Visit Blog

Explore Tumblr blogs with no restrictions, modern design and the best experience.

Fun Fact

Tumblr receives over 17 Billion pages views a month.

Trending Blogs
#review

Papercrane B5 Notebook (I forgot the product code…)

Disclaimer: Not sponsored.

image
image
image

Hello! This is another Papercrane Product!

It is a teal notebook and comes in a pack of 2 Lined Notebooks with Textured Paper covers.

It is fountain pen friendly as I am writing from a Lamy Safari with a Medium nib.

When I flip iver the page, there is no bleeding nor feathering.

At the bottom, I have also attempted writing with gel pen and ballpoint pen.

image
0 notes · See All

A little bit Christmas, a little bit kooky, and a whole lot steamy! 


Jingle Lady, Book 1 All My Jingle Ladies, by Melissa Williams 

November 12, 2020 

Contemporary Romance 


Amazon: https://amzn.to/3k8AWoe⁣

^^^

Brendan Effnert is a firefighter. A good one if he was honest. While on duty, Brendan valued the fact that he was focused and ready to do his job at a moment’s notice. Nothing fazed him. Nothing disturbed him during working hours. But the day Brendan walked into Libby’s house, he forgot what he was supposed to be doing.

Libby Haider is a bell ringer, Christmas lover, perpectuantly single and a little crazy about Christmas. It could be said Libby is a bit forgetful. So when she is practicing for the upcoming event featuring her bell ensemble group, All My Jingle Ladies, Libby did not realize her house was on fire. Until the blue-eyed firefighter dashes through the door.

A little holiday fun and laughter is needed and this fast-paced ride gives us that and more.  Cheers to Melissa Williams for a fine book!

I received this book as an advance review copy free. I have read and reviewed this book voluntarily.
–Brenda, JustViews

justviews
0 notes · See All

Books Read in 2020 #113- “Atlantic” By Simon Winchester . An ambitious attempt to write a biography of the Atlantic Ocean and man’s relationship with it. Covering, cultural, geographical, and environmental concerns Winchester does a great job of weaving together personal stories, and observations of his many Atlantic related travels with sound science, and historical context. Recommended for anyone whose ever looked down out of the plane window on a trans-Atlantic flight and wondered “What’s down there?”

image
0 notes · See All

Oh, thank you! Kind words and lovely feedback like yours mean so much to me, makes me so happy to hear that! 🥰💖

0 notes · See All
image

JIU JITSU (2020)


C'est quoi, ce truc ? L'improbable crossover fauché et bien sûr non officiel entre PREDATOR (1987) et on ne sait quoi de Dimitri Logothetis -le réalisateur responsable du plaisir nanardesque stupide mais coupable KICKBOXER RETALIATION (2018)- est là, avec un casting regroupant rien de moins que Tony Jaa -ONG-BAK (2003)-, Nicolas Cage -dont la carrière s'effrite à vue d'oeil-, et évidemment Alain Moussi -égal à lui-même-. Mêlant arts martiaux, cascades, faux raccords, répliques insensées, et scénario anémique, dur de croire que ce projet de science-fiction -si, si- tiré du comics éponyme -quelle originalité !- existe, improbable mais bien réel. Ah oui, Frank Grillo est là lui aussi. Et si l'on cite volontiers PREDATOR en parlant de ce film, c'est parce que l'antagoniste en costume de latex de JIU JITSU, le Spaceman, tente de représenter le légendaire Yautja chasseur à sa manière : guindé comme un Bioman, vous tremblerez à coup sûr d'effroi devant son casque dont la visière perpétuellement enfumée révèle parfois -trop souvent- sa vieille tête en CGI mal branlés, yeux rougeoyants et bouche dégueulasse à l'appui. Moche et nul donc, mais que serait JIU JITSU sans son Nicolas Cage déclamant à tout-va, se parant de son plus beau chapeau en papier journal lors d'un duel d'apprentissage au sabre -virevoltant sur un piano dans le sous-sol d'une jungle- pour hisser le héros à son statut d'élu ? Compilation semi-pro de cascades incessantes et de dialogues creux, JIU JITSU ose citer l'art martial en tant d'héritage venu du fin fond de la galaxie, legs du Spaceman venant tout les six ans jauger les humains de leur capacité combative en se frayant un passage via un portail apparaissant dans la Vallée des Temples : ça n'a aucun sens, tout comme l'interface du faux Predator, fabriqué de toutes pièces par un stagiaire peu cher payé pour réaliser le reste des effets spéciaux du long-métrage. Et la prophétie scandée par le vieux couple de pêcheurs du coin n’aidera en rien, EN RIEN j’vous dis ! Segmenté à l'image des chapitres de son matériau d'origine, l'aspect comic-book de JIU JITSU se résume à un générique d'introduction très laid, spoilant plusieurs scènes du film, ainsi qu'à des fondus de vignettes tout sauf icôniques tirées de l'œuvre. “Quoi ? POURQUOI ? COMMENT ?” seront les questions régulières qui assailleront votre pauvre esprit déjà essoré par l'accumulation de bêtises de la première demi-heure du long-métrage, si tant est que vous surviviez jusque-là. Incroyable pot-pourri nanti d'une production à la The Asylum, JIU JITSU est l'égal de cette comète qui survole les cieux et ne s'écrase hélas jamais. Rempli de fillers de bastonnade, mal joué, à la fois nanar et navet, ce DTV difforme et baveux ne pourra être ingéré qu'en VF, sa version originale trop sérieuse défiant l'insupportable -on se demande encore comment on a survécu- : reveals à la stupidité inouïe, bruitages impossibles, toutes les tares sont au rendez-vous pour faire de JIU JITSU un recyclage à tous les niveaux. Pas de charisme pour le groupe de combattants, ni pour la storyline de la trame, entrecoupée d’interventions foirées -le black rigolo-, et de décors naturels réutilisés à l’infini. Notre seul souhait ? Devenir amnésique comme James, ce héros qui devra contre son souhait assumer sa destinée à la con, entouré d’imbéciles : vieille resucée de MORTAL KOMBAT (1995) repompant PREDATOR sans vergogne, on réserve JIU JITSU aux vétérans du nanar ou aux beaufs qui achètent leur DTV convaincus qu’il s’agisse d’un blockbuster original. Mal aux yeux, mal au cul, mal partout : calamiteux et catastrophique, on en rit à peine… C’est quoi ce truc ?


