#Victor Castro-Huerta

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that Oklahoma has the authority to prosecute non-Native people who commit crimes against a Native person on tribal lands.

The Justices, in a 5-4 decision, said that both the state and federal government have jurisdiction to prosecute these crimes. The case, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, had been viewed as a pivotal one that cuts right into the heart of the fight over tribal sovereignty. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion.

Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by the three liberal Justice in his dissent, wrote that when the Cherokee were exiled to Oklahoma, they were promised that they would be free from state interference. “Where this Court once stood firm, today it wilts,” Gorsuch wrote. “Where our predecessors refused to participate in one State’s unlawful power grab at the expense of the Cherokee, today’s Court accedes to another’s.”

In 2015, Oklahoma state prosecutors charged Victor Castro-Huerta for the malnourishment and neglect of his five-year-old disabled stepdaughter. He was eventually sentenced to 35 years in prison. Castro-Huerta is not Native, but the victim, his stepdaughter, is a citizen of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, and the abuse took place on the Cherokee Reservation. Castro-Huerta challenged the decision by arguing that under the 2020 Supreme Court ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma, he can only be federally prosecuted. McGirt held that nearly half of Oklahoma is tribal land, and as such, under the Major Crimes Act, Oklahoma cannot prosecute crimes by Native citizens on tribal lands without federal approval.

In this case, Oklahoma argued that McGirt does not apply because the defendant was Native. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals had previously ruled that the state does not have the right to prosecute non-Native people for crimes with a Native victim on tribal land, but the Supreme Court disagreed.

This week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, a case that is seeking to limit the scope of a decision the Court made less than two years ago. In July 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma that Congress never annulled the Muscogee Nation reservation. After the McGirt ruling, an additional five reservations in the state were affirmed by lower courts—meaning that more than 40 percent of Oklahoma is now legally Indian Country.

Oklahoma argues that the scope of McGirt should be reviewed because the decision caused “sweeping turmoil” and “pitched Oklahoma’s criminal-justice system into a state of emergency.” The case centers on Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta, a non-Native man who was sentenced to 35 years in prison for neglecting his Native American stepchild while living on the Cherokee Nation reservation. His conviction was overturned by Oklahoma’s highest criminal-appeals court after he argued that the state lacked jurisdiction over his case. (He has already pleaded guilty to federal charges.) Oklahoma then appealed the case to the Supreme Court, reasoning that the state should retain jurisdiction over Castro-Huerta and all other non-Native defendants in crimes with Native victims.

To prove that McGirt wreaked havoc in Oklahoma, the state is claiming that it has lost jurisdiction over 18,000 prosecutions a year, many of which are now “going un-investigated and unprosecuted, endangering public safety.”

The problem is that this number seems to have come out of nowhere; Oklahoma doesn’t provide any source for it. Over the past several months, we tried to verify Oklahoma’s claim by filing information requests and collecting data from the governor’s office, the office of the attorney general, various district attorneys, the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, tribes, and the federal judiciary. We found that Oklahoma’s claims did not hold up to scrutiny.

Despite this, there is reason to worry that Oklahoma’s dubious numbers could still convince a majority of the Court. McGirt was decided by a slim 5–4 majority, and since then, the makeup of the Court has shifted. In his 2020 dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts largely agreed with Oklahoma’s claims that upholding tribal land and treaty rights in Oklahoma would lead to chaos. If five justices side with Oklahoma in Castro-Huerta, they could rewrite state jurisdiction on more than 300 reservations in the United States, changing how crimes are prosecuted on tribal land, not just in Oklahoma.

Such a consequential decision should be based on information that has been publicly verified. Instead, Oklahoma is asking the Supreme Court to issue a decision based on speculation at best—and inaccurate and misleading information at worst.

When we asked the Attorney General’s office where the 18,000 estimate came from, a spokesperson told us that “due to active litigation, our office cannot disclose that information at this time.” But the state seems to expect that, even without a public source, the Supreme Court will rely on this number.

The Court should proceed with caution. According to data collected from the Tulsa district attorney and the Oklahoma District Attorneys Council, the total number of criminal cases filed in eastern Oklahoma (where McGirt is relevant) fell by 13,131 from 2019 to 2021—the years that the reservations of the six tribes were affirmed. A significant number, but less than 18,000. (It should be noted: These are the same years that the coronavirus pandemic reduced the number of arrests and prosecutions in Oklahoma and affected rates across the country.)

To see if there was a gap in criminal prosecutions—the state also claims that tribal and federal efforts to take over cases were “woefully insufficient” and left an “alarming gap” of a suggested 10,000 cases—we compared the decrease in state cases filed with the number of federal and tribal cases filed. Since their various reservations were affirmed, the tribes have filed more than 11,400 felony and misdemeanor criminal cases, and U.S. attorneys have filed nearly 1,000 cases in federal court in 2021. Taken together, that leaves a gap of fewer than 1,000 cases, and some of that may be more the result of the pandemic than any problem specific to Oklahoma and the reservations.

This isn’t the first time Oklahoma has provided the Supreme Court with numbers and estimates that lack a public source. In the years that Oklahoma has litigated the reservation issue in front of the Court, its estimates of how many past convictions could be affected have increased from “hundreds, if not thousands” in 2018 to “over 3,000” in 2020 to “at least 76,000” in its petition to the Court to take the Castro-Huerta case last fall, a number widely cited in media coverage at the time. But eventually, courts decided that McGirt would not apply to past convictions, and the state has stopped using the 76,000 estimate.

When we initially asked the Governor’s office how it came up with that number, its communications director, Carly Atchison, told us that the 76,000 estimate, while now moot, represents all cases that could have been affected by McGirt from January 2005 to April 2021. However, “as far as methodology goes, you’d need to ask the district attorneys. Our office was presented with the estimate, we did not help to compile it,” she wrote to us in an email. In a follow-up, she again distanced the office from the 76,000 number, but she still could not provide any transparency about how the Governor’s office may have arrived at that figure in the first place.

Both the Governor’s office and Oklahoma’s petition claimed the estimate came from district attorneys, but no district attorneys we spoke with knew what the Governor’s office was talking about. “To my knowledge, we have made no such communication to the Governor’s office, nor has one been requested,” Tim Webster, the district attorney for Atoka, Bryan, and Coal Counties, told The Atlantic. Steve Kunzweiler, the DA for Tulsa—eastern Oklahoma’s most populous county—told us he did not supply the governor’s estimate. The Attorney General’s office and the law firm Paul, Weiss, which filed the petition, did not respond to The Atlantic’s request for comment.

The most accurate way to know how many prosecutions were affected by McGirt would be to simply count. After spending months filing requests for data with local district attorneys, we found that McGirt cases are being tracked inconsistently among Oklahoma prosecutors and in some places not at all. The state of Oklahoma funds and administers the criminal-justice agencies that are best equipped to collect data on the impact of McGirt. There is no reason that the public debate should still be based on estimates with secret sources, instead of real and publicly available numbers.

According to data provided by the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, we found that in the 18 months following the McGirt ruling, 68 people were released from Oklahoma’s custody to the street because of the decision. An additional 123 people were released to tribal or federal custody, 13 people successfully overturned one of their convictions but remain incarcerated by Oklahoma on other charges, and four defendants were already on probation at the time they won their appeal.

After months of litigation, Oklahoma courts eventually ruled that McGirt does not apply to old convictions. As a result, the actual number of Oklahoma inmates who have obtained relief based on McGirt is going down, not up. Of the 68 defendants released to the street, four have been returned to custody, eight more have had their order granting post-conviction relief revoked by an Oklahoma court, and in another 23 cases, district attorneys have filed motions asking the court to vacate its order granting the defendant relief. That leaves 33 Oklahoma defendants who—so far—have gotten off free and clear.

That’s not to say the McGirt decision had no impact. It was a considerable shift in criminal jurisdiction in eastern Oklahoma. When we spoke with Oklahoma prosecutors, they described the transition in criminal jurisdiction as tumultuous. “Chaotic is the best word to describe the environment that followed McGirt,” Kunzweiler, the Tulsa district attorney, told us.

But tribal leaders told us that though the transition was a huge logistical hurdle, the level of chaos was greatly influenced by the level of cooperation they received from local prosecutors and law enforcement. In some counties, local DAs and the tribes worked together to make sure that cases didn’t slip through the cracks. According to the Seminole Nation prosecuting attorney Timothy Brown, before the reservation was affirmed in April 2021, the local assistant DA sent the tribe a list of defendants who could be released from jail or state prosecution. Brown took that list and filed charges in the Seminole Nation’s court. In other districts, there was little or no coordination. Cherokee Nation Attorney General Sara Hill told us that in some counties within their reservations, “the elected district attorneys were so hostile to tribal jurisdiction that there was essentially zero communication … Cherokee Nation’s assistant attorney generals would literally sit through state-court criminal dockets … to identify cases that involved an Indian defendant.”

The tribes, for their part, have increased the capacity of their criminal-justice systems; they’ve filed thousands of cases, hired more prosecutors, and received federal funds to hire victim advocates and special prosecutors.

