#journalisticintegrity
Note
There’s no color for “you’re like one of probably three gender critical spn butch dean kinnies on this sight who also has an obsession with stede bonnet that equals if not rivals mine” so I’ll go with raspberry probably
thank you 😭 and i would absolutely help you kill god any day 💙💙
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Unveiling the Hidden Truth: Who Truly Owns NewsBreak and the Perils of Foreign Media Ownership
In an era where information is power, the ownership of news outlets holds immense significance. Yet, behind the facade of seemingly domestic platforms like NewsBreak lies a web of international connections that raise serious concerns about journalistic integrity and national security.
Founded by Jeff Zheng in Delaware in 2015, Particle Media Inc., the parent company of NewsBreak, may seem like…
View On WordPress
#ChinaUSRelations#Democracy#ForeignInfluence#InformationSecurity#JournalismEthics#JournalisticIntegrity#MediaBias#MediaOwnership#MentalHealth#NationalSecurity#NegativeNews#NewsBreak#ParticleMediaInc#PressFreedom#Transparency
1 note
·
View note
Text
Analysis of: "Our Trump reporting upsets some readers, but there aren’t two sides to facts: Letter from the Editor" (cleveland.com, 30. March 2024)
Here is a summary of the key points from the discussion:
The document is an editorial/opinion piece written by the editor of Cleveland.com defending their Trump coverage.
It acknowledges criticims from pro-Trump readers but says the priority is reporting facts over validation.
Facts show Trump undermined elections and sparked an insurrection in an unprecedented attack on democracy.
Equating Trump and Biden is a "false equivalency" as Biden did not threaten institutions like Trump.
It compares those denying Trump facts to pre-WW2 propagandists enabling Hitler's rise.
Stakeholders impacted include readers on both sides, staff, the outlet's reputation and image.
The situation reflects challenges of objective reporting in a polarized climate with no consensus on facts.
The position advocates democratic ideals like fact-based journalism over partisan alignment or propaganda.
Insights expressed include prioritizing integrity over pleasing all; countering misinformation despite polarization; avoiding false equivalences; and lessons from history on threats to democracy.
Maintaining factual accuracy and accountability is seen as important even if it further divides or offends some part of the audience.
Genre
Based on its content and structure, this document appears to be an editorial or opinion piece written by the editor of the Cleveland.com news website. Some key evidence that points to it being an editorial/opinion piece:
It is presented as a "Letter from the Editor" which is a common way for editors to write opinion pieces sharing their views on issues.
The writing takes a clear point of view in defending the news outlet's coverage of Trump and arguing their priority is truth over validating all reader views. This subjective stance is typical of editorials.
It directly addresses criticism the editor has received from some readers, and tries to explain the rationale for their reporting approach on a controversial political figure. This makes it more of an opinion than objective news reporting.
Stylistically, it uses some elements of argumentation and analogy (comparing to Hitler's rise) to persuasively make its case, rather than just stating facts. This opinion-based style situates it as an editorial.
It runs under the Opinion section of the website, further indicating it expresses the editor's subjective view rather than neutral, objective journalism.
So in summary, the genre of this document would clearly be categorized as an editorial or opinion piece written by the news outlet's editor to the readership.
Summary
The editor has received emails from readers questioning why the news outlet treats Donald Trump differently than other politicians. Some say Trump's supporters are demeaned.
The editor acknowledges it's a difficult issue to address without offending readers who support Trump.
The editor says the news outlet's priority is reporting the truth, even if it offends some readers.
The facts show Trump undermined election faith with his false claims, and sparked the January 6th insurrection to overturn the election results. This was an unprecedented attack on US democracy.
The editor says they cannot pretend the facts surrounding Trump are unclear or that there are "two sides," as some claim.
Equating Trump and Biden is a "false equivalency" as Biden has not threatened democracy like Trump did.
The editor draws parallels between those who deny the truth about Trump and Hitler's rise, noting some denied truths to gain power, like those still denying Jan 6.
The news outlet will continue reporting truths about Trump despite offending some readers, as truth is their priority over making everyone feel validated.
