#lm insta covers | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

lennonandmaisyupdates · 5 months

Text

Lennon & Maisy Stella

↳ Instagram Covers | Buddy Holly - Everyday (Maisy Stella)

#maisy stella #nashville #lennon and maisy #love and music #instagram #updates #video #cover #buddy holly #everyday #lm insta covers #instagram story #nashville cmt #lennon & maisy

4 notes · View notes

klaineownsmysoul · 2 years

Note

It really speaks volumes.. all celebrities i follow not one post their babies pics face and definitely not a close up... I also follow JU occassionally and while she posts a lot of baby related stuff ( her experiences etc) she's careful to avoid her baby's face..

It really depends, to be honest. Lots of celebs do cover or deliberately aim the camera away from their kid's face or only show the back of their head and others seem to have no problem with sharing everything. I'm thinking of NPH and his kids as an example of the later. He and his husband have been posting full pics of their twins since they were babies. T/om Daley and DLB have only shared the back of their son's head and his little voice. But its consistent - that's the difference here. Even attention whore LM has kept her baby's face out of the spotlight. I don't follow JU religiously but I too check out her page sometimes and she's not only managed to keep her baby's face out of sight, but I don't think that she's even shared her name. And this is someone who's entire Insta account is one long ad. Like every post is either an ad for something or she's tagged a company who's sent her a gift as a thank you. Yes, the baby is in a lot of her posts, but its her feet or her back or she's in a stroller. Its her account; she can do whatever she wants with it and while I find the endless ads eye-rolling, I can at least respect the fact that she's protected her baby's privacy at a consistent clip.

The one big difference between JU, LM, and some of the others I've mentioned as well as other celebs? They have name recognition of their own to fall back on, so their entire existence isn't being the spouse or baby momma of a celeb. No one outside of D's fandom has any idea who MS is (why would they?) so literally all she has is being paraded out as his wife and now mother of his child. That's it. That's her entire existence. They've supposedly been together for over a decade and during that time, she's put no effort into having a career of her own and I think its pretty clear by now that she's not going to. Why bother when she gets plenty of attention and cooing accolades from fans for doing absolutely nothing? And now of course she's the coolest most devoted mother ever, as long as you don't count spending actual time with your infant as part of that. Its really funny to me to watch the reactions from her devoted stans: they carry on about respecting her privacy because they think the paps are just following her around wherever she goes and taking pics of her grocery shopping while preggo because no one's ever attempted something so brave before and those precious images shouldn't be shared online even though that was entirely the point of arranging the whole thing and then they scream at other people in their own fandom who shared those pics or pics of the baby that were publicly shared online by her own friends. The people sharing those pics are people who like her and buy the m/iarren fairy tale and yet they still jump all over them. You're getting mad at the wrong person. If you want to blame someone - and I don't quite understand why you're so mad since its not your fucking kid - blame the parent who shared the full image of her kid with someone and didn't ask them to either not post it publicly or to at least cover her face if you do. Its pretty simple. But they won't do that because as we all know, the little wifey can do no wrong and she would never in a million billion years use her kid to get attention for herself.

To be clear: its your kid, so I don't care what you do either way. You're the parent; its your choice how much or any of your kid gets shared with the world. I mean they had what 10, 11 months to have this conversation and agree on a plan? It shouldn't have been difficult as its kind of a yes or no question: yes we share or no we don't and that "no" goes for pics taken with other people or shared with other people on their SM. But like everything else m/iarren related, there's no consistency because I doubt a conversation ever happened. Her birth announcement was a full pic of her shared to D's account but we know he didn't post that one or caption it. Others shared from his SM do have her face covered but then you get the pics from M's private Insta sent to her friends' public accounts who then post to the world and he's cool with that? Makes no sense. Those pics from this baby party are still up on the Insta story they were pulled from and the originals do not have any of the babies hidden. There are quite a few shots of BB, including a full on shot of her with just the other babies, so clearly, her parents don't have a problem with this. If they did, they either would have been pulled entirely or edited and reposted. So if they don't care, its not my responsibility to be her guardian and there's no reason to go after people who share a public pic because you've designated yourself her online protector. I personally don't share them not because I feel any kind of fierce protectiveness over a baby I don't know but for the same reason I don't reblog pics of him with M.