The Muscogee Nation, the tribe at the center of the 2020 Supreme Court decision, has hired nine criminal investigators to its Lighthorse Police Department, 20 more police officers, five new prosecutors, seven new legal support staff, and one new criminal investigator within the Muscogee Nation attorney general’s office. Since July 9, 2020, Muscogee Nation officials have made 1,622 arrests and filed 3,932 criminal cases. To date, Muscogee Nation has 63 cross-deputization agreements in place; this allows both state and tribal police to stop, arrest, and detain people no matter the Native status of the suspect or victim. Some tribes, such as the Chickasaw Nation, have even hired special assistant United States attorneys, who can prosecute cases in both tribal and federal courts, to help with the increased federal caseload. The Cherokee Nation alone committed nearly $30 million of its 2021–22 budget to criminal justice on its reservation—a historic amount. Of the eight new prosecutors that the Cherokee Nation has hired, four of them previously worked for Oklahoma district attorneys. Because tribal and federal prosecutors have higher salaries than Oklahoma prosecutors, Oklahoma DAs are losing staff and now facing shortages, according to Kunzweiler.

It is the constitutional role of Congress, not the Supreme Court, to change who has criminal jurisdiction on a reservation. Oklahoma started petitioning the Court to review the McGirt decision only after its attempts at congressional legislation to narrow the scope of the decision failed. Congress has acted, however. The most recent congressional spending bill allocated more than $62 million to help with the costs of increased tribal criminal jurisdiction. And the recent reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act expanded tribal jurisdiction over non-Native perpetrators for certain violent crimes.

In the McGirt case, Oklahoma invited the Supreme Court to make a decision based on fear and speculation rather than the law. Justice Neil Gorsuch and a majority of the Court rejected that invitation, noting that the disarray Oklahoma warned about wasn’t relevant to their judicial review. Two years later, we can now see that the state’s claims were exaggerated. But the role of the Court to interpret—not create—law hasn’t changed.

#us politics #news #mother jones #the atlantic #op eds #us supreme court #scotus #Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta #Oklahoma #native americans #native land #McGirt v. Oklahoma #Justice Brett Kavanaugh #justice neil gorsuch #Victor Castro-Huerta #Major Crimes Act #Cherokee Nation #2022 #Chief Justice John Roberts #Seminole Nation #Muscogee Nation #Chickasaw Nation #Violence Against Women Act #gov. kevin stitt #John O'Connor

[mariacallous]

On the second-to-last day of the 2021-22 term, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Oklahoma — and all other states — possesses concurrent jurisdiction with the federal government over crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country, wiping away centuries of tradition and practice.

Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta, a non-Indian person, was convicted by the state of Oklahoma for criminal child neglect of a citizen of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians within the reservation boundaries of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. That conviction came before the court’s 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma, which ruled that the Muscogee Nation’s reservation had not been disestablished upon the granting of statehood to Oklahoma. As a result of McGirt, the reservations of other tribes similarly situated to Muscogee are also now considered extant, including that of the Cherokee Nation. All land within an extant Indian reservation is considered “Indian country.”

McGirt made clear that much of eastern Oklahoma was Indian country and, as a result, that state and local authorities have no jurisdiction to prosecute Indian defendants accused of crimes on that land. Only the federal government and the tribes themselves can prosecute those defendants. That outcome has its roots in the Trade and Intercourse Act, which was passed by the first Congress in 1790 and federalized virtually all aspects of Indian affairs. Ever since then, Indian country criminal jurisdiction had been considered exclusively federal and tribal. The court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. Georgia confirmed that state law had no force in Indian country absent congressional authorization. However, the court chipped away at that general rule in United States v. McBratney (1881) and Draper v. United States (1896), allowing state prosecutions of non-Indians who committed crimes against non-Indians in Indian country, even in the absence of congressional authorization.

On Thursday, the Court reversed the presumption against state jurisdiction, holding that unless Congress acts to preempt state jurisdiction, states can prosecute non-Indians for all crimes committed in Indian country. Writing for the court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh listed several of the court’s precedents that conflicted with the Worcester, concluding that “the Worcester-era understanding of Indian country as separate from the State was abandoned later in the 1800s,” presumably meaning the McBratney and Draper decisions.

Once the majority concluded that state jurisdiction was presumptive, it then rejected Castro-Huerta’s related claim that the General Crimes Act preempted state law. Enacted in its current form during the codification of the United States Code in 1948, the GCA provides that “the general laws of the United States as to the punishment of offenses committed … within the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States … shall extend to the Indian country.” The court concluded that by 1948, the territorial separation between Indian tribes and states was no longer. Therefore, the GCA cannot mean that Indian country is a federal enclave where federal jurisdiction is exclusive. The Court reached a similar conclusion on the preemptive impact of Public Law 280, enacted in 1953, which authorized certain states to assert criminal jurisdiction over Indian country (but not Oklahoma).

The majority then analyzed the state’s jurisdiction under the federal Indian law preemption analysis under White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, which held that state jurisdiction in Indian country is preempted where it interferes with tribal self-government. The court found no tribal interest in preventing state criminal jurisdiction in this situation, focusing instead on the state’s interest in public safety within “its territory.” And since federal prosecutions are not barred by concurrent state jurisdiction, the court downplayed the federal interest as well. Important to the majority was the aftermath of the McGirt decision, which the court stated allowed some defendants to negotiate lenient plea deals with the federal government and allowed some to “go[] free.”

In dissent, Justice Neil Gorsuch praised the court’s decision in Worcester, noting that it was a deeply unpopular decision at the time, but it showed that “the rule of law meant something.” Criticizing the majority for discarding the Worcester presumption in the absence of congressional authorization, he concluded, “Where this Court once stood firm, today it wilts.” Comparing Oklahoma in the 2020s to Georgia in the 1930s, both of which asserted criminal jurisdiction in “lawless disregard” of tribal sovereignty, Gorsuch described a much-different history than the majority. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan joined Gorsuch’s dissent.

While the majority described a gradual assumption of state authority in Indian country aided by historical trends and ratified by a series of Supreme Court precedents, the dissent focused on Congress, which never explicitly authorized state jurisdiction over these types of defendants. Both majority and dissent accused the other of overstepping the role of the judiciary, but the dissent’s focus gave primacy to the role of Congress over the majority’s reliance on historical changes acknowledged and ratified by the judiciary.

Going forward, the majority asserted that this decision is broadly applicable “throughout the United States,” seemingly authorizing any state to assert criminal jurisdiction over crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians absent a contrary act of Congress applicable to a given tribe or reservation. The overall impact will depend on whether state prosecutors decide to start charging more crimes, but the potential of Castro-Huerta to disrupt Indian country criminal justice is massive.

In its conclusion, the dissent pointed out that Congress could easily amend Public Law 280 to correct this outcome, invoking Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s famed dissent in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. from 2007 that led to a quick reversal of that decision by Congress in 2008. Congressional lawmaking in the Indian country criminal jurisdiction space has been robust in recent decades, going so far as to authorize tribes to prosecute non-Indians for intimate partner violence and child abuse, so the dissent’s entreaty for a congressional fix could be effective.

[honeyleesblog]

Astrological Outlook and Personality Analysis for Individuals with a June 3rd Birthday

Smart, chatty, exuberant and with a unique capacity for movement and change of climate, with a specific propensity to the roaming life. Imperious, anxious, dynamic, fiery individuals - they show conciliatory abilities and can capably track down their lifestyle. They frequently show a specific familial person, despite the fact that they are typically enthusiastically forfeited for other people. They can be impassive, chilly, unconventional. The best calling for individuals brought into the world on this day is connected with scholarly work, the press, news-casting, instructing or travel. They likewise show surprising expertise in manual work and have creative capacities. Their imperfections: they are to some degree malignant, bad tempered, and, surprisingly, handily irritated. They appreciate sterile contentions and immaterial questions. These imperfections are more unmistakable in individuals brought into the world during the day. What undermines them? Collaboration and associations with others will be fairly challenging for them. They will most likely be unable to pivot unreasonable changes, whether inside or brought about by life altering situations. In such a case, your life is spent in interruptions and diversion. Astrological Outlook and Personality Analysis for Individuals with a June 3rd Birthday 