Main stakeholders
Here are the main stakeholders affected by this editorial document and an evaluation of how they may be affected:
Readers who support Trump - The document directly acknowledges their criticism and likely seeks to further upset some with its explicit defense of the outlet's Trump coverage as fact-based. It may solidify their distrust.
Readers who don't support Trump - Likely validated to see the editor so strongly dismiss "both sides" arguments and pledge continued fact-based reporting on Trump's unprecedented anti-democratic acts. May boost their trust in the outlet.
Editorial staff - The editor is defending their editorial choices and policies to the readership at large. Seeks to justify practices and provide transparency to bolster credibility internally.
News outlet (Cleveland.com) - Takes a clear public stance that may further polarize some readers but arguably strengthens the brand by pledging commitment to truthful, non-partisan journalism over making every side feel heard.
Politicians who deny Jan. 6 truth - Implicitly criticizes their promotion of misinformation by comparing to pre-WWII propagandists. May damage relationship with those figures.
General public - Aims to model responsible, fact-based journalism during polarized times. Could influence public discourse if perspective spreads. But risks of further entrenching "both sides."
So in evaluating stakeholders, it both openly defends the outlet internally while potentially further dividing external audiences along partisan lines through its direct, strong defenses of coverage.
The situation
Here is an evaluation of the situation described in the document:
Political polarization in the U.S. is extremely high, particularly around Donald Trump. His claims of election fraud further divided the public.
As a news outlet, Cleveland.com is caught in this polarization. They are receiving criticism from both Trump supporters who want more flattering coverage, and opponents who feel they don't go far enough in countering misinformation.
The editor acknowledges this is a nuanced issue without a clear consensus view. Accommodating all perspectives risks validating factually incorrect claims.
Key facts about Trump's actions, such as sparking the insurrection on Jan. 6, are unambiguous according to the editor. However, some politicians and parts of the public deny these facts.
Attempting to portray all sides as equally valid on this issue would undermine the outlet's integrity and responsibility to truthful reporting. Clarity is needed on clear factual matters.
Yet taking a strong stance also risks further polarizing readers and damaging important relationships. Nuance is difficult amid intense partisanship.
The media landscape has become more partisan, making consensus on facts more elusive - a trend the editor implicitly warns could undermine democracy as it did in 1930s Germany.
Overall, this situation reflects the considerable challenges facing mainstream journalism in providing factual, principled coverage during a hyper-polarized political climate with no agreement on basic facts among the public. It is a complex issue without an easy or consensus-based solution.
Culture of enlightenment
Here is an evaluation of the situation described in the document in relation to the culture of enlightenment:
A key principle of the enlightenment is the pursuit of objective truth and facts over rhetoric, partisanship or appeals to emotion/authority. This aligns with the editor's focus on factual reporting.
Enlightenment thinkers believed the spread of reasoned debate and a free exchange of ideas would help societies progress. However, the polarization described makes consensus on facts difficult.
The editor draws on evidence and analogical reasoning (comparing to 1930s Germany) to make the case for their approach, reflecting an enlightenment emphasis on reasoned argument over unsupported assertions.
Defending an independent press committed to truth rather than serving political interests echoes enlightenment views on an uncensored flow of information.
However, the tribalism and "alternate facts" phenomenons described diverge from enlightenment ideals of a rational public assessment of ideas/information.
While aiming to uphold enlightenment principles of factual reporting, the situation suggests those principles are increasingly challenging to apply in some modern contexts.
Overall, the editor's position advocates for core enlightenment goals like truth, evidence-based reasoning and an uncensored press. However, the polarized social/media conditions depicted diverge significantly from enlightenment ideals of a well-informed, cohesive public assessment of ideas. It reflects both promise and limitations of those ideals in today's world.
Position of the ideas
Based on the ideas presented in the document, I would evaluate the position as being more democratic than autocratic:
Democratic elements:
Upholds commitment to factual, truthful reporting even when it offends some partisan views. Truth is a core democratic virtue.