All I'm looking for is a little consistency in this area but I'm not surprised that there hasn't been any when you look at the history of this epic love saga. None to be had at any point. Its ridiculous and embarrassing but I'd expect nothing less considering the character of the people involved.

#anonymous

11 notes · View notes

frankfukers · 2 years

Note

just now getting caught up after being away for like a month and theres So Much new content here. i love yall<3. but one reply to an ask just caught my eye and now i need to know what leather fetishist accounts frank follows. its driving me crazy that i cant find them

im so glad you like it here <3 im trying to keep this place going and keep the same kind of vibe christy had back when she ran it and i really hope im doing a good job for yall <3

and ya know what im gonna use this as a "frank iero freaky" masterpost so more under the cut (warnings for fake blood and violence)

okay so saying he "openly follows leather fetish accounts" is a comical exaggeration. But he does follow some accounts on insta that are just...weird. Like accounts that showcase gore, blood, other stuff. and i stg there used to be more suspicious stuff on there. maybe hes unfollowed it recently but trust me. i would not shit you.

like im pretty sure that is just frank being a "cool edgy dude" who likes gore and stuff but combined with Other things hes done like:

ik theres more examples from the leathermouth ap magazine shoot but i cannot find hq versions of them for the life of me so if anyone has them pls donate to the needy

LM is probably the worst of it thought heres the less freaky stuff:

that art on the young and doomed cover is a sensory deprivation mask which i Really hope i dont have to explain to people.

anyways i know most of this is probably frank just being a cool edgy boy but its...suspicious to say the least. also like no man asks his friends to tie him up, gag him, and cover him in fake blood then take pictures of it "for fun" so thats the frank iero freaky masterpost.

#frank iero freaky masterpost

15 notes · View notes

ofwildblossoms-archived-blog · 7 years

Photo

happy munday my lil children !!!! here’s me being hip as heckity heck with the grandpa glasses and lumberjack plaid. can we also talk about how i go from FIERCE in the first photo to adorable angel in the second one b/c same !!!

#( ooc. )#( mun. )#( i felt pretty today so naturally i've gotta post these pics EVERYWHERE. )#( i covered insta + aim + and vsco )#( my mom covered facebook lm a O )

6 notes · View notes

pilferingapples · 7 years

Note

A general theory

Okay, wow! Well I’ve been asked this before, so I’ve been thinking about it, but..this is gonna be long? So have a Cut:

I think there are a few basic things that go into making any adaptation of anything “ good” , and those things cover Les Mis adaptations too.

(this is all extremely up for debate, but right now, these are the things I would say matter! In some general order of importance.)

1- The adaptation has to be a complete, *good* story in itself. This doesn’t mean it has to contain the entire canon; for some things (like the Sherlock Holmes or Oz stories, say) that would be kind of impossible. But whatever part of the canon it takes as its base, it needs to make a complete, engaging , and self-sufficient tale. The existence of the canon in unadulterated form does not excuse the adaptation from the basic rules governing any sort of narrative endeavor. The original canon may be an excellent supplementary source,– but no one should *need* to know the original canon to follow the basic plot and character arcs of the adaptation. If this first requirement isn’t met, it doesn’t matter how great everything else might be; a bad story is a bad story.

2- An adaptation should accurately convey the basic themes and message of the story, or the part of the story, it adapts. If something is covering a complex story, there may be a whole lot of themes and plots! But there’s usually a few basic threads that honest analysis can agree are important. For Les Mis, someone might choose,say, Redemption and The Power of Love and Sacrifice to Create a Better Future; if an adaptation is only covering Valjean’s story, that might cover what they want to convey.

2b- An adaptation should never directly undermine the themes or messages of the original. Even if it makes for a good *story*, that’s just…it’s false advertising. Les Mis adaptations should never have Valjean behaving violently or abusively towards Cosette, or demonize the revolt or the French Revolution; or suggest that Fantine or Valjean deserved their suffering for breaking the social code, because that’s completely undermining the point of the whole friggin’ book. A LoTR adaptation shouldn’t make Frodo a super-powered Chosen One and have Middle Earth insta-heal from the effects of the war with Sauron, because again, tooootally missing the point.