 Assuming your birthday is June 3, your zodiac sign is Gemini June 3 - character and character character: great, autonomous, focused, adversary, mean, awful calling: model, fireman, designer tones: beige, purple, daffodil stone: pearl creature: camel plant: red oak fortunate numbers: 5,14,16,24,26,27 very fortunate number: 32 Occasions and observances - June 3 World bike Day Banner of Argentina.svg Argentina: Italian Settler Day. Regulation 24,561 June 3 VIP birthday events. Who was conceived that very day as you? 1901: Josდ© Lins do Rego, Brazilian essayist and columnist (d. 1957). 1903: Pedro Garcდ­a de la Huerta Matte, Chilean government official (f. 1994). 1906: Josephine Pastry specialist, French artist and artist (d. 1975). 1910: Wilfred Thesiger, English wayfarer and essayist (d. 2003). 1911: Paulette Goddard, American entertainer (f. 1990). 1913: Pedro Mir, Dominican public writer (f. 2000). 1916: Aldo Zeoli, Argentine military and astronautical architect (f. 2003). 1922: Alain Resnais, French producer (d. 2014). 1924: Olga Lamas, tango vocalist, with a diverting collection (f. 1988). 1924: Jimmy Rogers, American blues artist. 1924: Torsten Wiesel, Swedish analyst, 1981 Nobel Prize victor for medication and physiology (d. 1997). 1925: Tony Curtis, American entertainer (d. 2010). 1926: Allen Ginsberg, American writer (d. 1997). 1927: Eliseo Mourino, Argentine soccer player (d. 1961). 1928: Donald Judd, American stone worker (d. 1994). 1929: Werner Arber, Swiss microbiologist, 1978 Nobel Prize victor for physiology or medication. 1930: Marion Zimmer Bradley, American essayist (d. 1999). 1931: Raდºl Castro, Cuban lawmaker and progressive, sibling of Fidel Castro (1926-2016) and leader of Cuba somewhere in the range of 2008 and 2018. 1931: Walter Malosetti, Argentine jazz guitarist and arranger (f. 2013). 1931: John Norman, American sci-fi author. 1931: Lindy Remigino, American competitor. 1933: Roberto Bodegas, Spanish movie producer. 1933: Anthony Harvey, American movie producer. 1935: Carlos Jimდ©nez Villarejo, Spanish law specialist. 1935: Imanol Murua, Spanish legislator (f. 2008). 1936: Larry McMurtry, American writer and screenwriter. 1936: Enric Gensana, Spanish footballer (d. 2005). 1939: Steve Dalkowski, American baseball player. 1939: Marcos Velდ¡squez, Uruguayan performer and artist (d. 2010). 1942: Curtis Mayfield, American performer (d. 1999). 1943: Billy Cunningham, American b-ball player. 1944: Edith McGuire, American competitor. 1944: Tony Vilas, Argentine entertainer (f. 2013). 1945: Isabel de los დ?ngeles Ruano, Guatemalan author and artist. 1946: Michael Clarke American performer, of the band The Byrds. 1946: Penelope Wilton, English entertainer. 1947: Mickey Finn, English percussionist, of the band T. Rex. 1948: Carlos Franzetti, Argentine writer, piano player and arranger, champ of a Latin Grammy grant. 1950: Frდ©dდ©ric Franდ§ois, Italian vocalist and arranger. 1950: Suzi Quatro, American vocalist and entertainer. 1952: Billy Powell, American keyboardist, of the Lynyrd Skynyrd band. 1954: Dulce (f. 2003) and Inma Chacდ³n, Spanish authors. 1954: Jiri Georg Dokoupil, German vanguard painter, brought into the world in Czechoslovakia. 1954: Claudio Hohmann, Chilean specialist and legislator. 1954: Angela Irene, Argentine people vocalist. 1956: Danny Wilde, American performer, of the band The Rembrandts. 1961: Lawrence Lessig, American attorney and author. 1962: Susannah Constantine, English style advisor. 1964: Doro, German vocalist, of the band Warlock. 1964: Kerry Lord, American guitarist, of the band Slayer. 1964: James Purefoy, English entertainer. 1967: Takehiro Ohno, Japanese-Argentine culinary specialist. 1970: Peter Tდ¤gtgren, Swedish performer, of the Deception band. 1973: Sargis Sargsian, Armenian tennis player. 1973: Tonmi Lillman, American performer, of the band Lordi. 1973: Sebastiდ¡n Teysera, Uruguayan vocalist, from the band La Vela Puerca. 1974: Kelly Jones, Welsh vocalist, of the band Stereophonics. 1974: Martდ­n Karpan, Argentine entertainer. 1975: Russel Hobbs, American drummer, of the Gorillaz band. 1977: Cristiano Marques Gomes, Brazilian soccer player. 1979: Redimi2 (Willy Gonzდ¡lez Cruz), Dominican Christian rap vocalist. 1982: Yelena Isinbდ¡yeva, Russian competitor. 1983: Javiera Mena, Chilean vocalist lyricist, maker and performer. 1985: Papiss Cissდ©, Senegalese footballer. 1985: Dan Ewing, Australian entertainer. 1985: Tavion La'Corey Mathis, American vocalist, of the band Pretty Ricky. 1985: ვ?ukasz Piszczek, Clean footballer. 1986: Rafael Nadal, Mallorcan tennis player. 1986: Al Horford, Dominican b-ball player. 1987: Lalaine, American entertainer and vocalist. 1987: Masami Nagasawa, Japanese entertainer. 1988: Tomomi Nakagawa, Japanese vocalist. 1989: Imogen Poots, English entertainer. 1989: Megu, Japanese vocalist, of the band Negicco. 1991: Natasha Dupeyrდ³n, Mexican entertainer. 1992: Mario Gდ¶tze, German footballer. 1998: Logan Fabbro, Canadian entertainer and artist.

[cchiroque]

POSTULAN EN LAS ELECCIONES REGIONALES Y MUNICIPALES 2022

A LA ALCALDÍA DE PIURA

N°

NOMBRE

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

JAVIER FERNANDO MIGUEL ATKINS LERGGIOS

PODEMOS PERÚ.

2

GABRIEL ANTONIO MADRID ORUÉ

UNIDAD REGIONAL

3

SEGUNDO LUCIANO VALDIVIEZO RODRÍGUEZ

FUERZA REGIONAL

4

FÉLIX CHAN APUY

ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO

5

LUIS GUILLERMO CASTRO PÉREZ

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

6

PARTIDO DEMOCRÁTICO SOMOS PERÚ

JOSÉ ELÍAS AGUILAR SILVA

7

JOSÉ LUIS MOREY REQUEJO

CONTIGO REGIÓN

8

JUAN CARLOS RUIZ VALENCIA

FUERZA POPULAR

9

JOSÉ DAGOBERTO MELGAR JIMÉNEZ

PARTIDO RENOVACIÓN POPULAR

10

WALTER JESÚS FERNÁNDEZ PEÑA

FRENTE ESPERANZA

11

INGRID MILAGROS WIESSE LEÓN

MOVIMIENTO PIURA RENACE

CANDIDATOS A LA PROVINCIA DE MORROPÓN - CHULUCANAS

N°

NOMBRE

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

JHOANN AUGUSTO HERRERA SANCHEZ

ACCIÓN POPULAR

2

EDBERG CESAR VALLADOLID BERECHE

SOMOS PERÚ

3

MANUEL CAPITAN SANTISTEBAN

ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO

4

WILMER WILFREDO CASTILLO ORDINOLA

FUERZA POPULAR

5

OSCAR ARNALDO BERRU VARGAS

FUERZA REGIONAL

6

ELVIS EDGARDO JIMENEZ CHINCHAY

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

7

RICHARD HERNAN BACA PALACIOS

UNIDAD REGIONAL

8

CARMEN ROSA CAMPOS MENDOZA

PERÚ LIBRE

9

FERMIN EDILBERTO FARIAS ZAPATA

CONTIGO PERÚ

10

HERNAN PASAPERA RAMIREZ

RENACE

 

 

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE BUENOS AIRES

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

CESAR AUGUSTO RAMIREZ MEZONES

UNIDAD REGIONAL

2

BRAULIO ISAIAS CAMPOVERDE CASTILLO,

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

3

ALDO NEPTALI VIERA PACHERRE

DEMÓCRATA VERDE

4

EDWIN VICENTE PRIETO VIERA

SOMOS PERÚ

5

RIVES RAUL RAMIREZ MANRIQUE

FUERZA REGIONAL

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE MORROPÓN

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

MIGUEL ANGEL RUESTA CARRASCO

UNIDAD REGIONAL

2

JUAN FRANCISCO GRANDA MONTENEGRO

CONTIGO REGIÓN

3

EDIN SULLON ARANDA

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

4

LUIS ALBERTO LAMADRID FARFAN

DEMÓCRATA VERDE

5

TEDDY SANCHEZ MONTENEGRO

RENACE

6

JOSE GABRIEL OLAYA GARCIA

SOMOS PERÚ

7

LUZ MARIA RAMIREZ HUERTAS

JUNTOS POR EL PERÚ

8

VILMA RENEE SILVA CASTILLO

FUERZA REGIONAL

 

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE YAMANGO

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

ALDUVAR GUEVARA NUÑEZ

PERÚ LIBRE

2

MITRIDATES GARCIA GARCIA

UNIDAD REGIONAL

3

DARWIN CORDOVA PEÑA

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

4

ALAN CORDOVA VELASQUEZ

RENACE

5

ELEAZAR CORDOVA GARCIA

FUERZA REGIONAL

6

AGUSTIN LUMBRE RODRIGUEZ

CONTIGO REGIÓN

7

BRANDO AQUILES CORDOVA CARHUAPOMA

SOMOS PERÚ

 

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE LA MATANZA

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

ORLANDO CHIROQUE ANASTACIO

UNIDAD REGIONAL

2

LUIS CASTILLO PEÑA

CONTIGO REGIÓN

3

JOEL CHAVEZ MONTALBAN

PERÚ LIBRE

4

CESAR ABRAHAM ZUÑIGA YENQUE

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

5

JOSE ABEL TIMANA SERNAQUE

PODEMOS PERÚ

6

KAREN YARLENY ALVARADO SUAREZ

DEMÓCRATA VERDE

7

ERIKA GIULIANA HERNANDEZ RAMOS DE FIESTAS

ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO

8

VILMA MACO VALVERDE

FUERZA REGIONAL

9

EVER NOE ZAPATA MIO

SOMOS PERÚ

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE SANTA CATALINA DE MOZA

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

ERICK MARLON BERRU DOMINGUEZ

UNIDAD REGIONAL

2

ASUNCION CORDOVA SAAVEDRA

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

3

HUMBERTO CASTILLO SANDOVAL

PERÚ LIBRE

4

MERLY YULISSA CORDOVA ANGLADE

CONTIGO REGIÓN

5

GILMER MARIO OLIVA JIMENEZ

SOMOS PERÚ

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE SAN JUAN DE BIGOTE

 

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

VICTOR RAUL JIMENEZ ESPINOZA

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

2

JAIME AUGUSTO CIENFUEGOS HUERTAS

ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO

3

ALDO ERICK ALVAREZ OCAÑA

SOMOS PERÚ

4

EDILBERTO MEDINA JIMENEZ

FUERZA REGIONAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE SANTO DOMINGO

