Tumgik
rexalogy · 8 minutes
Text
youtube
0 notes
rexalogy · 42 minutes
Text
explorerz is a terror world where symbolic act is always inextricable from material act
8 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 4 hours
Text
Tumblr media
Gnarpy
27 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 6 hours
Text
Tumblr media
26 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 11 hours
Text
Tumblr media
time to go to work now. help! someone help me!
21 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 12 hours
Text
Tumblr media
mackanoodles court sentence age 5
71 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 12 hours
Text
picking up alison bechdels “are you my mother?” again. had to drop it for a moment because a big part of this book is the anxiety of weaving narrative and meaning into her relationship with her mother, most of which ends up centered around the OCD that her mother has potentially instilled into her. too relatable. too much.
10 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 12 hours
Text
Tumblr media
16 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 13 hours
Text
Tumblr media
work shopping
67 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 13 hours
Text
Do not go to my grave and weep you are so annoying
45K notes · View notes
rexalogy · 13 hours
Text
WIIIIIIPPPPPPPPPP
Tumblr media
7 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 23 hours
Text
In My Infancy
I Would Indulge Myself
In Wild Bouts Of Play.
Whipping Grapes At The Wall As Hard As Possible
And Watching Their Taut Skins Snap Open
Wet Streaks On The Concrete Walls
Of My Enclosure.
How I Yearned
To Be That Grape.
780 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 1 day
Text
it’s always cool when a place is a premier date spot for horny teenagers and horny 40 year olds alike. you’re rubbing up on her? at the plush horse ice cream parlor?
16 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 1 day
Text
Tumblr media
break up with Rex
34 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 1 day
Text
lesbians hatch from eggs
12 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 1 day
Text
there is a gnawing hole in me, a frustration longheld, the reason American cartoons have always been offputting - their obsession with sexual dimorphism is pathological. in the tags of the last post I mentioned that their way of making non-human cultures be analogous to real world analogous cultures is so forceful. their inclusion of “girl” “boy” non-humans is presented as an unspoken fact of reality. ita supposed to just make sense! this decontextualization of sex from its ideological basis is supposed to validate its existence - there is no reason for this, it just is. even as a kid it’s impossible to not pick up on this pervasiveness. but I think this is double-edged - because of the lack of justification, no backing, some viewers will think “oh well there really is no reason for something to be this way, huh? It’s all a bad joke, huh?” the cartoonishness of sex ends up overemphasized and therefore falsified.
30 notes · View notes
rexalogy · 1 day
Text
blake doesn’t want to accept this hypothesis of mine because he wants to believe the cars do actually have organism style sex but my idea was that the cars experience erotic pleasure but do not reproduce sexually (a car comedically exclaims “thank the manufacturer!” at some point in the movie which I’ve taken to mean that cars are built by other cars instead of birthed. I guess this could mean that god exists for real also - because who is mandating these productions? are there going to be a certain amount of porsches mandated by the government? i think the cars universe is more likely to explain this with divine influence). Rather than certain acts being understood as inherently sexual i think this “erotic pleasure” is very dependent on the context of the acts - driving, having parts changed, showing off vulnerables.
these acts can both equally be erotic and nonerotic so there is a high need for declaring intentions. which might explain the social necessity for sexual dimorphism if there is no reproduction. There are no human sex acts involved, just thrills and bonding acts (mostly?) decontextualized from reproduction.
raises many questions such as: is the cars universe ontologically homophobic if it’s so dependent on sexual dimorphism to communicate sexual nonreproductive desire? i want to say yes but obviously for different reasons than our culture … because I’m sure the cars have easy quick accessible sex changes (being as they are machinery). as aforementioned, because the sexual dimorphism exists mainly as preference flagging - i think “female” and “male” here (of course derived from our real-world cultural standards) occupy the exact spaces of “submissive” and “dominant” and even “do-e” and “doer”. being as the car culture has a strong emphasis on competition.
27 notes · View notes