#Murtaza | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

xtruss · 5 days

Text

Lawsuit Links Wild UAE-Financed Smear Campaign To George Washington University

The Smears Spurred Austrian Police to Raid Islamophobia Scholar Farid Hafez’s Family Home. Then the Terrorism Charges Fell Apart.

— Murtaza Hussain | April 20, 2024 | The Intercept

Police raid a cultural center in Graz, Austria, as part of Operation Luxor, a dragnet of suspected Islamists, on Nov. 9, 2020. Photo: Erwin Scheriau/APA/AFP via Getty Images

Once A Well-Respected Public Commentator and Academic in His Native Austria, Farid Hafez’s life slowly began to unravel after rumors spread that he was an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood — allegedly a sleeper agent promoting extremism in the country.

“I used to be published every month in newspapers from both the left and right. I had a high profile in Austria, and people took me seriously,” Hafez said. “But some years ago, people started calling me to tell me that there were rumors about me spreading behind closed doors. I felt there was a difference, and that something was changing.”

“Eventually,” he said, “I was sidelined to such an extent that newspapers would not even publish me anymore.”

“I was sidelined to such an extent that newspapers would not even publish me anymore.”

Hafez’s growing ostracism in Austria culminated in a controversial police operation in 2020 called Operation Luxor. Hafez and others were targeted with raids and asset seizures. Hafez ultimately left Austria for the United States, where he took up a visiting professorship at Williams College in Massachusetts.

Operation Luxor was later deemed unlawful by Austrian courts, and the police’s terrorism charges against Hafez were eventually dropped. Today, the case is widely viewed as a witch hunt that targeted Austrian Muslims. Despite his exoneration, the damage to Hafez’s life from the yearslong ordeal have been immense.

“A lot of this has basically been about destroying my reputation,” he said. “Everybody knew that I was affected by this, even far from Austria.”

Little did Hafez know at the time, but the rumors about him and others in Austria originated from a research center at George Washington University and a prominent U.S.-based terrorism analyst there named Lorenzo Vidino, according to a lawsuit filed late last month. Hafez’s suit alleges fraud and racketeering, asking for $10 million in damages from Vidino, along with George Washington University and its Program on Extremism, the research center that Vidino heads.

The lawsuit, according to a press release, alleges that Hafez and others were targets of an organized smear campaign, accusing Vidino of “participating in a criminal enterprise that deployed fake journalists, social media bots and pay-to-play reporters to destroy the careers of dozens of individuals by constructing and disseminating false narratives linking them to the Muslim Brotherhood.” (Vidino and George Washington University haven’t filed a response to the lawsuit, and neither replied to requests for comment.)

The campaign against Hafez exploited an environment of suspicion that can result in Muslim or Arab scholars being targeted, said an academic who works on anti-Islam bias, noting that such campaigns often fixate on people whose work touches on politically sensitive subjects.

Farid Hafez, now a professor at Williams University, at a panel on Islamophobia in Istanbul on Oct. 19, 2017. Photo: Emrah Yorulmaz/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

“Farid Hafez is not the first Muslim professor to be targeted by ideologues who seek to silence and censor scholarship on Islamophobia, or Palestine, or anti-Arab racism,” said Sahar Aziz, a national security expert and director of the Center for Security, Race, and Rights at Rutgers University. “In the U.S., individuals who are critical of U.S. policy in the Middle East are often slandered as un-American or disloyal. In direct contradiction of American principles of academic freedom and free speech, Islamophobic organizations and government officials seek to censor Arab and Muslim professors when they disagree with the substance of their scholarship.”

“Meanwhile,” Aziz added, “in Europe there is vilification of almost any Muslim individual or group that is politically active, such that their activities are conflated with support for terrorism.”

GWU’s Lorenzo Vidino

Vidino worked with a private investigation firm in Switzerland that covertly spread spurious allegations against various Muslims in Europe, accusing them of involvement in terrorism and extremism, according to a report last year in the New Yorker.

Many of the details in the New Yorker, which are repeated in part in Hafez’s lawsuit, became public when hackers leaked internal communications from the firm behind the campaign, known as Alp Services. The hackers sent the files from Alp, another defendant in Hafez’s suit, to one of its intended targets: an American citizen living in Italy named Hazem Nada, who alleged in a separate lawsuit that his company and personal reputation were tarnished by unfounded accusations of terrorist financing.

The leak suggested that the operation was being financed to the tune of millions of dollars by the United Arab Emirates government as part of a broader campaign to destroy perceived ideological enemies in Western countries, and particularly those it accused of ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The UAE campaign reportedly targeted more than 1,000 people in 18 European countries.

