Tumgik
#boys will be held accountable
Text
I pledge allegiance to the fact that “boys will be boys” is not an excuse to be violent or verbally abusive. If a teacher says that this behavior is acceptable because a boy has a crush one me instead of calling his parents, then that teacher should be reported for conditioning young girls to correlate love with abuse.
Accountability and justice for all
Credit: jax on instagram
2 notes · View notes
edenfenixblogs · 3 months
Note
hi, i wanted to give you an update on that post of mine you reblogged. heritageposts has informed me that they were using the red triangle in this context: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231123-one-small-red-triangle-palestine-we-are-finally-looking/
i was wrong about what they meant with the 🔻 emoji and i am officially rescinding my previous statement
I am all for fact checking and I would love to believe that Heritage Posts did not mean this particular horrible thing they did.
However, Middle East Monitor (MEMO) is not a reliable source for information in this conflict. If HP is actually using MEMO for news, they should focus on more reliable ones going forward.
There are plenty of other left-leaning sources with more reliability, credibility, sourcing, and transparency.
They have failed several fact checks for misleading and occasionally false information. The publication is explicitly and repeatedly pro-Hamas, and they often omit vital information to skew their stories.
While they are not rated as an outright propaganda publication or as a source of conspiracy theories, they do often cite sources which do and are.
Finally, they are funded by donations. Of course these donations largely come from people who support the kind of reporting that people who donate to them support. They are a nonprofit organization, which is not inherently a bad thing. But this means their interests are not based in journalistic ideals but in political ideology. This is not a reason to completely discount a source, but it is something to keep in mind.
In general, with a topic this intense and with such profound consequences for so many people, I’m only engaging with sources who receive a “reporting” rating of “high” or better and a “credibility” rating of “high credibility.”
I would POSSIBLY consider a “reporting” rating of “Mostly factual” if it had a “high credibility” rating and several extenuating circumstances and reduced media bias to compensate for its lower score in another area.
Leftist sources worth referencing instead:
Forward Progressives
Haaretz
International Policy Digest
Current Affairs
And many others
Personally, though, (for this particular conflict especially) I tend to prefer sources that fall into the central three categories: left-center biased, least biased, and right-center biased.
No news source is perfect or without bias. But this conflict is so fraught that I frankly don’t trust anyone reporting with extreme ideological intentions. And I also don’t want to only read sources that make me comfortable. I am personally very leftist in all of my personal politics and voting. However, I also know that the far left has been more hostile to me based solely on my Jewish ethnicity than anyone else in these past months. Furthermore, I think politicians should be more left, but journalism should always prioritize facts and a full scope of a situation over any one viewpoint. I am the daughter of a journalist. I am deeply in favor of journalistic freedom. And I absolutely do NOT believe in “both sidesism.” Sometimes, there really aren’t two sides to a situation that are both equally worth listening to. There is no alternative viewpoint to “Black Lives Matter” for example that is not deeply racist.
There are not “two sides worth teaching” when it comes to The Holocaust.
But the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not so simple. Israel should stop its bombing of Palestine. Palestinians should have full and equal rights. Jewish people in Israel and around the world should not have to live in constant fear or attack, harassment, or murder. There are a lot of extremely valid perspectives from Palestinians, Muslims, Israelis, Arabs, and Jews. And right now, the far left and the far right are weaponizing their ideologies to reduce all of the aforementioned groups to their worst actors. That is not something that will help anyone with regard to this conflict.
Left Leaning Sources
ABC News
Associated Press
Atlantic Media
Boston Globe
The Forward (This is a Jewish source. They had one failed fact check in the last five years, but issued an official correction.)
Human Rights Watch
Institute for Middle East Understanding (This is a Palestinian source and it has a completely clean fact check record)
Least Biased Sources
Jewish Telegraphic Agency (Obviously a Jewish source)
Reuters (this has a Very High reporting rating)
American Press Institute (not only have they not failed a fact check in five years; they have never failed a fact check ever)
The Conversation
Pew Research
Foreign Policy
Foreign Affairs
Sky News UK
Right Leaning
Note: As I stated numerous times, including in this post, I am a leftist. However, something important for American readers of this post to know is that, when it comes specifically to matters involving military analysis of foreign conflicts, a slight right lean in perspective is common and sometimes preferable to leftist idealism. I say this as someone who votes and holds opinions that are about as far left as one can get. However, I also say this as someone with a background in university studies of international politics. Because analysis of military conflicts is often done by those with experience in and understanding of the military, most of the most credible and detailed analyses of foreign military affairs do tend to be more right leaning than sources of equal worth focused on domestic political matters. Furthermore, a leftist tendency toward pacifism (which I share) tends to mean less leftist involvement in military-involved political matters at all. Of course, none of this means there are no quality leftist sources on the current conflict (which I obviously demonstrated by linking to such sources above). I am simply explaining the value of such sources to those who may justifiably be skeptical of anything right-leaning after the hellish past two decades of domestic policies and US-caused violence in other countries.
