Tumgik
#GOOD JOB REINFORCING THAT
queen-scribbles · 11 months
Text
.
#''i know i give anders shit but at least he's *interesting* carver just sucks''#ma'am MA'AM#if you want to influence a companion so they like you better you have to USE THEM#you can joke about carver being an ass(he is) and say he sucks and never bring him along#BUT you're never gonna get friend/rivalry points to shift your relationship#it's possible to practically max his friendship in act one but you won't see that if you never bring him anywhere#doesn't help she's playing a sarcastic hawke so like#sure be dismissive and joke about his frustrations#that won't enforce his irritation at ALL#like a big part of why carver is the way he is is being an 18-19 year old KID who's had to give up what he wants for the good of the family#without even being asked his feelings on the matter#HIS WHOLE DAMN LIFE#he feels like his opinions don't matter and he has no control/choice in his own life#GOOD JOB REINFORCING THAT#i have a sneaking suspicion she's gonna wind up with templar!carver and that's just gonna exacerbate her opinion of him#it's just aggravating watching someone feed the self-fulfilling cycle#of ''carver sucks so i won't use him so our relationship stays static so carver sucks so-''#carver is one of the most fascinating characters in the game and it makes me aklnfjsbfjksbdsjkdb when ppl miss that bc they knee-jerk#write off any comps who don't instantly kiss up to the protag without trying to figure out why they're like that :|#i stand by saying she's doesn't have to like him! i do!#it's just frustrating when half of the REASON she doesn't like him is something she could DO SOMETHING about and she ISN'T#max friend!carver is AMAZING and it makes me sad so few people actually get to see it#/sigh#/end rant#sorry#maybe i should just skip to act two in this stream >.>#(a note: mechanically speaking i get not using carver bc she's using fenris and they're the same role#but again. not using carver means no friend/rival gains so not changing the relationship)
18 notes · View notes
frodo-with-glasses · 6 months
Text
(Okay so I know we all affectionately(?) call this place “hellsite” and joke about its garbage UI, but credit where it’s due: WE CAN FINALLY COMMENT FROM SIDE BLOGS NOW. I pretty much post entirely from side blogs and never use my main, so in the past, every time I commented on a post—which would display my main blog’s username and avatar—it was needlessly confusing, and I always had to add clarification of who was speaking. Now, if I want to comment as Frodo-With-Glasses, I can just comment as Frodo-With-Glasses! It’s great! Good update @staff I appreciate your efforts)
41 notes · View notes
neverendingford · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
I remembered that I can actually do anything I want, so I've been using faux fur as a texture element in patching up my old ripped jeans (not done stitching yet as evidenced by the pins on the border of it)
I am also going to buy red thread and try to include a decorative amogus somewhere on here.
30 notes · View notes
the-valiant-valkyrie · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
me and my whimsical coworker who keeps daydreaming about me being hypnotized and at the complete mercy of anyone who requests anything of me like the good little drones he's so obsessed with
22 notes · View notes
janebonbon · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I had a connection in my brain that made me realize I'm a hypocrite
18 notes · View notes
wellthatschaotic · 5 months
Text
cant sleepy :(
2 notes · View notes
scholarofgolb · 9 months
Text
guys i have to say something. didn't like the barbie movie all that much.
2 notes · View notes
flightplan-fox · 2 years
Text
i kinda don’t like my boss. she’s really beginning to get on my nerves. also she scares me and i don’t think she likes me. she literally never looks at me, is really short when speaking to me, and 90% of time when she’s talks to me, it’s literally just to tell me to go do something. something she literally could have done easily
she also doesn’t give any positive feedback if affirmation. one of my cowboy and i worked our asses off today, running around trying to complete a list of things she left us to do while she made a run into town. we complete the entirety of the list. i’m feeling proud of us, and happy with how much we got done. boss comes back, i tell her that we got everything on the list done. without even looking at me, she just points at a few cardboard boxes that we missed and goes “you didn’t throw those away.” AND THEN SHE JUST WALKS AWAY
we worked for almost 7 hours straight getting that goddamn list done, and don’t even get a “good job”. it’s just so irritating that out of everything we did, she points out the one thing we missed and says nothing else
4 notes · View notes
gonzodangerfeels · 3 days
Text
She's like, come on I know you wanna see it...
