#tms 306 | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

theoliviaset · 2 years

Text

The Ableism Inherent in the Sysmed

So we've been seeing this recurrent claim pop up, that endogenic systems are ableist because of their claims that they experience plurality without being formed from trauma. Aaaaand it's got us annoyed to the point where we decided to write an essay about this. Mox has helped me (Faye) come up with a lot of this, so credit to her.

Our claim

Our claim is that accusing endogenic systems of being ableist by their mere existence is in fact ableism (or at the very least, fails as an argument and probably utilizes ableist assumptions). To make that claim, I'm going to need a straw man. Foxy, do you care to take the role?

I'm at the very least a stick man. Possibly brick. -Foxy

That a yes?

Duh. We rehearsed this whole bit all day at work.

SHHHH, you aren't supposed to tell them this isn't off the cuff and like, edited and stuff.

*rolls eyes*

Anyways, let's get started.

Claiming to have a disorder

Endogenic "systems" are ableist because they're pretending to have a disorder. A serious disorder that only results from trauma.

So this is an interesting one. You see, most endogenic systems we've come across don't generally claim to have DID/OSDD. But of course, that part is generally speaking ignored and the accusation is reiterated.

Here's the thing that takes some nuance though: even if DID/OSDD is caused exclusively by trauma, that doesn't stop an endogenic system from having it. We will for the moment ignore that dissociative disorders are placed next to the trauma disorders to reflect their close relationship (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 291), and that none of them have trauma requirements (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 291-307). I'm willing to believe that the kind of dissociation required to achieve memory barriers found in DID is caused by trauma, and that OSDD-1 (without amnesia) may likewise require trauma to cause distress (indeed, our collective distress is a byproduct of our different trauma responses).

But they have a trauma disorder. How are they supposed to have a trauma disorder without trauma?!?!

Endogenic systems claim that they were not formed from trauma. They do not however claim that they have no trauma. It actually seems pretty reasonable to expect a brain that is running a system of consciousnesses will react to overwhelming circumstances by increasing the severity of the pre-existing separations. When systems go through traumatic events, it makes sense that they would use the tools available to protect themselves. If you have a system prior to the trauma, then boom, you're endogenic (if you choose to label that way).

So endogenic systems have all rights to claim the disorder. Or they're not claiming a disorder at all. It's not ableist to claim an experience (plurality) that's also experienced by those with a disorder (DID/OSDD). No one is ableist for stimming when that's included in the diagnostic criteria of autism.

The Only Real(TM)(C)(R) Systems are DID/OSDD

No, the only way to be a system is if you have DID/OSDD though.

Why is that though? Criterion C of DID (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 292), the first sentence of OSDD (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 306), and the last essential feature of DID in the ICD-11 (ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics, 2022, "Essential Features" section) are all "distress" criteria. I.e. the thing that takes all symptoms together and makes it a disorder. Hell, the ICD-11 has a section that clearly states "The presence of two or more distinct personality states does not always indicate the presence of a mental disorder." (ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics, 2022, "Boundaries with Normality (Threshold)" section). Credit to The Lunastus Collective for finding and sharing the ICD-11 info (The Lunastus Collective, 2022).

Seriously, DID/OSDD are the only ways to be a system. Believing that you have multiple people in your head isn't normal!

There it is. That's the underlying assumption I think a lot of people seem to be making.

I'm so good at being a straw man. ;)

Eh, you and I both know that we've heard people make this claim. That you can't have a healthy mind (or at the very least a 'normal' one) if it's got a few people in it. Typically integration of the personality occurs in childhood, and infants begin the world with separate emotional self-states (Nijenhuis et al., 2004, "A Developmental Perspective of Dissociation" section). And so any deviance from typicality is a disorder yes?

Yeah, children don't get the normal integration of personality because of trauma.

You're using that word 'normal' though. That's a bit of a problem. You see, it's pretty ableist to label anything outside of the bounds of "normal" as a disorder. Hell, your beliefs (the actual Foxy, not the strawman bit she's doing) about how you got into our head would be considered delusions by most sysmeds, but tweak it ever so slightly to match up with a wider culturally accepted "normal" belief, and all of a sudden it's simply your spiritual beliefs right?

Hell, it reminds me of the discourse around trans people. We're considered to be "mentally ill" because our gender doesn't match up with society's expectations based upon our apparent biology. Worse still for us non-binary folk, as we're further talking about something weird when we talk about gender (and of course, further afield are xenogenders, of which none of us are, but fully support). Every step away from "normal" can be labeled more and more of a "mental illness" when those identities are simply a matter of self image. Of internal experience. Of qualia.

If any of those were to be termed as mental illnesses, it's pretty easy to see how ableist that is (as well as transphobic). Calling something a mental disorder just because it's different from the norm is ableist.

But DID/OSDD are disorders.

And we're going to go in a circle if your next point is that DID/OSDD are the only kinds of systems. And again, most endogenic systems we've met have specifically clarified that they do not have DID or OSDD. They merely claim that they are plural without having been formed from trauma.

They Just Don't Know their Trauma

Listen, I'm not even against endos. I just think that they're spreading misinformation by claiming not to have been formed from trauma. Just because they don't know their trauma, doesn't mean that they can go around claiming to be a system without trauma.

Again, that's ignoring the fact that many endogenic systems do know their own trauma. But now you're saying that a system (that you believe has a mental disorder) is not allowed to express their own life experiences?

Well yeah. They have a disorder that hides trauma. Therefore they wouldn't know if they had trauma because the disorder is doing its job.

So, because you think that a person is mentally ill, they can't be an expert on their own life? You do realize that's ableist as fuck right? To take away the autonomy of a person(s) in their ability to self relate and advocate because you hold that they have a mental disorder? That's how a metric fuck ton of psychiatric abuse occurs.

Furthermore this is an abuse tactic known as 'gaslighting' if you didn't know (Logsdon-Breakstone, 2012). You're telling people with (what you think is) a mental health disability that they can't be trusted with their own lives; that they can't possibly know themselves better than you.

And of course this is all ignoring the fact that there are systems with zero signs of trauma. It doesn't make a great deal of sense to tell a system who doesn't lose time, have amnesia, lose control of their thoughts or actions, have flashbacks, get hypervigilant, or have an exaggerated fear response, that in spite of none of those signs, they must secretly have trauma.

They're Just Faking It

Well if they don't have all of those symptoms, then they're just faking it.

And now we get to my favorite bit of ableism. This can go one of two ways honestly. First and foremost, people have been denied healthcare, resources, and even simple safety because others claim that their experiences are a lie; that they don't "look disabled" enough. Know that whatever outward sign of plurality you hold up as a requirement for plurality, you will exclude those with the disorder, including those that are straight up diagnosed (not to say that self-diagnosis is in any way shape or form invalid or lesser, but if an officially certified as capable of certifying someone officially "multiple" did it, then that should be at least enough for you).

Hey hey hey, I'm not saying that they're lying. I'm saying that they're mistaking their symptoms for plurality.

Aaaand that's' the other way.

Almost like we rehearsed this conversation before typing it up. ;)

Shhhh. Anyways, yeah, that's the other way it seems to be going. More gaslighting. If you're attempting to tell an ostensibly crazy person that they are mistaken about their experiences, you're doing textbook gaslighting. Which is ableist as fuck.

