Tumgik
#sussex scam
Text
Show Up, Take Photos
The Meghans are global frauds. Every "good" deed, Every word & Every dollar is a GRIFT. "Nigerian girls & women" my arse.💔
Do they really expect us to believe that a global games event could ever be hosted by a country that repeatedly loses track of women & children? Harry and Meghan have the lowest of low in IQs but the rest of the world can see that THIS poverty tourism trip is yet another SUSSEX SCAM.
No country will send disabled athletes or veterans to compete in a country that cannot keep track of school kids. Shame on Nigeria's Defense Minister and all at Invictus who are involved in this fraudulent visit.
"Bring Back our Girls 2.0
"The abduction of the 287 children in Kaduna state on March 7, 2024 near the West African nation’s capital, is one of the largest school kidnappings in the decade since the kidnapping of schoolgirls in Borno state’s Chibok village in 2014 stunned the world. Analysts and activists say the security lapses that allowed that mass abduction remain..."
"One man was shot dead as he tried to save the students, school authorities said"
"The parallels between the two kidnappings have created more worry for parents, as even to this day nearly 100 of the Chibok girls remain missing."
Tumblr media Tumblr media
BY CHINEDU ASADU
March 8, 2024
ABUJA, Nigeria (AP) — "Security forces swept through large forests in Nigeria’s northwest region on Friday in search of nearly 300 children abducted from their school by motorcycle-riding gunmen in the latest mass kidnapping, which analysts and activists blamed on the failure of intelligence and a slow security response.
The abduction of the 287 children in Kaduna state, near the West African nation’s capital, is one of the largest school kidnappings in the decade since the kidnapping of schoolgirls in Borno state’s Chibok village in 2014 stunned the world. Analysts and activists say the security lapses that allowed that mass abduction remain.
The victims of the latest attack — among them at least 100 children aged 12 or under — were surrounded and marched into a forest just as they were starting the school day, said locals in Kuriga town, located 55 miles (89 kilometers) from the city of Kaduna. One man was shot dead as he tried to save the students, school authorities said."
J-P Mauro - published on 03/14/24
"With no word from the abductors, the bishops are calling on the state to identify the kidnappers and save the hostages.
The remote town of Kuriga, in Nigeria’s Kaduna state, is still reeling after dozens of armed extremists kidnapped hundreds of students out of their classes in broad daylight on the morning of March 7. Worried parents are now calling for government intervention, after days without any word from the abductors. As of March 13, the children have yet to be found. 
The AP reports that at least 287 students were abducted – with about 100 of them aged 12 or under – making it one of the largest kidnappings since the 2014 abduction of the Chibok girls, when 275 girls were taken from their school by Boko Haram.
The parallels between the two kidnappings have created more worry for parents, as even to this day nearly 100 of the Chibok girls remain missing. 
The March 7 kidnapping saw children taken from the school just as the day was starting, at around 8 a.m.. They were herded into the forest. It took authorities several hours to respond to the scene and begin a search operation, but it is unclear how deep into the forest the kidnappers went.
Locals have suggested that the abductors belong to a group of bandits who have been terrorizing remote villages in Nigeria’s northwest and central regions.
14-year-old Nigerian girl could declared a martyr. Nigeria is one of the places of most intense suffering for Christians in our day.
Bishop Wilfred Anagbe of Makurdi has called on the government to intercede on behalf of the Christian population, which he said is being targeted by these attacks. Bishop Anagbe told OSV: 
“The kidnappings, killings and destroying churches we are experiencing every day are aimed at finishing Christians. We are worried that despite such killings and kidnappings, the government has never arrested anyone. As a church, we now demand that the government act quickly to stop these vices that continue to dishearten people.”
I try hard not to hate anyone, but The Meghans sure know how to push the right buttons. 🤐🤬
Safety 1st: The UK is unsafe but African countries where Nigerian schoolgirls are kidnapped & Zika Zones for childbearing royals are no problem.