Among those mentioned in the files as working with Alp was Vidino, who took a 3,000-euro consulting fee from the firm for “a series of gossipy reports about the Brotherhood’s reach,” according to a passage from the New Yorker quoted in Hafez’s lawsuit. The “gossipy reports,” which helped form the basis of the campaign on behalf of the UAE, appeared to consist of lists of suspected Islamists that Alp could then show it had discredited on behalf of its Emirati client. (Alp has neither responded to Hafez’s lawsuit nor a request for comment.)

In addition to his work with the Austrian government and George Washington University’s Program on Extremism, Vidino maintains public connections with think tanks based in the UAE, including the Abu Dhabi-based Hedayah, which is chaired by members of the royal family. Earlier in his career, he worked as a senior analyst at the Investigative Project on Terrorism, a think tank run by anti-Muslim activist Steve Emerson.

Lorenzo Vidino, of the George Washington University Program on Extremism, at a press conference following a meeting on radicalization with Italian officials in Rome on Jan. 5, 2017. Photo: Riccardo De Luca/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Nada filed his separate lawsuit against the government of the UAE, Vidino, Alp Services, and several others alleged to have been involved in the smear campaign against him. The UAE-sponsored campaign, the suit says, triggered a series of events that ultimately led Nada’s oil trading company, Lord Energy, to declare bankruptcy.

Nada is seeking $2.7 billion in damages and compensation. In addition to ideological reasons for the campaign against him, Nada’s lawsuit alleges that the UAE, a major oil and gas producer, had commercial motivations when it hired Alp Services to help shut his firm out of competing in the global energy market.

“The enterprise’s sham accusations that Hazim and Lord Energy were involved in terrorist financing were meant to — and did — eliminate a commercial competitor by causing banks and financial institutions to stop lending to Hazim and Lord Energy and causing other industry participants to stop doing business with Hazim and Lord Energy,” Nada’s lawsuit says.

The defendants in Nada’s case have not responded directly to the allegations against them, either in court or in the press.

Luxor’s Toll

Hafez would seem like an unlikely target for a smear campaign. A well-respected academic researcher in Austria, his work focused on documenting and combating anti-Muslim racism in Europe. He was a co-author of the European Islamophobia Report, a scholarly annual analysis of anti-Muslim discrimination on the continent, and was affiliated with a Islamophobia research center based out of Georgetown University.

Starting in 2015, Vidino began appearing as a public commentator and later working as a consultant with the Austrian government, focusing on issues of political Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood. Hafez said his reputation began to suffer around the same time.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a political movement mostly based in the Arab states, which has often clashed with the conservative monarchies in the region. The movement has been suppressed in countries like Egypt but remains a bogeyman for local leaders as well as right-wing groups in Western countries who have frequently accused Muslim political opponents of association with the group.

Hafez felt himself gradually becoming the target of these attacks. The accusations were often put forward vaguely in public where individuals or organizations were accused of “affiliations” with the Muslim Brotherhood rather than holding any concrete roles or membership. The allegations were amorphous enough that they were impossible to refute, or even challenge, mostly disseminated as they were through whisper campaigns spread through the Austrian government and security establishment.

After the smears took hold, Operation Luxor came down on the night of November 9, 2020. Hundreds of armed police officers raided the homes of Hafez and dozens of others, along with institutions they were affiliated with.

The search warrant used to justify the raid was based on a report authored by Vidino about the Muslim Brotherhood in Austria. Vidino also served twice as a witness for the Austrian government against targets in the case.

The Austrian government at the time — led by right-wing Chancellor Sebastian Kurz — celebrated the raids as a blow to “political Islam.” Despite these claims, however, the operation ultimately failed to uncover evidence of terrorism or even generate any arrests and convictions.

Despite being eventually exonerated by Austrian courts, Hafez’s career and reputation suffered in Austria and his financial assets were frozen. He has suffered ongoing stress — along with his family, including his young children who remain traumatized by the armed raid on their house in 2020.

“In a way, what Vidino was enabling was the criminalization of critical scholarship about Islam and anti-Muslim racism in Europe.”

The lingering impact of the smear campaign and raid on his life have now led Hafez to seek relief from American courts against Vidino, George Washington University, and Alp Services. A press release about Hafez’s lawsuit said, “Vidino presented himself as a disinterested academic with an expertise on terrorist figures and groups, feeding the narrative to both legitimate reporters and pay-to-play journalists, fellow academics and think-tanks that Hafez was deeply connected to the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Hafez knew that Vidino was antagonistic to his work on behalf of Muslim communities in Austria. The New Yorker article and Nada’s lawsuit, however, had raised more troubling questions. Vidino had, according to Hafez’s lawsuit, acknowledged that he strongly suspected the payment from Alp was coming from the Emirates. Hafez’s lawsuit said, “Alp and Dr. Lorenzo Vidino (‘Dr. Vidino’), with the assistance of the other co-defendants, targeted Dr. Hafez and others similarly situated because they saw him as a means of keeping their UAE gravy train rolling and veracity was simply beside the point.”

