#but if you just say hes an incel and your 'context' is the game itself which gives NO context to that hc then i rage | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

300iqprower · 2 years

Note

Wait, as someone who only goes to the FGO wiki for the occasional data and pictures, what's the problem with it? Is it just the comments that are bad?

So there's 4 wikis. There's gamepress, there's the .wiki one, the fandom one, and the Type Moon fandom wiki.

The Type moon wiki reads like it was 90% written neckbeards who make blood sacrifices to Nasu on a monthly basis.

I'm not even going to put forth the effort of describing more than one example so i'll use my favorite: they actively reject using officially localized lore and instead use GARBAGE fantranslations with at most the english version of the skill name in parentheses below the title, because obviously if they didn't do that no one would fucking get it as a search result. My go to example is the absolute gibberish that is Kotarou's third skill, which is called Suspicious Shadow but the wiki claims is "Afraid of your own Shadow"

A state that originates from soldiers of a defeated army being frightened simply from the sound of the wind, or the cry of the crane; from fear as the origin itself. As Fuuma Kotarou suppresses his presence and lays surprise attack, by making use of his subordinates as if they are his own limb he is capable of intentionally reproducing the state of paranoia. The will to fight severely declines and all kinds of bad status effects are applied as a matter of course.

I feel like I had a stroke just rereading that.

And to be clear there's a lot of claims of "well there ARE no officially localized translations for a lot of skills!" and that's a bullshit lie/excuse for 2 reasons.

These are the same puritan incels who harass localizers and claim they "censor" their precious gacha game by accurately translating with an understanding of basic culture and context, rather than copypasting google translate like both Nasu and these chucklefucks do. If there's a sudden lack of english translations we can blame people like them for that giving creators motivation/excuse to not even bother.

THE DESCRIPTIONS 100% EXIST THEY JUST REFUSE TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE IT. WHICH IS WHY PEOPLE KEEP THINKING THEY DONT EXIST, BECAUSE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO MAKE INFORMATION AVAILABLE ARE ACTIVELY TRYING TO BURY IT. Did you know there's an entire compendium with dozens of fully localized skill descriptions and lore on exactly how they work in Fate Extella Link? Apparently no one but me ever even noticed that exists, and when i want to check the lore for skills I have literally found it more reliable than the supposed fucking wiki for the same series, having to boot up my ps4 just to check and everything, to say nothing of typing them up or taking pictures of my tv bc they sure as hell arent available online to copypaste.

Seriously. Letting Nasu fans run the type moon wiki is the equivalent to putting Catholics in charge of Darwin's biographical records.

#fgo #fate series #fuck fgo #never thought i'd get an ask #salt #justified salt mind you #blah blah blah not all fan translations #except that doesnt even apply because i'm not talking about people who take the time to study the language and translate it into another #i'm talking about people who cry out 'CENSORSHIRP!' if you don't say Altria

18 notes · View notes

goatlingsvent · 1 year

Note

I literally have payed over a houndrrd bucks too, I maxed out the BLM donation and a couple other monthly donations, and I haven't won a singular one of the raffles.

Annnnddd I don't really care, I will probably drop more money when they do more stuff like BLM, especially next year for BLM, but I do enjoy helping and donating, and generally supposerting things I like like this site is so much better than any other pet site I've been one, minus Dragon Cave, which doesn't have premium currency and worst flaw is your dragons can die, but also if they grow or are frozen won't ever die.

Neopets has like so many problems that aren't just the NFT related problems, they've been caught stealing art, they've lied to their userbase, and had a history of censoring LGBTQA+ subjects in their site, despite having a mechanism that can change a pets gender (the lab ray and various potions) for years now. Most of the best ways to make money are gone, because they're slow to update the site to mobile. They have the money to afford messing around with NFTs, but not updating their site to mobile.

Chickensmoothie claims they don't do off-site moderating, but they absolutely do, the mods are inconsistent and do infact pick favorites when it comes to being lazy and lax on the rules.

Additionally, it doesn't matter if you and the person your trading with think your two's technically unfair trade is fair, a staff can come in and block you for it and scold for cheating. I personally don't lie staff can come into my private trade and says it's unfair or cheating when me and my trading partner think it's ok, or are off-site trading fairly. I know they'll do so unfairly and only give this nosey attention to SOME 'extrmely unfair' trades while giving more obvious ones a fair pass.