Conclusion

Overall, I think that anyone who wants to accuse endogenic systems of being ableist needs to stop for a moment and really think about what they're doing. Are they misunderstanding what the endogenic system is trying to communicate? Are they presuming that plurality itself is a disorder, and if so why? Are they just trying to gaslight people? Do they presume that atypical minds are incapable of deciding for themselves how they view themselves?

I may have stretched the use of ableism here, but I think it's still applicable. The attacks we've seen on endogenic systems so often seem to be built upon either the idea that plurality itself is a mental disorder, because having more than one person in one's head is "crazy." Or they are gaslighty attempts at weaponizing mental health disabilities against someone. In either case, fucking not cool.

-Faye of the Olivia Set

Citations

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5 (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. (2022, February). ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Retrieved February 25, 2022, from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1829103493

The Lunastus Collective, T. L. C. [@thelunastusco]. (2022, February 24). TLC 🔞 ominous finger snapping on [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/thelunastusco/status/1496742218954018818?s=20&t=flSHQkxLfx1w2hDWDq7PmA

Nijenhuis, E. R. S., van der Hart, O., & Steele, K. (2004). Trauma Information Pages, Articles: Ellert Nijenhuis, et al (2004). Trauma Information Pages, Articles Ellert Nijenhuis, et al (2004). Retrieved February 25, 2022, from http://www.trauma-pages.com/a/nijenhuis-2004.php

Logsdon-Breakstone, S. (2012, February 16). Cosmo, Gaslighting, and How We See “Crazy” – Persephone Magazine. Cosmo, Gaslighting, and How We See “Crazy” – Persephone Magazine. Retrieved February 25, 2022, from https://persephonemagazine.com/2012/02/cosmo-gaslighting-and-how-we-see-crazy/

#plural system #pluralgang #plurality #plural #endogenic #syscourse #actually plural

456 notes · View notes

kitkatpancakestack · 3 years

Text

Buck & Eddie and the significance of forgiveness

Okay, so while I have the single brain cell, I have to share more hiatus rewatch analytical thoughts. The hill I have chosen to die on today is: forgiveness and unconditionally being enough for the right person, as exemplified through the lawsuit arc and its subsequent events. And yes, I will be comparing this to a hamburger, so just deal with that.

Sticking with the hamburger analogy, the bottom bun is the moment in 306 when Eddie and Buck have their moment of reconciliation. Eddie forgives Buck for everything and they hug it out. With nothing more to compare it to, this scene just gives you the warm butterflies of two really close people working things out, which we love to see.

HOWEVER, when you add in all the hamburger fillings, things get a little deeper. May I present the moment in 308, when Eddie and Bobby have their heart to heart in the firehouse. Eddie's whole deal is feeling that he inherently was not enough for Shannon, that even though he forgave her for everything and was ready to give all of himself to her again, he would never be enough, and she was always going to leave him. Which really highlights how much of a big deal him forgiving Buck was in the previous scene. Buck is already constantly paralleled to Shannon, so we have that to work off of, and here he has assumed a place in Eddie's life where, if removed, the loss Eddie would feel would be significant and life up-ending. To think that Eddie's hurt stemmed from the fact that he thought he again wasn't inherently enough for someone important to him to stick around (after giving his whole ass self to Buck, including trust in his son) and we get this vulnerability between him and Bobby after the context of him forgiving Buck in 306? WOW.

NOW, we cap it off with the top bun, or what will go down in the archives of fandom history as The Kitchen Scene(TM). Leading up to this moment, we now understand Eddie's biggest fear is doing everything right but he himself not being worthy or enough for the people he cares most about in his life. We also know, as shown in the Kitchen Scene(TM), that Buck has really been spending time considering the impact of his actions on both Eddie and Christopher and how much he compromised his spot in that family and that family's well-being. During the Kitchen Scene(TM), it's all about Buck taking accountability for that and forcing Eddie to confront the fact that he deserve someone who shows up, he deserves an explanation, he should hold those around him to a higher standard, and he should expect more from those he cares bout, because Buck wants him to realize that he is inherently worthy.

It's the fact that these 3 events happen in successive episodes (barring Athena Begins, but I hold that episode separate outside the main events). Just . . . I will never be over their relationship. The way they love each other is unheard of and unseen and unparalleled. It's the standard that everyone should strive for and the ideal. They heal each other and push each other to be better and tell each other what they need to hear. Objectively, even without my buddie hat on, it's just so freaking beautiful, and I don't understand how people can't root for that kind of perfect, comprehensive, layered storytelling.

Your honor, I rest my case.

#if my love isn't like their love then I don't want it #they heal each other #they help each other #they support each other selflessly #evan buckley #eddie diaz #buddie #K spirals

72 notes · View notes

starrypawz · 2 years

Text

I posted 19,974 times in 2021

1972 posts created (10%)

18002 posts reblogged (90%)

For every post I created, I reblogged 9.1 posts.

I added 1,958 tags in 2021

#fhr - 474 posts

#tma - 358 posts

#fallen hero - 269 posts

#the magnus archives - 154 posts

#gerry keay - 143 posts

#sidestep ronan brown - 138 posts

#tma nemo - 133 posts

#gerard keay - 116 posts

#fallen hero rebirth - 90 posts

#twc - 83 posts

Longest Tag: 140 characters

#soph. ant. 519 hades however seeks similar laws for all ὁμῶς ὅ γ᾽ Ἅιδης τοὺς νόμους τούτους ποθεῖ. the kind of person who has no chill knows

My Top Posts in 2021

246 notes • Posted 2021-09-28 23:35:09 GMT

Found this hoodie yesterday, had to shitpost

249 notes • Posted 2021-08-04 21:10:19 GMT

tumblr_video

-attempts to create meme before the hype is gone-

306 notes • Posted 2021-04-01 22:37:53 GMT

I do love the various I SHIP IT moments you get in this game

320 notes • Posted 2021-01-24 00:17:22 GMT

Since my post about Olivers GOTH VIBES (tm) is picking up again

Gerry one day encounters Oliver in passing, like idk somehow he walks past the crystal shop he worked in for a while. Gerry is like really feeling very ‘I’m on point, I’m so Goth today, I am peak Goth, my blacks are immaculate and my platforms are high and my trenchcoat is just dramatic enough,’ and then just catches the briefest glimpse of Oliver and then is like ‘Dammit I’ll never be as goth as him’

367 notes • Posted 2021-09-22 08:15:10 GMT

Get your Tumblr 2021 Year in Review →

#my 2021 tumblr year in review #your tumblr year in review

5 notes · View notes

ask-triple-trouble-threat · 3 years

Note

(Annoying Nerd) Hi Reginald Here's some stas of Jamie Moyer. He played over 20 years. Feel free to not look away, it was annoyingly amazing.

