Tumgik
#Samherji
atsvensson · 2 years
Text
Islands största fiskebåtar 2022
Islands största fiskebåtar 2022
Island domineras av ett fåtal stora fiskeriföretag. Allra störst är Samherji som äger fiskebåtar i en lång rad länder. Samherji är också dominerande ägare i Síldarvinnslan hf, Utgerdarfelag Akureyringa ehf. Störst om bara fiskebåtar på Island räknas är dock Utgerðarfélag Reykjavíkur hf (Brim Seafood) som är huvudägare i Brim hf. Andra större fiskeriföretag med pelagiskt fiske är Isfelag…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
aishavass · 8 months
Link
"Customers may gain deep information about the market's competitive environment and current trends b
0 notes
nordnews · 1 year
Text
The District Attorney's Office dropped criminal charges against Samherji but did not complete its investigation into the case in Namibia. In an interview with the portal Fréttabla...
0 notes
hatari-translations · 3 years
Note
can you maybe tell us a bit more about the parties in icelandic politics? that is super interesting for me after reading your last post
Well, sure! Please bear in mind that as you may have gathered I am not unbiased, and I'm by no means the most knowledgeable person about this.
Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn (The Independence Party)
Originally founded in 1929, this party's name originally referred to independence from Denmark (achieved in 1944), but today it's just Iceland's dominant right-wing party. On other countries' scales they're fairly center-right in terms of policies; they want a strong welfare system, they're pro-immigration, they're not against LGBT rights, etc. However, they are very much the party of Iceland's rich elite establishment, and in particular have close ties to Iceland's largest corporations, and every other political scandal involves them being varying degrees of terrible, from "Independence Party minister breaking COVID restrictions" to "Independence Party minister in the Panama Papers" to "Independence Party minister's father signs a letter to 'restore the honor' of a convicted pedophile" (these three were all the same minister, who by the way still leads the party and is still finance minister) to "terrible corrupt fishing company Samherji introduced the Independence Party's health minister as 'our guy in the government' at meetings with the Namibian officials they were bribing".
The Independence Party opposes the new constitution, ostensibly because blah blah stability distractions about how changes to the constitution need to be approved through the appropriate process (yes, we know, we want that process to happen), but we all know it's really because the new constitution would have the fishing companies pay a fair price for their access to Iceland's natural resources, and that would be bad for their bottom line. They are also opposed to joining the EU.
The Independence Party has been the largest party in every single Icelandic election since it was founded except the 2009 one (which was right on the heels of another scandal - believe me, I barely scratched the surface above - as well as the 2008 financial crisis), where they managed to dip below the Social-Democratic Alliance with 23.7% of the vote, their lowest parliamentary election result ever. Historically they'd get upwards of 40% or even more of the vote; these days it's more like 25%, and this election's result of 24.4% is their second lowest ever. Even in polls days right after a huge scandal, the lowest I've ever seen the Independence Party poll at was something like 19%; that's why I've said here that 20% of the country will just vote for them no matter what. This means the Independence Party is always the most powerful party, and them not being in the government coalition is very much the exception.
Framsóknarflokkurinn (The Progressive Party)
Iceland's oldest political party, founded in 1916. Originally it was the farmers' party, and they've historically been most popular in rural areas, where they have longstanding loyalty. They're more or less center to center-right. Historically, they've formed coalitions with both the right and the left, but particularly in the past few decades they have been glued to the Independence Party in particular. They have occasional particular pet issues that they latch onto, but overall it doesn't really feel like they stand for much of anything in particular, other than wanting to maintain the status quo and be in government with (preferably) the Independence Party. They are also against the new constitution and the EU.
Vinstrihreyfingin - grænt framboð (The Left-Green Movement)
Founded in a 1999 split on the left, the Left-Greens are a left-wing party with a focus on equality and the environment, but with enough of a semi-conservative bent to have some common ground with Independence and Progressives on matters like opposing EU membership and being hesitant about the Constitutional Committee's draft constitution. A lot of their voters were very unhappy with them entering into the current coalition with the Independence Party and the Progressive Party (the former in particular); two of their MPs actually left the party after that decision, reducing but not destroying the government's majority.
