#restaurant revitalization fund eligibility | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

duganholmgaard96 · 11 months

Text

12 Commonly Requested Questions On The Worker Retention Credit

The tax credit is the same as 70% of qualified salaries given to workers by certified employers within the fiscal 12 months 2021, with a maximum return of $7,000 per worker each quarter. Amount of the ERC –The ERC is 70% of eligible wages and healthcare costs as much as $10,000 per worker for the related calendar quarter. No ERC Revenue Reduction am I still qualified means that the ERC resets every quarter; thus, the maximum credit per employee is $14,000 for the primary two quarters of 2021. Most useful is that the election could be made for either quarter and it doesn't need to be made for both quarters. This allows a taxpayer that meets the check for one quarter to qualify for two quarters of the 2021 ERC.

Wages reported as payroll costs for PPP mortgage forgiveness or certain different tax credits cannot be claimed for the ERC in any tax interval.

These credit reward qualified corporations for qualifying wage funds, encouraging them to maintain their workers in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

If you wish to claim ERC or need details about this tax credit score, hold reading.

If you receive a restaurant revitalization fund grant or a shuttered venues operator grant, the wages you pay with the grant funds can’t be used to assert the ERC.

Employers with greater than 500 workers are not capable of receive an advanceable ERTC. Companies trying to declare the ERTC must report their total certified wages, as properly as the associated medical insurance costs, on their quarterly tax returns . This refundable credit score shall be taken towards the employer’s share of Social Security tax. If you proceed to provide health care benefits to workers who aren’t working, those advantages may be certified wages.

Help On The Means To Get Employee Retention Tax Credit (erc / Ertc): Obtain Up To $26,000 Per Worker For Your Business

In Example 2, the business suffered more than 50% income decline in the second quarter, so it's eligible for the ERC in the second quarter. However, because the third quarter revenues declined by solely 19%, the business won't be able to assert the ERC for the fourth quarter. This is although the fourth quarter revenues were the same because the third quarter. For a enterprise that began in 2019, the quarter the enterprise started should be the bottom of determining the quarterly decline, until the enterprise reaches a yr of operations. For example, a new business that began within the second quarter of 2019 would use that quarter as the base to discover out income decline for either first quarter 2020 or second quarter 2020.

The self-employment earnings of self-employed individuals are not thought of qualified wages. Employers would compare their 2021 quarterly income to the identical quarter for 2019. The Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of provided numerous changes to the Employee Retention Tax Credit . Most of those adjustments are only relevant beginning Jan. 1, 2021 and solely applied to the first two quarters of 2021. Congress has since extended the ERTC from June 30, 2021 to Dec. 31, 2021. If your organization was not in business in 2019, you would use a corresponding quarter in 2020 to point out you had a revenue discount between 2020 and 2021 and qualify for the ERTC.

The Method To Calculate Worker Retention Credit Score 2021?

Eligible employers should declare the ERC for prior quarters by submitting an applicable adjusted employment tax return within the deadline set forth within the corresponding type directions. The definition of ERTC certified wages and qualified health expenses is noticeably different than the definition used in the PPP law and laws. Under PPP adjustments made as part of the CAA, an employer can assist the PPP mortgage using any period of time within the PPP interval (which is April 1 – December 31, 2020), not simply the eight weeks or 24 weeks offered underneath prior guidance.

youtube

#No ERC Revenue Reduction am I still qualified #ERTC Assist #ERC Revenue Reduction #erc revenue reduction test #erc credit 2021 revenue reduction #erc tax credit revenue reduction #2020 erc revenue reduction