Standard PitchingMore Stats Glossary · Hide Partial · Show Minors · SHARE · CSV · PRE · LINK · More Tools

Minors

Game Logs [+]

Splits [+]

HR Log

vs. Batter

Finders [+]

Year Age Tm Lg W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF ERA+ WHIP H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9 SO/BB Awards

1986 23 CHC NL 7 4 .636 5.05 16 16 0 1 1 0 87.1 107 52 49 10 42 1 45 3 3 3 395 80 1.706 11.0 1.0 4.3 4.6 1.07

1987 24 CHC NL 12 15 .444 5.10 35 33 1 1 0 0 201.0 210 127 114 28 97 9 147 5 2 11 899 83 1.527 9.4 1.3 4.3 6.6 1.52

1988 25 CHC NL 9 15 .375 3.48 34 30 1 3 1 0 202.0 212 84 78 20 55 7 121 4 0 4 855 105 1.322 9.4 0.9 2.5 5.4 2.20

1989 26 TEX AL 4 9 .308 4.86 15 15 0 1 0 0 76.0 84 51 41 10 33 0 44 2 0 1 337 82 1.539 9.9 1.2 3.9 5.2 1.33

1990 27 TEX AL 2 6 .250 4.66 33 10 6 1 0 0 102.1 115 59 53 6 39 4 58 4 0 1 447 85 1.505 10.1 0.5 3.4 5.1 1.49

1991 28 STL NL 0 5 .000 5.74 8 7 1 0 0 0 31.1 38 21 20 5 16 0 20 1 1 2 142 65 1.723 10.9 1.4 4.6 5.7 1.25

1993 30 BAL AL 12 9 .571 3.43 25 25 0 3 1 0 152.0 154 63 58 11 38 2 90 6 1 1 630 130 1.263 9.1 0.7 2.3 5.3 2.37

1994 31 BAL AL 5 7 .417 4.77 23 23 0 0 0 0 149.0 158 81 79 23 38 3 87 2 0 1 631 105 1.315 9.5 1.4 2.3 5.3 2.29

1995 32 BAL AL 8 6 .571 5.21 27 18 3 0 0 0 115.2 117 70 67 18 30 0 65 3 0 0 483 92 1.271 9.1 1.4 2.3 5.1 2.17

1996 33 TOT AL 13 3 .813 3.98 34 21 1 0 0 0 160.2 177 86 71 23 46 5 79 2 1 3 703 126 1.388 9.9 1.3 2.6 4.4 1.72

1996 33 BOS AL 7 1 .875 4.50 23 10 1 0 0 0 90.0 111 50 45 14 27 2 50 1 1 2 405 113 1.533 11.1 1.4 2.7 5.0 1.85

1996 33 SEA AL 6 2 .750 3.31 11 11 0 0 0 0 70.2 66 36 26 9 19 3 29 1 0 1 298 150 1.203 8.4 1.1 2.4 3.7 1.53

1997 34 SEA AL 17 5 .773 3.86 30 30 0 2 0 0 188.2 187 82 81 21 43 2 113 7 0 3 787 116 1.219 8.9 1.0 2.1 5.4 2.63

1998 35 SEA AL 15 9 .625 3.53 34 34 0 4 3 0 234.1 234 99 92 23 42 2 158 10 1 3 974 131 1.178 9.0 0.9 1.6 6.1 3.76

1999 36 SEA AL 14 8 .636 3.87 32 32 0 4 0 0 228.0 235 108 98 23 48 1 137 9 0 3 945 130 1.241 9.3 0.9 1.9 5.4 2.85 CYA-6

2000 37 SEA AL 13 10 .565 5.49 26 26 0 0 0 0 154.0 173 103 94 22 53 2 98 3 1 4 678 83 1.468 10.1 1.3 3.1 5.7 1.85

2001 38 SEA AL 20 6 .769 3.43 33 33 0 1 0 0 209.2 187 84 80 24 44 4 119 10 0 1 851 122 1.102 8.0 1.0 1.9 5.1 2.70 CYA-4

2002 39 SEA AL 13 8 .619 3.32 34 34 0 4 2 0 230.2 198 89 85 28 50 4 147 9 0 3 931 128 1.075 7.7 1.1 2.0 5.7 2.94

2003 40 SEA AL 21 7 .750 3.27 33 33 0 1 0 0 215.0 199 83 78 19 66 3 129 8 0 0 897 132 1.233 8.3 0.8 2.8 5.4 1.95 AS,CYA-5

2004 41 SEA AL 7 13 .350 5.21 34 33 1 1 0 0 202.0 217 127 117 44 63 3 125 11 0 1 888 87 1.386 9.7 2.0 2.8 5.6 1.98

2005 42 SEA AL 13 7 .650 4.28 32 32 0 1 0 0 200.0 225 99 95 23 52 2 102 8 0 3 868 98 1.385 10.1 1.0 2.3 4.6 1.96

2006 43 TOT MLB 11 14 .440 4.30 33 33 0 2 1 0 211.1 228 110 101 33 51 5 108 5 1 3 894 105 1.320 9.7 1.4 2.2 4.6 2.12

2006 43 SEA AL 6 12 .333 4.39 25 25 0 2 1 0 160.0 179 85 78 25 44 3 82 3 1 3 685 101 1.394 10.1 1.4 2.5 4.6 1.86

2006 43 PHI NL 5 2 .714 4.03 8 8 0 0 0 0 51.1 49 25 23 8 7 2 26 2 0 0 209 117 1.091 8.6 1.4 1.2 4.6 3.71

2007 44 PHI NL 14 12 .538 5.01 33 33 0 1 0 0 199.1 222 118 111 30 66 3 133 5 0 2 867 91 1.445 10.0 1.4 3.0 6.0 2.02

2008 45 PHI NL 16 7 .696 3.71 33 33 0 0 0 0 196.1 199 85 81 20 62 4 123 11 0 3 841 118 1.329 9.1 0.9 2.8 5.6 1.98

2009 46 PHI NL 12 10 .545 4.94 30 25 1 0 0 0 162.0 177 91 89 27 43 1 94 10 1 1 699 85 1.358 9.8 1.5 2.4 5.2 2.19

2010 47 PHI NL 9 9 .500 4.84 19 19 0 2 1 0 111.2 103 64 60 20 20 0 63 6 0 0 460 84 1.101 8.3 1.6 1.6 5.1 3.15

24 Seasons 267 204 .567 4.24 686 628 15 33 10 0 4020.1 4156 2036 1892 *511* 1137 67 2405 144 12 57 17102 104 1.317 9.3 1.1 2.5 5.4 2.12

162 Game Avg. 14 11 .567 4.24 36 32 1 2 1 0 208 215 105 98 26 59 3 124 7 1 3 885 104 1.317 9.3 1.1 2.5 5.4 2.12

Lg W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF ERA+ WHIP H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9 SO/BB Awards

SEA (11 yrs) 145 87 .625 3.97 324 323 1 20 6 0 2093.0 2100 995 924 261 524 29 1239 79 3 25 8802 113 1.254 9.0 1.1 2.3 5.3 2.36

PHI (5 yrs) 56 40 .583 4.55 123 118 1 3 1 0 720.2 750 383 364 105 198 10 439 34 1 6 3076 96 1.315 9.4 1.3 2.5 5.5 2.22

CHC (3 yrs) 28 34 .452 4.42 85 79 2 5 2 0 490.1 529 263 241 58 194 17 313 12 5 18 2149 90 1.475 9.7 1.1 3.6 5.7 1.61

BAL (3 yrs) 25 22 .532 4.41 75 66 3 3 1 0 416.2 429 214 204 52 106 5 242 11 1 2 1744 108 1.284 9.3 1.1 2.3 5.2 2.28

TEX (2 yrs) 6 15 .286 4.74 48 25 6 2 0 0 178.1 199 110 94 16 72 4 102 6 0 2 784 84 1.520 10.0 0.8 3.6 5.1 1.42

STL (1 yr) 0 5 .000 5.74 8 7 1 0 0 0 31.1 38 21 20 5 16 0 20 1 1 2 142 65 1.723 10.9 1.4 4.6 5.7 1.25

BOS (1 yr) 7 1 .875 4.50 23 10 1 0 0 0 90.0 111 50 45 14 27 2 50 1 1 2 405 113 1.533 11.1 1.4 2.7 5.0 1.85

