Tumgik
#abortions
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
16K notes · View notes
thingstrumperssay · 5 months
Text
So Texas did what they were always planning to do and made abortions even if the mother's life is at risk illegal.
A woman who's name is Kate Cox tried to fight against the supreme court because the fetus isn't viable and she will die if she doesn't get an abortion, and they told her "too bad."
They were never pro-life.
361 notes · View notes
emmbrr · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
safe abortions for all
4K notes · View notes
yesterdayiwrote · 2 years
Text
I’m thinking today about Savita Halappanavar, an Indian dentist living in Ireland, who in 2012 suffered a partial miscarriage of her first pregnancy. Doctors refused to perform an abortion to expel the foetus as it still had a detectable heartbeat. She developed sepsis and died. She was 31.
About Agnieszka T, a Polish woman who was pregnant with twins. She miscarried one foetus but was refused an abortive procedure. 6 days later her second foetus died. She had to wait 2 further days to be given a termination. She died 3 weeks later of septic shock. She had a husband and 3 other children. She was 37.
About Izabela, a Polish woman whose foetus was found to have several abnormalities, but who was determined to carry to term. When her waters broke in the 22nd week of pregnancy she was told she had to wait until her foetus had no heartbeat before they could induce her or perform a c-section. She died leaving behind a husband and nine year old daughter. She was 30.
About Andrea Prudente, an American woman on a ‘babymoon’ in Malta where she suffered an incomplete miscarriage. Due to Malta’s complete ban on abortion, she was denied an abortion that would save her life. She asked her husband to punch her in the stomach as hard as he could to either induce labour or stop the foetal heartbeat. She was medically evacuated to Spain where they safely performed the procedure needed to end her pregnancy and save her life. This happened on Thursday.
Restrictive abortion bans harm anybody who can get pregnant. They harm planned pregnancies, as much as unplanned ones. They harm residents and non residents. If you’re reading what’s happening in America and thinking ‘Well at least it’s not my country’, sorry to say there’s every chance you could still end up affected one day. Abortion is basic healthcare, and basic healthcare is a basic human right. All these women were denied theirs, and these are just the tip of the iceberg. The last 3 all happened within the last year. Rather than these women being a sign of the past, instead they’re now very much a sign of what’s to come in America and that’s terrifying.
6K notes · View notes
sparksinthenight · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Bryan Lyman ✔️: Coleman-Madison offered an amendment requiring the state of Alabama to pay for medical care to the age of 3 for any child it requires a woman to carry to term. It was defeated 23 to 6. #alpolitics
Rev. Peter Preble: Once they are born they don’t care.
184 notes · View notes
awesomecooperlove · 5 months
Text
On May 27, 1982 approximately 17,000 babies were found in a repossessed storage container in Los Angeles. The babies, many of whom were over 20 weeks gestation.
Many of the children were found missing arms, legs, heads and internal organs. The medical lab that was responsible was an abortion facility.
Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History
🤯😡🤬
125 notes · View notes
Text
Joe Biden will sign legislation protecting access to abortion care into law if Democrats win control of Congress in midterm elections this fall.
In remarks to a Democratic National Committee event on 18 October, the President announced plans to sign a bill to codify Roe v. Wade protections on the 50th anniversary of the US Supreme Court decision – what he intends to be his first act of 2023.
In June, the nation’s high court struck down precedents established by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey that affirmed the constitutional right to abortion care.
Following the latest ruling, more than a dozen states have outlawed most abortions or severely restricted access to care, leading to the closures of dozens of clinics. Patients and providers across the US have warned of devastating consequences to losing access to legal abortion, while Democratic officials have made abortion rights central to their midterm campaigns as Republicans mull national abortion restrictions.
“If Republicans get their way with a national ban, it won’t matter where you live in America,” Mr. Biden said on Tuesday. “The only sure way to stop these extremist laws that have put in jeopardy women’s health and rights is for Congress to pass a law.”
Democrats would need to pick up several seats in the currently evenly split US Senate for abortion protections to prevail.
Mr. Biden also said he will veto any anti-abortion legislation passed by a Republican-controlled Congress.
The Democratic-led House of Representatives passed the Women’s Health Protection Act earlier this year, though Senate Republicans have repeatedly obstructed its introduction in that chamber. That bill would codify the right to abortion care as affirmed by Roe v. Wade.
House Democrats were only joined by three Republicans to pass the Ensuring Access to Abortion Act, which would protect the right of abortion patients who live in states that have outlawed or severely restricted care to travel to other states without risking prosecution or legal action in their home states.
The bill also would protect providers and others who help patients travelling out of state for their care.
Legislation would also shield interstate shipments of US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs used for medication abortion, the most common form of abortion care, accounting for more than half of all abortions in the US.
In a briefing with reporters on Monday, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre called Republican-led abortion restrictions “disturbing” and “very dangerous.”
“It’s backwards, again, it’s dangerous and it’s severe, in stark contrast to the President and the commitment that he has to leave these decisions between a woman and her doctor,” she said.
This fall, voters in several states will determine whether their state constitutions include explicit protections for abortion care, while elections for control of state legislatures, governors’ offices and secretaries of state will also determine the fates of abortion access across the US.
