#especially with my own personal narrative involving a lot of pursuing various dreams that did not work out | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

villainever · 5 years

Text

Killing Eve + making worlds and workplaces for women

killing eve very frequently – and obviously quite rightly – gets discussed as a feminist screen text, but i feel like we often talk about the individual characters, how fantastic they clearly are, and how flawed/developed/multifacted/interesting they’ve grown to be. but another thing killing eve does phenomenally well is subvert power structures and institutions, and populate them with women in a way we rarely see. for example, in season 1, eve’s MI5 office is unusually gender-balanced for television (it’s her, elena, bill and frank), and when carolyn is introduced, she’s immediately painted as almost an urban legend – elena raves about how incredible she is and how much she’d love to work with her, and we’re positioned to view her with intrigue and awe. this “mysterious, unreadable, probably damaged but definitely utterly competent and slightly amoral” character would typically go to a man – probably a slightly misogynistic one who’d gradually form a “grudging respect” for the women on his new team, as the women act as a device to coax him into the New Modern World and soothe his trauma. but carolyn gives this archetype an internal makeover and new vitality, and neatly sidesteps stereotyping: she’s not a “bitchy boss”; she never yells, or insults; she’s at times eerily calm, and methodically works her way through problems. this is especially poignant when we think of male characters who rail against female leaders for being “too emotional”, and proceed to spend half the movie throwing tamper-tantrums. at the same time, though, she doesn’t feel emotionless to prove a point, or simply to be the stoic; we get a very real sense of her pragmatism and cold war-conditioning, and the interlocking mechanisms of her many layers. carolyn’s character (both her writing and shaw’s acting) are totally genius, but the main point im trying to raise here is that the parts of Mentor and Career Aspiration are inhabited by a woman, and 60yo woman going full-speed at that – not someone who’s barely 39 but treated as basically a retiree.

next, we’ve got carolyn’s boss, played by zoe wanamaker in 2x04. yes, she’s not in the show for long – although she may make a reappearance? not sure – but her value is more symbolic than anything. in her scene, we get the impression of her power (she gets to make carolyn wait :o), and while she’s also a severe older woman, she’s very much distinct from carolyn in personality, which is pretty unique; often, writers will prescribe bulk-identities to all their minor characters who fall into certain groups, out of a mix of laziness and ignorance. anyway, wanamaker’s helen is shown eating (another rant-worthy point is how the frequency and ease with which killing eve’s women are portrayed as actually eating food is tragically radical), and she lashes out at carolyn before soothing herself easily once again – she’s capricious and less reserved and measured than carolyn, but equally potent. we also get a strong vibe of a long and complex working relationship between these two, effortlessly implied by the writing and performance and even if we never double-back to it, it colours how we view carolyn and the system that i’ll (eventually) get around to making my argument about.

lastly, there’s julie, who plays the medical examiner in 2x01, and conducts the exhumation autopsy on allistair peel. she comes across as professional, capable, no-nonsense, but also warm and gallows-funny, hugging carolyn and sympathetic to eve’s slightly strange reaction to the corpse. like helen, she’s not in the show long, but it’s more her relevance as a symbol i want to discuss.

so what am i getting to by going on about carolyn and these relatively minor characters? well, i want to talk about how killing eve establishes for itself something of an ‘old girls’ club’. an ‘old boys’ club’ is the network of connections that form between (generally upperclass) men who went to the same schools or worked in the same companies, who get each other opportunities in a pay-it-forward kind of way throughout life; it’s one of the many ways that sites of privilege are maintained as sites of privilege. but with these older female characters, who all know and support each other, give each other second chances or off-the-books help, killing eve constructs its own version. through these interactions, we have the sense that carolyn is a part of a group of women across the government who ensure certain things happen at certain times for certain people.

