Sorry guys, rant incoming. I considered deleting this but I put too much effort in.
"girlboss" "girl dinner" "girl math" "boy math" "gen z are making fun of us for wearing x" "here's how to dress like gen z:" "girlies" "girl's night" "boy's night" "me and the boys" "90s kid"
"I don't feel like an adult" "I'm 34 and I can tell you, I still don't feel like an adult either." "My parents seemed like real adults when they were my age." "I still feel like a teenager."
Maybe you'd feel more like an adult if you started calling yourself one. Maybe you'd feel more like an adult if you stopped trying to dress like a teenager. Maybe you should move your bed out from the wall and get a wallet. Maybe find a calendar app that works for you.
You are an adult. Even if you live with your parents. Even if you do part-time shift work at minimum wage. Even if you haven't graduated college. Even if you are single. These are adult things to do. Because you are doing them. And you are an adult. Start treating yourself like an adult. Fake it 'till you make it if you have to.
In other, writing-related, news:
That trend on TikTok of 20-40 something women authors (and writers yet to be published) promoting their books like,
"Omg! I can't believe I've sold X number of copies!! I never thought I would!" "Ahhhh imagine publishing your book and all your dreams come true and now you get to meet famous authors and work with big names in the industry!!" "Would you read a book where [proceeds to list a bunch of oversaturated tropes that tell me nothing about the actual plot]?"
It reeks of infantilization. If you didn't believe anyone would want to read your book, why should I? You made it on the NYT bestseller list! Stop acting like a mega-fan who got to meet a celebrity. You are their peer! "Would you read a book--" What if I wouldn't? Why does it matter to you what I think of your book? And for the love of god stop hiding behind tropes you know are already popular. "Here is my book: This is what it is about." Have some goddamn confidence.
It is fine to mention in passing "this idea was really far-fetched so I didn't know if it would appeal" or "I was struggling with self-esteem when I wrote this". It's fine to fan a little bit. It's fine to discuss the tropes in your book. But why are you building your brand as an author off of your inferiority complex? You are using your poor self-esteem as a marketing tactic to seem "humble" and "relatable" but it's coming across as unprofessional and desperate for reassurance. You are an adult. You are competent. The more you act like it the more you will believe it.
And of course, I haven't seen a man promote his book this way...
On another note, do any of the 20-40 something women writers who do "write with me" videos on TikTok actually enjoy writing or are they just doing it for the aesthetic?
They all have gorgeous minimalism writing spaces full of white and pink and a macbook beneath a window. Their makeup is done and they are conventionally pretty to start with. But their entire video is just them talking about how little progress they made, how many pages they deleted, how often they got distracted, how frustrated they are. And like, yeah. We all have those days. But what about the good lines you can't wait to share? The days when the words just flow? The cool stuff you learned while researching? Why don't you ever make videos about that?
Is this some other attempt to seem "relatable" by only talking about the "bad" side of writing? Because again, it's coming across as lacking confidence at best and, at worst, that you don't actually know how to write. And that is not the brand you want as an author.
Again, its always women. Why must women market their self-esteem issues in order to sell their art? Why must we be perpetually awestruck children (girlies, book girls) in over our heads?
25 notes
·
View notes
the obsession the beauty industry has with fixing shit is fucked up. there’s nothing to ‘fix’ about how someone naturally looks.
i’ve got this thing, keratosis pilaris, google tells me, often known as chicken skin, goosebumps, whatever. basically, tiny red bumps, all over. chances are you’ve probably seen it, i’m told it’s pretty common.
the thing about it is, it’s entirely cosmetic. i’ve no itchiness, or irritation, or other bullshit. just tiny, red bumps. all over.
the other thing is that i entirely don’t mind. i’m quite fond of them, actually. this is how i look. it’s how i’ve always looked. it’s me - why should that be an insecurity?
as a young kid, i remember my mom telling me, you know, your sister had that. you can get some stuff for that. fix it.
no thanks, i said, and in my head that was that.
my mom brought it up more, but i never budged. my mom shrugged it off, ‘it’ll come someday,’ she insisted, apparently counting on the outside world to do it’s job and shame me into being ashamed and insecure.
