#john ducey

[candy-pants]

#disneyedit #disneychanneledit #jonas #kevin jonas #chelsea kane #joe jonas #nick jonas #john ducey #meus #usereasthigh #tusernatasha #userstefanie #hey let's bring back plobnrg

[thewomanwhowatchedchristmas]

I Believe in Santa (2022)

This one was... interesting.

So, our main character Lisa (Christina Moore), is a writer, but seems like mostly opinion pieces, so not quite journalism but not quite creative writing either. The kind of writer which requires the least work and the least talent. Off to a great start. We open on Lisa at the 4th of July writing an article about how Independence Day is a better holiday than Christmas. Which is a strong opinion to have. Liking the 4th of July is completely fine and normal, but I don't like comparing national holidays to religious traditions because they don't feel like the same category to me. I could go on, but I want to focus on the movie.

Lisa has an 8 year old named Ella (Violet McGraw). It's a recurring plot device that Ella's dad makes promises to both Lisa and Ella and makes last minute excuses to not show up frequently. This is how Lisa and her best friend Sharon (Lateefah Holder) end up at a summer fair for Ella's dance group performance when Ella gets lost in front of the free legal advice booth (which is not a thing I've ever encountered and I am a fan of fairs generally). Tom (John Ducey) notices that Ella looks lost and scared pretty quickly, takes her out of the crowd so she doesn't get more lost, and sends his friend (who is also working the booth) Assan (Sachin Bhatt) to the lost children booth (also not a thing I've seen, but this does seem more likely, and I don't have children yet, so I might have just not noticed). Nobody is working at the lost children booth, but it's fine because Lisa happens to walk by and see Ella, which is how Lisa and Tom meet.

The movie skips ahead to the end of November, and Lisa and Tom have been together the whole time and Tom already has a good relationship with Ella. But Lisa finds out Tom loves Christmas (like, a very uncomfortable amount) and has a freak out about it, but they don't break up. This happens a few times, actually, where Lisa finds out more about the depth of Tom's love for Christmas, freaks out about it, but they stay together because they love each other. It's only weird because it doesn't actually seem like Lisa and Tom love each other in the movie at any point. Like, watching them kiss is kinda weird. Most healthy, sane people who find out their partner has a weird obsession would also just shrug it off as a quirk.

The main conflict is kind of stupid. I watched this movie less than 24 hours ago and fully forgot what even happened for a minute. I had to try to remember what led to the breakup. It seems even more stupid once the resolution happens.

Ok, so it wasn't like painful to watch. The acting wasn't terrible, there was just no chemistry between the people who were supposed to have chemistry. Tom is most likely a serial killer (I'm pretty sure they make jokes about this in the movie). Lisa sucks. Sharon is just kinda there so Lisa has someone to talk to. Assan is the best character in the movie and he doesn't get any good lines until the conflict (rip off). It feels mean to rate it this low, but any higher would be lying. Overall, 1 star.

#christmas #review #movie review #netflix #christmas movies #christmas movie #christmas movie review #2022 #i believe in santa #christina moore #john ducey #violet mcgraw #sachin bhatt #lateefah holder

[politicaldilfs]

Arizona Governor DILFs

Evan Mecham, Fife Symington, Sidney Osborn, Benjamin Baker Moeur, Jack Williams, John Howard Pyle, Samuel Pearson Goddard Jr., TBD, Dan Edward Garvey, Doug Ducey, Robert Taylor Jones, Rawghlie Clement Stanford, Ernest McFarland, Raúl Héctor Castro, Bruce Babbitt, Paul Fannin

#Evan Mecham #Fife Symington #Sidney Osborn #Benjamin Baker Moeur #Jack Williams #John Howard Pyle #Samuel Pearson Goddard Jr. #TBD #Dan Edward Garvey #Doug Ducey #Robert Taylor Jones #Rawghlie Clement Stanford #Ernest McFarland #Raúl Héctor Castro #Bruce Babbitt #Paul Fannin #GovernorDILFs

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

People will no longer be allowed to take close-range recordings of Arizona police under a new bill signed into law by Gov. Doug Ducey on Wednesday.

House Bill 2319, sponsored by Rep. John Kavanagh, makes it illegal for anyone within 8 feet of law enforcement activity to record police. Violators could face a misdemeanor, but only after being verbally warned and continuing t o record anyway.

