sooooo, latest video
Well... it seems like there is a video XD
Jokes aside, thanks anon for letting me know Mr. Sanders posted a video that was Sanders Sides related. Kudos for that <3
Then... I have some thoughts about this video. Thoughts I will divide into pros and cons, to make everything easier to explain.
If you donât like long posts or reading criticism of any kind, please save yourself (and myself) some time and ignore this post. I wonât get offended, I promise.
__________________________________
PROS
A real Aside
It looks like Thomas finally learned the difference between Asides and main episodes. It took him three years, but he finally realized that the Asides should be simple, no plot-related stuff. Good to see he finally got it.
(Still donât understand why ATHD is a main episode, tho. Itâs not plot-related and itâs very clearly more low-effort than FWSA and DWIT. Maybe Thomas didnât want to leave it all by itself?)
-------------------
Some hopes for the characters
I was very relieved to see that the charactersâ personalities are not completely butchered. There are a few things I will talk about in the cons section, but the overall vibe has stayed more or less the same. Iâm especially relieved Virgil isnât the fratboy he was in Thomasâ latest Instagram post, in which he talked all fratboy-esque and I almost expected him to bully me and steal my lunch.
The most in characters are Janus and Remus, which is nice to see too. Remus in particular, is still a chaotic rat man and I love him so much.
-------------------
Remus is my chaotic child
I personally think the best part of the whole video is Remus saying the others told him he could kill Bing Bong. I laughed so hard, I had to stop the video. That wonderful, chaotic rat man deserves to kill everything, as a treat <3
But actually, everything Remus says is great and that proves heâs the best, in this essay I will-
__________________________________
CONS
A weird start
Let me recap my experience while watching the video for the first time.
So, the video starts and Iâm welcomed by this guy with an orange shirt and blue hat, all happy and excited. For a split second, I think heâs Patton⌠but then, a Patton-esque guy with a sweater appears.
Okay, now Iâm confused because I have no idea whatâs happening here and donât know who these guys are - I mean, if sweater guy is Patton, who is the orange guy? The orange side was introduced and I missed it? Whatâs happening here? Who are they? Are those the Inside Out characters as seen by Thomas? Will these guys meet their Sanders Sides âcounterpartsâ?
But then another guy appears and he looks like Janus, so now Iâm really lost because, seriously, who are these people? They call each other by name so they should be the Sides, but they also call the orange guy âJoyâ, so who is this guy? Who are they? Are they the Inside Out characters cosplaying the Sides? Or vice-versa? Whatâs happening here?
I got my answer, only when Virgil appeared and clarified this was all a weird roleplay.
I have several questions:
Was it really necessary?
Why?
No, seriously, why? The Sides are the first to admit they arenât an exact match to the Inside Out characters, so why doing this? Why flatten their multifaceted roles and personalities to do this? Because Mr. Sanders isnât able to handle them?
Okay, fine, I know why Mr. Sanders wanted to do this weird roleplay and it couldâve been fun to see the Sides acting as the Inside Out characters⌠if only the Sidesâ personalities stayed the same. But since their personalities are not the same anymore, all the viewers feel are confusion and a weird sense of âsomethingâs wrong hereâ, which they canât exactly pinpoint.
-------------------
Wrong aesthetics and confused personalities
In order to explain this point, I will bring two examples: Janus and Roman.
First of all, Janus. I know, heâs our beloved sassy queen and we all love him⌠but his aesthetic in this episode was completely wrong.
Janus is a character who wears layers upon layers of clothing. Thatâs the first thing you get, the first thing that characterizes him. But in this episode, he wears nothing but a gilet and a scarf. He shows with bare arms, bare shoulders, a deep V-neck and doesn't wear his gloves: for his standard, heâs basically naked.
You can tell me: âIt was to match Disgustâs dressâ. But since Remus put his own color on the costume, why couldnât Janus put his own twist too? Heâs not doing a perfect cosplay after all. So why not wear a sheer shirt underneath the gilet, to mimic the ânakednessâ without showing his skin? Or a greenish/yellow shirt to match both his and Disgustâs aesthetic? I know Mr. Sanders loves to show his skin, but since he created a character whose aesthetic is to not show skin, why âstripâ him just to show some more skin? Did Mr. Sanders forgot this aspect of Janusâ character?
But if Janus had at least his face and personality to remind us who he is, Roman had nothing. Seriously, look me in the eye and tell me that, when you saw that guy in orange, you immediately thought: âAh yes, here is Romanâ. There was no way to recognize him, because he had nothing of Roman.
