Tumgik
#Tom Harper
kaipanzero · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Heart of Stone (2023)
101 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Wild Rose (2018)
79 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Eddie talked about his harrowing ballooning experience in the film THE AERONAUTS at the Chicago International Film Festival! -October 23, 2019-
🎥 Source : Reel Honest Reviews on Facebook
#my screenshots
11 notes · View notes
heartofstone2023 · 9 months
Text
click here to download movie
Tumblr media Tumblr media
7 notes · View notes
ulrichgebert · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
Die absurd schick und mit überdurchschnittlich vielen überdurchschnittlich attraktiven, sehr britischen Schauspielern (und Paul Dano) besetzte BBC-Miniserie War & Peace benimmt sich, wenn gerade Frieden ist, total wie ein Jane-Austen-Film.
4 notes · View notes
adamwatchesmovies · 5 months
Text
Heart of Stone (2023)
Tumblr media
It isn’t so much that Heart of Stone is bad; it’s that it doesn’t do anything good enough to stand out. This is what I think of when someone says “Netflix Top Ten Original”. When it arrives, it feels like everyone’s watching it. A week later, everyone who saw it has already forgotten about it and moved on to the next action spy-thriller with several notable stars in important roles.
Rachel Stone (Gal Gadot) is part of an MI6 field team. What agents Parker (Jamie Dornan), Yang (Jing Lusi) and Bailey (Paul Ready) don’t know is she’s secretly a member of The Charter, an ultra-secret agency dedicated to peacekeeping that operates outside of any government. The Charter uses The Heart, a sophisticated artificial intelligence, to calculate its agents’ odds of success based on every possible factor in real time. The Heart allows the agents to succeed in the most precarious situations and The Charter to hack into any device. When a mysterious hacker named Keya (Alia Bhatt) makes a move against the Charter, Stone has to blow her cover - unaware this is exactly what her opponent was hoping she would do.
I’ll admit that while watching Heart of Stone, I was entertained in a “it’s moving and I want to see what’s coming next” sort of way. Looking back - particularly after writing that synopsis down - this is the store-brand version of your spy-thriller action film. I can remember a death-defying chase down the Italian Alps and the picture’s final confrontation but these scenes are nothing special; they could be in any movie like this. Stone herself is a protagonist we’ve seen a thousand times. Gal Gadot plays the part fine and she handles the stunts with no problem but her character makes no impact. Similarly, The Charter is dull, dull, dull as a secret organization. I can’t think of any movie that’s done exactly what they’re doing, but I swear I’ve seen it before, probably in another movie I forgot soon after it ended.
Heart of Stone sort of feels like the third entry in a franchise that's limping along. It's as if most of the cast are sick of their roles and asking for their characters to be killed off, revealed as traitors or retired, or are the new replacements introduced to help revitalize a fledgling series. Because Stone is at her most interesting when she has to pretend like she can’t handle fieldwork, the film is most engaging at the beginning, when she’s paired up with Bailey, Yang and Parker. About a third of the movie in, they get dropped. Their absence and the focus on Stone should get us all riled up emotionally but we’re just not invested in the characters enough to really care.
On the upside, there are plenty of twists and turns along the way, the stunt work is good, the action well shot and the special effects convincing. While Stone might not be memorable, you do like her. You also like Gal Gadot in the role enough to never feel bored despite the been-there-done-that story and premise. I want to be nice to this movie but too often, it does the obvious or makes a choice that will have you thinking “Couldn’t you have tried something else?” There’s a point towards the end when a villainous character receives a chance at redemption. The movie really wants us to believe they deserve it. Meanwhile, I’m just thinking “What, you didn’t realize the people you were working with were power-hungry madmen when you were setting up a casino where the high-rollers can bet on who will die first in the footage you’ve hacked from the U.S. military? Give me a break.”
Heart of Stone is Mission: Impossible at home. I mean… it is, LITERALLY since you don’t have to go to the theater to see it and it’s about a group of people, led by an action star doing all sorts of action things to save the day from a shadowing organization. It is also figuratively “Mission: Impossible at home”. (September 3, 2023)
Tumblr media
6 notes · View notes
whatsnewtonetflix · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
It's the last episode of What's New to Netflix Instant!? ever! But don't worry, we'll be back next month with a new name for our podcast (hint: it's more or less the same name), and in the meantime, we got this fresh episode for you detailing all of the new titles coming to Netflix in September 2023.
