Tumgik
#sonya is to rodya what rodya is to svidrigailov
sasperine · 2 months
Text
i love how the quote “your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing” is often cited as a sort of aphorism when in context it's just rodya hard projecting all his problems onto poor sonya. like please do not take any sort of advice from a man who unironically compares himself to napoleon. he is not qualified
35 notes · View notes
daydreaming-effy · 1 year
Text
Ranking Literature Boyfriends
Johnathan Harker- 11/10. Amazing. Wholesome. Flawless. Was willing to become a vampire to stay with his darling Mina.
Dimitry Razumikin- A good friend, respects women, caring and an all around good guy. What's not to love?
Quincey Morris- he's technically an ex, but genuinely loved Lucy, loved her enough to respect her choice and become friends with her fiancé and other ex. Bonus points for being a sexy cowboy.
Konstantin Levin- idk, he's just a sweetheart.
Fitzwilliam Darcy- sure he was a dick in the beginning, but who doesn't love a man who admits to his mistakes and actually changes?!
Rodya Raskolnikov- ok, so he killed a pawnbroker with an axe, but he really does love Sonya, helps her and her family, and embraces the positive influences she has on his life.
Alexei Vronsky- a romantic who makes poor life choices. Dude, you knew she was married, the mess is half your fault.
Victor Frankenstein- he clearly adored Elizabeth, but him being a deadbeat dad got her (and Justine, and his brother and his friend) killed.
Dorian Gray- he's hot af but destroys the life of everyone he comes in contact with (justice for Sybil Vane!)
The husband in The Yellow Wallpaper- useless and neglectful.
Arkady Svidrigailov- a creep who obviously didn't deserve Dunya.
Edward Rochester- he kept is wife in an attic. Need I say more? Sure, he fell in love with Jane, but that doesn't make up for LOCKING A WOMAN IN YOUR FUCKING ATTIC.
7 notes · View notes
sayorkunau · 6 years
Text
Okay after re-reading Crime and Punishment I have to make a revision.
Between the two I think The Idiot is a far more rewarding and active read, while C&P is still by far a more interesting story.
I mean to lay it out the entirety of The Idiot is a fucking shamble of a family and their friends gossiping about each other. It’s basically a reality tv show where everyone is trash and they right with the neighbors with a brutal murder at the end. It’s a train wreck the entire time and it sucks you in. By the middle of the book you want a consumptive kid on his death bed and his friends to die along with the nosey mom and bitch of a sister. It’s good shit. The thing is you don’t really understand what the book is doing to you until after the fact. You’re so intent on the story it’s not until you put it down that you realize: I want a dying kid to die already and that’s exactly what Dostoevsky wants you to feel.
Whereas C&P makes you stop mid story multiple times to ask yourself if anyone really should be able to take the law into their own hands. It’s definitely a more philosophical read. But the thing about C&P is that it starts off with the murder and there’s just so much suffering and police evasion and then Svidrigailov just fucking storms in like the fucker he is and Rodya is still in his rags suffering while they all yell about an old lady who conned a shit ton of money from poor people. I mean the bitch is basically stealing herself. The only true moral person is Sonya who has to proposition herself to feed her family. Everyone else has a vice that fucks them over.
Anyway. If you want to actually read Dostoevsky start with The Idiot. The words themselves are easier to read than Crime and Punishment. But Crime and Punishment is just god damn good.
2 notes · View notes