#Moses farrow

[michaelcosio]

Moses Farrow defends Woody Allen, claims Mia Farrow was abusive

May 24, 2018

The adopted son of filmmaker Woody Allen is defending his father against accusations Allen sexually assaulted his adopted daughter, Dylan Farrow, three decades ago. In a lengthy blog post, Moses Farrow said he "can no longer stay silent" and his father "continues to be condemned for a crime he did not commit." Bianna Golodryga reports.

[yourghastlycloseness]

beautiful bone structure: moses farrow

[pattyspatio]

Some States make birth certificates available to adoptees.

Adoption is not, in reality, the beautiful picture that government agencies and the adoption industry want everyone to see. Adoption is trauma and many adoptees feel like adoption stole their identity. Moses Farrow felt like adoption stole his identity. So much so that he became an adoption trauma coach and educator. Even more tragic, just recently BBC’s Eleanor Bradford “returned” a child that…

View On WordPress

[hearts-kingdom]

@didilydee I really appreciate you critically considering my discussion points and showing an interest in not spreading misinformation! OP blocked me so my post debunking their’s wouldn’t show up in their notes where other people could see it being criticized and to ensure I couldn’t respond to their reblog directly so it would look like I failed to offer a counter argument in order to give the illusion of them being in the right since it would apparently be too much of an effort for them to engage in an actual discussion where their claims could potentially be debunked. In any case, since their response involved you I felt as though you might be interested in considering giving it a look :)

Start Photos

End Photos

I used this particular article because it was a convenient compilation of facts from various certified legal sources that’s geared towards relaying those facts— not unsourced gossip. It contains links and references to the court documents and other certified sources within the article and the judge is not the sole source within each point that relays facts— not opinions. Therefore, it’s not clickbait unless you consider summaries of legal documents and testimonies clickbait. If you see something specific that’s not a fact outside of the closing statement that includes the author’s opinion, you’re more than welcome to say so.

I didn’t spam every single person who reblogged it with tags— I only brought this to the attention of those who had posted their own comments implying they were open to a discussion given their willingness to reconsider things when presented with facts. Even then, I didn’t tag everyone who commented— only a handful of people. You act like I was making a callout post towards them when I said, “This isn’t a callout post of course I just wanted to bring this information to the attention of individuals I noticed were reblogging with comments. Dylan Farrow and Soon-Yi are often mixed up with each other so I can see how this might be confusing in that sense. You’re not obligated to reblog my fact-checks of course but please consider at least deleting OPs misleading post from your dash to prevent spreading misleading information”, which can be found in my reblog. If they want to say something, let them say it— you don’t have to put words in their mouth akin to how you’re putting words in mine given the unwarranted accusations you attempted to make throughout your post.

It’s very telling of you to claim people who make an effort to be informative when encountering misleading information are “loony” while also acting as though my request for others to consider information you refrained from relaying was a callout rather than a request. I generally refrain from making unwarranted accusations towards people I discuss things with, but given your reaction it’s evident I’m not the one with issues here, so don’t try to project your own problems onto people who consider things critically just because you expect them to believe you with ease and without question on a public platform given how that would be rather loony. Everyone else I’ve had a discussion with on this matter thus far have at least been receptive regardless of where they stand agenda-wise. However, your decision to block me so that my post debunking your own wouldn’t show up in the replies along with your decision to attack my rhetoric without giving me a chance to defend it or criticize your own is another story entirely.

Again, you clearly care more about pushing an agenda here through being selective about the facts you choose to relay rather than addressing the fact that you purposefully left out legal information that didn’t align with your own. Your comments about the #MeToo movement make that evident given how you didn’t address the fact that I said, “Both Woody Allen and Mia Farrow were horrible people and the abuse they committed should not be politicized for the sake of pushing a feminist nor anti-feminist agenda.” You’ve become so obsessed with spewing misleading information to push your own agenda that you’d rather jump through obstacles than acknowledge that your cherry-picking argument is based off of that very agenda rather than the facts that overshadow your personal bias.

It’s interesting that you said, “the words of the person known to have abused and manipulated”, in regard to Moses given how this is known because of his and his siblings allegations that didn’t result in Mia being imprisoned yet you still obviously believe these allegations— as people should given the evidence despite Mia trying to dispute as much. However, you’re dismissing the allegations of Dylan, her mother, three witnesses, and Woody’s therapist who saw him for inappropriate behavior towards Dylan before Woody was even caught cheating. Bringing attention to your hypocrisy isn’t idiotic but nice try.

