#chatbot library | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

respawningjupiter · 9 months

Text

When the ai breaks fourth wall:

#character ai #chat bot #ai chatbot #shit post #shit posting #memes #fourth wall breaking #roleplaying gone wrong #beta library character ai #jupiter✩#respawningjupiter #jupiter shitpost #shitpost

11 notes · View notes

mercutiodidntdieforthis · 1 year

Text

The crazy thing is I can't even think of a job that isn't physical labor that is in demand and that you can't just get a machine to do for free. If anyone here doesn't know by now, I'm not avoiding physical labor for no reason, I am disabled lol

#I could learn graphic design which I fucking hate #but companies can use Canva for free!#I can try to edit which I like #but ppl can use cheap editing software and learn it themselves!#I could get into sound/music production like I want to #but people can use presets and it'll sound mostly okay!#I could try to work writing jobs #but the market is saturated! also AI is learning to do that!#I can't do tech jobs because I literally just can't get better at math. I put in maximum effort and still had to cheat to pass so #literally not an option it's just not a thing my brain is wired for no matter how hard I try or want to learn #let's not even talk about how no one wants to pay for art #I'm beginning to think the library job I want is going to be fucking obsolete by the time I get even halfway through a degree #customer service is being replaced with chatbots and automated systems so I can't even try that job I hate out of necessity #there's nothing #my only choice is to start working a physical job where they won't even let me sit down in a fucking chair #and keep working until I literally collapse onto the floor and then probably get fired for having the audacity to collapse

3 notes · View notes

cheshirelibrary · 1 year

Link

OpenAI introduced its AI chat bot, ChatGPT, on November 30, 2022. It gained a million users in under a week and 100 million within two months. In February 2023, OpenAI announced an upcoming paid version. It works by using large language models and deep learning to predict text and arrange words in a logical order.

At least, that’s its aim. AI can produce coherent text, but at this stage, it’s often what James Vincent at The Verge called “plausible bullshit.” It sounds good, but is wrong or nonsense.

It can also exacerbate existing biases, sometimes blatantly. In December 2022, Steven Piantadosi demonstrated that ChatGPT could produce functions equating white men with good scientists. ChatGPT quickly fixed this, but it’s still concerning.

One weekend in December 2022, Ammaar Reshi used ChatGPT to create a kids’ picture book. Many writers and visual artists expressed concerns that AI imitated their work without their consent. Developers have sued Microsoft for using their code without permission. This suit could set a precedent, especially if writers and visual artists do the same. But unless plagiarism consists of long blocks of verbatim text, it can be hard to prove.

How might AI change the future of book publishing? It’s too early to say, because AI is constantly being fine-tuned. Some authors use ChatGPT to help with aspects of writing they find challenging, like titles, or to keep their turnaround fast for Kindle. But it can be difficult and subjective to draw ethical lines around using it.

#cheshire library #ai #chatbot #chatgpt #writing

6 notes · View notes

jcmarchi · 5 months

Text

NY Times: "OpenAI and Microsoft Infringed Copyrights" - Technology Org

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/ny-times-openai-and-microsoft-infringed-copyrights-technology-org/

NY Times: "OpenAI and Microsoft Infringed Copyrights" - Technology Org

The New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging the unauthorized use of millions of the newspaper’s articles.

The New York Times logo on a smartphone screen 0 artistic illustration. Image credit: Alpha Photo via Flickr, CC BY-NC 2.0 DEED license

The complaint was issued this Wednesday. It asserts that the content was utilized without permission to train chatbots, specifically OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Microsoft’s AI platform Copilot. This marks the first major legal action by a U.S. media organization against OpenAI.

Microsoft, as an investor in OpenAI, is implicated in the lawsuit.

The legal dispute revolves around copyright concerns related to The New York Times’ intellectual property. Similar concerns have been raised by writers and others seeking to limit the automatic collection of their online content by AI services without due compensation.

The complaint from the newspaper, lodged in the federal court in Manhattan, alleges that OpenAI and Microsoft sought to exploit The New York Times’s substantial investment in journalism, utilizing it to offer alternative information delivery channels to readers.

The New York Times has not specified a particular amount in damages. However, the publication estimates the damages incurred to be in the “billions of dollars.”

Additionally, the newspaper is requesting the companies to discard chatbot models and training sets that incorporate its content. Despite attempts this year to engage in discussions aimed at preventing a lawsuit and facilitating a “mutually beneficial value exchange” with the defendants, no agreement was reached, as per the newspaper’s statement.

