#'nazi operatives' perfectly falls under the latter | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

rosiep66 · 7 years

Text

Nick Fury and the Fall of S.H.I.E.L.D.

"NICK FURY AND THE FALL OF S.H.I.E.L.D." I feel that characters like Phil Coulson and Steve Rogers should kneel down and kiss Nicholas J. Fury’s ass for his actions in "CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER". Why? Because his actions before, during and after the 2014 movie prevented terrorist groups like HYDRA and an Inhumanity community called Afterlife create major catastrophes following the fall of S.H.I.E.L.D. in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). In the past three years, I have noticed that a lot of MCU fans like to blame Fury for HYDRA’s infiltration of S.H.I.E.L.D. Why, I do not know. HYDRA's infiltration of the agency and other organizations had begun a few years before Fury's birth in 1951. In fact, a scene in "CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER" made it perfectly clear how HYDRA managed to infiltrate S.H.I.E.L.D. The newly formed agency had recruited HYDRA scientist Arnim Zola and a few other to form a think tank under the program known as Operation Paperclip. As many know, this program allowed S.H.I.E.L.D. and other intelligence services to recruit Nazi (or HYDRA) scientists for the benefit of their countries around the start of the Cold War. The 2014 movie also made it clear who had founded S.H.I.E.L.D. around this time - U.S. Army Colonel Chester Phillips, Peggy Carter and Howard Stark. Not only were Phillips, Carter and Stark responsible for Operation Paperclip; which allowed Arnim Zola to join S.H.I.E.L.D. and kick start HYDRA’s infiltration of the agency; they allowed this infiltration to grow for . . . how many decades? And even following Chester Phillips' death, Howard and Peggy allowed HYDRA mole Mitchell Carson to become the Head of Defense of S.H.I.E.L.D. Another HYDRA mole who eventually became part of S.H.I.E.L.D. was a former State Department diplomat named Alexander Pierce. Following Howard’s death and Peggy’s retirement, Pierce became Director of S.H.I.E.L.D. and later, the World Security Council’s Secretary. As Director of S.H.I.E.L.D., Pierce made one major mistake. He promoted Fury, whom he had first met while serving the State Department in Bogota, to the position of the agency’s new director after he joined the World Security Council. Project Oversight was a S.H.I.E.L.D. program that involved three heavily armed, satellite-linked Helicarriers designed to proactively strike out against potential threats - usually humans- before they actually happened. I do not know who was originally responsible for the creation of this program - Pierce or Fury. Pierce wanted to use the helicarriers and Arnim Zola's algorithm to root out individuals that would oppose or threaten HYDRA's goals. Fury had supported Project Oversight, as a means to defend Earth from any future non-Human threat. He had even revealed the project to a disapproving Steve Rogers aka Captain America. But in the end, Fury had misgivings about it. By setting in motion the hijacking of a S.H.I.E.L.D. ship called the Lemurian Star, Fury had an excuse to order one of his top agents, Natasha Romanoff, to accompany Rogers and a STRIKE team to free the ship’s hostages. Natasha’s mission was to download information that proved to be very . . . very important. Moviegoers eventually learned that the files that Natasha had downloaded from the Lemurian Star revealed the history of HYDRA’s infiltration of S.H.I.E.L.D., Zola’s part in it and the real plans for Project Oversight. Think about it. If Fury had not developed misgivings about Project Oversight, no one would have learned the truth about it. And no one would have learned about HYDRA’s infiltration of S.H.I.E.L.D. and other organizations like the KGB, the World Security Council and the U.S. Senate. Worse, Alexander Pierce would have gone ahead with Project Oversight, which would have led to the deaths of many people. And even though S.H.I.E.L.D. had fallen, Fury once again stepped up to the bat and re-created the agency, with Phil Coulson as the new Director. Coulson and his team stood between the world and disaster on several occasions. Ironically, instead of realizing that Fury's actions in "THE WINTER SOLDIER" had outed HYDRA and stopped both Project Oversight and the Centipede Project; both Steve Rogers in the 2014 movie and Phil Coulson in the current television series had went into rants by criticizing . . . or blaming Fury for failing to learn about HYDRA’s infiltration of S.H.I.E.L.D. in the past. Steve was angry over his discovery that his childhood friend, James "Bucky" Barnes, was still alive (after being declared dead during the last year of World War II) and a brainwashed HYDRA assassin. Coulson was angry over Fury using the dangerous Project T.A.H.I.T.I. to resurrect him. And yet, both used their anger to blame Fury for HYDRA's infiltration of S.H.I.E.L.D. Coulson knew nothing of Howard Stark, Peggy Carter and Chester Phillips’ roles in the disastrous Operation Paperclip. But Steve did. He and Natasha had learned everything when they first downloaded the Lemurian Star’s file at an old S.H.I.E.L.D. base. He should have known better. But what I found astounding about all of this is that a good number of Marvel fans still continued to blame Nick Fury for HYDRA's infiltration of S.H.I.E.L.D. and the latter's downfall. If any of them had viewed that scene between Steve Rogers, Natasha Romanoff and Arnim Zola's computer image in "CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER", they should also know better than to blame Fury.