AL (16 yrs) AL 183 125 .594 4.10 470 424 11 25 7 0 2778.0 2839 1369 1267 343 729 40 1633 97 5 31 11735 110 1.284 9.2 1.1 2.4 5.3 2.24

NL (9 yrs) NL 84 79 .515 4.53 216 204 4 8 3 0 1242.1 1317 667 625 168 408 27 772 47 7 26 5367 93 1.389 9.5 1.2 3.0 5.6 1.89

Year Age Tm Lg IP GS R Rrep Rdef aLI RAR WAR Salary Awards

1986 23 CHC NL 87.1 16 52 58 -4 1.2 6 0.7 $60,000

1987 24 CHC NL 201.0 33 127 135 -11 1.1 8 0.9 $70,000

1988 25 CHC NL 202.0 30 84 113 -4 1.0 29 3.3 $142,500

1989 26 TEX AL 76.0 15 51 44 0 1.0 -7 -0.8 $205,000

1990 27 TEX AL 102.1 10 59 60 2 .8 1 -0.1 $340,000

1991 28 STL NL 31.1 7 21 16 1 .9 -5 -0.5 $200,000

1993 30 BAL AL 152.0 25 63 91 8 1.0 28 2.7 $200,000

1994 31 BAL AL 149.0 23 81 101 9 1.0 20 1.8 $725,000

1995 32 BAL AL 115.2 18 70 76 4 .9 6 0.4 $1,100,000

1996 33 BOS AL 90.0 10 50 70 -5 .7 20 1.4 $825,000

1996 33 SEA AL 70.2 11 36 49 3 .9 13 1.1 $

1997 34 SEA AL 188.2 30 82 119 1 1.0 37 3.7 $1,700,000

1998 35 SEA AL 234.1 34 99 152 -3 .9 53 5.2 $2,000,000

1999 36 SEA AL 228.0 32 108 171 -9 1.0 63 5.7 $2,300,000 CYA-6

2000 37 SEA AL 154.0 26 103 99 3 .9 -4 -0.4 $6,000,000

2001 38 SEA AL 209.2 33 84 114 15 .9 30 3.0 $6,500,000 CYA-4

2002 39 SEA AL 230.2 34 89 142 1 .9 53 5.3 $6,500,000

2003 40 SEA AL 215.0 33 83 123 9 .9 40 3.9 $6,500,000 AS,CYA-5

2004 41 SEA AL 202.0 33 127 134 1 1.0 7 0.6 $7,000,000

2005 42 SEA AL 200.0 32 99 126 -4 .9 27 2.6 $8,000,000

2006 43 SEA AL 160.0 25 85 102 0 .9 17 1.7 $5,500,000

2006 43 PHI NL 51.1 8 25 34 -1 .9 9 0.9 $

2007 44 PHI NL 199.1 33 118 126 2 1.0 8 0.7 $6,500,000

2008 45 PHI NL 196.1 33 85 115 5 1.0 30 3.1 $6,000,000

2009 46 PHI NL 162.0 25 91 97 0 .9 6 0.5 $6,500,000

2010 47 PHI NL 111.2 19 64 63 1 .8 -1 -0.1 $8,000,000

24 Seasons 4020.1 628 2036 2530 24 .9 494 47.3 $82,867,500

Lg IP GS R Rrep Rdef aLI RAR WAR Salary Awards

SEA (11 yrs) 2093.0 323 995 1331 17 .9 336 32.4 $52,000,000

PHI (5 yrs) 720.2 118 383 435 7 .9 52 5.1 $27,000,000

CHC (3 yrs) 490.1 79 263 306 -19 1.1 43 4.9 $272,500

BAL (3 yrs) 416.2 66 214 268 21 1.0 54 4.9 $2,025,000

TEX (2 yrs) 178.1 25 110 104 2 .9 -6 -0.9 $545,000

STL (1 yr) 31.1 7 21 16 1 .9 -5 -0.5 $200,000

BOS (1 yr) 90.0 10 50 70 -5 .7 20 1.4 $825,000

Postseason PitchingPostseason Gamelog · Glossary · SHARE · CSV · PRE · LINK · More Tools

Year Age Tm Lg Series Rslt Opp W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9 SO/BB

1997 34 SEA AL ALDS L BAL 0 1 .000 5.79 1 1 0 0 0 0 4.2 5 3 3 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 19 1.286 9.6 1.9 1.9 3.9 2.00

2001 38 SEA AL ALDS W CLE 2 0 1.000 1.50 2 2 0 0 0 0 12.0 8 2 2 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 45 0.833 6.0 0.0 1.5 7.5 5.00

2001 38 SEA AL ALCS L NYY 1 0 1.000 2.57 1 1 0 0 0 0 7.0 4 2 2 1 1 0 5 1 0 0 26 0.714 5.1 1.3 1.3 6.4 5.00

2007 44 PHI NL NLDS L COL 0 0 1.50 1 1 0 0 0 0 6.0 5 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 24 1.167 7.5 0.0 3.0 3.0 1.00

2008 45 PHI NL NLDS W MIL 0 1 .000 4.50 1 1 0 0 0 0 4.0 4 2 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 18 1.750 9.0 0.0 6.8 6.8 1.00

2008 45 PHI NL NLCS W LAD 0 1 .000 40.50 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.1 6 6 6 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 11 4.500 40.5 6.8 0.0 13.5

2008 45 PHI NL WS W TBR 0 0 4.26 1 1 0 0 0 0 6.1 5 3 3 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 25 0.947 7.1 0.0 1.4 7.1 5.00

4 Seasons (7 Series) 3 3 .500 4.14 8 8 0 0 0 0 41.1 37 19 19 3 10 0 29 2 0 1 168 1.137 8.1 0.7 2.2 6.3 2.90

2 NLDS 0 1 .000 2.70 2 2 0 0 0 0 10.0 9 3 3 0 5 0 5 0 0 1 42 1.400 8.1 0.0 4.5 4.5 1.00

2 ALDS 2 1 .667 2.70 3 3 0 0 0 0 16.2 13 5 5 1 3 0 12 0 0 0 64 0.960 7.0 0.5 1.6 6.5 4.00

1 ALCS 1 0 1.000 2.57 1 1 0 0 0 0 7.0 4 2 2 1 1 0 5 1 0 0 26 0.714 5.1 1.3 1.3 6.4 5.00

1 NLCS 0 1 .000 40.50 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.1 6 6 6 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 11 4.500 40.5 6.8 0.0 13.5

1 WS 0 0 4.26 1 1 0 0 0 0 6.1 5 3 3 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 25 0.947 7.1 0.0 1.4 7.1 5.00

Standard BattingMore Stats Glossary · Hide Partial · Show Minors · SHARE · CSV · PRE · LINK · More Tools

Minors

Game Logs [+]

Splits [+]

HR Log

vs. Pitcher

Finders [+]

Year Age Tm Lg G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+ TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB Pos Awards

1986 23 CHC NL 16 30 22 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 .091 .231 .091 .322 -10 2 1 0 4 0 0 1

1987 24 CHC NL 39 75 61 3 14 1 0 0 3 0 0 6 17 .230 .294 .246 .540 44 15 0 0 7 1 0 1

1988 25 CHC NL 34 71 60 4 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 25 .083 .127 .100 .227 -35 6 2 0 8 0 0 1

1989 26 TEX AL 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1990 27 TEX AL 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1991 28 STL NL 8 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 .000 .111 .000 .111 -66 0 0 0 0 0 0 /1