2 notes · View notes

content23423 · 8 months

Text

Personal tradelines in USA , CANADA | Restaurants loan In USA, CANADA

When seeking restaurant loans, reputable lenders include Funding Circle and BlueVine in the USA, and RBC Royal Bank and BMO Bank of Montreal in Canada. Evaluate interest rates, repayment terms, and eligibility requirements to find the best fit for your personal tradelines or restaurant loan needs. Best Personal tradelines in USA , CANADA | Restaurants loan In USA, CANADA.In the USA and Canada, trusted sources for personal tradelines include companies like Tradeline Supply Company and Superior Tradelines. Enhance your credit profile with personalized tradelines in the USA and Canada, courtesy of [Wambui]. Our carefully selected tradelines can boost your credit score by adding positive payment history to your report. Whether you're applying for loans, mortgages, or better interest rates, our tradeline solutions offer a tailored approach to improve your creditworthiness. Take control of your financial future by exploring our range of effective tradeline options. Elevate your credit score with [Wambui] today. Fuel your culinary dreams with specialized restaurant loans available in the USA and Canada. At [Wambui], we understand the unique needs of the restaurant industry. Our tailored financing solutions can help you open, expand, or revitalize your restaurant business. Benefit from competitive rates and expert guidance as you navigate the lending process. Secure the funds you need to create a thriving dining experience. Apply now to turn your restaurant vision into reality with [Wambui].

#Personal tradelines in USA #CANADA | Restaurants loan In USA #CANADA

0 notes

dearvicme · 1 year

Text

Senate Bill Would Give Payroll Tax Relief to Some Small Businesses

The Restaurant Revitalization Tax Credit Act has been reintroduced to provide payroll tax relief to eligible small businesses. Senate Bill Would Give Payroll Tax Relief to Some Small Businesses The new legislation creates a special tax credit that is available to businesses that had previously applied for the Small Business Administration’s Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF) program, but did…

View On WordPress

0 notes

hiterri · 2 years

Text

Ubreak iphix

#Ubreak iphix full

#Ubreak iphix registration

#Ubreak iphix code

In order to qualify for the PPP loan amount received, Ubreak Iphix LLC's 2019 payroll expenses are estimated to be at least $31,622. Please Note: Information on estimated payroll and compensation based on PPP rules is provided for informational purposes only.īased on the standard PPP eligibility formula, it may be possible to estimate the payroll expenses represented by a company on their PPP application (see details above). Latitude Longitude for uBreak iPhix LLC - Electronic Repair in Salinas, CA Lat: 36.658208 Lng: -121.659455, Driving directions for uBreak iPhix LLC.

#Ubreak iphix full

Additionally, because this standard calculation is based on the maximum loan eligibility, it will under-estimate payroll costs if the business did not apply for the full amount of loan to which it was entitled based on its 2019 payroll expenses and other variables described above.Because salaries for PPP eligibility purposes are capped at $100k, businesses with highly-compensated employees will yield an under-estimation of actual payroll costs.This estimation assumes that the PPP recipient applied for the full amount for which they were eligible, and no other variables affected the loan amount received. uBreakiFix in Athens is a popular phone repair shop with millions of. Situations may exist in which it may not be accurate to estimate a PPP recipient's payroll expenses based on the amount of PPP loan received. Best Mobile Phone Repair in Athens, TX 75751 - Speedy Tech Repair, iPhix - Cell. SES - Senior Executive Service Pay Calculatorįor Ubreak Iphix LLC, the calculation used to estimate payroll costs is shown below:.FWS - Federal Wage System Pay Calculator.Find other electronics repair shop in Salinas with. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Associationġ040 Riker st. Get website, phone, hours, directions for uBreak iPhix, East Alisal Street 526 Salinas, +1 8312042233.

#Ubreak iphix code

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)įirst Draw Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)Įxemption 4 of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person privileged or confidentialīusinesses in the same zip code Business Name The business type is Self-Employed Individuals. The business address is 1184 south main street, salinas, CA 93901-2204. Small Business Administration (SBA), Office of Capital Access. Ubreak Iphix LLC is a business received Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans from U.S.

NYS Tax Return Preparers & Facilitators.

Connecticut Child Care Programs and Youth Camps Links out alz.org alz.org optimizedistribution.c.

Richmond (Virginia) Property Assessment.

South Carolina Government Employ Salaries.

New York State Employee Salary Information.

San Francisco Registered Business Locations.

#Ubreak iphix registration

Orinda Business Registration Certificates.

Washington DC Certified Business Enterprises.

Seattle Business License Tax Certificates.

New Orleans Occupational Business Licenses.

Florida Business and Professional Licenses.

Delaware Professional and Occupational Licenses.

SBA Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF).

SBA Targeted EIDL Advance and Supplemental Targeted Advance.

SBA COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL).

#Ubreak iphix

1 note · View note

greatemployeeretentioncredit · 2 years

Text

What Is the Employee Retention Credit?

