Reminder, everyone, that queerness is not a personality trait. It can be an essential part of your identity and representation fucking matters, but your personality does NOT define your gender or sexuality.
The point of this post is not to call anyone out in particular for perpetuating harmful stereotypes about queerness/gender, but to ask people to be more reflective about why we tend to base our understanding of queerness in particular around stereotypical ideas of femininity and masculinity. Hypermasculinity harms all of us. If you are a trans woman, there is no RIGHT/CORRECT way to be a woman. If you are a trans man, you should NOT feel like you are less of a man because you embrace qualities our heteronormative society deems “feminine.” Obviously, right? Well, if you were to observe fandom and shipping dynamics, these values become…murky.
I say this out of the kindness of my heart and with all the love in the world, but folks gotta be more careful when they say, “I can’t believe people think THIS character is straight!!!!” with 100% sincerity particularly regarding a narrative where the author very obviously did not intend to make characters gay. (You’re excused if you say it because you’re just passionate and having a good time and I respect you for that.)
I am bothered by these statements because…upon what exactly are you basing this argument? The problem is, because the author (derogatory) did not intend for people to interpret particular characters as gay/queer, there is a strong likelihood this statement is based on stereotypical ideas of what queerness looks like. “He is dramatic/emotional” is…uh…not a good reason to think someone is gay. A man with stereotypical feminine qualities does not necessarily mean they are gay. A woman with traits associated with hypermasculinity does not necessarily mean they are gay.
Do I think Remus Lupin and Nymphadora Tonks are gay? YES. Do I think Tonks could probably be gender fluid? Yes! Do I adamantly believe that Sirius is a bisexual semi-aro superstar? Also very much Yes. So it’s not like I don’t have opinions or feelings about this. However, there is SO MUCH HARM in believing that men who embrace softness, beauty, and vulnerability MUST be queer. Okay, you say. But in MY mlm ship, one guy is SUPER DUPER masculine and the other one is feminine. Right. That’s part of my point. Hypermasculinity is so pervasive even in queer spaces that ships are often reduced to “this is the top/masculine person in the relationship, and this is the bottom/feminine person.” So…uhhhh…what does this sound like?
Yesterday, I had a conversation with my students (teenagers) to explain why “she wears the pants in the relationship” is an extremely harmful idea. I asked them, “Okay, so what does that mean when you say that?” Students responded that it meant that the woman was the “boss” in her heterosexual relationship—that she was the controlling one.
“So when you say ‘she wears THE pants,’ are you suggesting that one person wears the ‘traditionally masculine’ article of clothing and the other should wear the traditionally ‘feminine’ article of clothing?” I prompted. They could see where I was going with this. So I went on, “Think about what we’re insinuating here. We’re saying that men are leaders—or at least, they SHOULD be. Masculinity is being a leader, and femininity is being a follower. Making a snide remark that ‘she wears the pants’ suggests that she is NOT assuming proper gender roles and it might strike some of us as funny. But do we see the problem with this? What does that sound like to you? And for that matter, should ANY partnership be so unbalanced that ONE person controls it?”
Kids were shaking their heads, but one student was really troubled by this. “But in every relationship, there’s got to be the person in charge and the person who is just…” He didn’t really finish the sentence. I’m pleased to say that most of my students immediately recognized the glaring issue with this. Most of the class shot this kiddo very horrified looks, and he was so shocked that people weren’t on his side (goodhearted kid, but clearly some messed up gender roles going on at his house). I let them discuss a bit more and finished with, “Be reflective in your relationships, friends. Dynamics like this can sometimes point to power imbalances—and generally, people shouldn’t feel inferior in their partnerships.”
Fandom is SO LIKE THIS. We equate personality with sexuality and gender so hard!!!! We try to inject hypermasculinity into queer spaces SO HARD. At some point, your desire to be ‘subversive’ just turns into toxic heteronormativity. When you make Remus hypermasculine and Sirius hyperfeminine because it “just feels right” - consider WHY this feels right to you when there really is not a lot in canon that points to these things. Why does it feel right to you that one person should “be a top” and one should “be a bottom”? This is not to say this is ILLEGAL or you shouldn’t make Sirius feminine—it’s just…think about the underlying message here when it’s in contrast to very very masculine Remus.