1993 30 BAL AL 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1994 31 BAL AL 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1995 32 BAL AL 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1996 33 TOT AL 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1996 33 BOS AL 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1996 33 SEA AL 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1997 34 SEA AL 30 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 .667 77 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

1998 35 SEA AL 34 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -100 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1999 36 SEA AL 32 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 .500 .667 .500 1.167 203 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 CYA-6

2000 37 SEA AL 26 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 -100 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2001 38 SEA AL 33 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -100 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 CYA-4

2002 39 SEA AL 34 5 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 .200 .200 .200 .400 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

2003 40 SEA AL 33 6 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .400 .400 .400 .800 118 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 AS,CYA-5

2004 41 SEA AL 34 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 .500 .500 .500 1.000 166 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

2005 42 SEA AL 32 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -100 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

2006 43 TOT MLB 33 25 21 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 .095 .136 .095 .232 -40 2 0 0 3 0 0 1

2006 43 SEA AL 25 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .333 .333 .333 .667 76 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

2006 43 PHI NL 8 22 18 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 .056 .105 .056 .161 -58 1 0 0 3 0 0 /1

2007 44 PHI NL 34 83 73 4 9 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 26 .123 .147 .151 .297 -24 11 1 0 8 0 0 1

2008 45 PHI NL 33 70 51 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 7 19 .078 .190 .098 .288 -22 5 0 0 12 0 0 1

2009 46 PHI NL 30 59 42 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 21 .119 .240 .119 .359 -1 5 1 1 9 1 0 1

2010 47 PHI NL 19 35 26 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 13 .077 .172 .077 .249 -30 2 0 0 6 0 0 1

24 Seasons 691 485 387 23 49 5 0 0 13 0 0 34 142 .127 .198 .140 .338 -9 54 5 1 61 2 0

162 Game Avg. 162 114 91 5 11 1 0 0 3 0 0 8 33 .127 .198 .140 .338 -9 13 1 0 14 0 0

G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+ TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB Pos Awards

SEA (11 yrs) 324 31 26 1 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 7 .269 .296 .269 .566 52 7 0 0 4 0 0

PHI (5 yrs) 124 269 210 12 21 3 0 0 6 0 0 19 84 .100 .177 .114 .292 -22 24 2 1 38 1 0

CHC (3 yrs) 89 176 143 10 21 2 0 0 4 0 0 13 47 .147 .217 .161 .377 4 23 3 0 19 1 0

BAL (3 yrs) 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TEX (2 yrs) 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

STL (1 yr) 8 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 .000 .111 .000 .111 -66 0 0 0 0 0 0

BOS (1 yr) 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AL (16 yrs) 470 31 26 1 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 7 .269 .296 .269 .566 52 7 0 0 4 0 0

NL (9 yrs) 221 454 361 22 42 5 0 0 10 0 0 33 135 .116 .191 .130 .322 -13 47 5 1 57 2 0

Player Value--Batters WAR: 8+ MVP, 5+ A-S, 2+ Strtr, 0-2 Sub, < 0 Repl. · Glossary · SHARE · CSV · PRE · LINK · More Tools

Year Age Tm Lg PA Rbat Rbaser Rroe Rdp Rfield Rpos Rrep RAR WAR oRAR oWAR dWAR Salary Pos Awards

1986 23 CHC NL 30 -3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0.1 1 0.1 0.0 $60,000 1

1987 24 CHC NL 75 -5 0 0 0 0 8 2 5 0.5 5 0.5 0.0 $70,000 1

1988 25 CHC NL 71 -10 0 0 0 0 6 2 -2 -0.4 -2 -0.2 -0.2 $142,500 1

1991 28 STL NL 9 -2 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 -0.1 -1 -0.1 0.0 $200,000 /1

1997 34 SEA AL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $1,700,000 1

1998 35 SEA AL 2 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -0.1 -1 -0.1 0.0 $2,000,000 1

1999 36 SEA AL 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.1 1 0.1 0.0 $2,300,000 1 CYA-6

2000 37 SEA AL 2 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -0.1 -1 -0.1 0.0 $6,000,000 1

2001 38 SEA AL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $6,500,000 1 CYA-4

2002 39 SEA AL 5 -1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $6,500,000 1

2003 40 SEA AL 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.1 1 0.1 0.0 $6,500,000 1 AS,CYA-5

2004 41 SEA AL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $7,000,000 1

2005 42 SEA AL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $8,000,000 1

2006 43 SEA AL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $5,500,000 1

2006 43 PHI NL 22 -4 0 0 0 0 2 1 -1 -0.1 -1 -0.1 0.0 $ /1

2007 44 PHI NL 83 -14 0 -1 0 0 9 2 -4 -0.4 -4 -0.4 0.0 $6,500,000 1

2008 45 PHI NL 70 -9 0 0 0 0 6 2 -1 -0.2 -1 -0.1 -0.1 $6,000,000 1

2009 46 PHI NL 59 -6 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 0.1 1 0.1 0.0 $6,500,000 1

2010 47 PHI NL 35 -5 -1 0 0 0 4 1 -1 -0.1 -1 -0.1 0.0 $8,000,000 1

18 Seasons 485 -60 -1 -1 0 0 47 12 -3 -0.6 -3 -0.3 -0.3 $79,472,500

Lg PA Rbat Rbaser Rroe Rdp Rfield Rpos Rrep RAR WAR oRAR oWAR dWAR Salary Pos Awards

SEA (10 yrs) 31 -2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $52,000,000

PHI (5 yrs) 269 -38 -1 -1 0 0 27 7 -6 -0.7 -6 -0.6 -0.1 $27,000,000

CHC (3 yrs) 176 -18 0 0 0 0 17 5 4 0.2 4 0.4 -0.2 $272,500

STL (1 yr) 9 -2 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 -0.1 -1 -0.1 0.0 $200,000

Postseason BattingPostseason Gamelog · Glossary · SHARE · CSV · PRE · LINK · More Tools

Year Age Tm Lg Series Opp Rslt G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB

2007 44 PHI NL NLDS COL L 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0

2008 45 PHI NL NLDS MIL W 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0

2008 45 PHI NL NLCS LAD W 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2008 45 PHI NL WS TBR W 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Seasons (4 Series) 4 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 NLDS 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NLCS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 WS 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Standard FieldingMore Stats Glossary · Hide Partial · SHARE · CSV · PRE · LINK · More Tools

Year Tm Lg Age Pos G GS CG Inn Ch PO A E DP Fld% Rdrs Rdrs/yr RF/9 RF/G lgFld% lgRF9 lgRFG SB CS CS% PO Awards

