Tumgik
Text
You gotta give props to Mads Mikkelsen for playing such a pretentious character who constantly talks in metaphors because I know for a fact he didn’t understand at least half of what he was saying, but still slayed that role so hard
17K notes · View notes
Text
im on a quest to create the perfect hot chocolate recipe for this Christmas and I want to do it from scratch, dont want to go down the hershey's/cadbury's hot chocolate powder route. there was this one hot chocolate I had in Melbourne when I was 10 and I have been trying to recreate that ever since. help me by dropping your recipes/family's ways of making hot chocolate I want it to be hashtag special.
0 notes
Text
this is so true though. think of all the responses to the show You as well being like "if I were there", like baby girl,,,,,
those of us who felt hatred or a sense of "how fucking stupid and ignorant and blind and gullible could you be???" while watching Alana bloom in Hannibal is very. reminiscent of how on some level, a small part of EVERYONE likes to believe that if they were ever in close contact w a serial killer without their knowing, they would be spared because they are "special" and would be able to bring some unique side of him that other victims don't. or like to think that they wouldn't be "as oblivious as the other victims" because they are somehow "smarter" and have a keen unique eye for signs "unlike" others.
but I do think a small part of all of us believes that if the worst of serial killers somehow fell in love with us, we would be spared. and we would be "chosen" to stay alive due to some innate uniqueness in us that would "bring out" some softness in the killer that "others can't."
thoughts?
56 notes · View notes
Text
those of us who felt hatred or a sense of "how fucking stupid and ignorant and blind and gullible could you be???" while watching Alana bloom in Hannibal is very. reminiscent of how on some level, a small part of EVERYONE likes to believe that if they were ever in close contact w a serial killer without their knowing, they would be spared because they are "special" and would be able to bring some unique side of him that other victims don't. or like to think that they wouldn't be "as oblivious as the other victims" because they are somehow "smarter" and have a keen unique eye for signs "unlike" others.
but I do think a small part of all of us believes that if the worst of serial killers somehow fell in love with us, we would be spared. and we would be "chosen" to stay alive due to some innate uniqueness in us that would "bring out" some softness in the killer that "others can't."
thoughts?
56 notes · View notes
Text
one thing about me is i can excuse basically any crime if you serve enough cunt. murder, piracy, arson, cannibalism, theft, all of that is ok for me if you’re real sexy about it. i have a purely vibes-based morality system
24K notes · View notes
Text
I was talking to my friend who has been going through a hard time and after ltrly listing every horrible thing that's been happening to him at work, school, family, etc. - after CLEARLY recognising what are the agents contributing to his current feelings, he goes "I don’t know, maybe I’m just exaggerating all of this and it’s just in my head."
,,,,,,GIRL
and that's when I started thinking- why is “it being in your head” immediately correlated with it “not being real enough” as though only whatever is observable outside your head is real? Whatever is “In your head” is a direct response to whatever is happening “outside” so it is logically impossible for you to be exaggerating it.
If what’s “in your head” seems exaggerated then that means your circumstances outside your head are exaggerated versions of insanity in themselves. Enough of gaslighting yourself into thinking what you "think" or "feel" may not be real or AS REAL as everything "outside", these things don't function in mutually exclusive vacuums.
3 notes · View notes
Text
Palestine poetry: We teach life, sir.
Today, my body was a TV’d massacre.
Today, my body was a TV’d massacre that had to fit into sound-bites and word limits.
Today, my body was a TV’d massacre that had to fit into sound-bites and word limits filled enough with statistics to counter measured response.
And I perfected my English and I learned my UN resolutions.
But still, he asked me, Ms. Ziadah, don’t you think that everything would be resolved if you would just stop teaching so much hatred to your children?
Pause.
I look inside of me for strength to be patient but patience is not at the tip of my tongue as the bombs drop over Gaza.
Patience has just escaped me.
Pause. Smile.
We teach life, sir.
Rafeef, remember to smile.
Pause.
We teach life, sir.
We Palestinians teach life after they have occupied the last sky.