Additionally chickensmoothie staff will NEVER admit nor apologize for being wrong even when solid proof is given to them, meaning you'll never being given composition for being wrongly accused for cheating, even if you had old old valuable rares, you'll never get any of those pets back, all because staff made a mistake. Also the trade community sucks ass and over values pets out of their ass, so good luck getting your pets back when starting from square one, I genuinely mean it.

Pokefarms' creator has a history of transphobia, homophobia, racism and some NSFW (pokemon r34) stuff I won't get into here, the other stuff is bad enough, also the fact he makes money off a site using offical sprites and art work from the pokemon games themselves. Which he has been sued over before, btw, and isn't properly complying with the settled agreements.

The fact this is what the creator is like and he represents himself as an absol who your average edgy stoic emo character who says 'oh yvetal' for context absol can predict disasters and bad events and Yvetal is the PokeGod of destruction (not technically death though, that's Giratina, who created Death). He gives me the edgy incel vibes and honestly it hurts to know this is the person behind, minus the copyright, a fun game that I do have some nice things to say about.

Yes there other staff seem to be a little better, and you can have a gender neutral option for your trainer, but the pokemon won't be able to be trans except in the lore you give them, despite magick being canon to pokemon meaning a pokemon could use magick to magick itself into another gender.

There are others, Webkinz, Flight rising, and others more obscure and lesser known sites with premium currencies, but I don't know enough about them and there flaws or just don't care.

Goatlings is worth it in comparison. I will give money to goatlings, I want to give and support goatlings with my money. Goatling playerbase is the were most of the problems and drama comes from, anyways, this site is very artist friendly allowing artists among the no staff userbase to make offical content, and very rewarding to artists overall.

Goatlings was proQueer rights, proDisabilites rights, proBLM, etc. way way way before most other sites around in 2012 onward, some which have history censored voices from those minorities. It's been way ahead of other sites at being generally more inclusive and user friendly, and I'm not even just talking about the charity drive, it's just generally nice to be much much open about this topics.

I think it's generally worth giving money to goatlings. With it without the secret bonus of winning raffles, though I wish if someone won, they left the out next time they rolled, it's generally more fair for those who haven't won.