Then we watch Matthew Broderick invent a highly addictive new pharmaceutical that destroys lives and makes his business billions of dollars in the miniseries, Painkiller from 2023. Next, Gal Gadot is a double agent who gets double-crossed while trying to locate an AI software called The Heart before it falls into the wrong hands in Heart of Stone from 2023. And finally, a disparate group of people decide to capitalize on the inevitable collapse of the housing market in The Big Short from 2015.
All of this plus teenage party movies, dating shows that don't feature werewolves, the growing number of small towns with secrets, Spy Ops, Spy Kids, Power Rangers, and Netflix acquires numerous shows that you can throw on in the background while you do other stuff.
CLICK BELOW TO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD
got a suggestion for the show?: [email protected]
5 notes · View notes
watchingalotofmovies · 8 months
Text
Heart of Stone
Tumblr media
Heart of Stone    [trailer]
An intelligence operative for a shadowy global peacekeeping agency races to stop a hacker from stealing its most valuable and dangerous weapon.
Passable entertainment, the two likable leads Gal Gadot and Jamie Dornan certainly help. But the film as a whole certainly isn't memorable. You can watch it just to observe the Bond movie influences. Location hopping, part of the score, even the opening credits.
Watching the action scenes in Lisbon is more fun when you're familiar with the locations.
Side note, I wonder what international audiences make of Matthias Schweighöfer.
6 notes · View notes
ultrahpfan5blog · 9 months
Text
Heart of Stone - a fairly typical Netflix action film....
Netflix action films, barring the two Extraction films, have generally been very generic. Heart of Stone is about as generic as it can get. Not an incompetently made movie, but just about everything in this film has been done before, and fairly recently. This film really did feel like Mission Impossible meets Citadel. And indeed, there are elements of the story that feel directly ripped off, such as a fictional independent intelligence agency, which was present in Citadel, and an AI technology system, which was present in Dead Reckoning P1. I will give it this, the film looks well produced. I'm sure Netflix spent a lot of money on this film and it feels that way. The locales and the action is all very competent and fun to watch. Problem is that there isn't much else to the film. Its essentially bad guys trying to take power by using this AI technology and good guys trying to stop it. The film at points tries to murky the waters by trying to have characters question who is good and bad, but it never really commits to it and you are still pretty much watching a fairly black and white argument play out.
When it comes to performances, Gal Gadot is not the greatest actress around, but I admit that she has improved over the years, especially with her facial expressions. She still has issues with her dialogue delivery at times, but overall she is quite charming in the role and the film plays to her strength. She somehow manages to toe the line between being superheroic, yet being fallible. Jamie Dornan as the main villain is fine. I mean, it was super obvious to me that he would be the villain, and it isn't as if the movie spends a very long time trying to hide the twist, which I appreciate. His performance is solid, without being particularly memorable. There is just nothing special about the character and his motivation for him to really dig out in terms of performance. Alia Bhatt, in her hollywood debut, is fine as well. She probably is the only character who has somewhat of an arc. I feel like the film should have spent a bit more time on the dynamic between Keya and Stone, because that is kind of the crux of the film. As with a lot of actresses acting for the first time in english, you do get the sense that she at times struggled with it, despite being fluent in the language. Its one thing to speak fluently in English and another to act in English if you haven't really done it before. Outside of these three, there isn't anyone really who has a character to speak of. Glenn Close randomly pops into the film in a nothing role. BD Wong has a similarly small role. Sophie Okonedo as Nomad and Matthias Schweighöfer as a Charter agent are the only other ones who have any substantial screen time, but not really enough to make major impact.
All in all, Netflix movies get graded on a curve by me. Would I watch this in a theater? No. There is nothing in this movie that you haven't seen done better. Is this a watchable movie at home if you already have a Netflix account? Sure! There's nothing blatantly incompetent or bad about it. Its well produced and the action is generally pretty good. There are worse Netflix movies out there and there are probably worse theatrical movies out there too. I would probably grade this a 5/10.
I feel that these mid level action spy movies/tv shows have reached a saturation point. The Gray Man, Citadel, Heart of Stone, The 355, The Protege etc.... they all feel and look very similar. And a lot of these have fairly big name actors and actresses behind it. I don't know how, but these films/tv shows have to figure out a way not to look and feel so generic.
3 notes · View notes
floorman3 · 9 months
Text
Heart of Stone Review- A Spy Film That Feels Very Familiar But Is Still Pretty Good
Of late a lot of the streaming services have been getting into the spy game. They’ve been creating new films or series like Citadel, Prime Video, Lioness, Paramount Plus, for their services. Another such film is Heart of Stone for Netflix based on a story by Greg Rucka, popular author and comic book writer, This one stars a global mega star Gal Gadot. Famous for portraying Wonder Woman.  When she…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
5 notes · View notes
geekcavepodcast · 9 months
Text
youtube
Heart of Stone Final Look Trailer
Intelligence operative Agent Rachel Stone is the only one in her agency to stand between her global, peace-keeping organization and the loss if The Heart, its most valuable and dangerous asset.