I definitely think there is a point to works that reframe the story in a way that challenges or negates the core point of the original! Works like Wicked or any Changed-Perspective retelling can fall into this, and obviously they have a point! (I would even argue Disney’s (animated) Hunchback of Notre Dame does this, and very well.) But I don’t think those works can really be considered adaptations; if the theme, focus, narrative point and approach are all radically different, then you’ve got Something Else on your hands.

3. Bonus Round, But I think it’s important in its own way: The adaptation should add something unique to itself and its medium.

This might be the emotional impact of music, or the power of strong visuals, or voice acting that rounds out a character, or (in a novel adaptation) in-depth discussions of things a movie doesn’t have time to show. Just Existing In Another Medium isn’t it.This actually ties in with the first point, I think– if an adaptation is going to stand on its own as a well-made story, it needs to use the tools available to its own medium to do that! A film with terrible cinematography or a radio play with poor performances is just Bad, and being an adaptation doesn’t give it a pass for that (This is genuinely not a call out, the only radio drama of LM I know is pretty awesome, it’s just an example.).

You notice I don’t say anything about an adaptation needing to strictly follow every beat of canon, or keep all the original characters, or be set in the same time, etc. I think there’s actually a lot of room for play and invention in there! Dallas Theater’s Les Mis was a Modern American-ish setting, but it’s one of the best approaches to Les Mis I’ve seen. Basil Rathbone’s Sherlock Holmes movies are largely set in the 20th century, but they’re generally regarded as wonderful adaptations of the stories.

(This doesn’t mean a good adaptation can’t be compared to canon–it certainly can, and going over what’s been changed can highlight what made that adaptation Work! but a total 100-percent canon adherence isn’t really the key.)

Anyway, that’s my General Theory. All the Les Mis adaptations I consider Bad fail the first two tests severely –they miss the point, they’re incomprehensible, or both. The very best ones hit that last mark, and use the gifts of their medium to bring out aspects of the story that text can’t. But which ones those are will always be up for some debate!

…But not Les Mis Bedtime Stories. That will never be good.

#long post #Sorry Mobile Users D:#Adaptation Theory #i have seen so many Awful Adaptations #but also some AMAZING shows #so #Hey Nonny Nonny #(This request was about Adaptations and How They Work)#(Someone did not just ask me for A General Theory of Everything)

44 notes · View notes

thefandomfuckery · 4 years

Note

Did you watch LM on Live Lounge? They covered songs from people they've been associated with which was predictable and boring. Mixers claim LM is 'known' for harmonizing but their voices didn't sound good together. They literally rehearsed the morning of the performance because Jesy posted a video on her Insta about why she cried. Jesy having a panic attack took attention away from the performance.

I guess I should!

Falling - It wasn’t BAD but I had only listened to the song once from Harry before this and didn’t know the lyrics. P and Jade were trying so damn hard to be wispy and light in their singing that I couldn’t even make out the fucking lyrics. I’m not usually always about Leigh voice but she didn’t hold back on her part and it was strong the whole way through which makes her the best one here. P long note was actually not bad either, she weirdly still has that going for her. The harmonizing at the beginning was pretty fucking retched but the one at 3:05 which sounds mostly Leigh and Jade actually in sync. The one Jesy part was okay, she didn’t crack or try to strain her voice like she tries on these kind of songs. P carries most the song melody and aside from her part at the top she actually does a good job. Anyways yeah it’s fine but I don’t really get an emotional drive from them singing it. It feels like “heres a song we can all sing the entire arrangement lets go!”

I listened to H sing it live and on the track real quick. There’s not a lot of finesse with the vocals on the track but there really is power there. It feels much more like a song that’s suppose to be soft rage rather then the ballad Whitney Huston cover LM tried to make it into. It has punches but the dower sadness off the chorus hurts to hear cause it’s emotionally vulnerable. The live kinda confirms it. (Honestly the song could’ve worked as a Dancing with a Stranger with a female or secondary vocalist)

Holiday - I don’t really have anything to say other then, them trying to slow sing this song and do a cover of this is just boring. Their vocals are fine. It’s just not a song that is fun this way and trying to build up this one single seems very, short sighted.

0 notes

lennonandmaisyupdates · 1 year

Text