Tumblr media
Team Sussex: Global Court Jesters
Tumblr media
36 notes · View notes
brf-rumortrackinganon · 2 months
Text
For the anon who asked--
The Charlatan Duchess (TCD) was a blog back in the early Harkle/Sussex days that really focused on the contradictions and inconsistencies, if you will, that Meghan presented. Among their information, they had:
Receipts of edited articles and photographs.
Tea and gossip about the Sussexes from people in their circles.
Reports from people who were actually in/at/around where the Sussexes were doing engagements that contradicted their PR.
Meghan's old Tig articles and Instagram photos/posts that contradicted her Duchess narrative.
CopyKates and Diana 2.0 behaviors/outfits.
A running list of Meghan's fashion don'ts and royal mistakes.
TCD also had a pretty big compilation/collection of photographs and videos from Meghan's first pregnancy that pointed out things like varying bump sizes (bigger one day, smaller the next) and behaviors that were incongruent with normal pregnancy (like squatting down at 8 months pregnant with a huge belly and keeping her knees and ankles together).
They had a pretty big following here on Tumblr and there was a companion Facebook group. (It's not really clear if Tumblr was first or if FB was first.) You had to be a member of the Facebook group to see the FB comments, but the tumblr was wide open and anyone could see/send asks. I think the FB group and the tumblr blog were being run by two different people, or two different groups of people, because the FB and the tumblr didn't sound the same and didn't have the same tone in their coverage.
(I was on the FB group for a hot minute and it was so disgusting there that I noped out of it a couple days later. It was a very different place than the tumblr blog.)
At some point, the administrators of the TCD FB group began asking members for money/donations for charity, which people would send them, and they used relationships built within the TCD FB community to scam the members for more money, including selling their data (obtained from "friendships" and the membership questionnaire you had to complete to be added to the group). In April 2020ish, the TCD FB admins were doxxed. That information didn't match up to the information the FB group were told, and people started asking questions about the charity donations they had been sending to the admins.
I don't remember who the admins were pretending to be - maybe they were pretending to be British aristos?, but they ended up being an Air Force dependa and her mother, basically running a huge grift and scamming a lot of people out of money and data privacy.
Anyway, once the TCD FB fraud was uncovered, FB members turned on the admins. The admins turned on the group members and the FB drama spilled over to the TCD Tumblr group. The TCD Tumblr admin also got doxxed, began getting the same harassment as the FB admins - everyone thought they were the same person - and in early May 2020, the TCD tumblr admin deleted the blog to stop the harassment and doxxing.
So that's what happened to The Charlatan Duchess and that's why this side of tumblr (in general) gets nostalgic for her - a lot of us found each other through TCD and a lot of us had our own theories and opinions about the Sussexes validated through the receipts on TCD's blog.
You can still find some of the TCD posts floating around here on tumblr in the reblogs. Pretty much everyone who was around in 2017-2020 will have some TCD in their archives.
68 notes · View notes
skippyv20 · 12 days
Text
Long read, apologies for any grammar errors
This hysteria is getting out of control and is making the anti Sussex look somewhat deranged to an outsider. I’m just what I’m seeing and trying to bring the volume down.
I’ve seen Nigerians being called all kinds of things as being backwards as a result of practicing an unfounded vicious rumor of bestiality on females, when gender surgeries on childfen are on high demand in the west.
They’re are called corrupt, the poorest country in the world, no running water, electricity, kidnappings when human trafficking is on a large scale in the west, less we forget Epstein, Andrew and the other elites and lower elites. Epstein allegedly viciously SAed over 300 young girls. There’s a huge list of missing kids and adults in West? Where did they all go?
Yes, Nigeria like every other country needs help and by God’s grace the lord’s riches will solve all this unnecessary poverty wherever it exits.
Now, Meg’s 43% Nig, and as a Nigerian, I don’t believe, though I’ve gone to Nairaland to get peoples opinions on this visit and her so called heritage. People are more pro her, though there are some detractors with somr sense, though they easily drown them.
Her alleged new heritage is not a battle that a Caucasian will win. It’s best for Nigerians to believe whatever, and it explains how amongst other reason, colonization was easily done. It’s sad that some of my people can be got. People see a black, African, biracial in power and think they’ll be good for black folks. It’s one of the biggest scams in the world and black folks haven’t learned.