CALAMITEUX /20

0 notes · See All

Anon agree this. age gap is not a problem in relationship if both are adults. The thing is some people have a student× teacher fantasy, there are novels/manga revolving around that subject so she’s not the first or the last person. Yeah it’s very concerning her underage character is shipped with an adult and kakashi would not be with a person who he met when she was 4/6 yrs old.


image

Originally posted by gameraboy1

0 notes · See All

I’m sorry for not going more in-depth, but I’m positive that finances aren’t the only thing awaiting you in that relationship. Thank you for your quick feedback, love! 💖

0 notes · See All

Happiest Season Review

Buckle up, it’s a long one. Here goes… 

While not a perfect film of course, it had its moments of being quite lovely. And it had its moments of being frustrating as hell. It had sweetness, a few decent laughs, angst, heart, and a wonderful happy ending. It was amazing to see an LGBTQ-themed film - a Christmas film no less - be something actually high quality, backed by a major studio, and starring recognizable names. 

That’s the easy part. Now comes the hard part. My thoughts on the current conflict amongst the LGBTQ community regarding the overall focus of the film, Harper, etc. 

Yes, it’s yet another tale based around the trauma of discovering oneself and coming out, and yes that’s frustrating for some people who want to see something else. I fully agree that other kinds of content is needed, desperately. So it’s more than okay to feel that way. Alas… 

Some people found it relatable or even inspiring and important and potentially helpful for them or their families, and that’s amazing. Like John said, not everyone has a simple time coming out. For some it’s terrifying, or even dangerous. And some people can never even come out at all. And imagine what an exhausting and lonely life that is for those who can’t. And thus imagine what a comfort and symbol of hope a movie like this can be for them. 

I think both perceptions are entirely valid, and if anything the intense disagreement over all of that just goes to show that more LGBTQ content is needed overall so that there is something for everybody. So that there are stories that address LGBTQ issues in order to help people empathize and relate - impacting both LGBTQs and hopefully the people around them into being more accepting - and stories where being LGBTQ isn’t even an issue nor addressed at all, where people simply exist and live and love as human beings without the drama always being tied to being LGBTQ. (I’m working on things like that, btw. Fingers crossed on bringing them to fruition.) 

As for how I feel about the characters… 

Jane is my favorite. She is amazing. She is hilarious. She deserves the world. End of story. 

Riley was dope. Yes, she and Abby had some interesting chemistry. And yes, Riley was in theory a potentially better option on paper than Harper. Alas, it wasn’t their story. I think that pairing being intriguing was a case more of actress chemistry than anything, but ultimately it was cool that this movie showed the various kinds of dynamics between LGBTQ people, in particular women. It was nice having a lesbian couple in the middle, with a gay man as a best friend to the lesbian (rather than the gay man/straight woman cliche) and two lesbians (Abby and Riley) being able to just be friends and confidants and it not become something else. It showed the spectrum of relationships amongst LGBTQs - and that more than one or a single pair exist in a circle of friends - and that was actually really refreshing and accurate.