Note 2: There are plenty of right-leaning sources that received “high” credibility ratings and “high” reporting ratings. I found no sources that had both “very high” credibility and “high” reporting ratings in the “right-center” category.
Boston Herald
Chicago Tribune
Counter Extremism Project
Foreign Policy Research Institute
The Jewish Press (clearly a Jewish source, this publication is geared toward the Modern Orthodox Jewish community. They have no failed fact checks)
ITV News
Jewish Unpacked (this source has no failed fact checks. this source is right-leaning by necessity because of its historical examination of antisemitism in leftist spaces making those spaces inherently unsafe for Jews—not specifically in this most recent flare up in the I/p conflict, but for years).
Right Bias
Note: I don’t personally follow or read any of these sources. But I did list leftist sources with high credibility and reporting ratings, so I will do the same here in the interest of fairness. It should be noted that all other source bias ratings had results several pages long. Right Bias sources with high credibility and reporting ratings were confined to one page only. There are no Right Bias Sources with Very High reporting ratings and high credibility.
Economic Policy Journal (no failed fact checks now or ever)
Influence Watch (tends to view liberal and progressive politics as “extremist,” but has no failed fact checks.)
I am not inclined to trust HP simply because their most recent antisemitic behavior fell short of hoping for Jewish genocide. I have a higher bar for accounts than that.
164 notes · View notes
hella1975 · 1 year
Text
it's been pointed out on here before that a lot of terf arguments are actually rooted in sexist idealology that feminists fought and died to unnormalise decades ago and that's its own kettle of fish but one thing i also find very frustrating about this so called 'radical' feminism is that it's so... defeatist? like the moment you categorically label an entire section of society as Bad and Inherently Evil then there's also the implication that nothing can be done about it, and it completely takes all accountability away. saying all men are evil is just another way of saying boys will be boys. he raped her because he's a man. he hit her because he's a man. he didn't listen because he's a man - it's almost offensively oversimplified. there's no point trying to fix this issue in society because men are just Like That, okay! so now what? it's not like they're going anywhere, so you just accept that 50% of the population are evil and will forever treat you terribly and there's nothing to be done about it bc they're biologically predisposed to it? like is that fr the argument here? you're soooo radical for that
#this is coming from someone who used to very genuinely be a misandrist#ironically it was only when i started actually analysing my own feminism that i got MORE confrontational with men#and started respecting my boundaries a lot better BECAUSE i started holding them accountable again#like when men treat me like shit nowadays i dont just write it off as 'what did you expect? he's a man' i get MAD about it#because i EXPECT BETTER FROM THEM even if it's just tiny shit women have to deal with daily#i hold them to just as high a standard as im held to and i make them take accountability when they dont meet that#and whether you realise it or not even on a subconscious level the MOMENT you black-and-white blanket statement all men as bad#you stop holding them accountable.#like it is literally just boys will be boys. do terfs seriously not realise they're sending feminism BACKWARDS#like if a girl came to me with her trauma and people - other girls no less - tried to comfort her with 'yeah all men are evil'#id be fucking furious. like no he did that because he was a piece of shit that had it normalised to him that women arent to be respected#dont you dare let him off the hook with something as simple and uncritical as 'he's a man'#i promise you men like that will MUCH prefer a blanket statement such as 'all men are as bad as each other'#than actually being point blank told they're an abuser or a rapist. because being lumped together is comfortable and even empowering#wheras isolating their behaviour with words that are Bad and Ugly (LIKE 'rapist') is not comfortable at all and has heavy connotations#idk i dont think radical feminism is always bad on its own it can be v liberating. just terfs and misandrists that i have a problem with#dropping this post in a piranha tank and closing tumblr knowing im gonna have some thirty year old karen yelling at me within 5 mins#i probably wont respond to any terf comments bc they literally mentally exhaust me with their stupidity#but that also depends on my mood and ability to keep my mouth shut LMFAO we shall see
527 notes · View notes
literaryspinster · 9 months
Text
I don’t know who needs to hear this but
Sky dying was Viktor’s fault and him covering it up was bad actually.
