i feel very frustrated about the trend of giving chil body hair bc if it was any other anime twink i would be thrilled its just that it seems to only be because people are SO afraid of him looking young they have to make him hairy to justify liking him in ships.
meanwhile it does directly go against canon (he literally is supposed to look like a child. this is integral to both his character and his race's lore as a whole and it makes no damn sense that he would be mistaken for a child if he has body hair i mean. cmon.)
and it's like. some men are hairless. some men look young. when youre a trans man in your 20s-30s its especially common to be mistaken for a teenager, even more so if you're not on t. and short. these traits do not make you less of a man or an adult. :/
so I've got some In Stars and Time thoughts. spoilers up to act 3 I think. I'm on pause as we SPEAK.
1. mirabelle my beloved. I love her story re: romance and how she Doesn't Want It but feels forced to have it and, loving her religion so much, just can't fathom leaving it for JUST THAT even though it makes her so uncomfortable and feel so bad. like I love the resolution tbh with how Siffrin just sort of tells her to Change by Changing the tradition instead of by forcing herself into it, the way she once told him housemaidens did sometimes (if re: clothes in that instance). it's just really cute.
2. I also love how you can kind of make a contrast between her not wanting to change bc she's so happy the way she is and this conflicting with her Change beliefs, and Isa joining the House of Change because he WANTED to change; Mira is happy with herself/at odds with the House's traditions, and Isa is at odds with himself/happy following the House's traditions.
also cis aroace/trans allo lmao
3. I SWEAR TO GOD I'M SIMULTANEOUSLY PUSHED BY THE URGE TO COMPLETE THE GAME ROMANCE INCLUDED, AND MY COMPLETE AND UTTER DISGUST OF ROMANCE BEING DIRECTED AT ME/THE GUY I'M PLAYING AS. EVERY TIME I'M ALONE WITH ISABEAU I'M SHAKING WITH FEAR HE'LL GO ALL ROMANCEY ON SIFFRIN AND I'LL JUST HAVE TO PAINSTAKINGLY SIT THROUGH IT AND MAYBE EVEN SAY YES. I'D GO INSANE. compulsion to avoid romance vs compulsion to absorb all gameplay available. immovable object vs unstoppable force. fight
4. i don't think the head housemaiden is a real person within the game. either that or she's responsible for the time loops and even the king. and definitely the island. I can feel at least one of these things is true in my BONES. she's just too nice and too respected with too much authority. and also she didn't fight the king herself which is a red flag.
but we'll see I guess! I'm really liking the game thus far. might even draw about it
I won’t lie, still not an editor, but damn Remus is kinda fun to edit- that and I also wanted to give y’all SOMETHING instead of just tv static bc my iPad shat itself- so have another goofy Remus edit! (This one didn’t eat my storage as badly as the other one I had planned BAHAHAHA-)
Kaeya is rather touch averse, cringing away from casual contact people give him under the guise of being distracted or idle movement. He's used to it, the Ragnvindrs and Adenlinde got him used to frequent affectionate physical contact, but it can still be entirely Uncomfortable if he's touched by someone outside those he is close to or someone he's otherwise Allowed to touch him.
okay genuine question especially for those who had their wisdom tooth extracted or even have some experiences with it, how do you realized that you had a wisdom tooth being grown out and how you experienced the discomfort of it?
The discomfort of not eating all day bc you don't feel good and have no appetite vs the discomfort of viscerally feeling your digestion after eating a scoop of mashed potatoes and gravy
Eh, I’m annoyed so I’ll say it on main: Dogs may be man’s best friend but guess what? They’re also dangerous!
Socially, we love and accept dogs, but any perception of harmlessness probably comes from the fact that a) we see dogs as universally lovable and human-loving and therefore unwilling to harm people, b) we expect dogs to be trainable and to need to be taught rules, c) we only see specific dogs or specific breeds as “problem” dogs, and d) we excuse harm or mess that dogs engage in because “they didn’t mean it” or “they’re not usually like this.”
Because guess what? Dogs have claws. Blunter than cats, but they still have ‘em. If they jump on you, they can scratch you. If they’re big and they jump on you, they can knock you over. More than that, dogs have teeth and can have very strong jaws capable of causing major injury. When they’re young, they often play by biting things. If your hand gets in their mouth, they will also bite you because it takes practice and developmental coordination for them to know to bite softly or to avoid your hand instead of the toy in it. No, most pet dogs don’t want to hurt you! But that doesn’t erase their capability.
Other dog behaviors that we make light of or accept rather than seeing as a “species-wide character flaw” the way we do with cats include chasing things/people and barking at unfamiliar, interesting, annoying, or threatening things. These are not moral behaviors any more than a cat messing with a christmas tree is done to spite you, specifically. But to be honest, they “feel” dangerous to me regardless of how many times a dog’s owner says “oh, he’s not usually like this!” or “oh, he’s being naughty!” or “oh, he didn’t mean it.” Meanwhile, a not-so-scary quiet and still dog might be very dangerous but seem calm and fine.
It’s on me to get over my discomfort around dogs, but it would be great if we acknowledged that dogs can actually be quite scary for people, and that those fears may be unfounded in the case of this specific dog that barks or chases but has been trained not to hurt, while they may be perfectly be grounded in reality when it comes to other dogs, and I have very little way of knowing how much I can trust your dog to respect my boundaries! You, as someone not uncomfortable around dogs, might not be the best judge of how comfortable others might be. And I don’t just mean maligned breeds, I also mean the “friendly” kinds of dogs like golden retrievers or labs.
Dogs can make great pets. They can also be a nuisance once they’re bigger than a housecat and have a lot more energy than their owners anticipated (don’t buy a puppy unless also you’re willing to work with an adolescent and care for an adult). Dogs are also capable of causing major injury, harm, or property damage, especially if not trained and socialized. They can also be scary without being harmful, or be dangerous while seeming innocuous. People can also do a great deal of harm by trying to “train” dogs without respecting their nature as a living being, e.g. physically punishing them when they do very regular dog things (so, you shouldn’t expect to train a dog out of being a dog, such as to never, ever bark or never, ever chew anything ever, or never need a walk). These are all statements that can coexist.
Sometimes I wish I could just pop my jaw off and spray some WD-40 where the hinges are supposed to be because man sometimes (but rarely) does it bug me.