#maybe i will make some polls in the upcoming days to help determine the future of this blog | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

todaydreambelievers · 5 years

Text

TDB Rewatch: Feud (4x16)

Welcome to Season 4! This week we’re doing Feud!

For the first time in Glee Club history, the students give the teachers an assignment, "Feud." After Finn reveals to Will that he kissed Emma, things get way out of hand. As this feud finds its ways to be solved, Finn eventually chooses a path that will shape his future. With the feud assignment set, it starts up more feuds, between Ryder and Unique and also between Blaine and Sue. Ryder, with a new online love interest, is asked to back-off Marleyas he ruined her and Jake's relationship. Unique also has problems with people identifying her as a boy while Sue is determined to force Blaine back into the Cheerios to help her win upcoming Regionals, unaware that Blaine commences a plot to end her terror at the school. In New York though, Santana gets right down to the bottom heap and digs out Brody's secret, turning out he isn't who she really thought, leading to a new feud and Kurtand Rachel making a final decision based on her actions.

The episode is directed by Bradley Buecker and written by Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa.

Sundays: Pretty much the kick off day for the week, and also where Meta Monday and First Listen Friday are distilled into. So – do that rewatch, dust off that old meta, listen to that music again, then write about it and put it in the tags!

Tuesdays: Will remain the poll, the results will be on Saturdays as usual.

Thursdays: Will remain TBT – and I encourage you to post the gifsets, old interviews, memes, and fanfics – anything related to the episode.

Instead of doing a round up – tag with “tdb rewatch” “todaydreambelievers” or “spaceorphan18″ and I’ll reblog it here so everyone can take a look at it. Also - have any prompts for fanfics related to the episode, or headcanon kickstarters? Feel free to tag me, too, and maybe we can get some good discussions going. I hoping that by reblogging - it’ll start more conversations and/or get things moving a little more than things were in season 1.

As usual - don’t feel bound to my schedule - if you have something from season 1 you’d like to have out there, still tag me! I’ll reblog it with the correct episode tag.

#tdb rewatch #tdb rewatch feud

4 notes · View notes

ericvick · 3 years

Photo

This election 'will determine the destiny of our nation': Reverend Willie Bodrick, II

Reverend Willie Bodrick, II joined Yahoo Finance to discuss his thoughts on the upcoming Presidential election and what it means for the future of the country.

Video Transcript

SIBILE MARCELLUS: Welcome back to “2020, A Time for Change.” I’m Sibile Marcellus. Both President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden say they’re fighting for the very character and future of this nation. But what does saving America look like once the smoke clears after November 3? Where does that leave the millions of Americans who lost their jobs as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and still can’t find work?

Joining us now is Reverend Willie Bodrick. He is a senior pastor at the 12th Baptist Church Historic in Massachusetts. Now Reverend, you are deeply involved in this election. You’re a senior advisor to Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey, who’s up for re-election. Should Americans vote with their wallets? And who would help us get a faster economic recovery, President Trump or Joe Biden?

WILLIE BODRICK, II: Well, thank you for having me. And I think Americans should not just vote with their wallets, but they should be voting with their hearts, with their conscience. It was John Lewis who said that the vote is the most powerful nonviolent change event that you– that we have in our democratic society. And this election, I really do believe, will determine the destiny of our nation.

And this could be the difference for so many, as we know, between life and death. There’s no joking about this matter because 9 million people, to this point, have contracted COVID-19. 228,000 people have lost their lives. And their families will never be able to see them again. And disproportionately, Black, brown, and low income communities have felt the brunt of this.

And so I think we have to also not only think about what’s happening with us economically, but what we’re doing each and every day as we live in community with one another. And I believe that is what’s going to be most important. I believe Joe Biden does have the best plan moving forward to make sure that we are getting back on the right track.

