Tumgik
#no divorce without husband's consent
mudwerks · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
video at link(via Steven Crowder’s Ex’s Family Shares Video of Him Berating Her for Not Fulfilling ‘Wifely' Duties)
this is the toxic bro that wants to eliminate “divorce without the husband’s consent”...  turns out he’s a total abusive asshole. WHO KNEW?
“The truth is that Hilary spent years hiding Steven’s mentally and emotionally abusive behavior from her friends and family while she attempted to save their marriage. She was the one who was asking to work on their relationship to keep the marriage intact for their unborn children,” Hilary’s family told journalist Yashar Ali in a statement, which included video footage that he shared on Twitter on Wednesday. The family further accused Crowder of being the one to instigate the divorce, claiming he wasn’t present for the birth of their children, moved out of their home, cut Hilary off financially, and hired a divorce lawyer.
The disturbing video footage shows an argument between Crowder and a very pregnant Hilary, in which Crowder refuses to let her take the car and leave the house, claiming she failed “to do wifely things.”
video at link
506 notes · View notes
mahoushojoe · 10 months
Text
i think the worst muslim demographic is the hijabi girls usually living in the US or canada with display names like "yasmeen 🦋" and "fatimah 🧿" who build entire platforms about how much life sucks for hijabis and how islamophobic the west is and "muslim girl power!!!" and sell overpriced abayas - all with zero self awareness about how much privilege they have over the muslims in the "motherland" that they shallowly idealize and ignore the problems of, blatantly erasing the narrative that YES the vast majority of muslim women are in fact forced to wear hijab- and in the same breath spout the most vile transphobic bigoted homophobic AND misogynistic shit i have ever heard under the guise of a painfully contrived victim complex where they genuinely believe that trans women are Out To Get Them Without Hijab And Turn Them Away From Islam. nobody gives a shit about you and your hijab, nobody likes you, yall are Not my allies, and i couldn't give two shits about you and i hope yall stay far far away from me because beyond spreading actually harmful rhetoric to young muslim women yall are genuinely the most annoying hypocritical and selfish type of person i can imagine
10 notes · View notes
unreliablesnake · 1 year
Note
I’ve got to know what it’s like to try and divorce Vincent. Love your work 🥰
Note: You know what? I wanted to know too. (Oh, and thank you ❤️)
Tumblr media
“I want a divorce,” you stated as you handed him the papers.
There was no malice in your voice, you did your best to keep it as neutral as possible. You were afraid of his reaction, mostly because you had a feeling he wouldn't let you get away that easily.
And just as you expected, his jaw tightened as he took the papers and looked down at them, going through each page to see what it was all about. “Marital breakdown? Really?” he asked when he reached the part about the ground for the divorce.
You could have chosen mutual consent, but because of your dear husband, you didn't expect this option to work. So you took a risk, and apparently he wasn't happy with that either. Well, you doubted he would have been happy with any reason at all.
“Just sign it. I don't want anything from you,” you added.
Vincent threw the papers on his desk and took a step closer to you. “I won't sign this, don't even think about it,” he hissed as he looked down at you, eyeing you as if you had just stabbed him in the heart and twisted the knife.
“Please, don't make this more complicated than it should be. Just let me go,” you asked him. “We don't have a child, and like I said, I don't want anything from you. This should be a walk in the park if you sign it.”
“I am not going to sign anything,” he repeated, punctuating each and every word carefully in hopes of his message finally getting through to you. “And why do you want to leave me? Do you have someone waiting for you to be free of me?”
His question surprised you, because you didn't think he would ever have doubts about your fidelity. “Don't be ridiculous, I'm not having an affair. I just had enough of this between us.”
Letting out a sigh, he leaned down to place a soft kiss on your lips. When you pushed him away, he let out an annoyed groan. “I gave you everything, mon amour, how can that not be enough for you? What more do you want?”
“I don't want anything from you, Vincent. Just sign the papers, please. I want to leave Paris tonight,” you admitted almost guiltily. You didn't want to leave so abruptly, but you simply couldn't stay here any longer.
You watched as he took a deep breath then began to pace in front of you, his hand finding its way to his hair. “Tonight? You want to leave me tonight? It's two in the afternoon!” he said, raising his voice.
“I know it's sudden, but I'm suffocating. I've been thinking about this for weeks, and–”
“Weeks?” he interrupted you angrily. “You've been thinking about ending our marriage for weeks and you're just telling me now on the day you want to leave me?”
It wasn't fair, you knew that. But you also knew that if you had given him time to process it, he would have used it to change your mind, to convince you to stay despite your decision. And he could have manipulated you until you agreed to stay with him, which you obviously didn't want.
“Just sign the papers. My lawyer will jump in to get them tomorrow,” you told him, then walked out of the room without waiting for his response.