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

ELMER AUGUSTO PEREZ ROJAS

UNIDAD REGIONAL

2

WALTER RAMIREZ ROJAS

CONTIGO REGIÓN

3

ELVIS BARRETO JIMENEZ

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

4

LUIS ALBERTO LOPEZ CRUZ

PERÚ LIBRE

5

FELIX ENRIQUE MARTIN LOPEZ GUERRERO

ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO

 

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE CHALACO

 

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

MANUEL ORLANDO SAAVEDRA LOPEZ

UNIDAD REGIONAL

2

DUBER ROMAN RAMIREZ

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

3

EDINSON ROSARIO ROJAS QUISPE

FUERZA REGIONAL

4

ANTERO YOVANI ROMAN LOPEZ

RENACE

 

ALCALDÍA DEL DISTRITO DE SALITRAL

 

N°

NOMBRE 

PARTIDO O MOVIMIENTO

1

JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ OLIVA

CONTIGO REGIÓN

2

ELKIN NARCISO JAUREGUI YONG

UNIDAD REGIONAL

3

JOSE LUIS CHOZO CALVAY

REGIÓN PARA TODOS

4

RONALD ESCARATE JIMENEZ

PODEMOS

5

BISMARK BALLESTEROS VIGIL

ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO

6

JOSE ROGELIO BALLESTEROS CULCAS

SOMOS PERÚ

7

PITER ALEX GARCIA CUELLAR

PERÚ LIBRE

[northcarolinaprelawland-blog]

New Supreme Court Ruling Expands Criminal Jurisdiction on Native American Land to States

By Kyra Goins, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Class of 2023

July 11, 2022

On Wednesday, June 29th, 2022, the Supreme Court made critical decisions regarding jurisdiction in Native American lands [1]. The decision made in Oklahoma vs. Castro-Huerta was perhaps the most controversial ruling the court has made this term regarding Native American affairs [3]. At its core, the decision establishes “that states have concurrent jurisdiction with the federal government over crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian Country” [3].

It has been established that the federal government has the ability to prosecute crimes involving Native Americans. In fact, the court reaffirmed this federal power in their decision of the Denezpi vs. United States case, where Merle Denezpi, a Navajo Nation citizen was tried for aggravated sexual assault against a member of the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe [3]. Denezpi was tried both by a Native American court and by a federal district court, and Denezpi claimed this was an incident of double jeopardy [3]. The Supreme Court shot down Denezpi’s allegation, affirming the validity of the court proceedings, as the Native American court and district court belong to two separate jurisdictions [3]. It is under the Major Crimes Act, as shown below, that asserts that federal courts have jurisdiction “exclusive of the states, over Indians who commit [certain] offenses, regardless of whether the victim is an Indian or non-Indian” [4].

However, the ruling in Oklahoma vs. Castro-Huerta expanded upon United States jurisdiction in crimes involving Native Americans. The case began when Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta, who is not a tribal member, was convicted of neglecting his step-daughter, a member of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians [1]. Under the care of Castro-Huerta, his step-daughter, who is physically disabled, was undernourished, becoming dehydrated and emaciated, and neglected to the point of becoming “covered in lice and excrement” [1]. The state of Oklahoma then tried Castro-Huerta and his wife, and sentenced Castro-Huerta to 35-year jail sentence [1].

During the trial of Castro-Huerta in Oklahoma in 2020, the Supreme Court was simultaneously deciding on a significant case regarding Native American land in Oklahoma, McGirt vs. Oklahoma [1]. In the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Court decided that “Congress had never formally disestablished the Creek Reservation and therefore a large swath of eastern Oklahoma should be considered Indian territory” [1]. The case was specifically in regards to the issue of federal prosecution of crimes, and the decision subsequently called into question previous cases where the state of Oklahoma prosecuted, as “under the law, crimes involving Native Americans on a reservation are under federal, not state, jurisdiction” [2].

The Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt vs. Oklahoma came just shortly after the conviction of Castro-Huerta, and Castro-Huerta’s lawyers promptly challenged his conviction, arguing that only the federal government, and not the state of Oklahoma, could lawfully try and convict him [1]. It was this predicament that reached the Supreme Court in June. The Court ruled with Oklahoma, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing the majority opinion stating that “the Constitution ‘allows a State to exercise jurisdiction in Indian country’” and that “‘Indian country is part of the State, not separate from the State’” [1].

Many people, including activists for and members of Native American communities, have expressed concern about this new ruling. The executive director of the National Indigenous Women’s Resource Center, Lucy Simpson, cited previous incidents of states having criminal jurisdiction over Native lands and the result of “ ‘a decrease in prosecutions of crimes committed against Native victims and an increase of violence against Native victims’” [3]. Others worry more broadly about how jurisdiction will be divided among soveriegns going forward, and the practical implications of how this ruling may complicate court proceedings [3].

______________________________________________________________

[1] de Vogue, A. (2022, June 29). States can prosecute non-tribal members who commit crimes on Native American reservations, Supreme Court says. MSN. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/states-can-prosecute-non-tribal-members-who-commit-crimes-on-native-american-reservations-supreme-court-says/ar-AAZ0Jww

[2] Ehrlich, J., & Vogue, A. de. (2020, July 9). Supreme Court Rules Broad Swath of Oklahoma is Native American land for purposes of federal criminal law. CNN. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/09/politics/tribal-territory-supreme-court-ruling/index.html?cid=external-feeds_iluminar_msn

[3] Krol, D. U. (2022, July 5). Tribal law experts fear the effects of the Supreme Court on jurisdiction and sovereignty. MSN. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tribal-law-experts-fear-the-effects-of-the-supreme-court-on-jurisdiction-and-sovereignty/ar-AAZdF6n  

[4] The United States Department of Justice. (2020, January 22). 679. the major crimes act-18 U.S.C. § 1153. The United States Department of Justice. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-679-major-crimes-act-18-usc-1153

[iowaprelawland]

A Break From Tradition

By Emily Harkin, University of Iowa, Class of 2023

July 7, 2022

On June 29th, 2022, the Supreme Court overruled, in part, a precendent and a lawful ideology towards indigenous people that had been held for nearly 200 years. In this landmark decision, they diminished the effects of the ruling of McGirt v. Oklahoma with the 5-4 decision to uphold Oklahoma in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huetra.

In 1831, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an established decision from the Supreme Court. It remained a continuance of the judicial view of Native American tribes being as John Marshall quotes in Cherokee v. Georgia (year) not foregin states, but as “domestic dependent nation(s).” This was an interpretation of the Article III of the Constitution about Court Jurisdiction in response to the Georgia State Legislative creating legal framework that would allow the Cherokee nation to be “divided up, and distributed to the white citizens in the state of Georgia.” [4]

Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States [6]

More recently, McGirt v. Oklahoma originated from a lower court, the Oklahoma Court of Appeals. In this 2020 case, a tribal member of the Muscogee (Creek Nation) was found guilty of crimes against a minor citzen of the United States within tribal lands. In the court of law, Jimcy McGirt argued that he could not be guilty under Oklahoma legal jurisdiction due to the Indian Major Crimes Act. This ended as a 5-4 decision with the dissent of Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Kavanaugh in 2020. Their dissenting opinion was written by Chief Justice Roberts with Justice Alito and Justice Kavanaugh, and in part Justice Clarence, who had accepted the argument from Oklahoma about the boundary establishment of the Creek Reservation. Overall, the majority decided and accepted that there was a previous determination of Creek Nation boarders that was established by an 1866 treaty. With acceptance to those boarders, the majority decided that the case falls under the federal statute that decrees these understood boundaries are constituted as a reservation that can only be lessened or ‘disestablished’ by a “clear expression of congressional intent.” [3]

In the past week, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huetra came before the court when Victor Manuel-Castro Huerta was found guilty for neglect against his Native American step daughter within the confines of the Cherokee Reservation in the special court of Child Negect in the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. [2] This case challenged, in part, the Supreme Court ruling from the McGirt v. Oklahoma ruling. This 5-4 decision against Castro-Huetra allows states to now have “the power to prosecute non-Indian crimes within Native lands.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued the majority opinion, stating “Indian country is part of the State, not separate from the state.” [1] This statement directly contrasts and disregards John Marshall’s deeply influential declaration of their separation from statehood by calling indigenous tribes nations. Gorsuch, a republican-appointed judge, wrote the dissent for this case. He pointed out that their was an intentional avoidance of tribal sovereignty in Justice Kavanaugh’s written majority opinion. Gorsuch wrote that this had little to do with the crime and punishment of Castro-Huetra, but rather Oklahoma wanting “to gain a legal foothold for its wish to exercise jurisdiction over crimes involving tribal members on tribal lands.” [5] Gorsuch echoed his opinion in the McGirt v. Oklahoma 2020 case, when he wrote that the “Trail of Tears was a promise” where “the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever” and cited the 1832 Treaty, Art. XIV, 7 Stat. 368 that gave Native Americans sovereignty, self governance free from the states.

McGirt v. Oklahoma and Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta are very similar legal jurisdictional arguments regarding Native American reservations. Although the decisions are extremely different in two similar court cases with McGirt and Castro-Huetra, this decision does not necessarily overturn Castro-Huetra. However, this decision will effect more than Oklahoma, but rather all future indigenous jurisdictional disputes. [1]

______________________________________________________________

Ablavsky, Gregory, and     Elizabeth Hidalgo Reese. “Opinion | The Supreme Court Strikes Again - This     Time at Tribal Sovereignty.” The     Washington Post, WP Company, 3 July 2022,     https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/01/castro-huerta-oklahoma-supreme-court-tribal-sovereignty/.    