My point here is NOT “stop making characters gay/feminine!!!” My point is, hell yeah, the characters who are canonically straight could be gay, but also I really recommend avoiding basing this on stereotypes. “I can’t believe people think this overly dramatic/emotional/fashionable/soft man is straight!” Unpack that. Really think about it. What are you really saying? Just…be reflective, folks. You are not immune to the heteronormative agenda.
TL;DR // softness, aggressiveness, beauty, love, gentleness, competitiveness, etc. belong to everyone, every gender, every sexuality.
42 notes
·
View notes
To the person who sent this in my anons because you're a misogynistic and queerphobic coward, I would like to clarify here that there is ZERO evidence to suggest that what this person is spouting here is true. By saying feminism is toxic/is ruining women, all you're doing is admitting your own insecurities and superficiality. Because we can talk about and be critical of white feminism and the lack of inclusivity/transphobia in feminist spaces/etc, but this isn't what this guy is doing. He's spewing manosphere bullshit meant to radicalize men online because they want to continually see women as objects, not subjects.
Now, let's address the initial point he makes/alludes to about single women -by saying children of these single parents are suffering the most. For his and anyone's information -women are statistically the happiest on the planet when they are not married and child free in the first place, but when they do have children and they divorce their spouse they usually end up taking the brunt of the care (as they probably were in the first place) and although this can pose many challenges for their family depending on their socioeconomic background, that doesn't mean the kids will be more unhappy, unstable, and unsafe compared to children whose parents are married (and in any of those cases, there should be MORE resources for single parents instead of shaming them).
Many feminist and women's movements also made it possible for women to be liberated from heteropatriarchal ideals/standards/constraints that insisted they could only be happy if they got married and had children -and also, have the rights to access divorce in otherwise situations that made it impossible for her to leave abusive and unhealthy relationships (and divorce should be more widely de-stigmatized, accessible, and affordable). I know this varies cross-culturally, but a human being making decisions about THEIR lives -when it comes to marriage and having children -is what should always matter most.
Also the claim that queer families are reported to be more 'damaging,' is absolute bullshit.
This is the initial video sent to me and the following will be a few articles to debunk and challenge this propaganda he's making:
11 notes
·
View notes
I am so glad I’m not married. Every time I’ve been engaged it was to a cis man (I am non-binary) and it never worked out. I used to be sad about that but holy shit I’m so thankful now. and I’m seeing all my friends in heterosexual marriages to cis men just become miserable. Their husbands only care about making them feel better long enough that they stop crying and start making dinner. None of these men know how to do basic chores — if they do, they don’t do them because “I’m stressed out”. Your wife gets stressed too! Stop making her your mom! I think one of the most valuable things asexuality has taught me is how to be okay with my own company. When I was in a cishet relationship and didn’t know I was ace I was so codependent on my partner. Now I approach dating completely differently because I’ve learned how to be okay with my own company. But these cis men I see my friends marrying (all are cis women)… they don’t know how to be on their own. Ever. They demand to be mothered and only care about their wives when their wives are still girlfriends. I see it happen every single time. And I think part of that is also cishet allo women not learning how to be okay with their own company. And yeah it’s tough but like… would it really be worse than being married to someone whose essentially a large child who wants sex? I get so angry but these women defend every crappy thing their husbands do. The things I’ve watched these women get verbally abused for are things like not vacuuming, not packing his lunch, not cooking him dinner, not doing the laundry… and if I try to stand up to them they turn that on me and the wife is in tow. None of these women are conservative. It seems like cis allo men just don’t like cis allo women but aren’t mature enough to explore that. And it’s just so much pain to watch. I’m so glad I never married a cis het allo man. I’ve never seen people who are as lonely as their wives.
47 notes
·
View notes