I didn’t really articulate myself on why Caucasians should stay out of this. It’s sort of a complex issue. I understand the Caucasians pov, but it’s up to Nigerians to accept it. Has anyone really seen that so called DNA? I have never heard anyone ask? It’s very impossible for a biracial to be 43% N, unless she has a one parent from Nigeria.
It tells a lot: Sussex drops her, but Nigeria welcomes her. I’m embarrassed to be Of Nigerian descent to be honest. I love that we live in the world where we can claim anything. I am now 25 % Antartican.
Imho, the best thing, would have been for people to voice their concerns, but ignore her. That’d have been the biggest humiliation. Just like low ratings of TV shows get canceled.
Once meg, announced she was Nigerian, I knew it wouldn’t have been long for her to claim physical territory in Nigeria. The rf should’ve been waiting and anticipated this, and put those titles in abeyance, and held on to the titles of their children and just said they were sorting things out. My gut is telling that it’s too late for that. It’s like not treating an infection early to prevent amputation of the foot.
Charles on the other hand is serving what?. All I hear from thr rf is the silly nonsense about who invited whom to stay where, who couldn’t see whom, and some other nonsense. When did GB, become like this? When have they lost the courage in acting right? Where is Churchill, Baldwin?
Edward the 8th and wallis could do whatever, but then the difference was that they were no longer part of the firm, kicked out of England, and didn’t leave on their own accord and visit at anytime like harry. That was a reality check. The RF has left this rogue, evil, scheming son get this vicious, and the price to pay is very painful.
Thank you.  The rumours you hear about Nigeria don’t come from this blog or other blogs here on Tumblr.  We have one focus, and that is Harry’s wife.  I do agree that we have a difficult time understanding the love anyone has for her.  But let me be clear….the fact that she is claiming to be 43% Nigerian hits us hard. (Note an author named Georgina Lawton claimed to have her DNA done and announced she was 43% Nigerian, not saying she isn’t, but rather it explains where Harry’s wife arrived at this, as usual she steals from others, including their DNA results).  She has claimed to be part Maltese as well, because a great great grandmother lived on the island of Malta.  She has claimed to be Jewish and Catholic.  She has implied she was Canadian when in fact she is American…I could go on and on.  This is what we all take issue with.  She uses and abuses, people and places, countries, religions etc.  She has always gotten away with these lies because no one would call her out.  We have worked so hard for so many years to expose her.  Now we finally are seeing results, people see what we see.  I am in complete agreement the BRF should have stopped this long ago, I shake my head as to why they have not.  I do appreciate all you have said, and again I will ponder.❤️
24 notes · View notes
saintmeghanmarkle · 2 months
Text
The Telegraph finally focuses on the Unsussexfuls & Misan Harriman's Photogate. The attacks on Catherine are hypocritical and disproportionate. When will media examine other past obviously botched photoshopped Sussex s with the same scrutiny? by u/wontyield
The Telegraph finally focuses on the Unsussexfuls & Misan Harriman's Photogate. 📸 🤥 📸The attacks on Catherine are hypocritical and disproportionate. When will media examine other past obviously botched photoshopped Sussex 📸s with the same scrutiny?
Original article link: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2024/03/13/meghan-pregnancy-photo-claim-doctored-willow-tree/
Archive link: https://archive.is/2024.03.13-095528/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2024/03/13/meghan-pregnancy-photo-claim-doctored-willow-tree/
The OSINT work of this sub has presented evidence of the botched edited Sussex photos for years. The media, both 🇬🇧 and 🇺🇸, have continued to ignore OBVIOUS deceit on part of the Sussexes and their minions, Liebrows Scobie and Misan Harriman. The media is complicit is Sussex 📸 scams. Major news outlets have continually propped up Sussexes lies by pushing their revisionist history via lies in articles and obviously edited images. 🕵️‍♀️
See link to Negative_Difference4's previous posts about the edited Sussex willow tree pregnancy announcement photo and other discrepancies in pinned comment.
Excerpts: One of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s own official portraits is said to have been edited with the insertion of a large willow tree.
