Tumgik
#im not saying you cant criticise these groups but is it criticism or is it propaganda
brw · 7 months
Text
"but hamas is getting funded by extremist islamic hate groups!" do you think the U.S. government and military giving funding for israeli's war efforts against palestinians is a morally neutral and inherently righteous body that had no influence in the politics of southwest asia as a global colonial superpower. do you really think anything you can say about the people resisting oppression can't be said about the oppressors.
737 notes · View notes
genderkoolaid · 2 months
Note
something ive noticed as a very effeminate trans masc that dresses pretty androgynous & has been on hrt for many years is that the status of being a "dangerous man" can and will be placed on you (ime most often by cis white women) whenever expressing any kind of negative feelings. if i told friends of mine - even queer ones - that something they did hurt my feelings or made me upset, i was suddenly a dangerous man or a (man)ipulator or whatever - even if i didn't raise my voice. the very fact that i am unhappy combined with my proximity to manhood makes me a supposed threat in their eyes.
a couple years ago i had a group of cis girl friends. they would constantly pull me into women's bathrooms n such so i wouldn't be left behind saying its fine its fine bc im one of the girls (gender neutral) but then as soon as i was upset about something i was suddenly a dangerous man who needed to stay out of women's spaces,,,, despite the fact that of the 4 of us, the girl who joined after me was the one spreading this shit around my friend group so... how was i encroaching on womens spaces if i was there before her and i was invited in? luckily one of my friends told me that the other two were plotting to kick me out of my friend group on the sole basis of my proximity to manhood so i at least knew why they were suddenly treating me like shit
its just.. i cant understand why people dont think trans mascs and trans men are discriminated against when they literally said it was my "toxic man energy" that made them want me out WHILE ALSO being the ones convincing me to go into womens spaces bc they wanted to go somewhere and didnt wanna have to leave me behind & like i said im extremely effeminate and faggy and also NONBINARY so i dont understand what "man energy" they were talking about other than the fact that im on testosterone and thinking testosterone = man is just transphobic no matter how you try to twist it
but my taking testosterone was never a problem or made me evil or scary when they wanted me to go with them into women-only (&nonbinary too i guess unless youre amab (and they can tell) or been on testosterone for too long) spaces, it was only a problem when they wanted 1. a reason to criticise me relentlessly, borderline bullying or 2. a reason to dismiss any of my concerns or criticisms of their treatment of me
all of that, to me, is transandrophobia point blank. i dont know what else you could call it other than transphobia, but transphobia doesn't address any of the very blatant and obvious connection of how my transness affects their perception of my proximity to manhood and how that affected the situation
God that sucks. I'm sorry you went through that.
You make a very good point. This is why I don't want to define transandrophobia/ATM as just transphobia and misogyny directed at transmascs. I still think transunity theory is a really valuable way of looking at transphobia & its important to me that we are vocal about how masculine tropes are weaponized against trans people by cis people on the regular because of how we are positioned in relation to gender. Too many people think the that the only thing wrong with saying trans people have "dangerous male energy" is that its misgendering. So trans people who choose to associate themselves with manhood are left in the trash by the people who should know best how much being made out to be a Dangerous Male Invader hurts!
315 notes · View notes
queerautism · 2 years
Note
the whole "ignoring DNIs" thing is dumb as hell. having boundaries doesnt make you untouchable, it cant shield you from criticism and accountability, and certain boundaries cant be completely off limits no matter what.
like holy shit, there is a difference between the completely reasonable boundary that calling people slurs or misgendering them against their will is a scummy thing even if said person is an asshole, and saying that the group that youre regularly attacking and/or invading the spaces of cant ever defend themselves against you, much less be mean about it
which yknow, is most often a result of being beaten down over and over again, being called a horrible person just for your existence, while also having said existence denied at the same time. you cant keep doing that shit to someone and then throw a hissy fit once they snap and throw courtesy out the window. they wouldnt react that way if they didnt have to constantly fight against attacks or sometimes outright misinformation campaigns against them! (btw im using they in the general sense- not specifically rouke or any of its members, but of course it does apply to it. i hope thats ok?)
if you made a DNI that said anti-endos cant interact, we all know that NONE of them would respect that, even if you were to stop interacting with any of them yourself. its lying of the most blatant kind to pretend its about "respecting boundaries" instead of doing everything in their power to silence the voices of the people they hate.