Samfylkingin (The Social-Democratic Alliance)
Founded in 2000 as a fusion of two parties (hence the 'alliance'), the Social-Democratic Alliance is a center-left social democratic party. They were very popular in the early 2000s, almost rivaling the Independence Party for votes, and formed a coalition government with Independence in 2007, which oversaw the 2008 financial crisis; initially people mostly blamed the Independence Party, allowing the Alliance to become the biggest party in the 2009 election with 29.8% of the vote, but as the following coalition with the Left-Greens had to deal with the fallout of the recession, a lot of anger was directed at the Alliance too, and the party has never managed to recover since, instead hovering between 5-15% of the vote (but still stands strong in some municipal elections and currently leads the Reykjavík city council). They want to join the EU and ratify the new constitution.
Píratar (The Pirate Party of Iceland)
You may have heard of Pirate Parties before, originating with the Pirate Party of Sweden. Iceland is the only country where the Pirate Party has actually managed to get elected to the national parliament, and is an entirely serious political movement. At one point after the revelation of the Panama Papers, the Pirate Party was miraculously polling at 43%; sadly, by the time there was an actual election they'd gone down to 15%. Their primary concerns are transparency, democracy, privacy, human rights and freedoms, and "no bullshit", and among other things they want to establish a universal basic income. A lot of its founders were computer scientists and geeks of various stripes.
They refuse to be classified on the left-right scale, but in practice, their policies are strongly aligned with the leftier parties (one popular website comparing the parties on concrete policy questions for this election classed them as having 90% agreement with the Social-Democratic Alliance, 87% with the Socialists, and 83% with the Left-Greens). They are strongly in favor of ratifying the new constitution.
Miðflokkurinn (The Center Party)
After the 2008 financial crisis, the Progressive Party gained a more populist bent, led by Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, who was prime minister from 2013 until 2016 when he was implicated in the Panama Papers. He was reluctant to resign as prime minister and fully intended to stay as the leader of the party, until the party chose to boot him and replace him with current Progressive leader Sigurður Ingi Jóhannsson; Sigmundur Davíð went off to form his own party instead, the Center Party, and took the populist arm of the Progressive Party with him. They're where most of the anti-immigration and anti-LGBTQ vote goes, and along with the People's Party, some of their MPs were implicated in "Klausturgate", a scandal where a disabled woman at a bar overheard and discreetly recorded several MPs (including Sigmundur Davíð) who were drinking together while making a variety of sexist, homophobic and ableist comments about named people including members of their own parties. The Center Party was perfectly happy to keep them on board, which really says all you need to know.
I am unendingly disappointed that the Center Party managed to scrape past the 5% threshold to get parliamentary seats this election; for a glorious moment the early numbers looked like they wouldn't. Last election they managed to get seven MPs, and then the two guys from the People's Party involved in Klausturgate joined up with the Center Party too, giving them nine, so seeing them reduced to almost nothing was still deeply pleasing.
Viðreisn (The Reform Party)
A center-right party that split off from the Independence Party in 2016, largely over the latter's opposition to the EU, while the Reform Party supports EU membership, but also because of the endless scandals, cronyism, etc. The Reform Party instead claim to be proponents of "ethical capitalism" and have so far avoided the major scandals and general douchebaggery of their parent party.
Flokkur fólksins (The People's Party)
A populist party with a primary emphasis on eradicating poverty, especially for the elderly and disabled, letting the nation reap the benefits of our fish instead of the few large fishing companies, funding health care to reduce wait times, and so on. All this is lovely in theory, but unfortunately their rhetoric then goes off into pitting the poor/elderly/disabled against immigrants, Muslims, etc. Chairperson Inga Sæland seems totally well-meaning to me off what I've seen of her (disclaimer: have not actually seen that much), but it also contains less savoury people and sentiments, as seen by two of their MPs being part of the aforementioned Klausturgate. To the party's credit, they did expel those guys, but it's not the only example of the party attracting questionable people.
Sósíalistaflokkur Íslands (The Icelandic Socialist Party)
A hardline democratic socialist party founded in 2017, with this as their first parliamentary election. It looked like they would get MPs in polls, but in the end they didn't. They're led by Gunnar Smári Egilsson, one of the original founders of free newspaper Fréttablaðið, and have a much more radical left rhetoric going on than the other lefty parties, focusing on economic equality, housing, free health care, and a shorter work week. They made some pretty controversial remarks campaigning for this election, such as suggesting replacing all the judges of the Supreme Court if they won't agree to changing the fishing quota system (the argument being that the Independence Party appointed all the judges in an organized bid to maintain the current system), but who knows if that dampened their following or something else. They also want to ratify the new constitution.