790 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Sweet Home Alabama Masterlist
Jake 'Hangman' Seresin x OC (Linley Mitchell/Linley Floyd), Bradley 'Rooster' Bradshaw x OC (Linley Mitchell/Linley Floyd)
Status: In-Progress
Last Updated: 01/27/2024
A/N: This story does not start explicit but does get there. Minors do not interact. This story is 18+. This story is for @cherrycola27, and @thedroneranger because their unending love for the movie is what prompted me to create this AU. This will hold mostly true to the movie, but I'm going to update parts of it which I've never really liked. I hope you all love it!
Cross-posted on AO3 and Wattpad!
Themes: angst, love, smut, attraction
Summary: Linley Floyd left Pigeon Creek, Alabama and all she was, including the name she was born with, in the rear view mirror seven years ago when she moved to New York. When her boyfriend and she's sure, the love of her life, proposes, she finds herself right back in the place where everything began, Pigeon Creek, Alabama. She has to face down some old demons, and fix some broken relationships to get a divorce from her husband, all so she can marry the man she truly loves. What happens in Pigeon Creek after that proves that sometimes, home is where the heart is, even when you don't know it.
Tumblr media
Characters
Jake Seresin
Linley Floyd a.k.a Linley Mitchell
Bobby Ray Floyd
Natasha Trace
Penny Benjamin (nee Seresin)
Amelia Benjamin
Pete Mitchell
Bradley Bradshaw
Carole Bradshaw
Mickey Garcia
Reuben Fitch
Beau Simpson
Tumblr media
Lightning Never Strikes the Same Place Twice
Welcome to New York
Country Roads, Take Me Home
Home (Not So) Sweet Home
Love Conquers All (Supposedly)
The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Decisions
This Is The End (Of What Used to Be)
Trouble's More Than A Word (It's A State Of Being)
Catfish and Dog Cemeteries
Roosters and Reenactment Day
Non-Sibi Sed Patriae
A Clean Slate
A Lawyer's Lament and Deep South Glass
Shot through the Heart, But You're to Blame (You Give Love A Bad Name)
Sweet Home Alabama
Epilogue - Home is Where the Heart Is
Tumblr media
My Taglist for this fic is Open!
Want to be added to the Taglist for this fic? Leave a comment on this masterlist or drop me a message in my inbox!
PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR AGE IN YOUR BIO. I DO NOT ACCEPT TAG-LIST REQUESTS FROM BLANK OR AGELESS BLOGS. THIS IS AS MUCH FOR MY SAFETY AND LEGALITY ON THE INTERNET AS WELL AS YOURS.
Tumblr media
I DO NOT CONSENT TO HAVE MY WORK POSTED, TRANSLATED, OR PUBLISHED ON ANY SITES OTHER THAN HERE OR ON AO3 BY ME. IF YOU SEE MY WORKS ANYWHERE OTHER THAN HERE OR AO3, THEN THEY HAVE BEEN POSTED WITHOUT MY PERMISSION AND I WILL BE WORKING TO TAKE THEM DOWN.
Tumblr media
215 notes · View notes
metamatar · 2 months
Text
[...] the bill, as it stands, "criminalises and regulates constitutionally acceptable behaviours" and introduces elements of moral policing. The representatives highlight concerns about autonomy and choice, particularly regarding adult consenting cohabitation, commonly referred to as "live-in relationships". They assert that the bill's provisions would erode the hard-won rights of women and undermine their struggles for equality within both domestic and public spheres.
Critics point out that while the bill claims to offer uniformity across religious lines, it disproportionately targets the Muslim minority community, criminalising aspects of their personal and marital practices without adequately incorporating positive and progressive elements from Muslim family law. The bill's focus on rectifying perceived defects in Muslim law while ignoring similar issues within Hindu family laws has raised concerns about bias and selective application. “Majorly, it seeks to introduce changes in the provisions that are perceived as defective in the Muslim law, such as unequal inheritance, polygamy and the practice of halala ( by which a person can only remarry his divorced spouse after she has married someone else, consummated the marriage and thereafter obtained a divorce). In one sense the Bill has terminated the application of Muslim family law and has further criminalised the Muslim man and woman. Ironically, the Bill has not incorporated positive and progressive aspects of Muslim law such as the compulsory payment of mehr by the husband to the wife which provides financial security of the wife, nikahnama (marriage contract) which allows for the spouses to add legally binding conditions that are mutually acceptable, and a 1/3 limit rule for willing away property. Had the intention of the Bill genuinely been to bring about gender justice, such provisions could have been extended to women of all communities,” an excerpt from the statement reads.
Furthermore, the bill's silence on critical issues such as custody, guardianship, and adoption of children, as well as the rights of queer and transgender persons within families, has been deemed unacceptable by the women's groups. They argue that the bill's failure to address these issues reflects a lack of inclusivity and consideration for marginalised communities. Of particular concern is the retention of archaic provisions, such as the restitution of conjugal rights, which has been challenged for its constitutional validity. Critics argue that such provisions perpetuate gender-based violence and undermine fundamental rights, including the right to live with dignity and freedom of choice. The groups also maintain that this law denies or takes away fundamental rights.