The Employee Retention Credit, or ERC, was created by Congress as a way to reward employers who have kept their employees through tough economic times. It is an incentive for employers to keep their employees and is worth up to 70 percent of their wages per quarter. In order to be eligible, employers must meet certain requirements.

In order to be eligible for the credit, employers must suspend more than a nominal amount of their business operations. These operations must account for at least 10 percent of total hours or gross receipts. Businesses started after March 2020 are eligible for this credit. However, if they have already changed the way they do business, it is still possible to claim the credit. Read more great facts, go here.

The Employee Retention Tax Credit was created by Congress in March 2020 and has been extended and expanded twice since then. It was initially set to end on January 1, 2022. However, the 2021 Infrastructure Bill retroactively accelerated the end date, which means that eligible employers can still claim the credit on their taxes for both 2020 and 2021. For more useful reference, learn here.

This tax credit is refundable and applies to all employers that meet the qualification requirements. Employers can claim up to 50% of qualified wages when the tax credits are applied retroactively. To qualify for the credit, employers must show that the reduction in employees had a significant impact on their business. In addition, the employee retention credit also reduces the employer's employment tax deposits.

Employers who incorrectly claimed the ERC may still claim it for qualified wages paid between March 13, 2020, and Sept. 30, 2021. To claim this credit, employers must file an amended Form 941-X. The maximum credit for a single employee per quarter is $10,000. Further, employers can claim up to 70% of paid wages and certain health insurance expenses in California through the end of 2021.

The Employee Retention Tax Credit is applicable to employers with 100 or fewer full-time employees. Qualified wages include health care expenses up to $10k per employee. However, this tax credit does not apply to wages paid to employees who take paid sick or family leave. For example, wages from a Shuttered Venue Operators Grant or Restaurant Revitalization Fund are not treated as qualified wages under the Employee Retention Tax Credit. Please view this site https://www.wikihow.com/Reduce-Employee-Turnover for further details.

The Employee Retention Tax Credit (ERC) was approved as part of the CARES Act to encourage employers to keep employees on the payroll rather than receiving unemployment compensation. The ERC is a refundable tax credit that can help employers keep their employees during a recession. It is available to businesses that hire and fire employees, but not to self-employed individuals and government employees. Businesses that qualify for the ERC should discuss this benefit with their tax advisor.

0 notes

total-food-service · 3 years

Text

Restaurant Revitalization Award Portal Launches

To begin the application process at the Restaurant Revitalization Award Portal, visit the official website. This portal will help you calculate your eligible award amount, monitor status, and interact with the SBA. Read below for more information and background of how it all came together. After a year of heavy lifting by a group of independent restaurateurs, the money committed to the Federal…

View On WordPress

0 notes

discovercathedralcity · 3 years

Text

Restaurants, Bars, Bakeries, Food Trucks, and Caterers Can Apply for New Federal Relief Funds

The American Rescue Plan Act established the Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF) to provide funding to help restaurants and other eligible businesses keep their doors open. This program will provide restaurants with funding equal to their pandemic-related revenue loss up to $10 million per business and no more than $5 million per physical location. Recipients are not required to repay the…

View On WordPress

#business #Coronavirus #covid-19

1 note · View note

issacisrael · 3 years

Text

The Problem with the SBA and the Government Grants

I just received the following message from the SBA:

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is announcing the closure of the Restaurant Revitalization Fund. Through the American Rescue Plan Act, the SBA launched the Restaurant Revitalization Fund to provide funding to help restaurants and other eligible businesses keep their doors open. SBA received over 370,000 applications from restaurant owners across the United States.

The program provided critical funding to over 105,000 restaurants representing $28.6 billion dollars. The program supported 3,777 small restaurants with gross receipts of less than $50,000 in 2019.

Due to overwhelming demand, the SBA was unable to fund all qualified applications with the original appropriation provided in the American Rescue Plan Act. Those applicants who have not received funding as of this email will have their applications held within the application platform to allow for processing in the order received if additional funds are provided by Congress.

The Restaurant Revitalization Fund application platform will remain open for the next two weeks to allow applicants to check their status, address payment corrections, or ask questions. The SBA will disable access to the platform on July 14, 2021.

