Trump BACKSTABBED by Billionaire Pal, WORST FEARS Come True
Australian billionaire, Anthony Pratt may be the key to convicting Donald Trump in the Mar-a-Lago obstruction and espionage criminal case in Florida. Michael Popok of Legal AF reports on new secret audio recordings obtained by 60 minutes Australia, which once in the hands of Jack Smith and the team of special prosecutors, could blow the case wide open
12 notes
·
View notes
25 of the world’s greatest Civil War legal scholars have banded together and wrote to the United States Supreme Court that the drafters of the 14th Amendment in 1868 would be SHOCKED that Trump was not INSTANTLY DISQUALIFIED and banned from the ballot by his actions on January 6th.
VIDEO Michael Popok of Legal AF explains their key historical arguments and why they should defeat Trump’s half baked theories that a president can’t be disqualified without an act of congress.
READ THE BRIEF SENT TO US SUPREME COURT
2/1/24 This gives me hope. Thank you
I'm sharing it everywhere. It's the most positive thing I've seen in recent years.
14th Amendment, Section 3 reads:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
8 notes
·
View notes
Trump’s LAST-DITCH Effort to Avoid Financial RUIN Hits MAJOR Roadblock
Feb 29, 2024 Not so fast Donnie! You may not get your hands on $4 Billion in (desperately needed) new money next month. Why? Because one of Truth Social's co-founders just filed a new lawsuit in Delaware seeking to IMMEDIATELY STOP the company from going public and to remove it's executive board. Michael Popok reports on a new emergency suit filed which could DELAY substantially when Trump gets his money, and which has caused a $300 MILLION dollar loss to Trump already!
1,458 Comments
2 notes
·
View notes
LIVE: Trump GAGGED and ORDERED to Trial, NOT Taking it Well
CC AMERIKKKA
STOP AMORAL UNCHECKED UNHINGED KKKILLER KKKLOWN TEFLON DON
STOP VANILLA ISIS
0 notes
Michael Popok of the Meidas Touch Network is a fantastic communicator and a personable teacher. He wears his enthusiasm on his sleeve for the work that he does, and clearly very much loves and respects that work to his very core...
I'm certain that I'd likely get my butt handed to me, time after time after time, if he and I were ever to discuss or debate ANYTHING over multiple occasions. Yet, I'm also certain that I'd very much enjoy each and every one of those interactions!
For those that don't enjoy politics and law, give him some tries! For those that just can't stand it when everything BUT holy doctrines are addressed or incorporated, ALSO give him some tries! Respect is as it should be (aside from the networky titling for clicks, which does Michael's work a disservice, in my opinion):
0 notes
Judge Luttig Issues DIRE WARNING to Supreme Court over Trump Immunity
Apr 29, 2024 In a special Legal AF no holds barred exclusive interview, conservative constitutional scholar former appellate Judge J Michael Luttig joins Michael Popok again to explain why he is so disheartened with the Supreme Court oral argument on whether Trump should be granted immunity from criminal prosecution, and why it could lead to it “cutting the heart out of” and “unsouling” of our constitutional democracy.
this entire uh distinction
9:04between uh official acts official acts that might give rise to criminal
9:11prosecution and private or personal or candidate acts that might give rise to
9:18to criminal prosecution as a tempest and a teapot uh for almost 250 years since
9:25the founding of this nation uh this line has never been suggested let alone held
9:33to Exist by the Supreme Court of the United States but I was so I'm so
9:39confused by this um for this reason uh as Justice Jackson was was
9:46saying if anything if anything a president should be uh um
9:54accountable for criminal acts taken in his official capacity as president of
10:02the United States of America I of course agree that that that that he or she
10:08should also be accountable for private or personal and and and of course
10:14candidate acts but it's counterintuitive to me Michael to to argue as the former
10:22president has has done and as the Supreme Court is considering
10:30that the president of United States uh should not be uh prosecutable and
10:38therefore should be immune from prosecution for criminal acts against the United States committed in His
10:45official capacity as the President of the United States I simply do not get it
10:51but there's no question at all that the Supreme cour Court is considering just that
10:59now I will add this the the Supreme Court is concerned
11:06about the criminalization of of of uh presidential
11:12acts and actions that ought not be
11:19criminalized I understand that concern that's not the case here the
11:27Supreme Court has before one single case that presents one single question for
11:34decision and that is whether a president of the United States can can seek to
11:41overturn an election that he lost fair and square so as to uh remain in
11:50power depriving his success for success or of his rightful power by virtue of
12:00having been elected by the the American people and at the same time preventing
12:06the peaceful transfer of power for the first time uh in American history that
12:13is the narrow specific and profoundly important
12:19question before The Supreme Court today and it's the only question and during
12:25this week's argument which lasted over two and a half hours the Supreme Court barely even
12:34discussed that issue at the same time discussing everything else Under the Sun
12:42that is utterly irrelevant and your brief that you filed along with others as an amicus was focused on that issue
12:49that I don't know it was almost like well we don't you're you were you were encouraging the court and obviously the
12:56the the right rightwing of the Court did not take up your the invitation that you gave which is the proper constitutional
13:03approach you've got an indictment here about a president at the time that tried
13:09to cling the power and tried to prevent and get himself a second term that goes to core issues in the Constitution your
13:16entire brief was about that was about this particular set of crimes that have
13:21been charged could never be immune and then you gave all the reasons over 50
13:26pages why that was the case how frustrated were you to listen to two and a half hours and not have that issue
13:34come up at all I'll and I'll I'll preface it this way instead as I've told our listeners and followers to give them
13:41a little bit of a decoder ring when you hear justices and unfortunately it's usually on the right wing say things
13:48like I don't want to talk about the facts of this case let's talk about it in the abstract I don't care about this
13:56particular indictment I care about Legacy in future and that's paraphrasing
LISTEN 40:28
7,773 Comments
0 notes