“Oklahoma v. Castro-Huetra.” Oyez,     https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/21-429.

“McGirt v. Oklahoma.” Oyez,     https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-9526

Cherokee     Nation v. Georgia - Oregon.gov. https://www.oregon.gov/ode/students-and-family/equity/NativeAmericanEducation/Documents/SB13%20Curriculum/SC%20Summary%207_Cherokee%20Nation%20v%20Georgia.pdf.    

Francis-Smith, Janice. “Gorsuch     Dissent Accuses Oklahoma of 'Unlawful Power Grab'.” The Journal Record, 2 July 2022, https://journalrecord.com/2022/07/01/gorsuch-dissent-accuses-oklahoma-of-unlawful-power-grab/.    

Constitution of the United States §177–§178 [Article     III, Sections 1–2].     https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/HMAN-112/pdf/HMAN-112-pg78.pdf.

[mvydude]

Wednesday's ruling limits a Supreme Court decision handed down two years ago that said a large chunk of eastern Oklahoma was considered Native American reservations, meaning only tribal and federal authorities — not state officials — could handle criminal prosecutions on that land.

Gorsuch authored that 2020 ruling, and the court's liberal wing joined him then as well, forming the majority at the time. But now, the court has an expanded 6-3 conservative majority. Gorsuch, who's from Colorado, has had a track record of standing up for tribal rights in his opinions.

"One can only hope the political branches and future courts will do their duty to honor this Nation's promises even as we have failed today to do our own," Gorsuch wrote in his dissent.

The case, known as Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, concerned Victor Castro-Huerta, a non-Native American who was convicted by state authorities of neglecting his 5-year-old stepdaughter, a Native American, in Cherokee Nation territory. An Oklahoma appeals court tossed out his conviction after the 2020 Supreme Court ruling. Federal authorities then stepped in and charged Castro-Huerta, who pleaded guilty. He has not been sentenced.

#impeachscotus #impeachclarencethomas #impeachthomas #expand the court #no shame #cover up

[masterofd1saster]

CJ court watch 29jun22 - interesting case

SCt decided Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U. S. __ (2022) today by a vote of 5 - 4. J. Kavanaugh wrote for the majority. J. Gorsuch - from Colorado - wrote for the dissent.

In McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U. S. _ (2020) the Court decided that most of Oklahoma was Indian Country for the purposes of criminal jurisdiction.

Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta lived in Tulsa, Oklahoma, with his wife and their several children, including Castro-Huerta’s then-5-year-old stepdaughter, who is a Cherokee Indian. The stepdaughter has cerebral palsy and is legally blind.

He abused her horribly, and the state prosecuted him. He is not an Indian; indeed, he is illegally present in the U.S. He appealed his conviction on the basis that the state didn't have jurisdiction since he committed the crime in Indian Country.

We conclude that the Federal Government and the State have concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country.

After his successful appeal, the feds prosecuted him, and he was sentenced to seven years. So what? Oklahoma had sentenced him to 35 years. With the SCt decision, Huerta can now go back to serving 35 years.

[guadalajaradispensas]

film 168270

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-6K9W-W6?i=187&cc=1874591&cat=29324

188/001 oah 2566 pt.2

189/002 168270

191/004 oah 2566

192/005 slate

193/006 continua

194/007 agustin garcia & margarita villegas / tepic

200/013 joaquin bermudes & maria felix castillon / mascota

209/022 vicente ayala & ? / zapopan

216/029 benito angel rojas & maria josefa rojas / chapala

221/034 ygnacio garamendi & andrea delgado / juchipila

235/048 aniceto monteon & luisa navarro / ocotlan

240/053 valentin araujo & eugenia fernandez / tepatitlan

250/063 severiano macias & feliciana vanegas / tepatitlan

254/067 cesario sabablia & diega velasco / ayutla

260/073 antonio nino & rosalia cedra / ahualulco

264/077 rafael padilla & josefa de la torre / tepatitlan

270/083 jesus romo & ygnacia torres / guadalajara

273/086 ramon rios & dolores mendez / guadalajara

278/091 miguel ybarra & rafaela solorzano / ameca

285/098 miguel aguallo & rosalia ulloa / nochistlan

289/102 juan jose nepomuceno villegas & victoria banuelos / colotlan

295/108 estanislao mesa & catalina villagrana / ?

296/109 manuel (?) & ygnacia real / chapala

301/114 antonio diaz & severa centeno / guadalajara

307/120 ygnacio garamendi & andrea delgado / juchipila

312/125 higinio fernandez & luz colmenero / jerez

318/131 eduardo munoz & guadalupe munoz / tlaltenango

324/137 remigio garcia & maria nieves medina / jalpa

332/145 jose maria castillo & petronila mojica / autlan

336/149 victor gomez portugal & mariana gil / guadalajara

339/152 jose flores & isabel navarro / ocotlan

347/160 eustaquio (?) sanchez & manuela morales / ixtlan

355/168 eustaquio gonzalez & juana gonzalez / tomatlan

361/174 francisco preciado & ygnacia santana / tecolotlan

367/180 jose serviano & rosalia suchil / jocotepec

376/189 jose zepeda & dolores guerrero / cocula *tree 376/189

380/193 ygnacio gallegos & guadalupe lopez / pinos

389/202 carlos ramos & paula lira / tonala

392/205 trinidad patino & maria san juana aguirre / arandas

397/210 francisco madera & teresa cacheco / zacatecas

401/214 juan diaz & jacoba fregoso / cocula

406/219 siriaco gonzalez & ygnacia delgado / jalpa

414/227 nasario villar &  antonia cesena / tepic

422/235 marcial paredes & juana maria cruz / jalostotitlan

428/241 leandro loera & pabla velasquez / guadalajara

435/248 lino navarro & trinidad perez / ?

441/254 estanislao mesa & catalina villagrana / teuchitlan

455/268 lino fregoso & lorenza souray(?) / guadalajara

458/271 jose del refugio garcia & guadalupe carrillo / nochistlan

462/275 encarnacion ramos & juliana ramirez / guadalajara

467/280 eusevio anaya & isabel mendiola / guadalajara

471/284 matias gomez & ana otero / jerez

478/291 carlos agustin hirshausen(de Hannover, alemania/from Hannover,Germany) & manuela corsini / zacatecas

487/300 secundino lopez & mauricia guerra / venado *tree 489/302

491/304 pedro magdaleno & maria guzman / encarnacion

498/311 viscencio jimenez & maria gonzalez / tepatitlan

504/317 antonio cartiyo & maria cartiyo / matehuala

511/324 rito banuelos & tomasa banuelos / mesquitic

518/331 antonio gonzalez & merced razo / ocotlan

526/339 jose maria martin & maria jesus landeros / encarnacion

533/346 lorenzo ramos & bonifacia camarillo / lagos

536/349 julian periera & pilar banuelos / jerez

542/355 gregorio lara & felipa abedoy / calvillo

547/360 domigno moreno & estefana varela / ?

554/367 eduardo gonzalez & ? / tequila

556/369 teodoro castro & atanacia castro / san cristobal

564/377 tiburcio olivares & ana hernandez / lagos

570/383 eugenio mora & victoriana mora / cuquio

576/389 laureano ortiz & rita gutierrez / huejuquilla

580/393 florentino martinez & juana evangelista moncada / san blas

585/398 francisco gallardo & micaela mora / zacatecas

591/404 ygnacio silva & ygnacia carrillo / ?

600/413 bonifacio hernandez & petra perez / tuscacuesco

610/423 marcelo muniz & petronila miranda / jerez

616/429 maximo chavez & benigna benito / venado

621/434 jose moran & maria sanchez / san jose de garcia

624/437 santiago yniguez & guadalupe garcia / yahualica

629/442 francisco gonzalez & maria jesus moreno / adoves

635/448 calixto reyes & martian castorena / rincon

639/452 onofre alonzo & vicenta ornleas / tepatitlan

644/457 pilar rovalcava & rafaela lepes / teocalitche

650/463 ? & aguastina hernandez / analco

654/467 antonio perez & francisca caldera / teocaltiche

659/472 juan nepomuceno gonzalez & vicenta carlos / tepetongo

669/482 ylario gonzalez & petronila avila / ?

673/486 yldefonzo parra & josefa carrillo / ixtlan *tree 674/487

679/492 jose maria ramos & benita (?) / sayula

682/495 andres coronel & francisca morales / aguascalientes

686/499 maximo ramos & guadalupe de luna / tepechitlan

691/504 servulo rocha & eligia ybarra / ?