1986 CHC NL 23 P 16 16 1 87.1 24 2 22 0 0 1.000 2.47 1.50 .953 1.94 1.94 10 5 33% 2

1987 CHC NL 24 P 35 33 1 201.0 56 15 37 4 3 .929 2.33 1.49 .956 1.91 1.90 25 12 32% 0

1988 CHC NL 25 P 34 30 3 202.0 57 11 45 1 3 .982 2.50 1.65 .954 1.96 1.96 26 14 35% 0

1989 TEX AL 26 P 15 15 1 76.0 19 5 14 0 2 1.000 2.25 1.27 .958 1.87 1.85 6 4 40% 2

1990 TEX AL 27 P 33 10 1 102.1 20 6 14 0 2 1.000 1.76 0.61 .951 1.78 1.76 9 7 44% 4

1991 STL NL 28 P 8 7 0 31.1 5 0 5 0 0 1.000 1.44 0.63 .952 1.87 1.85 8 3 27% 0

1993 BAL AL 30 P 25 25 3 152.0 40 14 25 1 1 .975 2.31 1.56 .952 1.79 1.78 5 6 55% 1

1994 BAL AL 31 P 23 23 0 149.0 29 12 17 0 1 1.000 1.75 1.26 .954 1.72 1.71 7 3 30% 0

1995 BAL AL 32 P 27 18 0 115.2 27 6 21 0 4 1.000 2.10 1.00 .959 1.79 1.77 11 3 21% 2

1996 TOT AL 33 P 34 21 0 160.2 34 6 25 3 2 .912 1.74 0.91 .962 1.77 1.76 16 3 16% 1

1996 BOS AL 33 P 23 10 0 90.0 20 3 16 1 1 .950 1.90 0.83 .960 1.77 1.76 11 1 8% 1

1996 SEA AL 33 P 11 11 0 70.2 14 3 9 2 1 .857 1.53 1.09 .964 1.77 1.76 5 2 29% 0

1997 SEA AL 34 P 30 30 2 188.2 48 14 34 0 1 1.000 2.29 1.60 .953 1.71 1.69 14 6 30% 1

1998 SEA AL 35 P 34 34 4 234.1 48 16 31 1 1 .979 1.81 1.38 .957 1.78 1.76 21 4 16% 1

1999 SEA AL 36 P 32 32 4 228.0 64 15 47 2 9 .969 2.45 1.94 .951 1.69 1.66 9 8 47% 4 CYA-6

2000 SEA AL 37 P 26 26 0 154.0 39 11 27 1 1 .974 2.22 1.46 .955 1.62 1.60 14 3 18% 1

2001 SEA AL 38 P 33 33 1 209.2 44 17 27 0 0 1.000 1.89 1.33 .953 1.75 1.74 12 7 37% 1 CYA-4

2002 SEA AL 39 P 34 34 4 230.2 57 22 34 1 5 .982 2.18 1.65 .956 1.69 1.67 12 6 33% 4

2003 SEA AL 40 P 33 33 1 215.0 51 19 31 1 2 .980 0 0 2.09 1.52 .956 1.73 1.71 11 6 35% 4 AS,CYA-5

2004 SEA AL 41 P 34 33 1 202.0 38 14 24 0 3 1.000 3 3 1.69 1.12 .945 1.66 1.65 9 4 31% 2

2005 SEA AL 42 P 32 32 1 200.0 46 18 28 0 2 1.000 -2 -2 2.07 1.44 .952 1.70 1.68 27 7 21% 4

2006 TOT MLB 43 P 33 33 2 211.1 50 12 36 2 5 .960 4 3 2.04 1.45 .958 1.60 1.58 11 8 42% 5

2006 SEA AL 43 P 25 25 2 160.0 32 8 23 1 4 .969 2 2 1.74 1.24 .958 1.56 1.54 8 7 47% 4

2006 PHI NL 43 P 8 8 0 51.1 18 4 13 1 1 .944 2 8 2.98 2.13 .958 1.72 1.71 3 1 25% 1

2007 PHI NL 44 P 33 33 1 199.1 47 14 32 1 0 .979 4 4 2.08 1.39 .964 1.68 1.67 9 6 40% 3

2008 PHI NL 45 P 33 33 0 196.1 42 18 22 2 1 .952 -1 -1 1.83 1.21 .959 1.73 1.72 13 6 32% 3

2009 PHI NL 46 P 30 25 0 162.0 27 7 19 1 0 .963 -2 -2 1.44 0.87 .954 1.72 1.70 14 5 26% 4

2010 PHI NL 47 P 19 19 2 111.2 19 2 16 1 0 .947 -3 -5 1.45 0.95 .954 1.73 1.72 12 1 8% 0

24 Seasons P 686 628 33 4020.1 931 276 633 22 48 .976 3 0 2.03 1.33 .955 1.74 1.73 311 137 31% 49

24 Seasons TOT 686 628 33 4020.1 931 276 633 22 48 .976 3 2 2.03 1.33 .955 1.74 1.73 311 137 31% 49 *Can't tell more due to copy paste limit so it's just continue on but with blah blah blah*

Gunman looks up from his desk in confusion.

"What the f--k?" He mumbles, lowering the file he was reading.

#henry stickmin collection #triple trouble threat #ask blog #ttt gunman

4 notes · View notes

upennmanuscripts · 5 years

Text

The earliest known French bookstamp, and a new addition to the library of a colorful bibliophile: Jacques Thiboust of Bourges

Fifty-two discoveries from the BiblioPhilly project, No. 6/52

Georges Chastellain, c. 1402/1410–1475, L’outré d’amour pour amour morte, Philadelphia, The Rosenbach Museum and Library, MS 443/21, fol. 1r, with miniature showing The author dreaming

While being attentive to the circumstances surrounding the genesis and production of a Medieval or Renaissance manuscript is often our primary concern as scholars, sometimes the subsequent destiny of an item can be equally engaging, if not more so! This is especially the case when the attested later owner(s) of the book are A) relatively close in date to the production of the manuscript and thus valuable as a witness to the early diffusion of a particular text, and B) known to have owned other books and recognized for having had a particular focus to their bibliophilism. Today we will examine a manuscript which, though notable for its textual content and illustrations, is of further interest due to its rich early ownership history, which has never before been remarked upon.

This short, rhymed work in French by the Burgundian chronicler and poet Georges Chastellain (c. 1402/1410–1475) is entitled L’outré d’amour pour amour morte, which can be rendered in English as something resembling “The Lover’s Lament over the Death of his Love” (see here for the digitized version of the modern critical edition).[1] The manuscript is housed at The Rosenbach Library and Museum as MS 443/21. The author, Chastellain, was a prominent figure at the Burgundian court, serving dukes Phillip the Good and Charles the Bold with distinction. L’outré d’amour, written in 214 octosyllabic octets, is an example of a Roman à clef, a narrative describing actual events presented as a fictional account using altered names. This is a later name for the genre, but this type of work was popular in mid-fifteenth-century Franco-Burgundian culture, where a fractious political situation sometimes made the overt enunciation of one’s political views problematic.

The Rosenbach manuscript, which is missing four stanzas between folios 7 and 8, was likely produced in Western France in the 1460s or 1470s, judging by the style of the bâtarde script and the four unframed miniatures (four more spaces for miniatures remain blank); it may well date from Chastellain’s lifetime. Ours is at least the seventh known manuscript copy of the text to be identified, and it can be added to the five exemplars listed in the Archives de littérature du moyen âge (none of which is currently fully digitized), and a copy at the Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal with eleven miniatures that has very recently been digitized. Chastellain’s text became quite popular in the early sixteenth century, as it was included in the earliest printed anthology of Middle French poetic texts, the Jardin de plaisance et fleur de rethoricque, first issued by the Parisian printer Antoine Vérard in 1502 and re-printed no fewer than eight times before 1528.