Harper… sigh. Okay, yes, she wasn’t great for a lot of the film, but she was also going through something heartbreakingly tough. She handled it terribly and took it out on Abby in an overblown and heartless way for a couple days, which wasn’t okay at all. It was horrible. Alas, people are human and sometimes they can react badly. Really badly. As long as they realize, grow and make amends, that is what counts most. Also, people need to take into consideration that aside from her lie which was based entirely in paralyzing fear, she was apparently a kind, caring, and amazing partner prior to that. Even at the very start, we saw Harper repeatedly asking Abby “Are you okay? Are you having fun?” showing her to be considerate and making Abby’s needs and feelings a priority because she knew Abby struggled at Christmas and she wanted to help her experience something better and not just hide in her anti-Christmas hole forever. She wasn’t wanting to force her, she wanted to help her – alas ultimately it backfired given the conflict, but then also worked out after getting worse and now Abby can hopefully enjoy Christmas again with a new family. If Harper had always been selfish and problematic, this would be a very different conversation and I wouldn’t be taking this perspective at all.

Just remember, Abby even said later that she didn’t recognize Harper. And that’s because Harper reverted back. At first I was frustrated to see her, as a grown ass woman, go back and repeat her past HORRIBLE action against a girlfriend that she did in high school. Then I realized… how utterly sad is it that she was put in such a tough spot that she was triggered and reverted back to that scared, closeted teenager. Alas, in the end, she showed she did grow. She was willing to lay it all out there. And she chased after and repeatedly apologized to Abby. And we have to hope that from there, with that half lifetime of unbearable weight off of her, that she was never that selfish or hurtful again. Because the things she said to Abby weren’t even about Abby, they were about her. She felt suffocated by the situation and her family, and she deflected that and lashed out at poor Abby because that’s what we sadly do as humans – we hurt those we love the most, who are closest to us, because they’re “easy” targets. Again, not okay. Not okay at all. But it’s important to understand the psychology behind it, to see the goodness in her prior and otherwise, and especially the growth in the end. 

Harper, overall, is not perfect. Far from it. And as half of the leading romantic couple… yeah, it was hard to watch sometimes for that reason. But I think if you take a step back, it’s a somewhat accurate representation for someone in her position who reacts badly. She’s deeply flawed, but seems ultimately like someone who genuinely means well but tends to fuck up when pushed to her breaking point. And that’s… well, that’s human. 

What bothers me is that I have seen people go as far as calling Harper abusive, but I really wish people would stop tossing that term around so flippantly. Emotional/mental abuse is all about patterns of harmful behaviors demonstrated by someone in a relationship (romantic or otherwise) in order to exercise extended power and dominance over their victim. Pairings who are otherwise solid, who started off healthy, have mutual respect etc but have a blow up or issue where one or both says or does super hurtful things, but they recover, make amends and are stronger than ever? That is not an abusive relationship. That’s a situation where a pair hits a bump, they see the worst in each other (though this time it was admittedly one-sided since Harper was the one with the weight of being closeted on her) but come out stronger in the end. 

There’s a whole spectrum that ranges from: someone is just not great sometimes, to someone is hard to take all the time, to someone is toxic, to someone is abusive. But with fiction lately, especially within and surrounding the LGBTQ community, some viewers immediately label every single conflict, temporary issue, etc as “abuse” and “toxicity” without taking into consideration any of the surrounding events or previous (or following) characterization, and it can be extremely harmful to do so, as it diminishes real abuse. 

Harper is not an abuser. For all we know, she’s never lied to Abby about anything else except her family situation/being out. And yeah she was extremely selfish and unpleasant when she was cornered and terrified. And her actions were, for a couple days, very hurtful and in no way excusable. But understanding why someone does something isn’t the same as excusing it. It’s just called empathy. Abby deserved better in those moments. And yeah, maybe even overall. But for now, all anybody can do is take Harper’s evolution at face value since she and they were clearly fairly solid before, and just hope she’ll always treat Abby with nothing but love and respect for the rest of their lives, and in 20 years they look back and have a laugh about the whole thing and never have problems anywhere remotely that harmful again. 

All in all: at times frustrating, but ultimately solid little film. Never did it tell people it would present a perfect, infallible LGBTQ relationship so for anyone saying “this was bad representation”… just keep that in mind. 

Would it have been nice to have Harper be totally likable except for a bad moment or two when pressured? Sure. They probably should’ve shown more of them as a solid pair and Harper at her best before all of this to really get us on board with Harper before seeing her at her worst. You can tell they made that attempt in the opening, and perhaps that was something that should’ve been stretched out a tad more, structurally - while also peppering in more of “good Harper” in between the bad. Like her more openly and firmly defending Abby on the mall theft thing. Or Abby having a sad moment while watching the family and remembering her parents, and Harper comforting her through it. Instead, it was always John or Riley being there for Abby while Harper not only abandoned her but also kept being the one to hurt her, and it didn’t have to be like that. Definitely coulda been a tad more balanced to help the characterization of Harper as a good person in a bad spot reacting badly. 

