Tumgik
#they’re the funniest people ever
maxgovroom · 1 year
Text
i’ve just learned that the red bull crew gifted max a red bull can with his drs actuator from the 2022 spain gp with an engraving that reads “drs…i have no fucking drs” and it’s the funniest thing ever
90 notes · View notes
laios-burger · 10 months
Text
Biggest hater in hi3 poll
Reblog and tell if im forgetting anyone!
58 notes · View notes
nat1nonsense · 2 years
Text
I know that everyone has already said this, but Aabria+Brennan+Matt podcast when????
291 notes · View notes
burningthetree · 30 days
Note
are u britain
Uhm. No?
2 notes · View notes
reformedmercymain · 1 year
Text
People who are smug about their skill in ovw are the same ones who are low gm and smurf in plat and diamond because they can’t feed their own ego when getting dunked on by players of their own skill level
10 notes · View notes
cuntryclubs · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
men are so annoying get a real job
2 notes · View notes
spookyboywhump · 2 years
Text
Can’t stop thinking about the fact I saw a post on my own dash with my own eyes unironically use the term “gendies” in a “derogatory” manner
10 notes · View notes
ghostbeam · 1 year
Text
Have been getting through the chimera ant arc w mars and I have never felt more connected to the shaky cat gif than I do while watching it
Tumblr media
6 notes · View notes
apollos-boyfriend · 2 years
Note
X33n and Kara put it pretty well the other day, in that Jordan is a person who will ask you to elaborate and explain a joke and just completely derail the humor of it. It has the funniest comedic implications he's just a Himbo Comedic genius and doesn't even realize it half the time. Because then it just turns into hypotheticals like the nearly hour long debate speech he had about flat earth yesterday because someone made a joke about a song sung by a well known flat earther and chat elaborated on the joke
YEAH YEAH. typically when people go too into depth when explaining a joke it gets watered down and the humor is completely lost. which still happens to some extent when jordan does it. but he goes about it in such an obscure and genuine way that it becomes 1000x funnier to listen to him slowly devolve into madness trying to figure out how it would realistically work. it’s something i’ve NEVER seen anyone else be able to pull off and i don’t think i ever will
6 notes · View notes
ltcolonelcarter · 2 years
Text
teaching has reached new heights: my students have meme’d me. I will never do better than this
3 notes · View notes
bisexual-kelsier · 10 months
Text
Man. Small fandoms are wild huh?
0 notes
loose-and-goose · 1 year
Text
“I shut the door slowly and exhaled: it was over.”
He was dead. It took forever and like sixteen tries, but it seemed for real this time.
The client looked up at me from where she knelt on the floor, a rosary clasped between her fingers.
“Is it finished?” She asked, tears and mascara running from her enormous blue eyes, down her plump cheeks,
“It is,” I said with all the confidence I did not have.
“Oh, thank God,” she breathed out. “Just a moment, I’ve got the rest of the payment ready. I’ll be right back.”
The goal was simple. Tell the sad and lonely people that you are a vampire hunter. Charge an exorbitant fee and ask for half of the payment up front. Do something loud and outlandish behind a closed door, and then tell them that it was over. The evil had been vanquished, or whatever. Then, skip town before they realize that they’re still out of their minds enough to believe in such a thing as vampires.
This was the plan.
But, unfortunately, it would happen that vampires were real, and I did not know the first thing about killing them. And rather than a large group of vampires, there seemed to be one vampire wreaking havoc in every town in a hundred mile radius.
She brought out the suitcase full of bills. I took it, my hands still dripping with his blood.
We said our goodbyes, and I walked out into the night, heading toward the woods (which seemed like something a vampire hunter would do, I think).
I’d barely made it ten paces out of the threshold before his husk appeared next to me.
“Ouch! Almost had me that time. That’s gonna hurt for a while.” He laughed, reattaching his head. “Hey, where’s my cut?”
0 notes
phddyke · 4 months
Text
Hazbin Hotel is actually healing my inner ex-Christian so hard.
No joke, I nearly started cheering when Lute called Charlie and Vaggie’s love “vile and blasphemous” (and then burst out laughing when Adam immediately followed it up with “Hot as fuck though”). I know that may sound weird considering that I am, in fact, a lesbian, but here me out:
Seeing Christians being explicitly homophobic onscreen? It validates me. It makes me think “Oh yeah, I’m not crazy, Christians are that hateful!” And, call me crazy, but I think homophobia being tied in with villainy is a good thing. Neither Adam or Lute are supposed to be good people; they are very obviously the villain, and that establishes their behavior as bad. Someone on Twitter said that Lute gave them religious fanatic vibes and I couldn’t agree more.
And here’s the thing, too: it’s explicit homophobia, not some dumb metaphor. There’s no way to take it as anything else. And I really need that. I need to see Christians being explicitly homophobic onscreen in the same way that other people need and create worlds where homophobia doesn’t exist.
But me? I want my pain and suffering acknowledged. I want the harm that Christianity does acknowledged. Homophobia is real and the religious kind doubly so. I related to Vaggie so much in that episode; I felt her trepidation about going back to Heaven. Felt like a good metaphor for escaping a fundamentalist church only to be forced to visit again.