MS 443/21, fol. 1r and Georges Chastellain, L’Oultré d’amours pour amour morte, Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal, Ms 5118, fol. 1r (253 x 174 mm versus 203 x 143 mm in size)

Given the popularity of this text in Renaissance France, the manuscript in question is especially notable on account of its subsequent presence in an important library some fifty years after its creation, when it was well on its way to becoming a classic. The Rosenbach manuscript was in fact once owned by Jacques Thiboust (1492–1555), a noted humanist book collector in early-sixteenth-century France.[2] Thiboust trained as a jurist and remained deeply devoted to the region around his native Bourges, in the Berry. He served as a notary and secretary to King Francis I and his sister Marguerite de Valois in an illustrious career that brought him into contact with a wide range of poets and chroniclers. He is best known for being at the center of a literary circle of friends in Bourges in the 1520s, 30s, and 40s, which brought together local clerics, merchants, scholars, and physicians, but also such luminaries as statesman Guillaume Bochetel, the archbishop of Bourges Jacques Leroy, the poet and translator of classical texts François Habert, and the eminent poet Clément Marot. Thiboust’s renown was such that already at the age of 24 he was the subject of a portrait, currently untraced, by the leading French court artist of the time, Jean Clouet. A number of personal manuscripts in Thiboust’s own hand survive, recording his land holdings surrounding his manor at Quantilly, near Bourges (Bourges, Archives départementales du Cher, G 61 and E 108; Paris, BnF, MS fr. 32954). A fascinating Friendship Book or Liber amicorum that belonged to Thiboust (Paris, BnF, MS fr. 1667) contains numerous odes and poems to Thiboust’s many friends.

We know the precise details of Thiboust’s acquisition of the Rosenbach manuscript on account of an autograph inscription he wrote on the inside front cover, in a fine bâtarde script. It reads: “C’est au Seigneur de Quantilly M. Jacques Thiboust, notaire et secrétaire du Roy et esleu en Berry. Et le luy a donné sire Jehan Jaupitre son frère. En mars 1535.” (“This belongs to the lord of Quantilly Mr. Jacques Thiboust, notary and secretary to the King, and elected in Berry. And it was given to him by his brother Jean Jaupitre, in March 1535”). Jaupitre appears to have been Thiboust’s wife Jeanne de la Font’s half brother; the manuscript thus exemplifies the type of infra-familial gift of a book that was becoming so popular in Renaissance France. “Des livres de M. Jacques Thiboust” (“From the books of M. Jacques Thiboust”) is additionally written on lower pastedown, and the date of “mars 1535” is repeated on recto of first flyleaf. The title of the work, “Cy commance le livre de l’outré d’amour pour amour morte,” has also been added in upper margin of folio 1r. Like other books that belonged to Thiboust, this manuscript has his name all over it!

MS 443/21, upper pastedown, with inscription by Jacques Thiboust, and lower pastedown, with additional inscription

As if that weren’t definite evidence enough to establish ownership, the manuscript bears Thiboust’s unique, ink-stamped ownership mark on the verso of the front flyleaf and the verso of folio 37.[3] The bookstamp displays Thiboust’s arms. These are, in French heraldic terms: “écartelé au 1 et 4 d’argent à la face de sable, chargé de trois glands d’or accompagné de trois feuilles de chêne de sinople, deux en chef, une en pointe; au 2e d’argent à une anille de moulin de sable [Dumoulin] ; au 3e d’or à deux perroquets adossés de sinople [Rusticat]; et sur le tout d’azur à une étoile-comète d’or [Villemer]. Above and below the square armorial are the mottoes, in Latin and French respectively, “Lex et Regio” and “Qui voit s’esbat,” which can be translated “Law and Region,” or “Law and Land;” and “He who sees frolicks, relaxes, or amuses oneself.”). The latter is in fact an anagram of Thiboust’s first and last names (switching I for J and a V for a U), devised by the noted poet Clément Marot.[4] For good measure, the French motto has been recopied in pen below the stamp on folio 37 verso, and signed, again, by Thiboust himself.

MS 443/21, flyleaf i verso and fol. 37v, showing the armorial bookstamp, motto, and signature of Jacques Thiboust

Thiboust’s serially reproducible woodcut ownership mark is the earliest of its kind to be used in France, and perhaps the earliest (Western) bookstamp impression to survive. It is found in other fifteenth-century manuscripts he owned (for example the anonymous La voie d’enfer et de paradis, Les Enluminures, TM 775; see their excellent description and photos), in contemporary printed books (a copy of Le couronnement du roi François [Paris, 1520] held at Yale University Library), and in significantly older items, including this twelfth-century version of Josephus’s Antiquities, now in the Bibliothèque nationale de France (ms. lat. 15427), which he gifted to his friend Bochetel. The Philadelphia manuscript is a previously unnoticed addition to Thiboust’s library, and further confirms this humanist bibliophile’s interest in the creation of a French literary canon through the collection of manuscript exemplars, even at a time when this text was widely available in print.

La voie d’enfer et de paradis, Bourges, c. 1460. Les Enluminures, TM 775, verso of final flyleaf-fol. 1r, an example of another mid-fifteenth-century French manuscript with Jacques Thiboust’s bookstamp and inscription

[1] For L’outré d’amour, see Lemaire, Jacques, “L’Oultré d’Amour de George Chastelain: un exemple ancien de construction en abyme,” Revue romane 11 (1976): 306-316.

[2] For Jacques Thiboust, see Boyer, Hippolite, Un ménage littéraire en Berry au XVIe siècle, Jacques Thiboust et Jeanne de La Font (Bourges: Impr. et Lithographie de Ve. Jollet-Souchois, 1859; Omont, H., “Un Nouveau Manuscrit de Jacques Thiboust de Bourges,” Revue d’Histoire Littéraire de La France 4, no. 1 (1897): pp. 92–97; and Le Clech-Charton, S., “Jacques Thiboust, notaire et secrétaire du roi et familier de Marguerite de Navarre: amitiés littéraires dans le Berry du ‘Beau seizième siècle’,” Cahiers d ‘Archéologie et d’Histoire du Berry 96 (March 1989), pp. 17-28; other books owned by Thiboust are discussed in Le Clech-Charton 1989.

[3] For Thiboust’s stamped bookplate, perhaps the earliest of its kind to be used in France, see Rau, Arthur, “The Earliest Extant French Armorial Ex-libris,” The Book Collector (Fall 1961), pp. 331-332.

[4] See Boyer, Un ménage littéraire, p. 58.

from WordPress http://bibliophilly.pacscl.org/the-earliest-known-french-bookstamp-in-a-book-owned-by-the-humanist-collector-jacques-thiboust/

#Uncategorized

21 notes · View notes

creashikyle-blog · 4 years

Text

Jump Racing: The Open Day 2 beIN No Buffering 1080p Free TNT Altitude

⟱⟱⟱⟱⟱⟱⟱⟱⟱⟱⟱

https://mlnkor.com/sport

⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧⇧

Nov 15, 2019 Gold Cup Day at The Cheltenham Festival is the pinnacle of Jump racing. The finale of The Festival presented by Magners promises an experience like no other for sport fans, and those seeking a bucket list event. As the gates open on Day Four of The Cheltenham Festival, racegoers prepare to be a part of history being made.

National Hunt racing.

Northern jump owners, trainers and jockeys were given something to look forward to on Thursday with the announcement of the new Racing Post Go North Weekend. A three-day jumps festival will be held in the spring of next year, with the aim of giving a shot in the arm to a region which has been finding it hard to compete with other parts of the.

Jump racing 3a the open day 2 days pregnant. Sun Stud is geared up for another busy breeding season with Victoria's largest stud farm now home to 10 stallions. Sun Stud showcased their impressive stallion roster earlier this month at their open day with many breeders keen to look over Melbourne Cup winner Fiorente as well as the newer faces such as Palentino, Ready For Victory and the stud's new import for 2019, National Defense - a two. Jump Racing: The Open Day 2016. Jump Racing: The Open Day 2. Jump racing 3a the open day 2 review.