The claim prompted accusations of hypocrisy after a source close to the Sussexes criticised the Princess of Wales, insisting that Meghan would “never” make a picture editing mistake and would have been “annihilated” for releasing a doctored family portrait.
However, an image released to accompany the announcement of Meghan’s pregnancy with her daughter Princess Lilibet on Valentine’s Day 2021 appears to have been heavily doctored, amid suggestions that a large willow tree was edited into the shot.
Mr Harriman took the picture with an iPad from his home in London and it was shared with no indication that it had been digitally altered.In 2022, he was asked during an appearance on BBC Radio 3 podcast Private Passions how he had created the photograph and admitted: “It’s amazing what you can do with technology.”
The presenter asked him: “They weren’t actually under a willow tree, they were lying outside in a meadow, weren’t they, Harry and Meghan, when you took the photograph of them?”
Mr Harriman said the image was his “most famous virtual shoot” as he described how he had used technology that allowed him to communicate with the Sussexes and tell them how to pose, before he remotely “pressed the shutter button” thousands of miles away.
‘Sussexes’ camp are hypocrites’
Angela Levin, Prince Harry’s biographer, told The Sun: “The Sussexes’ camp are huge hypocrites.”
A tree was doctored in their photograph to create a special backdrop so how dare their camp say anything about Catherine’s?”
THIS PART IS HILARIOUS!!!*🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Meghan spoke about her dislike of having certain features airbrushed out of photographs after posing for a People magazine cover in 2017.“
To this day, my pet peeve is when my skin tone is changed and my freckles are airbrushed out of a photoshoot,” she said.
😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶
There is no suggestion the Sussexes edited the photograph themselves.
A spokesman for the couple has denied commenting about the Princess’s picture. post link: https://ift.tt/gXdz5qD author: wontyield submitted: March 13, 2024 at 12:20PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.
38 notes · View notes
celticcrossanon · 2 months
Text
Anon: The AP is an American newspaper that withdrew Catherine’s photo due to evidence of photoshop.
Celta, this is incorrect information. The AP (Associated Press) is not an “American newspaper.” It’s a non-profit associated news agency est. over 150 yrs ago in the US, but now international in reach and coverage. In other words, it’s a news clearing house, so to speak, where news reporting (incl photos) by thousands of reporters/outlets all over the world is submitted and then distributed to various newspapers, TV networks, and online media.
The AP routinely requires news photos to pass high standards of “tech truth” (ie, no more than minor photoshopping, or none). This is a good thing. This went off the rails with Catherine’s photo because 1) it was NOT a news photo, per se, but a personal pic posted on a non-news IG acct (KP’s) and therefore should not have been subjected to this level of scrutiny, but 2) given the context of C’s recovery, it became news, and 3) the level of actual photoshopping (called the “mirage %”) was very low - in the teens.
Compare this, for example, with the level of photoshop manipulation found in the official group photo released by the Sussexes of Archie’s christening…the “mirage %” is a whopping 43%! So, H&M, prepare to have ALL of your pics analyzed and exposed as well (H’s “hair,” M’s “smooth” complexion, moonbumps, A/L’s “ginger” hair and “blue blue blue” eyes, etc). In particular, I can’t wait for the public analysis of your “QEII and PP meet infant Archie” photo lol! Be aware, too, that Sussex pics have been “killed,” as well, in the past by the AP (eg, the 2019 Sussex Christmas photo w A). I’d love to see a photoshop analysis of their family-of-four Christmas photo (w infant L being held up in the air by M).
IMHO, I do think that MM herself, or a Sussex surrogate, contacted someone at the AP to initiate the scrutiny of C’s pic. We already know she’s done this in the past (a/g Piers Morgan) by directly contacting the head of ITV when PM doubted her Oprah lies. Ultimately, PM was exonerated, though, and MM’s lies exposed. The same will happen here. 
Also, kudos to Lady Kinnaroch (sp?) for her intriguing tarot reading/theory that C deliberately masterminded this scrutiny of her innocent photo in order to catalyze equal scrutiny of MM’s pics. Catherine, the Queen of 3-D chess! I like this theory a lot! Let’s start turning over the slimy Sussex rocks and exposing them to the cleansing sunlight of Truth. If we’re lucky, it’ll set off a chain reaction leading to the exposure of their surrogacy/LoS scam.
