#Law and Order: Trial by Jury | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

serenasoutherlyns · 2 years

Text

bored at work feeling writey send prompts pls

#law & order #law and order #law and order: trial by jury #novelly #calex #cabenson #casey novak #alex cabot #claire kincaid #kincoy #law and order svu #svu

6 notes · View notes

bonniehooper · 6 months

Text

Top Picks of 2023

My Top 14 New Favorite Actresses - #7: Marlyne Barrett

Introduction to Her: Chicago Med

#Top Picks of 2023 #My Top 14 New Favorite Actresses #Marlyne Barrett #Chicago Med #Hitch #The Jury #Law and Order #Law and Order: Trial by Jury #Rescue Me #Law and Order: Special Victims Unit #Damages #The Wire #The Good Wife #Gossip Girl #American Crime

0 notes

fyeahamycarlson · 11 months

Text

#some Kelly’s for y’all #amy carlson #crazyyy hot🔥🥵#blondie #Kelly Gaffney #law and order: trial by jury #law and order: tbj #law & order trial by jury #trial by jury #l&o: tbj #Kelly screenshots

1 note · View note

plush4bunny · 7 months

Text

POV: you're Gabriel Duvall's S/O taking a picture of him with 2 of your pets - Ebony and Ivory - to celebrate the holidays 🎄🎁 (and probly send back as a card for the folks back home)

from @chrism02's holiday special chapter 🎄🎁 from their fic on Gabriel Duvall called "New Beginnings"

#alfred molina #chrism02's Gabriel Duvall #gabriel duvall #gabriel duvall x reader #law and order svu #law and order trial by jury #fanart #character design #character art #artists on tumblr #character concept

46 notes · View notes

fuckyeahalfredmolina · 2 years

Photo

Part two of a two-part crossover story between “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit” and “Law & Order: Trial by Jury.

Angela Lansbury was nominated for Outstanding Guest Actress In A Drama Series - 2005.

#alfred molina #alfredmolina #angela lansbury #law and order svu #law and order trial by jury #gifs #gifs set #tv #gabriel duvall #eleanor duvall #angela was amazinggggggggg

178 notes · View notes

thena0315 · 3 months

Text

Peter Scanavino as Robert Hassel on L&O: Trial By Jury - Boys Will Be Boys (1x12)

Clip-2

#peter scanavino #law and order trial by jury #trial by jury #actor #pre #sonny carisi #before svu

12 notes · View notes

chrism02 · 1 year

Note

can you make an angst but happy ending fic with any alfred characters pls

Tag list: @purplelupins @eroticaplush @unitedfandomsoftheworld

@reuripotte @overlookedfile @randomfandomtrash28 @littlethief78

@belladonnaaura @wolfe171 @movieexpert1978 @yesalwayswelles

@jembug28 @iobsessoverfictionalmen @benedicttcumberbabe

@whateverthecostner @redlektor

@imwithyoutiltheendofthelinebucky

#alfred molina #gabriel duvall #gabriel duvall x reader #law & order: special victims unit #law & order: trial by jury #boston legal #au canon divergence #soulmate au #soulmarks #autism

28 notes · View notes

enixamyram · 1 year

Text

Sometimes a show wants to do something but they don't know how, so they just do it all wrong.

Special Victims Unit Season 15 Episode 14: Comic Perversion.

They want to do this thing where a comedic is accused and he just makes the jury laugh while defending himself because he's apparently that funny. Except his jokes aren't funny normally, and they're even less funny said while he's on trial for rape. I can believe a group of stupid college frat boys would laugh at unfunny rape jokes, but grown members of a jury just looks like bad writing on the scripts part.

#Law and Order #Law & Order Special Victims Unit #Season 15 Episode 14 #Comic Perversion #The joke was literally about how he has bruised and torn the girl during rape.#He turns to the jury and says 'oh we've all been there'#and they laugh?#Again #frat boys I understand #members of jury during a rape trial?#I think one member didn't laugh.#The rest - including the women - did?

2 notes · View notes

consolecadet · 6 months

Text

Big news: Google has lost its first antitrust case. Via Matt Stoller:

So what happens now? In this case, the judge will come up with remedies next year. The order could be broad, and will likely loosen Google’s control over the mobile app ecosystem. Google has already announced that it will appeal, so the case isn’t over.

That said, Google is likely to be in trouble now, because it is facing multiple antitrust cases, and these kinds of decisions have a bandwagon effect. The precedent is set, in every case going forward the firm will now be seen as presumed guilty, since a jury found Google has violated antitrust laws. Judges are cautious, and are generally afraid of being the first to make a precedent-setting decision. Now they won’t have to. In fact, judges and juries will now have to find a reason to rule for Google. If, say, Judge Amit Mehta in D.C., facing a very similar fact-pattern, chooses to let Google off the hook, well, he’ll look pretty bad.