Hafez’s lawsuit, in other words, raises the possibility that Vidino’s advocacy may not have been merely ideological but driven by financial incentives from the UAE.

“In a way, what Vidino was enabling was the criminalization of critical scholarship about Islam and anti-Muslim racism in Europe,” Hafez said. “But when I first started looking into him, I was focused on his ideological ties to the far-right in the United States. I assumed that he was an ideologically inspired person. I had no clue whatsoever that the UAE was behind his work, and maybe even the main driver.”

0 notes

emergingpakistan · 10 months

Text

کراچی مئیر الیکشن اور معاشی صورتحال

کراچی میئر کے انتخابات میں تحریک انصاف کے 31 ارکان کے اغواء اور دھاندلی کے ذریعے پیپلز پارٹی کے امید وار مرتضی وہاب کی کامیابی نے وطن عزیز پاکستان کے انتخابی نظام سے متعلق کئی سوالات اٹھا دئیے ہیں؟ امر واقعہ یہ ہے کہ دھونس و جبر کے ذریعے دھاندلی زدہ الیکشن کو کراچی کے عوام آخر کیسے قبول کر سکتے ہیں۔ کراچی ایک سیاسی شعور رکھنے والا شہر ہے۔ اس کو اپنی حقیقی قیادت سے کیوں محروم کیا جا رہا ہے؟ یہ کیسا مذاق ہے کہ جماعت اسلامی کی حمایت کرنے والے تحریک انصاف کے اکتیس ارکان کو انتخابی عمل سے دور کر دیا گیا؟ جماعت اسلامی کی طرف سے مئیر کراچی کے امیدوار حافظ نعیم الرحمن کا میڈیا سے گفتگو کرتے ہوئے کہنا تھا کہ کراچی کے عوام کے حق پر ڈاکہ مارا گیا ہے اور وہ اس الیکشن کو تسلیم نہیں کرتے۔ حیران کن امر یہ ہے کہ ایک سو اکیانوے ارکان کی اکثریت رکھنے والے حافظ نعیم الرحمن کو ہرا دیا گیا ہے اور پیپلز پارٹی ایک سو تہتر ارکان کے ساتھ مرتضی وہاب کو جتوانے میں بالاآخر کامیاب ہو گئی۔ اس کا مطلب یہ ہے کہ اکثریتی مینڈیٹ رکھنے والی جماعت کا مئیر نہیں بننے دیا گیا۔ تحریک انصاف کے اکتیس ارکان کے لاپتہ ہونے کے بعد تو کراچی مئیر کے الیکشن کا سارا عمل ہی مشکوک ہو گیا ہے۔

حقیقت یہ ہے کہ پیپلز پارٹی کو کراچی میں اکثریتی مینڈیٹ رکھنے والی پارٹی جماعت اسلامی کو مئیر شپ دے دینی چاہئے تھی مگر افسوس ایسا نہیں ہو سکا۔ پیپلز پارٹی اگر کراچی میں حقیقی نمائندگی حافظ نعیم الرحمن کو دے دیتی تو شہر قائد کی حالت بدل جاتی اور ترقی کا عمل شروع ہو جاتا۔ حافط نعیم الرحمن نے بھی واضح طور پر پیغام دے دیا ہے کہ وہ کراچی کے عوام کے مینڈیٹ کو چرانے کی اجازت نہیں دیں گے۔ ان کا کہنا تھا کہ اکتیس ارکان کو اغواء کرنے اور کراچی کے مینڈیٹ کو ہتھیانے کے خلاف وہ پرامن احتجاج کریں گے اور قانونی راستہ اختیار کریں گے۔ اب پیپلز پارٹی اور سندھ حکومت کا یہ امتحان ہے کہ وہ اس سنگین اور مشکل صورتحال سے کیسے نکلتی ہے؟ حقیقت یہ ہے کہ کراچی مئیر کے الیکشن میں کھلم کھلا دھاندلی اور جبرو دھونس سے سندھ حکومت کی بدنامی اور جگ ہنسائی ہوئی ہے۔ اگر حافط نعیم الرحمن کراچی کا مئیر بن جاتا تو کون سی قیامت آجاتی؟۔ پیپلزپارٹی کو اپنے اس غیر جمہوری روئیے پر ضرور غور کرنا چاہئے۔