Even the existing provision of women's right to reside in their matrimonial homes has been taken away. “Thus rights to equality, right to live and livelihood and to live with dignity, right to freedom of speech and expression, freedom of conscience and right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion, have become casualties under this Bill,” the statement reads.
49 notes · View notes
pinkandpurple360 · 6 months
Text
Stella is “The most evil character in the entire series” right…
Tumblr media Tumblr media
They’re very much same, and that works! They both suck. Two selfish petty spoiled brats. It’s a new dynamic we’ve never seen before. Making her the domestic abuser #189 in the series just to minimise stolas’ creepiness and shove stolitz in my poor unwilling eyeballs is bad writing
Since she is the big bad bitch 💅 the final boss of the universe apparently- stopping the beautiful holy grail it’s not rape-if-they-both-get-off Stolitz let’s morally compare her to Stolas and Blitz (this will contain spoilers!)
- Wants husband dead for cheating.
Im sorry but given how humiliated she feels and how unapologetic he is about the cheating in between wimpy excuses like ‘i couldnt find a motel’ and pretending she feels no betrayal when she’s screaming at him that she does, embarrassment is a form of betrayal this makes sense? Did she give and then get it slapped back in her face? Yes. But her motive makes sense.
She threw a silly public I hate my marriage party loudly discussing her sex life and so did he, a loud divorce party. And he discussed sex and being horny in front of his 17 year old daughter. Ignoring Blitzs non stop resistance and lack of consent. They should both be embarrassed of themselves. The main protagonist (It’s supposedly blitz by the way not stolas) is an assassin himself. Stolas has hired this exact assassin to kill plenty of people for him. I just don’t value Stolas’ life as superior to the imp lives he takes the same way that he values himself. And he’s been fine with putting Moxie and Millie “the littler ones who aren’t Blitzy” in danger many times without even acknowledging them as people. Screw this guy. In this show what Stella does is in-line with the morality considering what IMPs job is. Remember those guys?? They specialise in killing cheaters, Blitz has probably killed countless cheating husbands in and outside of hell, next!
- Loudly airs their dirty laundry about how much she hates being married to Stolas and doesn’t want to have sex with him and she’s glad she had a baby quick enough to not have to pretend to be attracted to him cause she finds him pathetic (but he actually is, anyone who abuses the weak then cries in self pity when someone his own size says something, is very pathetic)
How dare she not want to fuck him. How. dare. How dare she resent the man she was forced to marry and sleep with. Especially since. He is sex personified.
Tumblr media
Just look at that sexy face—urgh sorry I just threw up a little in my mouth.
- She tried to slap him
Yes. That is not ok. Don’t slap people.
- SO, the “appeal” of Stolas is that he is full of repressed spicy gay barely consensual racist coded desires, and he will get them at any cost. Which appeals exclusively to lovers of the forbidden fruit trope, and makes the object of his lust and many queer viewers like myself feel…sick. He loves his daughter who is becoming more miserable by the day by his neglect and (🚨!) is going to turn into angry “You can’t be with him! Gasp you love him don’t you! It’s him or me!” Elsa in the finale. I’m so sorry Octavia. Three times they’ve done this to you. Blitz literally bullies Moxie worse than Stella bullies Stolas and I am not exaggerating. Loona abuses Blitzø worse than Stella. I care more about my boy Moxie who’s only crime is being too silly sometimes. T - T Stolas however is a coward who sexually and violently preys on, condescends, and exploits those he sees as beneath him. This is mainly our main characters? Who we are supposed to root for? Who he constantly puts in harms way for his own preferences even though he has an ARMY, PROPHETIC VISIONS AND CAN PETRIFY ENEMIES
Stella finds his sexualising of imps disgusting - and she has a point—cause she’s also bigoted but honestly that’s better than having an imp sex plaything like Stolas does while maintaining the bigoted attitude that has destroyed Blitzs entire self worth—oh wait according to Seeing Stars he’s into it now ok? Oh but in Oops he’s mad at his exploitation again? BUT HE LAUGHS AT HIS GORE JOKES! Season 2 writing sucks when the feathered twig ass is involved
Tumblr media
Leave him alone… you should be an actual registered sex offender..
61 notes · View notes
thatsonemorbidcorvid · 10 months
Text
Full text below cut, trigger warning for the whole thing.
A French man has been accused of drugging his wife and the recording at least 51 men rape her while she slept over the period of 10 years.
Dominique P, a pensioner who had been married for over 50 years, allegedly mixed the anti-anxiety drug Lorazepam into his wife's evening meal, La Monde reported.
He would then invite his "guests" into their house in Mazan to rape his sleeping wife between 2011 and 2020.