We teach life after they have built their settlements and apartheid walls, after the last skies.
We teach life, sir.
But today, my body was a TV’d massacre made to fit into sound-bites and word limits.
And just give us a story, a human story.
You see, this is not political.
We just want to tell people about you and your people so give us a human story.
Don’t mention that word “apartheid” and “occupation”.
This is not political.
You have to help me as a journalist to help you tell your story which is not a political story.
Today, my body was a TV’d massacre.
How about you give us a story of a woman in Gaza who needs medication?
How about you?
Do you have enough bone-broken limbs to cover the sun?
Hand me over your dead and give me the list of their names in one thousand two hundred word limits.
Today, my body was a TV’d massacre that had to fit into sound-bites and word limits and move those that are desensitized to terrorist blood.
But they felt sorry.
They felt sorry for the cattle over Gaza.
So, I give them UN resolutions and statistics and we condemn and we deplore and we reject.
And these are not two equal sides: occupier and occupied.
And a hundred dead, two hundred dead, and a thousand dead.
And between that, war crime and massacre, I vent out words and smile “not exotic”, “not terrorist”.
And I recount, I recount a hundred dead, a thousand dead.
Is anyone out there?
Will anyone listen?
I wish I could wail over their bodies.
I wish I could just run barefoot in every refugee camp and hold every child, cover their ears so they wouldn’t have to hear the sound of bombing for the rest of their life the way I do.
Today, my body was a TV’d massacre
And let me just tell you, there’s nothing your UN resolutions have ever done about this.
And no sound-bite, no sound-bite I come up with, no matter how good my English gets, no sound-bite, no sound-bite, no sound-bite, no sound-bite will bring them back to life.
No sound-bite will fix this.
We teach life, sir.
We teach life, sir.
We Palestinians wake up every morning to teach the rest of the world life, sir.
- Rafeef Ziadah, Palestinian poet and human rights activist.
933 notes · View notes
Text
The Palestine Reader
The following is a collection of articles, essays, and books on Palestine. These are not introduction texts to the question of Palestine or the Palestinain-Israeli “conflict”. If you need one read The Palestine-Israel Conflict by Gregory Harms and Todd Fery. Further, this is not an “unbiased” or “neutral” readng list. Everything listed below is counter-hegemonic. I feel absolutely no need to provide anything from the Zionist or Israeli point-of-view when that is the dominant narrative. With that said, I believe this provides a diverse, but in no means comprehensive, overview of the discourse on Palestine. A continuously updated page of this list can be found here.
On Theory
Orientalism by Edward Said
Orientalism Reconsidered by Edward Said
The Question of Palestine by Edward Said
Reading Said in Hebrew by Ella Shohat
Notes on the “Post-Colonial” by Ella Shohat
On History
History of Palestine by Dr. Mohsen Mohammed Saleh
Sabra and Shatila: September 1982 by Bayan Nuwayhed al-Hout
Peace and its Discontents by Edward Said
On Being Palestinian
What It Means to be Palestinian by Dina Matar
A Narrative of Palestinian Dispossession by Samia Costandi
The Palestinian Exile as Writer by Jabra I. Jabra
My People Shall Live by Leila Khaled
Memoirs, 1948 Part I by Fauzi Al-Qawuqji
Memoirs, 1948 Part II
Palestinian Identity and the Performance of Catastrophe by Ihab Saloul
On Zionism
Zionism from the Standpoint of its Victims by Edward Said
Zionism from the Standpoint of its Jewish Victims by Ella Shohat
Jewishness and the Critique of Zionism by Judith Butler
The Invention of the Mizrahim by Ella Shohat
Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky
Jewish History, Jewish Religion by Israel Shahak
The Ends of Zionism by Joseph Massad
The Persistence of the Palestinian Question by Joseph Massad
On Imperialism and Settler Colonialism in West Asia by Jamil Hilal
