incel-marxism - Tumblr blog

incel-marxism · 1 year

Text

Men will never have rights under capitalism

Why I oppose to Men's rights movement

Source

The later remains true. Even women who are breadwinners keep doing most of the household chords. Men who stay at home sit in their asses and play lol.

Men's rights movement father.

Ernest Belfort. The fraud of feminism, chapter two.

George Eliot was a woman.

Women are not human, they are a sex.

The rest of the chapter states that women are inferior (dumb, hysterical, weak)...

And four chapters later five minutes later he complains about laws who infantilize women and holds men in charge of the household.

Do you remeber that study about chinese women working more that males(? And how that occur because of the patrilocality(? Well...Belfort thinks, as every fucking male, that men work harder because muh penis.

He dares to say that women are inferior and then he states that women are stronger than men.

Instead of recognize women as different and not inferior, he prefers to state that women are inferior in every aspect and whine "is unfair if society holds the belief that males are physically superior than females :(".

Is bad when society follows his own logic and then prefer to infantilize women. Is bad and unfair when society follows the belief that women are the weaker sex (as if he himself stated before) and acts accordingly. He wants to have his cake and eat it too. He wants that those Stupid feminists understand women as inferior and weaker, but at the same time wants that those Stupid feminists shut their mouths about it and focus on the poor baby men who die more.

Is better that than recognize that females are different humans, not inferior, not "a sex". And if women have their disadvantages, men have them too.

It is against any logic. If you state that a group of people is inferior and other superior, for what group people will feel more empathy? Even if it is in a sexist manner, people will feel more empathy towards women and, in this case, will infantilize them and ignore every fact that challenge the narrative that they are the inferior sex and men the superior sex. There you have it, Belfort, people followed your vision and then ignored cheerfully that men died more.

It's the same audacity that anti-feminists have. It's strangely familiar. Women are dumber and weaker and inferior if they demostrate to be different from men. But at the same time: look at those poor baby males who die in their jobs, look at those poor baby males (who are, according them, smarter and stronger) victims of domestic violence, look how their 4'9 feet tall wife beat them boo hoo.

How will women feel empathy and pity for men who with the same breath affirm they are superior to women and support people/groups who state that and then say that poor baby men they have problems too and feminism don't care :(

And it's the same attitude of TRA's when we tell them that women are different from men. We have to contemplate how some of them say, trying to be funny, "Trans women are better than women even in the task of being women". Affirming again that men are superior.

Women are dumb, inferior, they don't work as hard as men. They are not humans, they are a sex. They are objects of desire. They belong in the kitchen and how dare they wanting to have rights? But at the same time is: boo hoo, is unfair if women stay in the kitchen, is unfair if women keep their children, is unfair if laws judge them as less adults and less humans. Women are lazy and their work is messy, and men are hard workers and do everything right. Now, women, why don't you feel pity for those poor baby males who die in their jobs? :(

My conclusion is obvious.

The masculinism of the founding father of MRA is ridiculous and cannot stand up in society.

If society heeds Belfort and believes that women are inferior, society will act accordingly. It cannot be held that women are inferior, but at the same time they should get the same consequences and the exact same treatment that men get. You cannot maintain that men are superior in every respect, and at the same time expect every weak aspect of men to be the subject of popular concern.

It is the last straw to expect society to believe that men are better in everything and women inferior and at the same time to want all kinds of attentions and benefits for men when things are not in their favor. It is literally wanting everyone to be at the service of men in every aspect, not only in recognizing their strengths and merits (their own or stolen from women) but in recognizing their weaknesses.

And obviously, as a good masculinist, Belfort conveniently ignores that men commit more crimes than women. That's another thing, Belfort disavows women's capabilities, says they are hysterical and deficient, and states that there is no point in giving them rights. But at the same time he doesn't put any buts on men, even though they commit more crimes than women.

He even goes so far as to say that men are morally better; an argument I am no stranger to masculinism. But even if that is true, that women have less capacity for moral reasoning and men have more rectitude in that regard, that still leaves men in a worse position, since they are the ones who commit more crimes. They, knowing better what is right from wrong than women, choose to do wrong. Such a question is not raised in The Fraud of Feminism, no male defect makes it valid to consider denying them any rights.

Belfort complains about how the courts punish women less harshly and men more harshly. But again, if women are inferior and all their productions are of inferior quality to that of men, why should judges judge women, who are considered mentally and emotionally deficient, the same as men?

It is legitimate to recognize that men are better in everything and that they suffer more in everything. But it is not legitimate to think that they are more harmful, dangerous and destructive than women.

That's enough to refuse.

But there is more, I flat out reject masculinism and the idea of supporting men in anything because of the popularity of anti-women ideologies on both sides of the political spectrum. It is the last straw that we are denied our biological reality on the one hand, and on the other that an ideology is raised against women that attempts to paint men as superior in every way and women as incompatible with civilization.

No, I do not want men to have the privilege of denying our biological reality, the privilege of being recognized as superior beings and also the privilege of being seen as the main victims in everything.

*Obviously, nowadays this is quickly circumvented with the idea that men are feminized, undirected by being raised by single mothers and therefore commit more crimes. Or that any statistic is feminist propaganda. Ignoring all evidence that in the animal world the same pattern of more male violence is repeated.

*It is obvious that many will say that Belfort does not represent masculinism. But he is considered the father of masculinism by relevant figures within MRAs such as Paul Elam and his ideas are very familiar to anyone who talks to a 21st century masculinist. Knowing it or not, they are making similar points to Belfort. Moreover, I attest that Belfort is regarded that way by both Anglo and Hispanic masculinists.

#incelcore #incel #socialism #marxism #communism #capitalism

53 notes · View notes