A total of 51 men between the ages of 26-73 have been identified, arrested and charged with rape following an inquiry launched in 2020 in the southern city of Avignon.
The suspect reportedly found the men on “a son insu” - an active French internet forum where members discuss performing sexual acts on women without their consent and often drugged.
The exchanges on the web forum were erased after being linked to a criminal investigation into paedophile, racist or anti-Semitic content and the sale of illicit substances.
Law enforcement officials learned about the videos during a preliminary investigation three years ago when the suspect was caught trying to film woman in a changing room with a hidden camera.
The videos were found on the man's computer, where they were meticulously archived in a file called "Abuses". The titles of the hundreds of videos indicate a date, a first name and the nature of the actions, according to the French newspaper.
Investigators have identified 92 cases of sexual assault of the woman by 83 suspects, but are yet to identify all the men.
Tobacco and perfume were banned by the suspect in order to avoid strong smells that could waken his wife. The men were asked to wash their hands in warm water to avoid sudden temperature change and were made to undress in the kitchen to avoid leaving clothes in the bedroom.
The "guests" had to park near a school and walk in the dark to the house to avoid raising neighbours' suspicion.
Some claimed they had no idea his wife has not consented to the sexual acts, while one person denied it was rape, saying: “It’s his wife, he does what he likes with her.”
According to prosecutors in Avignon, the suspect insisted that "none of the men who came to his house gave up going through with sexual acts on his wife given her state".
"He never used violence or threats against anyone so that rapes would be committed. Each individual was in possession of his free will to stop these acts and leave,” the prosecutors said.
When the woman was asked to talk about her husband in November 2020 during the initial investigation, she described him as a "great guy" and "kind and caring". She said he tried to get to agree to partner-swapping but she refused as “she didn’t like to be touched without having feelings (for someone)”.
When the police informed her of the tapes, she reportedly began pieceing together the past. The woman said she had flashbacks and that the drugging could have been the reason behind her frequent fatigue and “absent-mindedness”.
Medical examinations found she had been infected with four sexually transmitted diseases.
If the investigating magistrate follows the prosecutor’s indictment, a "historic trial" is expected to take place early next year with 52 defendants in the same box.
The woman has filed for a divorce.
97 notes · View notes
olympushit · 1 year
Text
Ok, I think it's time to discuss something else that bothers me.
ARES AND APHRODITE'S RELATIONSHIP
Many people claim that Aphrodite was a vain woman that cared about superficial things rather than substantial matters. Her relationship was Ares was just a rebellion against Zeus who forced her to marry Hephaestus without her consent. BIG LIE.
Sources of many Greek philosophers(Herodotos, Nonnus) claim that Ares and Aphrodite started their relationship way long before Hephaestus arrival upon Olympus. Also, they had Deimos and Phobos before all the drama (they were thought to be their first children).
Forcing Aphrodite to marry a man against hero own will wan unethical in many fields. You can't force love or emotions. Aphrodite and Ares already had built up their lives around each other, starting creating a small family. Zeus decision isn't only about fearing a possible war between the deities for Aphrodite's hand, but also because Aphrodite was a powerful goddess who had an affair with his most hateful son, Ares. Their children personified the strongest feelings a person can feel: fear, dread, eros(love), harmony(peacefulness), pothos(longing), anteros(rejection), himeros(pleasure) and revenge-rebeliousness(Adrestia).
It's not about superficiality. It's about respecting someone's life and preferences. Aphrodite was always deemed a goddess driven by emotions, and the feeling of disrespect towards her field, love, was a straight insult to her.
This marriage was an unhappy one. Hephaestus thought that by bringing precious jewels would be enough for his wife to be loyal. He didn't actually care about her love. He only saw her as a way to be more respected in the pantheon. He was working long hours in his forge, leaving the goddess of love without what she needed the most, LOVE.
And she had found love in her husband's brother. The only god that respected the place of women, who valued consent and always was there for his lovers and children. Ares loved her deeply, because he was a rejected god too. He sought the love he was deprived from his family for eternity.
Forcing is never the option. Hephaestus was not a threat, nor the golden net incident was an act that earned him respect. Being cuckolded in his own bedroom was unfair, but trapping and bringing the lovers to the eyes of the gods was a belittling act, not for the lovers, but for him. He divorced Aphrodite according to many philosophers, but at the end love won and the lovebirds continued to love each other for eternity, bearing more and more children with sentimental natures.
Hephaestus remarried, but at the end he wasn't the victor, because he was the one who forced many people in this ordeal,and still he was unhappy.
Ares and Aphrodite had the most love-based relationship along with Dionysus and Ariadne and Eros and Psyche on Mount Olympus. They loved each other so much that jealousy was a common thing between them. Ares killed Adonis(according to some variations of the myth), and Aphrodite turned Eos into a nymphomaniac because she slept with Ares.
I don't hate Hephaestus, he seemed like a kind and very misunderstood god, but this deed was surely a big L.
