Hey. I want to tell you that Gaud is a racist, pedo and lesbophobe among other horrible things. I have a link of a Google Doc compiling everything if you'd like to read it.
Hey yourself!
From what I have seen of Gaud, every time they have fucked up, and fucking up is in human nature and not avoidable, they have been willing to change and respond to feedback - when people explained to them how bad the cult jokes were, they stopped, asked their followers to stop as well and apologized for the pain they caused several times.
Notice I did not say "You are wrong" - I am not infallible, and may have missed things.
I am saying "The concerns you are expressing run counter to my experience with this person."
In general, if you have grievances with them, I suggest taking it up with them, but confronting people you are wary of can be very scary, so I shall try my best to address your concerns:
The only trouble I ever saw them in with the lesbian community was over a gentle useless lesbian meme that was A meant affectionately in a very obvious manner and B they have apologized for.
Since they have zero patience for child abusers of any kind, and are an abuse survivor themselves, I find it very hard to believe they would sexually abuse children or endorse others doing so.
I am white, and I am still working on unlearning the racism society imparted on me, and am therefore in no way qualified to comment on their racism or lack thereof, and will defer to tumblrs’ PoC community in this issue - in fact I’ll do some research of my own on that, shortly.
Guessing from your bio, you are still rather young, and nuance does not come easy to the young - hell, it doesn’t always come easy to the elders, either, or anyone in between, especially for those of us on the spectrum who prefer clear rules and lines.
You trusted my judgement enough to reach out to me with your concerns, and I appreciate that.
Trust my judgement a bit further, okay?
You say you have evidence, and from the way you worded I presume you were not the one who compiled it. Have you read it critically?
Not in the sense of "finding fault", but in the sense of processing it in detail, the way you would a source for say, an English essay in school.
Who wrote it? What bias may they have had? Were they angry, sad, happy, vindictive when they wrote it? Are they trustworthy?
What was their intention in writing and sharing it? Are they attempting to present information to let you make up your own mind, or are they trying to change your mind?
Are they trying to present facts, or to elicit an emotional reaction from you and then capitalise on it?
Are they calling on you to protect yourself, or to go spread the word, or harass the person they are calling out?
Are things presented in context, or out of context? Is a personal vent treated as a PSA? Is a sleep-deprived joke made in poor taste presented as textual opinion? Was it something rude they said in the heat of the moment they've regretted, apologized for, and deleted since instead claimed to be current?
Are the posts in question both properly dated, and verifiable?
It is very easy to fake tumblr post screenshots (or, for that matter screenshots of tweets, facebook posts, or text messages) with even a limited grasp of HTML.
[image description: a screenshot of the ask from lleavethecity, with the text changed to say "I really like Jasper"]
Look at this screenshot where I edited your ask. You know that is not what you wrote to me, yet it took me less than a minute to make it look like you had. I could have changed this to something much more sinister, had I wanted. With a bit of extra effort, I could have taken a screenshot of the entire browser window, my entire desktop, or even lead someone to look at it on a screen-sharing service like teamviewer, and it still would have looked like that is what you have written me.
More insidiously, I could easily change smaller things as well - take a post that someone made years ago, and change the date to make it look recent instead - that's just one of the many examples I could come up with.
Technology is only ever as good or bad as the people who are using it.
Who shared it with you, and what was their intention?
Do you trust their judgement on all things implicitly, or do they have their own biases to contend with?
Are you familiar enough with common cognitive fallacies like strawman arguments, moving the goalposts, or ad hominem-attacks to spot them when they are employed?
You need to do your research, and apply critical thinking to what you learn, to come to your own conclusions - one way or another.
18 notes
·
View notes