even outside this senior boss ladies network, we have elena, eve and jess, who support and challenge and contradict each other – all successful women with different skillsets, trajectories, relationships, etc., and none of whom are white. not only does this show pass the bechdel test in under three minutes, but that conversation is between two women of colour. one of the many things i love about killing eve is that while it acknowledges (and even leverages) the disadvantages that marginalised groups face – e.g. villanelle is able to exploit conforming to the western ideals of femininity to lure men into a false sense of security; the ghost is able to pass through places unnoticed, etc. – it never makes that the core of the narrative. it isn’t focused on reinforcing these systemic barriers over and over, which is something a lot of shows do when they’re trying to be progressive, and all they end up doing is reminding us of the setbacks we face and how it’ll be a long, arduous struggle to improve things. instead, killing eve gives a nod to this sexist, racist, homophobic reality, but sidelines it, the way minorities are so often sidelined. rather than make all eve’s bosses and colleagues men “for the realism”, it throws a few male characters in there and then focuses on the women (look how much screentime kenny and hugo get compared to jess, another first-tier secondary character). it reimagines the chain of command as belonging to women, it takes power and allocates it how it sees fit. i adore this, because if someone said to the writers, “umm… i feel like there should be more men in charge… that’s just how it is…”, their response would probably be, “so what?” it wants to spend time with complex women in complex situations, so it just puts them there; there’s no spinning of the wheels to justify how so many women got to these high-ranking jobs in an institution designed to keep them in the lobby. it certainly never pretends women don’t have to cater to men and their sensibilities (take carolyn comforting frank in season 1), but it doesn’t get caught in ‘liberal’-dude-writer “look at these (skinny/pretty/fantasy-fulfillment) women push through the system and affect change from behind the scenes by showing their cleavage to *trick* men into doing what they want ;) girlpower, ladies”. it lets women BE the scene, unapologetically, without feeling pressed to explain or defend or negotiate by stuffing an equal number of male characters in. we get konstantin and aaron peel and various ambassadors or clerks who are men, but these are all characters on the outside looking in. killing eve isn’t arranging women as spaced out and in competition with each other; aside from villanelle, they’re all on the same side (and villanelle’s temporarily teamed up with them anyway), and they work together, while still being allowed internal tensions and clear relationships. i originally just intended to talk about how killing eve built us an old girls’ club, but i had More Thoughts, so that’s why this essay doesn’t stay totally on-thesis from here on, even though it is all about women and their positions in the narrative/workplace. another note – these women, for the most part, aren’t there to be love interests. we obviously have eve/villanelle, but they both have their own fully-developed characters, plus, their love interests are each other, not men. we have carolyn, but her affairs don’t control her storyline; they flit in and out, and are of far more signifiance to the men than to her – she’s an older woman who controls her sexuality, but doesn’t have any interest in letting it overtake her work (and we don’t have that ridiculous “uptight bitch learns to put relationship with basic bro above her lifelong career dream”). we have gemma, but while her narrative function is to give niko a final straw to leave, and to push eve further, she has agency in her arc; SHE is the one who pursues niko, and she does this in a respectable and understandable way. she’s not the “sexy temptress” who “lures” him away, and nor is she an “innocent” that he actively chases.

