Tumgik
#Josephine nivison
Text
Tumblr media
Robert Henri - The Art Student (Miss Josephine Nivison), 1906
33 notes · View notes
rocklandhistoryblog · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
The new episode of Crossroads of Rockland History is streaming now! It is available on all major podcast platforms, or listen at the link below.
(Please note that a 30-minute version of this interview aired on Monday, November 21, 2022 at 9:30AM on WRCR Radio 1700AM.)
2022 marks the 140th birthday of Edward Hopper. On this episode, we learned about about the events celebrating this extraordinary artist, who was born in Nyack, NY.
Kathie Bennewitz, executive director of the Edward Hopper House, joined host Clare Sheridan to discuss the new exhibition at Hopper House, "Edward Hopper‘s Boyhood on the Hudson River and Emerging Artistic Vision," on view now through March 26, 2023; a new documentary about Hopper, "Hopper, An American Love Story" that was screened on November 16, 2022, at Rivertown Film; and the Whitney Museum’s new exhibition "Edward Hopper’s New York."
***
About our guest: Kathleen Motes Bennewitz, executive director of the Edward Hopper House, has extensive experience with Connecticut museums and nonprofits and has won several awards, including the Connecticut League of History Organizations Award of Merit in 2019 and 2020 and the Leadership in History Award, the most prestigious national award given by the American Association of State and Local History (AASLH), in 2017. She holds degrees in art history from Princeton University and the University of Delaware. After curatorial positions at the Amon Carter Museum and Frederick R. Weisman Art Museum at the University of Minnesota, and in education at the Minneapolis Institute of Art, she served as director of exhibitions and programs at the Greenwich Historical Society (the historic site of the Cos Cob art colony) and Fairfield Museum and History Center. She has curated exhibits on American art and artists over her career and in Connecticut at the Lockwood-Matthews Mansion Museum, Norwalk Historical Society, Westport Historical Society, Westport Library, and Westport Public Art Collections. She and her husband, Scott, have twin adult daughters.
About the Hopper House exhibition: Curated by Carole Perry and Kathleen Motes Bennewitz, with Lynne Z. Bassett, this new exhibition, on view through March 26, 2023, showcases childhood drawings by the artist on loan from the Whitney Museum of American Art and works from private collections, including the Arthayer R. Sanborn Hopper Collection Trust, alongside Hopper’s school notebooks and artmaking materials and artworks by family members from the Museum’s Sanborn-Hopper Family Archive. Together, these objects provide a glimpse into Hopper’s early years, the influence of his boyhood proximity to the busy waterfront and commercial district of his hometown, and insights into his life at home and his family’s support of his developing talent and ambitions. www.edwardhopperhouse.org/hopper-boyhood.html
About the documentary screening: Phil Grabsky’s new documentary, Hopper: An American Love Story, was released in October 2022 to coincide with the Whitney Museum of American Art’s exhibition Edward Hopper’s New York and the Edward Hopper House Museum’s Edward Hopper’s Hudson River Boyhood and Emerging Artistic Vision. The acclaimed film explores the enigmatic personality behind the brush, taking a deep look into Hopper’s art, his life, and his relationships, and prominently features Nyack in its opening chapter. exhibitiononscreen.com/films/hopper/
Whitney Museum Exhibition: whitney.org/exhibitions/edward-hopper-new-york
0 notes
toutpetitlaplanete · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Josephine Nivison Hopper - Church Towers, Gloucester, 1923
28 notes · View notes
artblg2000 · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Edward Hopper
Jo Painting
1936
Oil on canvas
80 notes · View notes
newyorkthegoldenage · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Edward Hopper, The Sheridan Theater, 1937. Oil on canvas.
This painting shows the voluptuous shell of glowing, orange-tinted space that is "The Sheridan Theater,” which depicts one of the Art Deco movie palaces that Hopper so loved to paint. The scene is inhabited by a lone woman who watches the screen standing at the back of the house, her chunky figure contradicting the flowing architecture.
A mouthwatering curiosity is what the viewer takes away from Edward Hopper’s painting “The Sheridan Theatre” (1937), the subject of a splendid little exhibition at the Newark Museum. The painting depicts a disquieting scene of a woman alone at the back of a movie theater, watched by two figures, one of them an usher. Is she waiting for friends, or has she simply arrived late? We don’t know, for her behavior doesn’t fit with any typical pattern of moviegoing.
     —Roberta Smith in the NY Times
The pleasures of this painting are numerous, from the ambiguity of the central figure to the stylized, evocative architecture and graceful shifts of lighting in the balcony. It is one of Hopper’s best movie-theater paintings. …
A cinéaste, Hopper once remarked to a friend: “When I don’t feel in the mood for painting I go to the movies for a week or more. I go on a regular movie binge!” His favorite movie theater was the Sheridan in the West Village of Manhattan, not far from a townhouse on Washington Square where he and his wife and model, the artist Josephine Nivison, lived on the top floor for most of their lives. Calm, silent and luminous, “The Sheridan Theatre” … oozes strangeness.