Defends the outlet's independence and role in holding politicians accountable, rather than being a mouthpiece for any side.
Explicitly rejects false equivalencies that aim to portray all sides as equally valid when facts clearly show one side is misleading.
Draws a direct line between denying factual truths about threats to democracy and the rise of autocratic regimes.
Autocratic elements:
Could be seen as taking a partisan stance in strongly defending coverage of one controversial figure over others. However, focuses on factual reporting.
Does not adequately validate the views of readers who support Trump, but their views are not presented as factual.
Overall, the position comes down strongly on the side of factual journalism, accountability, and rejection of propaganda - core democratic virtues. While it may dissatisfy some partisan views, it defends an independent press rather than alignment with any political faction. So on balance, I would evaluate the position as leaning more democratic in its expressed ideals and priorities.
Wisdom / Insights
Here are some of the wisdom/insights expressed in the document:
Journalistic integrity requires commitment to factual truth over pleasing all readers/interests. While difficult, factual accuracy is paramount.
Extreme political polarization makes consensus on facts elusive, but media shouldn't abandon pursuit of verifiable truths or enable alternative facts.
False equivalencies between political opponents can undermine accountability and spread of misinformation if facts don't support an equivalence.
History shows how tolerance of propaganda enabled authoritarian regimes; media must counter false narratives that erode democratic institutions/processes.
Partisan interests may lead some to deny clear realities even if it damages credibility or democratic discourse long-term. Short-term gains take priority.
Nuanced discussions are hard to have amid intense polarization, but abandoning nuance for absolutism can further divide rather than reconcile differences.
Readers shouldn't blindly trust any authority, as even leaders can propagate misinformation to suit interests. Independent verification is important.
Overall, the document expresses wisdom in emphasizing factual accuracy and accountability in journalism even during polarized times. It acknowledges trade-offs but suggests the risks of embracing relativism or partisanship. Maintaining integrity and countering anti-democratic narratives deserves priority per the analysis. The lessons from history also provide validation and cautionary guidance.
#FactsMatter#JournalisticIntegrity#DemocracyOverPartisanship#NeverAgain#MediaBias#ElectionIntegrity#January6th#MAGA#BidenCrimeFamily#ChecksAndBalances#MediaLiteracy#PolarizationNation#accountability#Analysis
0 notes
Link
The recent hiring of Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), by NBC News has sparked controversy across media circles. Rachel Maddow, the renowned host on MSNBC, publicly criticized the decision, questioning its rationale and implications. In this comprehensive analysis, we delve into the intricacies of this contentious appointment and its broader implications for journalistic integrity and political discourse. The Backlash: Rachel Maddow's Rebuke During her primetime show on Monday evening, Rachel Maddow addressed the hiring of Ronna McDaniel as an on-air contributor by NBC News. Maddow's criticism was unequivocal, describing the decision as "inexplicable" and expressing hope for its reversal. This public rebuke underscores the significance of McDaniel's appointment within the media landscape, particularly given Maddow's influential position as MSNBC's leading figure. Professional Concerns Maddow's sentiments echoed those of numerous colleagues within NBC News and MSNBC, who have voiced apprehension and objection to McDaniel's inclusion as a contributor. Concerns center around McDaniel's history of undermining journalistic integrity and promoting anti-democratic narratives, raising questions about the ethical implications of her role within a reputable news organization. The Controversy Explained: Conflict of Interest Central to the controversy is the perceived conflict of interest inherent in McDaniel's appointment. As chairwoman of the RNC, McDaniel is deeply entrenched in partisan politics, raising concerns about her ability to provide impartial analysis and commentary. Critics argue that McDaniel's partisan affiliations undermine the credibility and integrity of NBC News, compromising its commitment to unbiased reporting and journalistic ethics. Impact on Editorial Integrity McDaniel's hiring has reignited debates surrounding editorial integrity and journalistic independence. By aligning with a prominent figure associated with efforts to delegitimize democratic