*
Hi Nonny,
Thank you for the correct information about Associated Press.
I wish they would analyse all of the Harkle’s previous news photos - you know, the ones they put out while they were royals - and see if they reach those high standards. Personally I think AP came down hard just because the picture was put out by The Prince and Princess of Wales, but I could be wrong.
I also think this was instigated by Meghan, especially given the PR she has put out about how she would never do such a thing etc.
Is there any way the public can demand AP scrutinise a certain photograph?
I will tag Lady Kinrannoch so she sees your message to her: @ladykinrannoch
I would love to see the Harkles exposed for the fakes and hypocrites that they are. 
27 notes · View notes
amuseoffyre · 2 years
Text
After reading this post last night, ended up having a mental meander about Stede's whiteness and the way it informs his behaviour and actions.
Stede is a man born into an immense amount of privelege: upper-class, wealthy, white, with hereditary land and property. Even though he is targetted and abused by his peers, this doesn't change the fact that he is someone at the top of the social pecking order. People would look at him and recognise him for what he is. His wealth is visible and combined with the colour of his skin would immediately adjust peoples' perspectives of him.
Initially, the Revenge seems like something of an idyll: all of the crew are treated equally, paid a salary, allowed to speak their minds and talk things through as a crew. They can talk back to him and frequently do, offering opinions and criticisms to his face.
However, this changes the minute that the Navy comes anywhere near their little bubble. While he does it to try and prevent anyone being harmed, he immediately steps back into the white-dominated social codes he knows well.
Lucius, Buttons, the Swede and Black Pete are the only members of the crew allowed to sit at the table with the white Naval officers. Stede knows that this is the only acceptable option to the Navy and as much as he insists they are a crew, he is 100% aware that this blurring of the lines wouldn't be tolerated by Naval Officers, all of whom are upper class white men.
Meanwhile Roach, Olu and Frenchie are immediately pushed into the roles of servants and worse than that, Stede sits by and *lets* the English officers racially abuse his people, calling them savages and talking about them like they're not even there because... well, let's be frank about it, that's just how it was done in their society. Servants and slaves were there to be invisible, silent and ignored, treated like nothing more than tools.
While all of this is done with the threat of the Navy's force hanging over them and Stede's own childhood trauma wrapping around his throat like a noose, it says a great deal about Stede's awareness of both his own society and the perceptions within it.
He knows his crew can't behave as they do with him because of the colour of their skin. He disguises them in the roles that he knows his white peers would expect them to play while Pete is somehow suitable to play minor Royalty from Sussex simply because he's white.
And the thing is he doesn't *have* to say they're servants. We know this because we see it in a later episode: the party ship, where Olu is accepted by the party guests as the Crown Prince Azi of Egypt with Frenchie as his viceroy.
Olu and Frenchie still face racism from the rich white party guests, but the big difference between the two scenes is the kind of people they're dealing with. Frenchie has 'been in service for a minute' and knows how to manipulate the biases and racism of the white aristocratic party goers. He uses the limited things they know about Egypt (ie. pyramids, pharaohs, treasure) to scam them, playing on their ignorance for personal gain.
But Stede knows the people of his specific social class and has been raised with people like the Badmintons. Combined with the fact the Navy was one of the primary forces in colonisation of the British empire, he knows the way they see the world and specifically how they see anyone who isn't white: either as a threat or people to be subjugated.  
In a survival situation, he immediately retreats back into that social structure, acting as if he perceives the world the same way as they do.
98 notes · View notes
heir-less · 1 year
Text
RE: 2022 Is the Year We All Finally Got Tired of Narcissists
Joanna Weiss states in her article about Narcissists in 2022 that she grew irritated by the Harry & Meghan documentary during the 5th and 6th episodes. She claimed that it was of the same stuff that:
Turned Elon Musk into a terror on Twitter, that prompted Ye to up the ante of outrageous behavior until he crossed the line into blatant antisemitism, that sent Bankman-Fried from the top of the world to a Bahamian jail.