     —Benjamin Genocchio in the NY Times
75 notes · View notes
semioticas · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Hopper
Artista da solidão: Edward Hopper, precursor da Pop Art, ilustre aniversariante de 22 de julho – fotografado por Arnold Newman em 1960, tendo ao fundo Josephine Nivison, também artista plástica e esposa de Hopper. Veja mais em:
Semióticas – Silêncio de Hopper
.
5 notes · View notes
artmialma · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Edward Hopper    
 A Woman in the Sun   1961
As Edward Hopper matured he left more and more visual detail out of his paintings and focused on the psychological reality of his subjects. In A Woman in the Sun, a nude female stands in a shaft of raking light from a nearby window. The room has been reduced to its simplest architectural components. The few judicious details that remain—a pair of black pumps, the turned wood bedposts, and the vaguely delineated painting on the wall—only accentuate the barrenness of the scene and the figure. The voyeuristic, almost cinematic setting suggests a narrative, enticing the viewer to imagine the events that may have occurred prior to the scene we now view, and what will happen next. Hopper’s wife, Josephine Nivison Hopper, served as the model for this figure as she did for many of the women who appeared in his paintings. She was seventy-eight at the time of this painting, but Hopper transformed her, like the rest of the scene, according to his own internal vision rather than faithfully adhering to realistic detail
44 notes · View notes
playitagin · 1 year
Text
1967 – Edward Hopper
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Edward Hopper (July 22, 1882 – May 15, 1967) was an American realist painter and printmaker.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
While he is widely known for his oil paintings, he was equally proficient as a watercolorist and printmaker in etching.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Hopper created subdued drama out of commonplace subjects 'layered with a poetic meaning', inviting narrative interpretations. He was praised for "complete verity" in the America he portrayed. His career benefited significantly from his marriage to fellow-artist Josephine Nivison, who contributed much to his work, both as a life-model and as a creative partner.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
6 notes · View notes
linarei · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Edward Hopper (July 22, 1882 – May 15, 1967) was an American realist painter and printmaker. While he is widely known for his oil paintings, he was equally proficient as a watercolorist and printmaker in etching. His career benefited decisively from his marriage to fellow-artist Josephine Nivison, who contributed much to his work, both as a life-model and as a creative partner. Hopper was a minor-key artist, creating subdued drama out of commonplace subjects 'layered with a poetic meaning', inviting narrative interpretations, often unintended. He was praised for 'complete verity' in the America he portrayed.
4 notes · View notes
oubliettederien · 2 months
Text
Per la Grande Arte al Cinema prodotta da Nexo digital, il 9 e 10 aprile 2024 è in arrivo un docufilm d’eccezione dedicato a Edward Hopper, pittore simbolo dell’arte americana.
0 notes
othersidesofnobody · 1 year
Text
1 note · View note
Text
Tumblr media
Josephine Nivison Hopper - Obituary (n.d.)
46 notes · View notes
qiffin · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
The Soft Sabbath
A piece on Edward Hopper
By Griffin Gibson
502-120-VA Visual Literacy And Culture
Pull the plug, Cut the cord, Disconnect. That is Edward Hopper. Born into a well off bourgeois family, by the age of five Hopper had a clear intuitive talent with art and was signing his work by 11. Throughout this time, his family was providing him with the materials and books to educate himself with. After highschool, Hopper went off to college for design and began freelance painting with moderate success. He went on to date and soon marry a former friend from college, Josephine Nivison, a very important person in his life. In that same year, with a couple decades of experience painting, he had his first breakthrough at a show his wife helped set up. For the next few decades, his work was a soft wave of success flowing across him. He had won. Everyone has an inner and outer story, and Hopper’s outer story was very boring in a sense. Pain is always on the inside. Hopper worked with a few different types of art. He was very adept with charcoal from a young age and was talented with watercolor, though a majority of his pieces were rendered and paved in oil paint. As a young adult in New York City, he fell in love with the concrete and tarmac around him and had a fascination for the scenery shown everywhere, sometimes with a few people shown in his work. In “Office in a small city” there's just one. Hopper has a tendency to depict people voyeuristically, he shows flawed people in the places he makes. They're never happy, never complete, they smothered in contemplation. You’d be lucky to see the average set of lips Hopper makes move 3 degrees from the last. In ‘Office in a Small City’, Hopper portrays an office worker in a solid yet sedated state, the man is completely relaxed leaning back, but he's aware. He can hear and see but he's melting into his chair and staring into his own head. Hopper paints and paints and paints different colours and people, but in the end, it's all him. “I think the American Scene painters caricatured America. I always wanted to do myself”.
