Tumgik
#the devourers
kwc-reads · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
birthday book haul!
which of these should I read first?
291 notes · View notes
literary-illuminati · 4 months
Text
2024 Book Review #9 – The Devourers by Indra Das
Tumblr media
I was recommended this as an example of a contemporary work where werewolves are actually treated as monstrous and horrifying instead of either romance fodder or one interchangeable variety of supernatural in an urban fantasy kitchen sink. In one sense that was a blatant lie (the monsters are only werewolves in the vaguest sense), but in another one I care about much more it fit the bill perfectly. Funnily enough it basically is a romance (or at least, the overarching framing narrative is), but for once I’m not complaining about that. Excellent read, though does require a bit of a strong stomach.
The framing narrative follows Alok, a history professor in Kolkata whose approached by a mysterious stranger at a festival. The stranger identifies himself as a half-werewolf, an immortal man-eating shapechanger. In between being mysterious and menacing and flirting with Alok, he hires him to transcribe and digitize two historical werewolf manuscripts – journals etched into parchment made from human skin. Those journals are the meat of the narrative, and it rapidly becomes clear they are written by the stranger’s parents; first the ancient norse werewolf who had wandered all the way to the banks of the Yamuna, then the human woman he fell into something like love with and raped as she travels alongside one of his former packmates and hunts him down.
The framing device is the emotional heart of this, and incredibly well interwoven with the manuscript sections. It’s fundamentally a romance, though one somewhat interestingly devoid of real conflict or plot (well, from Alok’s perspective. There’s a whole emotional journey with him going from ‘future food’ to ‘romantic partner’, he just only gets small glimpses of it). There’s I think one real argument or point of conflict between the two of them across the entire book? And maybe one or two points besides that where Alok or their relationship encounters genuine difficulty or danger. Despite that, and despite (or perhaps because of) the ambiguous ending, it all just very much worked for me.
It’s also interesting – and the book does really call this out – that the whole plot is essentially arbitrary. The inciting incident is just a werewolf being angsty and lonesome, and the entire story and all its stakes are strictly interpersonal with nary an epochal revelation or looming existential doom to be seen. It is a sign of how much of my reading diet is genre fiction that this felt like a massive breath of fresh air, I think.
Speaking of love – the book is deeply and intensely preoccupied with the closeness of and overlaps between love and sex and pain and violation and consumption and death. Werewolves consume souls and memories as well as flesh, knowing and even becoming (for a time) those they hunt. This extends to each other as well – regeneration means mating and fighting to the death is an impossibly thin an frequently crossed line, and intimacy and memories are shared by literally allowing someone to take a bit out of you. Izrail kills and consumes both his mother and his father, and this is the only way he ever truly knows either of them. Both he and his father have fallen in love with whole strings of humans across the ages, and each been the ruin of all but one of them. This extends into the use of language as well – I didn’t take notes as I read, but the example that sticks in my mind was the description of one werewolf pressing a mush of chewed flesh into the mouth of another so he might heal as being ‘like a gentle kiss’.
It is just an intensely gory book in general, really. Or not even gory so much as carnal, in the older broader sense. There’s blood and viscera and sweat and sex and piss and shit and tallow made from human fat and game animals eaten bloody and raw. All of it seamlessly intermixed in one richly detailed and incredibly pungent sensory world the book conjures up for you.. This is taken to an extreme whenever the primordial god-monsters that are a shapeshifter’s second soul appears on screen, but even beyond that – like when I say you need a bit of strong stomach to enjoy the book, I really don’t’ just mean in terms of violence.
This ties in a bit with the lack of grand, world-shaking stakes I mentioned but – the book makes excellent use of its period piece sections to really sell this feeling of the weight of history and of being caught up in the wake of events larger than you can perceive. The 17th century sections really nail the sense of the past as its own living, breathing world full of richness and contradictions, rather than just a slate for the present’s psychodrama. Also it’s possibly the first book I’ve ever read which really mentioned the surprisingly widespread and violent history of werewolf hunts in Europe, which I appreciated.