if it was about "respecting boundaries" and "just wanting to keep the communities separate", then they wouldnt be invading every tag or community related to endos and sending hate messages to blogs just for SUPPORTING endogenic systems (even if they arent endo themselves), or co-opting language that was created either for endos or specifically designed to be inclusive of all system types. even among those who *dont* do that (which if theyre a syscourse blog, almost never happens, because of the nature of a syscourse blog), you sure as fuck never see any of them try to intervene or criticise the sysmeds theyre all buddy-buddy with who ARE actively doing that shit, and im willing to bet its just because they agree with it but dont want to get called out on their hypocrisy. like jfc the amnt of times i see them say "we dont support fakeclaiming endos theyre just not systems" even though that like. still very much is constantly happening to everyone who doesnt fit within their limited frame of a "real system", whether theyre talking about an endogenic system or a traumagenic DID system that supports endogenics
if you truly dont support that behavior, then grow a fucking backbone and actually call it out when you see it! if you exclusively save your energy for yelling at endos and endo supporters and making shit up about them, rather than calling out legitimate toxic behavior regardless of the 'side' its coming from- youre a coward who only cares about the propaganda you want to spew, not about actually preventing harm or misinformation. if your asses cant even stop yourself from fucking over DID/OSDD systems (the very same people youre claiming to 'defend') just for disagreeing with you, then why are you even still trying to hide the real endgoal here? i mean we know why, because it doesnt make you look like the "good guys"- i wonder if theres a reason for that.
Yeah yeah yeah agreed on pretty much all counts tbh
25 notes · View notes
suizhou · 5 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
@jewishbow im responding publicly bc i like to maintain transparency and accountability and there's no mention of any of this discussion on ur blog so far. this isnt the first time you've used respectability politics w "non mlm" shit that you, as a white person, shouldn't have touched w a ten foot pole and all in defense of a fictional ship. there were two aspects i took issue w re: ur argument, both now and in the past:
1. the use of "non mlm" as if it can be a legit term when applied to the lgbt community. just say wlw instead and be done w it. respectability politics and the conceptualization of terms like non[identifier] [nonblack, non asian, non jewish (tho there's a jewish term for that ofc), non muslim, etc.] as a defense are used now on here mostly to draw attention to intercommunity issues where minority groups have intercommunity dynamics where, tho marginalized themselves, one group can oppressed other minority groups and are most appropriate when looked at thru a racial, gender specific, and religious lens. and to draw lines in the sand like "if u arent part of this group w these specific experiences listen to us and dont talk over us". i dont see how the group ur refering to as "non mlm" (aka wlws) can oppress or speak over mlm. misoyny exists and women arent oppressing men (aside from racially). why do you think your experiences as a white mlm are unique and that wlw cant feel the same pain as u (re: qbaiting)? why do you think wlw cant comment or criticise mlm over certain behaviours? do u think wlw dont face the same level of violent homophobia? do u think we somehow get homophobia Lite that we can oppress u for u to bring respectability politics into this?
it would be appropriate for a nonwhite mlm to even begin to think abt broaching discussions w respectability politics and that's bc of their unique experiences from their intersections of RACE (+religion) + sexuality. u, in this context, as a white kid dont really have anything special going on w u that u can tell me or other wlwoc what we can or cannot criticize in the name of "staying in our lanes".
2. ur really bringing this in when there are black and poc fans upset over allura RIGHT NOW and rightfully upset abt a ship like klance still getting to hijack the spotlight and upset about how most of yall klancers are racist abt both the ship and allura? like was this really an appropriate time for u to go "im sad about allura :( BUT LEMME GO ON ABOUT KLANCE FOR A BIT." idc about ur feelings bc u dont really seem to care about ours. regardless of whether u rbed it from someone or said it urself bc u've used respectability politics for this dumb shit several times before. so like, u do u and continue to be a dumbass ig just quit explaining shit to me like im gonna be chill w transparent excuses.
9 notes · View notes
willthoughtout-blog · 6 years
Text
To bear in mind when criticising Israel
Today, there was a protest outside Parliament attacking anti-Semitism within the Labour party, and specifically anti-Semitism within Corbyn’s faction of the Labour party.
This marks an important moment. As far as I’m aware, protests against institutional anti-Semitism are rare within the UK. When we think of racism here, we tend to think of anti-black or Islamophobic racism, among others. What this protest shows is that something has changed.
At the core of the protest is this:
The protesters say there is pervasive anti-Semitism within the Corbyn-led faction of the Labour party that is now dominant.
The counter-protesters say this is a) politically motivated (MPs known to dislike Corbyn took part) and b) the party is not anti-Semitic, it simply criticises the Israeli government.
So I want to talk about this notion that is frequently repeated by people I often agree with on other matters - that it ‘isn’t anti-Semitic to criticise Israel’.