The Hidden History of Zionism by Ralph Schoenman
How the Zionists Took Over Palestine by Adel Safty
Imperial Israel and the Palestinians by Nur Masalha
After Zionism by Antony Loewenstein and Ahmed Moor
On the Holocaust
Respecting the Holocaust by Howard Zinn
The Holocaust: Learning the Wrong Lessons by Boaz Evron
The Victimhood of the Powerful by Jennifer Peto
On Media
Propaganda, Perception, and Reality by William A. Cook
Israeli Cinema an interview with Ella Shohat
Israeli Cinema by Ella Shohat
Palestinian Cinema by Nurith Gertz and George Khleifi
On Al Nakba
The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Ilan Pappe
The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Ilan Pappe
The Saga of Deir Yassin
The Fall of Lydda by Spiro Munayyer
Returning to Kafr Bir'im
How Palestine became Israel by Stephen Hallbrook
The Palestinian Exodus of 1948 by Simha Flapan
Why Did the Palestinians Leave by Walid Khalidi
Selected Documents on 1948
The Limits of the New Israeli History by Joel Beinin
On Genocide
Genocide or Erasure of Palestinians by Kathleen and Bill Christison
Israel’s Slow-Motion Genocide in Occupied Palestine by Steve Lendman
Ongoing Palestinian Genocide by Gideon Polya
The Lessons of Violence by Chris Hedges
The Brutal Siege of Gaza Can Only Breed Violence by Karen Koning AbuZayd
The Olive Trees of Palestine Weep by Sonja Karkar
Slouching toward a Palestinian Holocaust by Richard Falk
Gaza is Dying by Patrick Cockburn
Israeli Immunity for Genocide by Andrea Howard
Palestinian Misery in Perspective by Paul De Rooij
A Slow, Steady Genocide an interview with Tanya Reinhart
Gaza’s Holocaust by Dr. Elias Akleh
Genocide Hides Behind Expulsion by Adi Ophir
The British in Palestine, A Conveniently Forgotten Holocaust by Robert Fisk
European Collusion in Israel’s Slow Genocide by Omar Barghouti
Genocide in Gaza by Ilan Pappe
Genocide Among Us by Curtis F. J. Doebbler
Bleaching the Attrocities of Genocide by Kim Petersen
The Rape of Palestine by William A. Cook
Israel Plots Another Palestinian Exodus by Jonathan Cook
Slow Motion Ethnic Cleansing by Uri Avnery
Disappearing Palestine by Jonathan Cook
The Problem With Israel by Jeff Halper
Gaza in Crisis by Noam Chomsky and Ilan Pappe
Drying Out the Palestinians
Israel’s Latest Assault on Gaza by Norman Finkelstein
To Gaza I Did Not Go by Gideon Levy
Gaza, the World’s Largest Open-Air Prison by Noam Chomsky
The Most Humane Little Checkpoint by Amira Hass
On BDS
BDS: Winning Justice for the Palestinian People
Why Boycott Israeli Universities?
The Necessity of Cultural Boycott by Ilan Pappe
Companies Supporting Israeli Occupation
On Solutions
Two-State Illusion by Ian S. Lustick
Relative Humanity: The Essential Obstacle to a One-State Solution by Omar Barghouti
Where Now For Palestine? by Jamil Hilal
22K notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
19K notes · View notes
Text
I am only alive when the people who fund genocides around the world stamp a seal on a piece of paper
I am alive because they have declared and confirmed that i am not lying about my death
A death which needs their seal too
But not the kind they stamp everyday to fund murders that they then declare real through their legal documents
One seal to welcome me into the glass ceiling
One seal to break me free from it
Two certificates denote my transient existence in time
Declared by another transient power force who are deluded by their immortality
Two certificates to tell the world i did not lie about living
I did not fake my death
Out of greed to continue reaping the
benefits of the glass ceiling
But it doesnt exist because it doesnt have a birth or death certificate
Only a license to kill.
Two certificates to tell the world i did not lie about living
I did not fake my death
Out of yearning to continue exploiting the
benefits of the face of the seal that declares i live that also declares to kill those they deem deserving not of
Certificates and confirmations
Your life is not worth being confirmed.
If your certificate is refused to be sealed,
Your fate is.