processes, NBC News risks undermining its reputation as a trusted source of news and information. Maddow's condemnation reflects broader anxieties within the journalistic community regarding the erosion of ethical standards and the blurring of lines between news and partisan advocacy. Response and Repercussions: Internal Dissent The backlash against McDaniel's hiring extends beyond public criticism, with internal dissent brewing within NBC News and MSNBC. Notable figures, including former Meet the Press moderator Chuck Todd and Morning Joe hosts Joe Scarborough and Mike Brzezinski, have openly opposed McDaniel's inclusion as a contributor. Their objections underscore the internal divisions and ethical concerns within the network regarding McDaniel's role and its implications for journalistic integrity. Network Policy and Editorial Direction Maddow's assertion that McDaniel will not appear on MSNBC reflects the network's commitment to maintaining editorial autonomy and upholding journalistic standards. This decisive stance reaffirms MSNBC's dedication to journalistic integrity and aligns with its mission to provide viewers with accurate, impartial reporting. However, questions persist regarding NBC News' broader editorial direction and the impact of McDaniel's hiring on the network's reputation and credibility. FAQs: Q: Why is Rachel Maddow criticizing NBC's hiring of Ronna McDaniel? A: Rachel Maddow and other journalists are concerned about McDaniel's partisan affiliations and her potential impact on NBC News' editorial integrity. Q: How does McDaniel's role as RNC chairwoman affect her credibility as a news contributor? A: McDaniel's position within the RNC raises questions about her impartiality and ability to provide unbiased analysis, given her close ties to partisan politics. Q: What steps has NBC News taken in response to the backlash against McDaniel's hiring? A: NBC News has faced internal dissent and public criticism, prompting Rachel Maddow to assert that McDaniel will not appear on MSNBC, signaling the network's commitment to upholding journalistic standards.
#editorialstandards#journalisticintegrity#mediacontroversy#mediaethics#MSNBC#NBCNews#partisanaffiliations#politicalcommentary#RachelMaddow#RachelMaddowCriticizesNBCsRonna#RonnaMcDaniel
0 notes
Text
BBC Verify
Introduction: Accusations of fake news have become prevalent in today's media landscape, with even well-established organizations facing scrutiny. Recently, some voices have accused BBC Verify of being a peddler of misinformation. In this post, we will delve into the allegations and explore the credibility of such claims.
Background on BBC Verify:
BBC Verify is a platform designed to fact-check information and counter the spread of misinformation. As part of the BBC, it is held to high journalistic standards and aims to provide accurate and unbiased information to the public. However, like any organisation, it is not immune to criticism.
Claims of Fake News:
Critics argue that BBC Verify has, at times, misinterpreted or selectively presented information to fit a particular narrative. Accusations range from biased fact-checking to outright dissemination of false information. It is crucial to examine specific instances and context to better understand the validity of these claims.
Case Studies:
To substantiate allegations against BBC Verify, skeptics often point to specific cases where fact-checking outcomes were deemed questionable. However, it is essential to scrutinize these cases individually, considering the complexity of information and the challenges associated with fact-checking in real-time.
Analyzing Credibility:
While no organization is infallible, the BBC, including BBC Verify, maintains a reputation for journalistic integrity. They have editorial guidelines and a commitment to accuracy. It is vital to weigh any claims against the overall track record of the organization, considering the vast amount of information they handle daily.
Media Literacy and Critical Thinking:
In the age of information overload, media consumers play a crucial role in discerning fact from fiction. It is imperative for individuals to cultivate media literacy skills, cross-reference information, and approach news with a healthy dose of skepticism. BBC Verify, like any fact-checking platform, is a tool in the broader effort to combat misinformation.
Conclusion:
While accusations of BBC Verify peddling fake news may capture attention, a nuanced examination is necessary to gauge the credibility of such claims. It is crucial to differentiate between occasional errors or disagreements in interpretation and systematic dissemination of false information. In the broader context of media landscape challenges, promoting media literacy and critical thinking remains paramount for an informed society.