149 notes · View notes
daily-hanamura · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
66 notes · View notes
thegroundhogdidit · 5 months
Text
oh when people said that ed is babygirl they really meant it in the "he's hot so all his crimes are okay" way actually. and i agree regularly like i can forgive the murder but maybe we should talk about the domestic abuse here like. he tried to make his most loyal follower and lover commit murder-suicide. hey no wait can we talk about this? murdering nameless extras is one thing but that's your husband? come back i'm serious trying to justify it with "izzy deserved it" is fucked up and cruel actually?? is that what you tell your friend whose husband hits her??? i don't think ed is irredeemable and he shouldn't be because it's ofmd but it wasn't really handled thoughtfully i don't think??
24 notes · View notes
mo-ok · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
family sentai big brothers - an observation
19 notes · View notes
deadbeatdadjokes · 2 years
Text
Thinking eternally about how most of Lancer’s interactions/relationships with the people in his life require him to excavate fondness himself because they’ll do things for him that would insinuate affection but it’s usually heaped on by a copious layer of “It’s not cause I actually LIKE YOU OR AnyThing hope you die but u better not :((” 
Spade (on his good days), Rouxls, even Susie in the beginning, all of them on this spectrum range messily from feeling as though taking care of him is a genuine burden to pretending they’re too cool to acknowledge their attachment altogether so even if they love him it is a fuckin MESS they’ve left him to sort through and draw his own conclusions. 
So when Queen knows him for all of like 3 hours and immediately adopts him/starts looking after him he’s probably wildly confused and maybe a little suspicious bc he hasn’t done anything to ‘earn’ it yet. 
Not really trying to make a significant statement here so much as I am pointing out the comedy (and the inherent tragedy) that comes with all the important people in Lancer’s life fighting over wall space to lean against and go ‘tch’ at him as he walks by bc that trope is usually more effective if he at least already has ONE person in his life (THAT IS AN ADULT SORRY SUSIE) to take responsibility for him willingly and gladly.  
99 notes · View notes
fanatics4l · 2 years
Text
sometimes i feel like this fandom forgets that steve publicly humiliated nancy and called her a slut, which was also spray painted for the whole town to see. steve did so much fucked up shit in s1. "steve apologized right after" okay and? he humiliated and degraded his girlfriend in front of his friends and for anyone else to see. personally, a simple apology isn't enough to fix that. that shit is so fucking invalidating for a woman and it honestly makes me so mad that nancy even got back with him after how he acted over an assumption. very very misogynistic of him too. also the way he talked down at her? hmmm but yea of course he's a fan fav now so whatever 😊 he's definitely grown and has matured but if this fandom is gonna hold billy accountable for the things he did to this day, then keep the same energy for steve
74 notes · View notes
autismjpg · 9 months
Text
also L to justin but in MY mind the boys are actually silly friends who enjoy each others company and i think taako WOULD disclose his hot date with death to them even tho merle would try to beat him with his wooden arm over it (lovingly)
11 notes · View notes
mephestopheles · 2 months
Text
I finally caught up with WBN, and oh dear gods I am so scared for them. I also have thoughts, because this whole episode felt like a giant panic attack going in two directions. This got long.
Ame can't pinpoint the moment she decides she needs to go, but I feel like it's that moment after you've realised you've partied too long and it's getting late. Like you need to go home and you're already in trouble and you know you can't fix it, but you still need to go like an hour ago. If only you could like reverse time long enough to make that decision at the moment you should have.
But it's not a conscious decision, so it's a nascent panic. That Fox is going to feel, and is going to interpret that as feeling trapped. So it ends up, at least how I'm seeing it as a feedback loop. Ame's not aware she's pushing those feelings aside, it's been fed to Fox and Fox is feeding back feeling trapped and claustrophobic and needing to run. And since it's all under the surface, it's hard to articulate, other than I need to go.
Because let's face it. These three need to have a nice long conversation about this internal shit and kind of explain how things are processing, but at the moment it's literally a "gotta go now, can't talk, words too slow"
And poor Suvi, who, like Brennan said in the fireside, has been taught from every single adult in her life that obedience is love, doing hard work you're not really into is how I show my appreciation and love, has also just walked out of her mom's place fully intending to go with Ame. It's not until that order from Steel that she stops moving because at that point, that it hits her how devastating that decision is and how in this moment she cannot cross this line. This line is too far, this line may not be the manifestation of throwing her family away but it feels like that. Decades of being the good and obedient child, the one who follows the rules to the letter all the time, every time is going up against a very new and burgeoning rebellion and possibly a search for autonomy, but I'm not willing to put words in Suvi's mouth just yet.
