every so often when i do pokemon art a certain fic writer whose username i recognize sees it and it feels like getting shot at because i literally read their fics when i was like. 11. im 20 now. i feel honored yet seen in a way i cant explain. like i never thought we could interact normally cause as a kid who lurked on the internet their works felt like a gift and they were an untouchable hero of sorts. its like santa. i just interacted with santa claus.
15 notes
·
View notes
yeah i also think that a lot of people treated the characthers as the ccs, the c!dteam being the more obvious example. And it's not wrong but seeing people claming that's the canon and not just a interpretation it's kinda annoying. Like Tag your fics as oc and admit it's Your version not very loyal to canon, it's not bad, it's okay. For me the only problema always was the people who does want to be loyal to canon but on purpose pushed things that are very far from it
tbh i feel like i didn't see too much c!dteam in fanworks 🤷 and in all fairness to that one, c!dteam did have a group dynamic. if you look at the early smp specifically, that dynamic was actually...really close to the ccs. obviously that diverged later on but each member of the c!dteam had their storylines pretty inextricably linked to the c!dteam, in a way. not to say that there isn't mischaracterization for the c!dteam in fanon, bc there's plenty, but as opposed to...well, c!sbi as an example, at least c!dteam as a group actually existed in the lore
15 notes
·
View notes
no bigger pet peeve of mine than people who must continually point out how superior they are because they do not ‘fall’ for branded pair marketing alskdjffjdjsjsjddhdj congrats on your moral superiority for being the ONLY person who’s ever realized that branded pairs are fake 😂😂
You serve the same function in my life as every homophobe I’ve met in my last decade in fandom who clutched their pearls at RPF shipping and made fandom hostile because their idols could never be gay
…would you like a cookie?
10 notes
·
View notes
scary that there's still Will bowlcut haters around. like... that's his core character design, it looks nice too. sorry to all the different hairstyle enjoyers out there but Will without a bowlcut simply wouldn't be Will to me. that's the side effect of them doubling down on that one single hairstyle for 8 years. they can style it different or make it messier sure, but he needs Some version of a bowlcut otherwise who is that
9 notes
·
View notes
Suddenly and forcibly reminded of the time in sixth grade when I got it into my head that starting a UFO/Paranormal club would be a great way to make friends.
(Narrator voice: It was not. It was not a great way to make friends.)
8 notes
·
View notes
me: so we're all aware of sexyman ammon flexing on top of his pile of 40 severed bandit arms, but what we need to be talking about is the joseph smith sphinx, which is not just a prop in cult classic movie "plan10 from outer space", but is a real piece in gilgal sculpture garden, carved with innovative oxyacetylene torch te- huh i wonder what my nonmormon followers think of this
my exmormon followers: honestly you kinda lost us too
16 notes
·
View notes
it is interesting to me that ive seen lately (n yknow this is subjective and likely not any real social force just what ive seen) many queer people simultaneously talking about taking back and embodying unpalatable and ‘unmarketable’ queerness (the recent return to the terms faggot and transsexual come to mind) which i think is pretty evidently shaped by the conservative moment were in of demonizing queer ppl and especially gnc and trans people as predators--it reads as a return to queer isolationism in the face of external hostility, imo--while at the same time ive seen a lot of rallying around the “original” 6 stripe rainbow flag as opposed to any of the purportedly ‘factional’ flags of different queer identities, with the assumption being different identity flags divide us while the rainbow flag encompasses everyone and its kinda fascinating to me bc the rainbow flag is probably the single most marketable and palatable and uncontroversial symbols of queerness which has been seamlessly uptaken by those who wish to sell it back to us as gets pointed out every pride month with all the cringey pride merch....
i dunno you could maybe take that as a point of hypocrisy and claim the queer community is itself in a conservative moment rn where its returning to a sense of history and historical continuity (perhaps even out of that sense of external threat) or even that the queer community has for some time been in a conservative moment given the like, decade of identity discourse and lashing out at any people deemed to not have a sufficiently established history or however we should categorize the bihets/ace discourse/transtrender-tucute discourse/pan discourse/bi lesbians discourse (because lets be frank its essentially all the same discourse just keeping up its momentum by leapfroging from one target to the next) which i think is, like, SOMEWHAT true but not entirely?