کراچی کی طرح پورے ملک میں عوام غیر یقینی کیفیت اور اضطراب میں مبتلاء ہیں۔ دن بدن بڑھتی ہوئی ہوشربا مہنگائی نے بھی غریب عوام کا جینا دوبھر کر دیا ہے۔ اب لوگ دو وقت کی بجائے ایک وقت کی روٹی کو بھی ترس رہے ہیں۔ تحریک انصاف کی طرح پی ڈی ایم کی حکومت نے بھی قوم کو مایوس کیا ہے۔ پی ڈی ایم کی حکومت نے گزشتہ ایک سال کے دور حکومت میں بد ترین معاشی کارکردگی دکھائی ہے۔ اب پاکستان کے عوام کی نظر یں اکتوبر میں عام انتخابات پر ہیں کیونکہ ملک کے تمام مسائل کا حل بروقت اور شفاف انتخابات میں ہے۔ مقام افسوس ہے کہ پی ڈی ایم کے بعض وزراء کی جانب اس سال اکتوبر میں الیکشن کی تاخیر کے بیانات آئے ہیں۔ یوں محسوس ہوتا ہے کہ پی ڈی ایم کی حکومت اکتوبر میں الیکشن نہیں چاہتی بلکہ وہ عام انتخابات کو اگلے سال تک لے جانا چاہتی ہے۔ انتخابات میں تاخیر جمہوریت کے لئے تباہ کن ثابت ہو سکتی ہے۔ اس لئے پی ڈی ایم سمیت تمام سیاسی جماعتوں کو اس بات کا ادراک ہونا چاہئے۔

عوام پی ٹی آئی اور پی ڈی ایم دونوں کی کارکردگی دیکھ چکے ہیں، سب نے عوام کو مہنگائی کے عذاب تلے دبائے رکھا، ان لوگوں کے پاس عوام کو ریلیف فراہم کرنے کے لئے کچھ نہیں ہے، نا اہل اور کرپٹ مافیا کو جب تک مسترد نہیں کر دیا جاتا، اور ملک کی بھاگ دوڑ ایماندار لوگوں کے سپرد نہیں کر دی جاتی اس وقت تک ملکی حالات بہتر نہیں ہو سکتے۔ وقت اور حالات نے ثابت کر دیا ہے کہ وطن عزیز میں چور دروازے سے جو بھی بر سر اقتدار آیا اس نے 25 کروڑ عوام کو صرف مایوس کیا ہے۔ اس نے لوٹ مار کر کے اپنی تجوریوں کو بھرا۔ ان کے نزدیک عوام کیڑے مکوڑے ہیں۔ پاکستان اس وقت نازک ترین موڑ پر پہنچ چکا ہے، پی ٹی آئی اور پی ڈی ایم اتحاد کی ناقص معاشی پالیسیوں کی وجہ سے ملک میں 10 کروڑ افراد سطح غربت سے نیچے زندگی گزارنے پر م��بور ہیں۔ زرمبادلہ کے ذخائر 4 ارب ڈالر سے بھی نیچے جا چکے ہیں۔ وفاقی بجٹ سے بھی قو م کو شدید مایوسی ہوئی ہے۔

طرفا تماشا یہ ہے کہ حالیہ وفاقی بجٹ 144 کھرب 60 ارب روپے کا ہے جو بجٹ 69 کھرب 24 کھرب خسارے کا بجٹ ہے۔ یہ محض الفاظ کا گورکھ دھندہ دکھائی دیتا ہے جس سے عوام کو کوئی ریلیف نہیں ملے گا۔ حکومت کو تنخواہوں اور پنشن میں بھی مہنگائی کے تناسب سے اضافہ کرنا چاہئے تھا۔ اسی طرح مزدور کی کم از کم اجرت 40 ہزار روپے کی جانی چاہئے تھی تاکہ مہنگائی سے تنگ عوام کی زندگی پر پڑنے والے اثرات کو کم کیا جا سکے۔ کم آمدنی والوں کے لئے تو وفاقی بجٹ میں توقع کے مطابق کچھ نہیں ہے۔ المیہ یہ ہے کہ معاشی استحکام اور مہنگائی کم کرنے کے لئے کوئی ٹھوس اقدام نہیں کیا گیا۔ مالی سال کے ابتدائی دس ماہ کے دوران مالیاتی خسارہ جی ڈی پی کا 4 اعشاریہ 6 فیصد جبکہ فی کس آمدنی ایک ہزار 568 ڈالر کی کم ترین سطح پر اور معیشت سکڑ کر 341 ارب ڈالر پر آ گئی ہے۔ اگر رواں سال اکتوبر میں صاف شفاف انتخابات ہونگے تو ہی سرمایہ کاروں کا اعتماد بحال ہو گا۔ اس وقت اضطراب اور بے یقینی کی کیفیت سرمایہ کاری کی راہ میں سب سے بڑی رکاوٹ ہے۔

محمد فاروق چوہان

بشکریہ روزنامہ جنگ

#Hafiz Naeem ur Rahman #Jamat-e-Islami #karachi #Mayor Karachi #Murtaza Wahab #Pakistan #PPP #PTI #World

0 notes