A life confined within power structures we rebel against
A proof i need to show if i want to
Receive a vaccination so as to not die
For which i need proof again
A proof i need to show if i want to put a roof above my head
If i want to marry the man i love
Only a man
A proof i need to show if i want a degree
Which is another proof i need if i want a job
Which is another proof i need if i want respect
Which is another proof i am told i need to lead a dignified life
And what is the proof of that life?
my breath does not suffice
I need to be authenticated by old men in power
“Yes, you were born. You are alive”
Only to turn into a statistic when i die.
0 notes
Text
Tumblr media
— Mandy Shunnarah
484 notes · View notes
Text
A series of poems from Palestine, curated by the poet and translators Fady Joudah and Lena Tuffaha.
4K notes · View notes
Text
There's a plentiful supply of nature and ecology writers that criticize "Anthropocentrism" and tell readers that we shouldn't consider ourselves more important than other life forms, and then they write things that are like "We evolved to live in Nature in a Natural environment...Long ago humans lived as hunter-gatherers instead of farming and domesticating animals...But when civilization was created, man unnaturally subjugated and modified plants and animals...Bringing them under human control for his own benefit...Man replaces natural ecosystems with artificially created "post-natural" environments...Now humans live in an unnatural environment that is separated from Nature...and i'm like buddy. do you even hear yourself
Since I have access to a bigger library now, I've explored "deep ecology" and "green anarchism" and "Biocentrism" a bit more and what i've seen is still kinda silly. The writers have very thoughtful theory and philosophy of diverse subjects relating to morality, society, power, and liberation, but...they just don't know very much about Nature.
I mean several things by that: first, they're not clear on the boring, practical details of things like food systems and the way construction alters ecosystems, second, they don't try to clearly define what "nature" is, and third, they act like "nature" has a clear definition anyway.
Now nature is pretty much undefinable anyway, a couple possible definitions are "all things that exist, have existed, or are possible in the universe" and "the thing that a forest has that a parking lot doesn't." You can say "biodiversity," but every space has biodiversity, and it's not clear how much biodiversity a space is "supposed" to have, we're just going on vibes. And the vibes are right, in a way; I visited an old-growth forest and it was DIFFERENT than any place i'd ever been in a way that is hard to describe. A flourishing, biodiverse ecosystem is different than a parking lot, a lawn, a monoculture field of corn. They say it's good for your health to be "in nature." What does that mean? At what point does a place become "nature?" How many trees does it have to have?
Something that is so painful to me is when people write "Human activities" as a cause of biodiversity loss. This is an act of cowardice. WHICH human activities? Name them.
A lot of nature and ecology writings treat humans like they have an anti-biodiversity force field that emanates from them. They write like lands on Earth are each contested between two inversely proportional forces, "Nature" and "Humans."
Without any more information, this is ethereal bullshit on par with crystals having energies. I am totally perplexed at the lack of curiosity about the specific causes and details of "human impacts." The division of habitats by so many roads and relentless speeding of cars with no way for wildlife to cross...the dumping of massive amounts of poison into soils and water...the wounding and disturbance of topsoil...these are the "human activities," but we can imagine a world without such destruction, and we can create that world.
Too many essays and papers talking about Nature non-specifically, an Idea of Nature, a Concept that everyone just intuitively knows. Nature is...you know...wildness! and trees! and...well, you know, NATURE!
And we do know! When we step out into the parking lot surrounded by low, squarish buildings and blaring signs and the stink of car exhaust, we know that something is very wrong with this place! Even we find these horrible un-places harsh and unwelcoming.
But it is very hard to imagine something different, because the other type of place, the place that is beautiful and soothes the spirit and is full of life, is by definition the place where humans only go to visit, the complete opposite and inverse of a place where humans work and live! Wherever humans live, shop, eat, fulfill their daily needs, that place is Not Nature.
The huge mistake, is that we believe that it is necessary to have places that are Not Nature. We believe that for humans to exist, areas must be set aside where the very concept of Nature is utterly obliterated.