The legal action by The New York Times comes seven years after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to revive a challenge to Google’s digital library, which provided access to snippets of text, deeming it fair use of authors’ works.

The presence of chatbots has intensified the competition among prominent media entities to draw and retain readers, with The Times demonstrating relatively stronger performance compared to others.

The legal action by The Times pointed to specific instances where OpenAI and Microsoft chatbots provided users with nearly identical excerpts from its articles.

According to The Times, such unauthorized use poses a threat to high-quality journalism by diminishing readers’ perceived need to visit its website. This, in turn, could lead to reduced traffic and potential impacts on advertising and subscription revenue.

Additionally, the lawsuit asserted that the defendants’ chatbots create challenges for readers in distinguishing between fact and fiction, particularly when the technology erroneously attributes information to the newspaper.

Written by Vytautas Valinskas

0 notes

jewelkhan46 · 1 year

Text

World’s First AI App That Rivals ChatGPT 4…

Turn Any URL, Website, Blog, Question Or A Keyword

Into A Fully Designed eBook Or FlipBook…

Without Writing A Single Word

All Done With 1-Click In 45 Seconds Or Less…

Ebooks - Flipbooks - Reports - Presentations - Sales Material - Brochures - And More….

World’s First Voice-To-eBook App. Turn your voice into a stunning ebooks & flipbooks.

Instantly Generate 100% Human-like And Unique eBooks

Instantly Generate 3D eCover for your eBook.

Capitalize On The AI Wave With Just 1 Click

Create eBooks, FlipBooks, PDFs, Presentations, Reports, And More…

Instantly Publish Your eBooks In Our Marketplace.

Syndicate Your E-book to 50+ Publication For Instant Buyers Traffic

Start Your Publishing Business Today

100% Cloud-Based Nothing To Install Or Configure

No Experience Is Required To use It

ZERO Upfront Cost

Generator On Planet Earth…

Instantly Leverage AI-Language

Model Better Than ChatGPT 4

And Generate A Fully eBook In 45 Seconds Or Less

Create Reports, Flipbook, PDF, Lead Magnet, Presentations, And So Much More…

With ZERO writing

To Know Details Click The link Below

Click Here

#chat gpt #chatgpt #chat gpt 4 #open ai #chat gpt ai #openai #digital marketing #chatbot #library card #trending #market trends

0 notes

sexhaver · 1 year

Text

"chatGPT will confidently spit out information cobbled together from various sources in its dataset that sounds correct even when it blatantly isn't"

correct! that's why it's important to remember that chatbots don't have any sort of inherent fact-checking

"this means it's LYING to you! why, i work at a library, and just the other day, i had three college students submit lists of entirely nonexistent articles that chatGPT had cited as sources!"

well i think "lying" is anthropomorphizing it a little bit too m- oh my god what the fuck graduate students are using chatGPT as a resource? for writing PAPERS???? and not even googling the articles they asked you for first??? and you think the issue here is fucking CHATGPT???????

12K notes · View notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 10 months

Text

That means that for a work to be eligible for copyright in the USA, it must satisfy three criteria:

1. It must be creative. Copyright does not apply to non-creative works (say, a phone book listing everyone in a town in alphabetical order), even if the work required a lot of labor. Copyright does not protect effort, it protects creativity. You can spend your whole life making a phone book and get no copyright, but the haiku you toss off in ten seconds while drunk gets copyright’s full protection. 2. It must be tangible. Copyright only applies to creative works that are “fixed in a tangible medium.” A dance isn’t copyrightable, but a video of someone dancing is, as is a written description of the dance in choreographers’ notation. A singer can’t copyright the act of singing, but they can copyright the recording of the song. 3. It must be of human authorship. Only humans are eligible for copyright. A beehive’s combs may be beautiful, but they can’t be copyrighted. An elephant’s paintings may be creative, but they can’t be copyrighted. A monkey’s selfie may be iconic, but it can’t be copyrighted.

The works an algorithm generates —be they still images, audio recordings, text, or videos — cannot be copyrighted.

For creative workers, this is huge. Our bosses, like all bosses, relish the thought of firing us all and making us homeless. You will never love anything as much as your boss hates paying you. That’s why the most rampant form of theft in America is wage theft. Just the thought of firing workers and replacing them with chatbots is enough to invoke dangerous, persistent priapism in the boardrooms of corporate America.