The shapeshifters (werewolves, rakshassa, djinn, ghuls) themselves are absolutely great. Horrifying and disgusting and sublime, with exactly as much detail given as the story needs without succumbing to rpg splatbook syndrome. The idea of werewolves as things which are deliberately created through a(n incredibly violent and traumatizing) ritual process is one I don’t think I’ve seen before? It works here, anyway – though instead of a hereditary curse or contagious infection, it leaves shapeshifters feeling like one of those elite, elevated fraternities who put new inductees through a hell of physical, social and sexual violence for hazing and indoctrination purposes (the usual modern versions being military units, sports teams, and just actual fraternities). Which ties into all those themes of the fine line between love and violence, I suppose.
Or well, not technically fraternity – werewolves are all functionally genderfuild (can take a big nap and wake up looking like whoever they ate last) and while their second selves can fuck I’m not sure either human genders or, like, genital arrangements apply to them. But 3/4 of the werewolves who get any lines are one caricature or another of masculinity and this absolutely informs how the condition and culture are presented. So like, I’ll just go with it.
Anyway, great book! And ‘abuse regeneration by sewing dozens upon dozens of bones and trophies taken from prey into your skin’ is a great look for a werewolf’s human form.
70 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
The Devourers by Indra Das is a richly written, artistic fantasy telling the story of shapeshifters who have lived in India since the Taj Mahal was first being built. A young professor named Alok meets a mysterious stranger who insists he's half-werewolf. He asks the professor to type up two manuscripts for him—manuscripts that tell the story of a human woman named Syrah who lived 200 years before them, a woman who became the object of a shapeshifter's deadly desire.
It's a book about greed, about a relentless, single-minded desire to violate and conquer. It is slow-paced yet difficult to put down, a slowly unspooling mystery, a mythological story that feels epic, historical, bloody, visceral. It's impressively new and feels very grounded in a sense of its own ancient folklore. It reminded me of NK Jemisin's talent for carving a world that feels convincingly, terrifyingly real and old.
I will mirror some reviewers' thoughts that at times the descriptions of bodily fluids could be a bit much. The amount of "piss" I understood, they're animals, there's a certain marking of territory. But there was so much of it. Part of me also wondered how necessary Fenrir's part to the book really was. The narrative picks up tremendous momentum once we begin Syrah's story, and I struggled to get a sense of what Fenrir really wanted. I almost wonder if it would have been better for us to get his journals within her portion of the narrative.
Still, I've been wanting to read this book for a long time, and wasn't disappointed. The explorations of trust, sex/physicality, gendered violence, and queerness, alongside an interpretation of werewolf as a being with two selves, two skins, was fascinating. I really enjoyed this read despite its difficult topics, and am so glad to have finally gotten to it.
Heavy content warnings for sexual assault, body horror. Also for homophobia, violence, physical abuse.
22 notes · View notes
Text
it’s really hard to describe plot points in the devourers to someone without making the book sound completely off the rails. which to be fair it is. like. he eats both of his parents. BUT I PROMISE IT MAKES SENSE THEMATICALLY IN THE STORY!!!!!!
19 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
10 notes · View notes
st-just · 5 months
Note
> when's the last time you saw werewolves played straight as actually horrifying? Or even the primary/load-bearing supernatural element of something?
you should read The Devourers by Indra Das. first of all it is the above and second of all I actually just think you would like it
At a glance looks pretty interesting! Will toss on the TBR, thanks.
15 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
vote yes if you have finished the entire book.
vote no if you have not finished the entire book.
(faq · submit a book)
7 notes · View notes
paxtara · 2 months
Text
Here's a little re-orchestrated medley of some of the Sally Face OSTs! We have Empty Hallways, the Main Title, The Calm, and Home. All were written by Steve Gabry, but I gave them a personal spin in my own style.