From this imaginary and dismal point of view, we have to carefully confine our own lives to places that are utterly poisoned, sterilized, made into a hostile wasteland, and leave all the rest of the living biosphere to itself in pristine preserves.
And in this imaginary and dismal point of view, the one that divides Earth into Nature and Humans, it is okay to poison and to sterilize and to destroy, because humans must live SOMEWHERE, therefore Nature must be utterly excluded from at least SOME of Earth.
BUT...WHAT IF EVERYWHERE IS NATURE? What if the dandelions in the cracks of the pavement, the lichens growing on the park bench, the wildflowers on the side of the road, the sparrows in the parking lot—what if they are all Nature just as much as anything else? What if they too are sacred? What if it is our responsibility to see the connectedness of all life and to care for all ecosystems, however broken and hurt they may be?
What if Nature is not distant and abstract, untouched in some pristine place, but always reaching out, digging into the crumbled concrete and gravel and compacted ground, clawing to return to us and bring us back home?
It does not take away from the value of the old-growth forest or the unplowed prairie if we open our eyes and see even the scraggliest patch of overgrown weeds for the powerful manifestation of Nature it truly is.
Nature is not a place or a thing. Nature is the Movement, the Endless Happening, constantly alive throughout all life, the way of all things being family, the way of all things taking care of each other, the way of all life being constantly transformed through one another. You breathe the breath of the trees of your home, you drink the water of the streams of your home, you eat the sunlight that falls on your home, grown in the soil where all things go to be transformed through death into a new form of life, fed by the mycorrhizal network, pollinated by the bees, wasps, flies, and moths, nourished by the bone, blood and manure of beasts, and ultimately the fertile river valleys where agriculture first began, were replenished by the rich silt that washed down the river, which came from the forests in the mountains that shed their leaves to make a feast for a million decomposing critters, which is how the rich soil is made.
In this way they all take care of you, and in return you are asked to Live—to take care of them in return, to live as part of the great family of everything alive, to live, to live
What are human activities...? Deforestation? Mining? Spraying pesticides? Building housing developments? But is that all? Are we inherently a "bad" and "destructive" species, or is our ability to acquire and pass down knowledge, use tools and novel behaviors, alter our surroundings, shape ecosystems, adapt our lifestyles almost infinitely, and persist in almost any environment, simply incredibly powerful for good or for evil?
Tumblr media
First of all, what better way to demonstrate a contrast to anthropocentrism...than to compare the impact of humans alone to the impact of an ENTIRE KINGDOM OF LIFE, the fungi????? Of course all of Fungi are more important than one single species??? Wtf?!?!?
But also, we should not convince ourselves of our own insignificance and worthlessness to the biosphere, because in the same way that individual self-loathing can be a way to avoid the hard work of loving oneself and advocating for the love one deserves, collective self-loathing as a species is a way of avoiding the responsibility we have to other life forms.
How can this author not think of a single role Humans play in the ecosystem?? What species plants trees, saves seeds, documents rare plants, rescues injured animals and heals them, raises orphaned chicks, manages controlled burns, digs ponds, thoughtfully harvests in anticipation of future seasons, mercifully culls in understanding of suffering that cannot be fixed? What species writes a new chapter in the genome of the American Chestnut so it can be saved from extinction? What species mends the broken kakapo egg with sticky tape? What species addresses their own habitat with that fondest name of Home?
