I'm working on a peter x Achilles comic panel and this is what my brain came up with while going on auto pilot
ITS BASICALLY PETER HAVING LUNCH WITH ACHILLES THEN SLOWLY REALISZING THAT HE MIGHT BE INTO THIS AND GETTING CONCERNED, ITS SO FUNNY FOR NO REASON WHAT SO EVER SOMEONE KILL ME
ALSO WHY DID I MAKE PETER SO SHORT
6 notes
·
View notes
[Orson Scott Card typing]
Homosexuality is a sin. So anyways, the naked teen boy lathered himself up in the shower as the gang of other teen boys descended onto him in the shower....
5 notes
·
View notes
SHADOWS OF A LEGACY
Sixteen years after the defeat and fall of the Sith Eternal and First Order Nova Palpatine and Ben Solo, along with Jedi Rey and Finn, have began teaching the newest generation of force users.
Ender Solo, daughter of Nova and Ben, struggles to find herself and a balance between the light and dark side. With her two best friends Jace and Phee, they set out to learn their place in the galaxy. But they soon discover that the Force is so much bigger than any creed and philosophy that's been written in history books.
taglist; @aliverse, @jewishbarbies, @maddyperiez, @asirensrage, @oneirataxia-girl, @squirrelstone, @lucys-chen, @reysfinn, @fandomqueenlove, @mmmayflower2016, @bravelittleflower, @kiara-carrera, @susiesamurai, @witchofinterestt, @heresthefanfiction, @margoshansons, @zoyazenik, @dyhlanobrien, @eddiemunscns, @bisexualterror, @waterloou, @claryxjackson, @dreamerwithapen1, @foxesandmagic, @harleyquinnzelz, @anotherunreadblog, @kendelias, @phoebestarks, @anqelwiithhxrns, @the-multifandommess-blog, @bobfloydsbabe, @decennia, @enchanted--roses, @arrthurpendragon, @reyofluke-ocs, @endless-oc-creations, @curious-kittens-ocs, @faerieroyal, @daughter-of-melpomene, @starcrossedjedis, @seize-the-droid, @hiddenqveendom, @reggiepetersstan
14 notes
·
View notes
my friends referred to me as dark academia but a person and I don't know how to feel about it.
Anyways here's my thoughts on enders shadow so far and by that I mean basically nothing about the book and more about how Orson Scott Card can be what he is and still write stories of such compassion.
Orson Scott Card, for being the horrible person he is, is remarkably good at looking at a story from a different perspective, from a different lense and voice, to completely recontextualize a scene in a way that I really can't see a lot of other authors doing.
It really perplexes me that a person of this type of nature can be so judgemental and stubborn in their beliefs.
Now im no psychology major, nor have a lived long enough to consider my experience a proper case study but from what I saw from the people I met people of this nature are
1. incredibly rare, especially when it comes to subtlety and going against their own beliefs (or even just critiquing a slight part of their own beliefs)
2. incredibly kind and understanding, usually a bit aloof due to their way of always looking at an idea from the eyes of a million people. You can't really make a joke with them because they will take it as fact or see the sourness behind it, and they might be too understanding of horrible deeds and people, but at the end of the day they're kind.
Now of course exceptions to these kinda 'rules' always exists, if humans were black and white we wouldn't need to entire fields of study about it. But I find it so intriguing that osc wrote Ender as the exact person I mentioned before while seemingly not being like ender at all.
But the way he talks about his work and how he write about his loves makes me ponder at his nature for hours on end. When you read his introductions and how he came to write what he wrote he really seems to be absorbed by it. He said it gave him jealousy to not have him be the person writing enders shadow and the way he talks about his own work and ender really just seems like he's talking about himself, a constant reflection that's common among people of this nature.
Now im not saying he should be forgiven for his actions or that he didn't mean any of the horrible things he said, he meant every single word of it I'm sure. But I do also believe that he is a person of deep kindness, somewhere behind that twisted outlook of life I believe he thinks of himself as just and believes his words to be of compassion.
Or I'm assuming incorrectly, like I said I'm not qualified to psycho-analyze a person I've never met. He might have put nothing of his aiua into his writing, it might have been idea given to him by random chemical patterns in his body and he has no emotional connection to it beyond that. Who knows.
the answer is no one, or at least definitely not the writer himself.
And now that I look at what I wrote it really isn't that big of an assumption, of course he believes himself as being kind everyone tries to do that about something in their life (unless you're like me and assume everything you do is out of malice and if so I am so sorry) no the bigger mystery is how a person who can look at things from such distinct perspectives come to that conclusion.
I often wonder if the price to be a good artist is to be insane. Or inherently broken in some core human way, a giant contradiction.
I would pay the price to be a good artist, perhaps I maybe already have just without seeing the results of work. But it does make me afraid that I find myself so similar to a person like OSC, or similar to people who drove themselves mad or people who were killed or judged or punished for their ideas.
Maybe I only try and see the justification of the writers actions through his own mind because in some part of my heart I love the work to much to even mildly dislike the author. Because this world that was made inside this persons head is so beautiful it took away a piece of me and I feel unclean knowing that it was taken by someone who said some absolutely horrible, foul things.
Maybe I feel guilty of enjoying a story made by such a person
and maybe the person feels as guilty by writing it
6 notes
·
View notes