Story continues

But I think it goes beyond economics. We’re talking about economics, but we’re also talking about healthcare. We’re also talking about the environment. We’re also dealing with so many issues as it relates to state action violence against Black bodies. And so I think Americans are going to the voting booth. They’re thinking critically more so about every aspect of their life, and not just their wallets when they go in.

SIBILE MARCELLUS: In a June radio interview, you said that the country needs to repent. And you said this around the time that there were George Floyd protests happening in Boston. Is it your belief that President Trump or Joe Biden needs to repent?

WILLIE BODRICK, II: Well, I think all of– America needs to repent. I mean, when I said that in that interview, I meant seriously that we have continued a cycle of violence against Black bodies. And this is rooted in what I believe is systemic racism. And I think both the president, who has continued to stoke the racial climate in this country, and even Joe Biden, who has admittedly said that, you know, there were some things that he’s made mistakes on.

And so, as a Christian, as a pastor, I believe that the first step of becoming whole again is repentance, acknowledging and introspectively looking at what you’ve done and being able to step forward. So that we don’t have, like we just saw in Philadelphia, the Walter Wallace, Jr, situations and we don’t have George Floyd’s and Breonna Taylor’s. And we can actually move towards healing this nation.

I believe that though both– and they need to repent and this country needs to repent for the sins against those Black bodies and other bodies in this country who have not been able to be healed and brought forward to a fullness of the Americanness that we all are striving towards.

I deeply believe that right now, we are seeing the racial flames stoked again by our president. And I think that has added to the reasons why people are turning out. Some 85 million people have already voted. And they’ve stepped up, firm, knowing that they’ve made a decision. And we’re praying that we can step closer towards unity when we need it most.

JEN ROGERS: When you talk about those voter turnout numbers, and earlier, we had Ben Jealous talking about registering voters, and especially Black men, to get to the polls, and to hear you talking about the president turning people out right now with the flames being stoked, maybe that can happen. What happens in 2021? What happens in 2022? Do you think these voters will continue to come back? Or is this just a vote against President Trump?

WILLIE BODRICK, II: Well, we know that there’s been an ebb and a flow. I mean, I think we can’t have this conversation seriously without having a conversation around voter suppression writ large. Since the 15th Amendment in this country was granted to Black people the right to vote, what we know very critically is that there’s been a constant attack on Black voting efforts historically.

We also know that our foremothers and forefathers fought fervently to ensure that the Voting Rights Act was there in 1965 and it was passed. But even now that is under attack. And so I think that voters will turn out. People will see their real lived experiences.

But we also must acknowledge that there are tactics that are continually affecting the voter turnout in many communities, particularly in communities of color. We have to deal with not only just the international interference that we’re seeing in our elections, but we’re also talking about misinformation. We’re talking about gerrymandered districts. We’re talking about automatic voting purges. And we’re talking about voter ID requirements and barriers for those brothers and sisters that are returning citizens from incarceration.

So there are a lot of issues that we must address. I don’t think that this is just a flash in the pan. I really do believe that voters are tuned in. And this pandemic has done something very interesting. It has really focused us to really look at what really matters. Who are the people who are being most affected? This really lifted the veil off of those pre-existing systemic conditions that we know that we have already been there pre-COVID for many Black and brown communities.

And so I think 2020 is just a sign that we are going to see a more engaged voter base and a more engaged populace. And we’re going to continue to keep doing that work in churches and our communal organizations, advocating for the right to vote for each and every person.

SIBILE MARCELLUS: Well, America is definitely watching and can’t wait for Election Day and see who wins. Reverend Willie Bodrick of 12th Baptist Church in Massachusetts, thanks so much.

WILLIE BODRICK, II: Thank you very much for having me.

#Bodrick #destiny #determine #election #nation #Reverend #Willie

0 notes

spynotebook · 7 years

Link

The idealist in me has long wanted to believe that labels don’t matter, but if you address me in the wrong way too many times? It becomes clear to me that labels are important. Labels help define us and our role in the world. This helps us connect to others—it gives us a sense of purpose and belonging. But labels aren’t static. How we identify changes over time. Children become adults; students become teachers; daughters become mothers; etc. But does that change who we are?