694/507 juan jose castaneda & trinidad membrila / tamazula

702/515 vicente gonzalez & (?) huerta / totatiche

708/521 leonardo camposano & guadalupe aguilar / tuscacuesco

711/524 ygnacio huerta & ygnacia lopez / tepechitlan

718/531 marcial acosta & vicenta montes / ahuacatlan

723/536 antonio dena & maria villagrana / ahuactlan

733/546 bacilio martinez & calixta juarez / fresnillo

739/552 jose de la encarnacion tejeda & marcelian fuentes / arandas

744/557 rufino flores & crisanta montealvo / teul

749/562 rafael gallo & maxima reynoso / jalostotitlan

757/570 francisco placencia & quirina carrillo / cuquio

763/576 santos gonzalez & damiana romo / lagos

769/582 lazaro morales & refugio mansilla / ystlahuacan

774/587 jose maria jaimes & josefa orozco / arandas

777/590 ygnacio gonzalez & juana maria perez / banderas

783/596 pablo castaneda & aleja mercado / yahualica

788/601 antonio lopez & pioquinta magallanes / tepetongo *tree 795/608

796/609 ygnacio silva & petra garcia / jalpa

803/616 continua

804/617 oah 2566 fin

#1835

[juarezesdeporte]

ALGODONEROS VISITA A DORADOS

Viene el líder Algodoneros a la capital*****Agarrón en Cuauhtémoc*****Tiene Faraones última oportunidad en casa*****Reciben Mineros visita incomoda*****Quiere Mazorqueros recuperar terreno al iniciar la penúltima jornada de temporada regular del Campeonato Estatal de Beisbol Bankaool 2019 temporada Ángel "Bucky" Pérez

En medio de gran expectación, hoy a las 19:30 horas inicia la penúltima jornada de temporada regular del Campeonato Estatal de Beisbol Bankaool 2019 temporada Ángel “Bucky” Pérez. Solo seis partidos restan para dar paso a los playoffs y de momento nada está definido, solo el líder Algodoneros de Delicias y el sublíder Manzaneros de Cuauhtémoc, tienen asegurado su lugar para la postemporada y en la parte baja de la tabla el colero Faraones de NCG todavía cuenta posibilidades de avanzar entre los mejores ocho. Por lo anterior, la presente es una de las temporadas más cerradas de los últimos años, con todavía mucho de por juego.

Van Algodoneros por la novena Algodoneros de Delicias (19-5) ha ganado sus ocho series en disputa, es el mejor equipo del torneo, tiene al líder de bateo y con todo ese palmares visita desde esta noche en el Estadio Monumental a los Dorados de Chihuahua (11-13), que en su última salida lograron una victoria que los volvió a la vida. El veterano Luis Eduardo “La Changa” García líder de bateo con .500 de porcentaje y que fue campeón con la franela de los Dorados de Chihuahua en el 2008, busca seguir su racha ofensiva, cuando enfrente al peor pitcheo de liga con 7.98 en carreras limpias admitidas. Ubicado en zona de clasificación en séptimo lugar de la general con 11-13 en ganados y perdidos, Dorados viene de conquistar una gran victoria de 4-1 en el último juego de la serie ante Manzaneros de Cuauhtémoc, que además de cortar una racha de siete descalabros, les devolvió esa confianza que se había ido de vacaciones, luego de perder un día antes su quinta serie en forma consecutiva. Probables abridores Junio 11.- Joaquín Lara (3-1, 3.89 PCL) vs Misael Verduzco (2-0, 4.50 PCL) Junio 12.- Ever Villarreal (0-2, 10.57 PCL) vs Ismael Tijerina (3-1, 5.50 PCL Junio 13.- Felipe Hernández (0-0, 1.29 PCL) vs Mario González (4-0, 4.09 PCL) Hace un año Delicias ganó la serie 2-1

Gran banquete en la capital de la manzana Pronosticándose tres llenos en el Gran Estadio Cuauhtémoc, Manzaneros recibe a los Indios de Ciudad Juárez, en una serie donde chocan dos de los tres equipos que para muchos son serios candidatos al título. Considerada como la mejor afición del estado, los hinchas de la VI Zona tendrán tres partidos con sabor a playoffs, se verán las caras los equipos que tienen el pitcheo colectivo de la liga; Indios ocupa el sitio de honor con 4.50 y Manzaneros le sigue con 4.71. Los campeones (16-8) con la calificación en la bolsa, son segundo de la general y presentan como novedad la presencia del estelar cerrador José Ángel Hernández quien va reportar desde esta noche. Indios de Juárez (14-10) firme en el tercer lugar de la tabla, busca seguir la racha ganadora con Eduardo “Walo” Rivera como manejador la cual está en 4-0 y el slugger Yahir Gurrola líder de carreras producidas con 38 tratará de consolidarse en dicho departamento. El año pasado, con Rivera como brazo derecho del manager Beto Rojas, Manzaneros probó las mieles del título. “Antes que nada será una gran serie, claro que es muy importante tener la información del rival, pero el beisbol de momentos y rachas, lo que en ocasiones rompe cualquier estrategia”. señalo Rivera sobre la posible ventaja de conocer a los rivales en turno. Probables abridores Junio 11.- Pedro Zamora (4-1, 4.02 PCL) vs Jesús Huerta (3-4, 3.18 PCL) Junio 12.- Rafael Servín (3-0, 1.23 PCL) vs Aldo Salinas (4-1, 4.29 PCL) Junio 13.- Daniel Valdez (1-0, 7.07 PCL) vs Luis Fernando Miranda (3-2, 3.28 PCL) Hace un año Cuauhtémoc ganó la serie 2-1

Faraones sin tiempo que perder A tres juegos de la zona de clasificación, los Faraones de NCG saben que desde hoy se pueden estar jugando su última oportunidad de estar en los playoffs. La V zona recibe en el “Luis Cobos Huerta” a los Venados de Madera actuales líderes de bateo .341 y quienes llegan a un estadio ideal para los bateadores. Faraones (6-18), está obligado a ganar los tres partidos y esperar que Mineros y Soles sean barridos y así jugarse el todo por el todo en la última serie cuando visiten a los Soles de Ojinaga. En cambio Venados (13-11) cuarto puesto de la tabla general, con una victoria habrá asegurar su lugar en la postemporada. Se cocina un duelo de bombarderos, por los de casa con su manager-jugador Daniel Yépez que comparte el liderato de jonrones con Alejandro Pineda de Dorados de Chihuahua ambos con 11 y por los visitantes Francisco Sánchez que es cuarto en la lista de los jonrones con 8 y tercero entre los mejores productores con 31 remolcadas. Probables abridores Junio 11.- Luis Márquez (1-2, 8.39 PCL) vs Samuel Zazueta (4-3, 4.76 PCL) Junio 12.- Felipe Hernández (0-0, 4.50 PC) vs Jesús Manuel Bustamante (2-1, 5.57 PCL) Junio 13.- Obed Esqueda (2-3, 4.58 PCL) vs Luis Manuel Mendoza (2-1, 3.81 PCL) Hace un año NCG ganó la serie 2-1

Regresa Beto con otra piel La noche del viernes será diferente a cualquier otra en la Capital del Mundo, porque Mineros de Parral les hará los honores nada menos que a los Rojos de Jiménez y al ex-minero Humberto Gutiérrez Valerio. El siempre esperado clásico del sur, tiene en el fenómeno “Beto Gutiérrez”, a un pretexto que seguramente abarrotará el graderío del Coloso de Los Linderos, con los aficionados viendo a su ex-ídolo con el odiado rival. Beto Gutiérrez logró con los Mineros sus seis últimos títulos en la historia en las campañas 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 y 2017, pero durante el beisbol de estufa de este 2019 fue cambiado a la VIII zona para defender los colores de la “Furia Roja”. Rojos y Mineros van a cerrar la campaña con seis partidos que lucen trepidantes, Jiménez (12-12) es quinto lugar de la tabla a un paso de la calificación, en cambio Mineros (9-15) es octavo sitio, posición que comparte con Soles de Ojinaga. Aunque en la lucha por la calificación, Mineros domina a Soles en la serie entre si, los pupilos de Jaime Quintana no pueden estar a expensas a ello, necesitar sumar el mayor número de victorias y aprovechar el que todavía la calificación está en sus manos. Por la rivalidad y todo lo demás, Rojos no va dejar pasar la oportunidad de eliminar a Mineros, lo cual sería un logró mayúsculo y una motivación extra para ir a los playoffs. Probables abridores Junio 12.- Martin Urías (0-4, 6.27 PCL) vs Javier Rodríguez (3-1, 3.57 PCL) Junio 13.- Alfonso Pulido (2-3, 7.28 PCL) vs Marvel Manríquez (1-2, 6.47 PCL) Junio 14.- Mario Rodríguez (2-0, 3.30 PCL) vs Alvaro Sandoval (2-3, 6.91 PCL) Hace un año Parral ganó la serie 3-0

Estrena Mazorqueros tercer manager Martin Villa no solo espera tener un debut triunfal, sino que está obligado a recuperar la confianza de los Mazorqueros de Camargo, cuando reciban desde mañana a los Soles de Ojinaga en serie donde ambos clubes están metidos de lleno en la pelea de la calificación. Villa, se convierte en el tercer manager de Mazorqueros en este 2019, luego que en la pasada serie la IX Zona fue barrido por los Algodoneros de Delicias, lo que le costó el trabajo a Beto Ortiz que había llegado en lugar de Victor Ledezma. Al perder los tres duelos en Delicias, Mazorqueros dejo números de 11-13 empatado en el sexto lugar por Dorados de Chihuahua, a dos juegos de ventaja de Soles y Mineros de Parral. Camargo necesita mínimo llevarse la serie porque al final va terminar en Madera, la plaza más difícil del estatal donde los Venados tiene 10 victorias a cambio de solo dos descalabros. Los “Lara Boys” (9-15) son el motivo que el estatal de al llegar la penúltima jornada la justa mantenga una gran expectación. “La idea es ir por la serie, sabemos que no será fácil porque Mazorqueros es un gran equipo, si sacamos un juego vamos a buscar la calificación en la última jornada en nuestra casa”, señaló Armando Lara manager fronterizo. Probables abridores Junio 12.- Saúl Vázquez (4-1, 2.60 PCL) vs Isaac Castro (2-4, 5.44 PCL Junio 13.- Aarón Aguilar (2-2, 5.40 PCL) vs Luis Rene Saenz (2-2, 4.25 PCL) Junio 14.- No definido vs José Angel Uzeta (0-1, 7.94 PCL) Hace un año Camargo ganó la serie 3-0.