Speaking of, from a writing perspective, one small but major change that would’ve helped on that front, was if they’d had her having always been honest with Abby that she wasn’t out with her family, and being roped into a Christmas with them, rather than lying about it and ambushing Abby at the last second. Or even having gone home with the intention of coming out to them with Abby by her side, then finding out about her dad’s political situation and panicking and they both decide together to fake it (maybe Abby even suggesting it or pulling the first lie to the family to protect a frozen Harper) until he lands the donor, which then leads to craziness. A small, simple change like this could’ve helped the reception of Harper tremendously with the audience and put them both on level playing field and in a sort of “they’re a team, it’s them vs the world/Harper’s family” situation, during which Harper could’ve still taken her bad turn and done hurtful things for dramatic plot purposes, alas the overall setup would’ve painted Harper in a less awful light from the get, and made Abby an active participant rather than someone who gets thrown to the wolves out of nowhere by Harper and just constantly takes unfair hit after hit after hit from every single direction, Harper included. 

Because while the audience saw Abby feeling hurt, being isolated, and even at times near tears… Harper really didn’t. For the most part she was too busy being stuck in her own trauma. Too busy trying to survive her own personal hell. So we saw poor Abby. We felt for poor Abby. And by the time Harper really noticed or realized what she was putting Abby through, it was all too far gone. I think another thing on this front that could’ve helped was focusing more on Harper’s struggle. We kinda needed that balance. Again, this was a writing and focus issue. We sat with Abby so much and saw her pain, but we didn’t sit with Harper as much. We saw her put in bad spots, certainly. But didn’t see her pain. We just saw how she was reacting to her pain and all her bad actions because of it – usually through the eyes of poor Abby whom it was hurting so deeply. We even had to find out how Harper was feeling from John, rather than from Harper herself. A solution for this could’ve been Harper talking to Jane, maybe even in sort of code or around the topic instead of outright. Something intimate where Harper asks about one of the characters in her novel who is hiding themselves and how scared they are. And them having a tender, heartbreaking, also somewhat humorous exchange that humanized Harper and her pain more.

Anyway, it had such a great cast. At times good messaging and a nice lesson here and there. For what it was meant to be, it was solid enough. I’m so glad some people loved or connected to it so much that they talk about watching it every year from now on. And for those who hated it or felt like it was poorly marketed as a feel good film when it had a lot of moments that felt like a beat down, especially mid-film, I completely understand. I hear you and in some ways I sorta agree… alas maybe just say you didn’t like it, or didn’t like Harper, and leave it at that because eviscerating it as “trash, miserable, etc” and labeling Harper and their entire relationship as “abusive” or “toxic as hell”, etc is potentially harmful and invalidating for people reading your words who maybe related to Harper’s worst moments and loved the story and found it portrayed their experience in an authentic way, or even better yet - gave them hope that one day they can come out and have their family accept them after some conflict the way Harper’s ultimately did, or that they can make mistakes and go through a tough time and bounce back and find love the way Harper did. 

Just keep in mind, no film is perfect. And with so little LGBTQ content out there, I’ve noticed that sometimes what content there is gets unfairly held to a nearly impossible standard, especially compared to everything else. You never want to make excuses for outright terrible messaging or horrible representation, especially when it’s written/created by cis hetero people who don’t understand the errors of their ways and need to be called out. But this was a film co-written and directed by a lesbian and starring a multiple LGBTQ actors from across the spectrum (Garber, Stewart, Levy, Plaza, etc). So, keep that in mind. And keep in mind that everybody’s experience is entirely different, and entirely valid

123 notes · See All

Dash & Lily (1:8 New Year’s Eve)

image

This is it. Our season finale. Lily (Midori Francis) is packing and getting ready to move to Fiji. Dash (Austin Abrams) is still searching for where things went wrong between them. When Mark (Patrick Vaill) gives him the red notebook in The Strand with a new note from Lily, Dash is very concerned. Lily is leaving the country in 9 hours and has completely lost her Christmas spirit! And it’s (more or less) his fault!

Dash tracks down Boomer (Dante Brown) at a Jonas Brothers concert with the rest of their friends. They sneak away to talk, and, after some advice from Nick Jonas, formulate a plan to give Lily her belief back. But will Lily see the notebook before leaving for Fiji? Will she even want to see Dash?

The music in this episode, and the whole season tbh, is banging. This episode showcases the most personal growth for Lily. I loved this whole season, and for the finale, I give it 5 stars.

0 notes · See All
Next Page