In the article, Meghan (Harry is mentioned just as much, but he didn't make the article's header or opening paragraph surprisingly) seems to be the catalyst for Weiss's theory. According to Weiss, Meghan thrives off the attention given to her post-royal exit—be that from her Netflix deal or Oprah—and Harry & Meghan was something of a vanity piece that presented Meghan in an uber-flattering light meant to stroke her ego and showcase her wealth and glamour. However, she doesn't think the Sussexes are malicious like Kanye or Trump she concludes:
. . . the Sussexes’ addiction to the public eye is benign — they seem tiresome, but genuinely well-intentioned — a narcissist’s constant quest for eyeballs and acclaim can get a lot more dangerous.
I feel that what's missing from this article is that it fails to actually describe how Meghan is a narcissist, a word that means more than just having an "addiction to the public eye", or how it resulted in her falling out of favour in the public eye. One bad review of the documentary doesn't mean much, especially when compared to the other big names mentioned in the article.
Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried are both in legal trouble after their once-lucrative scams fell apart; with Holmes having to serve an 11 prison sentence; YE and Elon have faced near-universal criticism for their current antics on social media, and Trump is on his way to political irrelevancy after his endorsed candidates underperformed during this year's elections. Weiss was smart enough to realize Meghan isn't on the same playing field as these others, but when compared to her other examples, Meghan seems more and more out of place. The article would have been stronger if she was excluded altogether because Meghan is just taking focus away from the main point of the article. The way it's been received is indicative of that, all anyone is talking about is how Meghan can be compared to Donald Trump in good faith, no one is interested in the article's thesis of how high-profile individuals destroy themselves through their quest to sieze and maintain the public eye.
To continue, I'm not sure this article was written in good faith. While Weiss doesn't read as someone with an obsessive hatred of Meghan, her selective recounting of the documentary does have me raising an eyebrow. The 5th and 6th episodes of Harry & Meghan, where Wiess states she reached the limits of the Sussexes ego, were some of the most intimate. They were the episodes where Meghan talked about her miscarriage and talked about how the harassment campaign has led to her living in constant fear for her life, that is not something a person with a huge ego would easily talk about as it conveys vulnerability. Nor her experiences with racism, trauma, and family woes. I find Weiss's characterization of the documentary as something "which suggests that there is no one more in love, no one more socially conscious, no one more aggrieved" to be totally inaccurate. The documentary is focused on Meghan and Harry's relationship, that in itself does not equate to narcissism or self-delusion.
I think it's interesting how Meghan's existence and her telling her story (twice), is enough for her to be branded an attention-seeking egoist when she's not on social media and attends public events and photoshoots sparingly, sometimes months at a time. It really raises the question, is Meghan a narcissist or are you just annoyed by her presence? Weiss answers this question within the first paragraph of her article.
30 notes · View notes
scorpioqueen1975 · 11 months
Text
When Sussex Baby Scam is trending....
Tumblr media
7 notes · View notes
redundant2 · 1 year
Text
New Smallbrook tea
"I’m hearing, on the grapevine, that several journalists have had enough. They are working together to get some answers."
Tumblr media
"The Palace announcement of Archie’s birth, placed on the easel outside Buckingham Palace, gave cause for concern. Why was the royal birth announcement for ‘Archie’ not signed?"
"Catherine’s baby birth announcements were signed, as normal. This is Royal protocol, after all. It is unbelievable that ‘Archie’ had to be satisfied with a printed announcement that nobody would dare put their names to. What was all that about?"
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
"They are claiming that Meghan Markle did not give birth to ‘Archie’. If they hadn’t got proof, they wouldn’t be going ahead with this. "
Tumblr media
"Because, make no mistake, the internet is going into meltdown, accusing the Palace of being complicit in the biggest Royal scam ever known in recent years. The nonsense of including persons on the Line of Succession that no Royal has ever met is preposterous."
Tumblr media
"We’ve all seen photos of the ‘wandering moonbump’ that had a life of its own. There’s no escaping the fact that her pregnancy was suspect."