#google #monopolies #boring text posts #links #antitrust #hall of fame

11K notes · View notes

tvthemesongs · 1 year

Text

Law & Order: Trial by Jury intro

#law and order trial by jury #nbc #2000s #to watch

0 notes

serenasoutherlyns · 4 months

Text

with me tonight

T/K drabble. Ao3

“Kelly?” The voice came from behind her, unmistakable. She jumped.

Kelly made her excuses to the woman in front of her. “Tracey.”

“Fancy seeing you here.” The awkwardness hung in the air.

“I didn’t know you were,”

“Likewise,” Tracey said.

“Are you having luck?” Kelly hated these events, but she had been too single for too long.

“Not so much,” said Tracey, tilting her glass back and winking at Kelly. A warm feeling came over her. “I do wonder if that will change.”

Kelly couldn’t deny, she had thought about it before.

“I can see how it might,” said Kelly.

#law & order #law & order: trial by jury #tracey kibre #kelly gaffney #sficx

7 notes · View notes

justinspoliticalcorner · 11 days

Text

David Badash at NCRM:

Republicans ground the House to a halt Wednesday afternoon after U.S. Rep. Erin Houchin (R-IN) objected to remarks made by Rules Committee Ranking Member Jim McGovern (D-MA), during which he delivered a short overview of the 88 criminal charges Donald Trump is facing, and civil court findings including one deeming him an adjudicated rapist. “Take down his words,” Congresswoman Houchin declared, interrupting Rep. McGovern. “I demand that his words be taken down.” For more than one hour, according to Fox News’ Chad Pergram, the people’s business stopped as Republicans, angered by the Democrat’s factual remarks, had them investigated by the House Parliamentarian. “Donald Trump might want to be a king, but he is not a king,” Congressman McGovern observed. “He is not a presumptive king. he’s not even the president – he’s a presumptive nominee.”

“At some point,” McGovern told his congressional colleagues, “it’s time for this body to recognize that there is no precedent for this situation. We have a presumptive nominee for President facing 88 felony counts, and we’re being prevented from even acknowledging it. These are not alternative facts. These are real facts. A candidate for President of the United States is on trial for sending a hush money payment to a porn star to avoid a sex scandal during his 2016 campaign, and then fraudulently disguising those payments in violation of the law. He’s also charged with conspiring to overturn the election. He’s also charged with stealing classified information and a jury has already found him liable for rape and a civil court. And yet, in this Republican controlled House, it’s okay to talk about the trial but you have to call it a sham.” The decision to strike McGovern’s “offensive” remarks appears to have come from U.S. Rep. Jerry Carl (R-AL), who was presiding over the chamber. He cited House Rule XVII, which Pergram reported “says House members are prohibited from impugning the motives of fellow House members, senators or the President. And in this case, the former President.”

Earlier, before Rep. Houchin demanded his remarks be stricken, McGovern also blasted Republicans for traveling to New York in their “cult uniforms,” to show support for Donald Trump at his criminal trial in Lower Manhattan. The Massachusetts Democrat told his colleagues, “my friends over the other side of the aisle have pandered to their most extreme members over and over and over again. They let the extremists kick out their own Speaker. They let the extremists dictate the agenda on the House floor. They let the extremists take down seven rule votes since January 2023 – a stunning indictment of their ability to get anything done. And speaking of indictments, Republicans are skipping their real jobs to take day trips up to New York to try to undermine Donald Trump’s criminal trial. No time to work with Democrats, but plenty of time to put on weird matching cult uniforms and stand behind President Trump with their bright red ties like pathetic props.”

Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA)’s speech on the House floor calling out criminal defendant Donald Trump was delivering truth bombs left and right, and it made Republicans upset, especially the part in which he said that Trump “might want to be a king, but he is not a king” and the fact that he was calling out his criminality.

Rep. Erin Houchin (R-IN) was the Republican who ordered a frivolous halt to McGovern’s speech by demanding “that his words be taken down.” Floor Presider Jerry Carl (R-AL) granted Houchin’s request, and McGovern was barred from speaking on the Floor for the rest of the day.

See Also:

NBC News: Democrat McGovern ruled 'out of order' after listing off Trump's legal woes on the House floor

Daily Kos: GOP brings House to a halt to debate whether facts are allowed

#Jim McGovern #Erin Houchin #Jerry Carl #118th Congress #US House of Representatives #Donald Trump Trial #Donald Trump #People of New York v. Trump #House Rules Committee

342 notes · View notes

fyeahamycarlson · 8 months

Text

One actress. Four fantastic roles.