Exceptions were made for people at the center of an interaction with police, anyone standing in an enclosed structure on private property where police activity was occurring and occupants of a vehicle stopped by police as long as recording in those instances didn't interfere with police actions.

It goes into effect on Sept. 24.

Kavanagh wrote in an op-ed said HB 2319 was meant to protect officers from potential harm or distraction outside of the incident they were already involved in. He initially introduced the bill with a 15-foot restriction that was later amended down to address concerns it would be unconstitutional.

But many people, including First Amendment experts, continued to oppose the bill, stating it was unconstitutional at its core, lacked specificity and granted police too much discretion. Various news organizations, including Gannett, the company that owns The Arizona Republic, also signed letters from the National Press Photographers Association opposing the bill.

Bystander videos of police have become increasingly common and, at times, expose police misconduct. It was instrumental in the case against former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin, who was filmed killing George Floyd and ultimately convicted for his murder.

#us politics #news #the arizona republic #arizona #police the police #stop police brutality #police brutality #Gov. Doug Ducey #Rep. John Kavanagh #HB 2319 #first amendment violation #first amendment #1st amendment #2022 #police state #fascist police state

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Arit John and Cheri Mossburg at CNN:

CNN — 

The Republican-controlled Arizona House of Representatives once again failed to advance a repeal of the state’s 160-year-old abortion ban Wednesday, days after the state Supreme Court roiled state politics by reviving the law. The vote is a blow to reproductive rights as well as GOP candidates in competitive races, who have been scrambling to distance themselves from the court’s decision. Republicans facing competitive races in the state, including former President Donald Trump and US Senate candidate Kari Lake, called on the GOP-controlled legislature to work with Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs to take a more moderate path. On Wednesday, following two attempts to discuss a bill that would repeal Arizona’s 1864 ban on abortions, lawmakers voted not to discuss the measure on the House floor. The representatives’ votes were evenly split, with the chair making the tie-breaking decision. The bill itself was not brought up for a vote. “The last thing we should be doing today is rushing a bill through the legislative process to repeal a law that has been enacted and affirmed by the legislature several times,” House Speaker Ben Toma said during debate.

If the 1864 law were repealed, Arizona would revert back to a 15-week abortion restriction signed into law in 2022 by then-Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican. The state court delayed enforcement of the ban for at least 14 days to allow plaintiffs to challenge it, meaning abortions are still allowed in the state. The ban prohibits the procedure except to save the life of the pregnant person and threatens providers with prison sentences between two and five years. If the 1864 law goes into effect, Arizona would join 14 states that have passed near total abortion bans, some with no exceptions for victims of rape or incest. State lawmakers last week ended a House session early to block an effort to repeal the abortion ban. And on Monday, House Republicans’ general counsel laid out a strategy to defeat or dilute the impact of a potential abortion rights ballot initiative in a leaked memo.

Shame on the Arizona GOP lawmakers for voting against a bill that would repeal its draconian 1864 anti-abortion law.

#Arizona #Abortion Bans #Abortion #Anti Abortion Extremism #Arizona House of Representatives

[partisan-by-default]

People will no longer be allowed to take close-range recordings of Arizona police under a new bill signed into law by Gov. Doug Ducey on Wednesday.

House Bill 2319, sponsored by Rep. John Kavanagh, makes it illegal for anyone within 8 feet of law enforcement activity to record police. Violators could face a misdemeanor, but only after being verbally warned and continuing to record anyway.

Exceptions were made for people at the center of an interaction with police, anyone standing in an enclosed structure on private property where police activity was occurring and occupants of a vehicle stopped by police as long as recording in those instances didn't interfere with police actions.

[the-invisible-queer]

John Ducey is forever burned in my brain as Dad Lucas

Like I will never see the man as anyone else other than the Jonas TV dad

And I apologize to that man

Because I have see some of his other work through out the years but it's always "THATS THE DAD FROM JONAS"

[xtruss]

How Major University Discriminated Against White And Asian Candidates

— January 04, 2024 | Newsweek | Sean O'Driscoll

The University of Washington Campus on March 6, 2020, in Seattle, Washington. The university has taken action against anti-white and anti-Asian discrimination in the psychology department (Karen Ducey/Getty Images)

The University of Washington has revealed that "An Internal Whistleblower" exposed discrimination against white and Asian job candidates in its Psychology Faculty.