First of all, not a single drop of red anywhere. And I know, roleplay and whatever⌠but Mr. Sanders is a theater man. He knows the importance of colors. He created seven characters by associating a color to each of them. And yet, Roman appeared without a drop of red, while Remus had no problem turning Fearâs sweater into green.
That doesn't mean Roman had to turn full red, but he could wear a red accessory at least: a bracelet, a necklace, a pin on his hat, whatever. Loganâs tie was blue after all. Or wasnât Roman allowed to put a twist on his cosplay? This weird roleplay session gives me more questions than answers :/
Second (and most important), Romanâs personality was nowhere to be found. This guy is a more obnoxious, forced version of Roman. When he talked, I didnât see a person talking: I saw Mr. Sanders reading a script. Or better, screaming a script. Seriously, why was he so loud? Why was he screaming this much, during the roleplay session? I almost got a headache and I donât get headaches so easily. Seriously, if I needed to hear him louder, I couldâve turned up the volume of my computer, no need to scream this much.
-------------------
The makeup and the importance of details
The dark sidesâ makeup has been butchered.
Remusâ eyeshadow used to be of a deep dark black/blue/purple. So why is it so light? Because of the roleplay? But itâs still light after the roleplay. What happened, did Thomas finish the eyeshadow? Itâs not too expensive, canât he buy some more?
Same goes for Virgil: his eyeshadow is basically non-existent. And thatâs even weirder, considering that in the Christmas episode, he said he wanted darker makeup to match the darkness of his soul. Does that mean his soul isnât dark anymore?
And then, Janus. My poor, beloved Janus. His makeup used to be impressive, with scales of a deep green/yellow/brown hue: now they look more like a weird, yellow-y rash, with a thin black line crossing them (probably made with an eye pencil?).
I know Thomas doesnât have the same makeup artist, but experts exist. And if the one he has isnât doing their job well, then Iâm sorry, but he should hire another one. Thatâs not being mean, thatâs being real.
And before any of you says: âThatâs just a detail, youâre being nitpickyâ... sure, you can see it like that. But letâs say someone gives you a cake and when you see it, there are missing decorations, the fondant doesnât fully cover the cake and the phrase âHappy birthdayâ is wonky. And when you eat it, it has a weird aftertaste too. Sure, it was a gift, but would you think âThat was the best ever!â or would you think âThanks, but you couldâve spent a little more time making it betterâ?
Heck, you can apply the same concept with this post too! If I posted something with incorrect grammar and misspelled words, would you be happy? Or would you think âman, you couldâve spent a couple more minutes to correct itâ?
Skipping details doesnât make me think you care about your work: it makes me think that either youâre lazy or donât really care. And if youâre okay with something with missing details, good for you. But from someone with a certain degree of expertise/professionalism like Mr. Sanders, I expect something professional too.
-------------------
Subtle vs thrown in your face
I enjoy the âJanus being a wine momâ thing: itâs funny, it makes me smile, poor boy dealing with the little shits he has around, please give him wine.
But you know whatâs really funny about this? That itâs subtle. It happens once in a while. Itâs not thrown in the face. And itâs not thrown in the face like that, with Sides luring Janus with wine, almost as if heâs an alcoholic and you can use wine to make him do anything.
Also because the whole âJanus loves wineâ thing doesnât work too well with the functions he embodies. I mean, this guy is responsible for lies. Do you really think lies and alcohol work well together? You need to be extremely lucid and focused to be a good liar. And I donât think I have to explain to you why alcohol and self-preservation donât work well together either.
So seeing him with a glass once in a while is funny, but seeing him being all like âyou promised me wineâ as if wine is his drug⌠thatâs not funny.
Speaking of things that are funny when not thrown in the face, letâs talk about âfalsehoodâ too.
Just like the wine, falsehood was funny when it came once in a while. It wasnât a switch you could press and bam, Logan says âFalsehood!â. It was a momentarily outburst because Loganâs main reaction isnât to yell: Loganâs main reaction is to explain things by using cold logic. Because thatâs who he is: logic.
So, when I see him dropping a âfalsehoodâ like this, I donât enjoy it. I feel it old and stale. And it saddens me too, because it looks like Thomas is using the easiest bait to get his fansâ attention. A bit like a bunch of dangling keys: see? Your favorite character says his catchphrase! Now laugh!
-------------------
Apollo gave me the gift of prophecy (or maybe it was just too obvious this would happen)
Right after Roman stops screaming, Virgil starts screaming. And he does it in the most out-of-character way, for the most out-of-character reason.
