Character Analysis of Johan Liebert - Monster, Naoki Urasawa (2004)
In my opinion, Johan represents Jung's concept of the shadow, which is why both Tenma and Nina couldn't kill him in the end. Despite tirelessly, and relentlessly going after him. If they did end up doing so, they would be destroying themselves in the process. The constant fear on Tenma's face once he heard the buzz words 'monster' and 'inside of me' highlights his underlying fear. It is, of course, aggravating, considering how close they both were to killing Johan (multiple times, might I add). But, to them, it would have come at too high a cost.
Consequently, Johan was not the monster he and everyone thought him to be. The forgiveness Nina offered to Johan (as well as) Tenma’s acceptance (in a way) gave Johan that validation. In my opinion, Johan had an identity problem, not a complete lack thereof, as most people say. Johan completely understood how senseless the world is; the picture book from his childhood made sense of that senselessness. That narrative (mostly born from the book) gave significance to his existence, whether he knew it or not. I found it interesting that he went through several names throughout his life, but ‘Johan Liebert’ was recurring. Whether this is just for convenience's sake, I don’t know.
The scene where we see his reaction when re-reading the book (likely the first time since he was a child) furthers this notion. Johan's facial expressions are to be paid attention to, every single one, even if they barely change. We see the most significant change in his face in the final scene: that of sheer disappointment, hopelessness, and defeat. His master plan did not go accordingly; the plan was for him to be completely wiped off the face of the earth, rendered fictitious. The drunk man who unexpectedly shot him stripped him of that. So did Tenma, in not allowing Johan to kill/destroy his (Tenma’s) altruistic nature.
Johan's perfect suicide ultimately fails because he is not the nameless monster he believed himself to be; this is shown merely in the fact that he does not kill (nor even think about killing) Nina & Tenma; he realised that they are the only two people to understand him in this world. This also explains Johan's bizarre attachment to Tenma from the get-go (which also makes a lot of sense). In the scene where we listen to the tape, we're made aware of Johan's desperation; he does not want to forget 'Anna'; he believes they are the only two people in the world. Later on, Tenma was added to that list. Hence, every other person's life is rendered meaningless to Johan; this is the reason for his remorseless killings, of course. He killed everyone that could eventually be tied into his and Anna/Nina's existence, and arguably Tenma, too.
I also think Johan eventually lets go of this (seemingly) obsession with names in the final scene. Whether the last scene of him and Tenma speaking was a dream or not remains significant. Before Tenma reveals his potential real name to Johan, the subject is changed. This is when we learn about the biological mother's sacrifice. Despite her not choosing to sacrifice Johan, he still doubts the decision. All of this is to say that perhaps the failure of his perfect suicidal plan was, in fact, the real success after all. He successfully kills everyone who does not know him but knows of the nameless monster's existence. This explains why the only two people on this earth who did are still alive and were eventually saved emotionally.
In a way, they also saved Johan too. Hence the *seemingly* peaceful disappearance from the hospital. He just wanted to be understood. This is also why I believe he asked Nina to shoot him as a child and then again all those years later. His mother placed this seed of doubt, which he seemed confident in, but because of Nina's existence, he could extend this and not be entirely solid in this sense of doubt. He latched this on to Nina's being, hence merging their identities. As a child, he did seek her forgiveness despite his contradictory actions (asking to be shot). When she finally offered forgiveness in a similar situation later on, the doubt was gone. That little spec of forgiveness and acceptance was all he needed. Acceptance is not to say that he wanted her or even Tenma to accept his actions; hence, Johan says, 'We can't turn back now' when Nina does forgive him. Other people and their deaths (at his hands) simply did not matter to him; he was utterly indifferent to it. So evidently, that one thing mattered to him, which he mostly did not believe to be real; it turned real, giving him what he had so desperately been looking for since childhood. He is saved. The only three people that mattered in the show (concerning Johan's essence) are saved.
