Tumgik
#rgu month 2020
yuramoonbow · 3 years
Photo
Tumblr media
for #RGUMonth2020 on twt guilt
and I hear my heart breaking tonight
2K notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
105 notes · View notes
pumpkaaboo · 3 years
Text
Day 7: Anger/Misunderstandings
Ao3 link: https://archiveofourown.org/works/27339046/chapters/67097392
Warning: This chapter contains a brief description of a panic attack.
Anthy Himemiya does not want to go to Nanami Kiryuu's party. She tells Utena as much, even throwing in her fear of crowds. Utena, of course, does not listen. Utena wants to be a prince. Utena wants to save her. Utena wants her to make friends.
Were she not the Rose Bride, not beholden to her Duelist's will, Anthy would have laughed. Friends? With her, the heartless doll? The Rose Bride, who must be whatever the current champion wants? The traitor, the bait for her brother's trap? She cannot have friends, she'd have to be a person first.
...Chuchu is her friend. But she created him. So he hardly counts.
Still, she goes along with it. Utena is the champion, after all. Anthy will do whatever it takes to keep her in the dueling game, because that is her duty.
She would have found it amusing, how Utena seemed to genuinely think she was helping her, but right now? Wearing a fragile green dress that seemed all too similar to the red one from oh so long ago, facing a crowd of students, soon to be abandoned to them?
Anthy couldn't quite find it in her to be mirthful, even in the most bitter of ways.
She's not surprised when Utena is pulled away from her by the red-haired would-be prince (though there is a twinge, somewhere deep within her chest, that she tries to convince herself is a sword).
She's not surprised when Nanami leaves her in the middle of the crowd (their faces blur together and her heart is pounding and she wants so badly to be asleep in her coffin, not dreaming of this).
She's not surprised when the boy sprays champagne all over her (everyone is staring, she can hear their phantom voices calling for her blood, she doesn't want to be here).
She's not surprised when the dress itself dissolves, when she sinks to her knees, made vulnerable in front of everyone here (the swords are coming, she can't do this again, I can't DO this again, I CAN'T DO THIS AGAIN, NOT WITHOUT YOU-).
She is surprised when there is a crash from somewhere behind her, and she turns around and Utena is standing there in her dueling outfit (how did she get that...?). "Miss Utena..." help me get me out of here you're the champion you want to be a prince you never will but you try to save princesses that's what you're supposed to DO-
Utena smiles, in her oblivious, insufferable way. "Let's dance, Himemiya," she says, and rips the nearest tablecloth out from under the flowers and glasses set on top of it, heedless of the destruction she'd caused. She wraps it around Anthy's body as a makeshift dress, and holds her hand for a dance.
Anthy smothers her disappointment and anger deep within her (where she keeps all the swords), and puts on a blank smile.
She is the Rose Bride, after all.
She must be whatever the champion wants.
9 notes · View notes
radioelly · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
revolutionary pearl utena
11 notes · View notes
juliaprecourt · 3 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Quick comic for  RGU Month 2020 “Reunion”
102 notes · View notes
rkalert · 4 years
Text
RGU UG / PG Exam Routine 2020 Rajiv Gandhi University BA, BSc, BCom, BCA, B.Ed, BBA, MA, MSc, MCom 2nd, 4th, 6th Sem Exam Date Sheet April/ May
RGU UG / PG Exam Routine 2020 Rajiv Gandhi University BA, BSc, BCom, BCA, B.Ed, BBA, MA, MSc, MCom 2nd, 4th, 6th Sem Exam Date Sheet April/ May
RGU Exam Routine 2020 Rajiv Gandhi University UG/ PG Exam Routine / Date Sheet Pdf 2020 @rgu.ac.in [April/May/June]- Students are you Searching RGU UG Exam Routine & RGU PG Exam Routine 2020Exam Held on April/ May Month 2020. So You Land on a right Palace. RGU Exam Routine 2020 Pdf Will Declare by Rajiv Gandhi University in the Month of Feb 2020. Students Who are Reading in RGU UG & PG Courses…
View On WordPress
0 notes
maxwellyjordan · 5 years
Text
Wednesday round-up
Ronald Mann has this blog’s argument analysis in Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, in which the justices considered yesterday whether the “on sale” bar to the patentability of an invention is triggered by a sale in which the purchaser is required to keep the details of the invention confidential. At Law360 (subscription required), Matthew Butman reports that the justices “wrestled with the idea that the America Invents Act may have narrowed the on-sale bar in patent cases, while leaving open the door for a possible exception to the bar for activities that aren’t commercial sales.”