In many ways, we are ever evolving. While we only have a single lifetime, the events of our lives sometimes make portions seem wholly separate. That often leaves us feeling like the Doctor from Doctor Who. Where we would say something seemed like it happened a lifetime ago, that may be true for the Doctor. The Doctor’s longevity and ability to regenerate has given them the chance to live many lifetimes. Each time, they are a different person and live a different life than the one before, carrying with them all the memories and many of the attributes of their previous incarnations.

“But wait…” you must be thinking, “they? Isn’t the Doctor a ‘he?’”

On Sunday, July 16th, 2017, the BBC announced that the Doctor’s next regeneration will be female. Jodie Whittaker, best known for her role as Beth Latimer in Broadchurch, will take up the role and regenerate into the Doctor when Peter Capaldi departs the show in the upcoming Christmas special, Twice Upon a Time. This will be the first time in the show’s 54-year history that the Doctor will be a woman.

We’ve seen the Doctor speak as a woman in the past. In “New Earth,” the first episode of series two, the Lady Cassandra jumped into the Doctor’s body. However, that didn’t make her the Doctor. She was simply a woman trapped in a man’s body. So what does it mean now that the Doctor will be played by a woman? Does this change her?

In today’s society, we recognize that the labels that have been assigned to us are not always correct. Thankfully, increasing awareness of this has more and more people asking each other how to they prefer to be addressed and how they identify. Now as we move from a male to a female Doctor, we must consider the implications of what it means to be a Time Lord. Or a Time Lady. Is there a difference? Which is correct?

I was recently a guest on BBC’s Newshour, discussing the Doctor being played by a woman. At the end of the segment, I was asked if the Doctor, as played by Jodie Whittaker, will be a Time Lord or a Time Lady. I didn’t think twice—I said that Time Lord is a race, and thus she would still be a Time Lord.

Well, in reviewing references from both the Classic Who and New Who, the results are mixed. Time Lord and Time Lady have both been used to refer to women. Romana was called a Time Lady in “City of Death” from the 17th season of the classic series, and Missy specially requests to be referred to as a Time Lady in Dark Water in the 8th season of the new series. However, the Academy on Gallifrey is referred to as the Time Lord Academy in several instances, and Rassilon addresses the Senate (men and women) as “Time Lords of Gallifrey” in The Day of the Doctor in New Who. There does not appear to be a clear answer.

We’ve already run into a language issue. Is Time Lord a race? A species? A title in a caste system? In my incorrect estimation, I had previously considered being a Time Lord vs. being a Gallifreyan like whether you would call yourself a human or a Terran. Humans are a Terran humanoid species. However, not all Gallifreyans become Time Lords. Gallifreyans who become Time Lords are from ruling houses called The Chapters of Gallifrey. This sort of caste system determines who rules by bloodline, but being a Time Lord is more than who you’re related to.

Ten seems to reference this in “The Doctor’s Doctor” in series four. In this episode, the Doctor is cloned. The clone, Jenny, is a young woman, and Donna asks, “Does that mean she’s a … what do you call a female Time Lord?” Jenny asks what a Time Lord is and if she is one. The Doctor responds, “You’re an echo, that’s all. A Time Lord is so much more. A sum of knowledge, a code, shared history, shared suffering.” While the Doctor was likely speaking out over his hurt about the past, his point is made. There is a sum of knowledge gained through the Academy.

How important is the Academy? Children were taken from their families at the age of eight to look into the Untempered Schism of Time, according to the Doctor in “The Sound of Drums.” This did not always end well. Neither does it seem to be a strict necessity, as humans were admitted to the academy for some time. It is unclear if they would ever finish, though. According to the comics, individuals spent centuries at the Academy. Does this mean looking into the Untempered Schism makes this possible? Does it change your genes?

