWANNA • 108 Circle Lane, Roberta M. Lisowski đến David T. Wolf, $ 159.000. • 155 Madison Ave., Terry L. Caber Sr.; Thomas R. Caber; William C. Caber Jr. đến Nakody Nikolas Beaver, $ 78.500. • 42 sân thượng tình yêu, Sunset Custom Homes Inc đến Ann M. Duszkiewicz; Thomas S. Duszkiewicz, 18.000 đô la. • 1970 đường Abbott, Michael A. Zuchowski đến Sam Nicholas Gardo, 15.000 đô la. LANCASTER • 78 Sterling Place, Cori L. Greenawalt; Richard R. Greenawalt đến Bryan Charles Silberblatt; Christina Kiliszek Silverblatt, $ 475.000. • 17 Tòa án Farmview, Mary T. Plewinski; William T. Plewinski đến Lauren Blatner; Philip Blatner, $ 347.000. • Đường 72 đường, Lauren B. Blatner; Philip L. Blatner đến Alyssa M. Russillio; Elliott J. Russillio, 250.000 đô la. • Đường 948 Townline, Anthony J. Syracuse; Krystina M. Syracuse đến Amanda Massino; Philip Massino, 175.000 đô la. • 84 Oxford Ave., Thomas W. Austin; Debra A. Kerl; Diane M. Whitcomb đến Leonard F. Kupkowski, $ 173.000. • 1892 Đại lộ Como Park, 6831 Seneca St. LLC đến Austin Stroh; Kelsey Stroh, 140.000 đô la. • 50 4th Ave., Thomas P Schuster Ira Ben; Công ty ủy thác vốn chủ sở hữu đối với Elizabeth Harf, $ 132.500. • Tòa án 86 Parkview, Rita M. Wascak cho Susan Collins, $ 126.000. BẢN TIN • 5926 Đường Crittenden, Robert C. Bachorski đến Barbara S. Hoddick; Charles J. Hoddick, 385.000 đô la. PHÍA BẮC • 12291 Sisson Hwy, Richard R. Ellis Jr. đến Angelo F. Smielinski, 85.000 đô la. • 5267 Langford Road, Chad J. Lucas đến Daniel V. Gallaway, 5.500 đô la. ORCHARD PARK • 3538 California Road, Phc Properties LLC đến 3538 California Road LLC, $ 1,250,000. • 5775 Big Tree Road, Christian Tv Tri-State to Bertsch Family Lp, $ 950,000. • 9 Mount Airy Court, Jarrad W. Turner; Katy T. Turner cho Jennifer G. Williams; Mark E. Williams, $ 305,000. • 75 Hillside Drive, Ann C. Fitzgerald; Timothy K. Fitzgerald cho Joseph A. Fruscione; Krista Fruscione, $ 288.900. • 30 ngõ Lane, Esther C Powell Living Trust 121713 Tr cho Mario R. Dipasquale; Melissa L. Dipasquale, $ 262.000. • 26 South Davis St., Leslie Gene Garcia; Jason M. Hamm; Phyllis M. Hamm cho Ryan Douglas Brown; Stephanie Whitfield Brown, 220.000 đô la. • 96 Minden Drive, Barbara J. Wenke tới James Kuczkowski, 166.000 đô la. • 5491 Ellicott Road, Mario R. Dipasquale tới Casey A. Kelly, 160.000 đô la. • 174 Bước chân ngõ đá, Donald C. Vollbrarou đến Bonita M. Mccarville; Terrence K. Mccarville, $ 134.500. • 5928 Armor Duells Road, Arr Holdings LLC đến Kimberly J. Bailey; Arthur P. Caprio, 90.900 đô la. SARDINIA • 10454 Lạch, Scott Walters đến Martin K. Hall Jr., $ 152.000. • 13449 Schutt Road, Carol J. George đến Aaron K. Snyder; Bethany L. Snyder, $ 147,580. MÙA XUÂN • 360 North Buffalo St., Alfred E. Fuller; Wayne Fuller; Lura J. Hoch đến Laura Colligan; Robert Colligan, 112.000 đô la. • 83 Hạt dẻ, Marjorie A. Mcknight cho Adam Filipink; Milena Filipink, 87.000 đô la. • 173-175 North Buffalo St., Mark Mcpeek đến John Mary, 50.000 đô la. THÀNH PHỐ TONAWANDA • 585 Delkn St., Rmfsg LLC đến 585 Delkn Buf LLC, $ 490.000. • 40 Fillmore Ave., 40 Fillmore Ave. Tonawanda LLC đến Jc Tonawanda Tower Qozb LLC, 300.000 đô la. • 58 Harriet St., Courtney R. Intihar đến Noah V. Martin, 134.000 đô la. • 12 Court St., Ttp Homes LLC đến Debra Ann Canfield; Patrick Michael Canfield, 106.000 đô la. • 60 Park Ave., Công ty Ủy thác