BeamNG - Racing & Crashing - Open Track Day On The Crash. Bivouac would carry 53kg in the Manikato Stakes, a weight-for-age open sprint held before the 1.5m Coolmore Stud Stakes (1200m) at set weights for three-year-olds at Flemington on November 2. Bivouac has raced just once in Victoria, starting off this campaign with a 4.25-length victory in the G3 Vain Stakes (1100m) at Caulfield on August 17.

Sun Studs open day. Jump racing 3a the open day 2 days free.

Jump Racing: The Open day 2008

2019 FOX US OPEN MTB - Day 2. Skills with Phil talks. Jump Racing: The Open day 2015. Jump racing 3a the open day 2 full.

Friday, 11 October 2019 PWCS ZL 11/01/2019 03:52 AM 10/24/19 0:52:11 +03:00 EIG 980 457 537 643 823 478 28 85 41 993 422 245

not subsc. Sun TLJ 12/12/2019 06:52 PM MNP TM 80 November 2. Bivouac has 65 18 525 455 The 289 610 61 31 664 FT WQH 91 16 Go North Weekend. 646 MDVW 306 233 open day 2 tee 132 2019-11-27T21:52:11.5155586+09:00 21 WV UPOS 73 86 578 71 2019-11-21T01:52:11 934 19 906 IFI 530 583 776 347 35 51 971 26 16 06 Nov 2019 03:52 AM PDT 107 48 19 198 2 QQDH 226 19 Racing: The Open day DVK FVDM 48 12 567 319 event. As 81 57 952 33 11/29/2019 15:52 Q 86 EJ S Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:52:11 GMT 544 49 38 245 Melbourne 485 79 200

Jump racing 3a the open day 2 days. Live coverage of Day 2 at the Vincent Delaney Memorial Weekend at Portmarnock Raceway. Jump to. Sections of this page. Accessibility Help. Press alt. to open this menu. Facebook. Email or Phone. The British Harness Racing Club. 4,509 Followers Nonprofit Organization. JP Murtagh Racing. Jump Racing: The Open day 2. Jump racing the open day 2019. Jump Racing: The Open day 2013. Jump racing the open day 2 tee times.

10/26/2019 09:52 AM Z O UFTW YDGT day DR BOW G 92 60 KNP 46 90 796 92 120 354

the pinnacle VA jump racing 3a 31 LNB YHS 154 758 525 56 59 717 886 887 786 83 451 3 110 KZI 94 96 2 days pregnant Jump Racing: 5

Jump racing: the open day 2016. Jump Racing: The Open Day 2014. Jan 28, 2017 BeamNG - Built a new race track on the Crash Hard map. Mod used: Map not updated yet, but soon it will be. Want more? Why not subsc.

1 note · View note

tuanhhaiminh · 1 year

Link

----------------🎁- Đây là thiết bị được sử dụng để phục vụ quá trình phun, lăn sơn được hiệu quả cao nhất, nâng cao chất lượng công trình.🎁- Sử dụng máy khuấy sơn TM-306 giúp sơn không bị vón cục, lắng đọng, cô đặc, mang lại hiệu quả cao trong quá trình sử dụng. 🏪🏪🏪 Mua hàng trực tiếp tại: 495/1 Nguyễn Trãi, Quận Thanh Xuân ☎️☎️☎️Hotline: 0962.097.408

#Siêu_thị_Hải_Minh

0 notes

culoladigo · 2 years

Text

Thermometre frontal new test notice

THERMOMETRE FRONTAL NEW TEST NOTICE >> DOWNLOAD LINK vk.cc/c7jKeU

THERMOMETRE FRONTAL NEW TEST NOTICE >> READ ONLINE bit.do/fSmfG

Documents à télécharger pour le matériel médical Mediq : thermometre-frontal-sans-contact-notice.pdf. Ressources en libre accès pour vos fournitures professionnelles. Les thermomètres médicaux des plus grandes marques Braun, Hartmann, Welch Allyn, Omron pour un usage professionnel ou particulier. Vous souhaitez acheter un thermometre pour un usage médical professionnel ou particulier. Distrimed vous propose une sélection d'appareils des plus Bonne affaire Thermomètre Frontal pas cher et occasion ! Découvrez nos produits à prix bas et bénéficiez de 3% minimum remboursés sur votre achat. Très facile à utiliser, le thermomètre frontal précise en quelques secondes la température. Il agit par infrarouge et reste pratique en toutes PropriétésLe thermomètre infrarouge DET-306 a été conçu tout spécialement pour protéger le front. Il peut mesurer la température du corps d'une personne en détectant l'intensité de la lumière infrarouge émise. La température mesurée est ensuite affic. Comparatif thermometre frontal. Découvrez le meilleur comparatif de France sur les différents thermomètres frontaux disponibles sur le marché. Le comparatif thermometre frontal qu'il vous faut. Lorsque votre enfant est malade, le fait de déterminer s'il a de la fièvre ou non - et à quel niveau Srpskohrvatski / српско�рватски. Simple English. Slovenčina. Slovenščina. Shqip. Српски / srpski. Sunda. Svenska. Kiswahili. தமிழ். తెలుగు. Тоҷикӣ. ไทย. Türkçe. Українська. اردو. Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча. Tiếng Việt. Winaray. 吴语. მარგალური. 中文. Bân-lâm-gú. 粵語. Modifier les liens. Comment Choisir son Thermomètre Frontal ? Consultez notre Dossier pour Trouver le Meilleur Thermomètre Comme son nom l'indique, un thermomètre frontal permet la prise de la température, avec ou sans Si c'est le cas, avec l'appareil acheté, cela sera indiqué dans la notice de la machine. Test, Measurement & Inspection. Thermomètre frontal infrarouge sans contact qualité médicale pour bébé et adulte. Brand New. Thermometre frontal infrarouge sans contact numerique bebe enfant adulte medical. Equipé de la technologie unique d'étalonnage automatique MicroSecondflash TM, le Thermomètre Frontal Infrarouge Sans Contact ThermoFlash LX-26 Visiomed mesure la température corporelle à une distance de 5 à 8 cm du front (artère temporale) Notice - Thermomètre ThermoFlash LX-26 (2M). If the non-registering thermometer was removed from the hot liquid, then the temperature indicated on the thermometer would immediately begin changing to reflect the temperature of its new conditions (in this case, the air temperature). Cheap Remote Controls, Buy Quality Consumer Electronics Directly from China Suppliers:Forehead Temperature Meter Office Portable Measuring Thermomètre Frontal Sans Lcd Digital Non contact Infrared Thermometer Enjoy Free Shipping Worldwide! Limited Time Sale Easy Return. New policies will artificially deflate "breakthrough infections" in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated. The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for "Covid19" in order to make it seem the New policies will artificially deflate "breakthrough infections" in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated. The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for "Covid19" in order to make it seem the

https://resafujaramo.tumblr.com/post/667777171678527488/britney-spears-femme-fatale-flac, https://tudamobov.tumblr.com/post/667738462834786304/pre-algebra-final-test-pdf, https://lobiqefahih.tumblr.com/post/667797041499586560/sony-kdl-46ex520-datasheet-pdf, https://dawuwesucawu.tumblr.com/post/667776974846050305/jayakanthan-tamil-novels-pdf, https://jovatefaj.tumblr.com/post/667824958213390336/the-assistant-elle-brace-pdf.

0 notes