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that Monday’s order in Fleck v. Wetch, requiring a lower court to reconsider a challenge to North Dakota’s mandatory bar dues in light of last term’s decision in Janus v. AFSCME, which held that public employees who don’t belong to a union can’t be required to pay fees to fund the union’s collective-bargaining activities, suggests that “the court’s majority now doubts the constitutionality of requiring lawyers to support a private bar association.” Commentary on the ruling comes from Deborah LaFetra in an op-ed at the Daily Journal.
Briefly:
At CNBC, Tucker Higgins writes that President George H.W. Bush, “who died Friday at 94, may have left his most enduring legacy on the Supreme Court, where he nominated two justices and paved the way for two more.”
As Ronald Mann recounts for this blog, the justices yesterday called for additional briefing in Carpenter v. Murphy, a capital case in which the justices are considering whether Congress has disestablished the boundaries of an Indian reservation in Oklahoma, affecting the state’s ability to prosecute crimes in the affected area.
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston reports that, “[a]rguing that a state should not have to re-draw its congressional districts twice in a short time span, Maryland officials asked the Supreme Court on Monday to rule that the existing map can be used again in 2020 despite a lower court ruling that it is an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.”
Mark Sherman reports for AP that “[w]hen you sit through almost all the Supreme Court arguments in a week, a month or even a term (as The Associated Press does), you hear the same phrases over and over,” and that “[s]ome justices have a sort of verbal signature, phrases they employ to disagree — more or less politely — with a lawyer arguing in front of them.”
At E&E News, Ellen Gilmer reports that “[t]he Supreme Court has signaled its interest in a potentially game-changing debate over the scope of the Clean Water Act” by asking the solicitor general to provide the government’s views in two cases that raise the question of “whether the law applies to pollutants that travel through groundwater before reaching surface water.”
At Law.com, Marcia Coyle looks into whether there is “a right way or a wrong way for an advocate to tell a U.S. Supreme Court justice that he or she is wrong during oral arguments.”
The American Constitution Society has published the second edition of its Supreme Court Review, which “features a series of critical essays, penned by the nation’s top legal scholars and practitioners, on the most important cases and themes from the Supreme Court’s October 2017 Term.”
The Buckeye Institute announces that it has “filed the first significant First Amendment labor-law challenge in the Supreme Court of the United States since the landmark June 27 decision in Janus v. AFSCME[:] The case, Uradnik v. Inter Faculty Organization, calls for an immediate end to laws that force public-sector employees to accept a union’s exclusive representation.”
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Luke Wake and others urge the justices to review Colony Cove v. City of Carson, a regulatory-takings case, and to hold that “[i]n the context of a temporary takings claim, … the analysis must focus on the economic impact of the restriction during the imposition rather than on the value remaining after a temporary restriction is lifted.”
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “examines the 2017 term [Supreme Court] case pipelines to see how partisanship helps us predict how judges vote in complex cases.” 
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up.  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast, or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!
The post Wednesday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
from Law http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/12/wednesday-round-up-451/ via http://www.rssmix.com/
0 notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
“You’re not special for winning a game with someone you know was never playing” -Penelope Scott
🕯 Click for better quality 🕯
72 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
Nanami deserved better
42 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
🌹 Click for better quality 🌹
24 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
“I don’t want to look at the real stars”
⭐️ Click for better quality ⭐️
23 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
Sun, Moon, Earth, & Sky
21 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
🐩 Click for better quality 🐩
17 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
But don’t you get lonely down there, Persephone?
💀 Click for better quality 💀
16 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
⭐️ Click for better quality ⭐️
14 notes · View notes
totally-normal-boy · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
The student council takes a trip to Paris on what they claim to be very important school business.
16 notes · View notes