And Viv is not afraid to explicitly point this out and criticize them. Like, yes! Say it! They are hypocrites! They don’t care about people being better, they only care about punishment! They maimed one of their own and left her to die because she spared a child! They’re homophobic freaks! They would never see the good that Angel does and how he’s improved and is wonderful, they only see that he’s a drug addict and a sex worker and think he’s worthless for that even though Jesus broke bread with sex workers and people considered the dregs of society. (And of course Angel is gay on top of that.)
And another thing: not only did the Adam line make me laugh, but the second homophobic Lute line about “he blew his shot like the cocks in his mouth” cracked me up too. It reminded me of the pilot where Katie Killjoy said “I don’t touch the gays” to Charlie, which is a line that made me laugh for 4+ years straight. When I told my brother that was the funniest homophobia I’d ever heard in media, he very wisely said, “All homophobia is funny if you think about it.” And you know what? He’s right. It is funny, because it’s so fundamentally goddamn stupid, so let’s give characters ridiculous lines so everyone can laugh at how idiotic they and their beliefs sound.
1K notes · View notes
apotelesmaa · 2 years
Text
The required defiled chalice taking half of your hp but also greatly reducing damage is fine tbh and I wouldn’t mind it except for the fact that 1) elemental damage is not reduced 2) 2/3 of the fucking bosses they put in there are fire themed bosses. I don’t think bloodborne is the hardest fromsoft game but I definitely think it is the meanest game.
1 note · View note
swiftful-thinking13 · 2 years
Text
I walked seven miles at the beach with my coworkers this morning and it was SO therapeutic
1 note · View note
terastalungrad · 2 months
Text
Sometimes, you’re a comedian with a touring show to promote, so you do an interview with a regional newspaper.
I think that’d be the funniest possible time to reveal a big scoop, wouldn’t it?
Stewart Lee is currently touring, and to promote his Yeovil performance, gave an interview to Blackmore Vale Magazine.  According to Wikipedia, the Blackmore Vale is an area of north Dorset, south Somerset and southwest Wiltshire.  According to the comedian Jake Baker, the magazine would cover his school sports day as he grew up in Dorset.  That’s the level of news you’d expect.
The questions are friendly and easy, from a journalist clearly familiar with Lee’s work and history.
The first question is about the show’s angle.  Lee describes the nature of the show, and here’s an excerpt:
So it looks like stand-up, and sounds like stand-up, but it’s actually a kind of character piece about a desperate person who’s frightened and trying to organise the world in a way that puts them in control. And I guess you could argue that’s what a lot of stand-ups are doing anyway. Ricky Gervais to me looks like a very frightened man. He’s frightened of transgender people coming after him, the act is a defensive wall.
Fun!  This is a Ricky Gervais hate blog, so it’s nice to see a sudden, unexpected attack in an unrelated promotional interview.
Lee mentions Gervais again in response to question four.
Sometimes I become bitter and think ‘I get all this good press, why can’t I get 10 million quid for a TV special like Ricky Gervais?’ But on the other hand, I wouldn’t want that audience, it wouldn’t allow me to be better.
And then again to question eight, where Lee explains why he spends six months running new shows in the relatively small Leicester Square Theatre (as opposed to arena comics who might do 10 warmup shows followed by 60 tour dates).
You can still run it like a club gig, you can interact with people in real time. Also, you wouldn’t get better at the show because you wouldn’t have done it as many times. You can see this with an act like Gervais. Those shows have not been run in, they’re not fluid, they’re a succession of inflexible statements that would snap like twigs if the pressure of an unforeseen event was applied to them.
The journalist finally addresses this head on.  It really is worth reading the entire article - there’s a lot more than I’m quoting, including an interesting story about Sean Lock:
But here are my favourite bits:
[Gervais] still kind of copies me though, which is the weird thing. There’s still a lot of cadences of what I do but they’re used in the service of evil. In Star Wars, he’s Darth Vader and he’s taken the force, which is me, and used it for evil purposes. He was a fanboy, he was actually the booker at University of London and used to book me and Sean Lock all the time. And when he became famous for the Office, he wrote an hour-long act that was so indebted to us it was awkward. [...] If he’d come up through the circuit that would have been rubbed off him because you find your own voice doing club gigs. It took me two years of gigging five nights a week to come through the mesh of things I liked. But he didn’t have that experience in the same way. [...] Funnily enough, in his first show there were bits I’d never recorded that he’d do almost verbatim. He’d clearly remembered them. I went to see him at the Bloomsbury – on his invitation actually – with my then girlfriend and she was very concerned for me. I’d given up at that point due to lack of interest, and she was concerned for what it felt like to see my act being done to hundreds of people, it was quite weird. On the other hand, that sort of did make me think I don’t want it to be consumed into someone else’s vocabulary. And also, I think because he had a residual sense of guilt, he would always credit me in interviews as being an influence – that helped me in 2004 to get the audience back.
This is, to my knowledge, the first time Lee’s ever claimed that Gervais stole his material.  He’s certainly talked about Gervais clearly taking influence from him (though in the past, he downplayed this compared to the account given in this interview).
It’s a pretty big thing to accuse a comic of stealing material.  That’s a big taboo.  I reckon this is partly because Lee wants to discourage fans of Gervais from coming to the show.
Anyway, let’s finish by quoting the end of the interview:
It must be strange to have that level of financial remuneration and those audience figures but not really a single good review. And I expect what that does for you is create a cognitive dissonance where you have to manufacture a worldview by which the whole world is wrong and you’re right. Which can’t necessarily be very good for your mental health, although I expect the money’s nice.
637 notes · View notes