Heart of Stone stars Gal Gadot, Jamie Dornan, Alia Bhatt, and Matthias Schweighöfer. Tom Harper is directing from a screenplay by Greg Rucka and Allison Schroeder.
Heart of Stone hits Netflix on August 11, 2023.
2 notes · View notes
heavenlycinema · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Aeronauts 2019
Tom Harper Dir.
“There are two ways to break a storm. One is to travel beneath it. The other, to travel above it. The safest way is up.”
17 notes · View notes
topperscumslut · 2 years
Text
the rest of the quads telling nicky the quadfather wasn’t real was lowkey some fucky shit let the man live u little shits
14 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Eddie Redmayne and Director Tom Harper at the Telluride Film Festival for "The Aeronauts" Premiere. (August 2019)
📸 Credit: Robert J Blattel on Twitter
16 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Peaky Blinders, Otto Bathurst, Tom Harper, Colm McCarthy, Tim Mielants, David Caffrey, Anthony Byrne, 2013-2022
3 notes · View notes
disneymbti · 1 year
Note
Tom and Anne from nrdd
Hi there sweetie, I really hope you like this a lot!
Tom Harper's MBTI Type, Big Three and Enneagram Type
Tumblr media
MBTI Type: ENFP [The Campaigner]
ENFP types are generally very outgoing and lively, preferring to go out rather than stay in. They love conversing with other people and generally process their thoughts externally.
They are great problem solvers and enjoy figuring out how everything is connected. They tend to focus more on the future than the present.
Campaigners like to keep the peace and avoid conflict. They care more about subjective principles than logic and fact. 
They are flexible and spontaneous, preferring to keep their options open. They dislike routines, schedules, and strict rules.
Big Three: Virgo Sun, Aries Moon and Cancer Rising
Virgo Sun: Governed by communication planet Mercury, Virgos are the thinkers of the zodiac. Virgos process information with diligence and use facts to solve problems. 
Aries Moon: Lunar Aries are known to be emotionally responsive and impulsive at times, as they lead with fiery passions over than logic or reason.
Cancer Rising: Cancer ascendants tend to wear their hearts on their sleeves and take care of those they love.
Enneagram Type: 6w7 [The Confidant]
Basic Fear: Six wing sevens’ fear losing their support system. This may be expressed through self-deprecating humor, in which they seek affirmation and assurance from other people.
Basic Desire: Their basic desire is to feel safe and supported. They show this by being loving and supportive to others. They honor their commitments and are very loyal to their friends.
Like other sixes, Confidants defend themselves by projecting their feelings, which may lead them to misunderstanding themselves and their relationships.
Anne Harper's MBTI Type, Big Three and Enneagram Type
Tumblr media
MBTI Type: ESFJ [The Consul]
As extroverts, Consuls are talkative, energetic, and thrive around people. They prefer not to spend too much time alone.
Highly observant, their focus lies more on the details than on how everything connects together. They trust facts over theories—and they make decisions based on what they can see right now.
ESFJs are feelers who prioritize emotion rather than logic in their decision-making.  Empathetic and diplomatic, they do what feels right rather than what makes sense.
They’re structured and organized, preferring to plan ahead so they know what’s going to happen. They like rules, processes and schedules.
Big Three: Taurus Sun, Cancer Moon and Aries Rising
Taurus Sun: The Bull tends to be drawn to a creative, indulgent lifestyle — and we wouldn’t expect anything less from a Venus ruled sign. They're also thought to have a stubborn, loyal and grounded personality.
Cancer Moon: The emotions of Cancer Moons have no limits, restraints, or depths. This is a cosmic placement that often leads to sweetness, kindness, emotional awareness and responsibility. 
Aries Rising: Aries ascendants are known as the go-getters of the zodiac. They don’t let anything stand in their way of achieving their personal goals.
Enneagram Type: 2w1 [The Companion]
Basic Fear: Enneagram type two-wing-ones fear being unwanted by those they love. They tend to take on a caretaker role to serve others and avoid feelings of insecurity.
Basic Desire: They desire love and acceptance above all else. They are service-oriented and humble, seeking to help better the lives of those in their community.
Companions tend to stifle and repress their negative emotions and personal desires. They may feel internally conflicted as they work to meet everyone else’s needs but their own.
4 notes · View notes