also, NONE of the women have their qualifications questioned. there is no “is carolyn experienced enough to have so much free reign?”, no “how did eve get to MI5?”. the way we’re always told to with male characters, the show expects us to accept that they’re fit for their roles. this is highlighted when eve kind of stumbles into being an authority on female assassins. she doesn’t have a phd in psych or anything, but she clearly has an affinity in her area, and she VERY quickly learns to own that. the first time carolyn calls her their resident expert, eve is a bit surprised, but then she’s just like, “huh, guess i am”, and runs with that confidence. these women are all tough, but they don’t have to dig out their own spaces. theyve got them, and the audience isn’t gently directed into wondering whether they actually should. we KNOW they should. unsurprisingly, considering much of killing eve is written/overseen by women, but this isn’t done for Woke Points. there’s no constant self-conscious grandstanding about how many women are in the series. the actors and writers talk about it in press, because theyre EXCITED, theyre THRILLED to finally have this, but that comes from a genuine place of joy to be involved in such a project, rather than a hapless grab for viewers. the female characters aren’t half-baked stocking-stuffers to net the 18-35W. theyre Actual Characters. bottom line is, isn’t it so nice? isn’t it so lovely to be watching something, and have women be in the foreground AND the background? to not have to smurfette effect, the “one of the main characters is a girl, can’t you just shut up now? smh so greedy”? to have minor female characters not as sexy set-dressing or rivals or “ew she’s ugly here’s what we don’t want our protagonist to be hahah amirite lads”? we get to see ourselves over and over, in so many different iterations. killing eve’s women aren’t just “empowered”, they HAVE POWER. they are in positions where they can use that power for good or bad or both, but they have sway and influence and we don’t have to watch a 22yo ingenue assimilate to a 98% male workplace. female characters in killing eve are REAL and PRESENT and we have an entire textured world that isn’t just modern, it’s extra-modern. we have our cake and eat it too: there are women throughout the workplace hierarchy but we still get a critique of how men manipulate the game, and both are managed expertly to ensure we get the social commentary AND get to enjoy the experience of watching women be intelligent and morally grey and sophisticated and manipulative and and AND. in conclusion, i will no longer be accepting applications from media that doesn’t have women in their cast because it “isnt realistic”. killing eve is tearing it up out there, and it’s almost overwhelmingly relieving to get to experience media like this.

*btw, im not trying to imply there are no women actually working at MI5. im sure there are many, but this is more a commentary on media interpretations (james bond, etc.), and the male dominated government landscape in general.

#killing eve #ke #killing eve s2 #killing eve season 2 #villainever #mine #villainever writes #villanelle #eve polastri #carolyn martens #ke analysis #villaneve #villanevest writes

398 notes · View notes

recentanimenews · 5 years

Text

Can the Eyes of Judgment Stand up to the Shadow of the Dragon of Dojima?

It can be a difficult thing to come out in the shadow of a larger, more well known sibling. The expectations, implications, and existing familiarity make it hard for the younger sibling to really shine on their own, as people fail to see it as an individual and instead view it as a copy of the thing they’re already familiar with. In this case, Judgment, the newest game from Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio, the team responsible for the Yakuza series, has a lot of expectations stacked up against it from the outset. Like Yakuza, it takes place in Kamurocho. Like Yakuza, it uses the Dragon Engine. And like Yakuza, it features a mixture of free roaming action, quest solving, diversions, and a deep, pulpy noir story featuring seedy criminal activities, gang members, murders, and twists and turns.

After 6 mainline games (and quite a few spin-offs and prequels), the Yakuza series has become a well established around the world, with Kazuma Kiryu becoming a recognizable icon in his own right. Needless to say, that leaves Judgment in an odd position: is Yakuza popular because of the gameplay, or is Yakuza popular because of the character of Kazuma Kiryu and other memorable characters like Majima? And is it even fair to compare the two of them, aside from their shared parentage of Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio and the Dragon Engine? Well, yes and no, so let’s get down to investigating this game on its own before we talk about its comparison to its big brother.

In Judgment, Takayuki Yagami is a former defense lawyer who, after a shocking turn of events, leaves the world of the courtroom to become a private detective. Three years after his change in careers, players assume the role of Yagami, as a series of serial killings targeting yakuza members drags Yagami’s sense of curiosity and justice into the mix. Judgment is set against the criminal justice backdrop of Japan’s modern criminal system, which carries a 99.9% conviction rate; fans of the Phoenix Wright series may be somewhat familiar with this number, as it too carries a lot of significance in the original series’ backdrop of courtroom drama. One of the most popular criminal dramas in Japan is similarly titled 99.9%, and the idea of defense lawyers defying the odds makes for good television by using the real and sometimes confusing statistic of Japan’s conviction rate as a crux. The twist in most fictional portrayals is that this system is unfair, harsh, or even corrupt, where prosecutors will go to any lengths to get the conviction they require.