An internal report found that a third-placed job applicant, who was Black, was given a tenure-track assistant professor job last April, above white and Asian candidates who were ranked higher in the selection process.

Other violations included excluding white staff from meetings with job candidates, deleting a passage from a hiring report to hide discrimination, and discussing ways to "think our way around" a Supreme Court ruling that barred affirmative action in colleges.

A UW spokeswoman told Newsweek on Thursday that the case was exposed when "the dean of the College of Arts & Sciences, responding to an internal whistleblower, requested an internal review of this process by what was then called UCIRO (University Complaints, Investigation and Resolution Office) and is now the Civil Rights Investigation Office."

The psychology faculty has been barred from hiring tenured staff for two years as a result.

The UW report found that when five finalists for a tenure-track assistant professor position were selected in January 2023, they were due to be interviewed by the Women Faculty and Faculty of Color groups.

The report also said a member of the Faculty of Color did not want any white women at the meeting and complained that the interviews were "awkward" when there was a white candidate. The names of everyone involved are redacted from the UW report.

"As a person who has been on both sides of the table for these meetings, I have really appreciated them," the person wrote in an email. "Buuut, when the candidate is White, it is just awkward. The last meeting was uncomfortable, and I would go as far as burdensome for me. Can we change the policy to not do these going forward with White faculty?"

In 1998, Washington state passed a referendum banning race-based hiring in universities, which appears to have been ignored by the psychology department.

The report suggests that faculty members tried to hide the extent to which race was considered, including in the hiring report.

"I advise deleting the statement below as it shows that URM [underrepresented minority] applications were singled out and evaluated differently than non-URM applications (which is not allowed as [name redacted] noted)," one email read, according to the report.

An unnamed person wrote in another email, in March, that they were inclined to hold Faculty of Color meetings just for candidates of color.

This person also wanted some way around the then-pending 2023 case of Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which banned race as a basis for college admission. The case was taken by a group of Asian-American students who had unsuccessfully applied to Harvard.

"My inclination is to hold these meetings only for POC [People of Color] candidates. I'm also mindful that our Provost is now getting anxious about anything that's directed to only some identity groups (i.e., they are getting worried about fallout from the pending Supreme Court affirmative action rulings)," this person wrote in an email.

"My read is that they'll get fearful of litigation and overcorrect into colorblindness. Maybe our committee can preemptively think our way around this type of future directive," the faculty member wrote.

The university's public record office had planned to release staff emails on December 14 to John Sailer, a senior fellow at the conservative-leaning National Association of Scholars, an organization which campaigns against race-based admissions and hiring policies in universities.

In an email seen by Newsweek, the public records office informed Sailer that the requested records won't be released in full until April 26, 2024.

The UW spokeswoman told Newsweek on Thursday that "Mr. Sailer's first public records request on this was submitted on April 5, 2023.

"These requests are processed on a first-in, first-out basis and some are more complicated than others; his request was quite comprehensive, requiring significant review and redaction considerations, and as a result, it is still in progress. Mr. Sailer also has seven active records requests and these, again, are being processed on a first-in, first-out basis."

The university announced on its website that the psychology department is now "barred from conducting searches for tenured and tenure-track faculty positions" for at least two years, "subject to review by the Provost's Office."

It also said the department will "undergo a comprehensive review and revision of its hiring processes," and all department members "will receive training on how to conduct searches consistent with law and policy."

"The University is taking personnel action to address individual actions," the statement added. "These proceedings are confidential."

A substantial number of redacted emails are included in the university's report, which was released on October 31 and is published on its website.

Sailer told Newsweek the UW report "shows universities — professors and administrators alike — discriminate with a total sense of impunity. It's an egregious example, notable for how much is in writing, but it really is just one more example."

"This kind of discrimination in the name of "equity" is commonplace, even when blatantly illegal. And that's instructive in light of Students For Fair Admissions," he said.

"UW insists that its investigation had nothing to do with my public records request. I'm not so sure about that. After all, until its investigation, administrators from the university promoted the psychology department's hiring framework, which the university has now deemed to be in violation of its non-discrimination policy. That's a big reversal," he said.

On its website, UW's psychology department lists its first mission as promoting social equity "by investigating biased attitudes, inequities, and disparities... by redesigning organizational practice" and "by solving social justice issues."