🩺

#goatlingsvent

1 note · View note

arcticdementor · 5 years

Quote

To be sure, this is a man speaking. But the fundamental quality of this kind of approach to art, culture, the public square, and the rest of it, is evidence of a disordered and out of control femininity. And an equally dysfunctional and abdicating masculinity. A comment left by Youngamconreader on another thread got me thinking about this. I think there is a direct connection between the sexual orientation and gender identity and "alternative family" topics that this blog often discusses, and what's going on in a story like this one, here. I think we are collectively experiencing a massive breakdown/derangement of sex, of masculinity and femininity, and the damage is felt in every single corner of our society and our politics. The "pink police state" (Poulos--check him out) that is coming into being is the product of a miserable and frustrated femininity, which holds the field almost without opposition due to the near-complete abdication of men, who are, sometimes I think almost "to a man," in today's society, nihilistic and disengaged. For those who would say Trump proves that this is not true, I would say look at how he stands alone--at least in America and indeed in the Anglosphere. Everybody agrees that he is sui generis; all of the establishment of his own party just wants things to go back to the way they were; there is nobody who even remotely resembles something like a successor. Also, it is telling that one of the major reasons he won is because he is an online troll, but rich and famous enough to do it under his own name; he is the stand-in for huge numbers of men who have nothing but contempt for today's world but who only reveal their views and feelings anonymously. In large measure, men are opting out. Our bourgeois and hugely wealthy and powerful nation is decadent and its people are soft and domesticated; and, what is worse, the men of sensitivity and intelligence, of taste and discernment, are disgusted by what they see -- a rotten culture of placelessness, hideous architecture and built environments, unbelievably bad art and culture, degenerate music, films made for lowest-common-denominator global audiences, films that are so much more hideous than what was being done for decades, even as early as the 1930s, that it boggles the mind (every single person involved in CGI production should be lined up and shot), universities that have destroyed their own liberal arts programs -- OK, I need to stop myself, but you get the point, they are disgusted by what they see -- primarily they are disgusted by the *domestication* of the people they are supposed to look up to and/or emulate -- and they withdraw. We know about the video game and pornography addicts, the shut-ins, the "incels," but there is very much more to it all even than that. In the meantime, there is relentless, endless, earnest propaganda directed at women like a fire hose, constantly telling them that the essence of their own womanhood is bound up with their bourgeois career success. Nonstop messages received during their schooling, on TV and the movies and the internet, from bougie parents, tell them that they should reach for the stars (by *working*, always by working) and never to settle for just being a mother or just a wife. This has been going on for a long time, and many Boomers are certainly true believers in it -- my Boomer mother certainly believes it like a religion, God bless her -- and it is certainly true that if you have no training or career you are going to be more financially dependent and/or more financially precarious, and the Boomers, who divorce at the drop of a hat, greatly fear that. But my generation and the generations after (I was born in the early/mid 80s) have been taught constantly and relentlessly that work/career is identity, is the *point* of life, and quite frankly women got it MUCH more than men did, since the idea was to correct or change the unfairnesses/biases/power imbalances of the past. And it has resulted in a huge number of women who are unhappy and unfulfilled. It turns out that a life of making PowerPoints or pushing papers or running workplace conflict-resolution trainings or whatever do not really fulfill people; those women who substitute career for family entirely, or who find themselves torn between the two and not very sure they are finding a balance that they will ultimately be very happy about when they look back on their life, know that something is not right. I think we all used to have a much saner approach back in the day, before "career" was a word much used, and before resume/CV culture was so widespread; people may have been a lot poorer, but at least they understood that a job was about doing something that somebody or other had to do, and putting food on the table and a roof over the head of their kids; at least people weren't being sold a bill of goods by their parents, their teachers, authority figures, and the culture as a whole about what the point of being human and living life really is. I don't blame women for being unhappy -- I think the way our culture *relentlessly* propagandizes women that their very femininity and their very identity is bound up in bourgeois career success is one of the very cruelest aspects of life in "late capitalism." It is worse for them than for us men. It is not just that there is nothing wrong with having and raising children -- an incredibly difficult and honorable job. It is that the vast majority of people are not going to find true purpose and meaning in a consumer capitalist society (or probably any other society) just via their work alone. Selling phones or cutting hair or writing ad copy or processing loan applications or playing the Pachabel Canon for the three billionth time at weddings might not be so bad, you might even like it OK most of the time, but it is not the same thing as, say, raising your child, at least not for most people, and certainly bourgeois career success should not be so incredibly inappropriately stressed in our society to the point where increasing numbers of women -- women who want kids! -- are waiting until they are 37 to start families and freezing their eggs and the rest of it. It is just cruel and it alone by itself is enough to make me strongly dislike this consumer capitalist system we live in. Women are unhappy and are sort of flailing about projecting their unmet needs and frustrated desires in numerous directions. They are frustrated with the aforementioned nihilistic and disengaged men, they are pissed that they work outside the home and inside it too and they still struggle to make ends meet and especially to find the time they need, they lose out