You might have heard that the Big Cat Public Safety Act was passed by Congress last week, and is on its way to be signed into law by the President. While I so not oppose with the main goals of the act (ending private ownership of big cats and public contact with them), I have had serious concerns about the impact of other aspects of it for a long time.
For years, I’ve been pointing out that vague language regarding exemptions in the bill could really negatively impact credible zoos and sanctuaries. The bill authors/sponsors clearly didn’t intend the bill to have that result, but because they weren’t more exact with their wording, the full impacts of the law won’t be clear until it’s fully implemented by the Department of the Interior. Since a different federal department oversees zoo and sanctuary regulation, it doesn’t make sense to assume that the Department of the Interior will automatically interpret the new law in a way that aligns with how the industry currently functions.
In the best case scenario, there’s nothing to worry about. In a worst case scenario, though, credible zoos and sanctuaries might find their operations, exhibit construction, and animal programs detrimentally impacted. If there’s any possibility of the latter occurring, there has to be attention on the process to try to ensure it doesn’t come to pass.
This article is my overview of some of the biggest possible problems that could come from a bad implementation of the Big Cat Public Safety act. It’s short (for me), sweet, and simple. Just because the law has been passed doesn’t mean the work has ended - now it just involves holding the federal government accountable for implementing the bill in a way that doesn’t cause harm to credible facilities and programs.
443 notes
·
View notes
talking to people about working at a library is so fun because I love informing others about their local resources (check and see if you can get an e-card on your local library system's website they often have a lot of awesome e-resources and you usually don't even have to go in-person to access them)
it is so fun until I get to the part about all the resources our libraries provide for people who are unhoused. Which I always end up doing because I work myself up into an excited ramble because I LOVE libraries.
[rant about people being prejudiced dicks about houselessness incoming, don't read more if it'll be a trigger or too upsetting]
And then 85% of the time this otherwise pleasant-seeming person opens their mouth and says some awful, ignorant, prejudiced bs about what it must be like "dealing" with "those people". Because all they know of houselessness is news report statistics and political victim-blaming and television dramas and glimpses of people they drive by on their way to work.
I barely know shit, I need to do much more reading and listening and learning, but just working in a place where people are allowed to settle and exist without their presence being considered 'loitering' helps me be a more empathetic person (I think). It also teaches me that I come from a very privileged position of never having worried about shelter or safety.
Because there's the studies and research and yada yada about people who live with houselessness and its effects but there's also just. Being around people who come from different backgrounds. Talking people through filling out frustrating online job applications. Asking people about their day and being able to help them with something seemingly small.
It's just people, man. At this point I don't know why I'm rambling but oh my god it's just people. We are all just people. Struggling with different burdens and understanding different truths. And
The city and the county and the state I live in are so blazingly hot. Terribly hot. A "people ending up in burn wards because they tripped and fell on asphalt" kind of hot. So with our resources the library system is able to do the bare minimum in the summer. Provide a safe, cool place during the day. Provide cold bottled water. Keeping some locations open as heat relief after hours.
I'll walk outside during the summer and run back 5 minutes later because the sun on my skin was so intense it hurt. My high school was multiple buildings on one site and kids would get heat stroke walking from algebra to history. Kids who had been living in this neighborhood for years.
People who don't have shelter from the sun show it on their skin, in their gait, in their voice. Whether because they work outside or don't feel safe staying at home or don't have anywhere to stay full stop.
So when people I'm rambling to express 'sympathy' for what it 'must be like' working where I work, it gets difficult not to shout at them.
I just want to point at the fucking door and say "Go stand outside for 30 minutes without sunscreen or shade and see if you can say that shit to my face when you come back in 10."
Usually I say a nice version of that instead, but the honest one is always the most tempting.
It isn't a hardship working at a place providing the bare minimum of support. It isn't a burden to be kind, or even just polite, to each patron. No one at my library is a hardship or a burden, except for the assholes (which are usually housed ppl btw) who try to be dicks.
2 notes
·
View notes
there will be those rare well-articulated posts explaining the glaring flaws/fallacies/misinformation/dangerous rhetoric in like 99% of people’s arguments against ai art and somehow people on here will respond to these posts and somehow still go “Wow, this post makes some good points! We should continue telling anyone who has ever even looked at an ai to kill themselves just because” like do they just pretend they read the posts and assume that they must be agreeing with them and proceed on that incorrect assumption?
I’ve really lost my patience for any of this stuff i think a lot of people are just either willfully ignorant and/or wanted an excuse to be incredibly rude to people without getting called out on it (this “person who just clearly is only arguing for the ‘good side’ of any given debate to flimsily justify being an openly extremely cruel person” is really something that i see all the time lately even in other contexts, really just unfortunately seems like a fixture of the internet at this point)
or they’re the guys literally lobbying for stricter copyright laws as if anyone except giant corporations would actually get anything “good” out of that. those too.
3 notes
·
View notes
And this brings me to the ‘privacy’ legislation. I’m not going to go over all the details, because it’s a complex bill with many moving parts. But conceptually what this law does is regulate the online advertising industry, not privacy writ large. And it does so by enlarging regulatory powers of the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, while tossing a bunch of vague terms at the advertising industry and limiting the ability of states to do much on their own. I don’t think this bill will ‘work,’ because it’s not clear to me that the authors of the bill know what they actually want, beyond establishing a Federal privacy bill because that’s what a large chattering class says needs to happen.
For instance, and this is the one substantive part I’ll highlight, the bill will basically allow Google and Amazon to corner the online advertising market. The legislation puts some restrictions on “targeted advertising,” but defines targeted advertising in way that does NOT include anyone with a direct relationship with a customer. That means Google, which everyone uses multiple times a day, and Amazon, which has direct relationships with 200 million+ Americans and millions of businesses, can continue their specific business models, with even less competition from firms that have to rely on third party data brokers. There’s nothing, as far as I can tell, that would protect the ‘privacy’ of third party businesses that must use dominant firms like Google or Amazon, and in doing so, have to hand over their private data to potential competitors. It would likely empower Apple to solidify its business model. There is, in other words, a reason big tech firms largely like this bill, (and have likely helped author it.)
7 notes
·
View notes