Tumblr media
The wording on Archie's birth announcement:
"The Queen and the Royal Family are delighted at the news that Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex was safely delivered of a son at 0526am today.
"Her Royal Highness and her child are both doing well."
The wording on Prince George's birth announcement:
'Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cambridge was safely delivered of a son at 4.24pm today. Her Royal Highness and her child are both doing well.'
Hmmmm.
15 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
30 notes · View notes
Note
I 100% believe Meghan trolled/scammed the british monarchy and honestly I admire her guts for doing it. The brf deserves it, honestly. I just wish she focused less on attacking Kate, who’s the least deserving of them all of any kind of hate.
I don’t think she went into the marriage thinking that. By all appearances, Harry sold her a bill of goods he couldn’t deliver and she just made the best of it that she could.
I’m not sure that I would call what Meghan is doing scamming the BRF or trolling them. And people who call what the Sussexes are doing to the BRF “trolling”, well…
Tumblr media
Trolling isn’t wearing clothes named after the royal family or changing your permanent address on the same day your dad announces he’s evicted you. Trolling is throwing a gigantic July 4th party or claiming the fireworks show for Charles’s coronation was to celebrate Archie’s birthday or recognizing Nacho as Harry’s brother.
But maybe that’s just the elder millennial in me.
22 notes · View notes
skippyv20 · 4 months
Text
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Let’s see who they scam into getting a box….😂😂😂😂😂😂
So American of them to attend. I am telling you Taylor Swift will be the focus…..😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
29 notes · View notes
saintmeghanmarkle · 11 days
Text
Buying a Nigerian Princess title because the British one is about to be removed? by u/Winter-South-7448
Buying a Nigerian Princess title because the British one is about to be removed? So Markle is now a Nigerian Princess, enobled by 3 Nigerian Kings. Yes, well, whatever. Except that Markle somehow engineered this, it was not a spontaneous outpouring of love, she asked for it and got it, and that probably meant paying for it. I think she has been planning this Princess rubbish from when the whole Nigerian thing started way back around the time of her podcast, when she first started telling those lies about being 43% Nigerian. Remember this is Nigeria we are dealing with, corrupt, criminal, and proud founder of the Nigerian Prince email scams. My theory is that she bought her way into Nigerian royalty, paying off 3 so-called kings who are probably no more than impoverished tribal leaders, or 3 blokes from Nigerian central casting. And why orchestrate all this? Is it possible that she and her dimwit husband have been informed by the Royal Family that they will shortly lose their titles, and she is determined that she has to have a 'royal' title to keep her tattly little brand going. There has been talk recently of The King adopting the Scandinavian model of royalty, which is, if you leave the Kingdom and live overseas, you have to give up royal titles and privileges including your place in the line of succession. If that happens, they would be Mr. & Mrs. Mountbatten-Windsor. They could not even retain the Sussex name.I think this Nigerian Princess rubbish is evidence that Markle is scurrying around to try to get other royal credentials to replace the ones she is about to lose.Let's see what happens next. https://preview.redd.it/xfzk8jk9ee0d1.png?width=332&format=png&auto=webp&s=0965734462aa9d1e8f238e957183f3400cf5cba2​ post link: https://ift.tt/enU208W author: Winter-South-7448 submitted: May 14, 2024 at 03:59PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.
9 notes · View notes
celticcrossanon · 8 months
Note
Celta, someone who writes about the Royals on a social media platform just posted an entry saying he proof-read someone's book manuscript about the Sussexes' fake pregnancies and use of surrogates (name is Benjamin Smallbrook on Quora). Allegedly, the text is in the final stages before publication. That's all he's allowed to say for now. Obviously, take this info with salt. A suggestion for a tarot reading is does someone plan to publish an tell-all book about the fake pregnancies scam soon?
Hi Nonny,
I would love a book like that to be published. If the entry is true then I hope the book contains actual proof that can stand up in court and is not just a rehash of everything on social media.
I will read on this.