7 notes · View notes

muzaffar1969 · 7 years

Link

http://ift.tt/2rO3sBl

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

After the Manchester suicide bombing only two weeks ago I warned my readers that the repetition of terror attacks is breeding complacency within the public, in Europe most acutely. It is not uncommon now for attacks killing dozens to be forgotten within a week of the event. The news feeds are awash in distraction, and of course, sometimes these events themselves act as distractions.

In a recent newscast of MSNBC's “Morning Joe”, BBC anchor Katty Kay stated:

“Europe is getting used to attacks like this, Mika. They have to, because we are never going to be able to totally wipe this out...”

To me, this attitude is rather indicative of the European victim-culture mindset. Many in Europe (not all, but many) seem to enjoy a steady routine of self-flagellation. Countless centuries of the feudal serf system will do that to a society. The British still pay taxes to maintain a royal family, after all. I also think that the results of the Brexit vote in the UK might mislead those of us in America into thinking that the the British are turning over a new leaf in terms of liberty and conservative-like values. While I do think there is a fierce underlying drive to protect sovereignty of the British nation, the British individual has all but abandoned any hope of their own personal sovereignty and self determination.

In mainland Europe the self-loathing natural born citizen has become a bit of a mainstay and has been exploited quite successfully by the globalist establishment. In particular, the great fear among predominantly liberal Europeans is a return to the nationalist fervor that they believe spawned the rise of Nazism and the Third Reich (I have written numerous articles outlining the involvement of the corporate and banking elite in funding and supplying vital technology to the Nazis before and during WWII). It is this “guilt” of association with the Nazi legacy that has left Europe vulnerable to manipulation from the other end of the political spectrum – the socialist/Marxist end.

It is also this mindset that allowed globalists to forcefully inject millions of Muslim immigrants through open border policies and refugee policies into EU nations without proper vetting procedures. The majority of Europeans that saw the policy as irrational and dangerous were afraid to say anything for fear that they would be labeled “fascists”.

The greatest threat is not only the conditioning of the population to accept cultural invasion without assimilation. Nor is the greatest threat the pacification of the populace in the face of rampant terror attacks. No, the pinnacle threat is what will inevitably come next – the apathy of a nation in the wake of incremental martial law and the death of personal liberty.

This past week, a team of three Muslim men struck pedestrians with a white van, then emerged wielding hunting knives in a rampage through a crowded London night spot. This is only one attack in a steady stream that have plagued Europe ever since the Cloward-Piven program of Muslim relocation allowed millions of “refugees” into the EU's borders. The vaporous ISIS terror group has since claimed responsibility.

In response, Prime Minister Theresa May has declared “enough is enough”, and demanded a review of the UK's counter-terrorism strategy. London police have been asked to adjust to new tactical conditions, patrolling streets heavily armed and utilizing surveillance helicopters with the aid of special forces units.

NOTE - After finishing this article on Sunday, I find this quote from Theresa May on Tuesday:

“We should do even more to restrict the freedom and the movements of terrorist suspects when we have enough evidence to know they present a threat, but not enough evidence to prosecute them in full in court."

"And if human rights laws get in the way of doing these things, we will change those laws to make sure we can do them..."

The deployment of over 5000 British troops at strategic locations by Theresa May is all part of a plan established in 2015 called “Operation Temperer”. The plan calls for the deployment of troops within the UK border in response to “major terrorist threats”. Essentially, it is a martial law program that acts incrementally, rather than overtly. Once implemented, Temperer would be difficult to reverse. As UK military chiefs warned when the operation was publicly exposed, troops would likely not be pulled back after commitment unless the terror threat was “reduced”, leaving the definition of the “threat level” open for rather broad interpretation.