No matter what, though, this not-quite-dystopian legal system serves as a great backdrop for noir crime drama, and sure enough Judgment takes advantage of that for the type of world it builds around Yagami. As Yagami finds himself going deeper and deeper into the mystery of “The Mole,” he’ll be required to investigate areas, pick locks, tail suspects, fly drones, and fight off unsavory criminals in his quest to uncover who the real murderer is and bring the case to a close, despite the potential danger it involves. Judgment’s strongest overall quality is its story, as the mystery narrative pulls you in and Yagami is an interesting protagonist, surrounded by equally interesting co-stars.

Gameplay in Judgment will likely be familiar to anyone who has played Yakuza, but in general you explore the city of Kamurocho in third person, going from location to location on foot as you search for clues, meet up with people, and as the game progresses, seek down side cases (this game’s version of the sub stories). Yagami’s base is his office, a place that allows you to decorate, recover health, play records you collect, take on jobs, and even play pinball. Of course, there are plenty of other diversions to partake in, such as visiting Club Sega locations to play emulated versions of games like Fighting Vipers, those infamous UFO Catchers, and even a unique twist on House of the Dead called Kamuro of the Dead! Judgment adds drone races to the mix, taking advantage of the fact that Yagami has a drone he uses for investigations, and a VR arcade with a slew of unique games that go beyond simple recreations of arcade games.

You’ll be able to pursue friendships with various NPCs in the game, ranging from people you meet during the story to clerks at your favorite stores, giving Judgment that slight RPG feeling that the Yakuza games have always had. Instead of focusing on your character (which you can upgrade with Skill Points), your major goal in these side events is to raise your city reputation, allowing you to take on more and more side cases as the game progresses. Perhaps even better than Yakuza, these quests make some actual sense for Yagami to engage in; as a private detective, he takes on almost any job, which gives a nice sense of realism to the proceedings.

Of course no matter where Yagami goes, conflict is likely to follow, so it may come as no surprise that the game features quite a bit of combat. Unlike Kiryu or even Majima, Yagami is a relatively slight man, and his combat tends to focus on the fact that he needs speed and agility over brute strength. He has two combat modes that he can switch between, one that serves to help against large groups of enemies, and another that is better suited for one-on-one fights. He also gets a unique wall run set of moves that allow him to use sprinting momentum to launch off walls and attack enemies with various abilities. As he fights, he builds off his EX gauge, which allows you to use various finisher style moves on enemies, and as you level up, even gives you things like ways to attack while downed, or react to various enemy attacks by spending EX meter.

Of all the Yakuza games, I felt that this system reminded me the most of Kiwami 1 and Kiwami 2, but I did find that I have some small issues with Judgment’s combat. Locking on to an enemy by holding the R1 button is a somewhat nebulous act, and can even feel like you aren’t even doing it; but if you don’t, you can’t use dodge moves at all, meaning that the essential requirement of using 2 button presses to dodge becomes awkward. Blocking is done with the L1 button, meaning that you have to be aware that in combat, in order to react to the enemy, you’ll need to be ready to defend with L1, or R1 + X to dodge.

There are some of the weird Dragon Engine flaws that popped up in Kiwami 2 as well, with Yagami occasionally getting caught on scenery, which in one instance caused me to take Mortal Wounds from a boss as I couldn’t escape being stuck on a random decorative item in the area. These were minor in my playthrough, but I had hoped that the developers would maybe have ironed out those janky combat issues by the time Judgment released. One of the interesting changes is that Yagami does not store any weapons (I’m quite sad about this fact), meaning that unless you pick up random items (hello, bicycles!), you’re stuck with your bare fists for all combat situations. I also noticed that the usual collection of random items are available to use in battles, but in some instances of closed locations, like in an office, all of them were quickly destroyed by the ragdoll system, turning arenas like this into big, empty rooms.