At the end, Love amd War go hand by hand!
These two represented the most primal passions of the human kind, to fight and to love.
In the name of love many wars were held, and Ares and Aphrodite thrived in their existence!
119 notes · View notes
empirearchives · 7 months
Text
The Development of French Women’s Rights — according to Carla Hesse
Women’s status in relation to their husbands during the Revolutionary era:
“Legal reform, however, did not go so far as to render the civil status of married women equal to that of their husbands. This radical proposal, initiated by the legislator Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès, was definitively rejected by the Convention in 1793. So even at the revolutionary high water mark, the legal standing of married women still remained contingent to a certain extent on the will and consent of their husbands.”
Divorce and other rights in the New Regime:
“By abolishing in 1791 guild restrictions imposed by the former regime, revolutionary legislators opened all professions, including publishing and printing, to women, as long as their husbands (if they were married) consented. Prescriptive primogeniture was abolished and divorce legalized in September of 1792.”
***Divorce was legalized in September 1792, but abolished in 1816 during the Restoration after the fall of Napoleon.
Women’s status in relation to their husbands under the Old Regime:
“Under the Old Regime, in short, a married woman’s right to publish her work was contingent on her husband’s consent. She was not permitted to sign any contracts without her husband’s consent, she could not, on her own, make a legally binding arrangement with a publisher. And, if she did publish, the legal claim to her work belonged to him unless he explicitly authorized his wife to act on her own behalf.”
“Few women wrote and published under the Old Regime, and many of those who did were legally separated, unmarried, or widowed. Perhaps the two most widely read women writers of the eighteenth century, Mme de Gaffigny and Mme Riccoboni, for example, did not in fact begin their literary careers until after they were separated from their husbands.”
A conclusion from the author:
“They were denied the vote in 1789, prohibited from political mobilization during the Terror, denied civil equality within marriage.”
Source: Carla Hesse, The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern
31 notes · View notes
lexusiswriting · 30 days
Text
A love you deserve (Ricky Olson) - Part 10 of ?
Tumblr media
Hi guys!
Apparently, I got more ideas, so who knows how many parts we have left, lol. Enjoy! <3
Warnings: none.
Tags: @multifandomcrackhead, @nicelittlenightmares, @roll-tide-babe89, @skulliecadaver-blog, @21-century-tae, @melissa-anderson, @abiomens, @w743, @insanitywulf, @awkwardalex, @philomenie
Requests: OPEN.
_________________________________
“Why tell me first?”
Lexus’s point of view
That’s what I was asking myself before I did it, but now, hearing the question out loud, it was even more complicated to answer it. For the moment I felt like I could trust him with this secret, but now I realized it was a way to give me courage. Yes, the papers were already signed before he got here, but my mind couldn’t fully process that my marriage was officially done.
“Don’t think I did it so you could feel better about this situation. Or to give you any hints. You brought this up in our conversation and I had the need to let you know.”
“Do you want to talk about it? Maybe it will help you somehow.”
“It’s a lot to say, and now it’s not the time.”
“What about tonight at dinner?”
I expected him to shoot his shot, but not this fast.
“I don’t think it’s a good idea, Ricky.”
“Look, I promise you it’s not a date. We are just two friends who have a lot to catch up. And one more promise, I won’t try to do anything, without your consent, of course.”
A little laugh escaped my lips, which made his eyes shine a little with hope. That part of him that could win the heart of every woman did not change.
“Alright, I guess talking while having dinner won’t hurt us. But it’s not a date.”
“Noted. I’ll pick you up at 8.”
Ricky’s point of view
Saying that I was on cloud nine would not compare to the feelings I had at that moment. I closed the door of the office behind me, hoping it was not a dream. When I was close to the lobby, I heard a very familiar voice – it was Corey.
“Hey Ricky, didn’t expect to see you here.”
We know each other for some time now, so we were no strangers. I can’t count how many concerts or tours we did together.
“Happy to see you, man. Yeah, Motionless signed with Lexus today. We will be here a lot.”
I could feel how weird it was for the both of us. Lexus’s now ex-husband talking with her ex-friend with benefits.
“Congrats, but be careful, she will work the shit out of you.”
The whole thing was weird, and I waited patiently for him to leave me alone. But then I was stricken by a question – why was Corey here? I was trying to find something else to say, maybe to find the answer to this question, but I was glad he did it first.
“Well, I have to go now, need to get some documents from Lexus. But actually, I wanted to talk to you for a long time.”
“Talk about out?”
“There’s a lot to say, and I don’t want to risk being heard by Lexus. How about meet me at the café around the corner in 10 minutes?”
“Sure, I’ll see you there.”
He went towards Lexus’s office without adding anything else. There was nothing in my mind about what he wanted us to talk about. I get that he is upset, maybe angry with this situation, but I hoped he was not blaming their divorce on me.