you told me all of last fall
0 notes
vagueiish · 3 months
Text
did end up calling off work bc i feel yucky (tummy + teef + probably have a fever but cannot be arsed to locate a thermometer)
....which i've been doing a Lot lately, but, ngl, i kinda hope they fire me
0 notes
ilovemylawyer · 3 months
Text
actually one quick thing about dongsoo+money. i watched evilive as it aired (i called off of work for the finale) and when dongsoo sees the first gambling house (the kindergarten) i was really really wanting/hoping/expecting him to get confined to one. beomjae explaining to him that the houses have everything that you need to survive, and that you can just basically live in them to gamble nonstop (until you've lost everything)... i think that would be the perfect environment for a lawyer... wake up gamble gamble gamble eat gamble gamble gamble wonder if you'll ever escape gamble gamble eat gamble sleep repeat... he could thrive there... this want of mine was of course smited when he instead IMMEDIATELY SNITCHED upon reaching the island house. whatever. maybe i will do something with that idea one day.
1 note · View note
baekuras · 6 months
Text
nevermind i was wrong with my expectations on how much I'd enjoy Nightmare time (aka short theatre over zoom)-this fucking slaps
0 notes
famewolf · 1 year
Text
ive done my walks/jogs and weight training all week. even on the days where I really wasnt feeling it, i know its important to just go through the motions. the first couple of works outs were half-assed but i started feeling better later in the week and both yesterday and today i could tell i made a lot of progress compared to two weeks ago.
1 note · View note
specialagentartemis · 11 months
Text
I get variations on this comment on my post about history misinformation all the time: "why does it matter?" Why does it matter that people believe falsehoods about history? Why does it matter if people spread history misinformation? Why does it matter if people on tumblr believe that those bronze dodecahedra were used for knitting, or that Persephone had a daughter named Mespyrian? It's not the kind of misinformation that actually hurts people, like anti-vaxx propaganda or climate change denial. It doesn't hurt anyone to believe something false about the past.
Which, one, thanks for letting me know on my post that you think my job doesn't matter and what I do is pointless, if it doesn't really matter if we know the truth or make up lies about history because lies don't hurt anyone. But two, there are lots of reasons that it matters.
It encourages us to distrust historians when they talk about other aspects of history. You might think it's harmless to believe that Pharaoh Hatshepsut was trans. It's less harmless when you're espousing that the Holocaust wasn't really about Jews because the Nazis "came for trans people first." You might think it's harmless to believe that the French royalty of Versailles pooped and urinated on the floor of the palace all the time, because they were asshole rich people anyway, who cares, we hate the rich here; it's rather less harmless when you decide that the USSR was the communist ideal and Good, Actually, and that reports of its genocidal oppression are actually lies.
It encourages anti-intellectualism in other areas of scholarship. Deciding based on your own gut that the experts don't know what they're talking about and are either too stupid to realize the truth, or maliciously hiding the truth, is how you get to anti-vaxxers and climate change denial. It is also how you come to discount housing-first solutions for homelessness or the idea that long-term sustained weight loss is both biologically unlikely and health-wise unnecessary for the majority of fat people - because they conflict with what you feel should be true. Believing what you want to be true about history, because you want to believe it, and discounting fact-based corrections because you don't want them to be true, can then bleed over into how you approach other sociological and scientific topics.
How we think about history informs how we think about the present. A lot of people want certain things to be true - this famous person from history was gay or trans, this sexist story was actually feminist in its origin - because we want proof that gay people, trans people, and women deserve to be respected, and this gives evidence to prove we once were and deserve to be. But let me tell you a different story: on Thanksgiving of 2016, I was at a family friend's house and listening to their drunk conservative relative rant, and he told me, confidently, that the Roman Empire fell because they instituted universal healthcare, which was proof that Obama was destroying America. Of course that's nonsense. But projecting what we think is true about the world back onto history, and then using that as recursive proof that that is how the world is... is shoddy scholarship, and gets used for topics you don't agree with just as much as the ones you do. We should not be encouraging this, because our politics should be informed by the truth and material reality, not how we wish the past proved us right.