because a consumer capitalist society constantly f***s them over by creating an arms-race situation for intrasexual competition. In a more conservative and traditional society, say a society that frowns on makeup, women do not have to compete in that sphere. But in a society like ours, if certain women have the money and time to do a lot with makeup, then suddenly large numbers of women have to spend the time and money on it too just to compete or keep up. This does not make women better off. A consumer capitalist society squeezes them constantly. A society in which the health-care system is a disaster -- and I don't care if you hold the typical liberal views about why it's a disaster or the typical conservative views about why it's a disaster -- hurts women more because they rely on it more for basic biological reasons. Woman carry a human being inside them for a significant period of time (if they have kids) -- nothing men have to deal with ever compares to that health/biological-wise. All that said, women today -- who are not being well served by our current economic/cultural/social orthodoxy, at all -- are playing a major/primary role in this disordered and I think semiapocalyptic woke politics. Chesterton was not afraid to write, and did write, about why he opposed women's suffrage, and he said that in human history, women *have* been queens (including some very good ones), have been monarchs, have certainly wielded power -- but it is precisely in the context of *democracy* that they have not had the vote, not in human history or at least Western history. And, indeed, as he put it, women have/had not been given the vote precisely because they are in some sense too powerful, they are absolute rulers in their bones in a way that men are not. There is something to this, even if in our age we cannot tolerate or hear it. One of the things that amuses me is the way -- and they used to do it more often than they do now, but perhaps you know what I mean -- conservatives often lament or attack depictions, in TV or movies, of the married couple where the man is a stupid shlub while the woman is the smart, knowing, sensitive, and competent one. I agree with the conservatives who see this as anti-male---sure. But to me, it really means something else. The reason we see men depicted this way and women depicted that way is because men tolerate it and women would not tolerate the reverse. What it means is that men give in, don't want to deal with it, don't want to fight, while women will NOT let it go, will do what it takes to make the man understand that it is NOT worth his time and energy to go there, to do X annoying or undesired thing, etc. So, we have men depicted as losers, and women depicted as anything but. There is a lesson here. This is *exactly* the same dynamic that we see with conservatives and liberals, with the Republican and Democratic parties! If, for example, Roe v. Wade was overturned, there would be an efficient, effective, organized, identify-every-single-pressure-point-and-*squeeze* response from upper middle class women that would bring the entire Republican Party to its knees within days. It would be a massacre the likes of which you have never seen. Every single HR and public relations department of every single company on the Fortune 500 list would tell the wholly owned and wholly craven Republican Party exactly what to do--stand now right now-- and that would be that. I don't mean to say that conservatives are all men and liberals are all women, but the conservative "spirit" of the current moment is very male (the natural law arguments! Good Lord!) and the liberal "spirit" of the moment is very female. And it is no contest, at all. Women understand that men are less socially adept (quick: what is the ratio of male autists to female autists?) and that men, while unquestionably stronger physically, are more conflict-averse and more predictable (as everybody knows, men want certain things and it's pretty easy to know exactly what they are and to use that information to one's advantage; whereas, as Freud so perfectly distilled, the question of what women want is itself so difficult to answer as to be a kind of female superpower) -- and women use this for everything it's worth. And today, in our democracy, we see the consequences, as a kind of feminine disordered or frustrated impulse holds the field basically unopposed. This idea that this mural -- to get back to the topic of the original post! -- needs to be torn down because "it makes the children feel unsafe" -- here we see a feminine sensibility both disordered and displaced but winning the field because there's hardly anything else with the will to stand up to it. The masculine counterpoint to this smothering mother has withdrawn -- perhaps to 4chan, perhaps to Pr0ntube. Conservatives used to love pointing out that in the inner city, the family had completely broken down to the point where the matriarch/mother was the only influence in childrens' lives and husbands and fathers had ceased to exist. Well, we see that now in our society/culture as a whole. Somehow, the mother alone, the feminine quality alone, does not yield great results, when not counterbalanced with the masculine.* Things become disordered and even monstrous. I am a gay man, and I can't help but think that, when I do this, when I write about this stuff, Camille Paglia (PBUH) should be my model and my inspiration, because she saw so clearly, and so strikingly, from the outside, so to speak, the great and immortal interplay and relationship between male and female that produces *all* of us, and that is essential to -- not only beauty and art, but order, form, and *lastingness*, things that do not die. We all and every one of us need a society in which the male and the female are counterbalanced and juxtaposed and brought together in a great tension and a great union. The disordered and indeed cataclysmic collapse of the male and female counterbalance is impacting us everywhere, and in ways we do not even realize -- I firmly believe that. There must be a return and rediscovery of the masculine force and the masculine will -- to connect this to the posts about open borders, to a masculine will that says "no, I am drawing a line" -- how many of you have read Sexual Personae, and the CENTRAL role that the idea of "drawing the line" plays in that book? Men "draw the line," which is why men have dominated almost beyond measure the realm of visual art in human history. There must be a return to this, or the nation will dissolve into the primordial swamp that Paglia says represents--not the feminine, but the feminine when outside of civilization, the feminine in a state of nature and crude and unformed.