14 notes · View notes
ecoportalnet · 3 years
Text
De langostas y mafiosos: ¿qué compañías saquean los océanos?
Tumblr media
Si a cualquiera se le pregunta por el nombre de una compañía procesadora de alimentos, es probable que la respuesta no incluya el de alguna corporación pesquera. ¿Cuántas personas han escuchado hablar de Red Chamber Group, el principal comercializador de camarón a nivel mundial? ¿O de Mowi, el mayor productor de salmón cultivado? Pero las grandes compañías pesqueras no son peces flacos. Dominan una industria global con un valor que está por sobre los 400 mil millones de dólares anuales, provee un 20% de la proteína animal a nivel global y emplea a 60 millones de personas.  Es necesario estar mucho muy alerta con estas compañías. Son los principales culpables de industrializar los océanos, lo que está diezmando completamente la vida marina silvestre del mundo. De un modo importante, son responsables de la destrucción de la pesca artesanal, del colapso de las reservas de peces y de la crisis de la contaminación del plástico en los océanos. También son importantes causantes del cambio climático. La industria obtiene sus ganancias de la explotación laboral, de los generosos subsidios gubernamentales y de una corrupción enorme. La mayor parte de esto lo hacen pasando desapercibidos, con poco escrutinio o atención pública. En un esfuerzo por entender estas corporaciones que operan con tanto sigilo, GRAIN revisó el perfil  de las cien compañías pesqueras más grandes del mundo elaborado por Undercurrent News. En los párrafos siguientes, compartimos los principales puntos de nuestros hallazgos. 1) Un número pequeño de compañías domina el mercado global y la concentraciónes cada vez mayor Para una actividad económica, tan extendida geográficamente y en la que participan tantas personas, incluyendo a decenas de millones de pescadores artesanales, el nivel de concentración es en verdad impactante. Las utilidades totales de las 100 principales compañías durante 2019 fueron 108 mil millones de dólares, lo que corresponde más o menos a un cuarto del mercado global. Pero sólo diez compañías obtuvieron 44 mil millones de dólares (ver tabla), sin incluir las utilidades de las subsidiarias en las que son accionistas minoritarios. Tan sólo la compañía noruega Mowi controla 23% del mercado del salmón en el mundo. La industria ya está muy concentrada, pero no dejan de ocurrir nuevas adquisiciones y fusiones, y se espera que continúen ocurriendo. Las compañías pesqueras compiten de manera intensa (aunque igual fijan precios y hacen inversiones conjuntas), con muchas quiebras y peleas por expansiones y cuotas. La mayoría de las compañías e integran verticalmente —y controlan desde las naves de arrastre al procesamiento, y desde la producción de alimentos para peces a las granjas piscícolas. Fishing Trawler 2) La mayoría de las corporaciones pesqueras tienen su sede en Europa, Japón, Estados Unidos y China; sin embargo, la mayor parte de la captura se realiza en otros zonas Por lejos, Japón lidera al grupo, seguido por EUA, España, Noruega y China. Resulta notorio que no haya compañías africanas o de las Islas del Pacífico en los primeros lugares, siendo que la mayoría de los principales operadores pesqueros del mundo pescan de manera muy activa en sus aguas. Los derechos de pesca pertenecientes a los países de África, Asia y América Latina son ahora equivalentes a una mercancía, objeto de negociaciones en los tratados de libre comercio, y con mecanismos de soborno encubiertos. Las grandes pesqueras industriales por arrastre que están detrás de este caótico panorama, también son las principales beneficiarias de los subsidios gubernamentales, que en la actualidad alcanzan los 35 mil millones de dólares anuales, según la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas para el Comercio y el Desarrollo. Cerca de 60% de este apoyo público está directamente relacionado con la sobrepesca, señala la UNCTAD. 3) La piscicultura —las granjas de peces— tiene un rápido desarrollo La piscicultura, tanto mar adentro como en las costas, es el sector productor de alimentos de mayor crecimiento en el mundo, hace notar la revista Hakai. Y, como es de esperar, es un gran mecanismo de expansión para muchas de las corporaciones pesqueras más grandes. Más de 50% de las cien firmas principales, tiene operaciones de piscicultura. El salmón es probablemente el pez más cultivado entre los grandes actores, pero varias compañías japonesas también han comenzado a cultivar atún. En los planes de las grandes compañías de cultivo de peces, es altamente prioritario conseguir que los gobiernos les entreguen más licencias para expandir sus operaciones. Y en su búsqueda por ser más sustentables ambientalmente, es decir más rentables. También buscan nuevas tecnologías digitales de inteligencia artificial y otras que les permitan construir y operar granjas de peces mar adentro. 