analyze orv. over-analyze orv. chew it up and let every drop of meaning you can extract from it drip down your throat like honey and spit the husk back out. project yourself into orv. add your own meaning to orv. assume that singshong intended everything. assume that even if they didn't, it's okay, because the meaning that you've found is a reflection of your own lived experience and it loves you just as much as you love it. allow orv to mirror your experiences to you in a way that you find beautiful. conversely, allow it to not make sense to you at all. allow it to show you things you haven't seen, things you're uncomfortable with, and things you fear. allow yourself to disagree with it. criticize orv. point out things you disliked, things you feel could have been done better, characters who are flat and scenes which don't flow. please, just engage with what you read and pour yourself into it and allow it to pour itself into you
172 notes
·
View notes
Dean just delivered his ‘this is our last night on earth’ line
204 notes
·
View notes
we should not, in fact, bring back man-hating feminism
like you can say your post isn't a safe place for radfems and terfs all you want but you specifically said we should bring back man-hating feminism
man-hating feminism hates trans women of color first and foremost.
man-hating feminism hates muslim men, trans men, intersex people. and i say this again, most of all, man-hating feminism hates trans women of color more than anyone. (more on this point)
we do not need to bring that back. the idea of bringing that back should sicken you. it should anger you. it should be unthinkable that you would support that.
63 notes
·
View notes
want to give my two cents on the AI usage in the maestro trailer--
i think seventeen doing a whole concept that is anti-AI is very cool, especially as creatives themselves i think it's good that they're speaking up against it and i hope it gets more ppl talking about the issue. i also understand on a surface level the artistic choice (whether it was made by the members, the mv director, or whoever else), to directly use AI in contrast to real, human-made visuals and music in order to criticize it. i also appreciate that they clearly stated the intention of the use of AI at the beginning of the video
however, although i understand it to an extent, i do not agree with the choice to use AI to critique AI. one of the main ethical concerns with generative AI is that it is trained on other artists' work without their knowledge, consent, or compensation. and even when AI generated images are being used to critique AI, it still does not negate this particular ethical concern
the use of AI to critique also does not negate the fact that this is work that could have been done by an actual artist. i have seen some people argue that it's okay in this context because it's a critique specifically about AI, and it is content that never would have been done by a real artist anyway because it doesn't make sense for the story they're trying to tell. but i disagree. i think you can still tell the exact same story without using AI
and in fact, i would argue that it would make the anti-AI message stronger if they HAD paid an artist to draw/animate the scenes that are supposed to represent AI generated images. wouldn't it just be proof that humans can create images that are just as bad and nonsensical and soulless as AI, but that AI can't replicate the creativity and beauty and basic fucking anatomy that's in human-made art?
it feels very obvious this was not just a way to cut corners and costs like a lot of scummy people are using AI for. ultimately it was a very intentional creative decision, i just personally think it was a very poor one. and even if some ethical considerations were taken into account before this decision, i certainly don't think all of them were. at the very least i feel like the decision undermines the message they want to convey
i would also like to recognize that i myself am not an artist, and i have seen some artists that are totally on board with the use of AI in this specific context, so clearly this is not a topic that is cut and dry. but generative AI is still new, and i think it's important to keep having these conversations
48 notes
·
View notes
There was this post* that mentioned Gilraen's "I gave Hope to the Dunedain; I kept no Hope for myself" and Elwing & Eärendil, and in the end was like "Tolkien and parents", and then I just had to remember how he literally considered his own mother something of a martyr (long story short, she converted to Catholicism with her sons and their very Protestant family just... disowned her. and Tolkien seemed to be sure that she would have lived longer if she had had their support, with the better healthcare it could have provided et all), and now I'm a little tearful.
31 notes
·
View notes
I saw a post going around talking about a problem the op has with the terms "cozy" and "wholesome" being turned into a game genre/market and though I agree with some of the points made, I think my personal issue with it is that it's a shit marketing term.
For every game you call "cozy" or "wholesome" I guarantee there's a bunch of better words to describe it. The terms "wholesome" and "cozy" tell me absolutely nothing about the game, and at this point has basically just become a less sexist marketing term for "girl games!" It's just a shitty marketing term being used to round up any games and genres considered 'feminine' instead of just acknowledging them as regular video games and using regular words to describe them.
18 notes
·
View notes
it does make me laugh though because like. being in the fallen london fandom uniquely trained me to Destroy My Notifications in other, larger fandoms because i have the inability to keep my thoughts to myself and will be loudly effusive about the works and ideas of others. i will yell on tumblr. i will ask writers and artists to gush about their ideas and their favourite things. ingratiate yourself to fandoms by being unrepentantly enthusiastic.
12 notes
·
View notes