#2may22

[littlemixnet]

Cardiff - 02/05

#little mix #confetti tour: cardiff 1 #2may22

[dailysebastiannews]

Sebastian via instagram story 2/5/22

#sebastian stan #photo #instagram story #2may22

[masterofd1saster]

CJ court watch 2may22

SCt decided Shurtleff v. Boston, 596 U. S. __ (2022) 9-0 with a few concurrences. Boston often lets people raise a flag of their choice on a pole outside city hall. Shurtleff wanted to hoist a generic Christian flag. The city refused suggesting it would violate the Establishment Clause.

*** All told, while the historical practice of flag flying at government buildings favors Boston, the city’s lack of meaningful involvement in the selection of flags or the crafting of their messages leads us to classify the flag raisings as private, not government, speech—though nothing prevents Boston from changing its policies going forward. III Last, we consider whether Boston’s refusal to allow Shurtleff and Camp Constitution to raise their flag amounted to impermissible viewpoint discrimination.

Boston acknowledges that it denied Shurtleff ’s request because it believed flying a religious flag at City Hall could violate the Establishment Clause. And it admits this concern proceeded from the premise that raising the flag would express government speech. See Brief in Opposition 23 explaining that “viewpoint neutrality” was “incompatible” with Boston’s view of its program). But we have rejected that premise in the preceding pages. We must therefore consider Boston’s actions in light of our holding. When a government does not speak for itself, it may not exclude speech based on “religious viewpoint”; doing so “constitutes impermissible viewpoint discrimination.” Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U. S. 98, 112 (2001). Applying that rule, we have held, for example, that a public university may not bar student-activity funds from reimbursing only religious groups. See Rosenberger, 515 U. S., at 830–834. Here, Boston concedes that it denied Shurtleff ’s request solely because the Christian flag he asked to raise “promot[ed] a specific religion.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 155a (quoting Rooney deposition). Under our precedents, and in view of our government-speech holding here, that refusal discriminated based on religious viewpoint and violated the Free Speech Clause.

For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that Boston’s flagraising program does not express government speech. As a result, the city’s refusal to let Shurtleff and Camp Constitution fly their flag based on its religious viewpoint violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. We reverse the First Circuit’s contrary judgment and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

[benzodiacpina]

Es el vivo ejemplo de que por conductas egoístas y desinterés se puede terminar de destruir una relación y se puede terminar de destruir el corazón de la otra persona, me alejo, me hizo sentir una basura, cuando antes me hacía sentir especial, no me quiso escuchar, no me quiso entender, me dejó sola cuando le dije que no quería jugar a esto, me arruinó la vida y me tuve que levantar arrastrandome, es una traición y duele, todos los días duele y mucho.

2may22

[littlemixnet]

Leigh-Anne during ‘Love Me or Leave Me’ tonight in Cardiff - 02/05

#leigh anne pinnock #video #confetti tour: cardiff 1 #2may22

[littlemixnet]

Cardiff - 02/05

#little mix #confetti tour: cardiff 1 #2may22

[littlemixnet]

Cardiff - 02/05

#little mix #confetti tour: cardiff 1 #2may22

[littlemixnet]

Perrie during the chair dance break tonight in Cardiff - 02/05

#perrie edwards #confetti tour: cardiff 1 #video #2may22

[littlemixnet]

Jade during ‘Love Me or Leave Me’ tonight in Cardiff - 02/05

#jade thirlwall #confetti tour: cardiff 1 #video #2may22