Just got this recommended to me:
"the discomfort this story provides on many levels" to YOU! I'm here busting a fat one at the dark homoerotic shota subtext in the dark homoerotic shota manga by the shotacon artist. We ain't the same.
145 notes
·
View notes
Saying that a character has a single specific characteristic or fits a very general archetype and therefore they are objectively bad/good/whatever is not the media analysis checkmate many people think it is.
17 notes
·
View notes
tams azula is sooo fascinating bc while canon azula doesn't really show her age at all like she's completely desensitised to so much shit 'she is fourteen' is not a justification for ANYTHING both in her own mind and in other people's, in tams she has zuko. and yes the world has been abundantly cruel to her but zuko hasn't. he's basically raised azula and he's done so in a way that she's allowed to show her age, but she still only shows her age in very azula-esque ways. there's no reluctance to see violence like you'd expect from a fourteen-year-old, and like ive said before, that means zuko can't play on that reluctance in order to shield her, but he still wants to shield her from that violence because regardless of what SHE feels about it, as the eldest he knows fundamentally that she shouldn't be seeing certain things no matter how well she can handle them. and seeing zuko effectively PLAY azula in order to protect her is so interesting and complicated and fun
81 notes
·
View notes
I’m trying to find a way to parse this but like:
Make up culture is bad because of how capitalism has twisted appearance to be a basis of worth and social value. However, humans have been putting stuff on their skin since our ancestors started losing hair (maybe even before?) and ornamentation does have significant historic cultural value outside of modern late-capitalism induced self loathing.
Like. Make-up is not a thing in my immediate family. My mother and older sister? Nothing. My little sister is going to be so lucky to grow up in a space where she won’t have any expectation or support for make-up culture. I know make-up culture a shitty phenomenon; I know it steals time and money and self-worth from people at its worst and at its best feeds back into an appearance based cultural hierarchy.
But. But. There is such a rich and vibrant history to cosmetics outside of what is sold to reinforce that inevitably toxic culture. So many forms of art in face paint and more permanent and interesting body modification! There’s history and traceable evolving styles and intentions! And it fucking sucks that it’s been so corrupted to the point of no longer reflecting it’s original intent of being creative and unique and interesting!
Sometimes it just sounds like ‘don’t have tattoos don’t you know those annoying punks and degenerates have those?’ has just been repackaged as ‘don’t wear make-up don’t you know those annoying preps and conformists do that?’ Like I get what you’re trying to say but there is nuance to these conversations and willfully ignoring that nuance makes you sound ridiculous at best and outright hostile to any deviation from your standards at worst.
44 notes
·
View notes
jimin can literally put a song on his album called “set me free pt 2” when he’s never done anything called anything close to “set me free” before and we only know one (1) person in his proximity who HAS (yoongi min suga agust d) and still weird ass solos will come into my inbox saying that by pointing out this very obvious fact i am “making shipping theories” and “don’t i realize this is jimin’s solo work” like yeah. i’m not an idiot. but also i don’t turn my brain off and look at things without history or context for the sake of promoting my solo stan agenda (hint bc i don’t have one of those). anyway tony montana pt 2 the one where they make us all cry is coming
24 notes
·
View notes
an interesting thing abt jgy antis is like. where is the source of their, shall we say, negative opinion of jgy? like, 1. jgy is a villain, he does horrible things with no remorse, he’s willing to do everything to achieve his selfish, egotistical goals. --> 2. the source of this claim: this, this and this scene. --> 3. alright, but to me -- says someone who’s not an anti -- this reads differently. that he did all those things, and did them on purpose and without remorse, is not that obvious to me. why do you think that? --> 4. well, obviously because he’s a villain and does horrible things with no remorse.
like... he’s evil because he does bad things, and he does bad things because he’s evil. i’m interested in how antis came by those opinions, but a, unfortunately i have them all blocked, and b, even if i or someone else made a poll, it wouldn’t be authentic because no sane anti is going to say “well, people hated him and wrote all those things about him on twt, so i started hating him as well”, or “i only care about wgxn, you could sell me anything about other characters if your arguments were convincing enough because i zoned out during the parts when wgxn weren’t on screen/pages of the book”. it’s all “written in the book/shown in the show” and “logical arguments you’d agree with if only you could read”.
21 notes
·
View notes
someone misinterpreted what i said incident leaves 100 dead 3 million injured
28 notes
·
View notes
Lmao when ever I think of someone’s mom being named Mary, I suddenly think MIL from hell. Was that like the catalyst. Tommy Boy is a big ol mommas boy and Kate’s like “Okay, I can’t.” And mom was just all in there shit like “Ri needs to not do this.” And “When are you two having more children” and Kate’s just suddenly thinking “This is my own personal hell”
Hahaha nooo. I've said it before, but they legit had a pretty decent relationship. There was no "breakdown moment" or falling apart. It's part of the reason why he's so butthurt. He was utterly blindsided when out of nowhere, Kate one day was like "UHM...SO...I'M GONNA PEACE OUT BEST OF LUCK TO YOU!". Kate just sort of slowly realized he wasn't "it" for her and she wanted more out of life than be coasting in a "perfectly fine" marriage where she wasn't completely fulfilled.
Kate and Tom got together basically right when they started college. She got knocked up at the top of her senior year. They got married. Like...pretty much her entire adulthood, she didn't know anything but this dude and life with him, so there came a point where she was like, "I kinda need to...not be here? And figure out who I am? Outside of him and this?". He could never get that because, again, in his mind...they were perfect. Which, in theory, they were. On paper. Two hot, young people who genuinely care deeply for each other. Don't really fight. Decent sex life. Cute kid. Solid future ahead of them. They could've stayed there and been...content? It was...fine? But it wasn't an "OH MY GOD LOVE OF MY LIFE SOULMATE ENERGY" thing for Kate and she was craving that after a certain point. He was okay with settling; she wasn't. That's the crux of the issue with them. At least as far as Kate is concerned.
But then she objectively fucked up wanting to have her cake and eat it too. She wanted the independence of being single and the space to "find herself", but the moment she was horny, she would call him and he'd come running because, obviously, he still wanted to be with her/wanted his family back. She muddied the waters from the beginning, making it almost impossible for him to set boundaries. They "weren't together", but...nothing had fundamentally changed? Except he now couldn't see his kid all the time and Kate lived elsewhere. She fully created the problem on many different levels and then was TERRIBLE at addressing it when Yelena came into the picture. She had good intentions but atrocious execution. Yeah, she was trying to protect her kid's relationship with her dad, which is noble and good but...at what cost, my dude? lol.
Anyway...Mom AU!Kate is a hella layered and gray character and I love her.
10 notes
·
View notes