________________________________
While I was waiting in the café, my mind made a lot of bad scenarios. What if he thinks she cheated on him with me? Does he know we lost contact for years, way before they got married? Did our contract make him think she knew we were coming and that’s why she signed their divorce papers today? I was truly afraid and for a moment I was about to go home, when I saw Corey coming in my direction.
“Sorry for keeping you waiting. It’s a really delicate situation.”
The only thing I did was to nod and to get a little sip from my coffee. It hasn’t been a minute yet, but my anxiety was over the top.
“I guess you know already that Lexus is going to be the star of our conversation. Don’t worry, you’re not involved in it. All I’m just trying to do is to warn you.”
“What do you mean?”
“As you were the only one to come out of the office, I’m sure she told you the news about our divorce. Again, I know you don’t have anything to do with this.”
“Yes, she said she signed the papers today.”
“Right… Let’s just say that if you want to try again with her, I don’t mind it. It hurts, of course, but if she’s happy, I will be happy for her as well. Especially because I haven’t seen her smile in a long time.”
“But she said that you both agreed to divorce. Because things were not working out between you two.”
“If it was for me, I would’ve never divorced her. I love her and our daughter with my whole being. She was the only one who thought this was the only solution.”
As I was hearing two completely different stories, I tried to see which one made more sense. Corey was devastated and even now he talked about Lexus with so much care and love, while she had no feelings left for this man.
“Look, Corey, I’m sorry for this. I never wished something like that would happen to you. The problem is, I truly don’t understand why am I here.”
“Because I analyzed everything from the moment, I met her until now. You know what I noticed? The things that happened between you two are still affecting her to this day.”
“This can’t be possible. In this case, she wouldn’t’ve married you in the first place.”
“She did it because she found in me something you did not have at the time: stability. I told her I wanted to get married, to have kids, and saw in me exactly what she wanted to have with you.”
Apparently, I was implicated in their marriage without knowing it. Maybe not even Lexus acknowledged it. I ran my hand through my hair, thinking how badly I fucked up her life.
“Ricky, listen to me. If you want her back, this time in a serious way, think really good about it first. She has a child now, my child. Fooling around is not something she would do now. Only do it if you are ready to love her and to make her happy. I don’t know if she can go through that pain again.”
“Why do you think she would actually want me back in her life?”
He laughed a little, even though he had tears forming in his eyes.
“Because she never loved me. Yes, she cared about me, but the feeling of love was reserved already by you. She married me thinking she would finally forget you, but apparently, it was not the case. Her heart is still full of you, Ricky.”
13 notes · View notes
coochiequeens · 1 year
Text
Sounds like the guy knew he was losing control of his wife so he said nothing about the termination until after so he could use it to make her life hell and possibly make money by suing her friends.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/05/04/texas-abortion-wrongful-death-countersuit/
After a Texas woman got a positive result on the home-pregnancy test she took in July, she texted two friends to discuss her options, according to a new countersuit.
A trigger law banning all abortions would take effect in her state in August, about two months following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Abortions were already illegal in Texas after the six-week mark. Another law had also made prescribing abortion pills online or mailing them to Texans illegal, which the woman and her friends discussed, the complaint states.
The woman had decided to end the pregnancy, according to the countersuit, filed in the District Court of Galveston County on Monday.
“Not questioning if this is what needs to happen,” she allegedly texted her friends. “I know it does.”
She took abortion medication on July 14, the suit states. Months later, in early March, her ex-husband filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against three women — including the two friends he said she had texted over the summer — whom he accused of being involved “in the murder of his child.”
On Monday, the two women filed a countersuit, alleging that their friend’s ex-husband was aware that his then-wife had wanted to terminate her pregnancy after he “illegally accessed” her phone without consent.
“He wasn’t interested in stopping her from terminating a possible pregnancy,” the countersuit claims.
Attorneys for the two women and the ex-husband did not respond to requests for comment. The ex-wife is not a named party in either lawsuit. Under Texas law, a pregnant patient who has an abortion cannot face criminal, civil or administrative liability or penalties.
The husband filed the original wrongful death lawsuit on March 9 in Galveston County, Tex.
In the suit, he alleged that the two friends assisted in “murdering [the] unborn child with illegally obtained abortion pills” that were acquired from a third woman. The complaint claims that the wife hid the pregnancy and had a medication abortion “without [his] knowledge or consent.”
The married couple finalized their divorce in February. The husband’s complaint states that he brought the lawsuit after he had “recently learned of the defendants’ involvement in the murder of his child.” His lawsuit was among the first of its kind since Roe v. Wade was overturned, the Texas Tribune reported.
On July 12, the husband allegedly dug through his wife’s purse without her knowledge, according to the countersuit. He found a Post-it note with the number for an abortion clinic, and he read messages on her phone between her and her two friends about her “possible pregnancy and her desire to terminate it,” according to the document, citing a police report he later filed.