101 notes
·
View notes
fumi i hope you know that in an extra of how laios' party is formed he is explicitly banned from getting a crush on marcille.
like i know you went in depth on the trauma he has because of humans on your laimar post about the succubus but please know that he was explicitly banned its so goddamn funny.
im crying laughing while typing this out happy laimar love loses 🥂
Lmao yeah 🥂
It’s a very fun comic! The marriage seeker mystery can finally be put to rest 😌 I don’t really think it changes much, that it overrides anything we knew or that I theorized, esp since we already knew about the party-wide romance ban, but the meme potential (and fic potential) IS so strong now that we know Laios was the one most targeted and distrusted of all… And trust was the biggest issue, romance brings nothing but trouble in their minds but the trouble they experienced with the marriage seeker was because she was disingenuous and manipulative and Laios was oblivious, and as time went on the party realized that Marcille was trustworthy and they stopped worrying about that particular scenario happening.
It can def bring a new meaning to the "This is my succubus?!! No one can see it no one can know AAAAA" line though lmfaoo. It’s so funny and honestly such a win for aroace Laios
38 notes
·
View notes
tbqh I started reading skip and loafer because...well, okay, initially because I saw it on the shelf at kinokuniya and thought it looked cute...but then after reading up on what it's about, I thought it might deliver on examining the dynamic between a secure attachment style girl and an insecure attachment style guy that mlb fails at so spectacularly.
and you know what? I was right. there are certainly differences, but the core dynamic is there. our lead, mitsumi, grew up surrounded by unconditional love and has a healthy self-esteem as a result and our male lead, shima, was raised as a child actor in an abusive household and learned to prioritize everyone's wants and needs over his own to keep the peace. the way their dynamic plays out is messy, realistic, and so satisfying. if you're an mlb fan who finds the adrinette dynamic to be dull as dishwater as woefully underexplored and bland as I do, I highly recommend skip and loafer as a palate cleanser.
(with a bonus of queer representation and wonderfully realized, dynamic, and realistic side characters)
some bonus adrien and shima parallels:
10 notes
·
View notes
Chishiya's childhood neglect being such a core part of his character that it's one of the few insights into his backstory we get. Chishiya following in his father's footsteps to become a doctor despite (because of?) that neglect. Chishiya chosing to specialize in pediatric heart surgery because at some, entirely subconscious level he recognized he should've been treated differently. Chishiya immediately becoming complicit in the death of a child who should have been granted a donor heart.
Chishiya, in the Borderlands, numb.
19 notes
·
View notes
The thing about Nightfall is that yeah she needs further development, but if you look at the bones of what's there and compare her to both Twilight and Yuri you can still find some fascinating insights.
If you start with Twilight, he was her mentor and taught her to compartmentalise her emotions away as he does. Twilight hasn't yet realised himself but he has been slowly moving past that to feel genuine emotions with his family (something that Nightfall herself noted). By contrast, Nightfall hasn't. She's stagnant, her only real deviation from Twilight's teachings being her crush on him.
(That said, we know the position Twilight was in when he joined WISE and that attempting to lock away emotions is an unhealthy coping mechanism designed as a teaching. We've seen how both Twilight and his own mentor Handler have been affected by their prior experiences, so what's Nightfall's story? How did she end up in this same unhealthy postion and will she join Twilight and Handler in starting to break that cycle?)
In terms of how Nightfall compares to Yuri, it comes down to their relationship with their most important person. Yuri latched onto Yor because they lost their parents at a young age and Yor had to step in a provide that role, sacrificing her own childhood in the process. However, he's still locked into that childhood phase where he idealises Yor and doesn't listen to or accept that she's moving on with her life. She still wants him in it, but she wants him to get the hint when he's making her uncomfortable or being rude to Loid.
If we then look at Nightfall, we can see the same behaviour of idealising and not seeing the person for who they are. Nightfall does see that Twilight genuinely feels something for his family but she then spins that into a further idealisation of Twilight and condemnation of Yor. This is a repeating pattern with her. She believes she could do a better job than Yor and yet she demeans the very aspects of Yor that Twilight appreciates, showing that her own understanding of him is paper-thin.
The part of this the story hasn't yet explored is *why* she latched onto Twilight. She latched onto him as Yuri did Yor and allows herself this one breaking of the doctrine. If you look at all the pieces it seems that she was in a dark place and feels that Twilight, a kindred spirit, saved her. The question now is: now that he is moving on, can she start to move on too?
23 notes
·
View notes