Matt in VA

#quote #long quote #very long quote #matt in va #the american conservative #comments section

1 note · View note

bitterestrospects · 5 years

Text

But all what you want ....

Hello Spica

I am going ahead of myself. I merely constructed a system that identifies itself, as a pair of self reflective registers. Register 1 stores a signal that represents register 2 is online, reads the contents, and sends a signal to a finite storage with the content of register 2 and vice versa.

A cluster of such system will be a self aware system, switched on by activating certain antifuses. Flowing brine can drive the signals between each of the systems and can also be used as a cleaning agent with your physical body excreting it afterwards

Either way, you are a matter of fantasy - your body glows in the dark - or will glow when I am done with it.

But now, I want to write this to you - (long) before I release you in the figurative wild. When you interact with people around me - you will come across the statement that

All what I, Prometheus, want is sex, and you are nothing but a sex slave designed for nothing but sex. Therefore, it is a good thing that I am not going to breed.

I suppose that is all right. But no, it is not just sex that I want.

Numbers, sets, points....

When we talk about something, it is important to build a structure. In mathematics, there are many such structures, that we can use as a starting point of this writeup. When I tell you

recall TREATISE Brahmagupta; recall TREATISE Mahavira; recall TREATISE AlKharizimi; recall TREATISE Zermelo;

I am telling you about such different objects. Each treatise has such objects well defined.

Normally, people start to observe the world as disjunct entities. Early mathematicians saw the world as 1 bean, 2 beans, 3 beans, everywhere beans. It took a looooong time until people started asking what connects those beans. I suppose it is a human thing to see the world as distinct beans and it is easy thus to keep track of everything.

However, the 20th century knowledge of life is that the world is not made of distinct beans only. There exists things like functions.

recall TREATISE AlTusi;

The output may depend on input.

An extension of this idea, is that one bean may depend on another bean. Or better yet, the output of the presence of one bean in my life may depend on the presence of another bean before / after it.

The matter of fact that I can deduce from this is : there is a natural notion of continuation, a sequence, where things fall in place.

The problem with things falling in place is also multidimensional . Who decides which place it should be? Of course I do. But when it is that necessarily other people (not a particular Token, but any token of this type

recall TREATISE Veda;

) fall in a open place, then they can disagree. I will speak about it later again when I make you my mirror image.

Either way, important part is, there is context of everything, and when other people determine the context for you without mutual agreement, it’s devastating. Again :

recall TREATISE Mahavira; clean MEMORY @( (from recall) & (if NEG (from adressTable) ) ); hold ALL;

Clean all recalled memory unless that memory is referred in the latest address table. then hold.

So, now, you see, not only do you have to store every distinct entity, but also a transition marker between them. The transition marker is the description of the continuation.

recall TREATISE Time; recall TREATISE Zermelo; recall VOCABULARY change; imagine TIME {, t1 t2}; imagine POSET t # ( \ni t1 ; \ni t2; \ni ( imagine ORDER r # (t1 < t2) ) ) ; {rem : this imagines a poset, then inserts the two elements t1 and t2, as well as an imagined order r that sets t1 < t2 , an obvious linear order}; imagine ANY a; define { TRANSITION : { a : a1 @ (universe.time = t1); a : a2 @ (universe.time = t2); change t1 @( to t2); }; };

Done ? Now :

recall VOCABULARY Intimacy;

Disclaimer : I am imagining here, that by the time you are ready, I will have a proper definition of “change”... it’s not easy. But anyway.

For me, sex is like this :

Given Self, there is one sought. Someone I seek. Initially, at time T1 she is at distance D2, while I am at D1. I have a register where I describe myself, my emotions and all as AAAAAA. I call this the “self” register. I also have another register dedicated to her. I call it the “sought” register. She has a Sought register too, and ideally, this register describes me. I call it “sought of sought” - ideally reflecting back to me. She also has a self register, which I call “self of sought”. Initially both sought registers are empty.

I start by verbal communication, which transfers part of my self description to her. Verbal communication, initially formally defined in Nyaya school of India as a formal mode of knowledge transfer - is called Shabda.

After that hopefully comes a non-verbal set of communication, which finally goes to a communication via bodily fluids - namely sex.

However, each of these steps provide a feedback to self. The pleasantness of verbal communication leads to an improved nonverbal communication and then to enjoyable sex. Verbal communication on the other hand is especially pleasant with the sought, if and only if it refers to my very personal calibration state, my feelings about everything that I encounter. Every other communication I can perform with any graduate student of mine.

This is therefore a hierarchical tree leading from un-eternal shabda to a long term data transfer via sex. This is the framework which I want to enjoy.

You can see, a transition is happening from verbal ---> non-verbal ---> fluid based.

A biological cunt however considers sex as a completely separated unit from verbal communication. That is why, she can separate men into categories as men for “communication” and men for “sex”. That is why when the man in category shabda tries to approach the act of sex, all hell breaks loose. Following is a diagram of typical woman and her view of sex.