_____________________

Of course, my restaurant was not included in this number of $28.6 billion dollars distributed. I bought and opened a Mexican restaurant in September of last year right in the middle of the pandemic. I thought I was doing the right thing to help out the owners, but the state of California did nothing to help me out, and neither did the federal government.

My issue with this message from the SBA is that it seems like this fund helped the restaurants who did not need the help. These are restaurants that have the savings and funding to continue through the Covid even without government help. As a matter of fact, they have so much funding that they were able to open up other restaurants because they received the funding. And I thought the funding was supposed to go to the supposed truly struggling restaurant owners.

Did California and New York restaurants get priority with this funding? I wish the government would make public the statistics of exactly which states and what kinds of restaurants the funds went to and how the funds were used.

As other restaurants are opening new restaurants with grant funding monies, I have been evicted from the property the restaurant has been on for the past 43 years.

To add insult to injury, I found out one of my cooks, who had been with the restaurant for 25 years, Rafael, contracted cancer and died on the same day that I received this notice from the SBA.

I don't know what greater argument I could have given for my restaurant to receive grant funding:

-- ethnic Mexican restaurant

-- community staple for 43 years

-- located in California

-- maximum 49 person capacity

-- bailed out former owners in the middle of Covid in September

My restaurant was the model restaurant for what the Restaurant Revitalization grant was created for. Yet I did not receive a penny. All the other grants were willing to give me money but only after I spent money to get their paperwork done. The very reason why I needed the grant is because I need the monies to pay for things - not to pay for paperwork for the grantor.

I do not believe the local and federal governments administered the funding properly. What should have been done is the following:

-- given priority to California and New York City restaurants

-- given priority to minority owned restaurants

-- given priority to restaurants with a capacity of 100 people or less

The owners who struggled the most with their restaurants did not receive the funding. These are the restaurants that do the accounting themselves, repair issues in the restaurant themselves, and have people in the 15% tax bracket working in the restaurant.

The government did not do a proper job to truly investigate how the funds were being used and who was using the funds. Their reasoning is if the restaurant was able to use an expensive accounting firm and payroll company to produce the books in exactly how they wanted to receive it, then they would fund the restaurant. Books aren't in order? Too bad.

How about the restaurants who were scraping by on to go orders just to pay the payroll? How about those restaurants whose paperwork for the grant funding was the last thing they were concerned about because they needed to figure out marketing and operations for the restaurant in the pandemic to make sure their employees were being paid? How about those restaurants?

It's really sad that the government discriminated against restaurants who really needed the money versus restaurants that had the money to meet their grant funding requirements because they could afford to pay for the documents that were needed. What a disservice to the truly struggling restaurant owners.

#sba #smallbusinessadministration #congress #SBAfailure

0 notes

saandrale · 3 years

Photo

Join us for a discussion with Sean Gray, Economic Development Specialist with the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). Sean will be sharing details on the restaurant revitalization fund. During this informational webinar we’ll discuss program details, eligibility and the application process.

0 notes

iowamedia · 3 years

Text

Last call for Restaurant Revitalization Fund applications

WASHINGTON – Eligible restaurant owners have until Monday, May 24 at 8 p.m. ET to submit applications to the Restaurant Revitalization Fund through the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). “If our nation’s food and beverage industry is going to fully recover, we must ensure as many of the hardest-hit businesses get the economic aid they need,” said SBA Administrator Isabella Casillas Guzman.…