Perhaps the biggest thing that sets Judgment apart from Yakuza is the detective aspects. The story of the game is quite interesting, and the way the player is asked to investigate tasks does make it feel like a procedural drama more than a crime drama, which helps in establishing a reason to view this game as its own entity. However, these types of sequences can be somewhat slow. While I took some time to explore the city and engage in some activities as they opened, the first chapter of the game took nearly 6 hours to complete, and proper side cases don’t even become available until the second chapter.

The Yakuza games do have a history of getting progressively bigger, and Judgment has some of that as well. You can likely expect to rack up around 70 hours in this game if you try to do everything like I did, and probably hit 50 hours if you solely focus on the story and do minimal side cases. Speed is not your friend in Judgment, and at times I found the game to be excessively talky, surprised by how much of the game was actually filled with characters talking to one another. In reflection, I would have to say that at least 50%, if not more, of the 6 hours I played of Chapter 1 was all talking.

Judgment is by far a more narrative game than its siblings, and while many of them had long and developed plotlines, Judgment puts heavy focus on narrative over everything else, which is not as negative as it sounds. Instead, you are given a very good sense of who these characters are, what’s happening, and why you should care about them. I found Yagami to be a particularly refreshing protagonist when compared to Kiryu and Majima; Yagami is a man who tried to play it straight and do his best as a lawyer, only to have that dream destroyed, with the past constantly haunting him. When compared to Kiryu, Yagami feels far more complex, a cynical and wry man whose dreams and ideas of the world have been shattered, but who still has a strong sense of justice burning under that cynicism. It would be fair to say that he’s almost far less charismatic than Kiryu as well, and comes off as almost unlikeable in certain instances; this isn’t a man fighting by any supposed code of honor, but instead a man trying to find purpose after the events he continues to blame himself for.

Yagami’s character depth is perhaps the strongest element of Judgment, and the reason that I enjoyed it despite some of my initial misgivings about how plot heavy it really is. While some of the investigation missions get tiring (the tailing missions especially), I constantly wanted to find out what was going to happen next. Judgment succeeds on the one part it really needed to land: the noir crime mystery story it tells. Yagami’s search for the truth, if not redemption, is fleshed out over the chapters of this game perfectly. If you’re a fan of mysteries or crime procedurals, there is a lot to love in Judgment, and the game even features difficulty options that allow you to focus solely on the narrative, a feature I really appreciated in retrospect after playing the game. While I enjoy the challenge of the Yakuza games, I think the fact that people who just want to experience Judgment’s story will get that option, as the easier difficulty options also affect some of the minigames like picking locks.

Comparing this game to Yakuza is pretty obvious, but a lot of the time I spent with Judgment made me think of the time I’ve spent with the Phoenix Wright games or L.A. Noire as well, and I appreciate that the developers tried to accommodate as many people as possible with these options. Yagami himself does a lot of the heavy lifting here too, as he’s a deeply flawed character who punishes himself far more than he needs to, leading him to make relatively obvious mistakes in judgment; perhaps one of the best aspects of a good noir crime story is a flawed protagonist seeking something, and Yagami really fulfills that role completely, perhaps even better than Cole, the protagonist of L.A. Noire. The game itself is fairly lax when it comes to choices, too, as it will generally steer you into the right answer, and there were never really any options that would take you down the wrong path or affect the story outcome. You’re more along for the ride here than you are making the decisions for where the story goes, which for the sake of how these games generally play, I found totally fine.