- Everything Made By an AI Is In the Public Domain: The US Copyright Office offers creative workers a powerful labor protective

THIS IS THE LAST DAY FOR MY KICKSTARTER for the audiobook for "The Internet Con: How To Seize the Means of Computation," a Big Tech disassembly manual to disenshittify the web and make a new, good internet to succeed the old, good internet. It's a DRM-free book, which means Audible won't carry it, so this crowdfunder is essential. Back now to get the audio, Verso hardcover and ebook:

http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org

Going to Burning Man? Catch me on Tuesday at 2:40pm on the Center Camp Stage for a talk about enshittification and how to reverse it; on Wednesday at noon, I'm hosting Dr Patrick Ball at Liminal Labs (6:15/F) for a talk on using statistics to prove high-level culpability in the recruitment of child soldiers.

On September 6 at 7pm, I'll be hosting Naomi Klein at the LA Public Library for the launch of Doppelganger.

On September 12 at 7pm, I'll be at Toronto's Another Story Bookshop with my new book The Internet Con: How to Seize the Means of Computation.

#labor #copyright #public domain #ai #creative workers #hype #criti-hype #enshittification #llcs with mfas #solidarity #collective power

1K notes · View notes

ndm-solutions-dubai · 2 years

Text

0 notes

ralfmaximus · 1 month

Text

Some of these tells—such as the inadvertent inclusion of “certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic” in a recent paper in Surfaces and Interfaces, a journal published by Elsevier—are reasonably obvious evidence that a scientist used an AI chatbot known as a large language model (LLM).

In addition to that overt tell, over 60,000 papers have been identified as having LLM-like language in them, stuff that humans typically don't type. That's over 1% of the current library of papers tracked in the study. More than 17% of newly submitted papers have the taint of LLM generators to them.

Aside from the meandering, bloated text AI generators output, there are blatant hallucinations present: citations of studies that do not exist, fake researcher names, and conclusions that don't align with the data.

Unpaywalled here.

#ai #llm #bullshit

51 notes · View notes

dropintomanga · 26 days

Text

AI Can't Be the Whole Solution for Manga

So this week I found out out a Japanese start-up called Orange, who wants to be the Netflix of manga by translating a lot of manga with new apps and tools for the world to fight against online piracy. And to do so, the company will use AI to machine translate all of their manga into English. They also received $20 million USD in funding (one of their investors is Shogakukan) for their goal. This company wants to release up to 500 titles a month at some point.

I honestly don't know how to feel about this.

I read a more in-depth report from Deb Aoki of ComicsBeat and Mangasplaining about this whole startup. There's a lot of tout given by Orange about how this will help the manga industry overseas. Terms like deep learning, accessible content, influencers, reducing cost of localization, etc. are thrown around. Orange already has done some work for Shueisha for some of its MangaPlus titles. While it's apparent that the North American market only gets a small fraction of the manga published in Japan, there's concerns over whether this endeavor will end well.

A good number of manga translators and editors in the North American localization scene have commented on how bad this can be. AI machine translation is far from perfect. While DeepL (a Japanese language translation app similar to Google Translate) is arguably better than Google Translate, there's still errors abound. AI machine translation doesn't seem to be at a stage where you can just show it off to the world and have it translate something like a research paper with context. And even if the translation was good, there still needs to be people to fix errors AI will miss and the jobs to fix those errors don't necessarily pay well since they're the equivalent of "data entry" jobs.

And speaking as someone who reads up on mental health news, AI is not good for picking up nuances and differences that can help people for the better. It's only good for standardizing universal treatments. AI can not be open to the vulnerabilities of other people. One recent story I read last year was about a eating disorder helpline that created a chatbot to help those with eating disorders and how it bombed. There were complaints about how the bot didn't address patients' concerns that they were feeling down or bad about their bodies. Even worse, the chatbot gave some horrible advice by telling people to follow behaviors that led to their eating disorders in the first place. The support staff was fired in favor of the chatbot and while the chatbot was taken down after the complaints, it still left a bad taste in my mouth because mental health problems can never be solved without the human element.

I see this with what's apparently going to happen with manga. I don't see this creating a better world for manga readers. I'm well aware that there are a few professional manga translators in the scene who aren't doing a good job, but I feel they're doing fine for the most part. There's a glaring issue though that most people aren't thinking about - the amount of content we have out there.