We know there is a genetic component. In Doctor Who Confidential, it’s stated that Jenny, who was cloned from the Doctor, is “another member of that race, or something closely akin to it.” We also look to River Song. In series six, River’s genetics is explained in “A Good Man Goes to War.” Being conceived in the time vortex gifted River with Time Lord DNA in addition to her human DNA. There are few that would not consider River a female Time Lord, given her ability to regenerate.

So as a species or a race, being a Time Lord is like being a Trill from Star Trek. The Trill are a joined species–a host and a symbiont. While Trill have the potential to join with a symbiont, not all do, and you must take part in extensive training. Much like the Trill and joining, it is only after going to the academy that one becomes a Time Lord. There are both genetic and learned components of each group.

Each Doctor is a new person, carrying on bits of their former selves much like the symbiont carrying the memories of the past to the new Trill they join with. We cannot simply say that the way they thought of and referred themselves previously is the same way they will in the future. Even in people, we understand that we grow and change. Our labels change.

Jodie Whittaker comes to the role of the Doctor at a disadvantage not applicable previously. She is fighting against the notion that the Doctor is necessarily a man. Even actors who previously played the Doctor have stated they are unsure of a woman playing the role. “If I feel any doubts, it’s the loss of a role model for boys, who I think Doctor Who is vitally important for. So, I feel a bit sad about that, but I understand the argument that you need to open it up,” Peter Davison, the fifth Doctor, told The Guardian.

Not everyone agrees. Colin Baker, otherwise known as the sixth Doctor, stated on Twitter, “Change my dears and not a moment too soon–she IS the Doctor, whether you like it or not!” And as Merriam Webster so kindly reminded us, the word ‘doctor’ has no gender in English. There is nothing inherent in the character or even in the name the Doctor chose for themself. That’s a big part of where the Doctor differs from the Missy/the Master. Missy has been a female and a male. Missy changed her name and requested that she be referred to as a Time Lady.

Frankly, the phrase Time Lady makes my skin crawl. Perhaps it’s the association with Missy that does it, or maybe it’s the history Doctor Who has with female characters. It comes across being demeaning and diminutive, as if the Doctor will be subservient to men. The character should in no way be diminished or appear subservient because they will now be a woman.

I informally polled my friends through Facebook and Twitter; it seems I’m not alone in preferring Time Lord continue to be used (we ran about 80/20, Time Lord to Time Lady). While more gender-neutral options where suggested, including Time Being and Time Folk, most preferred to use Time Lord as a gender-neutral option. Some even argued that “lord” is a gender-neutral word. Rather than using the definition that a lord is “a man of rank or high position–a feudal tenant whose right or title comes directly from the king,” they argued that a lord is “one who has power and authority over others, and is a ruler by hereditary right or preeminence to whom service and obedience are due.”

There is a difference in usage in how we use lord and lady in regular conversation. While you think of a lord as someone powerful, a lady can merely be the polite way to refer to any woman. Lady can also bring up less savory feelings. It can be used to indicate a particular code of conduct—acting ladylike, which again brings up the idea of being subservient to men. It also brings up thoughts Jerry Lewis shouting, “Hey lady,” or any trilby-wearing bro calling you, “milady,” their voice dripping with condescension.

In the end, how we refer to the Doctor should be the Doctor’s choice. There is power in claiming an identity. There is power in her name. There is power in her history as a Time Lord. Let’s hope the writers recognize that and craft a scene where the Doctor is definitive in embracing her identity and remembering that she is who she has always been—a Time Lord.

(image: BBC)

Holly Christine is a geek girl with a sick love of Wonder Woman, Harry Potter, and all things sci-fi. She helps head up @NerdVice and @CirclePlus_ where you can listen to her on the podcast, “Late Night with Bisexuals.” Listen to her gush about her nerdy pursuits, adventure games, and everything cute on Twitter @gookygox.

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

#IFTTT #Feedly

0 notes