4 notes · View notes
foxglovedforest · 2 months
Text
The Devourers blew my tits clean off. If you even care.
4 notes · View notes
konboyblues · 25 days
Text
the best werewolf novel i ever did read was ‘the devourer’ by indra das, so it’s always difficult for me to open the horror version of chicklit werewolf fiction bc i got spoiled by das. but ngl… im happy rory’s transformation didn’t start off with an actual or metaphorical rape. she was just at the wrong place and the wrong time. imagine catching werewolf disease bc you thought you hit a deer, got out the car cuz u felt bad, but then became a werewolf’s dinner bc you interrupted their feeding time 😭
2 notes · View notes
pesbianlanic · 1 year
Text
may 2023 reading
books in bold are especially recommended!
Bad Gays: A Homosexual History by Huw Lemmey & Ben Miller - 4/5. when they say bad, they mean bad. a fascinating analysis of some queer collaborators in/perpetrators of violence, colonialism, imperialism, and fascism.
The Devourers by Indra Das - 5/5. this book is chilling, visceral, consuming, enchanting, intoxicating. i have never read anything like it before, and i’m so glad that i read it.
Wilder Girls by Rory Power - 3/5. i enjoyed reading this, but i also think this book had a lot of wasted potential. there were elements (survival, body horror, queer romance) that didn’t feel fully fleshed out.
Selected Poems of Emily Dickinson, Fall River Press leatherbound edition - 2/5. Emily Dickinson’s poetry always gets a 5/5 from me. this edition is over-edited - leaving out her unique capitalization and dashes, rearranging and replacing words, and leaving out entire stanzas in some cases. do not fall for the pretty cover. i will be seeking out a better edition.
Midnight Sun by Stephenie Meyer - 4/5. two questions: for the love of dogs, why wasn’t the twilight saga set in a college town? and where was this characterization of bella in the original books? anyway, i actually enjoyed this. Meyer’s prose has improved a lot, and she clearly has had time to think about the story.
A Man Called Ove by Fredrik Backman - 4/5. crying. a beautiful, charming, sad-in-a-good-way story.
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini - 5/5. a classic that deserves to be a classic.
Dark Tales by Shirley Jackson - 5/5. she was a master of creating terror through unease, dread, and anticipation of the unknown. my favorites were “paranoia,” “the beautiful stranger,” and “a visit” (aka “the lovely house”)!
The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath - 3/5. lovely prose, but depressing. tw / cw: suicide, questionable ‘50s mental health treatments, racism, fatphobia, and sexism of the not like other girls variety.
2 notes · View notes
literary-illuminati · 4 months
Text
This book is intensely fascinated by the closeness and connections between love and violence and sex and pain, but describing one werewolf biting a finger off a human hand and chewing it into mush before passing it into another (horribly injured, by him) werewolf's mouth like a baby bird so he'd swallow it and heal as 'like a gentle kiss', might just be the new peak of it.
22 notes · View notes
bookcoverbeauty · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
the devourers
6 notes · View notes
Text
emailing my professors like “i’m sorry but i could not complete my assignments on time because a book had me by the throat”
8 notes · View notes
julientel · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
use your brain, Gale 🧠
9K notes · View notes
infernumequinomin · 3 months
Text
Have we considered what it means that Laois is so good at killing monsters, the one thing he loves, and so bad at fighting humans, the thing he feels most distance from. And inverse Kabru is terrible at killing monsters, the one thing he wants to destroy, but so good at killing humans he would have killed Falin 6 different times when he tried to kill her if her anatomy had been more human, despite his love for and drive to protect humanity? Have we considered what it means to be able to kill that which you love but not that you hate? Has anyone fucking considered the imposter syndrome that has to come from only being good at killing that which you love most??? The fear of not being able to protect yourself from the thing you most think is a threat simply because you cannot find a way to understand it enough to take it's life?
10K notes · View notes