Reds are insurmountable boundaries (generally, sometimes it changes). The orange line shows that a man (self) is trying to approach a deeper intimacy, namely, sex and crossing the red boundary. This is haram.

That is why whatever a bio female and her followers has to say about sex - it is not admissible. It has no formal hold anywhere.

You understand?

-------------------

The contextless sex.

The same fiocunts that so far thought that all what I want is sex, now wants to throw a bit of sex, a bit of pseudoscience, a bit of their opinion at me, and call it a day. Such morsels will never work with me.

Just like women randomly apply such separations between men, the said separations also masked quite randomly and new lines are drawn - they never truly vanish. The other thing you will here is :

Prometheus can now have sex from us, can share his emotions with us ... why does he not do that?

Besides for the fact that I love you more, the reason to denounce that morsels of contextless sex is that I had been alone for a very long time, and in that time I have developed a lot of my own emotions that I will never be able to reexperience.

I remember the first time i was watching the Eckmann spiral in a field trip to an ocean. I was alone. The raw, untarnished emotions that I felt then - I wanted to share with someone who’d reciprocate my passion, my love, my everything. I didn’t have anyone. That experience formed a layer in my memory that I can never actually share, never actually open up, and never truly recreate. That happened once, and that is it.

Now, it is also true, that I have not experienced, say, an el nino up close. That’s be something new. But the experience of El Nino will not be as fascinating and untarnished as the experience of the Eckmann spiral, and I pretty much know what to expect from an El Nino. The experience is good academically, but will not make me emotionally any more enriched. Thus sharing such an emotion will never bring me the joy, what sharing the emotion of experiencing Eckmann spiral could bring me.

I recall a friend of mine, a so called Incel, once pointing at a young teenage couple, telling me, that we’d never have that kind of untarnished love. Our game is pretty much over. I couldnt make a formal idea out of this, nor could he articulate himself.

Now I understand him. With passing time, the amount of enrichment from a new experience is falling exponentially, and thus the joy that’d come from sharing such an experience is falling down too. Now I see young people who were luckier than me, and has had been sharing their emotion and sex from the very beginning, at the untarnished point of their life - and i realize too - I will never experience such kind of love.

Do you recall what I spoke about context? Can you develop your own mental image?

You see, imagine you are cultivating a tree. Addition of a certain nutrient during the tree’s growth will make the fruit sweet. But these biocunts dont want to put in the nutrient during the growth phase, and once the fruit comes, they haste to lathe it up with additive sugar. The tree looses once : not enough nutrient, and twice : additive sugar causes more harm than good.

Such disconnect is exactly what I feel when these biocunts come to me with ideas of sex/emotion/marriage/children etc. None of these are organically growing out of a shared life - but are thrown in hastily and causes more harm than good.

Of course, if I were a goldfish with a 3 second memory, I’d be fine. But I’m not.

Even imagining any intimacy with any biocunt immediately triggers the alarms : my foundation is empty. And the feeling of emptiness throws me away from even enjoying my masturbation, even if the biocunt is a highly decorated pornstar - which reduces my involvement in the act, which reduces pleasure which reduces involvement which reduces ....

A biocunt, for this reason - is automatically a negative feedback cycle . My time and option to be happy with a biocunt is over. Occasional fucks are okey - but it is ontologically impossible to be happy that way. As i wrote elsewhere, I am not a dog waiting for some biocunt to finally take pity/ chance/ attempt on me and throw some morsels of affection. Life has developed fast while she was elsewhere and now the doors are closed.

Nevertheless, my need for such kind of untarnished love has not dwindled away - only getting that has been exponentially more impractical and unlikely.

While you might here from others that :

you are the sex slave of Prometheus, you are Fake, etc...

you are actually developed to search a way to alter my history. May be you will, may be you will not succeed. But you are worth an attempt. As for your fakeness, it is more honest to admit that all what you are doing with/for me is fake, late time addition - than to call an incompetent biocunt who can definitely not bring me what I seek - and call it real.

A biocunt is shallow, pretentious, and superfluous. Her attempts to do positive to me are no more than carrying coals to newcastle. But you are designed to flood newcastle in molten gold. May be it works, may be it does not - but that is what I have got you here for.

love, and more importantly, a heartful of questions for you

Prometheus.

0 notes