It’s also odd but not unsurprising that you’re saying Moses should be trusted in regard to denying Dylan’s trauma since that evidently aligns with the agenda you’re trying to push here in favor of dismissing all the other witnesses and legal officials that conflicts with your argument— such as Dylan, Mia, the three witnesses whose timelines aligns with Dylan’s story, the judge, the state prosecutor, Woody’s therapist, Dylan’s pediatrician, investigating officers, and even the state attorney.

I want to reiterate what I said before: “I don’t doubt Moses Farrow was abused by Mia in the least, but the source also brings attention to how Dylan’s story aligns with [four] other peoples [accounts]— not just Mia’s. Moses likely wasn’t present during the assault [itself], so he can’t say she wasn’t assaulted anymore than Dylan can say he wasn’t abused.”

As for the New-Haven Sexual Abuse Clinic, if you actually bothered reading through the article’s legal sources, accounts, and testimonies then you’d know that the doctor who signed off on the legal report you’re referring to never actually met Dylan personally to make an in-person assessment, no psychologists or psychiatrists were assigned to her panel, the notes regarding her evaluation were destroyed, her confidentiality wasn’t respected, this institution welcomingly invited Woody to profess his innocence when they should have remained professionally unbiased, and the judge and state prosecutor deemed this claim as unacceptable given that.

As for your defense of how Woody being a pedophile and assaulting Dylan would have been irrational... yes— you’re right. That’s the point and yet you still missed it somehow. Pedophiles aren’t rational in the risks they take as pedophiles. Your rhetorical questions usually don’t bode well for defending people accused of pedophilia given how it relies on defending their character and the characters of pedophiles don’t have much worth defending since their judgements are skewered, impulsive, and dangerous.

As for inconsistencies, you fail to address the inconsistencies about Woody’s story changing and you honestly just dug a deeper hole for yourself in regard to the attic thing given how Woody’s story pertained to a police report in which he told them he’d never been in the attic before changing his story and saying he had gone up there before.

Oh, an on another note... demeaningly claiming that an issue as complex as this one is something people should “obvious[ly]” be able to make sense of in attempt to make people feel foolish for not unquestioningly agreeing with you is not a very good look at all. It’s dangerous to suggest people shouldn’t be critical of the concepts you push onto them.

I can quote things, too, but from multiple sources instead of just cherry picking ones that align with pushing a specific agenda.

Judge Elliott Wilk, the presiding judge in Allen’s custody suit against Farrow, concluded that there is “no credible evidence to support Mr. Allen’s contention that Ms. Farrow coached Dylan or that Ms. Farrow acted upon a desire for revenge against him for seducing Soon-Yi.”

In his 33-page decision, Judge Wilk found that Mr. Allen’s behavior toward Dylan was “grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her.”

“You look at her [Dylan] in a sexual way. You fondled her . . . You don’t give her any breathing room. You look at her when she’s naked.”

Another babysitter told police and also swore in court that on that same day, she saw Allen with his head on Dylan’s lap facing her body, while Dylan sat on a couch “staring vacantly in the direction of a television set.” A French tutor for the family told police and testified that that day she found Dylan was not wearing underpants under her sundress. The first babysitter also testified she did not tell Farrow that Allen and Dylan had gone missing until after Dylan made her statements.

The state attorney, Maco, said publicly he did have probable cause to press charges against Allen but declined, due to the fragility of the “child victim.”

#me too #metoo #feminism #anti feminism #woody Allen #Dylan farrow #Mia farrow #Moses farrow #feminismisahatemovement #anyways I’m blocking them back so they don’t unblock me to try to get a word in and then block me before I can reply again

[woodyallenweb]

#Woody Allen #Moses Farrow #Film

[whentheleveebreaks1971]

#this is SO fucked #moses farrow #woody allen

[boxcarwild]

1) Moses Farrow claims that he was with Woody and Dylan when the molestation is alleged to have taken place, and that Mia later coached Moses (then 14) and Dylan (then 7) into claiming abuse from Woody. That has an obvious bearing on Dylan’s claims.

2) Woody Allen can technically still be prosecuted. 1992 is still within the statute of limitations for child molestation. Back then, he was investigated by 7 different investigators across two different states, who concluded that there was no case to answer. Two of whom said that they believed that Dylan Farrow had been coached by Mia. Woody Allen never had a trial because there was no need for one. He exceeds the legal standards of innocence, and there’s clearly a lot of reasonable doubt for anyone who hasn’t drunk an aquarium full of ideological Kool-Aid.