— Sean O'Driscoll is a Newsweek Senior Crime and Courts Reporter based in Ireland 🇮🇪. His focus is reporting on U.S. law. He has covered human rights and extremism extensively. Sean joined Newsweek in 2023 and previously worked for The Guardian, The New York Times, BBC, Vice and others from the Middle East. He specialized in human rights issues in the Arabian Gulf and conducted a three-month investigation into labor rights abuses for The New York Times. He was previously based in New York for 10 years. He is a graduate of Dublin City University and is a qualified New York attorney and Irish solicitor.

#Sean O'Driscoll #Newsweek #Discrimination #Major University #The University of Washington

[dertaglichedan]

How a Saudi firm tapped a gusher of water in drought-stricken Arizona

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/how-a-saudi-firm-tapped-a-gusher-of-water-in-drought-stricken-arizona/

BUTLER VALLEY, Ariz. – A megadrought has seared Arizona, stressing its rivers and reservoirs and reducing water to a trickle in the homes of farmworkers near this desert valley.

But green fields of alfalfa stretch across thousands of acres of the desert land, shimmering in the burning sunlight. Wells draw water from deep underground, turning the parched earth into verdant farmland.

For nearly a decade, the state of Arizona has leased this rural terrain west of Phoenix to a Saudi-owned company, allowing it to pump all the water it needs to grow the alfalfa hay – a crop it exports to feed the kingdom’s dairy cows. And, for years, the state did not know how much water the company was consuming.

The lack of information was a choice.

Soon after the company, Fondomonte Arizona, arrived in the Butler Valley in 2015, state planners suggested asking the company to install meters and report its water use, according to a memo reviewed by The Washington Post. That way, the memo argued, the state could “at least obtain accurate information” on water drained from the valley – water that could otherwise serve as backup for booming urban areas.

But the proposal “hit a stone wall,” John Schneeman, one of the planners, told The Post. It was spurned, he said, by officials in the administration of then-Gov. Doug Ducey (R) who were “cautious of tangling with a powerful company.” The proposal also ran headlong into a view, deeply held in the rural West, that water is private property that comes with access to land, rather than a public resource.

The inaction was an early sign of how state officials gave leeway to Fondomonte as a global fight for water took root in the Arizona desert. Leaving water unprotected amid a drought worsened by climate change has been a boon to Saudi Arabia, where industrial-scale farming of forage crops such as alfalfa is banned to conserve the Persian Gulf nation’s limited water supply.

A Post investigation – based on government documents and interviews with public officials, ranchers in the valley, farmworkers, and townspeople who live near the alfalfa fields – found that Arizona’s lax regulatory environment and sophisticated lobbying by the Saudi-owned company allowed a scarce American resource to flow unchecked to a foreign corporation. To advance its interests before the state, Fondomonte hired an influential Republican lawyer as well as a former member of Congress. And it sought to win over its rural neighbors, providing a high school with donations that included Fondomonte-sponsored sports bags and face masks emblazoned with the company logo to protect students from covid.

David Kelly, Fondomonte’s general manager, said the company follows the same rules that govern farming operations throughout the state while going out of its way to save water and serve the community.

“All we ask is to be measured according to the same standards as every other farming leaseholder on state land,” he said in an email. “Fondomonte has developed Butler Valley to be one of the most efficient and highly productive farms in not only Arizona, but the entire Southwest. Our Butler Valley operation utilizes best-in-class irrigation technology and equipment with the oversight and diligence of an experienced management team.”

Fondomonte, he said, “should be heralded for its water efficiency.”

State officials now acknowledge that decades of farming and explosive growth have dangerously diminished Arizona’s water reserves. The rising scarcity has deepened rifts between urban and rural communities and turned Fondomonte into a political flash point. The company is hardly alone in using state-owned land to irrigate crops: Fondomonte holds four of the roughly 20 state agricultural leases across Arizona’s three major transport basins, where state law allows transfer of water to cities. But its foreign ownership and strict limits on water use in its home country have fueled outrage here.