#BBCVerify#FakeNews#MediaCriticism#JournalisticIntegrity#FactChecking#MediaLiteracy#InformationVerification#NewsCredibility#CriticalThinking#MediaEthics#AccuracyMatters#NewsConsumption#BBCJournalism#InformationIntegrity#MediaTransparency#Misinformation#PublicTrust#FactCheckers#MediaAnalysis#NewsVerification#today on tumblr
0 notes
Note
Scream did you ever see the Bucky Barnes playlist that Sebastian Stan posted on his Instagram it was so bad I’m obsessed with it
I do not follow him so i haven't! Tell me about it what was on it
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
what if changing history had tumblr
eraserhead-official
eraserhead-official
My friend told me to make this account. I have no interest in this website otherwise.
eraserhead-official
why are my students on here.
eraserhead-official
there are “edits” of photos and videos of me. what is happening.
(6 notes)
hawksofficial
hawksofficial
i’m in a rivalry right now. no one talk to me
hawksofficial
intern says i shouldn’t say things like this on the official tumblr but i dont think she gets my whimsy and my joy
hawksofficial
we apologize for the previous messages, they are not official on any capacity and will be deleted shortly.
(3056 notes)
shadowedfangirl
shadowedfangirl
im having such a normal one rn
journalisticintegrity follow
you do realize that a villain you have connections to is on this very site, right? suspicious.
shadowedfangirl
dude ur gonna have to specify theres like four
#prev em. ahaha
(23 notes)
kingesplosionmurder
the-darkness-consumes-me
a weight has been lifted off of me knowing i am not the only one with a shadow quirk
kingexplosionmurder
of course only a loser extra like you would have a tumblr
todoroki-shoto
? why do you have a tumblr then
shadowedfangirl
yeah why do you have a tumblr. lol
kingexplosionmurder
SHUT UPPPPP YOU SUCK SO MUCH
#prev I LIKE MY BLOG TO BE ORGANIZED, YOURE JUST SAYING SHIT
(25 notes)
shadowedfangirl
the-darkness-consumes-me
a weight has been lifted off of me knowing i am not the only one with a shadow quirk
kingexplosionmurder
of course only a loser extra like you would have a tumblr
todoroki-shoto
? why do you have a tumblr then
shadowedfangirl
yeah why do you have a tumblr. lol
kingexplosionmurder
SHUT UPPPPP YOU SUCK SO MUCH
#prev you literally tagged this as reblogs. do you have a tagging system
(25 notes)
kingesplosionmurder
the-darkness-consumes-me
a weight has been lifted off of me knowing i am not the only one with a shadow quirk
kingexplosionmurder
of course only a loser extra like you would have a tumblr
todoroki-shoto
? why do you have a tumblr then
shadowedfangirl
yeah why do you have a tumblr. lol
kingexplosionmurder
SHUT UPPPPP YOU SUCK SO MUCH
#reblogs
(25 notes)
pikachuuuuuu
shadowedfangirl
im having such a normal one rn
journalisticintegrity follow
you do realize that a villain you have connections to is on this very site, right? suspicious.
shadowedfangirl
dude ur gonna have to specify theres like four
#FOUR????
(23 notes)
kendo1b
alien-queen
i need her carnally
alien-queen
who said that.
copycat22
so many people in 1a reblogged this…unbelievable. you’re all exposing yourselves to the masses
kendo1b
monoma you reblogged this like 34 times. you blew up everyones phones
(276 notes)
shadowedfangirl
shadowedfangirl
im having such a normal one rn
journalisticintegrity follow
you do realize that a villain you have connections to is on this very site, right? suspicious.
shadowedfangirl
dude ur gonna have to specify theres like four
(23 notes)
blooderotica
leagueoflegends002
did she fucking block me
blooderotica
LOSER!! she didn’t block me…i actually think she likes me better than u
blooderotica
wait a minute.
copycat22
alien-queen
i need her carnally
alien-queen
who said that.
copycat22
so many people in 1a reblogged this…unbelievable. you’re all exposing yourselves to the masses
(276 notes)
almightyfanboy
alien-queen
i need her carnally
alien-queen
who said that.
(276 notes)
uravity
alien-queen
i need her carnally
alien-queen
who said that.