Operation Temperer is now in full swing as police departments ask for military aid. The prime minister has obliged, replacing officers in numerous locations with military units on patrol. So, is this “martial law”? Perhaps not quite, but it is damn close to the line, and this is how tyranny is commonly implemented; not all at once, but a stepping stone at a time.

First, I would point out that May introduced Temperer measures after the Manchester bombing, and they do not seem to have done much to disrupt the latest attack in London. Second, I would also point out that the UK general elections for parliament are only a today, and it is highly likely that the latest attacks will solidify Theresa May and her Brexit base.

The timing is rather interesting...

Many in the Liberty Movement would say that this is a good thing; that finally the British will be able to reverse the forced cultural invasion of an incompatible Muslim mass. I would say that this is all part of the plan.

As I have argued since before the Brexit vote last year, we are witnessing perhaps the largest 4th Gen psy-op in history. The globalists have deliberately engineered conditions by which European nations in particular will either be enveloped by an alien ideology with no protection from their own governments, or, they will have to respond with overarching countermeasures. Meaning, Europeans have been given a false choice between the ideological cult of multiculturalism, or, martial law conditions.

In my view, the UK has been slated for the latter measure, and this makes perfect sense if you understand the game plan of the globalists.

Brexit and by extension the rise of Donald Trump in the US has been ALLOWED to happen. Despite the delusions of some in the liberty movement, the so-called “deep state” is perfectly positioned to take advantage of both events. They are not opposed in the slightest. Why? Because this is about destroying the name of sovereign nationalism and conservative principles. This is about the long game.

The UK appears to be first in the line-up. Terror attacks are mounting, May has already initiated Operation Temperer, and the attacks have continued anyway. The solution they will present will be MORE militarization, not less. It is my prediction that after a year of incrementalism and continued attacks, the entire UK will be in the midst of what many would define as full spectrum martial law. The UK government might not openly call it that, but that is what it will be.

While I personally find Muslim based societies to be abhorrent in their attitude towards individual liberty, I do see a disturbing trend developing on the other side of the coin. Western nations like the UK and the US have every right to defend their borders, to deny immigration from ANYWHERE for any reason, and to deport illegal immigrants and immigrants with provable ties to terror groups. However, the line that should not be crossed but probably will be crossed is the persecution or deportation of people merely for holding particular ideological views.

Even if the majority of citizens don't necessarily support an outright broad brush response towards all people that hold Muslim views as potential terrorists, the temptation will be overwhelming, and our respective governments will oblige it. Once we step into the world of thought crime, there is no turning back.

And, what this does is paint conservative/nationalist movements as monstrous in the eyes of future generations. They will be taught that the globalists “warned the world” about the dangerous “racist” populists and alt-right groups, and look what happened when they came to power; they vaporized the economy (see my previous articles on the Trump scapegoat narrative) and rounded up innocent people because of their belief system even though they committed no specific crimes. My fear is that what is happening here is that conservative movements are going to be driven to such madness in the name of security that we will actually make the globalists look like “good guys” by comparison.

So, what is the solution? Well, look at the choices the British people have been given: Accept multicultural sublimation without question, or, initiate complete military oversight and sacrifice personal liberty. Are there no other options available?

What about this: The UK citizenry DEMANDS the return of their right to self defense and the legalization of firearms ownership for those without a criminal background? The real solution is for UK citizens to begin providing their own security, not handing over their country to militarization because they are all disarmed and afraid.

Will this happen? I seriously doubt it. But, I do want to point out that there is clearly another path far superior to the two being offered.

Again, I believe the UK will be under martial law in a year's time. Unless the people of the UK do something NOW to assert their right to determine their own security, they will fall to a complete totalitarian framework. And, in the long run, they will only be helping the very globalists the Brexit movement in particular sought to fight against. They will do this by trampling the image of nationalism and sovereignty with the jackbooted philosophy of externalized security and government dependency, making globalism, the offered antithesis, look pleasant and tolerable in retrospect.

June 08, 2017 at 09:38AM http://ift.tt/2rNE9Q4 from Tyler Durden http://ift.tt/2rNE9Q4

#Business

0 notes