CONTINUED

[apwmagazine]

More About His Daughter Emma Ashton

More About His Daughter Emma Ashton

Fans are curious to know about John Ducey children as there was some news about the actor being gay.  American actor John Joseph Ducey has starred in more than 20 television programs, mostly comedies. Ducey frequently plays the “ideal dad” or “perfect boyfriend” in various comedies, including Caroline in the City and the 1998 revival of Fantasy Island, because of his “everyman” appearance. Ducey…

View On WordPress

[newsconduct]

I Believe In Santa Movie Trailer Is Out Now Christina Moore & John Ducey Lead Charming Holiday

I Believe In Santa Movie Trailer Is Out Now Christina Moore & John Ducey Lead Charming Holiday

Most people worldwide make it a point to gather with loved ones to honor Christmas as the time of year when these values are most centrally honored. Although the holiday season is meaningful to many, not everyone celebrates it similarly. So, how do we handle a new couple with opposing opinions on the holiday? This concept is hinted at in the preview for the new romantic Christmas comedy, I…

View On WordPress

[movienation]

Netflixable? Finding love with Christmas Fanatic -- "I Believe in Santa"

Netflixable? Finding love with Christmas Fanatic — “I Believe in Santa”

Hallmark of a Hallmark style holiday romance? The pretty single woman/divorced mom always falls for a guy who moisturizes and uses more makeup than her. As Netflix has made “OutHallmarking Hallmark” a core tenet of its business model, you can see this scenario play out a half dozen times in any given year’s Netflix Christmas movies. John Ducey, a veteran actor whose TV credits go back nearly 30…

View On WordPress

[fusdbcom]

I Believe in Santa Handlung, Kritik, Besetzung | Netflix

I Believe in Santa Handlung, Kritik, Besetzung | Netflix

I Believe in Santa Movie I Believe in Santa ist ein amerikanischer Film, der am 14. Dezember 2022 veröffentlicht wurde. Es wurde auf Englisch gedreht. Netflix ist die Originalproduktion. Der Film, der 1 Stunde und 29 Minuten lang ist, ist in der Kategorie Romantische Komödie. Regie führte Alex Ranarivelo, das Drehbuch schrieb John Ducey. Zur Besetzung gehören Christina Moore, John Ducey, Violet…

View On WordPress

#Dezember 2022 Film #I Believe in Santa #I Believe in Santa besetzung #I Believe in Santa cast #I Believe in Santa handlung #I Believe in Santa imdb #I Believe in Santa kritik #I Believe in Santa netflix

[dlflswls0178]

환혼 시즌2 빛과 그림자 2화 2회 넷플릭스

환혼 시즌2 빛과 그림자 2화 2회 넷플릭스 다시 보기 가능합니다.

환혼 시즌2 빛과 그림자 2화 2회 무료보기 <<

E02 재방송 실시간으로 시청 바랍니다.

자유주의 운동가들은 Kyrsten Sinema 상원의원이 민주당을 버리고 독립기를 게양하겠다고 최근 발표한 후 원하는 바를 정확히 얻었습니다. 46세의 그녀는 활동가들이 그녀를 화장실 마구간으로 쫓아가고 그녀가 주례한 결혼식에서 새가 그녀를 괴롭힌 지 약 1년 후에 폭탄을 떨어뜨렸습니다. 세레모니. Sinema 씨는 자신이 그런 종류의 부족주의에 질렸다는 점을 분명히 했습니다. 독립으로 등록하고 독립 타이틀로 작업하는 것은 내가 항상 누구였는지를 반영하는 것이며 애리조나가 누구인지를 반영하는 것입니다.”라고 그녀는 비디오에서 말했습니다. "우리는 시키는 일을 하기 위해 줄을 서지 않고 우리 주와 국가를 위해 옳은 일을 합니다." 그녀가 재선에 출마할지 여부를 밝히지 않은 Sinema 씨는 "우리 주를 위한 독립적인 목소리"가 되겠다는 약속을 지키고 있다고 말했습니다. “애리조나는 투쟁 앞에서 물러서지 않는 목소리를 낼 자격이 있습니다.”라고 그는 말했습니다. "안타깝게도 Sinema 상원의원은 애리조나 주민들을 위해 일을 처리하는 것보다 자신의 이익을 우선시하고 있습니다." 애리조나 GOP의 전략가인 Barrett Marson은 시네마 뉴스가 "지저분한" 동시에 "완전히 놀랍지 않다"고 말했습니다. "그녀는 왼쪽에서 그녀를 상대로 출마할 Ruben Gallego와 함께 불가능한 예비 선거를 치르게 될 것입니다."라고 Mr. Marson이 말했습니다. "시네마는 1년 중 더 좋은 시간 동안 민주당 내부에서 불가사의한 인물이었으며 이것은 그녀가 더 이상 민주당원이 아니며 민주당원들이 그녀를 좋아하지 않는다는 현실을 반영할 뿐입니다." “민주주의 운동가들은 광범위하게 시네마를 싫어했습니다.”라고 마슨 씨는 말했습니다. "시네마를 가지느니 차라리 공화당원에게 자리를 뺏길 것이라고 생각합니다." 공화당의 경우 이번 발표로 Doug Ducey 애리조나 주지사의 2024년 계획에 초점이 맞춰졌습니다. 인기 있는 공화당원은 임기 제한 때문에 재선에 도전할 수 없었고, 시네마 여사가 출마하든 안 하든 총선에서 민주당원들에게는 힘든 일이 될 것입니다. 공화당원들은 올해 마크 켈리 상원의원에 맞서도록 듀시 씨를 로비했습니다. Ducey 씨는 훔친 선거 주장을 받아들이지 않았다는 이유로 Donald Trump 전 대통령으로부터 비난을 받은 후 통과했습니다.