its more interesting to me, in any case, as an expression of a conflict the queer community is facing given that current state of affairs RE antitransness and that very recent history. like, the simultaneous need to retreat to a safe sense of community which is welcoming to the very things the outer world is demonizing ie mutable gender, complex or contradictory experiences of gender, gender expression which is hostile to the cis binary, but also the ways in which it has to grapple with those discourses which have largely defined the community infighting for again the past decade. its queer people begging the question ‘how can we make the queer community welcoming to the girlfags and genderfucks and tboys who are being threatened when we have spent so much time making the queer community a hostile place for anyone with a non-conventional or not easily (or even just palatably) sortable sense of queer identity’. and the answer it seems to be grappling with at the moment is like, welcoming all that diversity of experience but being absolutely averse to naming it. yes we love all the fuckery with gender and sexuality never be marketable but like, ew, why are you calling yourself [insert microlabel here]. you can be genderweird but you cant call yourself genderweird. you can only exist as queer in the broadest possible way (the all-inclusive gay pride flag!) but if you try to name the specifics or use those identity labels weve been fighting over for years youre doing it wrong (the progress pride flag is now ugly and cringey and ‘too much’). i think theres something also to the way (at least on this site) transmisogynistic discourses have really taken hold as legitimate (though yknow i wont downplay how much a problem transmisogyny has like. always been in queer spaces no matter what) in the name of protecting n defending trans people. like its just regurgitated transmisogyny but its being mobilized supposedly in the service of helping trans people. idk its definitely getting a little late for me to string this together fully coherently but theres a throughline there, in the ways certain ideas are being consolidated and reified as ‘yes were more progressive now!’ when i think theres definitely something to question there in terms of like...are we? are we actually? are we doing better by the people were trying to help or are we setting strict standards and forcing ppl to adhere to them again?
21 notes
·
View notes
so glad easter weekend is fucking over so i dont have to see everyone xtianity posting until maybe december. fuck off i don't know bible holidays
3 notes
·
View notes
it's funny how when you'll give actual explanations as to why people are racist or transphobic or something similar, like how that happens and why it's happening now out of all times, that go beyond "white people/cishet people evil" so many people will instantly attack you for "apologia"
I think it kinda comes from this idea that identity politics has pushed that people of the unmarked categories like male white and cishet can't possibly struggle with things in life. but economic crises, which we have been in for 16 years now, affect everyone that's not part of the ruling class. prolonged economic instability alienates people from the status quo, from established parties, rhetoric and such. they begin to look elsewhere for solutions. the powers that be know to counteract this with reactionary politics. using scapegoating they'll promise the return to an (often imaginary) better yesterday, the very definition of reactionary politics.
these ideas sound plausible and actionable. things used to be better after all. those scapegoats used to not be there (as visibly) after all.
the way of solving this isn't to go "waaahh people are evil and fascism is back, woe is me" but to a) point out that these reactionary politics are not going to solve the problem because they are not the cause b) point out the actual cause of the problem (capitalism) c) offer actual alternatives (organizing, strikes, expropriating the bourgeoisie, and eventually total labor democracy)
2 notes
·
View notes
why do culturally christian americans think it's okay to rewrite the mythology of cultures that have nothing to do with them to make them fit their ideals
21 notes
·
View notes
So apparently that weird y2k overlay thingy is a thing Tumblr actually did. Genuinely thought I hallucinated it last night but I am apparently more mentally stable than I thought it's just the Tumblr developers who went off the deep end.
7 notes
·
View notes
added ur commentary to the post hope u don’t mind!! was nice to learn the real explanation behind it :)
yes, of course! not at all! i hope i didn't come off as too self-righteous or correct-y or anything. i learned cool things today too because i've only ever read FMA in English, so i didn't even realize automail was one of those types of words until i saw your post :D
2 notes
·
View notes
the amount of people going “wait din’s his last name” when no it still very clearly comes first is wild to me. family name. the phrase you are looking for is family name.
2 notes
·
View notes
Awesome when my brother starts talking at me but walking away while he does it and mumbling and then somehow is confused when I don’t know what the fuck he’s saying and is like “? Why is that my fault?”
7 notes
·
View notes
While talking to other rlmblr bloggers I realised I like RLM videos much much less but for some reason I’m the “bigger fan” (for lack of some better way to describe this phenomenon) because I have encyclopedic knowledge of the canon of all their dumb movies and shows.
6 notes
·
View notes
Ok so I just got a TikTok and I’ve got some ~observations~. One is that someone will post a video like “you aren’t X identity Y is *not* valid ever how dare you think you have any right… etc etc” and then a full %20 of the comments will be like “ONG I was so sacred until I remembered I literally am X identity!”. And like… I don’t know why but that’s the biggest tip-off of some kind of weird gatekeeping going on. Like something’s not right here if even the people you’re trying to defend feel attached by what your saying.
5 notes
·
View notes