(LEB prensa)

#estatal

[proautomxl-blog]

No nos creas, mejor ven a #ProAuto y comprueba las geniales condiciones de nuestros seminuevos ;)

Promocionar publicación

10 personas alcanzadas

Me gusta

Me gusta

Me encanta

Me divierte

Me asombra

Me entristece

Me enoja

Comentar

Compartir

ProAuto

Publicado por

Naira De Anda Tello

·

1 h

·

Es momento de que inicies tu independencia financiera... ¡Tenemos este #AutoIdeal para Uber!

http://proautonacionales.com/…/nissan-versa-advance-2013-b…/

Nissan Versa Advance 2013 Brownish

¡De los mas vendidos en 2016! Controles al volante de audio y crucero Vidrios eléctricos Seguros eléctricos 4 cilindros Transmisión automática de 5 velocidades Bolsas de aire al frentePROAUTONACIONALES.COM

Eliminar

Obtén más Me gusta, comentarios y contenido compartidoEsta publicación tiene un mejor rendimiento que el 90% de las publicaciones de tu página. Promociónala para obtener más resultados excelentes.Promocionar publicación

367 personas alcanzadas

Me gusta

Me gusta

Me encanta

Me divierte

Me asombra

Me entristece

Me enoja

Comentar

Compartir

13 veces compartido

Comentarios

Escribe un comentario...

Ver todas

Videos

chevron-down

¡Tenemos el auto que te late! Visíta nuestra página y encuentralo: www.proautonacionales.com

1

¿Qué te quieres regalar para esta navidad? ¡Tenemos #TuAutoIdeal!

2

No dejan de llegar novedades, ¡además de las que no alcanzamos ni a publicar! Llega a ProAuto por tu #SeMiNuevo

Ver todos

Fotos

chevron-down

Ver todas

Publicaciones

Ver más

Concesionaria en Mexicali

4.8

· Abierto ahoraConsejos para páginas

Ver todos

iconForTip

¿Tienes amigos a los que les puede gustar tu página?Invita a amigos a indicar que les gusta ProAuto para poder conectarte con más personas.

Ver todos los consejos para páginas

Índice de respuesta: 100%; tiempo de respuesta: 58 minutosResponde antes para activar la insignia 2.047 Me gusta +19 esta semanaJose M. Silva y 384 amigos más 2.044 seguidores Ver noticias de páginasPublicaciones de páginas que indicaste que te gustan en nombre de tu página Promociona tu publicación"Es momento..." está teniendo un rendimiento mejor que el 90% de tus publicaciones.… Invitar a amigos a que indiquen que les gusta la página

Sabemos que buscas formar un patrimonio por eso ofrecemos seminuevos nacionales e impecables en los mejores precios.

2.047 Me gusta

A

Jose M. Silva

y 384 amigos más les gusta esto

46 personas estuvieron aquí.Melba Tello y 2 amigos más

Información

Ver todo

Francisco L. Montejano y Mal Paso #2093 21040 Mexicali

2511325

Normalmente responde en una hora

Enviar un mensaje

Promocionar sitio web

http://proautonacionales.com/

Concesionaria

·

Negocio local

Hours (9:00 - 19:00)Abierto ahora

Próximos eventos

Ayuda a los demás a encontrar tu próximo evento. Créalo en Facebook.

Publicaciones de visitantes

Favio Gámez Terrazas2 de febrero a las 23:11busco traverse acadia su rango modelo 2011 2012 envía fotos y precios1 Me gusta2 comentariosYa no me gusta · Comentar

A las personas también les gusta

Automoviles 3AConcesionaria

H4tautoConcesionaria

Trade innSector automotor

Concesionarios automotores en Mexicali

Le gusta a esta página

Bazar nuevo mexicali1

Facultad de Arquitectura y Diseño UABC

UNEA

Español ·

Español (España)

·

English (US)

·

Português (Brasil)

·

Français (France)

Privacidad

·

Condiciones

·

Publicidad

·

Opciones de anuncios

·

Cookies

·

Más

Facebook © 2017Chatear con mis amigos

Patty Guillen

Juanito Lopez Perez

Edgar Alberto Israel Rivadeneira

Gonzalez Mario

Alex Rojas

Tomás Carrion

Victor Manuel Ayala Zavala

Jose Arnulfo Ponce Contreras

4 minNaira Golightly Morgendorffer

Pablo Sergio Rivera Chavez

Ernesto DE Los Higuera

Jose Murillo

Guadalupe Mercado

Brenda Pérez

Nacho Cruzaley

Orlando Teran

Ruben Espinoza Aguilar

Javier Valencia

Xavi Jimenez Jimenez

MÁS CONTACTOS (293)

Aaron Arpero

Abraham Diaz Guillen

Adolfo Garcia

Adrian Flores Lopez

Alan Alaniz Higuera

Alan Cornejo

Alan Garcia Gonzalez

Alan Salazar Torres

Albert May

Alberto Redona

Alberto Rodriguez Periodista

Alejandra De Lucas

Alejandra Rivera

Alejandro Reynozo

Alex Nedri

Alexandro Bermudez Leyva

Alfredo Chavez

Alfredo Perez Herrera

Americo Everardo Escobar Ramos

Ana Bon

Ana Lilia Rubio

Andree Nava

Andres Joanny Vargas Licea

Andres Machado

Andres Vargas

Angel Avila

Anna Victoria

Antonio De Jesus Cardenas

Antonio Santos

Antonio Yepiz

Aracely Jaimes

Armando Arvizu

Armando Perez Moon

Armando Walker

Artemiisa RF

Arturo Sifuentes

Arturo Yvidal

Ary CoVer

Autocubiertas de Mexico

Axis Jona

Beltrán Eri

Berenice Acosta

Bocho Juvenal Garcia Gomez

Brandon Cid

Carin Mena

Carlos Manuel

Carlos Montaño

Carlos Reyes

Carmen Carcamo

Celeste De Aguilar

Celia Garcia

Cesar Alejandro Lara Frias

Cesar O Rivera

Christian Cantu

Christian R Sierra

Cony Calderón

Cristhian Jovan Rodriguez

Cristian Alvarado

Cv Garza

Daniel Arteaga

Daniel F. Cabrera

Daniel Jasso

Daniel Mohedano

Daniel Rios

Danilo Carboni

Daniza Castro

Danny Mendoza Contreras

Dante ML

Diaz Jess

Diego Cisneros

E Va Mariana Malacon

Edgar Alegria

Edgar Banda

Edgar Esquerra

Edgar Gutierrez Sanchez

Edith Avendaño

Eduardo Bravo

Eduardo Vaca

Efrain Gonzalez

Efren Gonzalez

Efren Macias

Elia Esquivel Raya

Elizabeth López

Elliot Villegas

Elsa Isabel Jarillo

Emilio H. Longoria

Emmanuel Cruz'