켈리 씨는 조작된 선거 주장을 받아들인 트럼프의 지���을 받는 공화당원인 블레이크 마스터스를 상대로 거의 5점 차로 승리했습니다. Sinema 씨는 2019년에 취임한 후 자신을 주도적인 중도파로 자리 잡았습니다. 그 역할은 자유주의자들을 격분시켰고, 특히 민주당원들이 그들의 의제를 강제할 수 있도록 상공회의소의 필리버스터 규칙을 폭파하는 데 도움을 주기를 꺼려했습니다. 필리버스터를 온전하게 유지하자는 그녀의 지지는 비난을 불러일으켰고 예비 선거를 요구했습니다. 좌절감은 작년에 애리조나에 있는 Living United for Change in Arizona의 활동가들이 그녀를 강사로 있는 Arizona State University의 화장실로 쫓아가서 막대한 35억 달러를 지출하려는 Biden 씨의 추진에 동참할 것을 요구하면서 끓어올랐습니다. 계산서. 그녀는 그렇게 하지 않았고, 이로 인해 민주당원들은 그들의 비전을 극적으로 축소해야 했습니다. 그 달 말, 좌익 시위자들은 그녀가 주례하던 결혼식장 밖에 몰려들었습니다. 그들은 "Sinema에 대한 수치심"과 "그가 패배하도록 투표하십시오"라고 외치면서 "REPRESENTATION NOT PROSTITUTION", "Sinema는 민주당을 배반합니다", "Kry$sten $inema i$ a Corporate $chill"이라는 팻말을 내걸었습니다. "나는 그들이 적절한 전술이라고 생각하지 않지만 그것은 모두에게 일어난다"고 Biden 씨는 당시 "과정의 일부"라고 언급하면서 말했습니다. Sinema 씨의 접근 방식은 민주당원들을 격분시켰지만 애리조나에서 배리 골드워터(Barry Goldwater) 상원의원과 존 매케인(John McCain) 상원의원과 같은 옷을 입은 독립 배우로서의 그녀의 이미지를 굳혔습니다. 기반을 둔 여론 조사원인 마이크 노블은 "그녀는 역사상 처음으로 민주당과 공화당의 깃발을 날리지 않은 애리조나 상원의원"이라고 말했다. "시네마의 역사적이고 대담한 움직임입니다." 노블 씨는 “시네마의 정치적 움직임은 논쟁의 여지가 있는 일부 투표 이후 민주당원들 사이에서 그녀의 여론 조사가 좋지 않았고 민주당 경선 도전에 취약하기 때문에 이치에 맞습니다.”라고 말했습니다. "독립당원으로서 그녀는 정당 예비선거에서 정치적 위험을 감수하고 총선만 걱정하면 됩니다." 민주당은 상원과 그 위원회를 통제할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 표를 보유하겠지만, 시네마 씨의 결정은 당내 권력 역학을 바꾸고 금요일에 큰 폭으로 하락하면서 백악관의 반응을 불러일으켰습니다. 카린 진 백악관 대변인은 "애리조나에서 무소속으로 등록한 그녀의 결정이 상원의 새로운 민주당 다수당 지배력을 바꾸지 않는다는 것을 이해하고 있으며 우리가 그녀와 계속해서 성공적으로 일할 것이라고 기대할 모든 이유가 있다"고 말했다. Pierre는 Biden 씨의 주요 의제에 대한 Ms. Sinema의 지원을 가리키며 말했습니다.