Since the Q&A episode from season one, Virgil was the first one to tell Thomas that Anxiety looks different for anyone and that he specifically chose the dark persona to keep âeveryoneâs guard upâ.
So why is he complaining so much about a movie representation of Anxiety now? And why should everyone remind him that hey, Anxiety looks different for everyone? He should already know that. He was the first to tell that.
Do you know what this is? No, not a pathetic excuse to talk about a trending topic (i.e. Inside Out). Itâs proof I was fucking right and of course I was, because I experienced it too.
What did I say in my old post about the problem with this series? That SaSi doesnât have an outline. And what happens when you donât have an outline and, instead of focusing on that project/writing an outline, you do 20 other different things instead? That more time will pass. And the more time will pass, the more you will forget things you already talked about.
Like, you know, a topic from season 1 that was clarified, over and done by the same character who now forgot it.
-------------------
The golden goose will never die
Call me a conspiracy theorist or just an old hag with a heart of stone. But I really would like to know the real reason why, deep down, Thomas made this video.
I doubt it was because he missed the Sides and wanted to do something with them. He doesnât miss them the slightest, itâs quite clear. He doesnât even care enough to remember what their personalities are supposed to be, how can he "miss" them?
But oh look, there was new merch to advertise. And Inside Out is a trending topic and the fandom knows about the association between SaSi and the movie. So if Mr. Sanders makes the right video at the right time, he can get a lot of views with minimal effort.
But he should advertise a shirt with all Sides in, so he canât just make a video about Virgil reacting to a trailer: he needs all of the Sides to be there. So, letâs rush a video with the first idea that popped into his mind: that Virgil doesnât like the Inside Out take on Anxiety.
Maybe thatâs not what truly happened in his mind and behind the scenes. Maybe Mr. Sanders really just wanted to make a video with the Sides and Iâm a cynical, heartless person. Personally, I would be way happier to know I was wrong and there werenât ulterior motives behind this video.
But without any actual proof, I wonât believe this video was made just for passion. Passion doesnât make you skip details. Passion doesnât make you put on a sloppy video, without taking two more minutes to check if your characters are IC or the topic you want to talk about makes sense.
Believe me, Iâm very sad to say this. I donât want to think all of this. I always try to be optimistic and think good of people. But if this is what I get, how can I believe this video was made with good intentions and no ulterior motives? Especially since itâs coming from a guy who can be accurate, detail-oriented, and very subtle while acting? He did all of this in the past: now it looks like he forgot everything.
If you want to still watch this Aside, do it. If you enjoy it, even better. For me, that was just a tiny waste of time and it left me nothing except a momentary smile. At the end of the day, I donât even care enough to watch it twice. And for me, that's a failure, coming from a series I used to watch on repeat.
130 notes
¡
View notes
I think I perfectly know what youâre talking about, so let me tell you some trivia.
When someone acts very defensive about something, in Italy we say that they have âla coda di pagliaâ (which can be translated as âthey have a straw tailâ). This saying comes from an old tale of a fox, whose tail was cut off by a trap. The animal was so ashamed, that its friends decided to give it a straw tail, so beautiful that anyone could never have suspected it was fake.
But one day a rooster let this secret slip away and once the peasants knew about the straw tail of the fox, they lit fires near the chicken coops, so that the fox could no longer steal their chickens anymore: straw catches fire very easily and so the fox was forced to stay away.
From this story comes the expression âhaving a straw tailâ, which means fearing any kind of criticism for a behavior they are well aware of. If you have a straw tail, if you have bad behavior or did something wrong, you know it. And so, you act defensive to hide it.
Thomas is doing exactly that. Heâs getting very defensive over simple questions, heâs making childish excuses in a desperate attempt to show how good he is, but all heâs doing is showing us he knows heâs in the wrong.
So here are the tweets you (probably) wanted me to talk about and yes, I will talk about them both (special thanks to @transfemloganââ who posted them on Tumblr first).
Those are both very recent tweets, but letâs start with the first one dated October 2022:
Okay, letâs recap everything Thomas did wrong here.
1) That person was not pressuring nor threatening him. They asked a simple, genuine question and they did it very politely and very calmly. This wasnât an angry fan. And yet, Thomas went in full passive-aggressive mode, as if that person was insulting him. This is the best example of what âhaving a straw tailâ means.
2) âKeeping people postedâ means giving real updates, not a vague âworking on the scriptâ written months ago. It means telling people how much has been written, if heâs close to the end or not, how long he thinks it will take to reach the end, what his plans are, even if heâs just working on the actual script or not because heâs doing other stuff. Those are updates.