It frequently reinforces "Good vs. Bad" dichotomies that are at best unhelpful and at worst victim-blaming. A very common thread of historical misinformation on tumblr is about the innocence or benevolence of oppressed groups, slandered by oppressors who were far worse. This very frequently has truth to it - but makes the lies hard to separate out. It often simplifies the narrative, and implies that the reason that colonialism and oppression were bad was because the victims were Good and didn't deserve it... not because colonialism and oppression are bad. You see this sometimes with radical feminist mother goddess Neolithic feminist utopia stuff, but you also see it a lot regarding Native American and African history. I have seen people earnestly argue that Aztecs did not practice human sacrifice, that that was a lie made up by the Spanish to slander them. That is not true. Human sacrifice was part of Aztec, Maya, and many Central American war/religious practices. They are significantly more complex than often presented, and came from a captive-based system of warfare that significantly reduced the number of people who got killed in war compared to European styles of war that primarily killed people on the battlefield rather than taking them captive for sacrifice... but the human sacrifice was real and did happen. This can often come off with the implications of a 'noble savage' or an 'innocent victim' that implies that the bad things the Spanish conquistadors did were bad because the victims were innocent or good. This is a very easy trap to fall into; if the victims were good, they didn't deserve it. Right? This logic is dangerous when you are presented with a person or group who did something bad... you're caught in a bind. Did they deserve their injustice or oppression because they did something bad? This kind of logic drives a lot of transphobia, homophobia, racism, and defenses of Kyle Rittenhouse today. The answer to a colonialist logic of "The Aztecs deserved to be conquered because they did human sacrifice and that's bad" is not "The Aztecs didn't do human sacrifice actually, that's just Spanish propaganda" (which is a lie) it should be "We Americans do human sacrifice all the god damn time with our forever wars in the Middle East, we just don't call it that. We use bullets and bombs rather than obsidian knives but we kill way, way more people in the name of our country. What does that make us? Maybe genocide is not okay regardless of if you think the people are weird and scary." It becomes hard to square your ethics of the Innocent Victim and Lying Perpetrator when you see real, complicated, individual-level and group-level interactions, where no group is made up of members who are all completely pure and good, and they don't deserve to be oppressed anyway.
It makes you an unwitting tool of the oppressor. The favorite, favorite allegation transphobes level at trans people, and conservatives at queer people, is that we're lying to push the Gay Agenda. We're liars or deluded fools. If you say something about queer or trans history that's easy to debunk as false, you have permanently hurt your credibility - and the cause of queer history. It makes you easy to write off as a liar or a deluded fool who needs misinformation to make your case. If you say Louisa May Alcott was trans, that's easy to counter with "there is literally no evidence of that, and lots of evidence that she was fine being a woman," and instantly tanks your credibility going forward, so when you then say James Barry was trans and push back against a novel or biopic that treats James Barry as a woman, you get "you don't know what you're talking about, didn't you say Louisa May Alcott was trans too?" TERFs love to call trans people liars - do not hand them ammunition, not even a single bullet. Make sure you can back up what you say with facts and evidence. This is true of homophobes, of racists, of sexists. Be confident of your facts, and have facts to give to the hopeful and questioning learners who you are relating this story to, or the bigots who you are telling off, because misinformation can only hurt you and your cause.
It makes the queer, female, POC, or other marginalized listeners hurt, sad, and betrayed when something they thought was a reflection of their own experiences turns out not to be real. This is a good response to a performance art piece purporting to tell a real story of gay WWI soldiers, until the author revealed it as fiction. Why would you want to set yourself up for disappointment like that? Why would you want to risk inflicting that disappointment and betrayal on anyone else?
It makes it harder to learn the actual truth.
Historical misinformation has consequences, and those consequences are best avoided - by checking your facts, citing your sources, and taking the time and effort to make sure you are actually telling the truth.
14K notes · View notes