I understand the logic of this argument. I held it too, I think, in a vague way before I took more interest in the topic. My first protest was a pro-Palestine, anti-Israel protest (my friend, who was more into it, dragged me along - I didn’t know the first thing about the situation to be honest).
So I understand the logic of those attacking the anti-Semitism protesters. But I disagree. I don’t think saying ‘it isn’t anti-Semitic to criticise Israel’ is good enough. This is for a number of reasons. Firstly, because it is often false - it ignores the fact that many who criticise Israel are anti-Semitic, especially within these groups Corbyn associates with. And secondly, because there are massive consequences of such a casual attitude to anti-Semitism - this racism is on the rise in UK politics, in large part because of these groups. And, to be honest, I’m not a massive fan of increasing racism.
The UK left, and anti-Semitism
There seems to me to be 2 potential reasons why someone might criticise the current Israeli government:
Genuine disgust for the crimes committed by the Israeli government (I share this opinion)
Hatred for Jewish people (because of Israel’s status as a Jewish state)
The UK left has been massively focused on the Israel-Palestine conflict for years now. Unfortunately, I think this is a meshing of the 2 reasons above, rather than a pure governmental critique.
The evidence for this is not hard to find.
Corbyn, for example, has campaigned in many pro-Palestine groups and events that I’m sure are perfectly well-intentioned. He has, however, supported groups strongly linked to Holocaust deniers. The latest controversy, which sparked today’s protests, were about the following mural:
Tumblr media
This is so blatantly filled with anti-Semitic tropes, it’s difficult to even know where to start. The rich bankers, the large noses, the Illuminati conspiracy triangle. And the controversy is that Corbyn defended the artist who designed this, when he said it was being removed.
Another prominent leader of this group is Ken Livingstone (former 2-term Labour Mayor of London), a close ally of Corbyn’s. He’s made such a range of dubious comments about Jews, it’s difficult to know where to start (just check his Wikipedia page out). Corbyn was recently lenient on him when he seemed to suggest that Hitler wasn’t fundamentally so anti-Jew, it was just that he ‘went a bit crazy’.
There are others - it is far from just those at the top - but these are the 2 most powerful and prominent people in this faction.
Anti-semitism on the UK Right
A further problem is that anti-Semitism is not just confined to the likes of Corbyn and Livingstone. It is spreading across our society, and has popped up in the far right areas too.
Nigel Farage, for example, said recently that the ‘Jewish lobby’ has too much influence on US politics. He has also attacked George Soros, a Hungarian Jewish billionaire, for being some sort of traitor against Britain. As a Jewish billionaire (who, incidentally, has done lots of great pro-democracy work), it’s mind-numbingly predictable that he would be the subject for anti-Semitic attacks.
And this is occurring in more than just the fringe Ukip-parts of the conutry. This was the Telegraph’s front page recently, written by the former right-hand man of our current Prime Minister:
Tumblr media
The anti-Semitic tropes (a rich Jew, ‘secret plot’, subverting our democracy etc) are again so blindingly obvious.
The emerging picture
The point is that we are a country experiencing a rise in anti-Semitism. This cannot be overlooked.
And this is not just happening in the UK, but across the world. Conspiracies about Jewish media and financial elites, George Soros, the Rothschilds, etc are international phenomena. This is because anti-Semitism (like many of other forms of prejudice) transcends country lines.
For proof, just check out the anti-Semitism Wikipedia page. There’s a whole host of examples:
A massacre in Germany in 1096
An expulsion from England in 1290
A massacre in Spain in 1391
An expulsion from Spain in 1492
A massacre in Ukraine in the 1650s
Pogroms in Russia throughout the 1800s
And so on.
Anti-Semitism has been going on for a millenium or more. It is serious. And it’s becoming bigger in the UK right now.
Criticising Israel
This of course doesn’t mean that someone can’t criticise Israel - indeed, in my opinion, we all should criticise the Israeli government. Its crimes against the Palestinians are horrific.
But it’s important to notice who you’re agreeing with and standing alongside when you do this.
When I criticise Jeremy Corbyn (who I helped elect as leader of the Labour party), or Ken Livingstone (who I think was a really good Mayor on the whole), I’m criticising people who I have time for, and share some common ground with.
Too often it feels like people on the left are unwilling to criticise other people in their own tribe.
And other people don’t criticise this for another reason - that they aren’t too bothered about other people, they just want to shine a light on this critical issue of the Israeli government’s crimes against the Palestinian people.
But what does that say, if you’re willing to stand alongside anti-Semites and Holocaust deniers? What does that say to the Jewish people in the UK?
It’s possible and commendable to criticise the Israeli government. Just make sure you’re paying attention to how you do it.
18 notes · View notes