In his remarks on Tuesday, President Biden pointed to Kansas voters shooting down a recent anti-abortion ballot measure in that state, signalling the electoral consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision in midterm elections.
“One of the most extraordinary parts of [the Dobbs decision] was when the majority wrote, ‘women are not without electoral or political power.’ Let me tell you something – the Court and extreme Republicans who have spent decades trying to overturn Roe are about to find out,” he said.
893 notes · View notes
humanrightsconnected · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
This past Saturday marked one year since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Find out from the Guttmacher Institute where abortion laws currently stand in every U.S. state 👇. 
276 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
4K notes · View notes
enigma-the-mysterious · 8 months
Text
"When I was a student, we used to have a dedicated Gynae Septic Ward in hospitals. Women who were brought to those wards, barely even half of them made it out alive. Nowadays, I hardly get to see any of those wards. Do you know why?"
None of us could guess the answer to the professor's question. After a while of back and forth, he answered it himself.
"It's thanks to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. So, today we are going to learn about MTP and how to perform it!"
126 notes · View notes
clown-owo · 2 years
Text
i keep seeing posts about how "criminalizing abortion won't actually stop abortions, it just makes them unsafe. the only way to reduce abortions is with comprehensive sex education and access to contraceptives-" they don't care they don't care they don't care.
the people who want to criminalize abortions don't care. you likely won't convince them with that kind of argument because they aren't actually interested in reducing abortions they are interested in punishing the people who get abortions. in their eyes unsafe abortions is just another punishment for the abortion. because they consider a fetus to be alive, saying that is like arguing that "you shouldn't ban murder because it doesn't actually stop murder".
This argument assumes you have the same core beliefs about when life begins. It is flawed from the outset. you need to argue assuming or disagreeing with their core beliefs on when life begins to even have a chance of convincing them.
for instance, even if a fetus is considered a whole person with rights, no one is entitled to use anyone else's body to survive. in the US, you legally cannot take the organs of a dead person without their consent even if it would save someone else's life, let alone a living person. no one can force you to donate blood. you should not be forced to give up your body for the life of another, in any circumstance. especially not when it puts your own in danger.
and also! in that same vein, "you want to ban abortions despite evidence showing it doesn't work but claim regulating guns doesn't work when the evidence supports it" is not the gotcha you think it is. Because those kinds of people believe that all abortions are bad, but guns can be used for good. they want to regulate abortions because they believe there is no or very few excuses for one, and they don't want to regulate guns because they don't want to risk restricting guns (as they love to bring up the 2nd amendment) for otherwise good people who wouldn't use them to kill.
608 notes · View notes
fromgreecetoanarchy · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
984 notes · View notes
beeclops · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
59 notes · View notes
Text
A Texas woman who had sought a legal medical exemption for an abortion has left the state after the Texas Supreme Court paused a lower court decision that would allow her to have the procedure, lawyers for the Center for Reproductive Rights said Monday.
State District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble last week had ruled that Kate Cox, a 31-year-old mother of two from Dallas, could terminate her pregnancy. According to court documents, Cox's doctors told her her baby suffered from the chromosomal disorder trisomy 18, which usually results in either stillbirth or an early death of an infant.
As of the court filing last week, Cox was 20 weeks pregnant. According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought the lawsuit, Cox left the state because she "couldn't wait any longer" to get the procedure.
"Her health is on the line," said Center for Reproductive Rights CEO Nancy Northup. "She's been in and out of the emergency room and she couldn't wait any longer."
In response to Gamble's decision, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton warned a Texas medical center that it would face legal consequences if an abortion were performed.
In an unsigned order late Friday, the Texas Supreme Court then temporarily paused Gamble's ruling.
On Monday, after Cox left the state, the state Supreme Court lifted the pause and ruled against Cox's request, dismissing it as moot.
According to court documents, Cox's doctors had told her that early screening and ultrasound tests suggested her pregnancy is "unlikely to end with a healthy baby," and due to her two prior cesarean sections, continuing the pregnancy puts her at risk of "severe complications" that threaten "her life and future fertility."
The lawsuit alleges that due to Texas' strict abortion bans, doctors have told her their "hands are tied" and she would have to wait until the fetus dies inside her or carry the pregnancy to term, when she will have to undergo a third C-section "only to watch her baby suffer until death."
The lawsuit was filed as the state Supreme Court is weighing whether the state's strict abortion ban is too restrictive for women who suffer from severe pregnancy complications. An Austin judge ruled earlier this year that women who experience extreme complications could be exempt from the ban, but the ruling is on hold while the all-Republican Supreme Court considers the state's appeal. 
In the arguments before the state Supreme Court, the state's lawyers suggested that a woman who is pregnant and receives a fatal fetal diagnosis could bring a "lawsuit in that specific circumstance." 
According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, Cox v. Texas is the first case since the overturning of Roe v. Wade to be filed on behalf of a pregnant person seeking emergency abortion care. Last week, a woman in Kentucky who is 8 weeks pregnant filed a lawsuit challenging the state's two abortion bans. 
94 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
4K notes · View notes
defleftist · 2 years
Text
Anyone else want to go set the Supreme Court on fire tonight?
771 notes · View notes