The next day, he looked through his wife’s purse again, the countersuit alleges.
This time, according to the friends’ countersuit, he found a small white pill labeled “MF” and learned it was mifepristone, which can be taken to terminate an early pregnancy. The friends allege that he placed the medication back in her purse and did not say anything to her about it that day.
The wife took the abortion medication the following day, on July 14, the countersuit states. Four days later, he went to the League City Police Department to file a report about his wife’s “intent to terminate the possible pregnancy,” according to a photo of the incident report that was included in the countersuit. The man also told police he had “accessed [his wife’s] phone without her permission,” the countersuit alleges, citing the police report.
The League City Police Department did not respond to a request for comment.
After talking with police, the husband began to “threaten and try to control” his then-wife about the medication, according to the countersuit. His wife allegedly texted her friends to say: “So basically because I didn’t tell him in the first place that I was in that position he’s using it against me.”
The countersuit alleges that the husband threatened to have his wife “‘thrown in jail’ if she did not give herself to him ‘mind body and soul.’”
The friends’ lawsuit accuses the husband of violating Texas’s Harmful Access by Computer Act by reading the messages between his ex-wife and the two women, as well as taking screenshots of the correspondence without their permission.
The legislation allows Texans to sue those who have accessed a computer, computer network or computer system that they own without their consent. When the husband allegedly accessed his wife’s phone, he harmed the two friends, the countersuit claims, causing them to “suffer damages and losses.”
The countersuit also argues that the husband violated the friends’ right to privacy when he allegedly read their conversations with his then-wife.
By Praveena Somasundaram
56 notes · View notes
rockcollector3000 · 6 months
Text
Tea Time With Gaz
In the slay way
Tumblr media
Based on a headcanon of mine that this man LOVES listening to you talk shit.
Word count - 415
Warnings - swearing (?)
Becoming best friends with Sergeant Garrick wasn’t part of your agenda when you were recruited into Task Force 141.
You hadn’t realized how similar you were until people started comparing you to one another.
Then, you two started to be around each other more. So, it was just a formality to be friendly, right?
That’s what led you both up to this point. You were sitting in Gaz’s office, sliding a cup of tea over to him while you held your own in your hand.
“Gaz, you won’t believe what I heard while scouting today.” You said before taking a sip of your hot drink.
Gaz leaned forward slightly, listening closer to you. “Go on.” He said.
“Ok, so,” you started with a slight grin, “while I was doing professional eavesdropping in that cafe downtown, I heard some lady talking about her husband.”
“That’s always a fun topic.” Gaz smirked before taking a sip of his tea.
“This lady’s husband is a total prick,” you said. “Well, according to her, he is.”
You took another sip before continuing.
“This guy won’t sign divorce papers because he wants to claim the kids on his taxes!” You said, raising your eyebrows.
“What an asshole.” Gaz said, rolling his eyes. “What’s she doing about it?”
“She tried taking his ass to court, as she fucking should.” You said, talking with your hands still.
“But, because of the state she lives in, she can’t get a divorce without his consent!”
“No bloody way.” He gasped.
“I know!” You said, sounding a bit exasperated. “But she has a plan, Gaz. It’s downright dastardly. But I’m totally here for it.”
“You know, though, I do support women’s wrongs, just like I support women’s rights.” you clarified.
Gaz nodded thoughtfully.
“Awright, spill. What’s her plan?” He asked before taking another sip.
“She’s going to get screenshots of his infidelity.” You said. “But you won’t guess who he cheated on her with.”
Gaz leaned forward again, intrigued.
“Who?” He asked, clearly dying to know.
“Her fucking sister.” You said, setting your cup down.
Gaz gasped lightly, setting his cup down, too.
“You’re joking.” He said, tilting his head slightly.
“I’m not.” You said, smiling. “And honestly, Gaz, I support her fully.”
Gaz nodded again, agreeing with your agreement. “No, yeah, she's totally in the right,” he said.
“I know!” you said, picking your cup up again. “I’ve never been more invested in my life. I just hope she’s there next time I go to that cafe.”
Gaz nodded again. “You better keep me updated.” He said.
“Bitch, you know I will.” You replied, rolling your eyes playfully.
24 notes · View notes
Note
I couldn’t find the post I first saw sharing the minutes on coverture laws (it’s actually more dowery related it seems) but I managed to find the actual section! Along with Camille and Danton, I forgot Couthon also speaks on the proposal.
https://sul-philologic.stanford.edu/philologic/archparl/navigate/73/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/677/
(The proposal starts at the link but they start talking on page 674)
Thank you so much for sharing! Fun to know where these guys stood on the matter.
Thuriot — I believe that the husband alone should have right to the administration of property, and also be solely responsible for it. Very few women are going to be in a position to manage this administration. However, I would not like the right to be given explicitly by law to the husband; this law would cause discord between the spouses; and the property of women is sufficiently secured, by the mortgage of their dowry, and by the provision of the law which requires their consent for the sale of immoveables.