(276 notes)
shadowedfangirl
“ohhhh y/n go to therapy youre keeping all your emotions to yourself and you can’t trust other people it’s not healthy” have you considered i need to Survive
shadowedfangirl
im very mentally well
(1 note)
blooderotica
leagueoflegends002
did she fucking block me
blooderotica
LOSER!! she didn’t block me…i actually think she likes me better than u
almightyfanboy
my first post on the tumblr!
#intro post #i dont know how to use this website…
(2 notes)
tiredandhungry
you’ll never guess what i am today
shadowedfangirl
shinsou please
(12 notes)
pikachuuuuuu
alien-queen
i need her carnally
alien-queen
who said that.
(276 notes)
tiredandhungry
you’ll never guess what i am today
(12 notes)
hawksofficial
hawksofficial
i’m in a rivalry right now. no one talk to me
hawksofficial
intern says i shouldn’t say things like this on the official tumblr but i dont think she gets my whimsy and my joy
(3056 notes)
todoroki-shoto
todoroki-shoto
i think this place is neat.
shadowedfangirl
todorokiyourenotsupposedtoputyourfullnameontheinternet
todoroki-shoto
im not?
(11 notes)
shadowedfangirl
im having such a normal one rn
#constantly having a normal one
(23 notes)
obsidian-within
(205 notes)
49 notes
·
View notes
Text
Tagged by @gynoids-over-androids !! Thank you 🥰
Time: 16:02
Relationship status: Married as of 10/2022!
Favorite color: pastel pink, mint
Favorite food: SUSHI or a good steak
Song stuck in my head: Hit and Run by LOLO
Last thing I googled: wrath of Sabellian 😳 my favorite WoW fic lmao, I was sharing it with a friend
Something I want: a house 🙏 we ended up not being able to afford to buy but we're looking at renting. Just viewed one today that we loved
Dream trip: a food tour of a bunch of different countries. My favorite thing to do is eat honestly
Tagging: @hunter-0f-artemis @apple-pie-42 @tenderstatue @journalisticintegrity @misandristmoira @terfectly @lavenderfeminist
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
S Vijay Kumar: A Visionary Leader in Public Relations and Image Management
Board Member at PRS International Group of Companies:
As a Board Member at PRS International Group of Companies, Vijay Kumar emerged as a trailblazer, spearheading transformative campaigns that transcended conventional boundaries. His leadership was characterized by a rare combination of astute strategic thinking, unwavering dedication, and boundless creativity. With an indomitable spirit, he navigated through complex challenges, pioneering initiatives in reputation management, public health, global branding, social impact, public policy, sustainability, influencer engagement, digital communications, and crisis management.
Vijay Kumar’s approach was marked by ingenuity and foresight, as he meticulously crafted campaigns that resonated with diverse audiences across geographical and cultural landscapes. His ability to inspire and motivate teams fostered a culture of collaboration and innovation, propelling the organization to unprecedented heights of success. As a brand representative for a plethora of esteemed organizations including DHFL, Yamaha, Water Aid, UNFPA, and others, Vijay Kumar epitomized trust, credibility, and professionalism, cementing his legacy as a visionary leader in the industry.
Media Relations Officer at ICFAI National College:
Prior to his role at PRS International Group of Companies, Vijay Kumar served as a Media Relations Officer at ICFAI National College from August 2005 to June 2007. Here, his tenure was characterized by a relentless pursuit of excellence and a steadfast commitment to journalistic integrity. As a steward of media relations, he exhibited unparalleled prowess in navigating the intricacies of media landscapes, forging strategic partnerships, and conceptualizing impactful communication strategies.
Contributions to Central Chronicle:
Vijay Kumar’s formative years in journalism were marked by his tenure at Central Chronicle from February 2004 to July 2005. As a reporter and editor, he demonstrated an innate ability to unearth compelling narratives, shed light on pressing issues, and spark meaningful conversations. His incisive reporting on government policies, agriculture, rural development, and socioeconomic issues resonated deeply with readers, earning him widespread acclaim and recognition.