But I do know the feeling of panic that happens when you've always been the one who listened and followed the rules and stepping out of line here and now (I'm not ignoring the first chapter, but the first chapter was Suvi truly believing she was heading in the right direction and being stealth for safety's sake, and even the running after Ame was more a panic impulse decision) this decision here to leave her mom's place and then ignore her order is so much deeper, so much more than just "oh I need to protect my friends".
Prior to this, and even here, had Ame or Eursulon been in true danger she would have thrown hands. This is her home and even with the weirdass situation of the imperium dragging folks from their homes, Suvi knows she's safe and by extension believes both Ame and Eursulon are safe as well. So she's not sensing any of the danger that Ame is feeling, so she's not going to go against her mom. I'm assuming this is one of those "well shit, but mom probably has more Intel and that will help and if we can't get to Toma because it's super unsafe then at least we'll go to the north pole".
But unfortunately for all of them, Ame's panic is playing that weird like 5th dimensional time travelling chess with both the Fox's need for freedom, and who knows how much inherent magic and history she has just inherited as the opponent.
Maybe Suvi is right and the most they'll be delayed is 45 minutes and off they go. And maybe whatever panic is driving Ame is correct and if she doesn't get home to Toma to claim that space, the council will have an easier time destroying her. We don't know, and likely won't know even next week if this was a terrible decision or not.
Nobody is at fault, and yet they all bear some responsibility for how this happened. They're doing exactly what they feel is necessary in the situation and yes communication would help, but it cannot solve this. This is two fundamental forces that don't oppose each other but do have wildly different origins butting heads for real. Witches are wisdom based and emotional and social and have a lot of we do this because we have to take into consideration that we are important but also guests in a world built by spirits. And wizards are intelligence, and taxonomy, and strategies, and if I can get enough information I will understand this problem and find a solution.
Eursulon, is caught in the middle, but also can see that if it weren't for Suvi and by extension Steel, his life in the Citadel would be very different. So given his history with how quickly safe cities and towns turn hostile, if a witch says run, he's going to run.
I'm so happy that the dice wanted to tell a specific story and Eursulon was able to save those wizards and see all of the paths. I can't wait to see what he decides to do.
I am also devastated at the fracture that has appeared in Ame and Suvi's friendship and I'm hoping that they are able to find the path to healing. I trust the narrative and I super trust all the players, they definitely know what they're doing. I've been watching the actual plays long enough to trust that process. But until then I'm going to cry for them and gnaw on furniture until the next episode.
And the Fox is an innocent boy who added 2+4 and somehow divided by 0 to get explosion.
5 notes · View notes
nicxxx5 · 1 year
Text
we know jonathan taking a picture of nancy without her consent was bad, that’s undeniable. but can we recognize that he was like what 15? he was young and it was a mistake and he did it without thinking. again it was bad but i don’t think it justifies how much so many people villainize him. 
he’s done so much to help out everyone beyond that. he looks out for will and nancy so fucking much. i just don’t feel like he deserves to be made out to be such a horrible character because of something he did that he has clearly grown from. 
41 notes · View notes
muirneach · 3 months
Text
thousand yard stare. i didnt know ppl were making rpf with the guys from joker out
4 notes · View notes
smallhatlogan · 6 months
Text
not to say racism played no part in his decision–Homelander is a superpowered cop and trump allegory who dated a nazi, after all–but he knew exactly what was going on and what he was supposed to do, but he agreed with Cate and Sam's actions because he too believes supes are superior to regular people. He didn't just fly onto the scene and assume Marie&co were the attackers, he was told what to do and who to kill/subdue, went "No I'm doing it my way" realizing that Vought will have no choice but to shift the narrative to justify his actions.
6 notes · View notes
monstermoviedean · 2 years
Text
three things you need to know about dean winchester. 1) raised from age 4 to protect his little brother at all costs. 2) told at age 27 he might have to kill his little brother to protect him. 3) sacrificed his life to bring his little brother back from the dead.
63 notes · View notes
coolcarabiner · 1 year
Text
listening to certain lines off So Much (for) Stardust like
Tumblr media
12 notes · View notes