961 notes · View notes
Text
Palestine Masterlist 
Introduction to Palestine: 
Decolonize Palestine:
Palestine 101
Rainbow washing 
Frequently asked questions 
Myths 
IMEU (Institute for Middle East Understanding):
Quick Facts - The Palestinian Nakba 
The Nakba and Palestinian Refugees 
The Gaza Strip
The Palestinian catastrophe (Al-Nakba)
Al-Nakba (documentary)
The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917-2017 (book)
The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (book)
Nakba Day: What happened in Palestine in 1948? (Article)
The Nakba did not start or end in 1948 (Article)
Donations and charities: 
Al-Shabaka
Electronic Intifada 
Adalah Justice Project 
IMEU Fundraiser 
Medical Aid for Palestinians 
Palestine Children’s Relief Fund 
Addameer
Muslim Aid
Palestine Red Crescent
Gaza Mutual Aid Patreon
Books:
A New Critical Approach to the History of Palestine
The Idea of Israel: A History of Power and Knowledge
Hidden Histories: Palestine and the Eastern Mediterranean
The Balfour Declaration: Empire, the Mandate and Resistance in Palestine
Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique
From Haven to Conquest: Readings in Zionism and the Palestine Problem until 1948
Captive Revolution - Palestinian Women’s Anti-Colonial Struggle within the Israeli Prison System
Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History
Except for Palestine: The Limits of Progressive Politics
Before Their Diaspora: A Photographic History of The Palestinians 1876-1948
The Battle for Justice in Palestine Paperback
Uncivil Rites: Palestine and the Limits of Academic Freedom
Palestine Rising: How I survived the 1948 Deir Yasin Massacre
The Transformation of Palestine: Essays on the Origin and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict
A Land Without a People: Israel, Transfer, and the Palestinians 1949-1996
The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood
A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two Peoples
Where Now for Palestine?: The Demise of the Two-State Solution
Terrorist Assemblages - Homonationalism in Queer Times
Militarization and Violence against Women in Conflict Zones in the Middle East
The one-state solution: A breakthrough for peace in the Israeli-Palestinian deadlock
The Persistence of the Palestinian Question: Essays on Zionism and the Palestinians
Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel and the Palestinians
The False Prophets of Peace: Liberal Zionism and the Struggle for Palestine
Ten myths about Israel
Blaming the Victims: Spurious Scholarship and the Palestinian Question
Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, New and Revised Edition
Israel and its Palestinian Citizens - Ethnic Privileges in the Jewish State
Palestinians in Israel: Segregation, Discrimination and Democracy
Greater than the Sum of Our Parts: Feminism, Inter/Nationalism, and Palestine
Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History
Palestinian Culture:
Mountain against the Sea: Essays on Palestinian Society and Culture
Palestinian Costume
Traditional Palestinian Costume: Origins and Evolution
Tatreez & Tea: Embroidery and Storytelling in the Palestinian Diaspora
Embroidering Identities: A Century of Palestinian Clothing (Oriental Institute Museum Publications)
The Palestinian Table (Authentic Palestinian Recipes)
Falastin: A Cookbook
Palestine on a Plate: Memories from My Mother’s Kitchen
Palestinian Social Customs and Traditions
Palestinian Culture before the Nakba
Tatreez & Tea (Website)
The Traditional Clothing of Palestine
The Palestinian thobe: A creative expression of national identity
Embroidering Identities:A Century of Palestinian Clothing
Palestine Traditional Costumes
Palestine Family 
Palestinian Costume
Encyclopedia of World Dress and Fashion, v5: Volume 5: Central and Southwest Asia
Tent Work in Palestine: A Record of Discovery and Adventure
Documentaries, Films, and Video Essays:
Jenin, Jenin
Born in Gaza
GAZA 
Wedding in Galilee 
Omar
5 Broken Cameras
OBAIDA
Indigeneity, Indigenous Liberation, and Settler Colonialism (not entirely about Palestine, but an important watch for indigenous struggles worldwide - including Palestine)
Edward Said - Reflections on Exile and Other Essays
Palestine Remix: 
AL NAKBA
Gaza Lives On
Gaza we are coming
Lost cities of Palestine 
Stories from the Intifada 
Last Shepherds of the Valley
Voices from Gaza
Muhammad Smiry
Najla Shawa
Nour Naim
Wael Al dahdouh
Motaz Azaiza
Ghassan Abu Sitta
Refaat Alareer
Plestia Alaqad
Bisan Owda
Ebrahem Ateef
Mohammed Zaanoun
Doaa Mohammad
Hind Khoudary
Palestinian Voices, Organizations, and News 
Boycott Divest and Sanction (BDS)
Defense for Children in Palestine
Palestine Legal 
Palestine Action
Palestine Action US
United Nations relief and works for Palestinian refugees in the Middle East (UNRWA)
National Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP)
Times of Gaza
Middle East Eye
Middle East Monitor
Mohammed El-Kurd
Muna El-Kurd 
Electronic Intifada 
Dr. Yara Hawari (suspended on X 10/25/2023)
Mariam Barghouti
Omar Ghraieb
Steven Salaita
Noura Erakat
The Palestinian Museum N.G.