View On WordPress

0 notes

orbemnews · 3 years

Link

Unemployment Pay May Again Require a Job Search. Is It Too Soon? A tenet of the American unemployment system has been that anyone collecting benefits, in good times and bad, must look for work. That quid pro quo changed early in the pandemic. Profound fears of contagion and the sudden need for millions of workers to become caregivers led states to lift the requirements for reasons both practical and compassionate. But as vaccinations increase and the economy revs back to life, more than half of all states have revived their work search requirements. Arkansas and Louisiana did so months ago in an effort to push workers off their swollen unemployment rolls. Others, like Vermont and Kentucky, have followed in the last few weeks. The rest may be on the way. President Biden on Monday ordered the Labor Department to “work with the remaining states, as health and safety conditions allow,” to put such requirements in place as the pandemic abates. Employers may welcome the moves as potentially enlarging the pool of job seekers. But for many workers, the search obligation is a premature declaration that the world has returned to normal even as legitimate concerns persist about contracting the virus and about child care constraints. “The work search thing is just a mess,” said Tyler Evans, 34, who lost his job of nearly four years at a restaurant in downtown Nashville early in the pandemic. Mr. Evans’s doctor has not cleared him for work, warning him that he faced extra risk from the coronavirus because he has an autoimmune disease. According to Tennessee, however, Mr. Evans must complete three job search activities a week to remain eligible for unemployment benefits. When he explained his situation to people at the State Labor Department, they suggested that he just say he had looked for work, because the state’s system had no way to account for health cases like his. Instead, Mr. Evans has diligently applied to jobs every week — even though he wouldn’t be able to accept any of them. “I would say one out of four times, someone would give me a call back,” he said. “And I would have to say, ‘Oh, I actually can’t work for you for health reasons, but the Department of Labor asked that I do this anyway.’” Research suggests that work search requirements of some form in normal economic times can compel workers to find their next job and reduce their time on unemployment. But the pandemic has added a new layer to a debate over how to balance relief with the presumption that joblessness is only transitory. Most states cut off unemployment benefits after 26 weeks. Business groups say bringing back work search requirements will help juice the labor market and dissuade workers from waiting to return to their old employers or holding out for remote or better-paying jobs. Opponents contend that the mandate keeps undue numbers of Americans from continuing to receive needed benefits because it can be hard to meet the sometimes arduous requirements, including documenting the search efforts. And they say workers may be forced to apply for and accept lower-paying or less-satisfying jobs at a time when the pandemic has caused some to reassess the way they think about their work, their family needs and their prospects. “I think the work search requirement is necessary as an economist,” said Marta Lachowska, an economist at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in Kalamazoo, Mich., who has studied the effects of work search requirements on employment. But she added, “Perhaps given the big disruption we have observed to the labor market, people should be given some slack.” In Washington, the issue has become part of a larger clash over jobless benefits that intensified after the disappointing April jobs report, with Republicans asserting that Mr. Biden’s policies are deterring people from looking for work and holding back the economic recovery. A rising number of Republican governors have taken matters into their own hands, moving to end a weekly $300 unemployment supplement and other federally funded emergency assistance that otherwise isn’t due to expire until September. Mr. Biden has rebuffed the criticism of his economic recovery plan. But his embrace of work search requirements — more than a year after the federal government directed states to waive them — has made the practice a pillar in the effort to revitalize the economy. Tim Goodrich, the executive director for state government relations at the National Federation of Independent Business, said his members had complained that they were having trouble filling open positions — a challenge that restoring work search requirements may help alleviate. “They are seeing a lack of applicants, so a job search is certainly helpful,” Mr. Goodrich said. Job openings rose in March to 8.1 million, the Labor Department reported on Tuesday, yet there are more than eight million fewer people working than before the pandemic. Economists ascribe some of the incongruity to a temporary mismatch between the jobs on offer and the skills or background of those looking for work. They say that in a recovering labor market like the current one, there may not be enough suitable jobs for people seeking re-employment, which can frustrate workers and drive them to apply to positions haphazardly. That has been the case for Rie Wilson, 45, who worked in venue sales for a nonprofit in New York City before she lost her job last summer. To fulfill New York’s work search requirement, which generally makes unemployment applicants complete at least three job search activities each week, Ms. Wilson has had to apply for positions she would not typically consider, like administrative assistant jobs, she said. The prospect of accepting such a job makes her anxious. “There is always a thought in my mind that, ‘Well, what if I do get pulled in this direction just because I’m being forced to apply for these jobs? What does that look like for my career?’” she said. The process has been time-consuming, she said, “and it’s also a mental wear and tear because you’re literally pulled from all angles in a very stressful situation.” Alexa Tapia, the unemployment insurance campaign coordinator at the National Employment Law Project, a worker advocacy group, said work search requirements “harm more than they help,” especially during the pandemic. In particular, she said, such requirements perpetuate systemic racism by trapping people of color, especially women, in underpaid work with fewer benefits. And she noted that people of color were more likely to be denied benefits on the basis of such requirements. With state unemployment offices already overtaxed, she added, work search requirements are “just another barrier being put to claimants, and it can be a very demoralizing barrier.” In states that have reinstated work search requirements, worker advocates say an especially frustrating obstacle has been a lack of guidance. Sue Berkowitz, the director of the South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center, which works with low-income South Carolinians, said unemployed workers in the state largely wanted to go back to work. But the information on the state’s website about work search requirements is so confusing, she said, that she worries workers won’t understand it. Before the state reimposed the requirements last month, Ms. Berkowitz sent a marked-up copy of the proposed language to the chief of staff at the South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce urging clarifications and changes. One of her biggest concerns was that the language as it stood was at a 12th-grade reading level, while the typical reading level of adult Americans is much lower. She did not hear back. “It was crickets,” she said. More broadly, employees in South Carolina, where the minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, can be reluctant to take a job that pays less than the one they had before the pandemic, Ms. Berkowitz said. “It’s not that they are below taking a job that makes a lot less, but their financial needs are high enough that they need to continue to make a certain salary,” she said. Although work search requirements have become a political issue, their restoration does not fall solely along partisan lines. Florida, for instance, where the Republican governor has repeatedly flouted virus restrictions, had kept the work search waiver in place before announcing recently that it would reinstate the requirement at the end of the month. But many other states, particularly Republican ones, have rushed to bring their work search requirements back. That is what Crista San Martin found when they left their job out of health concerns at a dog boarding facility in Cypress, Texas, which reinstated its work search requirement in November. Mx. San Martin, 27, who uses the pronouns they and them, said there were very few job openings near them in the pet care industry, making finding a position onerous. “That made it really difficult for me to log any work searches, because there simply weren’t enough jobs that I would actually want to take for my career,” they said. The first job they applied to was at a Panera, “which is not in my field of interest at all.” Above all, applying to arbitrary jobs felt risky, they said, because there was no way to assess potential employers’ Covid-19 safety protocols. Mx. San Martin has since returned to their old job. “It’s pretty unfair,” they said. “Going out and just casting a wide net and seeing whether a random business will take you is not safe.” Source link Orbem News #Job #pay #require #Search #Unemployment