Quốc gia Deutsche Bank Tr; Tín dụng cho vay vốn chủ sở hữu thế kỷ mới 2004-1 Tr to Cody Mcgregor, 73.000 đô la. • 93 Cleveland Ave., Rachael J. Weber cho Michael Zellner; Raedene Zellner, 60.000 đô la. TONAWANDA • 47 Cooper Ave., Anthony Regan; Karen Regan đến Zenmaster Ginger Ale LLC, $ 325.000. • 2740 Đại lộ Thác Niagara, Kristin A. Tisci; Hutch Motel Enterprises LLC đến Samuel Burruano LLC, $ 249,491. • 18 Đại lộ Deerhurst Park, Michele T. Sprada đến Andrea Sinh-Horowitz; Michael Horowitz, 240.000 đô la. • 216 Forbes Ave., Dena M. Ngành Oliver đến Nikko Fuller; Patricia A. Fuller, 205.000 đô la. • Đường 217 Delwar, Andrea E. Sinh-Horowitz; Michael B. Horowitz đến Lauren Morean Nowicki, $ 188.000. • Đường 276 Westgate, Eric Hensel đến Thu Kaw Moo; Elizabeth Poe Mu, 165.000 đô la. • Địa điểm 31 Alder, John F. Scherrer; Mary Scherrer; Mary Ann Scherrer cho Daniel W. Perkins, 165.000 đô la. • 1795 Đại lộ Parker, Jeffery D. Frank; Jeffrey D. Frank; Keelin Griffis đến Ashley M. Gaston; Zachary J. Holbrook, 161.000 đô la. • 310 Đại lộ Woodcrest, Jean Bryan đến Madeline B. Rohrbacher, 160.000 đô la. • 1451 Đại lộ Parker, Jovana T. Bíchler đến 1451 Parker Boulevard LLC, 155.000 đô la. • 206 Marjorie Drive, Eileen M. Brandys; Richard Brandys đến Maria Jack Santa; Jacqueline Ann Cạo, 152.000 đô la. • 343 Đường Puritan, James F. Honer; James Francis Honer; Margaret M. Honer; Margaret Mary Honer đến Valerie Ann Zielinski, 151.500 đô la. • 126 Desmond Drive, Arlene M. Bensley tới Andrea Krystina Calabrese, 150.000 đô la. A. Hội trưởng; Lisa A. Copece cho Kathleen Boland, 150.000 đô la. • 195 Hampton Parkway, Vicki A. Weber cho Jason M. Greck, 142.000 đô la. • 316 Nassau Ave., Anna A. Matracia tới Jordan P. Jozak, 137.000 đô la. • 56 Hawthorne Ave. , Carissa M. Meier; Eric Moore đến Tiffany M. Mcdonald, $ 127,617. • 33 Howard Lane, Carol Jean Wahlstrom; Gail Marie Williams đến Erin Brink; Paul Brink, 120.000 đô la. • 455 Mcconkey Drive, Raymond J. Trendle đến William F. Crittenden, 115.000 đô la. • 91 Euclid Ave., Keith W. Koons; Noel J. Koons Jr.; Richard G. Koons; Richard Gary Koons; Ronald C. Koons đến Kayla E. Lorigo, 110.000 đô la. • 164 Fairbanks Ave., Mary Miller-Kotrys đến Cheryl Passman; Dennis Passman, 109.000 đô la. WALES • 6860 Hunters Creek Road, Ronald H. Smith đến Kimberly A. Smith; Gerald Woodard, $ 325.000. • 6416 Hunters Creek Road, Amy M. Vinette đến Lecia J. Bates, 225.000 đô la. • Đất trống đường Big Tree Road, Sharon Lee Julian đến 606 Oakwood LLC, 20.000 đô la. TÂY SENECA • 175 Chancellor Lane, M & t Bank to Joseph Colern, $ 272,000. • 1199 Center Road, David Bennett đến Keenaco Inc; 158 Elmsford LLC, $ 237.500. • 38 Christopher Drive, James V. Weber; Sharon A. Weber cho Edward L. Dwyer; Kristen N. Dwyer, $ 185,000. • 132 Briarwood Drive, Michael J. Wszalek đến Roger Bettingen; Tara Michalski, $ 170.000. • Địa điểm 50 Amana, Gail A. Broad; James M. Broad đến Marc Polaron, 161.000 đô la. • 175 Tòa án Charlescrest, Albert B. Dicesare Jr.; Albert Dicesare to Amber C. Fleck, 160.000 đô la. • 60 Amana Place, Dixie Lea Blando; John S. Blando đến John K. Blando; Sabrina N. Blando, 160.000 đô la. • 110 Heather Hill Drive, Dale C. English cho Andrew Heim; Bradley Heim; Jeffrey Heim, 140.000 đô la. • 29 địa điểm Wenro, Angela Hinterberger đến Joseph V. Brown, 65.000 đô la. [ad_2] Nguồn

0 notes