Enrique Sanchez

Erendira Cortez

Erendira Herrera

Ernesto Daniel Huerta Negrete

Esteban Garcia

Ezekiel Chomina Gomez

Fabian Sarabia

Fabiola Bojorquez

Fabiola Limon

Felipe Rodriguez

Fernanda Alegria

Fernanda Ibarra

Fernanda Silva Marrón

Fernando Cervantes

Fernando Gomez

Fher Herrera

Florazteca Perez Coello

Francisco Israel Villegas Hernandez

Francisco Javier Garcia

Francisco Saavedra Corrales

Francisco Sanchez

Francisco Santillan

Francisco Serna

Fredy Sant

Frix Gutierrez

Gabriel Pikos

Gabriela Guadalupe Martinez Guell

German Armando Alvarado Lopez

German Gtz Ruiz

Glenda Roxana Casillas

Gloria Arellano

Gonzalez Isarael

Grupo AutoPasión

Grupo Garcia Montaño

Guillermo Diaz Valenzuela

Hemir Montaño

Hiram Aguiniga

Hiram Figueroa

Hirana Gutierrez Kurumiya

Irineo Solano Diaz

Isaac Lopez Landeros

Isaahck Matus

Isabel Garcia

Isac Parra

Isela Sañudo

Ishiro Yanajara

Isis Barbosa Limon

Itzel Escobar

Ivan Armando Ramirez Ramirez

Ivan Cota

Ivan Dueñas

JA QO

Jairo Amezola

Jairo Arredondo

Javier Flores

Javier Gutierrez

Jesse Lopez

Jessica Francisbel

Jesus Cruz

Jesus Guzman

JF LR

Jimmy Rivera

Joel Tarin

Jorge Eduardo Demara Hansmann

Jorge Gutierrez

Jorge Luis Aripez

Jorge Lujan Arana

Jorge Rosales

José Abraham Aguirre

Jose Acosta

José Alejandro García Salcido

José Angel Celis Guzmán

Jose Fraga

Jose Garcia

Jose Juan Ayala

Jose Juan Hernandez Garcia

Jose Molina

Jose Rivera

Jose Vasquez

Jrgsl Dn

Juan Alberto Zapien

Juan Enriquez

Juan Ilich

Justo Gonzalez

Karla Espinoza

Karla Mendoza Andrade

Karlaa Romoo

Karlita de Tuells

Kike Gonzalez

Kim Renteria

Kit Moncada

Konno Raztan

Laura Elizabeth Gutierrez Ramirez

LC Victoria Lizarraga

Leonardo Lopez

Lesley Garate

Letty Lizarraga

Lilia Catalina Bejarano Murrieta

Liz Mtz Vaca

Lizette Leon

Lola Hernández

Loly Pino Vzla

Lorenia Sandoval

Luis Alberto Larios

Luis Enryke Ochoa

Luis Fernando Mendivil

Luis Gallego

Luis Mario Verdugo Estrada

Lupillo Tapia Ortiz

Lupita Higuera

Maestro Eric HU

Maggy de la Vega

Mahr Huerta

Maliyani Viera

Mandito Navarro Zavala

Manny Carreño

Manuel Angulo

Manuel Palacios

Manuel Piña

Marcelo Zamora J

Marco Rascon

Marco Reyes

Maria Isabel Rodriguez

Maria Teresa Dozal Moreno

Maria Teresa Gonzalez Gomez

Maricarmen Ortiz Figueroa

Marıel Corona

Marisol Lara Legaspi

Martin Castro

Martin Robles Sierra

Mary Nena Aguilar Rdgz

Mayra Villalaz

Melina Fimbres Correa

Melissa Vega

Metzli Casillas

Miguel Angel Laija

Miguel Castro

Miguel L Burciaga

Miguel Tirado

Mike Martin

Miriam Martinez

Mirna Ortega

Miroslava Castro Vela

Mora Sotelo Carolina

Na Rodriguez Vega

Negro Hdez

Nestor Valenzuela Aguilar

Noe Gonzalez

Nomar Ramos Silva

Nutriclub Mago de Sánchez

Octavio Cruz Cruz

Ortiz Sanchez Estefani

Oscar Perez

Paola Lopez Sepulveda

Patricia Leyva

Patty Aviña Campos

Paty Ceballos

Paul Moreno

Pedro Ayon

Pedro Camacho O

Pedro Castillo Chavoya

Pedro Contreras

Perla Argil Mdl

Perla Elizabeth Ornelas Medina

Peter Castillo

Pino Sánchez Manuel

Priscila Liera

Rambo Enrique Oliveros Bravo

Ramiro Terrazas Peña

Ramon Gomez

Raul Eduardo Aldrete

Raul Fernández De Lara Ochoa

René Guillermo Jr.

Roberto Beltran

Roberto Jimenez

Roberto Lau

Roberto Nungaray Ochoa

Rodrigo Pinedo Chavez

Rodriguez Juan

Rosario Solorío

Rots Titii

Roxana Vazquez

Ruben Espinoza Quiñones

Ruben Torres

Rubí Rubí

Rudy Peligro

Ruth Eréndira

Sergio Huerta

Sergio Quintana

Shitto Quevedo Covarrubias

Simon Salamanca Cruz

Titino Sucursal

Tonny Helendrez Chruz

Tony Martinez

Tovilla David

Una Thal Gizelytha de Cruz

Veronica Meza

Veronica Rodriguez

Victor Miguel

Victor Ramirez

Yesenia Murataya

Yoban Ch

Yulianna Colio

Yuyith Cha

Zuñiga Nena

এলি মেংডোজ়া

[guadalajaradispensas]

matrimonios 1825 parte 3-2/2(film 168224)

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-6T9X-FT?i=625&wc=3J44-3TL%3A171935001%2C171974101%2C1085313802&cc=1874591&cat=29324

626 oah 2526 pt.6

627 168224

629 slate

630 continua

631 cresencio romero & rita ruelas / moyahua

636 manuel lopez & maria luquin / cocula

642 seferino diaz & refugia goznalez / colotlan

648 nicolas orozco & carmen lopez / arandas

653 manuel gutierrez & sostenes barajas / cuquio

658 victor gutierrez & quirina ponce / lagos

664 cristobal cardenas & antonia montano / huacalapa

671 pedro rodriguez & francisca valadez / adoves

677 ciriaco mesa & josefa chacon / guadalajara

682 antonio gutierrez & ygnacia angulo / arandas

688 rafael conrique & maria tomasa camarena / arandas

693 casimiro flores & maria jesus real / cocula

699 luis cuellar & manuela lopez / encarnacion

705 dimas robles & gertrudis serda / barca

708 hilario mesa & antonia rivera / jalpa

715 manuel ordorica & antonia robalcava / teocaltiche

721 luis martinez & antonia jimenez / guadalajara

727 agapito carrillo & maria lazara marin / teocaltiche

734 damasio apodaca & clara hildago / magdalena

743 vicente castellanos & antonia romero / guadalajara

750 ramon bendor & celedonia perez / zapotlan

755 teodoro santillan & brigida garcia / cuquio

763 lorenzo gonzalez & albina valdez / cocula

768 guillermo torres & maria onofre mayorga / colotlan

771 antonio victor orozco & barbara fletes / tuscacuesco

776 antonio aguinaga & petra castro / lagos

780 juan jose hernandez & juliana gonzalez / jalostotitlan

786 antonio espinosa & refugio garcia / zapotiltic

795 jose guadalupe avila & maria sotera gutierrez / san cristoval

806 francisco de anda & josefa ortega / valparaiso

820 gabriel trujillo & rosa medina / colima

824 luis bobadilla & maria de los angeles sousa / guadalajara

828 francisco padilla & simona ramirez / zapotlan

835 rafael enriquez & maxima becerra / jesus

840 jacinto lomelin & josefa aceves / atotonilco

845 nicolas reyes & maria jorge robalcava / teocaltiche

850 alejandro carrillo & polonia preciado / cocula

856 matias montano & dolores carrillo / ocotlan

860 casimiro gutierrez & rita garcia / arandas

864 rafael cerda & modesta gonzalez / ocotlan

867 santiago ruiz de villegas & maria rosario carrillo / zacatecas

871 teodor nino & trinidad esparza / zacatecas

875 hermenegildo santa cruz & julia perez / tepic

883 clemente gonzalez & guadalupe gonzalez / guadalajara

889 ramon robalcava & petra agredano / tepatitlan

895 lugardo ramirez & petra briseno / cuquio

900 nasario aramburo & victoria jauregui / mexticacan

910 trinidad estrada & edubije aceves / tepatitlan

916 rafael sanchez & gregoria esteves / guadalajara

922 yrenio valdez & maria de la luz salazar / jerez

928 albino herrera & margarita romero / ayo el chico

934 leocadio ramirez & tomasa bustamante / adoves

939 aniseto almauger & francisca guerra / jalpa

947 olayo cobarrubias & juana maria mora / atoyac

952 victoriano gomez & romualda lopez / tecolotlan

958 jose de la luz parada & eugracia gutierrez / lagos

961 ramon villasenor & gertrudis leon / autlan

966 gregorio ramirez & hilaria robles / juchipila

971 anacleto lopez & juana balbina robles / mezquitic

978 antonio alvarez & rosalia herrera / arandas

983 jose maria chavez & bonifacia velos / lagos

987 jose moreno hurtado & maria jesus guerra hurtado / adoves

992 jose torres & severa medina / aguascalientes

996 eleuterio troncoso & ygnacia troncoso / isla

1004 salome lozano & santos munoz / lagos

1010 pablo toscano & loreto ramirez / zapotlanejo

1018 estevan hernandez & ascencion perez / yahualica

1023 jose camacho & paula guerrero / cocula

1029 rafael hernandez & trinidad hernandez / arandas

1033 antonio soto & vicente marquez / ayo el chico

1037 jose maria de la torre & regina de la torre / tepatitlan

1043 juan maria alvorado & francisca garcia / san sebastian

1047 yrenio gudino & rosalia ruiz / mexicalingo

1050 rafael guerra & francisca carreon / encarnacion

1056 jose julio & maria magdalena / techaluta

1060 francisco jarba & cruz navarro / tepatitlan

1065 jose maria gonzalez & encarnacion fernandez / guadalajara

1073 maximo rabalero & francisca solano / tonala

1076 reimundo duarte & maria jorje garcia / huejuquilla

1082 tomas ramos & maria bacilia de la cruz / zapopan

1087 mariano ybarra & josefa gonzalez / etzatlan

1103 rafael encarnacion pelayo & gregoria naranjo / ayutla

1109 manuel navarro & antonia garcia / tepatitlan

1115 antonio ruano & gervacia gonzalez / yahualica

1120 mariano huelga & josefa perez / lagos

1126 juan nepomuceno romo & juana munoz / lagos

1132 antonio marin & bonifacia cruz / teocaltiche

1137 felipe jimenez &  juliana jimenez / lagos

1143 antonio armeria & fermina cerrato / guadalajara

1149 pedro roman & antonia alvarez / guadalajara

1153 fernando rodriguez & gregoria jesus herrera / aguascalientes

1157 bonifacio huerta & felipa mercado / cuquio

1163 juan jose bolanos & teodora ybarra / jesus

1167  jose maria fernandez & eulogia reyes / cuquio

1173 matias aguilera & eusevia de jesus gonzalez / barca

1176 francisco zuniga & jacinta magana / lagos

1182 rafael jimenez & eulogia garcia / mexticacan

1187 antonio jimenez & petra fernandez / jalostotitlan

1193 maximo renteria & vicenta camacho / jalostotitlan

1199 pedro jimenez & margarita jauregui / mexticacan

1205 antonio torres & josefa michel / purification

1212 joaquin mota & guadalupe hernandez / guadalajara

1216 ysidro quinones & andrea aguilar / guadalajara

1223 antonio flores & gregoria flores / ocotlan

1227 mariano cervantes negrete & guadalupe risco / guadalajara

1233  vicente barragan & manuela gomez / guadalajara

1239 apolonio lomeli & santos sepulveda / mexticacan

1247 continua

1248 oah  2526 fin

1249 end of roll

#1825