4) Los costos sociales y ambientales son enormes La industria pesquera global genera, en forma masiva, contaminación y deshechos. De acuerdo al reciente documental de Netflix, La pesca insostenible  la pesca industrial es la principal fuente de basura plástica en los océanos, aunque muchas personas creen que proviene de los envases de champú, las bolsas de tiendas y las botellas de agua. La sobrepesca es cada vez mayor, especialmente para la producción de alimento para la piscicultura (harina y aceite de pescado). La mayor parte de ésta ocurre en aguas donde hay poco patrullaje o es fácil abusar, lo que destruye el sustento de las comunidades locales. En términos de cambio climático, según lo deja en claro el informe de Undercurrent News, las principales compañías aún no informan el alcance total de las emisiones de las que son responsables. Con todo esto, el costo ambiental debido a esta industria fue de 50 mil millones de dólares entre 2013 y 2019, según lo señala DeadLoss 5) Los crímenes son un lugar común Resulta raro ver tanta mención de criminalidad y de escándalos sanitarios, laborales o medioambientales en las publicaciones de la industria. Los perfiles elaborados por Undercurrent News sobre las cien compañías principales, así como los informes relacionados, están repletos de ejemplos de fijación de precios, incendios de fábricas, brotes de enfermedades, crecimiento explosivo de algas, pérdida de peces, esclavitud, sobornos y fraude. En muchos casos, el tráfico de personas y la corrupción en la industria pesquera han sido parte de los titulares de prensa a nivel mundial gracias a valientes denunciantes. Esto es especialmente el caso en el Sudeste de Asia, el Pacífico y lugares de África. Aparte de algunos juicios espectaculares, como el que intenta investigar a fondo lo que hizo Samherji de Islandia en Namibia, no es mucho lo que está cambiando. La pandemia global de Covid-19 empeoró la situación. La industria ha sido golpeada fuertemente por la crisis, en términos de pérdida de ventas, pérdida de capacidad de distribución o pérdida de trabajadores. Esto aumenta el intento por recuperarse, tomando atajos, en especial a través del salvavidas de los nuevos tratados de libre comercio que hoy son negociados y firmados. 6) Las ganancias son enormes De acuerdo al reciente informe de The Guardian, la industria salmonera vende 20 mil millones de dólares al año y es “tremendamente rentable”. Solamente en Escocia, las operaciones de Mowi, “en un buen trimestre”, recolectan £58 millones (69 millones de dólares). Su utilidad neta global en 2019 fue la increíble suma de €476 millones (524 millones de dólares). No es de extrañar, entonces, que las empresas de capital privado estén tan profundamente involucradas en las compañías pesqueras – y vice versa (el director ejecutivo de Mowi, durante 20 años, renunció recientemente y se unió a una firma de capital privado dedicada principalmente a invertir en piscicultura. Su nuevo director ejecutivo viene de Deloitte). Los bancos también sienten una gran atracción por esta industria, como lo muestra un reciente informe de Greenpeace sobre el sector del atún, igualmente rentable. ¿Qué se debe hacer? La Pesca Insostenible de Netflix atrajo mucha crítica, desde Madagascar a las Filipinas, por no incluir adecuadamente las perspectivas y realidades de las comunidades costeras. Y con razón. Después de todo, ellos dependen de la pesca para su sustento y la pesca artesanal es la base de la alimentación, la salud, ingresos y otros beneficios para las comunidades cercanas. Sin embargo, el consumo global de alimentos provenientes del mar se ha duplicado en los últimos cincuenta años y está claro que el sobreconsumo sin sentido que impulsa a este crecimiento —donde los tratados comerciales y las juntas directivas de las corporaciones son los culpables, no los consumidores individuales— tiene que parar. También queda claro que si nos deshacemos de los incentivos a la pesca industrial, se aplican reglas antimonopolio y otras regulaciones