3) âUpdating to the extent that I feel comfortable doingâ is just a more convoluted way to say âI do not have any real update, so I am giving you crumbs, because this is all I haveâ. But heâs hiding it behind the excuse of âIâm taking care of myselfâ, which couldâve worked years ago, but after three years itâs not so convincing anymore.
4)Â Pressuring someone to deliver content is not healthy nor productive, but if someone is clearly doing nothing, some pressure makes the work done. As a writer, I learned long ago that, if I want things to get done, I have to do them. I wonât enjoy the whole process and there will be times I donât really want to do it, but itâs the only way to do stuff. You canât wait forever for the inspiration to come because, flash news, it wonât magically fall from the sky.
And sure, taking care of yourself is important too, but using your well being as an excuse to always postpone is just laziness.
5) Since Mr. Sanders is thirty-three years old and not five, I think he is old enough to accept someone asking him what is going on with the season finale and not overreact like he did. I could understand if he was a teen, but when youâre 33 youâre old enough to deal with something as simple as a question.
Oh and since Iâm here talking about this post and since Mr. Sanders didnât do it, I would like to formally apologize to the person who wrote that question. You did nothing wrong, dear. Your question was valid and polite and I am sure that another, more mature person wouldâve given you the proper reply you deserved.
And if any of you is curious, would you like to know what the real answer to that question was? âThe season finale is not here at all, because I am barely working on the script. And I am barely working on the script, because I donât know how to handle it. And I donât know how to handle it, because I am not a writer - but I want to write it anywayâ. Hereâs your answer, youâre welcome.
Believe me, I hope to be proven wrong, but this is what I got from Thomasâ over-the-top reaction. And if any of you think I am too hard on him, then sorry again, but it pisses me off to see a grown-ass man whining like a child because someone just asked him something he doesnât want to talk about.
And here is the second tweet, dated December 2022:
Not only this is another textbook example of what âhaving a guilty conscienceâ means, but Mr. Sandersâ reply is - if possible - even more childish: I work very very hard! See how hard I work? I am right and you are wrong! And If you keep saying these bad things, I will tell mom.
In addition to that, he wasnât even clever enough to turn the topic away from him. That person said that his supporters got nothing in turn and are more excited than him? He couldâve said that this was offensive towards his supporters, because if they are trusting him itâs not because heâs forcing them to do it, but because they like what heâs doing and want him to create these things heâs passionate about. But nope, he was too butthurt and he clearly knew that person was right, so he overreacted like a child.
This also proves that, sadly, he doesnât believe his supporters are following him out of trust or because they like everything heâs doing. Heâs probably very aware that the reason most people are following him is Sanders Sides - and that puts him in a difficult situation.
Why? Because heâs not able to handle the series. And heâs aware of it: he knows heâs taking too long with the script, he knows there are no real updates, he knows he has nothing to give. And yet, this series is his main income: there are people, merch, contracts. He canât just drop or cancel it.
And so he keeps everything as vague as possible. If everything is vague, people will still trust him, they will think heâs working on the series and patiently wait for the next episode.
This can work with kids. But when kids grow up or teens grow tired, they start to rightfully ask questions. And if you donât have answers, you end up replying like this - thus involuntarily showing how aware you are of your situation.
And now, letâs take Sanders Sides out for a moment, because this isnât about the series, but about him.
This behavior is very, very disrespectful. Adults should be an example for younger people, they should be someone the next generation will look at and take inspiration from, to grow into even better adults. We canât pretend kids are better than us, if we are not the first to show them how to be better.
Thomas isnât just an adult, but a public figure, so heâs not just an example for his friends or relatives: heâs an example for a lot of people. He should show them what a proper, mature, adult reply is. What he did instead was attacking with a lot of passive-aggressiveness an innocent fan who just asked a question and a more sarcastic one, who just poked him.
Do you know what he couldâve done instead? Not reply at all. Or just grow a pair and reply like an adult. He couldâve thanked the first fan and said that, unfortunately, there are no real updates on Sanders Sides for now, because heâs working on other stuff - and added that he hopes they will like this stuff too. While to the second person, he couldâve said that people are following him for more than just Sanders Sides and that heâs sorry that person thinks he did nothing, because he worked on different things. Was it so hard to do?
This is not a good way to handle criticism. And I hope he will grow up a little: all he did now was showing us how long his straw tail is and how easily it catches fire.
266 notes
¡
View notes