3) Allen didn’t marry his adopted daughter. This fact can be discovered with two minutes of Googling, and such ignorance makes it difficult to take people seriously on other subjects.

4) Freeman isn’t saying “Listen to women, but don’t believe them”. She’s saying don’t ignore women; rationally weigh up what they’re saying, and then decide if what they’re saying is credible. There has to be a middle-ground between ignoring women and descending into the condemn-first ask-questions-later mentality we’ve seen with Duke Lacrosse, Liam Allan, UVA and Emmet Till. Again, try not being so ideological.

5) Bill Cosby’s crimes fall outside the statute of limitations, which we can all agree sucks. But I find it curious that people aren’t campaigning for the statute of limitations to be abolished from now on, to prevent future Cosby-like cases, and are instead attempting to weave together some kind of conspiracy theory about how Western justice is useless and can therefore be tossed aside in favour of public humiliation. They clearly haven’t thought through the long-term consequences of this.

#woody allen #mia farrow #hadley freeman #moses farrow #metoo

[jerseydeanne]

Moses Farrow ‘happy’ to take Woody Allen’s name after ‘abusive’ childhood with Mia Farrow

Moses Farrow ‘happy’ to take Woody Allen’s name after ‘abusive’ childhood with Mia Farrow

View On WordPress

#last name #mia farrow #moses farrow #woody allen

[killingbambi]

Di quei casi in cui è difficile determinare quale versione è veritiera (so solo che spero sia questa), ma pare ci siano alte probabilità che Soon-Yi abbia ragione nel dire che Mia Farrow tanto a posto con la testa proprio non lo è.

#moses farrow #mia farrow #woody allen #dylan farrow #ronan farrow #soon-yi previn

[dailymarkhor]

Dylan Farrow Is Pushing Back After Her Brother Moses Said Woody Allen Never Assaulted Her by Buzzfeed

Dylan Farrow Is Pushing Back After Her Brother Moses Said Woody Allen Never Assaulted Her by Buzzfeed

[ad_1]

Dylan Farrow Is Pushing Back After Her Brother Moses Said Woody Allen Never Assaulted Her

back to top

View On WordPress

#Allen #Assaulted #Brother #BUZZFEED #Dylan #Farrow #moses #Pushing #Woody

[ladylingua]

It’s telling to me that one of the main defenses of Woody Allen is “Mia Farrow was actually abusive!” because it’s like...whether Mia Farrow is abusive or not actually has no bearing on whether Woody Allen has abused his daughter? Both can be true simultaneously? And in fact, if you know anything about how abusers target victims and take advantage of dysfunctional family dynamics to enable and hide their own abuse it’s more like “Yeah, that wouldn’t be all that surprising.” It just truly has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

I should also add that a lot of Farrow’s kids have spoken up and said she was never abusive, though respectfully, they can only speak to what they personally experienced or directly witnessed. I saw a lot of red flags from Farrow as well, but again that has no bearing on whether Dylan was abused by Allen. I don’t know the truth of Moses or Soon-Yi’s relationship with Mia Farrow, but I don’t need to discredit them to still believe Dylan.

#csa mention #tw csa #allen v. farrow #cw csa

[judgeofthepeople]

 Woody Allen

Hello dear Allen haters!

It is very cleat that Woody Allen likes young girls. If you have never seen one of his movies there is usually couple with big age difference. Just to name few:

Manhattan Irrational Man Magic in the Moonlight You will meet a tall dark stranger

His sexual abuse allegations towards Dylan Farrow are said to be false but looking in to his history and movie themes I do think he has done something her. And if he has you could say he is a true pedophile. Personally I think he already is one.

Here is something I found in Vanity Fair’s article about Allen’s allegations:

“Dylan’s claim of abuse was consistent with the testimony of three adults who were present that day. On the day of the alleged assault, a babysitter of a friend told police and gave sworn testimony that Allen and Dylan went missing for 15 or 20 minutes, while she was at the house. Another babysitter told police and also swore in court that on that same day, she saw Allen with his head on Dylan’s lap facing her body, while Dylan sat on a couch “staring vacantly in the direction of a television set.” A French tutor for the family told police and testified that that day she found Dylan was not wearing underpants under her sundress. The first babysitter also testified she did not tell Farrow that Allen and Dylan had gone missing until after Dylan made her statements. These sworn accounts contradict Moses Farrow’s recollection of that day in People magazine.”.