Palestine Museum US
Artists for Palestine UK 
Eye on Palestine (suspended on Instagram 10/25/2023)
52K notes · View notes
Text
Hey, so I live on unceded Chinook land. The Chinook never formally gave up the land around the mouth of the Columbia or Willapa Bay. They began getting hit hard by European diseases in the late 1700s, before Lewis and Clark ever arrived, and eventually the survivors of those communities in what is now south Pacific County headed further north up Willapa Bay to relatives up there.
When European settlers showed up in larger numbers in the mid-1800s, they assumed the land wasn't being used, so they took over pretty much everything; you still have descendants of some of these settlers who have large parcels of land here, to say nothing of all the timber interests in the area that control thousands more acres throughout the Willapa Hills.
The Chinook Indian Nation received federal recognition in 2001, but it was rescinded a year and a half later due to complaints from the Quinault Indian Nation. Since then, the Chinook have been unable to access much-needed resources from the U.S. government such as health care, housing and utilities. Federally recognized tribes receive these benefits and more, and many also have reservations; it is absolutely not an ideal situation nor is it anywhere near making up for the violent removal of indigenous people from their ancestral lands. But even these resources would have helped the Chinook a great deal over the past two decades, to include during the COVID pandemic.
The above petition is to urge the state of Washington to turn the old Naselle Youth Camp over to the Chinook Indian Nation. It would be a much larger and more stable headquarters, particularly as their current one is at risk from sea level rise and a potential earthquake and tsunami in the Cascadia Subduction Zone (which is a when situation, not an if.) Again, the NYC wouldn't undo all of the injustices over the past couple centuries and more, but it would be a step in the right direction on the part of Washington's government.
Even if you are not a resident of Washington, please show your support by signing this petition. U.S. folks can also contact their elected officials asking them to support the recognition of the Chinook Indian Nation.
Finally, here's a really good article outlining the history of Chinook recognition. And you can learn more about the Chinook's work toward recognition and how to help at http://www.chinookjustice.org.
583 notes · View notes
Text
I get so fed up when i keep hearing my teachers, across school and college, talk about how the human brain is the most developed in the world and how humans are above all animals because of our very unique prefrontal context which gives us the ability to think, something that other animals don't have. Every time i hear my literature or Psychology teachers mention this i always ask: but how do we know? How do we know that animals don't think? How do we know that OUR way of thinking is the ONLY way of thinking? How do we know that the prefrontal cortex is the only precursor for thought? How do we know that other animals don't have their own systems and philosophies or, maybe a whole other system that we can't even perceive of, given our very ideas of systems and philosophies is self contained within the limited scopes of our thoughts that human brain allows us as a species to sense and perceive. What if other animals SENSE in different ways to begin with?
So tired of anthropocentric views of intelligence.
You probably know that humans can experience “phantom limbs,” but did you know that the limbs of an octopus can have a “phantom body”? If you cut off an octopus’ tentacle, it will try to feed a mouth that is no longer there. A severed octopus tentacle also curls up when it’s exposed to negative stimuli like acid. Essentially, if an octopus dies and its tentacle is cut off, the tentacle can outlive the original animal by a whole hour. 
Octopi have as many as 130 million neurons, but the vast majority are located in their limbs, not their brains. Their mind is “distributed.” That is fundamentally unlike the human mind. We have muscle memory, but our arms can’t move completely independently of our brains.
What does this mean for octopus consciousness? Well… we don’t know. There’s no way to observe or deduce via experiment what it’s like to be a particular animal. We can see how they behave, but we won’t ever see the world through their eyes. Science can study what is outside, but not what’s inside. So, animal consciousness isn’t really the domain of science. 
