Oh no, he got hot!
3K notes
·
View notes
I was worried that nobody would follow Dracula Daily this year since it was so popular last year, but it seems like I’m not the only one who missed it the first time, and some people just want to reread it. Excited to participate this time.
963 notes
·
View notes
reading Dracula like this is so funny because it really frames the Renfield plot as the comedic relief B-plot
Jonathan is standing over the terrifying body of Dracula, shovel in hand, he puts all his might into striking Dracula but at the last second falters, leaving instead a deep cut in the forehead. There is no hope for him now.
SMASH CUT to Seward and Renfield, Renfield catches a giant fly, holds it for a few seconds and then swiftly eats it, Seward looks on in curious silence.
704 notes
·
View notes
it's kinda surprising that bram stoker didn't intend for his story to be read chronologically, because it works very well. Yes, the contrast between Jonathan's horror and Lucy's romcom is funny, but it also really emphasises how alone Jonathan is. You see him getting deeper and deeper into the horror, and you're told he can't tell anything to anyone, and then you cut to Lucy and Mina, whose biggest issue is Lucy and her three proposals, none of them worried in the slightest about Jonathan, because, why would they? They didn't receive any bad news.
Switching the pov shows us how Jonathan is all alone in this situation, and really makes it clear that if he was to die, no one would know the true reason.
673 notes
·
View notes
I love how the genre of Dracula keeps shifting between horror, rom-com, psychological thriller, or western depending on which character's pov we're reading.
447 notes
·
View notes
As the Dracula posting begins again I will remind the internet that Dracula is not written in chronological order and by doing this daily Dracula stuff you are, for better or worse or both at times, getting a different experience than the original novel with the suspense and buildup completely different than the book
Also I just. Recommend reading the book. It’s still a rlly good novel and you can see how the authors intended order of events. And. You don’t have to wait for months to read a new page. Nodnod
52 notes
·
View notes
For those who haven’t read the book in its original order: The story of the Demeter in the book starts after you know its ultimate fate. So it is a story where you already know the ending and are reading to see how the crew ended up in the state that they did.
Arguably Dracula Daily is providing a different experience by leaving it open ended, so we don’t know exactly what is going to happen to the crew. It adds to the mystery and horror of the whole journey.
246 notes
·
View notes
Obviously the dates are a disaster, but it's implied Renfield was in a straightjacket for at least one week?
13 notes
·
View notes
Mina would’ve loved Dracula Daily
113 notes
·
View notes
“call me Ishmael” I’ll call you late-with-your-weekly-update is what I’ll call you
45 notes
·
View notes
Alright small, not that important PSA since I keep seeing people say that Dracula is set in 1897: Books don’t have to/usually don’t take place when they were published.
The year is never stated in the text so short answer is we don’t necessarily know what year Dracula takes place, long answer is it’s probably 1893, longer answer is it’s more complicated than that, but either way it’s almost definitely not 1897
16 notes
·
View notes
shout-out to matt kirkland for dailying this dracula in a perfect curve of an emotional arc
66 notes
·
View notes
I need everyone reading Dracula for the first time via Dracula Daily to know that in the actual order of the book, today's newspaper clipping comes before the Log of the Demeter, and the first time I read it I was convinced that the corpse at the helm was our boy Jonathan
240 notes
·
View notes
So 100 page tabs wasn't enough for all the date changes in Dracula,
13 notes
·
View notes
“She doesn't know her mind a bit; she seems to see the storm coming, but can't decide whether to run up north in the open, or to put in here”
cant help but feel that that passage doesn’t just refer to the ship, but also how Mina’s is dealing with the realization that Jonathan might not come back (or, if he does, unrecognizable).
65 notes
·
View notes