y se protege de manera activa a los pescadores artesanales y a sus mercados, avanzaríamos un largo camino en la resolución de muchos de los problemas con los que ahora estamos lidiando. Se habla mucho de pesqueras sustentables, pero ¿quien confiaría en que una industria que ha hecho tanto daño a nuestro planeta, y demostrado tal desprecio por la fauna silvestre y la vida humana, llegue de un momento a otro a ser un buen protector de los recursos? ¿Sobre todo cuando el sistema de certificación también está sometido a los negocios fraudulentos? Necesitamos apoyar activamente a los pescadores artesanales y a los trabajadores pesqueros en su lucha por la sobrevivencia. No son responsables del caos en que estamos, pero ciertamente pueden ser capaces de conducirnos para salir de esto. Ver MAPA completo de la Producción mundial de productos de mar Ecoportal.net FUENTE Read the full article
0 notes
Text
0 notes
som2ny-news · 3 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Attempted murder accusations prompt Samherji CEO to file charges against whistleblower
0 notes
atsvensson · 2 years
Text
Brim blir delägare i danskt fiskhandelföretag
Det isländska fiskeriföretaget Brim Hf har köpt 50% av Polar Seafood Denmark A/S. Ägare av resterande 50% är det grönländska fiskeriföretaget Polar Seafood Greenland A/S som är Grönlands största privata fiskeriföretag. Brim hf är Islands största fiskeriföretag vad gäller hemmamarknaden och det näst största om även internationell verksamhet räknas in så är dock Samherji störst. Aktierna som ägs…
View On WordPress
0 notes
aishavass · 8 months
Link
"Customers may gain deep information about the market's competitive environment and current trends b
0 notes
hatari-translations · 4 years
Text
Hljómskálinn interview on image, 8.3.20
This Sunday, Matthías and Klemens appeared on music-oriented show Hljómskálinn on RÚV, discussing the concept of image. Translation below.
The main segment with them starts at about one minute in; the hosts start by discussing how Hatari is a performance art band, and how they have a gimp, unlike most bands. Then, after showing a bit from the intro of the KEXPort video with “Dansið eða deyið” and “Biðröð mistaka”, the actual interview starts.
MATTHÍAS: In the theater, as soon as a person steps onto the stage, they’re a symbol for something else, and you give them some meaning that transcends just the man or woman standing there.
KLEMENS: But the difference from being an actor in a play is that the play ends, but the band continues.
MATTHÍAS: The band continues, and the audience thinks this is what the people on the stage are like.
[Clip of Hatari at Reykjavík Pride 2019.]
HOST: Now the band has become known internationally, in these costumes, with this image.
MATTHÍAS: Yes.
KLEMENS: Yes.
MATTHÍAS: It’s hard to shake that off.
KLEMENS: Well, we have tried a lot of different things. Like at the protest at Austurvöllur, we dressed up in the regalia of capitalism.
HOST: You wore suits.
KLEMENS: We wore suits, with slicked-back hair.
MATTHÍAS: It was “Democracy, not plutocracy”, the protest that followed the Panama papers. [It wasn’t actually the Panama papers; it was the “Fishrot Files”, about corruption in the fishing industry. Matthías just misspoke here.]
HOST: Right.
MATTHÍAS: I thought it was very appropriate to sing, “The story has become familiar / This cycle would be tragicomic.” Which was then used in a Kveikur episode [in-depth investigative journalism show that originally exposed the corruption]. After the Fishrot Files they went back, and they had a clip of the protest. I was pretty happy to see that.
[Said clip of the protest and “14 ár”. For fun, the protest signs shown say: “Politicians shouldn’t write the constitution; the people should”, “Dracula wouldn’t get a job at the Blood Bank, so why -> [picture of Ásgeir Jónsson, director of the National Bank of Iceland]”, “Samherji exploits Iceland and Namibia”, and “Where is the new constitution?”, “Gitify the law corpus #gitifythelawcorpus #gitlaw”, “A Human Future”, and “Democracy, not plutocracy”.]
KLEMENS: We’ve always been working to break free of the image that people associate with us. From being an underground punk band to participating in Eurovision is such a breach of that image.
MATTHÍAS: It’s a goal in itself to fail to meet the audience’s expectations. You’ve got a bit... [He points out to Klemens that he said his entire last bit with a bit of marshmallow stuck on his chin.]
