Tumgik
#im collecting data
groovyace · 6 months
Text
Keep seeing posts about sleeveless turtleneck crowley this, backless turtleneck crowley that. Are bits of it just gonna keep fucking dissapearing till hes wearing one of those like fake decoy turtlenecks where its only the top bit and nothing else??
When does this end?????
25 notes · View notes
moonsong4u · 1 year
Text
how sexy is mercymorn on a scale of 1-10
6 notes · View notes
cringefaildiaz · 2 months
Text
alrighty folks i've been ignoring a lot of the interviews in an attempt to stave off the delulu but have seen SO many takes on my dash, what's the consensus
81 notes · View notes
synthesizerfaggot · 6 months
Text
73 notes · View notes
meteorherd · 16 days
Text
MY THESIS PROPOSAL GOT APPROVEDDDDD
46 notes · View notes
irradiatedsnakes · 3 months
Text
your cool TA who plays undertale/pokemon/outer wilds music and also occasionally mechs albums during lab
36 notes · View notes
whatbigteeth · 1 year
Text
146 notes · View notes
biblicalhorror · 3 months
Text
So I just looked into that top 50 celebrities list put out by myclimate.org and they say that they "only use data that celebrities themselves publish," meaning that someone being tagged in a post in one area of the world and then the next day posting in another area is how they calculate mileage and emissions. It seems like a pretty glaring data flaw when Taylor obviously isn't going around posting her location or having people tag her in things most of the time, idk. I agree that there's a lot of undue focus being put on Taylor, specifically, when clearly it's a more widespread celebrity problem, but it feels like misinformation to me to be using that study as a gotcha.
19 notes · View notes
hyp3rfixation-h3ll · 6 months
Text
okay so i REALLY like making polls , and i'm fixated on sonic & sonic.exe related stuff right now , so i'm curious and I wanna collect data on one of my favouritest topics
Tumblr media
*( by sonic.exe , i'm referring to all of the media surrounding it , not JUST the creepypasta . like the exe ocs people make, the funkin' mods , etc etc ! )
as always , please reblog 4 a larger sample size and feel free to elaborate in the tags ! :D
22 notes · View notes
ordinary-clefairy · 7 months
Text
I apologize to my singular follower (who is a bot) for the amount of bubbline I’m reblogging, I’ve gone a little bit feral
25 notes · View notes
detectivehole · 4 months
Text
i absolutely love playing with the data visualizations on citizen dj and creating what is to other people apparently auditory sensory hell but to me is the correct amount of noise anything should make. please try it
13 notes · View notes
tangledinink · 1 year
Text
67 notes · View notes
mueritos · 1 year
Text
received approval for my research into trans sex ed, just have to make very minor edits, but a comment from someone on the board was thinking about changing the title since I used the word “transsexual” in it. They said it could continue the same pathologization I seek to counter in my research.
I’m a bit troubled. I chose this word with intention as reclamation of the word has largely been because of how “dirty” it has become from decades of cis people using that term for us. The board member said using “transgender” would be better to not alienate people, but the term “transgender” was made with the intention to be a more respectable term than “transsexual”. Words can be inherently alienating, and even words based out of a need for inclusion can have their own connotations attached to them that reveal even more barriers. 
I chose transsexual for my title because while my research aims to include trans people who have not or chose not to transitioned, I believe the way I’ve seen “transsexual” being reclaimed now is by countering the idea of a linear transition. I believe anyone can call themselves a transsexual, because no single trans persons view of a transition is the same. Some of us are done at social transitions, some of us are not. Further, I know the word is used by older trans people as it is a term they are more comfortable with, but also I wanted to examine through the use of transsexual just how and what we medicalize about our transitions. Are pap smears, birth control, and access to HIV medication not as important to the transitioning journey as HRT and surgery?
Still, I want to examine if this word can truly be alienating, or at the least if we are not at a place where seeing a title like “Transsexual Sex Ed” incites the idea that the guide is only for medically transitioned trans people. I would love to know if non transitioned trans people feel alienated or included with the word “transsexual”, or do you not care? Would you feel alienated with the term being used within a research study, even if the study seeks to aim non transitioned trans people within the project?
These are all questions I’m thinking about since receiving this comment. I chose this word with intention and with the understanding that it carries a large weight, and Im not sure how I feel getting this comment from someone who is not trans. It is understandable, but I still feel troubled overall by the problem it poses. I also know this is ultimately my decision to change the title, and it being intentionally controversial was my intention as well. 
Let me know what yall think if yall have any thoughts!
137 notes · View notes
optimalmongoose4 · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
With your help we can get those numbers up 🫡
14 notes · View notes
meteorherd · 6 months
Text
mentioning the word thesis made me think about my own social psychology thesis ANYWAYS i'm like actually settled on a thesis now i'm investigating how intergenerational conflict and cultural assimilation affect asian american relationships with mental health care. if you wanna get really technical and stuff, i'm using present and future orientation of consequences as a cultural moderating factor but i am too tired to explain all of that right now it's just gonna be really cool trust me ok????
Tumblr media
21 notes · View notes
whynotimtired · 2 years
Text
"And if they find the boy?"
"That's not going to happen."
We as a society don't talk about the fact that Brenner and the scientists KNEW Will. I get that you could maybe chalk it up to them just covering up his death and where he is cause it'll get them in trouble, but they KNEW him. They knew him well enough to make a replica of his dead body so lifelike that nobody but Joyce could even tell the difference. They talk about Will the same exact way they talk about El. That's not a coincidence.
"And the girl?"
"She can't have gone far."
260 notes · View notes