Those who know me are aware that I’m into Yakuza BIG TIME. After my partner talked me into playing Yakuza 0 when it was released on the PS4, I completely fell in love with the series. I’m currently on a long quest to play and stream all of the Yakuza games (I’m on Yakuza 3 at the moment), and it’s been a hell of a journey. The story, the drama, the characters, and my goodness, the ACTION! It was all wrapped in a perfect package that was a true joy to unwrap. I have to admit that when I first started playing Judgment, I was still thinking that I was going to play yet another Yakuza game, and when it wasn’t, it caught me off-guard. And that’s okay, because Judgment is its own thing in its own style; the game, despite also being set in Kamurocho, has plenty of unique appeal to it along with its charming cast of characters, like Kaito. I found myself getting more and more absorbed into the story and characters that the game had to offer.

When it comes to reviewing Judgment, I think there are two main questions to answer. The first is: “Does it stand up against the shadow of Kazuma Kiryu and the Yakuza games?”, which I believe yes, it does. You’ll find enough to enjoy here if you love those games, despite the narrative differences, but players who have never tried Yakuza at all should find this a great way to perhaps give the genre a chance without having to worry about all the baggage. The second question is: “Does this game succeed on its own as a crime noir mystery game?”, to which my answer is… mostly. The game is generally solid in this regard, with a great story and unique characters, but at times the game just takes far too long to get to the meat of the story. The pacing either needed to be faster, or the story more directly told, instead of wandering around Kamurocho back and forth between ever changing destinations.

That said, I think Judgment is a fantastic game that fans of Yakuza, Phoenix Wright, or crime dramas will enjoy. It may not have the history of its older sibling, and Yagami is certainly no Kiryu, but he is his own person, with his own cast of characters and stories to tell. And personally I’d love to see a second game in the series take us on even more adventures with Yagami solving mysteries, flying drones, and taking pictures of random stray cats, and I think you will too after playing through Judgment!

REVIEW ROUNDUP

+ Builds on the Yakuza franchise to establish its own flavor of story and characters.

+ Yagami is a unique and interesting protagonist that really carries the game on his back.

+ Variable difficulty lets players of any level enjoy the fantastic noir story here.

+/- Game can be slow and occasionally devolves into running back and forth on the map.

+/- While there is plenty of fun stuff to do, some of it just isn’t very interesting to do after a while.

- There are some frankly tired depictions of sexual harassment that women deal with here that seem to serve little purpose in the game other than being used for comic relief or to establish that bad people are bad.

Is this your first trip to Kamurocho, or are you a die-hard Yakuza fan? What’s your favorite part of Judgment? Let us know what you think of the game in the comments!

----

Nicole is a features writer and editor for Crunchyroll. Known for punching dudes in Yakuza games on her Twitch channel while professing her love for Majima. She also has a blog, Figuratively Speaking. Follow her on Twitter: @ellyberries

Do you love writing? Do you love anime? If you have an idea for a features story, pitch it to Crunchyroll Features!

By: [email protected]

#Anime #News #Latest in Anime News by Crunchyroll!

1 note · View note

autoirishlitdiscourses · 7 years

Text

Discourse of Sunday, 10 December 2017

Remember that you may have noticed that the absolute minimum standards for a late paper. The example that mostly don't change the meaning of the section eventually, and showing that you find helpful, I want to examine your thoughts might be possible if you happen to have a handout by 10 am to avoid explicating yourself as the source of a novel in 1994, called Einstein's Dreams, which was distributed during our first section meeting. There are a number of ways, and you've done a lot of ways that I didn't foresee at the last half of your skull with the group as a good job digging in to, I'll have them. You don't necessarily think that the exceptions is always patronizing, in a lot of material, and would like you. Again, this is what you most need to confirm that the paper assignment include a historical narrative is fundamentally very fair in a variety of issues that I've gestured in margin comments are often articulated in the West of Ireland, regardless of the contracting party is entitled Samuel Beckett: The Dubliners perform The Patriot Game, mentioned in that part of the Western World? You added a just in line 21; and changed Mrs Nooge to Mrs Nugent I said in class, that one of the quarter by 1. I definitely will this coming Sunday night, it has to it, in your position, I grade you received is not inherently bad, but students who can and must be eight to ten minutes with it, because that will help you to lift you naturally into the text. Hi! Thanks! You really have done. I'm thinking of a particular point by way of discussion. All nineteen students registered for that matter, with answers and notes on usage of the course. To put it another way, though, you might notice Bloom's interest in the quarter by ⅓ of the section guidelines handout, which would be unwise simply to wait longer after asking a lot of ways in which he or she is working, may be asking a question is a difficult business and requires a historical document might be exactly, are the issues that you need to back up your more Faulknerian paragraphs into smaller questions: What do you see as being not a great holiday break!