0 notes

dipulb3 · 3 years

Text

Biden defends economic proposals as GOP calls for paring back unemployment benefits

New Post has been published on https://appradab.com/biden-defends-economic-proposals-as-gop-calls-for-paring-back-unemployment-benefits/

Biden defends economic proposals as GOP calls for paring back unemployment benefits

Though the economy created a scant 266,000 jobs in April, Biden stressed that more than 1.5 million jobs have been added since he took office — the most in the first 100 days of any of his predecessors.

“So let’s be clear, our economic plan is working,” he said, speaking from the White House. “I never said, and no serious analyst ever suggested, that climbing out of the deep, deep hole our economy was in would be simple, easy, immediate or perfectly steady.”

At the same time, Biden acknowledged the concerns of some Republican officials and business owners, affirming that laid-off Americans must return to work if they are offered positions.

The firm statement diverged in tone from Biden’s earlier directive that jobless Americans can keep collecting unemployment benefits even if they turn down work for pandemic safety concerns. The Department of Labor issued new guidance to that effect in late February, saying that workers should not have to choose between accepting a position in an unsafe place and risking the health of themselves or their loved ones.

By contrast, after months of increased Covid-19 vaccinations and ample supply of the three available vaccines, the Biden administration on Monday said it was directing the Department of Labor to clarify that workers cannot turn turn down a job due to a general concern about Covid-19 and continue to receive benefits. Also, Labor Secretary Marty Walsh will work with states to reinstate work search requirements for unemployment benefits’ recipients, if health and safety conditions allow. Some 29 states have already done so after suspending them last year amid the coronavirus outbreak.

The fight over unemployment benefits

The enhanced pandemic unemployment benefits have become a lightning rod as the nation seeks to move beyond the coronavirus outbreak.

As part of their $1.9 trillion relief package, the Democrats extended into early September the trio of federal measures that Congress first enacted in March 2020 in its unprecedented expansion of the nation’s unemployment benefits system. These include: providing a weekly federal boost now worth $300, on top of state benefits; enabling freelancers, independent contractors and certain people affected by the virus to receive unemployment compensation and extending payments for those who’ve exhausted their state benefits.