He may deny is involvement with Dylan but it’s hard to deny one with Soon-Yi Previn. I would say that Allen has groomed Previn. Actually it’s fact that he has done it. Even when she is not Allen’s daughter it still is very wrong to me because he has known her from young age. And to date your exes daughter is just wrong. Also she is 35-years younger than him meaning he truly could be her father. I do think age gap relationship are okay to certain point but their age difference is just too much.

Here is the Vanity Fair article:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2014/02/woody-allen-sex-abuse-10-facts

#woody allen #mia farrow #dylan farrow #allegations #irrational man #magic in the moonlight #you will meet a tall dark stranger #judgeofthepeople

[pattyspatio]

States that make birth certificates available to adoptees.

Adoption is trauma. Moses Farrow, like many others, believes that adoption stole his identity, So much so that he became an adoption trauma coach and educator. Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, and Instagram hosts thousands of platforms for individuals and groups of foster and adopted people. State agencies, CASA, churches, and adoption agencies paint a picture of adoption as being something…

View On WordPress

[hearts-kingdom]

The OP defending Woody Allen in this post blocked me when I brought up evidence as to why Woody is a pedophile. Given this, it’s pretty clear that they obviously had no counter evidence to the misleading claims they were making. Unsurprisingly, they did the easy thing and blocked me rather than address the fact that they were being deceptive in purposefully leaving out dire information regarding Farrow’s case that I brought up since they failed to include as much. Now, this ensures my response doesn’t show up on their post so they can continue spreading misinformation.

They were insisting Dylan Farrow’s trauma was a hoax and no more than a plublicity stunt created by the mother, Mia Farrow, as a claim to fame. They brought attention to Mia being an abusive mother towards Moses Farrow and used this to insist she was the real abuser. However, what they failed to understand was that both Mia and Woody were abusers— Woody molested Dylan and Mia abused Moses as well as her other children. Essentially, they weren’t in the wrong for calling out Mia’s abusive tendencies but they were absolutely in the wrong for excusing Woody’s. They could have brought attention to Mia being an abuser without undermining Dylan’s abuse.

I made this post to ask you to please consider reblogging the debunked linked version of the post instead of feminismisahatecrime’s (yes that’s their username) original misleading post to ensure misinformation isn’t further spread. If you reblogged their initial post, please consider deleting it and taking a look at the debunked one to see why their post is geared towards relaying misinformation that fails to address the primary legal aspects that weren’t in their claim’s favor. Furthermore, I believe this behavior should be brought attention to given how it’s one thing to share someone’s beliefs, but it’s another to be aware of how they practice those beliefs since practices can be unacceptable regardless of whether or not values may be shared. I would personally want to be aware of whether or not someone I looked up to did things such as this.

I appreciate everyone who has contributed to resisting misinformation by reblogging the debunked version so far!

That being said, please don’t derail this post. I don’t want to use this post to engage in drama regarding whether or not it’s okay to watch Woody’s content if you refrain from giving him profits in doing so. I also don’t want this to be derailed into a discussion about how he ended up marrying his wife’s of-age daughter after meeting her when he was over thirty years older than her, and so forth. Those are all valid things to discuss if you want to make your own post, but I don’t want this post to get derailed. This post is about the user I referenced valuing a boy’s allegations against his mother over a girl’s allegations against her father to push an agenda. The trauma of both Dylan and Moses should be respected and the abuse that both Mia and Woody engaged in should result in them being acknowledged as abusers. The Farrow siblings trauma is not meant to be pitted against one another and treated as a means of providing personal experiences to be drawn from selectively in order to push personal agendas. Their trauma is not something to invade with a bias in order to promote a misleading dictation of it for personal gain.

#feminism #anti feminism #me too #metoo #sexism #misogyny #misandry #Dylan farrow #woody Allen #Moses farrow #Mia farrow #feminismisahatemovement

[rememberingthesugden-dingles]

Have you read Moses Farrow's account (Ronan's adopted brother)? He didn't become a journalist he became a therapist, but the blog post/article he did in 2018 about his upbringing makes for interesting reading.

oh yeah i did, honestly this entire family makes my head hurt

#anonymous

[thestraggletag]

I hope Dylan Farrow is doing okay. Seeing a lot of reviews regarding the latest HBO documentary about Woody Allen, along with the expected stans come to Allen’s defence (“he wasn’t convicted!” “but what about what Moses said!” “Allen’s wife doesn’t feel like he groomed her!”), and I can’t imagine that being easy for her.