(i was a stubborn kid. i still am. recently, i off-handedly mentioned not wearing makeup (i never have) and my mother insisted, knowingly, ‘oh it’ll come someday’. don’t count on it, i insisted, as an adult in my 20′s, who’s had to listen to ‘oh, it’ll come someday’ for all of my teenage years for a whole matter of issues and is frankling tired of waiting. ‘oh well, i guess you can look nice without it anyway.’ yeah. thanks. should think so, that my natural face is nothing to be ashamed of. anyway)
i remember vividly p.e. class, a friend pointing to my bare arms, what’s that? being asked if it’s contagious (it’s not.), my best friend off-handedly mentioning, ‘oh yeah, you’ve got that thing’, in high school, a classmate curiously asking, ‘can’t you get something for that?’
and yeah, i’m still that stubborn, contrarian kid. and i’ve still got my little bumps. all over. and i still haven’t shaved. and i still haven’t covered my face. and i still haven’t conformed to a whole host of other bullshit we expect women to put up with, whatever issues we’re supposed to ‘fix’.
and i’m still happy with how i look. every part of it, even when i’m told i shouldn’t be. supposed ‘imperfections’ or not. maybe them especially, actually.
188 notes
·
View notes
yea we are never making progress ever the more people I talk to about unions and striking the more I keep hearing the same excuse of "they're selfish, they should just find another job if it's not paying them well/the conditions are bad" because last night my cousin called the people that work for national rail and other train services doing a walk off/striking are selfish for doing so and when I tried to explain to her that no act of striking the workplace is selfish when this is done to change the workplace for EVERYBODY not just those striking she started saying I'm doing too much over a "fake scenario" because she said would never strike when I wasn't even addressing that I felt like I was in a twitter arguement but in real life because at this point it's willful ignorance if you try to flip over the tables and say what I'm fighting for isn't even real when you just said people that strike are selfish....
22 notes
·
View notes
i have thoughts on the leaked photos from bath today
we've SEEN this dress before... (season 1 episode 2)
so i honestly think this can't be a flashback because nicola's makeup is too nice to be s1 penelope.
i think that this is penelope's first attempt at trying to change her look, and the reason why it looks bad is to show us that she's going to fail at her first attempts to find suitors because she was never confident in the ill fitted dresses portia made her wear.
i think that the poodle hair is not as "poodle-y" as s1 and you can tell because the curls are bigger.
obviously this is all speculation, but i would also like to point out to people worried about filming delays...
the "bridgerton-verse" is made up of a LOT of locations, many of which are not even near london. to film a scene episode by episode would take too much travel and too much time, so they film by location even if the scenes are out of order, so that they can use these areas and be done with them instead of repeatedly coming back. so yes, these images are most likely the first episode, but that does not mean they are extremely far behind. big productions like bridgerton use a lot of crew and to move everything around and film in order is near impossible.
obviously i could very well be wrong, but i thought i'd put my two cent in. i'm still a firm believer that they'll finish filming in february at the latest and we'll get season 3 around june/july.
143 notes
·
View notes
Fashion girlies are spineless, we know this.
But I find this insistence on trying to blend both faux activism and praise of the bigots and fascists in the industry of yesteryear aggravating.
If you spend more time waxing poetic about how Coco Chanel, John Galiano, or Karl Lagerfeld's work shaped the industry than you do detailing the various bigoted or outright fascist things said or did, what do you think your audience is going to come away with?
How do you not see that you're lowkey painting their actions as just flaws of an artistic genius and visionary?
Are the pretty shapes and colors more important to you than the human cost of their bigoted ideals? Really?
13 notes
·
View notes
I get tips at my job (laundromat wash/dry/fold service) which usually equate to over $40/wk for the 3 days I work.
Today, my boss came in and said he was going to start cashing out tips at 95% because he has to pay a fee on all credit card transactions.
I informed him that that's illegal, and also that with the total amount of tips processed per week he's paying less than $5 in fees on tips because Square charges a flat 2.6%, which I know because I own a Square reader.
He told me that he pays 4% for processing (blatant lie, I can verify it on the register itself in about 2 seconds) and "see what happens when you assume"
Then, he said he's going to just remove the ability to tip from all registers. Customers will now have to tip in cash, which none of them carry. According to him, it is simply to make things "fair" with his other locations since not all of them have tipping enabled on their registers (🙄).
Fuck me I guess.
10 notes
·
View notes