21 notes · View notes
Text
This day in history
Tumblr media
#10yrsago Kansas Universities can fire faculty for tweets that are “contrary to best interest of the University” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2013/12/19/kansas-board-of-regents-restricts-free-speech-for-academics/
#10yrsago Judge throws out Libyan rendered by UK spooks & CIA to Gaddafi for torture, because “it might embarrass America” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/20/libyan-rendition-claim-uk-interests
#10yrsago NSA and GCHQ targeted NGOs, charities, EU chief, Israeli defense minister for deep surveillance https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/20/gchq-targeted-aid-agencies-german-government-eu-commissioner
#10yrsago Oklahoma City cops charge Keystone XL protesters with “terrorism hoax” because their banner shed some glitter https://www.vice.com/en/article/xd5dxa/two-environmentalists-were-charged-with-terrorism-hoax-for-too-much-glitter-on-their-banner
#10yrsago Mother of three boys’ funny review for Kleenex multipacks https://www.amazon.com/review/RFWM0CFO0UMWY/?_encoding=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&linkCode=ur2&tag=downandoutint-20#RFWM0CFO0UMWY
#10yrsago Deriving cryptographic keys by listening to CPUs’ “coil whine” https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/12/new-attack-steals-e-mail-decryption-keys-by-capturing-computer-sounds/
#10yrsago Chief cable lobbyist: data caps were never about network congestion, always about profit https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Cable-Industry-Finally-Admits-Caps-Not-About-Congestion-122791
#5yrsago The audiophile MQA format really doesn’t have DRM, but that doesn’t mean it’s not on the toxic rainbow of locked tech https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/12/closed-proprietary-felonious-toxic-rainbow-locked-technology
#5yrsago The latest Facebook scandal might explain why Amazon wrongfully banned book-reviewers https://gizmodo.com/amazon-and-facebook-reportedly-had-a-secret-data-sharin-1831192148
#5yrsago Inside the funny accounting that lets the money-losing fracking industry claim to be profitable https://www.desmog.com/2018/12/18/fracking-finances-record-oil-production-fuzzy-math/
#5yrsago Regulating Airbnb drives down local rents (as well as house prices) https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/short-term-rentals-and-housing-market-quasi-experimental-evidence-airbnb-los-angeles
#5yrsago How Amazon’s crackdown on dirty sellers has made it easier for dirty sellers to kill good sellers’ accounts https://www.theverge.com/2018/12/19/18140799/amazon-marketplace-scams-seller-court-appeal-reinstatement
#5yrsago Not all “screen time” is created equal https://www.wired.com/story/year-in-review-tech-addiction-debate-all-wrong/
#5yrsago Master list of Facebook’s 2018 scandals https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-scandals-2018/
#5yrsago 760 flights diverted from Gatwick airport after drone scare, affecting 110,000 passengers https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-sussex-46623754
#1yrago 2023's public domain is a banger https://pluralistic.net/2022/12/20/free-for-2023/#oy-canada
4 notes · View notes
jerseydeanne · 2 years
Note
Hey JD I’m getting kind of frustrated it’s Max what’s the dealio with the Sussex is coming to the UK Megan must have balls of steel because I have a feeling that the UK citizens aren’t going to hold back on the name-calling the booing everything nobody wants them around and little leeches they are won’t go away do you or Kitty have any insight on what’s happening
Hey Max, Had a mental health day yesterday. Sorry to keep you waiting.
Don't worry about Sussex's hype. They are little fish in a goldfish bowl.
The Queen will be the highlight as she will ask the new Prime minister to create a government on her behalf.
MM and H are desperate to hold on to anything when they should be retreating and reflecting. A Narc can never be held down and will keep making mistakes. Let them. We'll laugh later.
Harry going to Germany is okay to support the Invictus games. It's not about them but the injured soldiers from ridiculous long wars that accomplished nothing. We should always help our military no matter what country they come from.
Remember, Harry is the puppet on Teflon strings, so we'll see what happens when he has to give a speech. His emotions will tell us plenty.
I did research on One World in 2017. Not a good organization. They were kicked out of Isreal as a scam company.
A little dig: Harry and Megatron aren't young, never struggled, and lived a life of privilege. How will they relate to the young people?
Love, JD 😜💋
17 notes · View notes