Been thinking about The Two Live Crew Job again, specifically about Sophie and Eliot with the bomb, and... y'know, it's interesting to me, how Sophie looks to Eliot while they're trying to figure out what to do with the bomb. He's not the expert in the room, not really—that’s Parker and Hardison, truth be told, though Eliot’s got more field experience with explosives, and we see that in how they're the ones providing feedback. Heck, Parker's the one that comes up with the solution with the instant pudding. Nate takes the natural leader position, and he and Sophie are... Nate and Sophie. But it's Eliot that we see Sophie consistently coming back to, who she locks eyes with.
That could be for plenty of reasons. He does seem to have the steadiest control of the situation, likely because he's the best at dealing with high-stakes life-threatening issues (the hitter with extensive military experience is, of course, going to be better under that kind of pressure than the ones who are technically civilians). But I think maybe there's another layer there: he's the one she can trust to be blunt.
See, Eliot's not going to try to soften this. He's a tactful person as a general rule, but he also knows when to be honest. Sophie doesn't want this to be softened. I suspect that's because it introduces a layer of instability; if she only hears optimistic viewpoints, there's an uncertainty in what could go wrong, a fear about what might really happen. But Parker and Hardison and Nate don't necessarily get that—in fact, they themselves won't want to stare down the flat truth, and they may take the optimistic standpoint simply to keep themselves comfortable, even without realizing it.
Conversely, Eliot's not (and never has been) the type to try to look only on the bright side. You don't get to do that in his line of work. He knows how to look at all possible outcomes and take the scene in as-is, and he understands that some people don't want platitudes. Sophie's one of them. She knows, then, that she can trust him to tell her exactly what's happening and what the stakes are, no sugar-coating, no shaky voice, just steady truth.
And she knows, too, that he knows when something is a lost cause—and he understands when to cut his losses. Eliot can be impartial in the moment, no matter how much he beats himself up about it later, and he can weigh the odds and decide, coldly, when to abandon her.
The others can't do that. Parker, even here, even now, two years before The Long Way Down Job, could never choose survival over Sophie in that way. Hardison and Nate? They'd stay, no matter how bad the odds, no matter if it was sure that they wouldn't make it. But Eliot can. More importantly, he's the one who can drag the other three out of there.
He's the one Sophie can depend on to keep them alive. Even if it means she dies alone, even if it means she loses that slim, tiny chance she could live—he'll get them out, and they'll live. She won't let them stay behind, and she even shouts that at them, yells at them to get out, and she knows even as she does so that Nate and Parker and Hardison might not listen. But Eliot will. No matter what, Eliot will, and he'll listen to her and follow her orders.
It's Eliot that she watches, and it's him that she keeps steady with, because he'll be honest with her, and he'll be honest with them, and he'll keep them safe, the same way she "[makes] sure we’re all okay," as Hardison so poignantly puts it.
And do you know what else? In spite of all of it, though, in spite of being the one to be blunt, he still manages to be gentle. He's reassuring, holds her gaze and speaks soft and even and gentle, calming, steady, sure. He's the one who hates explosives, who knows exactly how bad this could be, and he stays steady for her.
This is their second year working together. It's mere months after she apologized for lying to them, point-blank, in The Second David Job. Yet there's still this trust, this holding anchored balance, that they'll keep the crew safe together.
But here's the other thing. It's not just that they trust one another with the rest of the crew. It's that Sophie trusts him to keep her safe, and Eliot trusts her to keep him safe, even if "safe" doesn't mean physically. Because sometimes "safe" isn't about that. Sometimes it's safety in reassurance, even when everything is going to go horribly wrong. Sometimes it's safety in keeping secrets, or listening to each other without judgement.
And sometimes, it's about safety in knowing the truth, no matter how vulnerable and terrible it may be.
787 notes
·
View notes
conversations with alhaitham (cw: a little insecure reader/self indulgent)
"haitham, am i not likeable?"
"...why are you asking?"
"you know me, i can't seem to make any friends."
"what are you talking about? you have lots of friends, you practically know all of the akademiya."
"yeah but, they don't last!"
"everything comes to an end, my love."
"but what about us? what if suddenly your feelings change? i can't handle the future. not everything lasts, and i know this! i-i just don't know what i'll do when i lose you too..."
"... we may not know what the future holds. life is ever-changing and nothing is permanent."
"even us?"
"perhaps.
but i don't like that thought either. in the future, there may be a possibility that we will part. be it by our choice, or our untimely death. but here in the present? i would do everything to prevent that future, because i know, with all my heart, that i want to spend the rest of my life with you.
so please, do not fret about the future and focus on me, on the present. because i am certain that i will love you, more than yesterday, and less than tomorrow."
130 notes
·
View notes
Would it be evil of me to say that I want to replay season 2 so I could, (besides trying Lucas' and Noah's routes all the way) also choose money over love with Gaz, at the finale?
I haven't spoken about why I've been off him publicly yet, but.
⚠️ Gary stans, avert your eyes. ⚠️
When I thought back on grocery day, and what I said on it originally from my Gary/R!Hannah analysis post here;
I took a moment to really think about how awful it would've been for MC to hear that, whether she was a
loyal Gary route MC, or
a slowburn mutual pining MC w/ Gaz, because we all know Gary was crushing hard on MC even off-route.
Like okay. It's one thing to wonder what could've been with someone who left the villa on such early days. It's why I'm partially glad R!Hannah did happen, so he could nip that question in the bud sooner, rather than later.
But for him to say that MC was "lucky" he wasn't talking about someone in the villa? To be that disrespectful, and to borderline threaten MC with the prospect that he could just, jump ship on her no matter what, after everything they could've gone through?
It was a bellend, extra comment, that does no favors for him. And a step too far for me personally, because there's no way I would let anyone talk to me that way, like I was so at their mercy. 🤡
(This bit was also from my original post.)
@lasswithumor said it best in her tags—the way he responds to situations when questioned on them can be overtly icky, and he never truly apologized for ANY of it, just told MC that she had to "trust him." 🙄
18 notes
·
View notes