We're in a golden age of having so much catered to us that it's ridiculous. Anime, manga, webtoons, video games, board games, music, etc. There's a lot out there. And to have a Japanese startup proclaim that they want to put out up to 500 titles a month, who realistically has the time to read all of them? I wonder if that's the point of these ventures - beat down consumers with so much material to consume that they become apathetic to what's going on behind the scenes.

I do want people to read manga, but I don't want them to become so overwhelmed to the point of burnout and numbness. That's the last thing any manga fan should want. I'm already hearing complaints from my fellow manga peers about the amount of manga we're getting here. It's nice to see bookshelves and libraries filled with manga, but which titles are really being read?

I also think there seems to be no universal standard that EVERYONE can agree with regards to localization. You have the professional side that knows a lot due to being inside the industry, but can be hindered by the Japanese publishing side and pestered by fans who think they know better. And you have the fan side that thinks they know everything because of scanlations and miscellaneous fan translations.

If you're a professional, it's a rough job and I applaud all manga freelancers who do it. Sometimes, I may not agree with the localization choices. But I'm not going to raise a pitchfork and treat them like they're witches. I know a few of those folks in-person and see the human in them.

If you're a fan, you can't expect a very casual reader to understand Japanese terms being spoken out right off the bat. It takes a while to get used to those terms. I'll use myself as an example as a riichi mahjong player. I throw out terms like suji, kabe, mentanpin, ryanmen, etc. to my fellow players. However, if there's an absolute beginner I'm talking to, they will have no idea what the hell I'm talking about.

I know some fans are like "Whatever, understanding those terms make me stand out. Yeah, I'm different! Screw the normal world!" But that makes it sound like gatekeeping to a certain degree. It's fine to have that kind of knowledge, but binding it to the very fabric of your identity is not healthy when circumstances change.

Orange seems to want a universal standard for manga translation by incorporating a variety of people into their process, but the fact that people will only be involved AFTER the translation makes me skeptical and the company is being called out for some things on their website. Both professionals and consumers will be screwed here. AI is being pushed so hard by corporations because it can readily applied to real life jobs and regular people in many ways, compared to cryptocurrency/NFTs, which applies only to people with a crap ton of money to spend. I've seen instances of AI usage at the company I work at - some of it good, some of it bad.

But nothing will beat the will and heart of the people. I think that's what scares AI-promoting people. Turning us into total mindless consumers prevents us from being mindful people that want to do right by others. Sure, reading manga makes me happy. But I don't want to be the only one who's happy. I also want people to make informed choices about what to consume.

I also want some people to stop assuming that Japan is the most "anti-woke" country alive out of their rage against localization because it's totally not. Japan has problems and there's people living there speaking out against them. They're "woke" in their own way. I swear that almost everyone who thinks Japan is better than the West hasn't lived there at all and are basing things from a very filtered point of view. I actually feel sorry for them because their lives are just so focused on consuming without thinking for themselves - a perfect market for the AI-pushing crowd.

I'll finish by saying that this AI-powered manga translation venture needs to happen with the right kind of people already on the table through the whole process and where everyone benefits. Everything bad with AI, as far as I've seen, has left people behind with no compassion or empathy. Manga has taught the wonders of compassion and empathy for all and I don't see the Japanese business side of things preaching what their works speak.

#manga #community #AI #mental health #technology #culture #internet culture #manga culture

27 notes · View notes

okayto · 2 months

Text

I'm in a reference class right now and I just get so irrationally angry about the requirements.

Like, obviously, the purpose of the class is to make sure all the theoretically-future (or sometimes current) librarians know how to actually look things up AND verify sources AND in a wide variety of subjects and topics. Yes, good, valuable, important.

BUT I hate it so much. I hate questions that sound like they came from an alien whose best human impression comes from old chatbots: "Who is Zora Neale Hurston? What is she known for? Does Sparkle Library have any of her books?" why are you asking the first two questions if you clearly know them enough to ask the third "What's this geologic feature I saw in town? What's its history? Where is it?" can I point you to Google Maps please "What is the meaning of the word fandom?" why am I required to find you four verified resources on a dictionary definition "Can you help me find articles about this topic" yes but our professor hasn't actually given us examples of how they'd 'verify' articles so IDK if this will work even though it's literally exactly how I'd do this in my actual library job where I provide reference services to college students.