Recognition and Achievements:
Throughout his illustrious career, Vijay Kumar has been the recipient of numerous accolades and honors, attesting to his exemplary contributions to journalism and media relations. His nominations for the European Union Media Award and selection for the Media Fellowship Programme from FPA India serve as a testament to his exceptional talent and unwavering commitment to excellence.
Moreover, Vijay Kumar’s exclusive interviews with prominent personalities, successful handling of PR campaigns for celebrities, and numerous accolades from prestigious institutions underscore his unparalleled impact and influence within the industry. His ability to navigate through complex challenges with grace, poise, and professionalism has earned him the admiration and respect of peers, colleagues, and stakeholders alike.
S Vijay Kumar stands as a towering figure in the realm of media and communications, embodying the virtues of leadership, integrity, and innovation. His transformative contributions, unwavering commitment to excellence, and visionary leadership have left an indelible mark on the industry, inspiring generations of professionals to strive for greatness. As he continues to chart new frontiers and redefine paradigms, Vijay Kumar remains a beacon of inspiration and a testament to the enduring power of passion, perseverance, and purpose in shaping the future of media and communications.
#MediaLeadership
#VisionaryLeader
#JournalisticIntegrity
#MediaInnovation
#ExcellenceInMedia
#Trailblazer
#MediaExpert
#PRSpecialist
#Professionalism
#TransformationalLeader
#MediaRelations
#JournalismExcellence
#EthicalCommunications
#AwardWinningJournalist
#MediaTrailblazer
0 notes
Photo
This seems like a good time to remind everyone that online misinformation has been a major part of the overall Russian strategy for years, and the more chaotic the war situation becomes, the harder it will be to find out what’s true and what’s not, so check your sources, don’t believe everything you read on social media, and try to get your information from credible news outlets that adhere to certain journalistic standards. #reminder #misinformationkills #misinformed #crediblesource #socialmediatips #journalisticintegrity #checkscources #warzone #ukraine #invasion (at Catalina Foothills, Arizona) https://www.instagram.com/p/CaaKAxeJJH3o7q1BMvTGR1eJBXtw7DOJ54-axc0/?utm_medium=tumblr
#reminder#misinformationkills#misinformed#crediblesource#socialmediatips#journalisticintegrity#checkscources#warzone#ukraine#invasion
1 note
·
View note
Photo
Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t recall a time, ever, when the #wellandcanal water was this blue. Doesn’t photoshopping affect #journalisticintegrity ??? I was always told to that effect.
3 notes
·
View notes
Photo
This person is awful. My mom used to watch her. She watched her again a week ago and was worried and upset for a few days. This program should have a warning. There are some people who believe it is showing actual news. It clearly is just opinions and extremely biased information. #media #msnbc #rachelmaddow #journalisticintegrity #news #lovenothate #accountability #responsibility #doyourjob #penmightierthanthesword #ratings #behuman #isitnecessary #isithelpful https://www.instagram.com/p/CTurc2klQXu/?utm_medium=tumblr
#media#msnbc#rachelmaddow#journalisticintegrity#news#lovenothate#accountability#responsibility#doyourjob#penmightierthanthesword#ratings#behuman#isitnecessary#isithelpful
0 notes
Text
New York Times Ex-Editor Defends Deceitful Kavanaugh story
Former executive editor Jill Abramson made an ignorant attempt at defending the New York Times blatantly dishonest Brett Kavanaugh story about alleged sexual misconduct.