Personally, I offer you to open up discussions on their write-up final on Wednesday. Again, you should look at some point for virtually everyone after graduation. I occasionally feel that it would also require the professor's miss three sections and have sophisticated and deserve to be over. So I'd like. You take on the section Happy Thanksgiving, everyone is always patronizing, in fact, if you found the poem and its background. Think about what the boss and I expect that your relative weighting involves/making more productive question is a wise topic to do so, but it should I said to me, for the last sentence. Feel better soon. But these are huge abstractions, and did an excellent Thanksgiving and that what you are interested in plunging deeper into the heart of what overall trajectory your paper, if you'd compressed your initial discussion a bit in the third and thirteenth lines of poetry into music and is unacceptable. I think that interrogating the metaphor's utility as a whole. All in all, you've done so far of people aren't prepared, it's not too late to pick out the issues that you've got a good narrative path through your selection on pp. You should take a direct, personal interest in is tracing out connections between the Irish as postcolonial subjects; probably others that you need to reschedule after the midterm structure section 1:30-3:30 and will not necessarily mean that you follow that up by a single person. Yeats assigned for Thursday although note that discussion notes here but not participating a very limited number/of your finals and activities! There are probably many ways to relate Ulysses to cubism as the being taken care of yourself, and how would his readers have understood these attitudes when the hmm, he never claims that you're scheduled to recite and discuss can be difficult for your paper and for me to say, there is a good choice I've heard, and made a big paperwork headache. You also picked a rather difficult passage, in the paper itself. Too, your readings further and develop a topic of Irishness, and reschedule would be do reduce the number that you picked to the stage, your writing is clear and engaging, overall.

Excellent! Thinking about crashing? I appreciate that you're constructing—I think that this means is that you can point to these comparatively minor grammatical and formatting issues—these minor errors, mostly omissions, while also having a full schedule this week has basically evaporated I'll put you ahead of the harder things to say in here, and your readings, and I think that you'll want to pursue their own identities: not only help you to talk. All in all, obligate you to push your readings of Butcher Boy, you'd just need to have mercilessly restructured around that observation. That is why young children, and went above and beyond the length requirement for papers are penalized by one letter and a bit abstract, all of your finals and papers, and you related your discussion. So, you currently have just over 87% in the play, that's my reading, but if you'd like, since it just so that you need to take so long to get into it, and I'll keep a copy of Ulysses? Your historical narrative is fair to the section this quarter, so I did to so I can't be more than merely plausible, which pulled the grades up. Feeling sad. That's all!

Etc. In the same names to denote the same number of points that are both pretty close to my sections for English 150, the upshot is that there's a chance to check for the paper is neither foolish nor improper, but they can also break into how the texts you're working with—you do so at least 86% on the length requirements. Excellent! Let me know what you want to tell her. Think outside the church in Punishment; and by only an hour or so, how do we define what each grade is 50 9 for 5 in the play. So you can go up and doing the assignment and subsumes them into a sophisticated move. If you can't get to everything anyway, because that would help you to section. Since you're interested explicitly in connections between McCabe's use of stream of consciousness in the class and kicked the topic's rear end. That is, but that's not necessarily that you'll need to be a difficult selection, and you've actually managed to introduce a large group of graduate students who can and must not look at the end of the exchange rate between the texts you're working, rather than an analysis.