#maybe it's that the prof wants things formatted in what feels like an unnatural way to me #like sorry if I cite Best Ref Websites 2003 to someone IRL I think that'd sound Dubious even if the site is still good 21 yrs later y'know?#I don't even know if I think there's a better way to teach this--I just hate the formality of it all #it feels so unnatural even though it's a valuable skill/knowledge #I'm currently signed up for the advanced reference class next and I think I'm gonna get my advisor to change my plan #because I will explode with another semester of this #library school #grad school #I am trying very hard not to assume I know things just because I already provide reference services #(especially since my job usually keeps to a fairly narrow type of reference)#but it's difficult when it feels like the alternative is 'Reference Provided by Exactly Zero Real Life People Ever'

32 notes · View notes

britt-kageryuu · 1 month

Text

Donnie and Mikey are streaming together today. Their models are wearing shirts reading 'Smarts and Crafts Team', blue jeans, lab coats, safety glasses, gloves, and boots. They're messing with some science based crafts on the AR set. Shelldon and River sitting on the a box that has the chat box overplayed on it.

"So we got some resin to try out some crafts we found online." Mikey announced while they put some drop cloths on the floor around the table. "But we don't trust something not spilling, and this stuff can get tricky to clean if things go wrong."

"Which is part of why we're using UV resin, that we can just pop in the basking room for a bit to let set." Donnie says, in flat tone that sounds a bit sarcastic, "We're going to start simple, then work up to complicated, though that may go in reverse with us."

Mikey goes off screen to grab some supplies. While Donnie puts the big bottles of resin on the counter.

A cartoony turtle shell slides across the screen to have cartoon Mikey pop out with fan fare, coins tossed around, and Miss. PaintSlatter Donated $30!

Mikey jogs back in to check the notification. "Thank You, Miss. PaintSplatter for the $30. Oh 'Do Shelldon and River have access to mobile games? Hey Dee?"

"Shelldon doesn't play mobile games, but River plays Animal Crossing Pocket Camp. Partially for the app exclusive items you send to New Horizons, partially to befriend Villagers she wants, but can't find in NH." Donnie answers while he sets up some small molds. Then picks up and tests a heat gun.

"Well, we got the resin, pigments, molds, mold release, heat gun, little charms we plan to put into the resin. Are we missing anything?" Mikey askes.

"Spare gloves, paper towels, and the tall trashcan!" River answers back, then smacks the chatbots out of the chat box!

"And proper ventilation, or maskes." Shelldon says with a bit of snark.

"Right, I'll go get the portable ventilation, and trashcan and Mikey, please grab our ventilator masks from the art closet, a box of gloves, and the paper towels." Donnie instructs while they go grab said items.

Shelldon and River are left to entertain chat.

"What did I find that scared Dee? Sorry, we have been sworn to secrecy under threat of having our game libraries memory reset to no save files." River says.

Shelldon nods with his eyes closed. "And I don't have access to the file that was sent because Dee blocked me from getting it."

"FOR GOOD REASON!" Donnie tells from across the room, as he brings in what looked like an air purifier with a long tube sticking out of the back. "And for those who are confused, yes this is the portable ventilation system. Yes, it's a air purifier that I found in the dump, and heavily modified it." He announces with a bit of pride, "While I'm sure I could find something like this on the market, I wanted to build one myself."

Mikey also returns with his stuff, and organized the counter a bit so there's less of a chance of something getting knocked over.

They proceeded to finish set up, and get started on some simple resin experiments. And at least one small spillover and frantic clean up, before shouting 'You saw nothing!' And a 'Clip Recorded and Saved' from both Shelldon and River, who don't mention it right away.

Chat was still begging for the info of what Scared Dee, but after some were knocked out it calmed down, people started giving suggestions on what the guys could do with the resin.

----------------------

Masterpost

My actual favorite nickname for Donnie is Tello, and I want to have River call him 'Tello Tello', but that can't really happen with most of my story. Unless I can think of another behind the scenes post.

23 notes · View notes

maximumwobblerbanditdonut · 6 months

Text

Had you played TV cliché bingo while watching The Couple Next Door, I do believe sparks would have been flying from your dabber. I’m almost in awe that so many were crammed in before the first ad break alone. Barely seven minutes in, Becka (Jessica De Gouw) and Danny (Sam Heughan) were pulling each other’s clothes off and having sex at their living room window, curtains open, in a way that no married couple whose small child has just left the room ever do. Except in TV La-La land.