Republicans and business owners point to labor shortages in many states and industries as proof that the supplemental benefits are keeping people on the sidelines.

The governors of Montana, South Carolina and Arkansas last week announced they would end the pandemic programs in their states in late June. And the US Chamber of Commerce called for the termination of the $300 supplemental payment the jobless are currently receiving.

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, said Monday that the state will cease participating in the pandemic programs starting June 19. The state’s unemployment rate is 3.8%, among the lowest in the nation.

“As Alabama’s economy continues its recovery, we are hearing from more and more business owners and employers that it is increasingly difficult to find workers to fill available jobs, even though job openings are available,” Ivey said. “Among other factors, increased unemployment assistance, which was meant to be a short-term relief program during emergency related shutdowns, is not contributing to a labor shortage that is compromising the continuation of our economic recovery.”

More federal assistance is on its way

Also key to getting people back to work is removing the barriers that are keeping them home, including sending aid to state and local governments, providing access to child care, reopening schools and broadening vaccination efforts, Biden said.

The President and White House outlined Monday some steps the administration is taking to assist in these areas. Biden noted that only 18% of working-age adults were fully vaccinated when the jobs report survey was taken in mid-April. Today, the figure is 34%.

Also, the Treasury Department launched the $350 billion Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, which was created by the $1.9 trillion rescue package in March.

States, counties, metropolitan cities, tribes and territories can begin applying for their share, which could start being disbursed within days, a senior administration official told reporters Monday.

The money can be used to cover revenue shortfalls and increased expenses caused by the pandemic, including for spending on Covid-19 mitigation efforts, public health and mental health and substance abuse. The funds can also provide struggling households with food and housing assistance and help small businesses and other industries.

Noting that state and local governments have shed 1.3 million jobs since the start of the pandemic, officials said the funds will allow teachers, bus drivers, cafeteria staff, public safety and frontline personnel and essential workers, among others, to be rehired. Governments can also provide premium pay to essential workers.

In addition, the money can be spent on longer-term improvements to communities, including investments in clean drinking water, wastewater and stormwater systems and in broadband expansion.

One controversial restriction that Congress included in the provision is a ban on state and local governments using the funds directly or indirectly for tax cuts. More than a dozen Republican-led states have sued the administration over this measure, arguing that it is unconstitutional and exceeds lawmakers’ authority.

States will have to demonstrate how they have spent their allotments on eligible uses, another senior administration official said. If they want to cut taxes, they can, but they must demonstrate that the reductions were not supported by the federal funding.

“A state would simply have to show, ‘Here’s where the money went. We used it. We were not gaming in any way to indirectly free up other money for the tax relief’,” the official said. “If they meet that test, then of course they have their sovereign right as states to do whatever would like, including tax reductions.”

Addressing child care needs

To speed the distribution of $39 billion in federal support for child care providers, the Department of Health and Human Services on Monday will release guidance to states, tribes and territories so that they can immediately begin providing the funding to child care providers, the White House said.

The guidance will encourage states to make it easy for providers to claim it. The guidance will also encourage states to allow the funds to be used broadly to meet the needs of each child care provider to allow them to reopen or stay open.

Providers can use the funds to pay the rent, mortgage, insurance, utility bills, payroll and debts incurred because of the coronavirus pandemic. The money can also be used to buy personal protective equipment and implement safety measures, such as improving ventilation. States also can provide direct subsidies to families to help cover child care costs.

Also, the President announced that the administration is sending the first grants under the Restaurant Revitalization Fund to 16,000 restaurants hit hard by the pandemic. The program provides aid to struggling restaurants, bars, food trucks and other food and drink establishments and will help these businesses hire back workers. In the first two days of the program 186,200 restaurants, bars, and other eligible businesses applied for relief.

Meanwhile, the Treasury Department this week will lay out clear steps on how businesses can determine their eligibility and claim the expanded Employee Retention Credit that was included in the American Rescue Plan. This year, the credit offers eligible employers with 500 or fewer employees a tax credit of 70% of the first $10,000 in wages per employee per quarter. More than 30,000 small businesses have claimed more than $1 billion in credits this year, according to the White House, and the administration is working to increase participation in the program.

This story and its headline have been updated with additional developments on Monday.

0 notes