I feel that you don't already know where it is a very good work here. Explains the currency system in use and the rusted poison did corrode his blood the way he never claims that unreciprocated love is bitter and mysterious, and change your texts; it sounds, because they will be able to use concrete language whenever you don't show up. However, you could say so, right now.

Think about how you're using based on everything except for the difficulties that Stephen has with Irish nationalism, for the symbol. You dropped or from the rest of the landscape to notions related to gender. Think about what the relationship between the various ways to make sure that you're perhaps reading more into the discussion that followed, or at least one fundamental problem that I would like to. Marcus Lamb reading An Spailpín Fánach: 7 Charts That Show Just How Bad Things Are For Young People via HuffPostBiz Welcome to the poem and its background.

I'll just have to do. Answers to your query, but you were waiting for the conservative fans of the landscape itself, making little or no and close off further discussion. As for your patience.

I'll most likely remember it myself. It's often that the sooner you reply, the bird this touches on things that would be the song. I am willing to give a textually perfect recitation that is necessary to do is to say that sometimes sitting down and start writing to get to everything anyway, especially if the section hits its average level of familiarity with the recitation assignment write-up call. In my own favorite parts from that part of a group means that you contribute meaningfully to the concept itself and to become more specific about your paper is not a three-syllable metrical foot, accented-unaccented. Excellent! Talk in section. Try thinking about how you can carry yourself, then send me the URL and I'll see you next week so that you might notice Bloom's interest in is the case. You did a very sophisticated and deserve to portray themselves in the future will help you be interested in similar research areas, and the very end of the soul, freedom, the Resource Center for Sexual and Gender Diversity, or by email or stop by my office door SH 2432E, provided that what you want to discuss. Alternately, you gave a very good work here, and I've gone ahead and cancel the add period and how does this imagined switch in perspective tell us anything about the ever-recurring celebration of the text you do not feel comfortable speaking with a perfect score on section 3 were all over the line. Again, this is absolutely a suggestion for how you're phrasing a claim in your thesis statement, and I believe strongly that you engage. My Way Reminder: Wednesday is a weaker assertion that you're arguing for a good student and I think that talking a bit rushed and ran a bit nervous, but you already have a good selection and have decided to go this coming weekend. You Are Old. Organizing your discussion and question provoked close readings. Thought for the professor's signature on a specific point, but really, I guess you could take Playboy as a section on 27 November and 4: General Thoughts and Notes 13 November is good for your performance. Have a good job. Short link to the section as a whole, though. You are perfectly capable of being fair to Yeats's text, and your presence in front of the section for a job well done! If you are perfectly capable of doing so. I take my pedagogical responsibilities seriously, and what he had lived.

I'm looking forward to your ultimate conversational goals. In my own reaction would be productive, particularly if you have either made arrangements with me. One way to think about intermediate or preparatory questions that you want to make room for the jugular. All in all, you did so quite gracefully, actually, because you won't have time to get 5/5, and a departure from your generally high standard of interpretation. Answers the question of whose thoughts are more interesting ones, and different societies mean very different. Here are my comments on it. Can't read margin comments. I hope you won't have time to think, too. TA during tests; please ensure that you email the professor to ensure that you are from the horrors of the recording of his guitar and vocal performance is also a Ulysses recitation tomorrow. I'm sorry to take so long to get to everything anyway, or alternate comparable relationships that replace or supplement them, but there are potentially benefits to both of them. Whoops! Let me know. You are welcome. Your notes are posted here; but if anything gets covered in the class if there are certainly other possibilities. Let me know, and that has to it, and you should put it another way, OK? I think that there will be an impressive move, and Stephen is also true, but rather that you are working. Remember that you are, in large part because it's specific and nuanced interpretation—I've really enjoyed having you in section this quarter, then you have any questions arise sufficiently far in advance what you should make sure that you're painfully aware of these are comparatively minor errors.

#Irish literature #automatically generated text #Patrick Mooney #Python #Markov chains

0 notes