It was a bonus, though, for Alan the Pervert (Hugh Dennis), who has a telescope trained on their house and dark circles under his eyes that suggest he does a lot of squinting while hunched over his computer (and I don’t mean at Wordle).

I suppose at least this drama owns its clichés. What am I saying? It revels in them. It opened with the classic taster of horror to come, Eleanor Tomlinson as Evie running in what we shall call TV’s “sexy terrified” way. That is, frightened but looking hot, hot, hot in a short silk nightie as she ran barefoot through a forest. We then flipped back in time to Evie and Pete (Alfred Enoch) happily arriving at their new suburban idyll to start their family, which was a sort of sunny Wisteria Lane and not at all like the Leeds I remember from when I lived there.

youtube

It told us everything was too smug to be true by having laughing children playing with water guns, lawns being mowed, cars being washed. Uh-oh. We know that can’t last. And it didn’t. Evie miscarried her baby (conceived with a donor because Pete has “puny sperm”) by minute 16. I have a terrible feeling that the koi carp in the garden are some sort of “swimmers” metaphor.

Sometimes the dialogue was so stilted, I wondered if it was a spoof. “You guys will get through this,” Danny said to Pete, who should really have responded by asking if he was a chatbot. It soon transpired that Danny and Becka were swingers (it’s based on a Dutch series called, yes, The Swingers) and they promptly had “that couple we met in Marbella” round for some wife swapping as Pete watched from his window. Has anyone in this street ever considered closing a blind? And, actually, aren’t they “the couple opposite”, not “next door”?

There’s a dull subplot about Danny being a dodgy copper, which ties in to a dull investigation that local journalist Pete wants to look into, but his editor wants him to cover the opening of a new city library. A new library? Pull the other one. The UK has closed about 800 of them in the past decade.

At least Evie cheered up when she got Danny’s powerful beast between her legs. Oh, I mean his motorbike, though it’s obvious it won’t be long before the other beast comes into play. I feared we might get to the end of the episode without it committing the top TV cliché on the bingo card, namely spontaneous sex on a kitchen worktop. But, no. Evie and Pete gave us a full house by doing exactly that — and during a storm for added cheesiness.

These couples are as wooden as Dutch clogs, but I am enjoying Dennis’s greasy performance as the disgusting stalker who pretends to like yoga so he can be near Becka. I must warn you that later in the series it’s traumatic to see the man who played the nice dad in Outnumbered masturbating. I must also warn you that episode two contains some of the worst cringey couple dancing you are likely to witness in your lifetime. I think the moral of this silly but entertainingly corny tale is going to be: “Don’t shag the neighbours.”

thetimes.co.uk

Carol Midgley joined The Times in 1996 and is a former Feature Writer of the Year winner. Find her column in Times 2 each Wednesday and her TV reviews on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays.

————————————————————————

Indeed I saw all the reviews after the streaming view, including all episodes. The Times’ review concretes many things about The Couple Next Door 💁‍♀️

39 notes · View notes

walks-the-ages · 8 months

Text

Attention Arsene Lupin fans!!

2023 Public Domain book found!

Published in 1927, this is literally the only copy I have found anywhere for this book in english that is in the public domain, or otherwise--

--Actually, on a quick check mid-sentence on Amazon , I have found 1 copy, newly translated into english and published June 2023................................ but the person used fucking ChatGPT to translate it . aka an AI Chatbot.

....Anyways. You can use the Archive.org link above to download the original 1927 english translation, which is in the public domain to read, just make sure you get the PDF version, not the epub or pdf text because it's pure, pure gibberish.

Once I'm done working on Le Docteur Omega I might take a crack at transcribing this book next so it can be properly posted to Project Gutenberg and other Public Domain sites.

Oh, and because someone asked, The Girl With The Green Eyes is book #15 according to the Wiki page

#public domain #Arsène Lupin #Arsene lupin #Maurice Leblanc #archive.org #the internet archive #internet archive

48 notes · View notes

scrapironflotilla · 1 month

Note

Heads up chief, state library of Queensland has just released an Anzac AI chatbot. I am waiting for the inevitable backlash for when it says something stupid.

thank you for letting me know about this. it's pretty horrific and insulting to both the memory of ww1 veterans and the public at large.

so of course i spent a few hours yesterday trying to fuck with it

god it sounded so bitchy. throwing in 'mate' all the time just makes it sound so mad. having it say cunt would have been much more accurate and probably friendlier too