#amy carlson #linda reagan #josie watts #kelly gaffney #Alex Taylor #another world #Blue Bloods #third watch #law and order trial by jury #team linda reagan #crazyyy hot🔥🥵#my edit #my edits

1 note · View note

simply-ivanka · 25 days

Text

Trump and the Lawfare Implosion of 2024

Will his prosecution end up putting him back in the White House?

Wall Street Journal

By Kimberley A. Strassel

What’s that old saying about the “best-laid plans”? Democrats banked that a massive lawfare campaign against Donald Trump would strengthen their hold on the White House. As that legal assault founders, they’re left holding the bag known as Joe Biden.

In Florida on Tuesday, Judge Aileen Cannon postponed indefinitely the start of special counsel Jack Smith’s classified-documents trial. The judge noted the original date, May 20, is impossible given the messy stack of pretrial motions on her desk. The prosecution is fuming, while the press insinuates—or baldly asserts—that the judge is biased for Mr. Trump, incompetent or both. But it is Mr. Smith and his press gaggle who are living in legal unreality, attempting to rush the process to accommodate a political timeline.

What did they expect? Mr. Smith waited until 2023 to file legally novel charges involving classified documents, a former president, and a complex set of statutes governing presidential records. The pretrial disputes—some sealed for national-security reasons—involve weighty questions about rules governing the admission of classified documents in criminal trials, discovery, scope and even whether Mr. Smith’s appointment as special counsel was lawful. Judge Cannon notes the court has a “duty to fully and fairly consider” all of these, which she believes will take until at least July. This could push any trial beyond the election.

Mr. Smith’s indictments in the District of Columbia, alleging that Mr. Trump plotted to overturn the 2020 election, have separately gone to the Supreme Court, where the justices are determining whether and when a former president is immune from criminal prosecution for acts while in office. A decision on the legal question is expected in June, whereupon the case will likely return to the lower courts to apply it to the facts. That may also mean no trial before the election.

A Georgia appeals court this week decided it would review whether Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis can continue leading her racketeering case against Mr. Trump in light of the conflict presented by her romantic relationship with the former special prosecutor. The trial judge is unlikely to proceed while this major issue is pending, and the appeals process could take up to six months.

Which leaves the lawfare crowd’s last, best hope in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s muddled charges on that Trump 2016 “hush money” deal with adult-film star Stormy Daniels. That case was a mess well before Judge Juan Merchan allowed Ms. Daniels to provide the jury Kama-Sutra-worthy descriptions of her claimed sexual tryst with Mr. Trump, during which she intimated several times that the encounter was nonconsensual.

Mr. Trump is charged with falsifying records, not sexual assault, and even the judge acknowledged the jury heard things that “would have been better left unsaid.” He tried to blame the defense for not objecting enough during her testimony, but it’s the judge’s job to keep witnesses on task. Judge Merchan refused a Trump request for a mistrial, but his openness to issuing a “limiting instruction” to the jury—essentially an order to unhear prejudicial testimony—is an acknowledgment that things went off the rails. If Mr. Trump is convicted, it’s also a strong Trump argument for reversal on appeal.

Little, in short, is going as planned. The lawfare strategy from the start: pile on Mr. Trump in a way that ensured Republicans would rally for his nomination, then use legal proceedings to crush his ability to campaign, drain his resources, and make him too toxic (or isolated in prison) to win a general election. He won the nomination, but the effort against him is flailing, courtesy of an echo chamber of anti-Trump prosecutors and journalists who continue to indulge the fantasy that every court, judge, jury and timeline exists to dance to their partisan fervor.

These own goals are striking. Mr. Smith wouldn’t be facing delays if he’d acknowledged up front the important constitutional question of presidential immunity, or if he’d sought an indictment for obstruction of justice and forgone charging Mr. Trump with improperly handling classified documents, which gets into legally complicated territory. The federal charges might carry more weight with the public had Mr. Bragg refrained from bringing a flimsy case that makes the whole effort look wildly partisan. And Ms. Willis’s romantic escapades have turned her legal overreach into a reality-TV joke.

Democrats faced a critical choice last year: Try to win an election by confronting the real problem of a weak and old president presiding over unpopular far-left policies, or try to rig an outcome by embracing a lawfare stratagem. They chose the latter. Perhaps a court will still convict Mr. Trump of something, although that could play either way with the electorate. Lawfare as politics is a very risky business.