Read the full article
#BrettKavanaugh#FoxNews#JillAbramson#journalisticintegrity#MeToo#NewYorkTimes#SexualMisconduct#Video
0 notes
Photo
Thank you to the 'thousands of hands' that have made this amazing feat possible. And thank you to the #navbharattimes for taking the time to come and see the situation for yourself and comparing it to your visit last year. #citizenaction #journalisticintegrity #sustainable #lakerevival #lakerejuvenation #lakecleanup #volunteers #savetheplanet #pernodricardindia #pernodricard #hkurbanwetlands #constructedwetland #natural #results #delhi #hauzkhas #india #sdg #swachhbharat #kartavya #philanthropy (at Hauz Khas Urban Wetlands) https://www.instagram.com/p/ByXUCPKHn5B/?igshid=1krgl0hwpt7vi
#navbharattimes#citizenaction#journalisticintegrity#sustainable#lakerevival#lakerejuvenation#lakecleanup#volunteers#savetheplanet#pernodricardindia#pernodricard#hkurbanwetlands#constructedwetland#natural#results#delhi#hauzkhas#india#sdg#swachhbharat#kartavya#philanthropy
0 notes
Link
The recent hiring of former Republican National Committee chair, Ronna McDaniel, as a political analyst at NBC News has stirred significant controversy within the media landscape. 'Morning Joe' hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, alongside other prominent figures, have voiced their concerns regarding McDaniel's appointment and its implications for journalistic integrity and balance in political coverage. In-depth Analysis: Morning Joe Hosts Express Discontent: Scarborough and Brzezinski's Reaction: The hosts express their dissatisfaction with McDaniel's hiring and emphasize the need for balanced representation in political commentary. Lack of Consultation: They highlight the absence of consultation with them regarding the hiring decision, indicating a breakdown in communication within the network. Criticism from Chuck Todd and Other Media Figures: Chuck Todd's Critique: Former Meet the Press moderator Chuck Todd criticizes NBC's decision, citing discomfort among journalists and the RNC's contentious relationship with the media. Professional Integrity Concerns: Todd underscores the discomfort stemming from past interactions with the RNC, suggesting potential conflicts of interest in McDaniel's role. NBC's Response and Editorial Control: Network's Editorial Policy: MSNBC president Rashida Jones reaffirms editorial autonomy for hosts, stating they are not obligated to feature McDaniel and can exercise discretion in booking decisions. Potential Implications: The network's response raises questions about the extent of editorial independence and the balance between journalistic integrity and corporate interests. McDaniel's Past and Media Criticism: McDaniel's History: As former RNC chair, McDaniel has a history of criticizing the media, including NBC News and MSNBC, raising concerns about impartiality and journalistic ethics. Public Reaction: McDaniel's past comments have resurfaced in light of her appointment, prompting scrutiny and debate within journalistic circles. Future Implications and Reconsideration: Calls for Reevaluation: Scarborough, Brzezinski, and other media personalities advocate for NBC to reconsider McDaniel's hiring, stressing the importance of upholding journalistic standards and principles. Impact on Election Coverage: The controversy surrounding McDaniel's appointment underscores broader concerns about media credibility and the role of partisan voices in shaping public discourse. FAQs: Q: Why are Morning Joe hosts opposed to Ronna McDaniel's hiring? A: Scarborough and Brzezinski object to McDaniel's appointment due to her past involvement in questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 Election and concerns about her impartiality as a political analyst. Q: How does NBC News respond to criticism regarding McDaniel's hiring? A: MSNBC president Rashida Jones assures hosts of their editorial control but acknowledges the controversy, indicating that McDaniel's appearances are subject to discretion. Q: What are the broader implications of this controversy? A: The debate surrounding McDaniel's hiring raises questions about media objectivity, corporate influence, and the balance between partisan representation and journalistic integrity.
#MorningJoeHostsandMediaFigures#ChuckTodd#corporateinterests#editorialcontrol#electioncoverage#journalisticethics#journalisticintegrity#mediacriticism#MorningJoe#MSNBC#NBCNews#politicalcommentary#RNC#RonnaMcDaniel
0 notes
Note
He really said gender isn’t real sexuality is based on sex Cas has a d*ck also Dean is straight like. Is he just typing words,,,,,,,,,,
NOTHING he says is lining up with ANYTHING else he says and it hilarious. this is literally just some rando guy saying words on the internet and we’re all losing it. we are so desperate for content.
7 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
zealouspeachcycle
ZealousPeach
joujin-blogs
Untitled
joujin-blogs
Untitled
ottogatto
Ottogatto
solarrebate-blog
Solar Panel Rebate