As is always the case, philosophers have attempted to do what scientists cannot. The philosopher Peter Godfrey-Smith has a really great way of explaining what’s at stake: “Octopuses let us ask which features of our minds can we expect to be universal whenever intelligence arises in the universe, and which are unique to us.”  There’s a decent chance you’ve seen a popular Tumblr post about Umwelt Theory—the idea that animals have access to senses that we do not. Smells too refined for our noses, pitches too high for our ears, colors outside the range of our eyes. But the inner worlds of animals might be even stranger than that. The postmortem movement of octopus limbs suggests that some animal minds might be fundamentally different from ours. Simply put, it’s not just that some animals have access to sensations that we will never feel. They might have access to types of thoughts that we will never be able to think.
17K notes · View notes
Text
I recently finished reading The Stationery Shop of Tehran.
And if you're someone who loved Khaled Hosseini's books, you're going to devour this. Here are things I loved about the book.
Tumblr media
What the book is about, for context:
The Stationery Shop of Tehran narrates the love story of young Roya, our protagonist, and Bahman, separated due to the political turmoil in the 1960s. A stationery shop run by Mr Fakhri- a key character- becomes both a literary and a romantic oasis for Roya. But fate, of the characters and their country, has different plans for them. But roya never escapes the clutches of the events that panned out in the coup of 1953, and the people in her life it cost her.
Things I liked:
[spoilers ahead]
1. I love the cover.
2. Iranian-American author, the cultural dissonance in the writing is very intriguing to read.
3. Unextraordinary, regular characters with no control over how their lives panned out.
4. guilt as a theme is leveraged in the most realistic way i've come across in most media i've consumed so far.
5. Keenly observant portrayal of youth idealism and how it progresses when juxtaposed with political trauma and upheaval in one's life.
often youth idealism is shown as EITHER delusion from the lack of wisdom that comes from growing up, OR how excruciatingly necessary it is for the world to change. here it's portrayed as realistic as it gets. after a point you just get exhausted with an idealistic hope for your politics. when it affects your life, the life of the person you love and the life you could have had with whom you love, you gradually stop caring. it's less of a "oh look how much i gave for my country and now look how much it took away from me. therefore from today onwards i swear against any activism, the politics don't deserve me it's more a, cut to twenty years later, "hey what do you think about x conflict that's happening in your country rn", "idk man do you want some tea or not" if that makes sense. that seemed organic and real to me especially with the character's nature.
6. Extremely nuanced portrayal of class trauma and the effect of class, transcending classes and how it juxtaposes with mental health.
The portrayal of bahman's mother's mental illness is really about as accurate as it gets. the impact it has on bahman, Roya, everybody else around him. the mother itself is i think one of the most brilliantly written characters there can be. you see her as a victim of her class and how she transcends her poverty and its curses when she marries rich and how later on in life she goes out of her way to subject all the pain she went through due to her class, on to people that are "now below her." despite having gone through it herself. i fucking loved reading that. there's no natural sense of philanthropy that suddenly seeps in after you've been fucked over all your life because of the class you're born into (and why should there be? not only do we subject people to trauma due to where they're born into but we also expect them to a. overcome it b. overcome it to a point where they help others overcome it too c. transcend all boundaries and push for it to happen more and more as well. as though they owe themselves a historic transformation from the settings we've subjected them to.) once she gets more power, given everything unimaginable she's endured even after that (and in a way still because of that), when she gets the chance she derives pleasure from subjecting the same class burden onto others now. tormentingly at that. even if it's against her own son's best interest. she loves watching making people suffer and it's very. very raw and real to a point where you empathize with her despite the fact that she's the reason the one thing you wanted to happen in this book, roya and bahman living happily ever after, did not happen and the one thing that roya and bahman wanted was not only taken away from them but haunts them for the rest of their life. but "haunt" is not the right term. because it's not that dramatic. and that's another reason why i loved the writing.
In all, it's a refreshingly personal and nuanced portrayal of the things in hand. Would 10/10 recommend.
3 notes · View notes