KLEMENS: Here?
HOST: Was it fun, participating in Eurovision?
MATTHÍAS: No.
KLEMENS: No.
MATTHÍAS: Well, fun is... it was a lot of things, but fun is not the first word I’d use.
[Clip of “Hatrið mun sigra” at Eurovision.]
KLEMENS: It was a real rollercoaster, and maybe in a different context it would’ve been great fun. But there was just so much going on, and of course we had certain goals for the trip, so... it was fun at times, yeah, but it was pretty exhausting.
MATTHÍAS: And it was just so paradoxical, and varied, and tragic.
KLEMENS: To be sneaking into Palestine and experiencing the apartheid and the conditions that Palestinians have to live with was just really absurd. And coming back to the Eurovision bubble and having to be in character somehow.
[Clip of the “Klefi/Samed” music video.]
KLEMENS: At first, of course, we refused all interviews, unless we had full directorial control over them. Then somehow came that jump into Eurovision, which exposed us so much we kind of lost our grip on the image cultivation.
HOST: I remember a fun interview before Eurovision, where the Eurovision participants [he means Söngvakeppnin; we kind of call it Eurovision a lot] were here at home in a set.
[Clip of that interview. The host asks, “You’ve been featured in the Israeli press and been on the front pages of newspapers and so on. How do you deal with all this media frenzy and the associated badgering?” Matthías looks around, Klemens whispers to him, and Matthías says “Hatari celebrates critical discourse!” before raising his hand robotically while Klemens twitches a bit as if to follow him but then just stares deadpan into the camera.]
MATTHÍAS: That was our first on-camera interview, and we still don’t really know how to do this. We kind of... experimented, and this is how it went, regardless of what you think about that. And then we did more experiments as we went on.
[Clip of the “cousin handshake”.]
That’s the end of the actual Hatari segment, but during the end credits there’s a little outtake of a familiar anecdote:
KLEMENS: There was some Spanish woman who was interviewing me and asked if I liked donuts.
MATTHÍAS [in English]: “Do you like donalds?”
KLEMENS: And I thought she was saying “Donalds”, which I thought might be a participant. So I went all “Yeah, I like Donalds, he’s a great guy.” And from that sprouted... all the fans have been sending us donuts, and making shirts with donuts on them, “Donalds Donuts Company”.
50 notes · View notes
wiseguyreport1222 · 3 years
Link
The Land Based Salmon Farming market report provides a detailed analysis of global market size, regional and country-level market size, segmentation market growth, market share, competitive Landscape, sales analysis, impact of domestic and global market players, value chain optimization, trade regulations, recent developments, opportunities analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, area marketplace expanding, and technological innovations..
GET FREE SAMPLE PDF:https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/7284858-global-land-based-salmon-farming-market-2021-by
Market segmentation Land Based Salmon Farming market is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2016-2026, the growth among segments provide accurate calculations and forecasts for revenue by Type and by Application. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets.
Market segment by Type, covers Atlantic Salmon Others
REPORT DETAILS :https://www.wiseguyreports.com/reports/7284858-global-land-based-salmon-farming-market-2021-by#related_reports
Market segment by Application, can be divided into Food Service Sector Retail Sector
Market segment by players, this report covers Danish Salmon Kuterra Limited Atlantic Sapphire Nordic Aquafarms Andfjord Salmon Pure Salmon Samherji fiskeldi ltd Swiss Lachs Sustainable Blue Aquabounty West Creek Aquaculture Cape Nordic Corporation Jurassic Salmon Superior Fresh Matorka Shandong Ocean Oriental Sci-Tech Fish Farm UAE Cape d’Or
TABLES OF CONTENTS
1 Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Land Based Salmon Farming 1.2 Classification of Land Based Salmon Farming by Type 1.2.1 Overview: Global Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size by Type: 2020 Versus 2021 Versus 2026 1.2.2 Global Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue Market Share by Type in 2020 1.2.3 Atlantic Salmon 1.2.4 Others 1.3 Global Land Based Salmon Farming Market by Application 1.3.1 Overview: Global Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size by Application: 2020 Versus 2021 Versus 2026 1.3.2 Food Service Sector 1.3.3 Retail Sector 1.4 Global Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size & Forecast 1.5 