Lacroix — Citizens, I maintain on the contrary that the common administration must result from the community itself, and that in a free country one cannot keep women in slavery any longer. It is ridiculous that in the society of marriage a single member exclusively administers the family, and that a husband can squander at will the fortune he obtains from his wife
Merlin de Douai — If the Convention adopts the article presented to it by the committee, it would do an absurd and unjust thing, and would introduce perpetual disputes into families. I think that the woman is generally incapable of administering, and that the man has a superiority over her: nature must preserve it…
Danton — I ask that the committee above all tells us what it wants to say by its article.
Cambacérès — The committee means to say that the husband can not dispose of the property of the community without the consent of the wife.
Danton — Well, nothing is more natural.
Garnier — I ask that this proposal be enacted, and, if it has any disadvantages, that they are corrected by the law of divorce.
Camille Desmoulins — I agree. I do not want marital power, which is a creation of despotic governments, to be preserved any longer. In support of my opinion comes this political consideration: it is important to make women love the Revolution, and you will achieve this goal by making them get to enjoy their rights
Couthon — It suffices to have made a few reflections on the nature of man to be convinced that women is born with as much capacity as men; if until now that has been shown less, it is not the fault of nature, but that of our ancient institutions. I further observe that it is ridiculous to refuse the common administration of property to two spouses who can only sell it by common consent.
Thuriot — This law would be so contrary to principles, and so dangerous in its results, that foreigners would no longer wish, as long as it existed, to have commercial transactions with the French. This law would enslave and degrade the man by putting him under the guardianship of the woman. The administration of trust given to her by her husband honors her more than the right she would hold from this law. Moreover, it is important to deeply meditate upon this question. I therefore ask that it be adjourned for three days.
The adjournment is decreed.
30 notes · View notes
Text
Sweet Home Alabama
Tumblr media
Series Pairing: Linley Floyd (Mitchell) x Jake ‘Hangman’ Seresin, Bradley ‘Rooster’ Bradshaw x Linley Floyd (Mitchell)
Series Warnings: Infidelity, Mentioned Miscarriage, Lying
Series Masterlist
Tumblr media
INTRODUCING: REUBEN FITCH
Reuben's wanted to be a lawyer for most of his life. It's a goal he's devoted decades of his life to achieving, and now that he's achieved it, he's not resting on his laurels. No, he's going to fight to get his clients what they want, to serve them to the best of his abilities. And it's a goal he's attained without protracted struggle. Until that is, he met Linley Floyd, or should he say, Linley Mitchell. Linley's been his client for seven years. And unless she's paying a retainer, that's out of the ordinary. The only thing she wants, the only thing she needs, is a divorce. Normally divorces are a few month affair, not years unless husband and wife have a lot of property or a family they're disputing over. Linley and Jake are different. How different, Reuben doesn't see until he finds himself in Pigeon Creek, Alabama of all places.
Tumblr media
I DO NOT CONSENT TO HAVE MY WORK POSTED, TRANSLATED, OR PUBLISHED ON ANY SITES OTHER THAN HERE, ON WATTPAD, OR ON AO3 BY ME. IF YOU SEE MY WORKS ANYWHERE OTHER THAN HERE, ON WATTPAD, OR AO3, THEN THEY HAVE BEEN POSTED WITHOUT MY PERMISSION AND I WILL BE WORKING TO TAKE THEM DOWN.
Tumblr media
Taglist:
@sarahsmi13s @atarmychick007 @the-romanian-is-bae @lt-spork @buckysdollforlife @blackwidownat2814 @praline357 @seitmai @cheyrenee @trickphotography2 @abaker74 @marrianena-library @angelbabyange @temptest13 @kmc1989 @im-an-adult-ish @chaoticassidy @inkandarsenic @lynnevanss @shanimallina87 @khaylin27 @mizzzpink @mayhemmanaged @desert-fern @cassiemitchell @horseshoegirl @teacupsandtopgun @dakotakazansky @thedroneranger @roosterforme @mak-32 @beyondthesefourwalls
18 notes · View notes
zairawasim · 1 year
Text
Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen رحمه الله said:
“What appears to me is that from a disciplinary point of view of the present time, the father is to be absolutely stopped from marrying his daughter until she reaches puberty.
And she is to be asked for her permission (for marriage).
A lot of things happen, because they do not take into account the interest of the girl, rather they only take into account the interest of themselves.
There are many women who were married by their fathers without their consent.
And when she came to know and the husband disturbed her she asked the household to get her a divorce from him or she will burn herself. This happens many times because the household do not understand the interest of their daughter rather they see their own benefits. For me, this (practice of marrying underaged minor girls who have not crossed puberty) should be prevented/stopped at the present time, and every era has its own rulings.”
[Sharh Saheeh al Bukhari, Kitab an-Nikah, Chapter 39]
105 notes · View notes