The standout feature in ‘Office in a Small City’ would be the smoothness of it all, like a steam roller drove up the side of the buildings. That sort of texture is commonplace in Hopper's work. The space and form of the picture is another highlight, the paneless windows letting you into the lives of others. Hopper's buildings are made in a personified way. He has a usual spacing, a common feature being a hollow window set in front of and behind the focal figure, this being done in Office in a Small City as well. Your eyes pierce through the concrete being seeing its insides and outsides with the binoculars and vantage point Hopper made for you. There's an interesting use of color in the piece, as while the lighting and sky would make you think there's happiness involved, everything around the man is dry. It's a completely unromantic view of the time of day, showing the complexity of what's inside someone's cranium to be more important than simply the mood. In this painting, and many of his others, he transcends traditional melancholy and other gray emotions. He's able to represent loneliness even when surrounded by others or even a sense of unsatisfied boredom in his art. If we are to assume this is part of himself, does an apathetic reaction mean something? In the time he was living in, this grandiose level of infrastructure in metropolises was considered an achievement of man so im able to see this as Hopper in his studio, looking over his life's work, his success, though the satisfaction, the flag in the mountain, it eludes him. He's still relaxed, at this point in his life he would be 72 with a path of success paved behind him but this doesn't mean he's happy. The message is one of the human condition. I think this painting, and alot his work, is about people. In a concrete jungle it's easy to step on the insects. I think it's about the inner. Objectively, this painting is made up of a person and a building. Subjectively, both of those things are man. What you think are solid atoms melt back into the heart, not the brain. It's worth mentioning at this point that Hopper's marriage with Josephine Nivison did not have a happy ending. As time marched on they grew entangled with flaws, ending with resentment. Most of the women in Hopper's paintings were modeled after his wife because of her very strict demands. This later failed relationship put Hopper through a soft hardship. The kind you can't sleep through. The cultural impact of Hopper's work is immense. Though many of his pictures do not have any sort of readily clear message or political view, they've regardless been a massive inspiration for many artists. His ability to animate a landscape was something admired by many people, myself included. The colours he chooses to use are always thought out, much like the other aspects of his work and with his poetic depictions of people that are stuck in a workers world yet still resonate deeply with many despite the images’ context, it makes for something to be inspired by. Beyond even technical skill, sapped inspiration from many were yet derived from Hopper’s paintings because of their cultural significance in their depictions of jaded people molded through the world. Growing up in the start of the 20th century and late 19th century, Hopper was witness to the effects labor had on people and that time-period-specific experience more than bleeds through his art. I'd argue it's the metaphorical heart of what he paints, the core that builds all around it. As mentioned before, the framing of the piece is important, it shows us both a behind and frontal view of this man. We see how he sees the world. Another key factor would be that Hopper’s paintings rarely have an entry point that's not a window. Our only way into these peoples’ lives are through a hollow window, a peak, a skewed view through an honest one.
Hopper's work is extremely subjective. I've brought up many things that could have been represented, or were instead completely unrelated and are a wild guess. Yet that's the thing, I don't think there is a concrete message to Hopper’s concrete jungles, I think because he's always strived to paint himself, when you look at a piece of his, your eyes show you what you have inside. In that way, Hopper’s paintings are able to be seen by anyone and understood at least in some way, though I don't think they were meant for anyone, he made them for himself. I personally adore Hopper’s work, many of his paintings capture this sort of essence of being I can't seem to find anywhere else. When I look through the paneless hollow windows of Edward Hopper’s work, I always just end up seeing myself again. Pull the plug. Cut the cord. Disconnect. That is Edward Hopper.
Bibliography :     
Nochlin, Linda. "Edward Hopper and the imagery of alienation." Art Journal 41.2 (1981): 136-141.
“Rather, Hopper, a realist, works with the rhetorical device of synecdoche, the substitution of a concrete part for an equally concrete whole.” 
Levin, Gail. Edward Hopper: an intimate biography. Univ of California Press, 1998.
"I think the American Scene painters caricatured America. I always wanted to do myself."
Appendix
Office in a Small City (1953)
1 note · View note
drrobertpuffphd · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Edward Hopper 1882-1967 New York, NY “A Woman in the Sun” 1961 Oil on linen Photo is taken by: @robertpuffjr Josephine Nivison Hopper, Edward Hopper's wife, served as the model for the figure in A Woman in the Sun, as she did for many of the women depicted in his compositions. She was seventy-eight at the time this work was created; rather than adhere faithfully to realistic detail, Hopper depicted her according to his own internal vision and memory. Raking light floods the room, and the woman's naked body meets the sun's rays yet her expression is enigmatic. The voyeuristic scene invites the viewer to imagine a narrative.. (This writeup is taken from the description at Wikipedia.) Whitney Museum of American Art, NYC, New York, USA #edwardhopper #hopper #whitneymuseum #newyorkcity #whitneymuseumofamericanart #historyofart #arthistory #greatworksofart #artmuseum #art #artist #masterpiece #painting #museumvisit #artlover #artists #artblogger (at Whitney Museum of American Art) https://www.instagram.com/p/Ce7wWwSre2X/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
coochiequeens · 4 years
Link
Josephine and Edward got hitched that same year, 1924, embarking on a tumultuous marriage. But while Edward’s star rose, hers fell — hard. When she bequeathed a trove of her and her husband’s work to the Whitney upon her death in 1968, the museum kept most of his creations and dumped her stuff — “loaning” pieces out to hospitals and office buildings and even relegating some to the trash.
0 notes
wallacepolsom · 6 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Wallace Polsom, Jo's World (for Josephine Nivison Hopper) (2018), paper collage, 16.5 x 18.3 cm.
104 notes · View notes