Global Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size and Forecast by Region 1.5.1 Global Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size by Region: 2016 VS 2021 VS 2026 1.5.2 Global Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size by Region, (2016-2021) 1.5.3 North America Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size and Prospect (2016-2026) 1.5.4 Europe Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size and Prospect (2016-2026) 1.5.5 Asia-Pacific Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size and Prospect (2016-2026) 1.5.6 South America Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size and Prospect (2016-2026) 1.5.7 Middle East and Africa Land Based Salmon Farming Market Size and Prospect (2016-2026) 1.6 Market Drivers, Restraints and Trends 1.6.1 Land Based Salmon Farming Market Drivers 1.6.2 Land Based Salmon Farming Market Restraints 1.6.3 Land Based Salmon Farming Trends Analysis 2 Company Profiles 2.1 Danish Salmon 2.1.1 Danish Salmon Details 2.1.2 Danish Salmon Major Business 2.1.3 Danish Salmon Land Based Salmon Farming Product and Solutions 2.1.4 Danish Salmon Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2019-2021) 2.1.5 Danish Salmon Recent Developments and Future Plans 2.2 Kuterra Limited 2.2.1 Kuterra Limited Details 2.2.2 Kuterra Limited Major Business 2.2.3 Kuterra Limited Land Based Salmon Farming Product and Solutions 2.2.4 Kuterra Limited Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2019-2021) 2.2.5 Kuterra Limited Recent Developments and Future Plans 2.3 Atlantic Sapphire 2.3.1 Atlantic Sapphire Details 2.3.2 Atlantic Sapphire Major Business 2.3.3 Atlantic Sapphire Land Based Salmon Farming Product and Solutions 2.3.4 Atlantic Sapphire Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2019-2021) 2.3.5 Atlantic Sapphire Recent Developments and Future Plans 2.4 Nordic Aquafarms 2.4.1 Nordic Aquafarms Details 2.4.2 Nordic Aquafarms Major Business 2.4.3 Nordic Aquafarms Land Based Salmon Farming Product and Solutions 2.4.4 Nordic Aquafarms Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2019-2021) 2.4.5 Nordic Aquafarms Recent Developments and Future Plans 2.5 Andfjord Salmon 2.5.1 Andfjord Salmon Details 2.5.2 Andfjord Salmon Major Business 2.5.3 Andfjord Salmon Land Based Salmon Farming Product and Solutions 2.5.4 Andfjord Salmon Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2019-2021) 2.5.5 Andfjord Salmon Recent Developments and Future Plans 2.6 Pure Salmon 2.6.1 Pure Salmon Details 2.6.2 Pure Salmon Major Business 2.6.3 Pure Salmon Land Based Salmon Farming Product and Solutions 2.6.4 Pure Salmon Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2019-2021) 2.6.5 Pure Salmon Recent Developments and Future Plans 2.7 Samherji fiskeldi ltd 2.7.1 Samherji fiskeldi ltd Details 2.7.2 Samherji fiskeldi ltd Major Business 2.7.3 Samherji fiskeldi ltd Land Based Salmon Farming Product and Solutions 2.7.4 Samherji fiskeldi ltd Land Based Salmon Farming Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2019-2021) 2.7.5 Samherji fiskeldi ltd Recent Developments and Future Plans
Market segment by regions, regional analysis covers North America (United States, Canada, and Mexico) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia, Italy, and Rest of Europe) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, India, Southeast Asia, Australia, and Rest of Asia-Pacific) South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America) Middle East & Africa (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa)
The content of the study subjects, includes a total of 12 chapters: Chapter 1, to describe Land Based Salmon Farming product scope, market overview, market opportunities, market driving force and market risks. Chapter 2, to profile the top players of Land Based Salmon Farming, with revenue, gross margin and global market share of Land Based Salmon Farming from 2019 to 2021. Chapter 3, the Land Based Salmon Farming competitive situation, revenue and global market share of top players are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast. Chapter 4 and 5, to segment the market size by type and application, with revenue and growth rate by type, application, from 2016 to 2026. Chapter 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, to break the market size data at the country level, with revenue and market share for key countries in the world, from 2016 to 2021.and Land Based Salmon Farming market forecast, by regions, type and application, with revenue, from 2021 to 2026. Chapter 11 and 12, to describe Land Based Salmon Farming research findings and conclusion, appendix and data source.
...continued
CONTACT DETAILS :
+44 203 500 2763
+1 62 825 80070
971 0503084105
0 notes